Salvage Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention ("DAIR") With Local Injection of a Selected Cocktail of Bacteriophages: Is It an Option for an Elderly Patient With Relapsing Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic-Joint Infection?

In Vitro Activity of Bacteriophages Against Ocular Methicillin-resistant S. aureus Isolates Collected in the US

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a leading cause of sight-threatening infections in the US. These strains pose a significant challenge in managing ocular infections, as they frequently exhibit resistance to first-line empirical antibiotics. To assess the potential of bacteriophages as innovative topical therapies for treatment of recalcitrant ocular infections, we evaluated the in vitro antimicrobial activity of a set of anti-S. aureus phages against a collection of ocular MRSA clinical isolates collected in the US.

METHODS

The host range of six phages (V4SA2, V1SA9, V1SA12, V1SA19, V1SA20 and V1SA22) was assessed using the spot assay on a panel of 50 multidrug-resistant (MDR) ocular MRSA isolates selected to be representative of clones circulating in the US. Subsequently, liquid culture-based host range assay was performed for the three most active phages using different multiplicity of infection (MOI of 10-2, 1 or 100 phages/bacteria).

RESULTS

In total, 90.0% of bacterial isolates were susceptible to at least one of the six phages. The spot host range assay showed that phages V1SA19, V1SA20 and V1SA22 had the broadest spectrum, being active against 86%, 84% and 82% of the isolates, respectively, including the MDR-MRSA CC5 and the community-associated CC8 lineages. A phage dose effect was observed across the liquid culture-based host range assay.

CONCLUSION

Phages V1SA19, V1SA20 and V1SA22 exhibited high antimicrobial activity against ocular MRSA. Bacteriophages represent a promising anti-infective strategy in ophthalmology that could be explored for improved topical therapy of recalcitrant MRSA infections.

Re-Emergence of Bacteriophages and Their Products as Antibacterial Agents: An Overview

Microbes possess diverse genetic and metabolic traits that help them withstand adverse conditions. Microbial pathogens cause significant economic losses and around 7.7 million human deaths annually. While antibiotics have historically been a lifesaving treatment, their effectiveness is declining due to antibiotic-resistant strains, prompting the exploration of bacterial predation as an alternative. Bacteriophages (BPhs) have reemerged as antibacterial agents, offering advantages over antibiotics, such as (i) high specificity, (ii) self-replication, and (iii) strong killing capacity. This review explores BPh- and enzyme-based antibacterial strategies for infectious disease treatment, discussing phage-antibiotic synergy, the risks of BPh resistance, and the role of quorum sensing in BPh therapy.

From forgotten cure to modern medicine: The resurgence of bacteriophage therapy

OBJECTIVES

The unregulated use of antibiotics has led to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. This study explores bacteriophage therapy as an alternative treatment, highlighting its history, significance, and advancements in Europe, the United States, and the Middle East.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review on bacteriophage therapy was conducted, focusing on its development, clinical trials, and patient treatment applications. The study also examined challenges, limitations, criteria for ideal phage selection, and manipulation techniques.

RESULTS

The United States and several European countries have advanced in phage therapy, progressing from clinical trials to patient treatment, whereas Middle Eastern countries are still in the early stages. Bacteriophages offer specificity, abundance, and minimal side effects, but challenges like safety concerns and potential resistance limit their widespread use.

CONCLUSION

Bacteriophage therapy shows promise as an antibiotic alternative but faces safety and resistance challenges. Continued research and better regulatory frameworks, especially in the Middle East, are needed to realize its potential.

Phage therapy for bone and joint infections: A comprehensive exploration of challenges, dynamics, and therapeutic prospects

OBJECTIVES

Bone and joint infections (BJI) pose formidable challenges in orthopaedics due to antibiotic resistance and the complexities of biofilm, complicating treatment. This comprehensive exploration addresses the intricate challenges posed by BJI and highlights the significant role of phage therapy as a non-antibiotic strategy.

METHODS

BJI, which encompass prosthetic joint infections, osteomyelitis, and purulent arthritis, are exacerbated by biofilm formation on bone and implant surfaces, hindering treatment efficacy. Gram-negative bacterial infections, characterized by elevated antibiotic resistance, further contribute to the clinical challenge. Amidst this therapeutic challenge, phage therapy emerges as a potential strategy, showing unique characteristics such as strict host specificity and biofilm disruption capabilities.

RESULTS

The review unveils the dynamics of phages, including their origins, lifecycle outcomes, and genomic characteristics. Animal studies, in vitro investigations, and clinical research provide compelling evidence of the efficacy of phages in treating Staphylococcus aureus infections, particularly in osteomyelitis cases. Phage lysins exhibit biofilm-disrupting capabilities, offering a meaningful method for addressing BJI. Recent statistical analyses reveal high clinical relief rates and a favourable safety profile for phage therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its promise, phage therapy encounters limitations, including a narrow host range and potential immunogenicity. The comprehensive analysis navigates these challenges and charts the future of phage therapy, emphasizing standardization, pharmacokinetics, and global collaboration. Anticipated strides in phage engineering and combination therapy hold promise for combating antibiotic-resistant BJI.

Local antibiotic delivery via intra-articular catheter infusion for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

There is an increasing interest in the use of intra-articular (IA) antibiotic infusion as a stand-alone or adjuvant therapy to standard revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence with respect to this up-and-coming treatment modality.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies published until April 2023 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Quality assessment was performed with the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool. Inclusion criteria were adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a mean follow-up of ≥ 11 months and a score ≥ 6 on the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool. Primary outcome was eradication of infection.

RESULTS

15 articles, encompassing 631 PJIs in 626 patients, were included in the final analysis, all level IV case series. The majority was treated with single-stage revision with adjuvant IA antibiotic infusion (79.1%). The remaining PJIs were treated with stand-alone IA antibiotic infusion (12.2%), DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) with adjuvant IA antibiotic infusion (5.7%) or two-stage revision with adjuvant IA antibiotic infusion (3.0%). Mean duration of IA antibiotic infusion was 19 days (range 3-50). An overall failure rate of approximately 11% was found. In total 117 complications occurred, 71 were non-catheter-related and 46 were catheter-related. The most common catheter-related complications were premature loss of the catheter (18/46) and elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels (12/46).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the lack of comparative studies the (added) benefit of IA antibiotic infusion in the treatment of PJI remains uncertain. Based on the current evidence, we would advise against using it as a stand-alone treatment. A prospective randomized controlled trial using a well-described infusion protocol is needed to see if the potential benefits justify the increased costs and potential complications of this treatment modality.

Access to phage therapy at Hospices Civils de Lyon in 2022: Implementation of the PHAGEinLYON Clinic programme

OBJECTIVES

To describe the PHAGEinLYON Clinic programme, set up in 2022 to improve access to phage therapy in France using pharmaceutical-grade phages.

METHODS

All phage therapy requests received during 2022 were collected prospectively, and reviewed retrospectively to analyse the decision and the patient care pathway (NCT05883995).

RESULTS

Of 143 requests for phage therapy, the indication was confirmed at a multidisciplinary team meeting for 57 (40%) patients. Forty-four patients were infected with bacteria that could be targeted easily by phages in France. Finally, 33 patients were treated, including 26 at the study institution, through a compassionate access programme or in a clinical trial. The main indication were complex bone and joint infections, endovascular infection and lung infection. In order to manage these patients, 172 pharmaceutical phage cocktails targeting Staphylococcus aureus and/or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were prepared: 57 for local injection and 99 for intravenous injection. During follow-up, 18 (69%) patients showed a favourable clinical evolution, and six (23%) patients required subsequent phage therapy, either with the same phage with greater exposure, or with a different phage from elsewhere.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the PHAGEinLYON Clinic programme in 2022 was associated with groundbreaking access to phage therapy in France.

PhagoScreener: A novel phagogram platform based on a capillary-wave microbioreactor

Due to the overuse of antibiotics, the number of multidrug-resistant pathogen bacteria is rising in recent years posing a serious threat to human health. One promising alternative for treatment is the application of phage therapy using highly selective bacteriophages. Because of their selectivity, individual screens called phagograms for each patient are required to select phages from a phage library. Phagograms are mostly performed via bacterial cultivation on double layer agar plates and phage addition causing bacterial lysis. However, these assays are work-intensive and have a low ability for parallelization and automation. Hence, highly parallelizable and automatable microbioreactors in the lowest microliter scale could offer an economic solution increasing the throughput of phagograms. This paper demonstrates the applicability of a novel capillary-wave microbioreactor (cwMBR) to perform phagograms. Due to its small volume of only 7 µL and the open-droplet design, it can be easily automated and parallelized in future. Furthermore, the ability of online biomass measurement makes the cwMBR a perfect phagogram platform in the future. Herein, phagograms with E. coli and different concentrations of the phages MM02 and EASG3 were performed as proof of concept for phagograms in the cwMBR. Thereby, the cwMBR was able to measure differences in lysis kinetics of different phages. Furthermore, the phagograms were compared to those in conventional microtiter plate readers revealing the cwMBR as ideal alternative for phagograms as it combines favorable mixing conditions and a phage repellent hydrophilic glass surface with online biomass measurement in an open-droplet design for future parallelization and automation.

Phage Therapy Against Antibiotic-Resistant and Multidrug-Resistant Infections Involving Nonhealing Wounds and Prosthetic Joint Infections Associated With Biofilms: A Mini-Review

Chronic wounds and prosthetic joint infections are difficult to treat and are associated with a high burden of disease and economic cost. The rise of antibiotic resistance and the understanding of biofilm formation has inflamed an already challenging situation. Bacteriophage therapy has been used throughout the last century to treat bacterial infections. However, in the last 10 years, there has been a resurgence in phage therapy as a novel innovative treatment for nonhealing wounds. This mini systemic review assesses relevant clinical studies, case series and trials over 5 years associated with safety, treatment and success rates of phage therapy concerning nonhealing and prosthetic joint infections. A search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Clinical Trials.gov databases resulted in 3151 studies, 27 met the criteria, and a total of 152 bacterial infections were treated from 130 individuals. Most common pathogen isolated in wounds was P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus was mostly associated with prosthetic joint infections. Treatment modalities differed across studies, adverse effects were limited, and success rate was deemed to be 91%.

Phage therapy: A primer for orthopaedic trauma surgeons

Phage therapy (PT) continues to attract interest in the fight against fracture-related infection (FRI), particularly for recurring infections that have not been resolved using conventional therapeutic approaches. The journey PT has taken from early clinical application in the pre-antibiotic era to its recent reintroduction to western clinical practice has been accelerated by the increased prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens in the clinic. This review will present PT's potential as a precise, adaptable, and effective treatment modality, with a focus on patient and phage selection, as well as the various administration protocols currently applied to patients. The challenges for PT, for example the most optimal application technique and dosing, are also discussed and underscore the importance of personalized approaches and the urgent need for more robust clinical evidence. Future perspectives, including phage engineering and innovative delivery systems will be discussed, as they may broaden the applicability of PT to a point where it may become a standard rather than an option of last resort for orthopedic infection management.

Bacteriophage therapy as an innovative strategy for the treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) following hip and knee arthroplasty is a catastrophic complication in orthopaedic surgery. It has long been a key focus for orthopaedic surgeons in terms of prevention and management. With the increasing incidence of antibiotic resistance in recent years, finding more targeted treatment methods has become an increasingly urgent issue. Bacteriophage Therapy (BT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive treatment for bone and joint infections in recent years. It not only effectively kills bacteria but also demonstrates significant anti-biofilm activity, garnering substantial clinical interest due to its demonstrated efficacy and relatively low incidence of adverse effects.

PURPOSE

This review aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of bacteriophage therapy in treating PJI following hip and knee arthroplasty, providing additional reference for its future clinical application.

METHODS

Following predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, our team conducted a systematic literature search across seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and WanFang Database). The search was conducted up to May 2024 and included multiple clinical studies on the use of bacteriophage therapy for treating PJI after hip and knee arthroplasty to assess its efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 16 clinical studies after screening, consisting of 15 case reports and one prospective controlled clinical trial, involving a total of 42 patients with PJI treated with bacteriophage therapy. The average patient age was 62.86 years, and 43 joints were treated, with patients undergoing an average of 5.25 surgeries. The most common pathogen in these infections was Staphylococcus aureus, accounting for 18 cases. 33 patients received cocktail therapy, while nine were treated with a single bacteriophage preparation. Additionally, all patients underwent suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) postoperatively. All patients were followed up for an average of 13.55 months. There were two cases of recurrence, one of which resulted in amputation one year postoperatively. The remaining patients showed good recovery outcomes. Overall, the results from the included studies indicate that bacteriophage therapy effectively eradicates infectious strains in various cases of PJI, with minimal side effects, demonstrating promising clinical efficacy.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of PJI following hip and knee arthroplasty, bacteriophages, whether used alone or in combination as cocktail therapy, have shown therapeutic potential. However, thorough preoperative evaluation is essential, and appropriate bacteriophage types and treatment regimens must be selected based on bacteriological evidence. Future large-scale, randomized controlled, and prospective trials are necessary to validate the efficacy and safety of this therapy.

Evaluation of bacteriophages for the alleviation of potential bacterial contamination risks in developmental engineering

This research aimed to address the potential bacterial contamination risks in developmental engineering (DE) using bacteriophages. To compare and contrast the exemplar Escherichia coli T4 and M13 bacteriophages, human dermal fibroblasts cultivated on culture plates, natural cellulosic scaffolds, and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) particles were utilized as two-dimensional (2D) cell, three-dimensional (3D) tissue, and modular tissue culture models, respectively. When directly introduced into these distinct culture systems, both phages survived, exhibited no significant effects on the cultured cells or tissues, yet displayed their potentials to alleviate the infections caused by corresponding bacterial host cells. Apart from direct addition into the culture medium, both phages were also coated on PMMA, polystyrene, poly(lactic acid) particles with different diameters (5, 10, 30, and 100 µm) and cellulosic scaffolds. The coated phages endured the coating processes and demonstrated their viabilities in plaque assays. Further testing indicated that the phages coated on the PMMA particles tolerated multiple deliberate rinses and centrifugations, but not thermal treatment at 60-80°C. In summary, T4 and M13 bacteriophages not only manifested their antibacterial functions in diverse 2D cell, 3D tissue, and modular tissue culture systems, but also demonstrated their potentials of coating modular scaffolds to alleviate the bacterial contamination risks in DE.

Periodontitis: etiology, conventional treatments, and emerging bacteriophage and predatory bacteria therapies

Inflammatory periodontal diseases associated with the accumulation of dental biofilm, such as gingivitis and periodontitis, are very common and pose clinical problems for clinicians and patients. Gingivitis is a mild form of gum disease and when treated quickly and properly is completely reversible. Periodontitis is an advanced and irreversible disease of the periodontium with periods of exacerbations, progressions and remission. Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory condition that damages the tissues supporting the tooth in its socket, i.e., the gums, periodontal ligaments, root cementum and bone. Periodontal inflammation is most commonly triggered by bacteria present in excessive accumulations of dental plaque (biofilm) on tooth surfaces. This disease is driven by disproportionate host inflammatory immune responses induced by imbalance in the composition of oral bacteria and changes in their metabolic activities. This microbial dysbiosis favors the establishment of inflammatory conditions and ultimately results in the destruction of tooth-supporting tissues. Apart microbial shift and host inflammatory response, environmental factors and genetics are also important in etiology In addition to oral tissues destruction, periodontal diseases can also result in significant systemic complications. Conventional methods of periodontal disease treatment (improving oral hygiene, dental biofilm control, mechanical plaque removal, using local or systemic antimicrobial agents) are not fully effective. All this prompts the search for new methods of therapy. Advanced periodontitis with multiple abscesses is often treated with antibiotics, such as amoxicillin, tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline, clindamycin, or combined therapy of amoxicillin with metronidazole. However, due to the growing problem of antibiotic resistance, treatment does not always achieve the desired therapeutic effect. This review summarizes pathogenesis, current approaches in treatment, limitations of therapy and the current state of research on the possibility of application of bacteriophages and predatory bacteria to combat bacteria responsible for periodontitis. We present the current landscape of potential applications for alternative therapies for periodontitis based on phages and bacteria, and highlight the gaps in existing knowledge that need to be addressed before clinical trials utilizing these therapeutic strategies can be seriously considered.

Mechanism-guided strategies for combating antibiotic resistance

Bacterial antibiotic resistance has been recognized as a global threat to public health. It challenges the antibiotics currently used in clinical practice and causes severe and often fatal infectious diseases. Fighting against antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) is growing more urgent. While understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie resistance is a prerequisite, several major mechanisms have been previously proposed including bacterial efflux systems, reduced cell membrane permeability, antibiotic inactivation by enzymes, target modification, and target protection. In this context, this review presents a panel of promising and potential strategies to combat antibiotic resistance/resistant bacteria. Different types of direct-acting and indirect resistance breakers, such as efflux pump inhibitors, antibiotic adjuvants, and oxidative treatments are discussed. In addition, the emerging multi-omics approaches for rapid resistance identification and promising alternatives to existing antibiotics are highlighted. Overall, this review suggests that continued effort and investment in research are required to develop new antibiotics and alternatives to existing antibiotics and translate them into environmental and clinical applications.

Repetitive combined doses of bacteriophages and gentamicin protect against Staphylococcus aureus implant-related infections in Galleria mellonella

Aims

Bacteriophages infect, replicate inside bacteria, and are released from the host through lysis. Here, we evaluate the effects of repetitive doses of the Staphylococcus aureus phage 191219 and gentamicin against haematogenous and early-stage biofilm implant-related infections in Galleria mellonella.

Methods

For the haematogenous infection, G. mellonella larvae were implanted with a Kirschner wire (K-wire), infected with S. aureus, and subsequently phages and/or gentamicin were administered. For the early-stage biofilm implant infection, the K-wires were pre-incubated with S. aureus suspension before implantation. After 24 hours, the larvae received phages and/or gentamicin. In both models, the larvae also received daily doses of phages and/or gentamicin for up to five days. The effect was determined by survival analysis for five days and quantitative culture of bacteria after two days of repetitive doses.

Results

In the haematogenous infection, a single combined dose of phages and gentamicin, and repetitive injections with gentamicin or in combination with phages, resulted in significantly improved survival rates. In the early-stage biofilm infection, only repetitive combined administration of phages and gentamicin led to a significantly increased survival. Additionally, a significant reduction in number of bacteria was observed in the larvae after receiving repetitive doses of phages and/or gentamicin in both infection models.

Conclusion

Based on our results, a single dose of the combination of phages and gentamicin is sufficient to prevent a haematogenous S. aureus implant-related infection, whereas gentamicin needs to be administered daily for the same effect. To treat early-stage S. aureus implant-related infection, repetitive doses of the combination of phages and gentamicin are required.

Phage therapy in prosthetic joint infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus - A literature review

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are dreaded arthroplasty complications often caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains or biofilm formation, successful treatment remains difficult. Currently, two-stage revision surgery constitutes the gold standard therapy of PJIs, sometimes replaced or supplemented by debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). Given the dire consequences of therapeutic failure, bacteriophage therapy might be another treatment option. Here we provide a comprehensive literature review addressing the efficacy of phages applied against S. aureus as causative agent of PJIs. The included 17 publications had in common that the applied phages proved to be effective against various S. aureus isolates including MRSA even in biofilms. Experiments with mice, rats, rabbits, and moth larvae confirmed favorable features of phage preparations in PJI treatment in vivo; including its synergistic with antibiotics. Case reports of PJI patients unanimously described the bacterial eradication following, alongside other measures, intravenous and intra-articular phage administration. Generally, no major side effects occurred, but in some cases elevated liver transaminases were observed. To conclude, our review compiled promising evidence suggesting the safety and suitability of phage therapy as an adjuvant to DAIR in S. aureus PJIs, and thus, underscores the significance of further research.

Bacteriophage therapy and current delivery strategies for orthopedic infections: A SCOPING review

OBJECTIVES

Interest in phages as adjunctive therapy to treat difficult infections has grown in the last decade. However, phage dosing and delivery for orthopedic infections have not been systematically summarized.

METHODS

Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a SCOPING review through September 1st, 2023, of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central.

RESULTS

In total, 77 studies were included, of which 19 (24.7%) were in vitro studies, 17 (22.1%) were animal studies, and 41 (53.2%) were studies in humans. A total of 137 contemporary patients receiving phage therapy are described.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct phage delivery remains the most studied form of phage therapy, notably in prosthetic joint infections, osteomyelitis, and diabetic foot ulcers. Available evidence describing phage therapy in humans suggests favorable outcomes for orthopedic infections, though this evidence is composed largely of low-level descriptive studies. Several phage delivery devices have been described, though a lack of comparative and in-human evidence limits their therapeutic application. Limitations to the use of phage therapy for orthopedic infections that need to be overcome include a lack of understanding related to optimal dosing and phage pharmacokinetics, bacterial heterogeneity in an infection episode, and phage therapy toxicity.

A Review of Phage Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections

There is a strong rationale for using phages in patients with bone and joint infections (BJIs). Indeed, specific phages can infect and replicate in bacterial pathogens and have also demonstrated their activity in vitro against biofilm produced by different bacteria. However, there is a high variability of the different clinical forms of BJI, and their management is complex and frequently includes surgery followed by the administration of antibiotics. Regardless of the availability of active phages, optimal ways of phage administration in patients with BJIs are unknown. Otherwise, all BJIs are not relevant for phage therapy. Except for diabetic foot infection, a BJI with bone exposure is potentially not a relevant indication for phage therapy. On the counterpart, prosthetic joint infections in patients for whom a multidisciplinary expert team judges a conservative approach as the best option to keep the patient's function seem to be a relevant indication with the hypothesis that phage therapy could increase the rate of infection control. The ESCMID Study Group for Non-traditional Antibacterial Therapy (ESGNTA) was created in 2022. One century after the first use of phages as a therapy, the phage therapy 2.0 era, with the possibility to evaluate personalized phage therapy in modern medicine and orthopedic surgery, is just open.

Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Drug Resistance Development and Novel Strategies to Combat

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a major threat to global health. Infection caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the well-recognized global public health problem globally. In some regions, as many as 90% of S. aureus infections are reported to be MRSA, which cannot be treated with standard antibiotics. WHO reports indicated that MRSA is circulating in every province worldwide, significantly increasing the risk of death by 64% compared to drug-sensitive forms of the infection which is attributed to its antibiotic resistance. The emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant MRSA strains have contributed to its increased prevalence in both healthcare and community settings. The resistance of S. aureus to methicillin is due to expression of penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), which renders it impervious to the action of β-lactam antibiotics including methicillin. The other is through the production of beta-lactamases. Although the treatment options for MRSA are limited, there are promising alternatives to antibiotics to combat the infections. Innovative therapeutic strategies with wide range of activity and modes of action are yet to be explored. The review highlights the global challenges posed by MRSA, elucidates the mechanisms underlying its resistance development, and explores mitigation strategies. Furthermore, it focuses on alternative therapies such as bacteriophages, immunotherapy, nanobiotics, and antimicrobial peptides, emphasizing their synergistic effects and efficacy against MRSA. By examining these alternative approaches, this review provides insights into the potential strategies for tackling MRSA infections and combatting the escalating threat of AMR. Ultimately, a multifaceted approach encompassing both conventional and novel interventions is imperative to mitigate the impact of MRSA and ensure a sustainable future for global healthcare.

Alginate microbeads and hydrogels delivering meropenem and bacteriophages to treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa fracture-related infections

Bacteriophage (phage) therapy has shown promise in treating fracture-related infection (FRI); however, questions remain regarding phage efficacy against biofilms, phage-antibiotic interaction, administration routes and dosing, and the development of phage resistance. The goal of this study was to develop a dual antibiotic-phage delivery system containing hydrogel and alginate microbeads loaded with a phage cocktail plus meropenem and evaluate efficacy against muti-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Two phages (FJK.R9-30 and MK.R3-15) displayed enhanced antibiotic activity against P. aeruginosa biofilms when tested in combination with meropenem. The antimicrobial activity of both antibiotic and phage was retained for eight days at 37 °C in dual phage and antibiotic loaded hydrogel with microbeads (PA-HM). In a mouse FRI model, phages were recovered from all tissues within all treatment groups receiving dual PA-HM. Moreover, animals that received the dual PA-HM either with or without systemic antibiotics had less incidence of phage resistance and less serum neutralization compared to phages in saline. The dual PA-HM could reduce bacterial load in soft tissue when combined with systemic antibiotics, although the infection was not eradicated. The use of alginate microbeads and injectable hydrogel for controlled release of phages and antibiotics, leads to the reduced development of phage resistance and lower exposure to the adaptive immune system, which highlights the translational potential of the dual PA-HM. However, further optimization of phage therapy and its delivery system is necessary to achieve higher bacterial killing activity in vivo in the future.

Phage Therapy as a Novel Therapeutic for the Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections

Solutions for bone and joint infection (BJI) are needed where conventional treatments are inadequate. Bacteriophages (phages) are naturally occurring viruses that infect bacteria and have been harnessed for refractory bone and joint infections (BJI) in many case reports. Here we examine the safety and efficacy of English-language published cases of BJI since 2010 with phage therapy. From 33 reported cases of BJI treated with phage therapy, 29 (87%) achieved microbiological or clinical success, 2 (5.9%) relapsed with the same organisms, and 2 (5.9%) with a different organism. Of these 4 relapses, all but 1 had eventual clinical resolution with additional surgery or phage treatments. Eight out of 33 cases (24%) reported mild, transient adverse events with no serious events reported. Further work is needed to understand the true efficacy of phages and the role of phages in BJI. Opportunities lay ahead for thoughtfully designed clinical trials adapted to individualized therapies.

Phage therapy: a revolutionary shift in the management of bacterial infections, pioneering new horizons in clinical practice, and reimagining the arsenal against microbial pathogens

The recent approval of experimental phage therapies by the FDA and other regulatory bodies with expanded access in cases in the United States and other nations caught the attention of the media and the general public, generating enthusiasm for phage therapy. It started to alter the situation so that more medical professionals are willing to use phage therapies with conventional antibiotics. However, more study is required to fully comprehend phage therapy's potential advantages and restrictions, which is still a relatively new field in medicine. It shows promise, nevertheless, as a secure and prosperous substitute for antibiotics when treating bacterial illnesses in animals and humans. Because of their uniqueness, phage disinfection is excellent for ready-to-eat (RTE) foods like milk, vegetables, and meat products. The traditional farm-to-fork method can be used throughout the food chain to employ bacteriophages to prevent food infections at all production stages. Phage therapy improves clinical outcomes in animal models and lowers bacterial burdens in numerous preclinical investigations. The potential of phage resistance and the need to make sure that enough phages are delivered to the infection site are obstacles to employing phages in vivo. However, according to preclinical studies, phages appear to be a promising alternative to antibiotics for treating bacterial infections in vivo. Phage therapy used with compassion (a profound understanding of and empathy for another's suffering) has recently grown with many case reports of supposedly treated patients and clinical trials. This review summarizes the knowledge on the uses of phages in various fields, such as the food industry, preclinical research, and clinical settings. It also includes a list of FDA-approved bacteriophage-based products, commercial phage products, and a global list of companies that use phages for therapeutic purposes.

The Safety of Bacteriophages in Treatment of Diseases Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

Given the urgency due to the rapid emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, bacteriophages (phages), which are viruses that specifically target and kill bacteria, are rising as a potential alternative to antibiotics. In recent years, researchers have begun to elucidate the safety aspects of phage therapy with the aim of ensuring safe and effective clinical applications. While phage therapy has generally been demonstrated to be safe and tolerable among animals and humans, the current research on phage safety monitoring lacks sufficient and consistent data. This emphasizes the critical need for a standardized phage safety assessment to ensure a more reliable evaluation of its safety profile. Therefore, this review aims to bridge the knowledge gap concerning phage safety for treating MDR bacterial infections by covering various aspects involving phage applications, including phage preparation, administration, and the implications for human health and the environment.

Refractory Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections treated with phage PASA16: A compassionate use case series

BACKGROUND

A growing number of compassionate phage therapy cases were reported in the last decade, with a limited number of clinical trials conducted and few unsuccessful clinical trials reported. There is only a little evidence on the role of phages in refractory infections. Our objective here was to present the largest compassionate-use single-organism/phage case series in 16 patients with non-resolving Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

METHODS

We summarized clinical phage microbiology susceptibility data, administration protocol, clinical data, and outcomes of all cases treated with PASA16 phage. In all intravenous phage administrations, PASA16 phage was manufactured and provided pro bono by Adaptive Phage Therapeutics. PASA16 was administered intravenously, locally to infection site, or by topical use to 16 patients, with data available for 15 patients, mainly with osteoarticular and foreign-device-associated infections.

FINDINGS

A few minor side effects were noted, including elevated liver function enzymes and a transient reduction in white blood cell count. Good clinical outcome was documented in 13 out of 15 patients (86.6%). Two clinical failures were reported. The minimum therapy duration was 8 days with a once- to twice-daily regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

PASA16 with antibiotics was found to be relatively successful in patients for whom traditional treatment approaches have failed previously. Such pre-phase-1 cohorts can outline potential clinical protocols and facilitate the design of future trials.

FUNDING

The study was funded in part by The Israeli Science Foundation IPMP (ISF_1349/20), Rosetrees Trust (A2232), United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (2017123), and the Milgrom Family Support Program.

Current therapies and challenges for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-related infections

Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections and contributes to significant increase in morbidity and mortality especially when associated with medical devices and in biofilm form. Biofilm structure provides a pathway for the enrichment of resistant and persistent phenotypes of S. aureus leading to relapse and recurrence of infection. Minimal diffusion of antibiotics inside biofilm structure leads to heterogeneity and distinct physiological activity. Additionally, horizontal gene transfer between cells in proximity adds to the challenges associated with eradication of biofilms. This narrative review focuses on biofilm-associated infections caused by S. aureus, the impact of environmental conditions on biofilm formation, interactions inside biofilm communities, and the clinical challenges that they present. Conclusively, potential solutions, novel treatment strategies, combination therapies, and reported alternatives are discussed.

The current status of phage therapy and its advancement towards establishing standard antimicrobials for combating multi drug-resistant bacterial pathogens

Phage therapy; a revived antimicrobial weapon, has great therapeutic advantages with the main ones being its ability to eradicate multidrug-resistant pathogens as well as selective toxicity, which ensures that beneficial microbiota is not harmed, unlike antibiotics. These therapeutic properties make phage therapy a novel approach for combating resistant pathogens. Since millions of people across the globe succumb to multidrug-resistant infections, the implementation of phage therapy as a standard antimicrobial could transform global medicine as it offers greater therapeutic advantages than conventional antibiotics. Although phage therapy has incomplete clinical data, such as a lack of standard dosage and the ideal mode of administration, the conducted clinical studies report its safety and efficacy in some case studies, and therefore, this could lessen the concerns of its skeptics. Since its discovery, the development of phage therapeutics has been in a smooth progression. Concerns about phage resistance in populations of pathogenic bacteria are raised when bacteria are exposed to phages. Bacteria can use restriction-modification, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) defense, or mutations in the phage receptors to prevent phage invasion. Phage resistance, however, is often costly for the bacteria and may lead to a reduction in its virulence. The ongoing competition between bacteria and phage, on the other hand, ensures the emergence of phage strains that have evolved to infect resistant bacteria. A phage can quickly adapt by altering one or more aspects of its mode of infection, evading a resistance mechanism through genetic modifications, or directly thwarting the CRISPR-Cas defense. Using phage-bacterium coevolution as a technique could be crucial in the development of phage therapy as well. Through its recent advancement, gene-editing tools such as CRISPR-Cas allow the bioengineering of phages to produce phage cocktails that have broad spectrum activities, which could maximize the treatment's efficacy. This review presents the current state of phage therapy and its progression toward establishing standard medicine for combating antibiotic resistance. Recent clinical trials of phage therapy, some important case studies, and other ongoing clinical studies of phage therapy are all presented in this review. Furthermore, the recent advancement in the development of phage therapeutics, its application in various sectors, and concerns regarding its implementation are also highlighted here. Phage therapy has great potential and could help the fight against drug-resistant bacterial pathogens.

Local Antibiotic Delivery Options in Prosthetic Joint Infection

Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) causes significant morbidity and mortality for patients globally. Delivery of antibiotics to the site of infection has potential to improve the treatment outcomes and enhance biofilm eradication. These antibiotics can be delivered using an intra-articular catheter or combined with a carrier substance to enhance pharmacokinetic properties. Carrier options include non-resorbable polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement and resorbable calcium sulphate, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, and hydrogels. PMMA allows for creation of structural spacers used in multi-stage revision procedures, however it requires subsequent removal and antibiotic compatibility and the levels delivered are variable. Calcium sulphate is the most researched resorbable carrier in PJI, but is associated with wound leakage and hypercalcaemia, and clinical evidence for its effectiveness remains at the early stage. Hydrogels provide a versatile combability with antibiotics and adjustable elution profiles, but clinical usage is currently limited. Novel anti-biofilm therapies include bacteriophages which have been used successfully in small case series.

A Century of Clinical Use of Phages: A Literature Review

Growing antibiotic resistance and the broken antibiotic market have renewed interest in the use of phages, a century-old therapy that fell into oblivion in the West after two decades of promising results. This literature review with a particular focus on French literature aims to complement current scientific databases with medical and non-medical publications on the clinical use of phages. While several cases of successful treatment with phages have been reported, prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of this therapy.

Bacteria of Zoonotic Interest Identified on Edible Freshwater Fish Imported to Australia

Previous research has shown that freshwater edible fish imported into Australia are not compliant with Australian importation guidelines and as a result may be high risk for bacterial contamination. In the present study, the outer surface of imported freshwater fish were swabbed, cultured, confirmatory tests performed and antimicrobial patterns investigated. Channidae fish (Sp. A/n = 66) were contaminated with zoonotic Salmonella sp./Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1/66) and other bacteria implicated in cases of opportunistic human infection, these being Pseudomonas sp. (including P. mendocina and P. pseudoalcaligenes (n = 34/66)); Micrococcus sp. (n = 32/66); Comamonas testosteroni (n = 27/66) and Rhizobium radiobacter (n = 3/66). Pangasiidae fish (Species B/n = 47) were contaminated with zoonotic Vibrio fluvialis (n = 10/47); Salmonella sp. (n = 6/47) and environmental bacteria Micrococcus sp. (n = 3/47). One sample was resistant to all antimicrobials tested and is considered to be Methicillin Resistant S. aureus. Mud, natural diet, or vegetation identified in Sp. A fish/or packaging were significantly associated with the presence of Pseudomonas spp. The study also showed that visibly clean fish (Sp. B) may harbour zoonotic bacteria and that certain types of bacteria are common to fish groups, preparations, and contaminants. Further investigations are required to support the development of appropriate food safety recommendations in Australia.

Application of Phage Therapy in a Case of a Chronic Hip-Prosthetic Joint Infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An Italian Real-Life Experience and In Vitro Analysis

Background

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa represents a severe complication in orthopedic surgery. We report the case of a patient with chronic PJI from P. aeruginosa successfully treated with personalized phage therapy (PT) in combination with meropenem.

Methods

A 62-year-old woman was affected by a chronic right hip prosthesis infection caused by P. aeruginosa since 2016 . The patient was treated with phage Pa53 (I day 10 mL q8h, then 5 mL q8h via joint drainage for 2 weeks) in association with meropenem (2gr q12h iv) after a surgical procedure. A 2-year clinical follow up was performed. An in vitro bactericidal assay of the phage alone and in combination with meropenem against a 24-hour-old biofilm of bacterial isolate was also carried out.

Results

No severe adverse events were observed during PT. Two years after suspension, there were no clinical signs of infection relapse, and a marked leukocyte scan showed no pathological uptake areas. In vitro studies showed that the minimum biofilm eradicating concentration of meropenem was 8 µg/mL. No biofilm eradication was observed at 24 hours incubation with phages alone (10⁸ plaque-forming units [PFU]/mL). However, the addition of meropenem at suberadicating concentration (1 µg/mL) to phages at lower titer (10³PFU/mL) resulted in a synergistic eradication after 24 hours of incubation.

Conclusions

Personalized PT, in combination with meropenem, was found to be safe and effective in eradicating P. aeruginosa infection. These data encourage the development of personalized clinical studies aimed at evaluating the efficacy of PT as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy for chronic persistent infections.

Bacteriophage therapy for human musculoskeletal and skin/soft tissue infections

BACKGROUND

Bacteriophage therapy has a long history in the treatment of musculoskeletal and skin/soft tissue infections, particularly in the former Soviet Union. Due to the global rise in antimicrobial resistance, phage application has experienced a resurgence of interest and expanded to many countries.

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review aims to provide clinical microbiologists, infectious disease specialists and surgeons a brief history of bacteriophage therapy for human musculoskeletal and soft tissue infections, as well as data on current practices and ongoing clinical studies.

SOURCES

A search of PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed to identify relevant studies. Search terms were 'bacteriophage therapy', 'musculoskeletal infection' and 'soft tissue infection'. The bibliography of all retrieved articles was checked for additional relevant references.

CONTENT

Past and current data on the use of bacteriophage therapy for human musculoskeletal, skin and soft tissue infections are evaluated. Moreover, we present the clinical trials registered in public databases. Based on current clinical experience and data, several scenarios of bacteriophage application for human therapy are examined. Finally, we discuss legislative hurdles in the regulatory approval process and present future perspectives for bacteriophage therapy.

IMPLICATIONS

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the most important global public health challenges. Several different alternatives to conventional antibiotics are under development; bacteriophage therapy is one of them. Currently, therapeutic use of phages is restrained by regulatory hurdles and largely limited to sporadic authorization in compassionate use or under temporary approval as new drugs in Europe and the US. Although bacteriophage therapy seems to be safe and clinical results of phage treatment are promising, future data from high-quality (randomized controlled) trials could provide a better understanding of the reasonable minimal criteria required for expansion of bacteriophage therapy.

Bacteriophage therapy in infection after fracture fixation (IAFF) in orthopaedic surgery

Infection after fracture fixation (IAFF) in orthopaedic surgery is a significant complication that can lead to disability due to chronic infection and/or relapsing disease, non-union necessitating revision surgery. Management of IAFF is a major challenge facing orthopaedic surgeons across the world due to two key pathogenic mechanisms of Biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) against traditional antibiotics. Advanced prophylactic and treatment strategies to help eradicate established infections and prevent the development of such infections are necessary. Bacteriophage therapy represents an innovative modality to treat IAFF due to multi-drug resistant organisms. We assess the current role and potential therapeutic applications of the novel bacteriophage therapy in the management of these recalcitrant infections to achieve a successful outcome.

Phage-Based Control of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Galleria mellonella Model of Implant-Associated Infection

Staphylococcus aureus implant-associated infections are difficult to treat because of the ability of bacteria to form biofilm on medical devices. Here, the efficacy of Sb-1 to control or prevent S. aureus colonization on medical foreign bodies was investigated in a Galleria mellonella larval infection model. For colonization control assays, sterile K-wires were implanted into larva prolegs. After 2 days, larvae were infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus ATCC 43300 and incubated at 37 °C for a further 2 days, when treatments with either daptomycin (4 mg/kg), Sb-1 (10⁷ PFUs) or a combination of them (3 x/day) were started. For biofilm prevention assays, larvae were pre-treated with either vancomycin (10 mg/kg) or Sb-1 (10⁷ PFUs) before the S. aureus infection. In both experimental settings, K-wires were explanted for colony counting two days after treatment. In comparison to the untreated control, more than a 4 log¹⁰ CFU and 1 log¹⁰ CFU reduction was observed on K-wires recovered from larvae treated with the Sb-1/daptomycin combination and with their singular administration, respectively. Moreover, pre-infection treatment with Sb-1 was found to prevent K-wire colonization, similarly to vancomycin. Taken together, the obtained results demonstrated the strong potential of the Sb-1 antibiotic combinatory administration or the Sb-1 pretreatment to control or prevent S. aureus-associated implant infections.

Bacteriophage Therapy in Implant-Related Orthopedic Infections

Biofilm producers pose a major challenge in treating implant-related orthopedic infections (IROIs). The incidence of IROIs for the closed fracture amounts to 1% to 2% whereas for open fracture it is up to 30%. Due to inappropriate and irrational use of antibiotics in the management of infections, there is an emergence of a global "antimicrobial resistance crisis". To combat these antimicrobial resistance crises, a few innovative and targeted therapies like nanomedicine, phage therapy, antimicrobial peptides, and sonic therapies have been introduced. In this review, we have detailed the basic mechanisms involved in the employment of bacteriophage therapy for IROIs, along with the preclinical and clinical data on its utility. We also present the guidelines on its regulation, processing, and limitations of bacteriophage therpay to combat the upcoming era of antibiotic resistance.

Bacteriophage Therapy for Staphylococcus Aureus Infections: A Review of Animal Models, Treatments, and Clinical Trials

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a common and virulent human pathogen causing several serious illnesses including skin abscesses, wound infections, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, pneumonia, and toxic shock syndrome. Antibiotics were first introduced in the 1940s, leading to the belief that bacterial illnesses would be eradicated. However, microorganisms, including S. aureus, began to develop antibiotic resistance from the increased use and abuse of antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance is now one of the most serious threats to global public health. Bacteria like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remain a major problem despite several efforts to find new antibiotics. New treatment approaches are required, with bacteriophage treatment, a non-antibiotic strategy to treat bacterial infections, showing particular promise. The ability of S. aureus to resist a wide range of antibiotics makes it an ideal candidate for phage therapy studies. Bacteriophages have a relatively restricted range of action, enabling them to target pathogenic bacteria. Their usage, usually in the form of a cocktail of bacteriophages, allows for more focused treatment while also overcoming the emergence of resistance. However, many obstacles remain, particularly in terms of their effects in vivo, necessitating the development of animal models to assess the bacteriophage efficiency. Here, we provide a review of the animal models, the various clinical case treatments, and clinical trials for S. aureus phage therapy.

Essential Topics for the Regulatory Consideration of Phages as Clinically Valuable Therapeutic Agents: A Perspective from Spain

Antibiotic resistance is one of the major challenges that humankind shall face in the short term. (Bacterio)phage therapy is a valuable therapeutic alternative to antibiotics and, although the concept is almost as old as the discovery of phages, its wide application was hindered in the West by the discovery and development of antibiotics in the mid-twentieth century. However, research on phage therapy is currently experiencing a renaissance due to the antimicrobial resistance problem. Some countries are already adopting new ad hoc regulations to favor the short-term implantation of phage therapy in clinical practice. In this regard, the Phage Therapy Work Group from FAGOMA (Spanish Network of Bacteriophages and Transducing Elements) recently contacted the Spanish Drugs and Medical Devices Agency (AEMPS) to promote the regulation of phage therapy in Spain. As a result, FAGOMA was asked to provide a general view on key issues regarding phage therapy legislation. This review comes as the culmination of the FAGOMA initiative and aims at appropriately informing the regulatory debate on phage therapy.

Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice

Increasing antimicrobial resistance and medical device-related infections have led to a renewed interest in phage therapy as an alternative or adjunct to conventional antimicrobials. Expanded access and compassionate use cases have risen exponentially but have varied widely in approach, methodology, and clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered. Large gaps in knowledge contribute to heterogeneity in approach and lack of consensus in many important clinical areas. The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) has convened a panel of experts in phage therapy, clinical microbiology, infectious diseases, and pharmacology, who worked with regulatory experts and a funding agency to identify questions based on a clinical framework and divided them into three themes: potential clinical situations in which phage therapy might be considered, laboratory testing, and pharmacokinetic considerations. Suggestions are provided as answers to a series of questions intended to inform clinicians considering experimental phage therapy for patients in their clinical practices.

Immune Response of an Oral Enterococcus faecalis Phage Cocktail in a Mouse Model of Ethanol-Induced Liver Disease

Cytolysin-positive Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) cause more severe alcohol-associated hepatitis, and phages might be used to specifically target these bacteria in a clinical trial. Using a humanized mouse model of ethanol-induced liver disease, the effect of cytolytic E. faecalis phage treatment on the intestinal and liver immune response was evaluated. The observed immune response was predominantly anti-inflammatory and tissue-restoring. Besides, live phages could be readily recovered from the serum, spleen, and liver following oral gavage in ethanol-fed mice. We also isolated 20 new phages from the sewage water; six of them exhibited a relatively broad host range. Taken together, the oral administration of cytolytic E. faecalis phages leads to the translocation of phages to the systemic circulation and appears to be safe, following chronic-binge ethanol administration. A cocktail of three phages covers the majority of tested cytolysin-positive E. faecalis strains and could be tested in a clinical trial.

Progress in Alternative Strategies to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance: Focus on Antibiotics

Antibiotic resistance, and, in a broader perspective, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), continues to evolve and spread beyond all boundaries. As a result, infectious diseases have become more challenging or even impossible to treat, leading to an increase in morbidity and mortality. Despite the failure of conventional, traditional antimicrobial therapy, in the past two decades, no novel class of antibiotics has been introduced. Consequently, several novel alternative strategies to combat these (multi-) drug-resistant infectious microorganisms have been identified. The purpose of this review is to gather and consider the strategies that are being applied or proposed as potential alternatives to traditional antibiotics. These strategies include combination therapy, techniques that target the enzymes or proteins responsible for antimicrobial resistance, resistant bacteria, drug delivery systems, physicochemical methods, and unconventional techniques, including the CRISPR-Cas system. These alternative strategies may have the potential to change the treatment of multi-drug-resistant pathogens in human clinical settings.

Phage Activity against Planktonic and Biofilm Staphylococcus aureus Periprosthetic Joint Infection Isolates

We recently reported the successful treatment of a case of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with phage. Phage activity against bacteria causing PJI has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we examined the in vitro activity of seven phages against 122 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus recovered between April 1999 and February 2018 from subjects with PJI. Phages were assessed against planktonic and biofilm phenotypes. Activity of individual phages was demonstrated against up to 73% of bacterial isolates in the planktonic state and up to 100% of biofilms formed by isolates that were planktonically phage susceptible. Susceptibility to phage was not correlated with small-colony-variant phenotype for planktonic or biofilm bacteria; correlation between antibiotic susceptibility and planktonic phage susceptibility and between biofilm phage susceptibility and strength of biofilm formation were noted under select conditions. These results demonstrate that phages can infect S. aureus causing PJI in both planktonic and biofilm phenotypes, and thus are worthy of investigation as an alternative or addition to antibiotics in this setting.

[Phage therapy of purulent-inflammatory pathology of the outer and middle ear]

The steady growth of antibiotic resistance of bacteria and, as a result, difficulties in selecting effective drugs determine the search for an alternative strategy for the use of antimicrobials, and therapy based on the use of bacteriophages is such. Phage therapy in otorhinolaryngology is actively used for the treatment of rhinosinusitis, diseases of the pharynx and larynx. However, it should be noted that the use of this group of drugs in the treatment of ear diseases is not sufficiently covered. Currently, institutes and clinics around the world are undergoing many large multicenter studies aimed not only at finding effective bacteriophages against antibiotic-resistant bacteria, but also at isolating their enzymes (lysines), expression of transport proteins, genetic modifications that lead to the restoration of the sensitivity of bacteria to antimicrobial drugs. In this review, we sought to highlight modern works concerning the treatment of inflammatory ear diseases with bacteriophage preparations, the results of microbiological studies conducted in vitro, the main purpose of which was to combat multi-resistant strains of microorganisms - pathogens of purulent-inflammatory diseases of the outer and middle ear.

Bacteriophage Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Fracture-Related Infection Caused by Staphylococcus aureus: a Preclinical Study

Although several studies have shown promising clinical outcomes of phage therapy in patients with orthopedic device-related infections, questions remain regarding the optimal application protocol, systemic effects, and the impact of the immune response. This study provides a proof-of-concept of phage therapy in a clinically relevant rabbit model of fracture-related infection (FRI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus. In a prevention setting, phage in saline (without any biomaterial-based carrier) was highly effective in the prevention of FRI, compared to systemic antibiotic prophylaxis alone. In the subsequent study involving treatment of established infection, daily administration of phage in saline through a subcutaneous access tube was compared to a single intraoperative application of a phage-loaded hydrogel and a control group receiving antibiotics only. In this setting, although a possible trend of bacterial load reduction on the implant was observed with the phage-loaded hydrogel, no superior effect of phage therapy was found compared to antibiotic treatment alone. The application of phage in saline through a subcutaneous access tube was, however, complicated by superinfection and the development of neutralizing antibodies. The latter was not found in the animals that received the phage-loaded hydrogel, which may indicate that encapsulation of phages into a carrier such as a hydrogel limits their exposure to the adaptive immune system. These studies show phage therapy can be useful in targeting orthopedic device-related infection, however, further research and improvements of these application methods are required for this complex clinical setting. IMPORTANCE Because of the growing spread of antimicrobial resistance, the use of alternative prevention and treatment strategies is gaining interest. Although the therapeutic potential of bacteriophages has been demonstrated in a number of case reports and series over the past decade, many unanswered questions remain regarding the optimal application protocol. Furthermore, a major concern during phage therapy is the induction of phage neutralizing antibodies. This study aimed at providing a proof-of-concept of phage therapy in a clinically relevant rabbit model of fracture-related infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Phage therapy was applied as prophylaxis in a first phase, and as treatment of an established infection in a second phase. The development of phage neutralizing antibodies was evaluated in the treatment study. This study demonstrates that phage therapy can be useful in targeting orthopedic device-related infection, especially as prophylaxis; however, further research and improvements of these application methods are required.

Past and Future of Phage Therapy and Phage-Derived Proteins in Patients with Bone and Joint Infection

Phage-derived therapies comprise phage therapy and the use of phage-derived proteins as anti-bacterial therapy. Bacteriophages are natural viruses that target specific bacteria. They were proposed to be used to treat bacterial infections in the 1920s, before the discovery and widespread over-commercialized use of antibiotics. Phage therapy was totally abandoned in Western countries, whereas it is still used in Poland, Georgia and Russia. We review here the history of phage therapy by focusing on bone and joint infection, and on the development of phage therapy in France in this indication. We discuss the rationale of its use in bacterial infection and show the feasibility of phage therapy in the 2020s, based on several patients with complex bone and joint infection who recently received phages as compassionate therapy. Although the status of phage therapy remains to be clarified by health care authorities, obtaining pharmaceutical-grade therapeutic phages (i.e., following good manufacturing practice guidelines or being “GMP-like”) targeting bacterial species of concern is essential. Moreover, multidisciplinary clinical expertise has to determine what could be the relevant indications to perform clinical trials. Finally “phage therapy 2.0” has to integrate the following steps: (i) follow the status of phage therapy, that is not settled and defined; (ii) develop in each country a close relationship with the national health care authority; (iii) develop industrial–academic partnerships; (iv) create academic reference centers; (v) identify relevant clinical indications; (vi) use GMP/GMP-like phages with guaranteed quality bioproduction; (vii) start as salvage therapy; (vii) combine with antibiotics and adequate surgery; and (viii) perform clinical trials, to finally (ix) demonstrate in which clinical settings phage therapy provides benefit. Phage-derived proteins such as peptidoglycan hydrolases, polysaccharide depolymerases or lysins are enzymes that also have anti-biofilm activity. In contrast to phages, their development has to follow the classical process of medicinal products. Phage therapy and phage-derived products also have a huge potential to treat biofilm-associated bacterial diseases, and this is of crucial importance in the worldwide spread of antimicrobial resistance.

A systematic review of phage therapy applied to bone and joint infections: an analysis of success rates, treatment modalities and safety

Bone and joint infections are difficult to treat, and increasing antibiotic resistance has only made them more challenging. This has led to renewed interest in phage therapy (PT). The aim of this systematic review was to determine success rate, current treatment modalities and safety of PT in bone and joint infections.A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases as well as the journal PHAGE for literature published between January 2000 and April 2021 was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify all human studies assessing bacteriophages as therapy for bone and joint infections. All study designs and patient populations were eligible. The review's primary outcome was success rate.Twenty records describing a total of 51 patients and 52 treatment episodes were included. No randomized controlled studies were identified. The overall success rate was 71% (n = 37/52). Topical administration alone was the most frequent administration route (85%, n = 44/52). Antibiotics were administered concomitantly with PT in the majority of treatments (79%, n = 41/52), and surgery was performed for 87% (n = 45/52) of treatment episodes. Four minor adverse events related to PT were reported, representing 8% (n = 4/52) of treatment episodes.PT for bone and joint infections has not been evaluated in any randomized controlled clinical study, and current administration modalities are highly variable between case reports and case series. While publications included here show potential benefit and few adverse effects, clinical trials are warranted to assess the efficacy of PT for bone and joint infections and determine optimal treatment modalities. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1148-1156. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210073.

Phage therapeutics: from promises to practices and prospectives

The rise in multi-drug resistant bacteria and the inability to develop novel antibacterial agents limits our arsenal against infectious diseases. Antibiotic resistance is a global issue requiring an immediate solution, including the development of new antibiotic molecules and other alternative modes of therapy. This article highlights the mechanism of bacteriophage treatment that makes it a real solution for multidrug-resistant infectious diseases. Several case reports identified phage therapy as a potential solution to the emerging challenge of multi-drug resistance. Bacteriophages, unlike antibiotics, have special features, such as host specificity and do not impact other commensals. A new outlook has also arisen with recent advancements in the understanding of phage immunobiology, where phages are repurposed against both bacterial and viral infections. Thus, the potential possibility of phages in COVID-19 patients with secondary bacterial infections has been briefly elucidated. However, significant obstacles that need to be addressed are to design better clinical studies that may contribute to the widespread use of bacteriophage therapy against multi-drug resistant pathogens. In conclusion, antibacterial agents can be used with bacteriophages, i.e. bacteriophage-antibiotic combination therapy, or they can be administered alone in cases when antibiotics are ineffective.Key points• AMR, a consequence of antibiotic generated menace globally, has led to the resurgence of phage therapy as an effective and sustainable solution without any side effects and high specificity against refractory MDR bacterial infections.• Bacteriophages have fewer adverse reactions and can thus be used as monotherapy as well as in conjunction with antibiotics.• In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, phage therapy may be a viable option.

Friends or Foes? Rapid Determination of Dissimilar Colistin and Ciprofloxacin Antagonism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Phages

Phage therapy is a century-old technique employing viruses (phages) to treat bacterial infections, and in the clinic it is often used in combination with antibiotics. Antibiotics, however, interfere with critical bacterial metabolic activities that can be required by phages. Explicit testing of antibiotic antagonism of phage infection activities, though, is not a common feature of phage therapy studies. Here we use optical density-based 'lysis-profile' assays to assess the impact of two antibiotics, colistin and ciprofloxacin, on the bactericidal, bacteriolytic, and new-virion-production activities of three Pseudomonas aeruginosa phages. Though phages and antibiotics in combination are more potent in killing P. aeruginosa than either acting alone, colistin nevertheless substantially interferes with phage bacteriolytic and virion-production activities even at its minimum inhibitory concentration (1× MIC). Ciprofloxacin, by contrast, has little anti-phage impact at 1× or 3× MIC. We corroborate these results with more traditional measures, particularly colony-forming units, plaque-forming units, and one-step growth experiments. Our results suggest that ciprofloxacin could be useful as a concurrent phage therapy co-treatment especially when phage replication is required for treatment success. Lysis-profile assays also appear to be useful, fast, and high-throughput means of assessing antibiotic antagonism of phage infection activities.

Phage Therapy in the 21st Century: Is There Modern, Clinical Evidence of Phage-Mediated Efficacy?

Many bacteriophages are obligate killers of bacteria. That this property could be medically useful was first recognized over one hundred years ago, with 2021 being the 100-year anniversary of the first clinical phage therapy publication. Here we consider modern use of phages in clinical settings. Our aim is to answer one question: do phages serve as effective anti-bacterial infection agents when used clinically? An important emphasis of our analyses is on whether phage therapy-associated anti-bacterial infection efficacy can be reasonably distinguished from that associated with often coadministered antibiotics. We find that about half of 70 human phage treatment reports-published in English thus far in the 2000s-are suggestive of phage-mediated anti-bacterial infection efficacy. Two of these are randomized, double-blinded, infection-treatment studies while 14 of those studies, in our opinion, provide superior evidence of a phage role in observed treatment successes. Roughly three-quarters of these potentially phage-mediated outcomes are based on microbiological as well as clinical results, with the rest based on clinical success. Since many of these phage treatments are of infections for which antibiotic therapy had not been successful, their collective effectiveness is suggestive of a valid utility in employing phages to treat otherwise difficult-to-cure bacterial infections.

Nanotechnology Based Approaches in Phage Therapy: Overcoming the Pharmacological Barriers

With the emergence and spread of global antibiotic resistance and the need for searching safer alternatives, there has been resurgence in exploring the use of bacteriophages in the treatment of bacterial infections referred as phage therapy. Although modern phage therapy has come a long way as demonstrated by numerous efficacy studies but the fact remains that till date, phage therapy has not received regulatory approval for human use (except for compassionate use).Thus, to hit the clinical market, the roadblocks need to be seriously addressed and gaps mended with modern solution based technologies. Nanotechnology represents one such ideal and powerful tool for overcoming the pharmacological barriers (low stability, poor in-vivo retention, targeted delivery, neutralisation by immune system etc.) of administered phage preparations.In literature, there are many review articles on nanotechnology and bacteriophages but these are primarily focussed on highlighting the use of lytic and temperate phages in different fields of nano-medicine such as nanoprobes, nanosensors, cancer diagnostics, cancer cell targeting, drug delivery through phage receptors, phage display etc. Reviews specifically focused on the use of nanotechnology driven techniques strictly to improve phage therapy are however limited. Moreover, these review if present have primarily focussed on discussing encapsulation as a primary method for improving the stability and retention of phage(s) in the body.With new advances made in the field of nanotechnology, approaches extend from mere encapsulation to recently adopted newer strategies. The present review gives a detailed insight into the more recent strategies which include 1) use of lipid based nano-carriers (liposomes, transfersomes etc.) 2) adopting microfluidic based approach, surface modification methods to further enhance the efficiency and stability of phage loaded liposomes 3) Nano- emulsification approach with integration of microfluidics for producing multiple emulsions (suitable for phage cocktails) with unique control over size, shape and drop morphology 4) Phage loaded nanofibers produced by electro-spinning and advanced core shell nanofibers for immediate, biphasic and delayed release systems and 5) Smart release drug delivery platforms that allow superior control over dosing and phage release as and when required. All these new advances are aimed at creating a suitable housing system for therapeutic bacteriophage preparations while targeting the multiple issues of phage therapy i.e., improving phage stability and titers, improving in-vivo retention times, acting as suitable delivery systems for sustained release at target site of infection, improved penetration into biofilms and protection from immune cell attack. The present review thus aims at giving a complete insight into the recent advances (2010 onwards) related to various nanotechnology based approaches to address the issues pertaining to phage therapy. This is essential for improving the overall therapeutic index and success of phage therapy for future clinical approval.

[Treatment of bone and periprosthetic infections with bacteriophages : A systematic review]

Hintergrund

Die Behandlung von Knochen- und Protheseninfektionen bleibt trotz moderner Behandlungskonzepte mit interdisziplinärem Therapieansatz schwierig und weitere Maßnahmen zur Verbesserung des Behandlungsergebnisses sind wünschenswert. Präklinischen Studien liefern ein vielversprechendes Bild der Wirksamkeit von Bakteriophagen zur Behandlung von Knochen- und Protheseninfektionen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Die vorliegende Arbeit gibt eine systematische Übersicht über die klinische Anwendung von Bakteriophagen zur Behandlung von Knochen- und Protheseninfektionen.

Material und Methoden

Eine systematische Suche wurde in PubMed zur Identifikation von primären klinischen Daten zur Anwendung der Phagentherapie bei Patienten mit Knochen- und Protheseninfektion durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

Elf Studien wurden eingeschlossen, bestehend aus 8 Fallberichten und 3 Fallserien. Indikationen der Phagentherapie waren periprothetische Infektionen (n = 12, 52,2 %), frakturassoziierte Infektionen (n = 9, 39,1 %), Osteomyelitis (n = 1, 4,4 %) und eine Iliosakralgelenkinfektion nach Zementaugmentation einer Metastase (n = 1, 4,4 %). Die Interventionen waren heterogen, Phagen wurden intravenös verabreicht, intraoperativ ins Gelenk injiziert, intraoperativ lokal angewendet oder über Drainagen appliziert. In Kombination mit Antibiotikatherapie konnte eine vollständige Infekteradikation bei 18 Patienten (78,3 %) erreicht werden. Bei 91,3 % der Patienten wurden keine Nebenwirkungen berichtet.

Schlussfolgerung

Bakteriophagen sind eine vielversprechende Behandlungsmethode von Knochen- und Protheseninfektionen in Kombination mit einer Antibiotikatherapie. Zukünftige klinische Studien mit höherem Evidenzgrad werden benötigt, um eine erfolgreiche Translation der Bakteriophagentherapie in die klinische Praxis weiter zu etablieren.