Pediatric monteggia fractures: a multicenter examination of treatment strategy and early clinical and radiographic results

Surface electromyography character of upper limb muscle after open reduction combine with ulnar osteotomy in children with neglected Monteggia fracture

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the surface electromyography (sEMG) characteristics of upper limb muscles in children with neglected Monteggia fracture after open reduction of radial head dislocation and ulna osteotomy and bone grafting internal fixation, and to understand the recovery of muscle activity in children after operation, provide reference for clinical rehabilitation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on sixteen children with neglected Monteggia fracture who underwent ulna osteotomy at our hospital from January 2021 to August 2022. The biceps brachii, triceps brachii, flexor carpi radialis, and extensor carpi ulnaris muscle activities were recorded during grip strength tests, flexion and extension of elbow joint while holding a 1 kg dumbbell, as well as gripping tasks. The root mean square (RMS) values of sEMG signals, co-contraction ratio, and elbow joint function scores were compared between pre- and post-operation periods as well as between the affected side and unaffected side.

RESULTS

The preoperative maximum grip strength, as well as the average RMS values of flexor carpi radialis and average RMS value of extensor carpi ulnaris on the affected side were significantly lower. After surgery, both the maximum RMS value of biceps brachii and maximum and average RMS value of extensor carpi ulnaris on the affected side remained lower. Prior to surgery, when performing elbow flexion and extension tests while holding a 1 kg dumbbell, both mean RMS values of biceps brachii and flexor carpi radialis on the affected side were smaller. However, after surgery, there was an increase in mean RMS values of biceps brachii on the affected side. Furthermore, postoperative elbow function scores were significantly higher than preoperative scores.

CONCLUSION

Open reduction of radial head dislocation combined with ulna osteotomy and bone grafting can achieve good functional activities in the treatment of neglected Monteggia fractures in children. The EMG activity of the extensor carnosus ulnalis muscle on the affected side related to grip strength was low, and the desired effect was not achieved within the expected time.

Bado type III Monteggia fractures have a high injury- and treatment-related complication rate: a single center study of 73 fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 Monteggia fractures can be problematic injuries. The aim of this population-based study is to evaluate the risk of complications according to the Bado types, clinical outcome, and incidence.

METHODS

 72 children (median age 6, range 2-11 years) with 73 Monteggia fractures treated during 2014-2022 were identified from the institutional fracture register. Timing of diagnosis, complications, and method of treatment were registered. Outcomes were assessed at mean 4 years (1-9) follow-up in 68 (94%) children. The census population (< 16 years old) in Helsinki metropolitan area during the study period was assessed.

RESULTS

Bado types I (n = 43) and III (n = 27) comprised all but 3 of the fractures. Diagnosis was made on admission in 57, and with a 1-8-day delay in 16 children. 8 children had sustained an associated nerve injury. 35 children were treated operatively, 7 after failed closed treatment. 4 reoperations were performed, including 3 ulnar osteotomies. The risk of complications (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-14) and closed treatment failures (OR 12.3, CI 1.3-118) was higher in Bado type III than in type I injuries. 60 children attended for clinical follow-up, all had congruent radio-humeral joints and full range of elbow and forearm motion. Mean PedsQL was 94 (72-100) and QuickDash 3 (0-13). 8 additional children reported normal elbow functions by phone. The calculated mean annual incidence of Monteggia injuries was 2.9/100,000 children.

CONCLUSION

 Monteggia fractures are rare (2.9/100,000 yearly). Bado type III injuries are associated with a high risk of complications.

Bado III Monteggia in children - treatment options and outcome: an ultrasound control study

The Bado III Monteggia lesion is an uncommon fracture in children. Radial head dislocation can occur due to intra- or extra-articular fractures of the olecranon. In extra-articular ulnar fractures, heterogeneous operative methods are proposed in different case reports. The objective of this study is to determine if closed reduction of the ulnar fracture, either without osteosynthesis or by using TEN, is a safe treatment option. In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed 26 children who were treated for an extra-articular proximal metaphyseal ulnar fracture with dislocation of the radial head. These patients underwent a follow-up examination after an average of four years. The investigation included a physical examination, visualization of the elbow anatomy, and specifically, the radial head retention in the joint by ultrasound. Of the 26 patients, 18 were treated by closed reduction and intramedullary osteosynthesis (TEN), 7 were treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization without osteosynthesis, and 1 child was treated by open reduction of the ulna and plate osteosynthesis. In the follow-up examination, 25 children showed an excellent outcome, as well as inapparent sonography. Although this is a retrospective study with different types of treatment, closed reduction of the ulna with or without osteosynthesis appears to be effective. We believe that the correct primary reduction is the key to an excellent long-term outcome. Regarding the invasiveness of the treatment, reduction without or with TEN osteosynthesis should be the preferred approach in extra-articular pediatric Bado III fractures.

Management of Pediatric Elbow Fractures and Dislocations

Pediatric elbow fractures and dislocations have always been a challenge from a diagnostic and therapeutic point of view, primarily due to the complex nature of the pediatric elbow, especially its developmental anatomy. They must be diagnosed and treated on time to prevent numerous complications with long-term consequences. With the development of radiology and pediatric surgery and orthopedics, as well as the development of modern osteosynthesis materials, concerning current scientific and professional knowledge, the outcomes are getting better, with fewer acute and chronic complications. This comprehensive review aims to provide clinicians current knowledge about pediatric elbow fractures and dislocations so that in daily practice they have as few doubts as possible with the best possible treatment outcomes.

[Monteggia lesions and equivalent lesions in children]

BACKGROUND

Missed Monteggia lesions results in chronic luxation and deficits in the range of motion. The overall therapeutic goal is a quick and stable anatomical repositioning of the lesion. The prognosis of Monteggia lesions in comparison to its equivalents is better, especially with early diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of the types of lesion, treatment modalities, hospitalization, immobilization, movement deficits, perioperative complications and outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 62 patients treated with acute Monteggia lesions and its equivalents during the period of 2009-2020.

RESULTS

2 patients were treated with cast immobilization only, 11 with repositioning under general anesthesia, 39 with intramedullary nailing and 10 with screw osteosynthesis. The average observation period was 4.1 months. Patients with cast immobilization needed only a short hospitalization (2 days), patients with repositioning or osteosynthesis had longer hospitalization (3.4 or 4.3 days, respectively). Deficits of the range of motion did not appear in simple cast immobilization or intramedullary nailing without reduction; however, patients with closed reduction or screw osteosynthesis showed some degree of deficits (9% and 40%, respectively). Monteggia lesions needed shorter hospitalization than their equivalents (3.7 vs. 4.5 days) and had less deficits in the range of motion (7% vs. 21%).

CONCLUSION

Most patients were treated with osteosynthesis (79%). Patients with Monteggia lesions had a better outcome than patients with equivalent lesions.

Exposed Intramedullary Fixation Produces Similar Outcomes to Buried Fixation for Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures

BACKGROUND

Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures requires ulnar length stability to maintain reduction of the radiocapitellar joint. When operative care is indicated, intramedullary ulna fixation can be buried or left temporarily exposed through the skin while under a cast. The authors hypothesized that treatment with exposed fixation yields equivalent results to buried fixation for Monteggia fractures while avoiding secondary surgery for hardware removal.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children with acute Monteggia fractures at our Level 1 pediatric trauma center was performed. Patient charts and radiographs were evaluated for age, fracture type, fracture location, Bado classification, type of treatment, complications, cast duration, time to fracture union, time to hardware removal, and range of motion.

RESULTS

Out of 59 acute Monteggia fractures surgically treated (average age 6 y, range 2 to 14), 15 (25%) patients were fixed with buried intramedullary fixation and 44 (75%) with exposed intramedullary fixation under a cast. There were no significant differences between buried and exposed intramedullary fixation in cast time after surgery (39 vs. 37 d; P =0.55), time to fracture union (37 vs. 35 d; P =0.67), pronation/supination (137 vs. 134 degrees; P =0.68) or flexion/extension (115 vs. 114 degrees; P =0.81) range of motion. The exposed fixation had a return to OR of 4.5% (2 out of 44), and the buried fixation returned to the OR for removal on all patients.

CONCLUSION

Exposed intramedullary fixation yielded equivalent clinical outcomes to buried devices in the treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures while eliminating the need for a second surgery to remove hardware, reducing the associated risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia, but had a higher complication rate. Open Monteggia fractures or patterns with a known risk of delayed union may benefit from buried instead of exposed intramedullary fixation for earlier mobilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of the midterm result between locking plate and elastic intramedullary nail treating oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Acute Monteggia fracture (AMF) is defined as a fracture of the proximal ulna combined with a dislocation of the radial head, with less than 1 percent prevalence in pediatric patients with an elbow injury. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of two treatment methods for oblique ulnar fracture AMF Bado type I in children.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 28 children with oblique ulnar fracture acute Monteggia injury Bado I were included. Patients was divided into two groups: In the EIN group 16 patients were fixed with elastic intramedullary nail after reduction, and in the LCP group 12 patients were fixed with locking compression plate after reduction. Operation time and blood loss were recorded and the patients were assessed clinically by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of movement(ROM) and range of rotation(ROR).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were accessible for durable follow-up, with a mean age of 7.7 ± 1.3 years, follow up by 33.7 ± 5.1 months. The average operation time was 48.1 ± 9.2 min for the EIN group and 67.1 ± 7.2 min for the LCP group. The average blood loss was 8.2 ± 2.3 ml for the EIN group and 18.8 ± 3.8 ml for the LCP group. The average operation time and average blood loss in the EIN group are significant less than the LCP group. Mean MEPS, ROM, ROR in both group improved significantly before sugery to three months after surgery, and maintained very good results at last follow up. There is no significant difference between the EIN group and the LCP group in MEPS, ROM and ROR.

CONCLUSIONS

Oblique ulnar fracture Bado type I acute monteggia fracture in pediatric patients fixed by EIN and LCP can both get good mid-term results measured by MEPS, ROM and ROR, Fixed by EIN have shorter operation time and less blood loss than fixed by LCP.

Outcomes After Operative Treatment of Pediatric Monteggia Fracture-Dislocations: Comparison Between Open and Closed Injuries

BACKGROUND

Open pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations are a relatively uncommon injury pattern, with limited numbers reported in previous series. Open fracture-dislocations frequently represent more severe injury patterns with potential for contamination. We aim to determine differences in long-term clinical and functional outcomes in the operative management of closed versus open pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations.

METHODS

A retrospective review of operatively treated pediatric Monteggia fracture-dislocations was performed. Closed versus open injuries were compared in both clinical outcomes, as well as patient-reported outcomes through Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of 30 operatively treated injuries, 12/30 (40%) were open fracture-dislocations. Patients were followed clinically for an average of 15.65 months in open injuries and an average of 4.61 months in closed injuries. A trend toward increased time to union was observed, however, significance was not achieved; open injuries averaged 8.0 versus 5.8 weeks for closed injuries ( P =0.07). Two patients (11%) in the closed fracture group experienced postoperative complications; both were minor. Five patients (42%) in the open fracture-dislocation group experienced a total of 6 postoperative complications; 5 of the 6 complications were major. QuickDASH scores were obtained at an average of 5 years postoperatively; mean QuickDASH scores were higher in the open fracture group, 13.1, compared with the closed fracture group, 5.9 ( P =0.038). Increased QuickDASH scores were independently associated with presence of postoperative complications. QuickDASH score could be expected to increase by 12.5 points in those with major complications ( P =0.044).

CONCLUSION

We present the largest single cohort of pediatric open Monteggia fracture-dislocation injuries to date. These injuries are predictive of poorer outcomes including trend toward increased time to union, increased risk of major complication, and can independently predict worse long-term patient-reported functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-these data represent a retrospective comparative study of clinical and functional outcomes.

An anterolateral dislocated monteggia lesion with plastic lateral bowing of the ulna associated with ipsilateral epiphyseal fracture of the distal radius: a case report with 4 years of follow-up

We encountered a rare presentation of anterolateral dislocation of the radial head with plastic lateral bowing of the ulna associated with ipsilateral epiphyseal fracture of the distal radius in a child. The patient was treated surgically and reached skeletal maturity 4 years later with no functional or growth deficiency.

Closed reduction by trans-physealantegrade elastic stable intramedullary nailing in acute pediatric Monteggia fractures: a report of 22 cases

Treatment of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures is still debated. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of strategy based on closed reduction by trans-physeal antegrade elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) of the ulnar fracture. Retrospective analysis of 22 patients (13 boys and nine girls) treated for acute Monteggia fractures between May 2008 and August 2018 was performed. Mean age at injury was 6.6 years. Mean follow-up was 4.5 years. On the basis of the Bado classification, 15 lesions were of type I, three types III and four types IV. All the patients were managed with closed reduction and ESIN of the ulna fracture within 2-19 h of arrival. Intraoperative stability of reduction of the radial head was checked under fluoroscopic control in pronation and supination. Outcomes were assessed with the Bruce et al. scoring system. Closed alignment of the ulnar fracture by ESIN had simultaneously reduced and stabilized the radial head dislocation in all patients. At the final follow-up, all the patients had excellent results. Complete healing of the fracture occurred in 6 weeks and the elastic nail removed at 3-6 months postoperatively. There was no case of instability or subluxation or re-dislocation of the radial head. No olecranon epiphysiodesis or growth disorders were noticed. Early diagnosis and management of acute pediatric Monteggia fractures by closed reduction and ESIN achieve excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Simultaneous ipsilateral Monteggia fracture-dislocation and distal radius fracture: A report of a pediatric case and review of the literature

We present the case of a 12-year- old boy who suffered from a combination of Monteggia fracture-dislocation along with ipsilateral distal radius fracture. The patient underwent closed reduction of the Monteggia lesion and the distal radius followed by percutaneous pinning. The postoperative course was satisfactory. Associated Monteggia fracture-dislocation and ipsilateral distal forearm fracture are rare. Our case and the literature review highlight the presence of common clinical features in pediatric patients with these particular injuries, including male dominance, age around 9 years, fall from a height, and lateral displacement of the dislocated radial head.

The role of biceps loading and muscle activation on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries: An in vitro biomechanical study

INTRODUCTION

Little evidence-based information is available to direct the optimal rehabilitation of patients with anterior Monteggia injuries.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The aims of this biomechanical investigation were to (1) quantify the effect of biceps loading and (2) to compare the effect of simulated active and passive elbow flexion on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical study.

METHODS

Six cadaveric arms were mounted in an elbow motion simulator. The effect of biceps loading, simulated active and passive elbow flexion motions was examined with application of 0N, 20N, 40N, 60N, 80N, and 100N of load. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion motions were then performed with the forearm supinated. Radial head translation relative to the capitellum was measured using an optical tracking system. After testing the intact elbows, the proximal ulna was osteotomized and realigned using a custom jig to simulate an anatomical reduction. We then sequentially sectioned the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule, annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the proximal and middle interosseous membrane to simulate soft tissue injuries commonly associated with anterior Monteggia fractures.

RESULTS

Greater magnitudes of biceps loading significantly increased anterior radial head translation. However, there was no significant difference in radial head translation between simulated active and passive elbow flexion except in the final stage of soft tissue sectioning. There was a significant increase in anterior radial head translation with progressive injury states with both isometric biceps loading and simulated active and passive motion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that anatomic reduction of the ulna may not be sufficient to restore radial head alignment in anterior Monteggia injuries with a greater magnitude of soft tissue injury. In cases with significant soft tissue injury, the elbow should be immobilized in a flexed and supinated position to allow relaxation of the biceps and avoid movement of the elbow in the early postoperative period.

Management of acute length-unstable Monteggia fractures in children: A case report

BACKGROUND

Monteggia fractures are uncommon injuries in paediatric age. Treatment algorithms assert that length-unstable fractures are treated with plate fixation. In this case report, intramedullary fixation of an acute length-unstable Monteggia fracture allowed a stable reduction to be achieved, along with an appropriate ulnar length and alignment as well as radio capitellar reduction despite the fact that the orthopaedic surgeon did not use a plate for the ulnar fracture. The scope of treatment is to avoid the use of a plate that causes periosteal stripping and blood circulation disruption around the fracture.

CASE SUMMARY

A four-year-old girl presented at the Emergency Department following an accidental fall off a chair onto the right forearm. The X-ray highlighted a length-unstable acute Bado type 1 Monteggia fracture of the right forearm. On the same day, the patient underwent surgical treatment of the Monteggia fracture. The surgeon preferred not to use a plate to avoid a delay in fracture healing and to allow the micromotion necessary for callus formation. The operation comprised percutaneous fixation with an elastic intramedullary K-wire of the ulnar fracture and, subsequently, humeroradial joint reduction through manual manipulation. The orthopaedic surgeon assessed the stability of the radial head reduction under fluoroscopic control through flexion, extension, pronation and supination of the forearm. Healing of the fracture occurred within six weeks after surgery, as indicated by the presence of calluses on at least three cortices on standard radiographs. Dislocation/subluxation or loss of ulnar reduction was not apparent at the final X-ray examination.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary fixation of unstable Monteggia fractures results in excellent outcomes, provides reliable reduction and causes fewer complications.

Surgical Treatment With Titanium Elastic Nail (TEN) for Failed Conservative Treatment of Acute Monteggia Lesions in Children

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the results of intramedullary osteosynthesis with titanium elastic nail (TEN) in the surgical treatment of Monteggia lesions in children aged 12 and under.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery with the TEN method between 2013 and 2019 were screened retrospectively. The inclusion criteria were patients who failed conservative treatment, a history of acute trauma (<14 d after injury), age 12 years and under, patients who underwent intramedullary osteosynthesis with TEN when surgical treatment is required, a follow-up period of over 12 months, absence of congenital upper extremity and bone anomalies, and no history of trauma to the ipsilateral elbow. For functional classification, the Grace and Eversmann Criteria were used to evaluate union, pronation, and supination, while the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was used to assess overall elbow function and limitations.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (26 male/12 female) were included in the study. The median age was 8.0 (6 to 10) years old and follow-up period was 26.0 (16 to 39) months. The mean value of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 97.1, 32 cases were excellent and 6 cases had good results. While the average age was 9.4 years in patients with mobility limitations, it was 7.1 years in patients without mobility limitations. Statistically, less movement restriction was observed in patients of younger age.

CONCLUSION

Length unstable ulnar fracture pattern for Monteggia lesions and those with secondary loss of reduction, intramedullary stabilization of the ulna fracture with TEN helps to achieve good functional and radiologic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Irreducible Monteggia Fracture-Dislocation Secondary to an Entrapped Brachialis Tendon: A Case Report

CASE

A 7-year-old boy sustained a Monteggia fracture-dislocation. Corrective osteotomy of the ulna was performed to restore proper forearm anatomy and achieve radial head reduction. Recurrent radial head instability was noted postoperatively, and magnetic resonance imaging indicated recurrent dislocation of the radial head with, notably, an entrapped brachialis tendon and annular ligament. Open reduction of the elbow was performed. Anatomic reduction of the radiocapitellar joint and full range of motion without instability was achieved.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of persistent radial head instability because of an entrapped brachialis tendon.

Identifying Risk Factors for Elbow Injury in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department With Distal Forearm Fractures

BACKGROUND

Pediatric distal forearm fractures are one of the most common injuries seen in the emergency department. Orthopedic teaching instructs providers to radiograph the joint above and the joint below the fracture site for concurrent injury. Despite this teaching, there is little evidence to suggest that elbow injuries are common in children with distal forearm fractures. Similarly, there are few data that help the clinician predict which children are at higher risk for co-injury.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2011 National Emergency Department Sample data set. Children aged 2 to 17 years with an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, code for a distal forearm fracture were included in the study. The primary outcome of interest was an "elbow" injury, defined as an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, code for proximal radius, proximal ulna, or distal humeral fracture or dislocation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using patient demographics, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, and underlying medical conditions.

RESULTS

A total of 54,262 children with a distal forearm fracture were identified. Of these children, only 0.8% (n = 463) had an elbow injury. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus were the most common elbow injury seen (48.2% of elbow injuries seen). Children were more likely to have a co-injury if they were younger (9.8 years vs 8.3 years, P < 0.01), female (36% vs 44%, P < 0.01), injured via fall (68% vs 76%, P < 0.01), had a higher injury severity score (4.1 vs 4.5, P < 0.01), or were admitted for their injuries (1.5% vs 15.7%, P < 0.01). In the adjusted model, only age and disposition were predictors of co-injury. Isolated buckle fracture of the radius and metaphyseal fracture of the radius with dorsal angulation were protective against elbow injury (odds ratio = 0.39 and 0.60, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with distal forearm fractures very rarely have concurrent elbow injuries. These injuries are more likely in younger female children.

Intramedullary Ulnar Fixation for the Treatment of Monteggia Fracture

Background

Although many pediatric Monteggia fractures can be treated nonoperatively, the presence of any residual radiocapitellar subluxation following ulnar reduction mandates a more aggressive approach to restore and maintain ulnar length. In younger children, restoration and maintenance of ulna length may be achieved through intramedullary fixation of the ulnar shaft.

Description

A Steinmann pin or flexible intramedullary nail is introduced percutaneously through the olecranon apophysis and advanced within the medullary canal to the ulnar fracture site. If necessary, the ulnar length and alignment are then restored by either a closed reduction or open reduction. The pin or nail is advanced across the fracture site into the distal fracture fragment and then advanced to a point just proximal to the distal ulnar physis. Once restoration of normal radiocapitellar alignment is verified fluoroscopically, the pin is bent and cut outside of the skin and a cast or splint is applied.

Alternatives

Closed reduction and cast immobilization is a well-accepted form of treatment for a Monteggia fracture. If ulnar length and alignment along with an anatomic reduction of the radiocapitellar joint can be achieved in this fashion, surgery can be avoided, but close radiographic follow-up is recommended to assess for loss of alignment with subsequent radial-head subluxation. Open reduction and internal fixation with use of a plate-and-screw construct can achieve similar results to intramedullary fixation and should be considered for length-unstable fractures and those in which an appropriately sized intramedullary implant fails to maintain adequate ulnar alignment. If plastic deformation of the ulna is present with residual radiocapitellar subluxation following reduction of the ulnar diaphysis, consideration should be given to elongating the ulna through the fracture site with use of plate fixation in order to allow reduction of the radial head.

Rationale

Intramedullary fixation provides several benefits over open reduction and plate fixation for these injuries. In general, treatment can be rendered with a shorter anesthetic time, less scarring, and without the concern for symptomatic retained hardware associated with plating along the subcutaneous boarder of the ulna shaft.

Expected Outcomes

Compared with nonoperative treatment, intramedullary fixation of length-stable Monteggia fractures has lower rates of recurrent radial-head subluxation and loss of ulnar alignment requiring subsequent operative treatment¹. If healing is achieved without residual radiocapitellar instability, good elbow function can be expected.

Important Tips

The entry point for the intramedullary implant should be slightly radial to the tip of the olecranon apophysis to compensate for the anatomic varus bow of the proximal aspect of the ulna.Intramedullary fixation is ideal for length-stable ulnar fractures. If a comminuted or long oblique fracture is present, an intramedullary device may not maintain ulnar length, leading to residual or recurrent radiocapitellar instability. For length-unstable fractures, therefore, a plate-and-screw construct should be considered.No more than 3 attempts should be made to pass the intramedullary implant into the distal ulnar segment by closed means in order to limit the risk of iatrogenic compartment syndrome.If anatomic alignment of the radiocapitellar joint is not achieved following an apparent anatomic reduction of the ulna, assess for plastic deformation of the ulna and consider open elongation of the ulna through the fracture site with use of plate fixation.Following fixation and radial-head reduction, immobilize the forearm in the position of maximal radiocapitellar stability (typically in supination).

Surgical Reconstruction of Missed Monteggia Lesions in Children

BACKGROUND

Chronic Monteggia lesions in children may cause pain, deformity, decreased range of motion, and neurological symptoms. Numerous surgical techniques have been advocated to reconstruct long-standing Monteggia injures in efforts to maximize long-term upper limb function. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the clinical and radiographic results of a modified surgical technique for missed Monteggia fracture-dislocations.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of 52 patients who underwent surgical reconstruction of missed Monteggia fracture-dislocations at a tertiary pediatric hospital was performed. The median patient age at the time of surgery was 6.8 years, and the median time from injury to surgery was 12.9 weeks. Electronic medical records, including clinic notes, radiographic images, and operative reports, were reviewed for study analysis. Median clinical and radiographic follow-up was 19.1 months.

RESULTS

The median elbow range of motion improved from 108 degrees of flexion and 5 degrees short of full extension preoperatively to 140 degrees of flexion (P<0.001) and full extension (P=0.10) postoperatively. Forearm range of motion also improved from a median of 80 degrees of pronation and 58 degrees of supination preoperatively to 80 degrees of pronation (P=0.54) and 80 degrees of supination (P<0.001) postoperatively. Congruent radiocapitellar alignment was maintained in 39 patients (75%). Nine patients (17%) had redislocation of the radiocapitellar joint, and 4 patients (8%) had radiographic resubluxation. Six of the 9 patients who experienced redislocation underwent early revision and achieved uncomplicated longer term results. Patients who received repair of the native annular ligament were more likely to achieve lasting radiocapitellar joint stability (P=0.03) when compared with patients who received annular ligament reconstruction or if the annular ligament was not addressed.

CONCLUSION

Meaningful improvements in elbow motion and radiocapitellar stability can be safely achieved in the majority of children following surgical reconstruction of missed Monteggia lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective case series.

Management of Monteggia Injuries in the Pediatric Patient

Monteggia fracture-dislocations in the pediatric population have unique patterns of injury that require distinct considerations in diagnosis and management. When appropriately diagnosed and treated early, acute pediatric Monteggia injuries have favorable outcomes. Missed or inadequately treated injuries result in chronic Monteggia lesions that require more complex surgical reconstructions and are associated with less predictable outcomes. This article reviews the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of acute and chronic pediatric Monteggia injuries as well as the controversies there in.

Functional and radiological outcome in patients with acute Monteggia fracture treated surgically: a comparison between closed reduction and external fixation versus closed reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nailing

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in children with acute Monteggia fracture treated by two different surgical techniques. Twenty-six children treated by either closed reduction and external fixation (group A) or elastic stable intramedullary nails (group B) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Quick DASH questionnaire. Overall, both surgical techniques provided similar excellent healing rates and good clinical outcomes (P > 0.05), as well as radiological outcomes (P > 0.05). Radiographically, no secondary displacement, wire migration, consolidation delays, non-union, malunion or re-fractures were noted. However, two patients (7.6%), one in group A (1/15; 6.7%) and one in group B (1/11; 9.1%), developed heterotopic ossification at the level of the ulna. Clinical functional outcomes were similar between the two groups of patients. The mean overall Quick DASH score was 0.79 (range, 0-18.2). However, six in group A (40%) and one in group B (9.1%) complained of the clinical appearance and had intermittent residual pain on the injured side. In conclusion, both elastic stable intramedullary nailing and external fixation can achieve satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes in children with acute Monteggia fractures. However, the rate of residual pain and less satisfactory clinical appearance was higher in patients managed by external fixation compared to those treated by elastic stable intramedullary nailing. According to our results, elastic stable intramedullary nailing should be used as primary treatment option in children with acute Monteggia fracture requiring surgical management.

Compartment Syndrome in Operatively Managed Pediatric Monteggia Fractures and Equivalents

BACKGROUND

Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is not commonly associated with pediatric Monteggia fractures or Monteggia equivalents (MF/ME). The aims of this study were: (1) To document a rate of ACS among children with operatively managed MF/ME, comparing this to the rate of ACS in classically associated Type 3 supracondylar humerus (T3-SCH) fractures at the same institution; (2) To determine which patients with MF/ME are at highest risk for ACS.

METHODS

Children ages 2 to 12 with MF/ME requiring operative management at an academic institution over a 14-year period were identified. The Monteggia fractures were characterized using the Bado classification; equivalent injuries were identified according to established criteria. Similarly, all patients with T3-SCH fractures managed over the same period were identified. Record review included demographic, procedural, and radiographic variables. Statistical analysis compared the rates of ACS in both groups and determined risk factors associated with developing ACS in patients with MF/ME.

RESULTS

The rate of ACS in MF/ME was 9 of the 59 (15.3%), which was significantly higher than the rate of ACS in T3-SCH fractures 2 of the 230 (0.9%) (P=0.001). Comparing MF/ME with ACS to those without; there was no difference in sex (P=1.00), Bado Type (P=0.683), or Monteggia fracture versus equivalent (P=0.704). MF/ME with preoperative vascular deficits (22.2%) and those undergoing intramedullary fixation of the radius were more likely to develop ACS (P=0.021 and 0.015, respectively), and there was a trend toward higher rates of ACS among MF/ME with preoperative neurological deficits (P=0.064).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with operatively managed MF/ME had a significantly higher rate of ACS compared with patients with T3-SCH fractures. With no predisposition based on Bado classification or Monteggia fracture versus equivalent, all operatively managed MF/ME appear to be at risk for ACS. Patients with preoperative neurovascular deficits and those undergoing intramedullary radial fixation develop ACS at higher rates. Careful assessment of the forearm for signs and symptoms of ACS both before and after fixation is critical.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective case control.

Clinical effect of manual reduction of humeroradial joint in the treatment of type Ⅰ-Ⅲ fresh Monteggia fracture in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of closed reduction on the humeroradial joint in the treatment of Bado type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ fresh Monteggia fractures in children and investigate the effect of clinical factors, including Bado classification, age and time of treatment on the success rate of closed reduction.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the data of children ≤10 years old with fresh Monteggia fractures (injury within two weeks) treated by manual reduction with plaster immobilization from January 2014 to April 2019. All patients were followed up in the outpatient department every two weeks for 4-6 weeks until plaster removal and then 3, 6 and 12 months. Online or telephone interview was provided for some inconvenient patients after 6 months. Mackay criteria were used to evaluate the clinical effect. Radiographic data were collected and reviewed to assess the reduction of the humeroradial joint. Function of the elbow joint and forearm was evaluated and risk factors related to the failure of reduction were assessed. The successful manual reduction was analyzed from three aspects, respectively Bado fracture type (Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ), patient age (<3 year, 3-6 years, >6 years) and time interval from injury to treatment (group A, <1 day; group B, 1-3 days; group C, >3 days).

RESULTS

Altogether 88 patients were employed in this study, including 58 males (65.9%) and 30 females (34.1%) aged from 1 to 10 years. There were 29 cases (33.0%) of Bado type Ⅰ Monteggia fractures, 16 (18.2%) type Ⅱ and 43 (48.7%) type Ⅲ. Successful manual reduction was achieved in 79 children (89.8%) at the last follow-up. The failed 9 patients received open surgery. Mackay criteria showed 100% good-excellent rate for all the patients. The success rate of manual reduction was 89.7%, 87.5% and 90.7% in Bado type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ cases, respectively, revealing no significant differences among different Bado types (χ² = 0.131, p = 0.937). Successful closed reduction was achieved in 13 toddlers (13/13, 100%), 38 preschool children (28/42, 90.5%) and 28 school-age children (28/33, 84.8%), suggesting no significant difference either (χ² = 2.375, p = 0.305). However time interval from injury to treatment showed that patients treated within 3 days had a much higher rate of successful manual reduction: 67 cases (67/71, 94.4%) in group A, 10 cases (10/11, 90.9%) in group B, and 2 cases (2/6, 33.3%) in group C (χ² = 22.464, p < 0.001). Fisher's test further showed significant differences between groups A and C (p = 0.001) and groups B and C (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Closed reduction is a safe and effective method for treating fresh Monteggia fractures in children. The reduction should be conducted as soon as possible once the diagnosis has been made.

Antegrade Elastic Intramedullary Nailing Insertion Technique Results in Higher Incidence of Symptomatic Implants in Pediatric Ulnar Fractures

Retrograde and antegrade nailing techniques are the two options available to a surgeon when using elastic stable intramedullary nailing; however, the literature comparing these two nailing techniques is scarce. Thus, we conducted a retrospective review of all pediatric and adolescent ulnar fractures treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing at our facility. We hypothesize that the clinical outcomes (implant and wound complications) and the time between surgery and radiographic union will be similar for both techniques.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of pediatric ulnar fracture patients treated at our facility was performed. Demographic and health information associated with the injury were collected, and the clinical outcomes of the two techniques were compared.

Results

A total of 53 patients with 54 fractures were included in this study. Antegrade nail insertion was used to treat 59.2% fractures. Radiographic union was achieved in all patients. Nail insertion technique was not associated with postoperative wound complications, time to radiographic union or implant removal, or significant deficits in upper extremity rotation (P > 0.05). Antegrade nailing resulted in a symptomatic implantation 3.97 times more frequently than compared with retrograde nailing (P = 0.036).

Discussion

Antegrade nailing demonstrates a similar healing profile but higher implant complications compared with the retrograde nailing technique in pediatric ulnar fractures.

Monteggia Fracture in an Extremely Preterm Infant with Biochemical Rickets: A Case Report

CASE

A preterm neonate with biochemical rickets is found to have a Monteggia fracture. The infant underwent percutaneous pinning. There was loss of fixation; however, the infant has been followed since discharge from the hospital and has completely healed with full range of motion.

CONCLUSIONS

The medical management of this entity involves enteral feedings and optimization of nutrients. The optimal surgical treatment of this injury in the neonatal period is not yet known, although percutaneous pinning resulted in normal healing and function. These aspects require clinician awareness of this unique fracture type in a premature patient with fragile bone.

Effect of ulnar angulation and soft tissue sectioning on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries: an in vitro biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Radial head instability continues to be a challenge in the management of anterior Monteggia injuries; however, there is a paucity of literature on the factors that contribute to this instability. The aim of this biomechanical investigation was to examine the effects of ulnar angulation and soft tissue insufficiency on radial head stability in anterior Monteggia injuries.

METHODS

Six cadaveric arms were mounted in an elbow motion simulator. Radial head translation was measured during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm supinated. After testing the elbows in the intact state, the ulna was osteotomized and tested at 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° of extension angulation. To examine the effect of soft tissue insufficiency, the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule, annular ligament, quadrate ligament, and the proximal and middle interosseous membrane (IOM) were sequentially sectioned.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in anterior radial head translation with greater ulnar extension angulation. Sequential soft tissue sectioning also significantly increased anterior radial head translation. There was no increase in radial head translation with isolated sectioning of the anterior radiocapitellar joint capsule. Additional sectioning of the annular ligament and quadrate ligament slightly increased anterior radial head translation but did not reach statistical significance. Subsequent sectioning of the proximal and middle IOM resulted in significant increases in anterior radial head translation.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that progressive ulnar extension angulation results in an incremental increase in anterior radial head translation in anterior Monteggia injuries. Moreover, increasing magnitudes of soft tissue disruption result in greater anterior radial head instability.

Missed Diagnosis and Acute Management of Radial Head Dislocation With Plastic Deformation of Ulna in Children

BACKGROUND

Radial head dislocation with ulnar bowing (Monteggia type I equivalent injury) is a frequently missed injury. If not recognized acutely, these missed injuries can lead to serious long-term complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of missed diagnosis and to report on the characteristics and early management of this specific injury pattern.

METHODS

A total of 112 patients with Monteggia fracture-dislocation were identified, of which 18 patients had sustained a Monteggia type I equivalent injury. The total duration between injury, diagnosis, and treatment was noted. Medical records were reviewed to identify cases with the initially missed diagnosis. The radiographic assessment included the direction of radial head dislocation and location/displacement of the apex of the ulnar bow. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Kim elbow performance score.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 18 cases with Monteggia equivalent injury were missed at the initial presentation. The diagnosis was established when the patients followed up in the orthopaedic clinic. Of these 18 patients, 11 were treated by closed reduction/cast and 7 patients required surgery. Significant differences were found between the closed reduction/cast and operative group for the mean time from injury to treatment (3.2±2.6 vs. 12.7±13.6 d). For each day of delay in treatment, the odds for surgical intervention increased by a factor of 1.126 (12.6%). There were no significant differences between the location and magnitude of the apex of the ulnar deformity between the 2 groups. Kim elbow score was excellent in all cases at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical suspicion and careful radiographic assessment are of utmost importance for every child with forearm and elbow injury without an apparent fracture, as there is a high rate of missed diagnosis for this specific Monteggia injury pattern. Prompt treatment would allow for successful closed reduction while even minor delays would increase the need for surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, level III.

Monteggia lesion and its equivalents in children

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to evaluate our group of paediatric patients with Monteggia lesion and its equivalents and to compare the characteristics of basic types of these lesions concerning therapeutic approach and results of the treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 111 children treated in the Department of Pediatric and Trauma Surgery of the Thomayer Hospital in Prague between 2001 and 2013 (13 years). When evaluating the outcome of the therapy, Bruce's criteria modified by Letts that assesses range of movement, pain and deformity of the elbow joint were applied. Regarding the therapeutic approach, four groups were compared: nonoperative treatment, reduction and casting, closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) and opened reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Results were compared between three groups of patients (Monteggia lesions, displaced equivalents and non-displaced equivalents) using Fisher´s exact test with α set to 0.05.

RESULTS

In all, 46 patients were treated for (true) Monteggia lesion, 27 for non-displaced Monteggia equivalent and 38 for displaced equivalent. There is a statistically significant difference in therapeutic approach between all three groups of patients. There is no significant difference in outcome between Monteggia lesions and both types of Monteggia equivalents, but there is a statistically significant difference between displaced and non-displaced equivalents.

CONCLUSION

There are only two lesions that meet the criteria of Monteggia - (true) Monteggia lesion and displaced Monteggia equivalent. The non-displaced equivalent does not meet the criteria of Monteggia and, therefore, should not be termed a Monteggia equivalent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III - Retrospective comparative study.

The use of external fixation for the management of acute and chronic Monteggia fractures in children

PURPOSE

The main objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of acute (AMF) and chronic Monteggia fractures (CMF) in children treated by closed or open reduction and external fixation (EF).

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 26 patients with Monteggia fracture. Patients with AMF (time between trauma and surgery less than two weeks) were treated by closed reduction and EF of the ulna (Group A; 15 patients) while those with CMF (time between trauma and surgery more than three weeks) were managed by closed or open reduction and EF of the ulna (Group B; 11 patients). Clinical outcome was evaluated with radiography and the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome questionnaire (Quick DASH). Complications were recorded in both groups.

RESULTS

No secondary displacement, wire migration, consolidation delays, nonunion, malunion or re-fracture was noted. However, one patient in Group A (6.7%) developed heterotopic ossification of the ulna; the final functional outcome was good (Quick DASH score: 18.2). One case of postoperative redislocation of the radial head was detected in Group B (9.1%). Two patients (7.6%) developed transient pin tract infection. Despite the fact that 16 out of 26 patients (six in Group A and ten in Group B) complained of the clinical appearance and/or had intermittent residual pain on the injured side, the results were essentially the same between the two groups of patients (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

EF is an alternative for the management of acute and chronic paediatric Monteggia fractures. It provides satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes with relatively low rates of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Effect of soft tissue injury and ulnar angulation on radial head instability in a Bado type I Monteggia fracture model

The effects of soft tissue damage and ulnar angulation deformity on radial head instability in Monteggia fractures are unclear. We tested the hypothesis that radial head instability correlates with the magnitude of ulnar angular deformity and the degree of proximal forearm soft tissue injury in Bado type I Monteggia fractures.We performed a biomechanical study in 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. Monteggia fractures were simulated by anterior ulnar angulation osteotomy and sequential sectioning of ligamentous structures. We measured radial head displacement during passive mobility testing in pronation, supination, and neutral rotation using an electromagnetic tracking device. Measurements at various ligament sectioning stages and ulnar angulation substages were statistically compared with those in the intact elbow.Radial head displacement increased with sequential ligament sectioning and increased proportionally with the degree of anterior ulnar angulation. Annular ligament sectioning resulted in a significant increase in displacement only in pronation (P < .05). When the anterior ulnar deformity was reproduced, the radial head displaced least in supination. The addition of proximal interosseous membrane sectioning significantly increased the radial head displacement in supination (P < .05), regardless of the degree of anterior ulnar angulation.Our Monteggia fracture model showed that radial head instability is influenced by the degree of soft tissue damage and ulnar angulation. Annular ligament injury combined with a minimal (5°) ulnar deformity may cause elbow instability, especially in pronation. The proximal interosseous membrane contributes to radial head stability in supination, regardless of ulnar angulation, and proximal interosseous membrane injury led to significant radial head instability in supination.

CHRONIC MONTEGGIA FRACTURE-DISLOCATION IN CHILDREN SURGICAL STRATEGY AND RESULTS

Objective:

To report surgical techniques and results in the treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children.

Methods:

Six pediatric patients who had undergone a procedure involving the following 6 crucial surgical steps were retrospectively evaluated: 1- extended lateral approach, 2- fibrotic removal, 3-proximal ulnar osteotomy, 4- reduction of the radial head and transcapitellar temporary fixation, 5- ulnar fixation with a straight plate shaped according to the deformity generated by temporary fixation, and 6- transcapitellar Kirschner wire removal.

Results:

Four patients were women, and four showed the right-sided compromise. The mean age of patients was 8 years, and the minimum follow-up period was 12 months. The mean time from the onset of fracture to treatment was 6 months. Six patients underwent complete flexo/extension, and one patient had a complete prono-supination. In four patients, we observed loss of pronation (by 10° in two, 15° in one, and 20° in one), and one patient had a 15° decrease in supination. We did not observe any redislocation of the radial head in the follow-up evaluation. No complications were observed; the only complaint was salience of the ulnar plate.

Conclusions:

Our results demonstrated an effective option for the treatment of chronic Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children, even with a small study sample, following the presented technical and surgical strategies. Level of evidence IV, Therapeutic Studies.

Comparison of treatment methods for pediatric Monteggia fracture: Met vs missed radial head dislocation

Various methods are applied in the treatment of fresh and neglected Monteggia fractures. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of various treatment methods, and assess the complexity associated with missed radial head dislocation.All fracture patients were reviewed between Jan 2012 and Dec 2016. A detailed comparison was made of the treatment methods between fresh Monteggia fractures and neglected Monteggia fractures with missed diagnosis of dislocation.A preliminary analysis of clinical information from 1081 patients in our center was investigated, and 42 were included in the final analysis. The fresh group included 25 patients with an average Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 96.3 ± 2.7 and resulted in the following scores after treatment: 21 excellent, 3 good, and 1 fair. In the fresh group, 76% of patients received closed reduction. Treatment with a cast, elastic stable intramedullary nail, and the Kirschner wire stabilization with tension band wiring make up 80% of the choices for fixation treatment. No patients experienced associated vascular injuries, recurrent dislocation, or elbow dysfunction. The neglected group involved 17 patients with Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 92.1 ± 9.3 and resulted in the following scores after treatment: 10 excellent, 4 good, and 3 fair. The locking compression plate (LCP) was the most common choice for postoperative immobilization in the neglected group (88.2%). Three patients in the neglected group experienced recurrent dislocation.This retrospective analysis indicates that the treatment of neglected Monteggia fractures is more complex than that of fresh Monteggia fractures, and usually results in a worse recovery rate with a higher rate of recurrent dislocation and elbow dysfunction.

Acute Pediatric Monteggia Fractures: A Conservative Approach to Stabilization

BACKGROUND

In 2015, a multicenter study group proposed a treatment algorithm for pediatric Monteggia fractures based upon the ulnar fracture pattern. This strategy recommends surgical stabilization for all complete ulna fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an initial nonoperative approach to pediatric Monteggia fractures resulted in poorer outcomes and a higher rate of complications.

METHODS

This institutional review board approved retrospective study evaluated all Monteggia fractures presenting to a level 1 pediatric trauma center between 2008 and 2014. Chart and radiographic reviews were performed on 94 patients who met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 5.5 years (range, 1 to 13 y). The mean clinical follow-up was 18 weeks. Major complications were defined as those requiring an unplanned second procedure (other than implant removal) or that may result in long-term disability (residual radial head subluxation/dislocation). Univariate (P<0.05) and Multivariate Classification and Regression Tree (CART) (P<0.05) analyses were used to identify variables associated with the need for surgical stabilization.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, there were no cases of residual radiocapitellar joint subluxation or dislocation and all fractures had healed. The majority (83%) of patients were successfully managed with a cast. Univariate analysis found Bado type and maximum ulna angulation as significant predictors (P<0.05), whereas the CART analysis found ulna angulation >36.5 degrees as the only primary predictor of requiring surgical stabilization. Overall, good outcomes were achieved in all patients with few major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although treatment algorithms are intended to minimize complications and maximize good outcomes, we believe that an unintentional consequence of the recently proposed pediatric Monteggia fracture treatment guideline may be the overtreatment of these injuries. In our cohort, the majority of patients were able to avoid the operating room and surgical implants without compromising outcomes or complications. This more conservative approach, however, requires close monitoring of patients in the first 3 weeks during which most reductions were lost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-therapeutic studies, case series.

[Fractures of the upper limbs in childhood and adolescence]

Fractures of the upper limbs are frequent and often need operative treatment in addition to a well-indicated conservative management. This depends on the maturity of the nearest growth plate and the local remodeling potential, which is dependent on age. Following conventional x‑ray imaging an individual prognostic growth analysis leads to the therapeutic decision. Around the elbow and the shaft of the forearm, criteria are stricter than near the shoulder or wrist. Gilchrist or Desault bandages as well as braces are adequate for most subcapital and humeral shaft fractures. The short forearm cast is the method of choice at the wrist. In the case of osteosynthesis the elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) method is the first choice for subcapital humerus, radial neck and shaft fractures. Screw fixation is usually carried out for epicondylar and condylar fractures and for supracondylar and wrist fractures K‑wires represent the standard procedure.

Stability-based assessment of Monteggia-type injuries predicts failure of treatment

Paediatric Monteggia-type injuries are complicated by treatment failure and posterior interosseous nerve palsy, without reliable predictive indicators. Outcome is considered to be good, with little patient-reported evidence. We propose novel radiographic parameters. A total of 33 Monteggia-type injuries were analysed. Posterior interosseous nerve palsy was strongly predicted by the Radial Head Displacement Index. The presence of two or more of three novel instability markers was associated strongly with treatment failure. Patient-reported outcome measures were almost uniformly excellent. We advocate the use of a new, inclusive, stability-based classification of Monteggia-type injuries to predict patients who require accurate internal fixation.

Successful Strategies for Managing Monteggia Injuries

Monteggia fracture-dislocations refer to traumatic ulnar fractures associated with proximal radioulnar and radiocapitellar joint instability. Careful clinical and radiographic evaluation of the entire limb in the acutely injured child is critical for timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Treatment principles include restoring and maintaining both ulnar length and alignment as well as radiocapitellar joint reduction. Recent information suggests that surgical treatment of acute injuries associated with complete ulnar fractures is safe and effective in maintaining bone and joint alignment. In cases of late presentation or missed diagnoses, chronic reconstruction may be considered in symptomatic patients with preserved radiocapitellar morphology. Although challenging, ulnar osteotomy and open joint reduction with or without ligament reconstruction may restore joint congruity in the majority of patients.

Management of complications of forearm fractures

Forearm fractures may be complicated by the disruption of the distal radioulnar, proximal radioulnar, or radiocapitellar joints. The key principles in treating this unique subset of fractures include early recognition and management of the injury and restoration and maintenance of the anatomic alignment. This articles addresses radial diaphyseal fractures with distal radioulnar joint disruption, proximal ulnar fractures with radiocapitellar disruption, and disruption of the forearm longitudinal axis and how to properly recognize and manage these forearm fracture-dislocations.