Compass elbow hinge: short-term results in five adolescents

Treatment of Severe Postburn Contracture of the Elbow via Distraction With External Circular Frame in Pediatric Patient

BACKGROUND

Although external circular frame (ECF) has been widely used for the correction of knee and ankle deformities, few studies reported the use of ECF for the treatment of severe postburn elbow contracture and stiffness (SPECS). The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the distraction using ECF in treating SPECS.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we implemented a retrospective single-center case series study composed of consecutive patients treated for SPECS at Chinese PLA General Hospital between January 2010 and January 2018. After scar release and skin grafting, distraction with ECF was performed for 4 to 6 weeks, and the frame was retained for 2 more weeks before removal. Four weeks of splinting and at least 1 year of rehabilitation were recommended. Patient demographics, active and passive range of motion (ROM) of the elbow at different time points (preoperative, postdistraction, and final follow-up), and complications were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the long-term improvement of the ROM. Other outcomes included complications and recurrence.

RESULTS

The ECF was used to treat SPECS in 6 patients (3 males and 3 females, average age of 11.7 ± 2.6 years). Scar release and distraction with ECF significantly increased both active (from 3° preoperative to 38.7° postdistraction) and passive (from 3.5° preoperative to 48.3° postdistraction) ROM over an average distraction duration of 5.2 weeks. The long-term improvement of active and passive ROM was 38° ± 13.4° and 46° ± 14.7°, respectively, over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Pin-tract infection occurred in 2 patients and were treated with local wound care and oral antibiotics. A tendon readhesion developed in 1 of the 6 patients because of noncompliance with splinting and physiotherapy, and was treated with revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3C strategy (i.e., contracture release, coverage of the defect with skin grafting, and correction of articular angle with gradual distraction using the ECF) is able to increase the ROM with minor complications. We recommend distraction with ECF as part of the treatment arsenal, particularly for severe contractures in which 1-stage correction is unfeasible because of considerable soft tissue shortening.

Arthrolysis and delayed internal fixation combined with hinged external fixation for elbow stiffness associated with malunion or nonunion of capitellum fracture

BACKGROUND

This study assessed outcomes after treatment of patients with capitellum fracture diagnosed >4 weeks after the trauma (delayed) who presented with stiff elbow.

METHODS

We reviewed 7 patients with stiff elbows after delayed diagnosis of capitellum fractures between February 2007 and February 2012. They were treated with arthrolysis by twin incisions, late open reduction and internal fixation, and a hinged external fixator. According to the Bryan-Morrey-McKee classification, 3 patients had type I capitellum fractures and 4 patients had type IV.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 28 months (range, 24-38 months). The mean delay from the initial trauma was 3.7 months. The flexion arc improved from a preoperative mean of 24° to a postoperative mean of 122°. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score increased from a mean of 56 points to 93 points. Anatomic fracture union occurred in all cases, and there was no secondary displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthrolysis, late internal fixation, and use of a hinged external fixator can solve problems associated with stiff elbow after delayed diagnosis of capitellum fracture. Combined use of these techniques may be a safe and effective treatment option.

Open release and a hinged external fixator for the treatment of elbow stiffness in young patients

Elbow stiffness is a well-recognized complication following elbow trauma, but little information is available regarding the surgical treatment of elbow stiffness in children and adolescents. This article presents the results of open arthrolysis with twin incisions and a hinged external fixator to treat severe elbow contracture in children and adolescents. Twenty-one patients (mean age, 14.9 years; range, 7-19 years) were evaluated. All patients underwent surgery using a hinged external fixator and a combined mediolateral approach to address the elbow contracture. Mayo elbow score and range of motion (ROM) were measured preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. All but 1 patient achieved a functional ROM of 100°. Preoperatively, mean flexion was 70.2° (range, 30°-100°), extension was 42.6° (range, 0°-80°), and total ROM was 28.5° (range, 0° to 80°); postoperatively, mean flexion improved to 122.8° (range, 90°-140°), extension to 10° (range, 0°-30°), and total ROM to 114.5° (range, 60°-140°). The Mayo elbow score improved from a mean of 48 points (range, 35-65 points) to 90 points (range, 75-100 points), and 9 patients had excellent results, 7 had good results, 4 had fair results, and 1 had a poor result. No significant differences existed between postoperative measurements at 3, 12, and 24 months. No pin-tract infections or deep infections occurred, and no vascular or neurological complications were noted. Surgical treatment of elbow stiffness using a hinged external fixator and open arthrolysis is an effective procedure in children and adolescents.

Correction of elbow flexion contracture in late obstetric brachial plexus palsy through arthrodiatasis of the elbow (Ioannina method)

Inadequate elbow extension is a recognized sequela after obstetric brachial plexus injury because of muscle imbalance and adversely affects the ability to perform sufficiently most daily living activities. The various methods that have been used to correct this deformity do not offer a satisfactory outcome in the long term and show a tendency for gradual recurrence. We present a new technique of a closed gradual arthrodiatasis using a unilateral hinged elbow external fixator. The technique was applied in 10 patients with elbow flexion contracture as a sequela of brachial plexus birth palsy. Loss of elbow extension measured 55 degrees at average. With a mean device application of 8.8 weeks all patients gained full elbow extension. No major complications were noted. All patients were satisfied with the outcome. This novel technique (closed gradual arthrodiatasis of the elbow joint) has a definite role in the treatment of elbow flexion contracture in late cases of obstetric palsy, given the otherwise limited surgical options.

Der Bewegungsfixateur zur frühfunktionellen Behandlung komplexer osteoligamentärer Verletzungen des Ellenbogengelenks

BACKGROUND

The treatment of complex injuries of the elbow joint by a hinged fixator is a new concept of external transfixation with guided movement in a defined monocentric axis. Biomechanical investigations using cadaver specimens showed that the monocentric guidance ensures additional stability in these unstable osteoligamentous injuries, allows early functional treatment, and can be used in primary but also in revision surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1997 and 2004, 23 patients with complex fractures of the elbow joint were treated with a hinged monocentric external fixator after open reduction and internal fixation. The early functional treatment started 6.4 days (mean) postoperatively; the average range of motion (ROM) was 58 degrees.

RESULTS

The early functional treatment using a hinged fixator resulted in a mean increase in the range of motion of up to 71 degrees within an average time course of 34.7 days. In 18 patients a significant increase in the ROM was seen; in 4 patients no improvement in the ROM could be achieved. Only one patient showed a decrease in ROM (5 degrees). Follow-up examinations after 10 months revealed a mean ROM of 88 degrees.

CONCLUSION

In agreement with the literature, our results provide evidence that the use of a hinged monocentric external fixator in combination with early functional therapy results in an increase in the ROM and represents a beneficial device and concept in the treatment of complex injuries of the elbow joint.

Mechanical distraction for the treatment of posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow in children and adolescents. Surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Elbow contracture is a recognized sequela of elbow injuries in children and adolescents, but previous studies of operative treatment with formal capsular release have demonstrated unpredictable outcomes and unfavorable results.

METHODS

Over a period of five years, fourteen children and adolescents with a mean age of fourteen years who had posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow were managed according to a prospective protocol. Eleven patients had undergone a mean of three previous operative procedures before the index operation. After intraoperative distraction with an external fixator, there was a relaxation phase for six days followed by mobilization of the elbow joint under distraction in the fixator for a mean of seven weeks. Intraoperative range of motion under distraction reached a mean of 100 degrees . Open arthrolysis was not performed, but in four children impinging heterotopic bone was removed through a limited approach. Decompression of the ulnar nerve was performed in seven patients.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative arc of total elbow motion was 37 degrees . The mean pronation was 46 degrees , and the mean supination was 56 degrees . After a mean duration of follow-up of thirty-four months, all patients but two had achieved an arc of motion of 100 degrees . The mean arc of flexion-extension was 108 degrees (range, 75 degrees to 130 degrees ). The mean range of pronation was 73 degrees (range, 20 degrees to 90 degrees ), and the mean range of supination was 75 degrees (range, 10 degrees to 90 degrees ). There were no pin-track infections or deep infections, and all elbows were stable. At the time of follow-up, three patients had radiographic evidence of humeroulnar degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed distraction of the elbow joint with use of a monolateral external fixation frame with motion capacity yields more favorable results than other previously reported options for the treatment of posttraumatic elbow contractures in children and adolescents.

Static progressive splinting for posttraumatic elbow stiffness

OBJECTIVES

To determine the value of static progressive splinting in helping patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness regain functional motion and avoid operative treatment for stiffness.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Level I Trauma Center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

Over a 3-year period, 29 consecutive patients with elbow stiffness after trauma (flexion contracture greater than 30 degrees or flexion less than 130 degrees) were treated with static progressive elbow splinting when a standard exercise program was no longer achieving gains in motion. Three patients were treated after the injury alone; 14 were treated after operative treatment of the initial injury, and 12 after a secondary operative contracture release for posttraumatic stiffness. Splinting was initiated on an average of 55 days (range, 15 to 200 d) after injury or operative treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Ulnohumeral range of motion before and after splint treatment.

RESULTS

The flexion arc improved from 71 degrees (range, 0 to 100 degrees) before splinting to 112 degrees (range, 20 to 150 degrees) after splinting. After splinting, 3 patients had a flexion contracture greater than 30 degrees and 10 patients (34%) had fewer than 130 degrees of flexion. Only 3 patients-2 with heterotopic bone and 1 with an associated ulnar neuropathy-requested an operation to address elbow stiffness. Patients who were splinted after the initial injury (n=17, average improvement (fl-ext)=51+/-37 degrees) regained greater motion during splint wear than patients treated after elbow capsulectomy (n=12, average improvement (fl-ext)=22+/-24 degrees).

CONCLUSIONS

Static progressive splinting can help gain additional motion when standard exercises seem stagnant or inadequate, particularly after the original injury. Operative treatment of stiffness was avoided in most patients.

Mechanical distraction for the treatment of posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Elbow contracture is a recognized sequela of elbow injuries in children and adolescents, but previous studies of operative treatment with formal capsular release have demonstrated unpredictable outcomes and unfavorable results.

METHODS

Over a period of five years, fourteen children and adolescents with a mean age of fourteen years who had posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow were managed according to a prospective protocol. Eleven patients had undergone a mean of three previous operative procedures before the index operation. After intraoperative distraction with an external fixator, there was a relaxation phase for six days followed by mobilization of the elbow joint under distraction in the fixator for a mean of seven weeks. Intraoperative range of motion under distraction reached a mean of 100 degrees. Open arthrolysis was not performed, but in four children impinging heterotopic bone was removed through a limited approach. Decompression of the ulnar nerve was performed in seven patients.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative arc of total elbow motion was 37 degrees. The mean pronation was 46 degrees, and the mean supination was 56 degrees. After a mean duration of follow-up of thirty-four months, all patients but two had achieved a functional arc of motion of 100 degrees. The mean arc of flexion-extension was 108 degrees (range, 75 degrees to 130 degrees). The mean range of pronation was 73 degrees (range, 20 degrees to 90 degrees), and the mean range of supination was 75 degrees (range, 10 degrees to 90 degrees). There were no pin-track infections or deep infections, and all elbows were stable. At the time of follow-up, three patients had radiographic evidence of humeroulnar degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed distraction of the elbow joint with use of a monolateral external fixation frame with motion capacity yields more favorable results than other previously reported options for the treatment of posttraumatic elbow contractures in children and adolescents.