The Timing of Chemoprophylaxis in Autologous Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Efficacy and Morbidity of Heparin Infusion in Salvaging Autologous Breast Reconstruction Free Flaps

BACKGROUND

Abdominal-based free flaps are the mainstay in autologous breast reconstruction. Their safety and consistency in outcomes are well-documented. When flap compromise occurs, operative salvage is the gold standard. However, when-and if-to place these patients on heparin infusions is unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate abdominal-based free flap compromise and compare outcomes with and without heparin infusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-institution, multiple-surgeon, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing autologous, abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction who experienced anastomotic compromise within a 6-year period. Treatment and outcomes data collected include flap salvage, hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), transfusion requirement, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Fifty-one flaps had evidence of compromise. A total of 31 (60.8%) patients were placed on heparin infusions after experiencing anastomotic compromise, compared to 20 who did not receive heparin infusion. Thirty-five patients (68.6%) underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Twenty-six patients (51%) experienced venous congestion, 22 patients (43.1%) experienced arterial compromise, and three (5.9%) experienced both. Twenty-eight patients (54.9%) received tissue plasminogen activator; in the heparin infusion group, 21 patients (67.7%) received tissue plasminogen activator. The total salvage rate of compromised flaps was 94.1% (48/51). There was no significant difference between heparin infusion and standard cares in length of hospital stay, length of drains in-place, successful salvage (93.5% vs. 95%), hematoma (19.4% vs. 15%), fat necrosis, SSI, hospital readmission (19.4% vs. 15%), and return rates to the operating room (48.4% vs. 50%). However, there was a significantly higher transfusion rate in patients receiving heparin infusion (38.7% vs. 10%). Of the 25 flaps with evidence of thrombosis, 72% were placed on heparin infusions while 28% were not; there was no significant difference in salvage rate in this sub-group.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of autologous breast reconstruction free flap compromise provides evidence of similar safety profiles, with similar salvage rates, when comparing salvage with and without heparin infusion; there is a higher transfusion requirement when treating with heparin infusion.

Metabolic Syndrome, Kidney-Related Adiposity, and Kidney Microcirculation: Unraveling the Damage

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of interrelated risk factors, including insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and visceral adiposity, all of which contribute to kidney microvascular injury and the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the specific impact of each component of MetS on kidney microcirculation remains unclear. Given the increasing prevalence of obesity, understanding how visceral fat-particularly fat surrounding the kidneys-affects kidney microcirculation is critical. This review examines the consequences of visceral obesity and other components of MetS on renal microcirculation. These kidney-related fat deposits can contribute to the mechanical compression of renal vasculature, promote inflammation and oxidative stress, and induce endothelial dysfunction, all of which accelerate kidney damage. Each factor of MetS initiates a series of hemodynamic and metabolic disturbances that impair kidney microcirculation, leading to vascular remodeling and microvascular rarefaction. The review concludes by discussing therapeutic strategies targeting the individual components of MetS, which have shown promise in alleviating inflammation and oxidative stress. Integrated approaches that address both of the components of MetS and kidney-related adiposity may improve renal outcomes and slow the progression of CKD.

Use of Thromboprophylaxis after Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective Break-Even Analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major source of morbidity and mortality. The use of thromboprophylaxis among surgeons is not well studied in autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of VTE in patients with breast cancer undergoing autologous breast reconstruction and to compare the cost-effectiveness of postoperative chemoprophylactic agents.

METHODS

The TriNetX National Health Research Network database was used to identify patients with breast cancer who underwent autologous breast reconstruction surgery between 2002 and 2022. The incidence of VTE within the first 30 days of surgery was calculated. A break-even analysis was performed to determine the break-even rate of VTE at which a chemoprophylactic agent would be cost-effective.

RESULTS

A cohort of 8221 patients was identified in this study. The rate of VTE was significantly higher in those without anticoagulation (4.0%) compared with those who received anticoagulation (2.6%) ( P = 0.0008). The break-even analysis for heparin and enoxaparin cost-effectiveness yielded absolute risk reductions of 0.73% and 1.63% for high-risk patients requiring 30 days of therapy and 0.20% and 0.43% for moderate-risk patients requiring 7 days of therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of thromboprophylaxis significantly lowered the risk of VTE within 30 days after autologous breast reconstruction. Heparin appeared to be more cost-effective at preventing VTE compared with enoxaparin for both high- and moderate-risk patients. The presented model holds potential for other institution-specific variables that can be easily applied by plastic surgeons to determine the cost-effectiveness of any therapy.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Evidence-Based Approaches to Anticoagulation in Reconstructive Microsurgery-A Systematic Literature Review

This systematic review addresses the crucial role of anticoagulation in microsurgical procedures, focusing on free flap reconstruction and replantation surgeries. The objective was to balance the prevention of thrombotic complications commonly leading to flap failure, with the risk of increased bleeding complications associated with anticoagulant use. A meticulous PubMed literature search following Evidence-Based-Practice principles yielded 79 relevant articles, including both clinical and animal studies. The full-texts were carefully reviewed and evaluated by the modified Coleman methodology score. Clinical studies revealed diverse perioperative regimens, primarily based on aspirin, heparin, and dextran. Meta-analyses demonstrated similar flap loss rates with heparin or aspirin. High doses of dalteparin or heparin, however, correlated with higher flap loss rates than low dose administration. Use of dextran is not recommended due to severe systemic complications. In animal studies, systemic heparin administration showed predominantly favorable results, while topical application and intraluminal irrigation consistently exhibited significant benefits in flap survival. The insights from this conducted systematic review serve as a foundational pillar towards the establishment of evidence-based guidelines for anticoagulation in microsurgery. An average Coleman score of 55 (maximum 103), indicating low overall study quality, however, emphasizes the need for large multi-institutional, randomized-clinical trials as the next vital step.

Language Disparity Predicts Poor Patient-Reported Outcome and Follow-Up in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) have starkly different health care experiences compared with their English-proficient counterparts. The authors aim to examine the link between LEP and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction.

METHODS

 A retrospective review of all patients who underwent abdominal-based microsurgical breast reconstruction at our institution between 2009 and 2019 was performed. Variables collected included patient demographics, language status, interpreter usage, perioperative complications, follow-up visits, and self-reported outcomes (Breast-Q). Pearson's χ 2 test, Student's t-test, odds ratio analysis, and regression modeling were used for analysis.

RESULTS

 A total of 405 patients were included. LEP patients comprised 22.22% of the overall cohort with 80% of LEP patients utilizing interpreter services. LEP patients reported significantly lower satisfaction with an abdominal appearance at the 6-month follow-up and lower physical and sexual well-being scores at the 1-year follow-up (p = 0.05, 0.02, 0.01, respectively). Non-LEP patients had significantly longer operative times (539.6 vs. 499.3 minutes, p = 0.024), were more likely to have postoperative donor site revisions (p = 0.05), and more likely to receive preoperative neuraxial anesthesia (p = 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, LEP stats was associated with 0.93 fewer follow-up visits (p = 0.02). Interestingly, compared with LEP patients who did not receive interpreter services, LEP patients who did had 1.98 more follow-up visits (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in emergency room visits or complications between the cohorts.

CONCLUSION

 Our findings suggest that language disparities exist within microsurgical breast reconstruction and underscore the importance of effective, language-conscious communication between surgeon and patient.

Operative Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction: Key Concepts and Implementation

The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has become one of the most popular approaches for autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy. As much of health care has moved to a value-based approach, reducing complications, operative time, and length of stay in deep inferior flap reconstruction is becoming increasingly important. In this article, we discuss important preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations to maximize efficiency when performing autologous breast reconstruction and offer tips on how to handle certain challenges.

Safety and Efficacy of Extended Postdischarge Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Discharging patients on extended postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is trending in microsurgical breast reconstruction (MBR). This study investigated contemporary bleeding and thromboembolic complications after MBR and reported postdischarge enoxaparin outcomes.

Methods

The PearlDiver database was queried for MBR patients who did not receive postdischarge VTE prophylaxis (cohort 1) and MBR patients discharged with enoxaparin for at least 14 days (cohort 2), then queried for hematoma, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and/or pulmonary embolism. Concurrently, a systematic review was undertaken to identify studies investigating VTE with postoperative chemoprophylaxis.

Results

In total, 13,541 patients in cohort 1 and 786 patients in cohort 2 were identified. The incidence of hematoma, DVT, and pulmonary embolism were 3.51%, 1.01%, 0.55% in cohort 1, and 3.31%, 2.93%, and 1.78% in cohort 2, respectively. There was no significant difference in hematoma between these two cohorts (P = 0.767); however, a significantly lower rate of DVT (P < 0.001) and pulmonary embolism (P < 0.001) occurred in cohort 1. Ten studies met systematic review inclusion. Only three studies reported significantly lower VTE rates with postoperative chemoprophylaxis. Seven studies found no difference in bleeding risk.

Conclusions

This is the first study utilizing a national database and a systematic review to investigate extended postoperative enoxaparin in MBR. Overall, rates of DVT/PE seem to be declining compared with previous literature. The results of this study suggest that there remains a lack of evidence supporting extended postoperative chemoprophylaxis, although the therapy appears safe in that it does not increase bleeding risk.

Prolonged Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis May Not Be Necessary for DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Tertiary Center's 10-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

 Based on the 2005 Caprini Risk Assessment Model for venous thromboembolism, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons prevention guidelines would result in prolonged chemoprophylaxis (1 week or more) for the majority of patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. We aim to assess the necessity of prolonged prophylaxis by describing our institutional experience in thromboembolism prevention and evaluating the incidence of symptomatic VTE in our patient cohort.

METHODS

 Women who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction from August 2011 to March 2020 at a tertiary care center were included. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, VTE prophylaxis regimens, and development of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism within 60 days of surgery. Caprini scores were calculated for all patients.

RESULTS

 Out of the 249 patients included in the study, 245 patients received chemoprophylaxis only during hospitalization, while four patients additionally received anticoagulant for at least 2 weeks after discharge for prophylactic or therapeutic indications. The cohort's average Caprini score was 6.0, with 72.7% of scores between 3 and 6 and 26.5% at 7 or higher. One patient (0.4%), who scored a 7 and received prophylaxis only while hospitalized, developed deep vein thrombosis. There were no cases of pulmonary embolism. There was no significant difference in VTE rate between patients who received chemoprophylaxis consistent with ASPS guidelines and those who did not (p = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

 Despite our limited chemoprophylaxis use in DIEP flap patients, our VTE incidence is low. This current work suggests that the blanket application of prolonged prophylaxis is not warranted, and it further serves as impetus to re-evaluate the 2005 Caprini RAM in this patient population.