Culture-positive and culture-negative endocarditis in patients with cancer: a retrospective observational study, 1994-2004

Unexpected Infective Endocarditis: Towards a New Alert for Clinicians

Despite the clear indications and worldwide application of specific guidelines, the recognition of Infective Endocarditis (IE) may be challenging in day-to-day clinical practice. Significant changes in the epidemiological and clinical profile of IE have been observed, including variations in the populations at risk and an increased incidence in subjects without at-risk cardiac disease. Emergent at-risk populations for IE particularly include immunocompromised patients with a comorbidity burden (e.g., cancer, diabetes, dialysis), requiring long-term central venous catheters or recurrent healthcare interventions. In addition, healthy subjects, such as skin-contact athletes or those with piercing implants, may be exposed to the transmission of highly virulent bacteria (through the skin or mucous), determining endothelial lesions and subsequent IE, despite the absence of pre-existing at-risk cardiac disease. Emergent at-risk populations and clinical presentation changes may subvert the conventional paradigm of IE toward an unexpected clinical scenario. Owing to its unusual clinical context, IE might be overlooked, resulting in a challenging diagnosis and delayed treatment. This review, supported by a series of clinical cases, analyzed the subtle and deceptive phenotypes subtending the complex syndrome of unexpected IE. The awareness of an unexpected clinical course should alert clinicians to also consider IE diagnosis in patients with atypical features, enhancing vigilance for preventive measures in an emergent at-risk population untargeted by conventional workflows.

Infective endocarditis is rare in patients with hematologic malignancy and neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious complication of bloodstream infections (BSIs) that occurs at variable rates depending on the pathogen and clinical setting. There is a paucity of data describing the risk of IE in patients with hematologic malignancy who develop bacteremia while neutropenic.

METHODS

Adult patients on the hematology ward from January 2018 to December 2020 with hematologic malignancy and bacteremia were evaluated retrospectively for endocarditis by applying the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria. Charts of possible cases were evaluated 90 days after the initial BSI for new infectious complications that could indicate missed IE. Descriptive statistics compared patients admitted for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to those admitted for alternative reasons (non-HSCT).

RESULTS

Among the 1005 positive blood cultures initially identified, there were 66 episodes in 65 patients with hematologic malignancy and at least grade 3 neutropenia for a mean duration of 11.4 days during their admission. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed in 34.8% of BSIs, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in 6.1%. There were no new infectious complications in possible cases 90 days after their initial BSI. No cases of endocarditis were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocarditis is rare amongst patients with hematologic malignancy, bacteremia, and neutropenia, and no cases were identified in this cohort. The use of routine TTE in this setting seems unwarranted, and the addition of TEE is unlikely to improve patient-centered outcomes.

Utility of Echocardiogram in Neutropenic Patients with Gram-Positive Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Hemato-oncology patients are vulnerable to bloodstream infections due to immunocompromised state and use of intravascular catheters. Data regarding risk of infective endocarditis (IE) among those with gram-positive bacteremia are limited. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of IE among neutropenic hemato-oncology patients and explore the yield of echocardiogram in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a single retrospective study of all hospitalized hemato-oncology neutropenic patients with gram-positive blood cultures between 2007 and 2021. Data regarding patients' characteristics, blood cultures, and echocardiogram were collected.

RESULTS

The study included 241 patients, with 283 isolates. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CONS) was the most commonly isolate found, followed by Streptococcus viridans. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed in 45% of patients overall, of which 5.8% had additional transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Only a single case of IE was identified in a 47-year-old multiple myeloma patient with neutropenic fever, S. viridans bacteremia, and stroke caused by septic emboli. TTE and TEE failed to demonstrate valvular pathology consistent with IE.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, the yield of echocardiogram in hemato-oncological neutropenic patients with bacteremia is extremely low, owing to reduced probability of IE in this population, and thus could be avoided in most cases.

Clinicopathological differences between Bartonella and other bacterial endocarditis-related glomerulonephritis - our experience and a pooled analysis

Background

Although Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of acute infective endocarditis (IE) in adults, Bartonella spp. has concomitantly emerged as the leading cause of "blood culture-negative IE" (BCNE). Pre-disposing factors, clinical presentation and kidney biopsy findings in Bartonella IE-associated glomerulonephritis (GN) show subtle differences and some unique features relative to other bacterial infection-related GNs. We highlight these features along with key diagnostic clues and management approach in Bartonella IE-associated GN.

Methods

We conducted a pooled analysis of 89 cases of Bartonella IE-associated GN (54 published case reports and case series; 18 published conference abstracts identified using an English literature search of several commonly used literature search modalities); and four unpublished cases from our institution.

Results

Bartonella henselae and Bartonella quintana are the most commonly implicated species causing IE in humans. Subacute presentation, affecting damaged native and/or prosthetic heart valves, high titer anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), mainly proteinase-3 (PR-3) specificity, fastidious nature and lack of positive blood cultures of these Gram-negative bacilli, a higher frequency of focal glomerular crescents compared to other bacterial infection-related GNs are some of the salient features of Bartonella IE-associated GN. C3-dominant, but frequent C1q and IgM immunofluorescence staining is seen on biopsy. A "full-house" immunofluorescence staining pattern is also described but can be seen in IE -associated GN due to other bacteria as well. Non-specific generalized symptoms, cytopenia, heart failure and other organ damage due to embolic phenomena are the highlights on clinical presentation needing a multi-disciplinary approach for management. Awareness of the updated modified Duke criteria for IE, a high index of suspicion for underlying infection despite negative microbiologic cultures, history of exposure to animals, particularly infected cats, and use of send-out serologic tests for Bartonella spp. early in the course of management can help in early diagnosis and initiation of appropriate treatment.

Conclusion

Diagnosis of IE-associated GN can be challenging particularly with BCNE. The number of Bartonella IE-associated GN cases in a single institution tends to be less than IE due to gram positive cocci, however Bartonella is currently the leading cause of BCNE. We provide a much-needed discussion on this topic.

Non-bacterial Thrombotic Endocarditis as a Rare Manifestation of Early Stage Gastric Cancer

Endocarditis is an inflammation of the endocardium and is characterized by the presence of vegetation, which may occur in the context of infectious or non-infectious diseases. Despite the higher rate of infective endocarditis diagnosis, it may also surge in other non-infectious conditions such as cancer or chronic inflammatory syndromes. Cancer defines a hypercoagulable state, and cancer-associated thrombophilia can have a diverse clinical presentation, most commonly venous thromboembolism and rarely non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE). The diagnosis of NBTE is difficult and requires a high level of suspicion. The treatment relies on anticoagulant therapy, control of underlying disease, and valve replacement when applied. Independently of the etiology, without treatment, endocarditis may lead to valve dysfunction and to the worst prognosis. In this paper, we describe a case of a patient with persistent fever and NBTE of the tricuspid valve, disclosing a rare presentation of gastric cancer.

Malignancy and Endocarditis: Divulging Into the Intertwined Association

Cancer is an immunosuppressive disorder with characteristic features of unchecked cell growth, invasion, and sometimes thromboembolism leading to multiple systemic sequelae, including infective endocarditis. This article has compiled some of the crucial mechanisms by which infective endocarditis occurs in cancer patients, its risk factors, and the existing treatment interventions. It has focused on the necessity of being aware that these multiple pathogeneses are involved in the development of infective endocarditis (IE) in cancer patients, which would help delineate the risk factors associated with the condition and help physicians screen better for specific red flags. Identifying these risk factors and patient-oriented therapy, targeting the necessary elements such as causative organism, patient immune status, type of cancer, choosing evidence-based treatment modalities, and to improve the outcome of the disease in an already exasperating condition called cancer.

Characteristics of infective endocarditis in a cancer population

Background

Infective endocarditis (IE) is more common in patients with cancer as compared with the general population. Due to an immunocompromised state, the need for invasive procedures, hypercoagulability and the presence of indwelling catheters, patients with cancer are particularly predisposed to the development of IE.

Objectives

Limited information exists about IE in patients with cancer. We aimed to evaluate the characteristics of patients with cancer and IE at our tertiary care centre, including a comparison of the microorganisms implicated and their association with mortality.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients with cancer who had echocardiography for suspicion of endocarditis was conducted. A total of 56 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer and endocarditis, based on the modified Duke criteria, were included in the study. Baseline demographics, risk factors for developing IE, echocardiography findings, microbiology and mortality data were analysed.

Results

Following the findings of vegetations by echocardiography, the median survival time was 8.5 months. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism identified as causing endocarditis. The mitral and aortic valves were the most commonly involved sites of endocarditis. Patients with S. aureus endocarditis (SAE) had a significantly poorer survival when compared with patients without SAE (p=0.0217) over the 12-month period from diagnosis of endocarditis.

Conclusions

Overall survival of patients with cancer and endocarditis is poor, with a worse outcome in patients with SAE.

Infective endocarditis in patients with cancer: a consequence of invasive procedures or a harbinger of neoplasm?: A prospective, multicenter cohort

The aim of the study was to draw a comparison between the characteristics of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with cancer and those of IE in noncancer patients.Patients with IE, according to the modified Duke criteria, were prospectively included in the GAMES registry between January 2008 and February 2014 in 30 hospitals. Patients with active cancer were compared with noncancer patients.During the study period, 161 episodes of IE fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We studied 2 populations: patients whose cancer was diagnosed before IE (73.9%) and those whose cancer and IE were diagnosed simultaneously (26.1%). The latter more frequently had community-acquired IE (67.5% vs 26.4%, P < .01), severe sepsis (28.6% vs 11.1%, P = .013), and IE caused by gastrointestinal streptococci (42.9% vs 16.8%, P < .01). However, catheter source (7.1% vs 29.4%, P = .003), invasive procedures (26.2% vs 44.5%, P = .044), and immunosuppressants (9.5% vs 35.6%, P = .002) were less frequent.When compared with noncancer patients, patients with cancer were more often male (75.2% vs 67.7%, P = .049), with a higher comorbidity index (7 vs 4). In addition, IE was more often nosocomial (48.7% vs 29%) and originated in catheters (23.6% vs 6.2%) (all P < .01). Prosthetic endocarditis (21.7% vs 30.3%, P = .022) and surgery when indicated (24.2% vs 46.5%, P < .01) were less common. In-hospital mortality (34.8% vs 25.8%, P = .012) and 1-year mortality (47.8% vs 30.9%, P < .01) were higher in cancer patients, although 30-day mortality was not (24.8% vs 19.3%, P = .087).A significant proportion of cases of IE (5.6%) were recorded in cancer patients, mainly as a consequence of medical interventions. IE may be a harbinger of occult cancer, particularly that of gastrointestinal or urinary origin.

Assesment of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis after twenty-years. An analysis of 241 cases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the absence of classical features (fever, cardiac murmur, and peripheral vascular stigmata) the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) may be difficult. Current clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IE recommend the use of modified Duke criteria. Correct and prompt diagnosis of IE is crucial for the treatment and outcome of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence and the individual value of each criterion of the modified Duke criteria in our patients with infective endocarditis.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study between January 2008 - June 2014, in which we enrolled consecutive adult patients admitted for suspicion of IE to the Hospital of Infectious Diseases and at the Heart Institute . We used and extensive database in order to collect demographic data, laboratory and echocardiography results, evolution and outcome of the patients. Using the modified Duke criteria we identified 3 categories of IE: definite, possible and rejected. In order to evaluate the importance of each criterion in the diagnosis of IE we tested two hypotheses. First, we excluded each criterion from the final diagnosis and we counted how many cases felt into a lower category. Second, after adding each major and minor criterion, we tested how many cases would have been classifiable as definite IE.

RESULTS

The study included 241 adult patients with a mean age 58.16 years and sex ratio male/female 1.94. According to the modified Duke criteria 137 patients had definite IE, 79 patients had possible IE and 25 cases had rejected IE We had blood cultures positive IE in 109 cases and blood culture negative IE (BCNE) in 132 (71.21%) cases. Antibiotic treatment prior to blood culture was recorded in 152 (63.07%) patients. In the absence of the echocardiography major criterion, 43% of cases would become possible. After extraction of major microbiological criterion, only one third of definite cases would become possible. Minor criteria such as fever and predisposition contributed to the diagnosis only in 10% of cases. In the presence of vascular or immunological phenomena, or in the presence of minor microbiological criterion, half of the possible IE cases could become possible.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-years after their launch, the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of IE continue to be important tools. Low index of suspicion of IE and inappropriate use of antibiotics may have a great negative impact on the diagnosis of IE. Nowadays, the scarcity of classical Osler manifestations - bacteremia, fever and peripheral stigmata - makes the diagnosis of IE a challenge.

Euthermic endocarditis

Background

Most patients with infective endocarditis (IE) manifest fever. Comparison of endocarditis patients with and without fever, and whether the lack of fever in IE is a marker for poorer outcomes, such as demonstrated in other severe infectious diseases, have not been defined.

Methods and Results

Cases from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, Division of Infectious Diseases IE registry, a single-center database that contains all cases of IE treated at our center. Diagnosis date between 1970 and 2006, which met the modified Duke criteria for definite endocarditis, without fever was included. There were 240 euthermic endocarditis cases included in this analysis, with 282 febrile controls selected by frequency matching on gender and decade of diagnosis. Euthermic patients had a median age of 63.6 years (±16.1) as compared to 59.0 years (±16.4) in the febrile control group (p=0.001). Median (IQR) symptom duration prior to diagnosis was 4.0 (1.0, 12.0) weeks in the euthermic group compared to 3.0 (1.0, 8.0) weeks in the febrile controls (p= 0.006). From unadjusted analyses, survival rates were 87% in euthermic cases versus 83% in febrile controls across 28-day follow-up (p=0.164), and 72% in euthermic group cases versus 69% in febrile controls across 1-year follow-up (p=0.345). Also unadjusted, the 1-year cumulative incidence rate of valve surgery was higher in euthermic cases versus febrile controls (50% vs. 39%, p= 0.004).

Conclusions

Patients with euthermic endocarditis are older, and lack of fever was associated with longer symptom duration and delayed diagnosis prior to IE diagnosis. Despite a higher unadjusted rate of valve surgery in euthermic patients, the result was not significant when adjusting for baseline confounders. Differences in survival rates at both 28-days and 365-days were not statistically significant between the two groups.

Role of valsartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination in blood pressure control: an update

The treatment of moderate or severe hypertension in most cases requires the contemporaneous use of multiple antihypertensive agents. The most available two-drug combinations have an agent that addresses renin secretion and another one that is statistically more effective in renin-independent hypertension. The practice of combining agents that counteract different mechanisms is the most likely explanation for the fact that most available two-drug combinations have an agent that addresses renin secretion (beta-blocker, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker or direct renin inhibitor) and another one that is more effective in renin-independent hypertension (diuretic, dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker). Based on these considerations, addition of hydrochlorothiazide to the combination of an antagonist of the renin-angiotensin system with a calcium channel blocker would constitute a logical approach. Inclusion of a diuretic in the triple combination is based on the evidence that these agents are effective and cheap, enhance the effect of other antihypertensive agents, and add a specific effect to individuals with salt-sensitivity of blood pressure. The benefit of triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide over its dual component therapies has been demonstrated, and the use of a single pill will simplify therapy resulting in better blood pressure control.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: changing spectrum of a serious bacterial pathogen in patients with cancer

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia colonization/infection in patients with cancer has significantly increased over the past 2 decades. Patients with prolonged neutropenia, exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics, and those requiring mechanical ventilation have higher risk of infection. These micro-organisms are intrinsically resistant to carbapenems, and exposure to these agents has been linked to selection of S. maltophilia. Recently, these infections are being documented in patients without traditional risk factors. The spectrum of infection includes bacteremia, catheter-related infection, pneumonia, complicated biliary and urinary tract infection, and skin and skin-structure infection. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the therapeutic agent of choice, but resistance is increasingly being reported. Susceptibility to alternative agents is unpredictable. Combination therapy and alternative routes of drug administration, such as aerosolized aminoglycoside, might be necessary. New insights into the mechanisms of drug resistance might lead to identification of new target sites. Agents that improve outer-membrane permeability and broad-spectrum beta-lactamase inhibitors may favorably impact difficult-to-treat (i.e., multidrug resistant) S. maltophilia infections.

Impact of Prior Antiplatelet Therapy on Risk of Embolism in Infective Endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Embolism is a dreaded complication of infective endocarditis (IE). Currently, antimicrobial therapy is the only medical intervention proven to decrease the risk of embolism associated with IE. We hypothesized that, because platelet aggregation is operative in the pathogenesis of vegetation formation, embolism associated with IE should occur less frequently among patients who have received prior, continuous daily antiplatelet therapy for noninfectious reasons.

METHODS

We studied a retrospective cohort of adult patients with a diagnosis of IE who presented to the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) during 1980-1998. The cohort was divided into 2 groups on the basis of whether they had received continuous daily antiplatelet therapy for at least 6 months prior to the time of hospitalization for IE. Antiplatelet therapy included aspirin, dipyridamole, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, or any of combination of these agents. The primary end point was a symptomatic embolic event that occurred prior to or during hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the impact of continuous daily antiplatelet therapy on risk of symptomatic emboli associated with IE.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven (24.5%) of 600 patients experienced a symptomatic embolic event; the most common embolic manifestation was stroke (in 48.2% of patients). Embolic events occurred significantly less often among those who had received prior, continuous daily antiplatelet therapy (12.0% of patients who had received therapy vs. 27.8% patients who had not receive therapy; P<.001). After adjustment for several covariates known to influence both risk of embolism and propensity for antiplatelet use, the adjusted odds ratio for a symptomatic embolic event was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.68; P=.002) for patients receiving continuous daily antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of symptomatic emboli associated with IE was reduced in patients who received continuous daily antiplatelet therapy before onset of IE.