In situ reverse transcription: the magic of strength and anonymity

Tracking DNA and RNA sequences at high resolution

In this chapter, the basic principles and protocols of the electron microscopical detections of specific DNA and RNA sequences are described. We focused primarily on a comparison of various methods of electron microscopy in situ hybridization (EM-ISH) with respect to their sensitivity and the structural preservation of the sample with the aim of helping the readers select the appropriate hybridization protocol. As the post-embedding EM-ISH most frequently represents the optimal choice, the protocol for the post-embedding EM-ISH approach is described in detail. Concurrently, the alternative methods based on the enzymatic synthesis of the labeled nucleic acids chains that can be used for the detection of DNA or RNA molecules in situ are mentioned. In this respect, the technique enabling the enzymatic detection of the polyadenylated RNA sequences is described in detail.

A New Method of the Visualization of the Double-Stranded Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA

The study describes the method of a sensitive detection of double-stranded DNA molecules in situ. It is based on the oxidative attack on the deoxyribose moiety by copper(I) in the presence of oxygen. We have shown previously that the oxidative attack leads to the formation of frequent gaps in DNA. Here we have demonstrated that the gaps can be utilized as the origins for an efficient synthesis of complementary labeled strands by DNA polymerase I and that such enzymatic detection of the double-stranded DNA is a sensitive approach enabling in-situ detection of both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes in formaldehyde-fixed human cells.

Atomic scissors: a new method of tracking the 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine-labeled DNA in situ

A new method of the light microscopy detection of BrdU-labeled DNA in situ is described. It is based on the oxidative attack at the deoxyribose moiety by copper(I) in the presence of oxygen, which leads to the abstraction of hydrogen atom from deoxyribose culminating in the elimination of the nucleobase, scission of the nucleic-acid strand and formation of frequent gaps. The gaps allow the reaction of the antibodies with the commonly used markers of replication (e.g. 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine), which are otherwise masked. The method developed makes it possible to detect nuclear and mitochondrial DNA replication efficiently. In most cases, it does not inhibit effective protein detections and in addition enables simultaneous localization of newly-synthesized RNA. The alternative presently-used methods result in protein denaturation and/or extensive DNA cleavage followed by the DNA-bound proteins peeling off.

Most anti-BrdU antibodies react with 2'-deoxy-5-ethynyluridine -- the method for the effective suppression of this cross-reactivity

5-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and 2'-deoxy-5-ethynyluridine (EdU) are widely used as markers of replicated DNA. While BrdU is detected using antibodies, the click reaction typically with fluorescent azido-dyes is used for EdU localisation. We have performed an analysis of ten samples of antibodies against BrdU with respect to their reactivity with EdU. Except for one sample all the others evinced reactivity with EdU. A high level of EdU persists in nuclear DNA even after the reaction of EdU with fluorescent azido-dyes if the common concentration of dye is used. Although a ten-time increase of azido-dye concentration resulted in a decrease of the signal provided by anti-BrdU antibodies, it also resulted in a substantial increase of the non-specific signal. We have shown that this unwanted reactivity is effectively suppressed by non-fluorescent azido molecules. In this respect, we have tested two protocols of the simultaneous localisation of incorporated BrdU and EdU. They differ in the mechanism of the revelation of incorporated BrdU for the reaction with antibodies. The first one was based on the use of hydrochloric acid, the second one on the incubation of samples with copper(I) ions. The use of hydrochloric acid resulted in a significant increase of the non-specific signal. In the case of the second method, no such effect was observed.