1
|
Graf R, Platzek PS, Riedel EO, Kim SH, Lenhart N, Ramschütz C, Paprottka KJ, Kertels OR, Möller HK, Atad M, Bülow R, Werner N, Völzke H, Schmidt CO, Wiestler B, Paetzold JC, Rueckert D, Kirschke JS. Generating synthetic high-resolution spinal STIR and T1w images from T2w FSE and low-resolution axial Dixon. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-11047-1. [PMID: 39231829 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11047-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To generate sagittal T1-weighted fast spin echo (T1w FSE) and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images from sagittal T2-weighted (T2w) FSE and axial T1w gradient echo Dixon technique (T1w-Dixon) sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study used three existing datasets: "Study of Health in Pomerania" (SHIP, 3142 subjects, 1.5 Tesla), "German National Cohort" (NAKO, 2000 subjects, 3 Tesla), and an internal dataset (157 patients 1.5/3 Tesla). We generated synthetic sagittal T1w FSE and STIR images from sagittal T2w FSE and low-resolution axial T1w-Dixon sequences based on two successively applied 3D Pix2Pix deep learning models. "Peak signal-to-noise ratio" (PSNR) and "structural similarity index metric" (SSIM) were used to evaluate the generated image quality on an ablations test. A Turing test, where seven radiologists rated 240 images as either natively acquired or generated, was evaluated using misclassification rate and Fleiss kappa interrater agreement. RESULTS Including axial T1w-Dixon or T1w FSE images resulted in higher image quality in generated T1w FSE (PSNR = 26.942, SSIM = 0.965) and STIR (PSNR = 28.86, SSIM = 0.948) images compared to using only single T2w images as input (PSNR = 23.076/24.677 SSIM = 0.952/0.928). Radiologists had difficulty identifying generated images (misclassification rate: 0.39 ± 0.09 for T1w FSE, 0.42 ± 0.18 for STIR) and showed low interrater agreement on suspicious images (Fleiss kappa: 0.09 for T1w/STIR). CONCLUSIONS Axial T1w-Dixon and sagittal T2w FSE images contain sufficient information to generate sagittal T1w FSE and STIR images. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT T1w fast spin echo and short tau inversion recovery can be retroactively added to existing datasets, saving MRI time and enabling retrospective analysis, such as evaluating bone marrow pathologies. KEY POINTS Sagittal T2-weighted images alone were insufficient for differentiating fat and water and to generate T1-weighted images. Axial T1w Dixon technique, together with a T2-weighted sequence, produced realistic sagittal T1-weighted images. Our approach can be used to retrospectively generate STIR and T1-weighted fast spin echo sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Graf
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Institut für KI und Informatik in der Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Paul-Sören Platzek
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Evamaria Olga Riedel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Su Hwan Kim
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Lenhart
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Constanze Ramschütz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karolin Johanna Paprottka
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Olivia Ruriko Kertels
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hendrik Kristian Möller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institut für KI und Informatik in der Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matan Atad
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institut für KI und Informatik in der Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Robin Bülow
- Institute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Nicole Werner
- Institut für Community Medicine, Abteilung SHIP-KEF, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Henry Völzke
- Institut für Community Medicine, Abteilung SHIP-KEF, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Carsten Oliver Schmidt
- Institut für Community Medicine, Abteilung SHIP-KEF, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes C Paetzold
- Professor of Visual Information Processing, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Institut für KI und Informatik in der Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Professor of Visual Information Processing, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Stefan Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chung CB, Pathria MN, Resnick D. MRI in MSK: is it the ultimate examination? Skeletal Radiol 2024; 53:1727-1735. [PMID: 38277028 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04601-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Christine B Chung
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - Mini N Pathria
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Donald Resnick
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feuerriegel GC, Goller SS, von Deuster C, Sutter R. Inflammatory Knee Synovitis: Evaluation of an Accelerated FLAIR Sequence Compared With Standard Contrast-Enhanced Imaging. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:599-604. [PMID: 38329824 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value and accuracy of a deep learning (DL)-accelerated fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence with fat saturation (FS) in patients with inflammatory synovitis of the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with suspected knee synovitis were retrospectively included between January and September 2023. All patients underwent a 3 T knee magnetic resonance imaging including a DL-accelerated noncontrast FLAIR FS sequence (acquisition time: 1 minute 38 seconds) and a contrast-enhanced (CE) T1-weighted FS sequence (acquisition time: 4 minutes 50 seconds), which served as reference standard. All knees were scored by 2 radiologists using the semiquantitative modified knee synovitis score, effusion synovitis score, and Hoffa inflammation score. Diagnostic confidence, image quality, and image artifacts were rated on separate Likert scales. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the semiquantitative scores. Interreader and intrareader reproducibility were calculated using Cohen κ. RESULTS Fifty-five patients (mean age, 52 ± 17 years; 28 females) were included in the study. Twenty-seven patients (49%) had mild to moderate synovitis (synovitis score 6-13), and 17 patients (31%) had severe synovitis (synovitis score >14). No signs of synovitis were detected in 11 patients (20%) (synovitis score <5). Semiquantitative assessment of the whole knee synovitis score showed no significant difference between the DL-accelerated FLAIR sequence and the CE T1-weighted sequence (mean FLAIR score: 10.69 ± 8.83, T1 turbo spin-echo FS: 10.74 ± 10.32; P = 0.521). Both interreader and intrareader reproducibility were excellent (range Cohen κ [0.82-0.96]). CONCLUSIONS Assessment of inflammatory knee synovitis using a DL-accelerated noncontrast FLAIR FS sequence was feasible and equivalent to CE T1-weighted FS imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg C Feuerriegel
- From the Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (G.C.F., S.S.G., R.S.); Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthineers International AG, Zurich, Switzerland (C.v.D.); and Swiss Center for Musculoskeletal Imaging, Balgrist Campus, Zurich, Switzerland (C.v.D.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guermazi A, Omoumi P, Tordjman M, Fritz J, Kijowski R, Regnard NE, Carrino J, Kahn CE, Knoll F, Rueckert D, Roemer FW, Hayashi D. How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging. Radiology 2024; 310:e230764. [PMID: 38165245 PMCID: PMC10831478 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
While musculoskeletal imaging volumes are increasing, there is a relative shortage of subspecialized musculoskeletal radiologists to interpret the studies. Will artificial intelligence (AI) be the solution? For AI to be the solution, the wide implementation of AI-supported data acquisition methods in clinical practice requires establishing trusted and reliable results. This implementation will demand close collaboration between core AI researchers and clinical radiologists. Upon successful clinical implementation, a wide variety of AI-based tools can improve the musculoskeletal radiologist's workflow by triaging imaging examinations, helping with image interpretation, and decreasing the reporting time. Additional AI applications may also be helpful for business, education, and research purposes if successfully integrated into the daily practice of musculoskeletal radiology. The question is not whether AI will replace radiologists, but rather how musculoskeletal radiologists can take advantage of AI to enhance their expert capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Guermazi
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Patrick Omoumi
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Mickael Tordjman
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Richard Kijowski
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Nor-Eddine Regnard
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - John Carrino
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Charles E. Kahn
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Florian Knoll
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Frank W. Roemer
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| | - Daichi Hayashi
- From the Department of Radiology, Boston University School of
Medicine, Boston, Mass (A.G., F.W.R., D.H.); Department of Radiology, VA Boston
Healthcare System, 1400 VFW Parkway, Suite 1B105, West Roxbury, MA 02132 (A.G.);
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of
Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (P.O.); Department of Radiology, Hotel Dieu
Hospital and University Paris Cité, Paris, France (M.T.); Department of
Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.,
R.K.); Gleamer, Paris, France (N.E.R.); Réseau d’Imagerie Sud
Francilien, Clinique du Mousseau Ramsay Santé, Evry, France (N.E.R.);
Pôle Médical Sénart, Lieusaint, France (N.E.R.); Department
of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY (J.C.); Department of Radiology and Institute for
Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn (C.E.K.);
Departments of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (F.K.) and
Radiology (F.W.R.), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen &
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,
Germany (F.K.); School of Medicine & Computation, Information and
Technology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich,
München, Germany (D.R.); Department of Computing, Imperial College
London, London, England (D.R.); and Department of Radiology, Tufts Medical
Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (D.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoon MA, Gold GE, Chaudhari AS. Accelerated Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023. [PMID: 38156716 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
With a substantial growth in the use of musculoskeletal MRI, there has been a growing need to improve MRI workflow, and faster imaging has been suggested as one of the solutions for a more efficient examination process. Consequently, there have been considerable advances in accelerated MRI scanning methods. This article aims to review the basic principles and applications of accelerated musculoskeletal MRI techniques including widely used conventional acceleration methods, more advanced deep learning-based techniques, and new approaches to reduce scan time. Specifically, conventional accelerated MRI techniques, including parallel imaging, compressed sensing, and simultaneous multislice imaging, and deep learning-based accelerated MRI techniques, including undersampled MR image reconstruction, super-resolution imaging, artifact correction, and generation of unacquired contrast images, are discussed. Finally, new approaches to reduce scan time, including synthetic MRI, novel sequences, and new coil setups and designs, are also reviewed. We believe that a deep understanding of these fast MRI techniques and proper use of combined acceleration methods will synergistically improve scan time and MRI workflow in daily practice. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min A Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Garry E Gold
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tong MW, Tolpadi AA, Bhattacharjee R, Han M, Majumdar S, Pedoia V. Synthetic Knee MRI T 1p Maps as an Avenue for Clinical Translation of Quantitative Osteoarthritis Biomarkers. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 11:17. [PMID: 38247894 PMCID: PMC10812962 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
A 2D U-Net was trained to generate synthetic T1p maps from T2 maps for knee MRI to explore the feasibility of domain adaptation for enriching existing datasets and enabling rapid, reliable image reconstruction. The network was developed using 509 healthy contralateral and injured ipsilateral knee images from patients with ACL injuries and reconstruction surgeries acquired across three institutions. Network generalizability was evaluated on 343 knees acquired in a clinical setting and 46 knees from simultaneous bilateral acquisition in a research setting. The deep neural network synthesized high-fidelity reconstructions of T1p maps, preserving textures and local T1p elevation patterns in cartilage with a normalized mean square error of 2.4% and Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.93. Analysis of reconstructed T1p maps within cartilage compartments revealed minimal bias (-0.10 ms), tight limits of agreement, and quantification error (5.7%) below the threshold for clinically significant change (6.42%) associated with osteoarthritis. In an out-of-distribution external test set, synthetic maps preserved T1p textures, but exhibited increased bias and wider limits of agreement. This study demonstrates the capability of image synthesis to reduce acquisition time, derive meaningful information from existing datasets, and suggest a pathway for standardizing T1p as a quantitative biomarker for osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle W. Tong
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (S.M.); (V.P.)
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Aniket A. Tolpadi
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (S.M.); (V.P.)
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Rupsa Bhattacharjee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (S.M.); (V.P.)
| | - Misung Han
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (S.M.); (V.P.)
| | - Sharmila Majumdar
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (S.M.); (V.P.)
| | - Valentina Pedoia
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (S.M.); (V.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kasuya S, Inaoka T, Wada A, Nakatsuka T, Nakagawa K, Terada H. Feasibility of the fat-suppression image-subtraction method using deep learning for abnormality detection on knee MRI. Pol J Radiol 2023; 88:e562-e573. [PMID: 38362017 PMCID: PMC10867951 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2023.133660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of using a deep learning (DL) model to generate fat-suppression images and detect abnormalities on knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) through the fat-suppression image-subtraction method. Material and methods A total of 45 knee MRI studies in patients with knee disorders and 12 knee MRI studies in healthy volunteers were enrolled. The DL model was developed using 2-dimensional convolutional neural networks for generating fat-suppression images and subtracting generated fat-suppression images without any abnormal findings from those with normal/abnormal findings and detecting/classifying abnormalities on knee MRI. The image qualities of the generated fat-suppression images and subtraction-images were assessed. The accuracy, average precision, average recall, F-measure, sensitivity, and area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of DL for each abnormality were calculated. Results A total of 2472 image datasets, each consisting of one slice of original T1WI, original intermediate-weighted images, generated fat-suppression (FS)-intermediate-weighted images without any abnormal findings, generated FS-intermediate-weighted images with normal/abnormal findings, and subtraction images between the generated FS-intermediate-weighted images at the same cross-section, were created. The generated fat-suppression images were of adequate image quality. Of the 2472 subtraction-images, 2203 (89.1%) were judged to be of adequate image quality. The accuracies for overall abnormalities, anterior cruciate ligament, bone marrow, cartilage, meniscus, and others were 89.5-95.1%. The average precision, average recall, and F-measure were 73.4-90.6%, 77.5-89.4%, and 78.4-89.4%, respectively. The sensitivity was 57.4-90.5%. The AUROCs were 0.910-0.979. Conclusions The DL model was able to generate fat-suppression images of sufficient quality to detect abnormalities on knee MRI through the fat-suppression image-subtraction method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shusuke Kasuya
- Department of Radiology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Inaoka
- Department of Radiology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Akihiko Wada
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoya Nakatsuka
- Department of Radiology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Koichi Nakagawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Terada
- Department of Radiology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walter SS, Fritz B, Kijowski R, Fritz J. 2D versus 3D MRI of osteoarthritis in clinical practice and research. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:2211-2224. [PMID: 36907953 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04309-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Accurately detecting and characterizing articular cartilage defects is critical in assessing patients with osteoarthritis. While radiography is the first-line imaging modality, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most accurate for the noninvasive assessment of articular cartilage. Multiple semiquantitative grading systems for cartilage lesions in MRI were developed. The Outerbridge and modified Noyes grading systems are commonly used in clinical practice and for research. Other useful grading systems were developed for research, many of which are joint-specific. Both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) pulse sequences are used to assess cartilage morphology and biochemical composition. MRI techniques for morphological assessment of articular cartilage can be categorized into 2D and 3D FSE/TSE spin-echo and gradient-recalled echo sequences. T2 mapping is most commonly used to qualitatively assess articular cartilage microstructural composition and integrity, extracellular matrix components, and water content. Quantitative techniques may be able to label articular cartilage alterations before morphological defects are visible. Accurate detection and characterization of shallow low-grade partial and small articular cartilage defects are the most challenging for any technique, but where high spatial resolution 3D MRI techniques perform best. This review article provides a practical overview of commonly used 2D and 3D MRI techniques for articular cartilage assessments in osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven S Walter
- Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 1St Ave, 3rd Floor, Rm 313, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Fritz
- Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Richard Kijowski
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Jan Fritz
- Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 660 1St Ave, 3rd Floor, Rm 313, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Debs P, Fayad LM. The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2023; 3:1242902. [PMID: 37609456 PMCID: PMC10440743 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2023.1242902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
With the recent developments in deep learning and the rapid growth of convolutional neural networks, artificial intelligence has shown promise as a tool that can transform several aspects of the musculoskeletal imaging cycle. Its applications can involve both interpretive and non-interpretive tasks such as the ordering of imaging, scheduling, protocoling, image acquisition, report generation and communication of findings. However, artificial intelligence tools still face a number of challenges that can hinder effective implementation into clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to explore both the successes and limitations of artificial intelligence applications throughout the muscuskeletal imaging cycle and to highlight how these applications can help enhance the service radiologists deliver to their patients, resulting in increased efficiency as well as improved patient and provider satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Debs
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Laura M. Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schlaeger S, Drummer K, El Husseini M, Kofler F, Sollmann N, Schramm S, Zimmer C, Wiestler B, Kirschke JS. Synthetic T2-weighted fat sat based on a generative adversarial network shows potential for scan time reduction in spine imaging in a multicenter test dataset. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:5882-5893. [PMID: 36928566 PMCID: PMC10326102 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09512-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES T2-weighted (w) fat sat (fs) sequences, which are important in spine MRI, require a significant amount of scan time. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can generate synthetic T2-w fs images. We evaluated the potential of synthetic T2-w fs images by comparing them to their true counterpart regarding image and fat saturation quality, and diagnostic agreement in a heterogenous, multicenter dataset. METHODS A GAN was used to synthesize T2-w fs from T1- and non-fs T2-w. The training dataset comprised scans of 73 patients from two scanners, and the test dataset, scans of 101 patients from 38 multicenter scanners. Apparent signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios (aSNR/aCNR) were measured in true and synthetic T2-w fs. Two neuroradiologists graded image (5-point scale) and fat saturation quality (3-point scale). To evaluate whether the T2-w fs images are indistinguishable, a Turing test was performed by eleven neuroradiologists. Six pathologies were graded on the synthetic protocol (with synthetic T2-w fs) and the original protocol (with true T2-w fs) by the two neuroradiologists. RESULTS aSNR and aCNR were not significantly different between the synthetic and true T2-w fs images. Subjective image quality was graded higher for synthetic T2-w fs (p = 0.023). In the Turing test, synthetic and true T2-w fs could not be distinguished from each other. The intermethod agreement between synthetic and original protocol ranged from substantial to almost perfect agreement for the evaluated pathologies. DISCUSSION The synthetic T2-w fs might replace a physical T2-w fs. Our approach validated on a challenging, multicenter dataset is highly generalizable and allows for shorter scan protocols. KEY POINTS • Generative adversarial networks can be used to generate synthetic T2-weighted fat sat images from T1- and non-fat sat T2-weighted images of the spine. • The synthetic T2-weighted fat sat images might replace a physically acquired T2-weighted fat sat showing a better image quality and excellent diagnostic agreement with the true T2-weighted fat images. • The present approach validated on a challenging, multicenter dataset is highly generalizable and allows for significantly shorter scan protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Schlaeger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Katharina Drummer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kofler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TranslaTUM - Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Severin Schramm
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nykänen O, Nevalainen M, Casula V, Isosalo A, Inkinen S, Nikki M, Lattanzi R, Cloos M, Nissi MJ, Nieminen MT. Deep-Learning-Based Contrast Synthesis From MRF Parameter Maps in the Knee Joint. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 58:559-568. [PMID: 36562500 PMCID: PMC10287835 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a method to speed up acquisition of quantitative MRI data. However, MRF does not usually produce contrast-weighted images that are required by radiologists, limiting reachable total scan time improvement. Contrast synthesis from MRF could significantly decrease the imaging time. PURPOSE To improve clinical utility of MRF by synthesizing contrast-weighted MR images from the quantitative data provided by MRF, using U-nets that were trained for the synthesis task utilizing L1- and perceptual loss functions, and their combinations. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION Knee joint MRI data from 184 subjects from Northern Finland 1986 Birth Cohort (ages 33-35, gender distribution not available). FIELD STRENGTH AND SEQUENCE A 3 T, multislice-MRF, proton density (PD)-weighted 3D-SPACE (sampling perfection with application optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution), fat-saturated T2-weighted 3D-space, water-excited double echo steady state (DESS). ASSESSMENT Data were divided into training, validation, test, and radiologist's assessment sets in the following way: 136 subjects to training, 3 for validation, 3 for testing, and 42 for radiologist's assessment. The synthetic and target images were evaluated using 5-point Likert scale by two musculoskeletal radiologists blinded and with quantitative error metrics. STATISTICAL TESTS Friedman's test accompanied with post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank test and intraclass correlation coefficient. The statistical cutoff P <0.05 adjusted by Bonferroni correction as necessary was utilized. RESULTS The networks trained in the study could synthesize conventional images with high image quality (Likert scores 3-4 on a 5-point scale). Qualitatively, the best synthetic images were produced with combination of L1- and perceptual loss functions and perceptual loss alone, while L1-loss alone led to significantly poorer image quality (Likert scores below 3). The interreader and intrareader agreement were high (0.80 and 0.92, respectively) and significant. However, quantitative image quality metrics indicated best performance for the pure L1-loss. DATA CONCLUSION Synthesizing high-quality contrast-weighted images from MRF data using deep learning is feasible. However, more studies are needed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of these synthetic images. EVIDENCE LEVEL 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY Stage 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olli Nykänen
- Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Science and Forestry, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 F, Kuopio, Finland
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5 A, Oulu
| | - Mika Nevalainen
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5 A, Oulu
- Medical Research Center, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, Finland
| | - Victor Casula
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5 A, Oulu
- Medical Research Center, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, Finland
| | - Antti Isosalo
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5 A, Oulu
| | - Satu Inkinen
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5 A, Oulu
- Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marko Nikki
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, Finland
| | - Riccardo Lattanzi
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R) and Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martijn Cloos
- Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland, Building 57 of University Dr, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mikko J. Nissi
- Department of Applied Physics, Faculty of Science and Forestry, University of Eastern Finland, Yliopistonranta 1 F, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Miika T. Nieminen
- Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Aapistie 5 A, Oulu
- Medical Research Center, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sneag DB, Abel F, Potter HG, Fritz J, Koff MF, Chung CB, Pedoia V, Tan ET. MRI Advancements in Musculoskeletal Clinical and Research Practice. Radiology 2023; 308:e230531. [PMID: 37581501 PMCID: PMC10477516 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decades, MRI has become increasingly important for diagnosing and longitudinally monitoring musculoskeletal disorders, with ongoing hardware and software improvements aiming to optimize image quality and speed. However, surging demand for musculoskeletal MRI and increased interest to provide more personalized care will necessitate a stronger emphasis on efficiency and specificity. Ongoing hardware developments include more powerful gradients, improvements in wide-bore magnet designs to maintain field homogeneity, and high-channel phased-array coils. There is also interest in low-field-strength magnets with inherently lower magnetic footprints and operational costs to accommodate global demand in middle- and low-income countries. Previous approaches to decrease acquisition times by means of conventional acceleration techniques (eg, parallel imaging or compressed sensing) are now largely overshadowed by deep learning reconstruction algorithms. It is expected that greater emphasis will be placed on improving synthetic MRI and MR fingerprinting approaches to shorten overall acquisition times while also addressing the demand of personalized care by simultaneously capturing microstructural information to provide greater detail of disease severity. Authors also anticipate increased research emphasis on metal artifact reduction techniques, bone imaging, and MR neurography to meet clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl B. Sneag
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (D.B.S., F.A., H.G.P., M.F.K.,
E.T.T.); Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of
Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San
Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); and Department of Radiology
and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
Calif (V.P.)
| | - Frederik Abel
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (D.B.S., F.A., H.G.P., M.F.K.,
E.T.T.); Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of
Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San
Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); and Department of Radiology
and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
Calif (V.P.)
| | - Hollis G. Potter
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (D.B.S., F.A., H.G.P., M.F.K.,
E.T.T.); Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of
Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San
Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); and Department of Radiology
and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
Calif (V.P.)
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (D.B.S., F.A., H.G.P., M.F.K.,
E.T.T.); Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of
Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San
Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); and Department of Radiology
and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
Calif (V.P.)
| | - Matthew F. Koff
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (D.B.S., F.A., H.G.P., M.F.K.,
E.T.T.); Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of
Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San
Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); and Department of Radiology
and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
Calif (V.P.)
| | - Christine B. Chung
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (D.B.S., F.A., H.G.P., M.F.K.,
E.T.T.); Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of
Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San
Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); and Department of Radiology
and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
Calif (V.P.)
| | - Valentina Pedoia
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (D.B.S., F.A., H.G.P., M.F.K.,
E.T.T.); Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of
Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San
Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); and Department of Radiology
and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
Calif (V.P.)
| | - Ek T. Tan
- From the Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special
Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 (D.B.S., F.A., H.G.P., M.F.K.,
E.T.T.); Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of
Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); Department of Radiology, University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); Radiology Service, Veterans Affairs San
Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, Calif (C.B.C.); and Department of Radiology
and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco,
Calif (V.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Park EH, Fritz J. The role of imaging in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101866. [PMID: 37659890 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis is a complex whole-organ disorder that involves molecular, anatomic, and physiologic derangement. Advances in imaging techniques have expanded the role of imaging in evaluating osteoarthritis and functional changes. Radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography are commonly used imaging modalities, each with advantages and limitations in evaluating osteoarthritis. Radiography comprehensively analyses alignment and osseous features, while MRI provides detailed information about cartilage damage, bone marrow edema, synovitis, and soft tissue abnormalities. Compositional imaging derives quantitative data for detecting cartilage and tendon degeneration before structural damage occurs. Ultrasonography permits real-time scanning and dynamic joint evaluation, whereas CT is useful for assessing final osseous detail. Imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis, management, and research of osteoarthritis. The use of imaging can help differentiate osteoarthritis from other diseases with similar symptoms, and recent advances in deep learning have made the acquisition, management, and interpretation of imaging data more efficient and accurate. Imaging is useful in monitoring and predicting the prognosis of osteoarthritis, expanding our understanding of its pathophysiology. Ultimately, this enables early detection and personalized medicine for patients with osteoarthritis. This article reviews the current state of imaging in osteoarthritis, focusing on the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, and introduces advanced techniques, including deep learning, applied in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Hae Park
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA; Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jan Fritz
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schlaeger S, Drummer K, Husseini ME, Kofler F, Sollmann N, Schramm S, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS, Wiestler B. Implementation of GAN-Based, Synthetic T2-Weighted Fat Saturated Images in the Routine Radiological Workflow Improves Spinal Pathology Detection. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13050974. [PMID: 36900118 PMCID: PMC10000723 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background and Purpose: In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine, T2-weighted (T2-w) fat-saturated (fs) images improve the diagnostic assessment of pathologies. However, in the daily clinical setting, additional T2-w fs images are frequently missing due to time constraints or motion artifacts. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) can generate synthetic T2-w fs images in a clinically feasible time. Therefore, by simulating the radiological workflow with a heterogenous dataset, this study's purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic value of additional synthetic, GAN-based T2-w fs images in the clinical routine. (2) Methods: 174 patients with MRI of the spine were retrospectively identified. A GAN was trained to synthesize T2-w fs images from T1-w, and non-fs T2-w images of 73 patients scanned in our institution. Subsequently, the GAN was used to create synthetic T2-w fs images for the previously unseen 101 patients from multiple institutions. In this test dataset, the additional diagnostic value of synthetic T2-w fs images was assessed in six pathologies by two neuroradiologists. Pathologies were first graded on T1-w and non-fs T2-w images only, then synthetic T2-w fs images were added, and pathologies were graded again. Evaluation of the additional diagnostic value of the synthetic protocol was performed by calculation of Cohen's ĸ and accuracy in comparison to a ground truth (GT) grading based on real T2-w fs images, pre- or follow-up scans, other imaging modalities, and clinical information. (3) Results: The addition of the synthetic T2-w fs to the imaging protocol led to a more precise grading of abnormalities than when grading was based on T1-w and non-fs T2-w images only (mean ĸ GT versus synthetic protocol = 0.65; mean ĸ GT versus T1/T2 = 0.56; p = 0.043). (4) Conclusions: The implementation of synthetic T2-w fs images in the radiological workflow significantly improves the overall assessment of spine pathologies. Thereby, high-quality, synthetic T2-w fs images can be virtually generated by a GAN from heterogeneous, multicenter T1-w and non-fs T2-w contrasts in a clinically feasible time, which underlines the reproducibility and generalizability of our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Schlaeger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Katharina Drummer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Malek El Husseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kofler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany
- TranslaTUM—Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingostaedter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Severin Schramm
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Jan S. Kirschke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TUM-NeuroImaging Center, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Implementation of artificial intelligence in thoracic imaging-a what, how, and why guide from the European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI). Eur Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00330-023-09409-2. [PMID: 36729173 PMCID: PMC9892666 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09409-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
This statement from the European Society of Thoracic imaging (ESTI) explains and summarises the essentials for understanding and implementing Artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice in thoracic radiology departments. This document discusses the current AI scientific evidence in thoracic imaging, its potential clinical utility, implementation and costs, training requirements and validation, its' effect on the training of new radiologists, post-implementation issues, and medico-legal and ethical issues. All these issues have to be addressed and overcome, for AI to become implemented clinically in thoracic radiology. KEY POINTS: • Assessing the datasets used for training and validation of the AI system is essential. • A departmental strategy and business plan which includes continuing quality assurance of AI system and a sustainable financial plan is important for successful implementation. • Awareness of the negative effect on training of new radiologists is vital.
Collapse
|
16
|
Burke CJ, Fritz J, Samim M. Musculoskeletal Soft-tissue Masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2023; 31:285-308. [PMID: 37019551 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Evaluation of soft-tissue masses has become a common clinical practice indication for imaging with both ultrasound and MR imaging. We illustrate the ultrasonography and MR imaging appearances of soft-tissue masses based on the various categories, updates, and reclassifications of the 2020 World Health Organization classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Burke
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA.
| | - Jan Fritz
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Mohammad Samim
- NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT This review summarizes the existing techniques and methods used to generate synthetic contrasts from magnetic resonance imaging data focusing on musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging. To that end, the different approaches were categorized into 3 different methodological groups: mathematical image transformation, physics-based, and data-driven approaches. Each group is characterized, followed by examples and a brief overview of their clinical validation, if present. Finally, we will discuss the advantages, disadvantages, and caveats of synthetic contrasts, focusing on the preservation of image information, validation, and aspects of the clinical workflow.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
This article provides a focused overview of emerging technology in musculoskeletal MRI and CT. These technological advances have primarily focused on decreasing examination times, obtaining higher quality images, providing more convenient and economical imaging alternatives, and improving patient safety through lower radiation doses. New MRI acceleration methods using deep learning and novel reconstruction algorithms can reduce scanning times while maintaining high image quality. New synthetic techniques are now available that provide multiple tissue contrasts from a limited amount of MRI and CT data. Modern low-field-strength MRI scanners can provide a more convenient and economical imaging alternative in clinical practice, while clinical 7.0-T scanners have the potential to maximize image quality. Three-dimensional MRI curved planar reformation and cinematic rendering can provide improved methods for image representation. Photon-counting detector CT can provide lower radiation doses, higher spatial resolution, greater tissue contrast, and reduced noise in comparison with currently used energy-integrating detector CT scanners. Technological advances have also been made in challenging areas of musculoskeletal imaging, including MR neurography, imaging around metal, and dual-energy CT. While the preliminary results of these emerging technologies have been encouraging, whether they result in higher diagnostic performance requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Kijowski
- From the Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Ultra-Fast Superresolution MRI: 10-Fold Accelerated Musculoskeletal Turbo Spin Echo MRI Within Reach. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:28-42. [PMID: 36355637 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the keystone of modern musculoskeletal imaging; however, long pulse sequence acquisition times may restrict patient tolerability and access. Advances in MRI scanners, coil technology, and innovative pulse sequence acceleration methods enable 4-fold turbo spin echo pulse sequence acceleration in clinical practice; however, at this speed, conventional image reconstruction approaches the signal-to-noise limits of temporal, spatial, and contrast resolution. Novel deep learning image reconstruction methods can minimize signal-to-noise interdependencies to better advantage than conventional image reconstruction, leading to unparalleled gains in image speed and quality when combined with parallel imaging and simultaneous multislice acquisition. The enormous potential of deep learning-based image reconstruction promises to facilitate the 10-fold acceleration of the turbo spin echo pulse sequence, equating to a total acquisition time of 2-3 minutes for entire MRI examinations of joints without sacrificing spatial resolution or image quality. Current investigations aim for a better understanding of stability and failure modes of image reconstruction networks, validation of network reconstruction performance with external data sets, determination of diagnostic performances with independent reference standards, establishing generalizability to other centers, scanners, field strengths, coils, and anatomy, and building publicly available benchmark data sets to compare methods and foster innovation and collaboration between the clinical and image processing community. In this article, we review basic concepts of deep learning-based acquisition and image reconstruction techniques for accelerating and improving the quality of musculoskeletal MRI, commercially available and developing deep learning-based MRI solutions, superresolution, denoising, generative adversarial networks, and combined strategies for deep learning-driven ultra-fast superresolution musculoskeletal MRI. This article aims to equip radiologists and imaging scientists with the necessary practical knowledge and enthusiasm to meet this exciting new era of musculoskeletal MRI.
Collapse
|
20
|
Radiomics and Deep Learning for Disease Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology: An Overview of Novel MRI- and CT-Based Approaches. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:3-13. [PMID: 36070548 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Radiomics and machine learning-based methods offer exciting opportunities for improving diagnostic performance and efficiency in musculoskeletal radiology for various tasks, including acute injuries, chronic conditions, spinal abnormalities, and neoplasms. While early radiomics-based methods were often limited to a smaller number of higher-order image feature extractions, applying machine learning-based analytic models, multifactorial correlations, and classifiers now permits big data processing and testing thousands of features to identify relevant markers. A growing number of novel deep learning-based methods describe magnetic resonance imaging- and computed tomography-based algorithms for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament tears, meniscus tears, articular cartilage defects, rotator cuff tears, fractures, metastatic skeletal disease, and soft tissue tumors. Initial radiomics and deep learning techniques have focused on binary detection tasks, such as determining the presence or absence of a single abnormality and differentiation of benign versus malignant. Newer-generation algorithms aim to include practically relevant multiclass characterization of detected abnormalities, such as typing and malignancy grading of neoplasms. So-called delta-radiomics assess tumor features before and after treatment, with temporal changes of radiomics features serving as surrogate markers for tumor responses to treatment. New approaches also predict treatment success rates, surgical resection completeness, and recurrence risk. Practice-relevant goals for the next generation of algorithms include diagnostic whole-organ and advanced classification capabilities. Important research objectives to fill current knowledge gaps include well-designed research studies to understand how diagnostic performances and suggested efficiency gains of isolated research settings translate into routine daily clinical practice. This article summarizes current radiomics- and machine learning-based magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography approaches for musculoskeletal disease detection and offers a perspective on future goals and objectives.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art of musculoskeletal 7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the associated technological challenges, and gives an overview of current and future clinical applications of 1 H-based 7 T MRI. The higher signal-to-noise ratio at 7 T is predominantly used for increased spatial resolution and thus the visualization of anatomical details or subtle lesions rather than to accelerate the sequences. For musculoskeletal MRI, turbo spin echo pulse sequences are particularly useful, but with altered relaxation times, B1 inhomogeneity, and increased artifacts at 7 T; specific absorption rate limitation issues quickly arise for turbo spin echo pulse sequences. The development of dedicated pulse sequence techniques in the last 2 decades and the increasing availability of specialized coils now facilitate several clinical musculoskeletal applications. 7 T MRI is performed in vivo in a wide range of applications for the knee joint and other anatomical areas, such as ultra-high-resolution nerve imaging or bone trabecular microarchitecture imaging. So far, however, it has not been shown systematically whether the higher field strength compared with the established 3 T MRI systems translates into clinical advantages, such as an early-stage identification of tissue damage allowing for preventive therapy or an influence on treatment decisions and patient outcome. At the moment, results tend to suggest that 7 T MRI will be reserved for answering specific, targeted musculoskeletal questions rather than for a broad application, as is the case for 3 T MRI. Future data regarding the implementation of clinical use cases are expected to clarify if 7 T musculoskeletal MRI applications with higher diagnostic accuracy result in patient benefits compared with MRI at lower field strengths.
Collapse
|
22
|
MRI evaluation of soft tissue tumors: comparison of a fast, isotropic, 3D T2-weighted fat-saturated sequence with a conventional 2D T2-weighted fat-saturated sequence for tumor characteristics, resolution, and acquisition time. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:8670-8680. [PMID: 35751699 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08937-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test whether a 4-fold accelerated 3D T2-weighted (T2) CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE sequence with isotropic voxel size is equivalent to conventional 2DT2 TSE for the evaluation of intrinsic and perilesional soft tissue tumors (STT) characteristics. METHODS For 108 patients with histologically-proven STTs, MRI, including 3DT2 (CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE) and 2DT2 (TSE) sequences, was performed. Two radiologists evaluated each sequence for quality (diagnostic, non-diagnostic), tumor characteristics (heterogeneity, signal intensity, margin), and the presence or absence of cortical involvement, marrow edema, and perilesional edema (PLE); tumor size and PLE extent were measured. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios and acquisition times for 2DT2 in two planes and 3DT2 sequences were reported. Descriptive statistics and inter-method agreement were reported. RESULTS Image quality was diagnostic for all sequences (100% [108/108]). No difference was observed between 3DT2 and 2DT2 tumor characteristics (p < 0.05). There was no difference in mean tumor size (3DT2: 2.9 ± 2.5 cm, 2DT2: 2.8 ± 2.6 cm, p = 0.4) or PLE extent (3DT2:0.5 ± 1.2 cm, 2DT2:0.5 ± 1.0 cm, p = 0.9) between the sequences. There was no difference in the SNR of tumors, marrow, and fat between the sequences, whereas the SNR of muscle was higher (p < 0.05) on 3DT2 than 2DT2. CNR measures on 3DT2 were similar to 2DT2 (p > 0.1). The average acquisition time was shorter for 3DT2 compared with 2DT2 (343 ± 127 s vs 475 ± 162 s, respectively). CONCLUSION Isotropic 3DT2 MRI offers higher spatial resolution, faster acquisition times, and equivalent assessments of STT characteristics compared to conventional 2DT2 MRI in two planes. 3DT2 is interchangeable with a 2DT2 sequence in tumor protocols. KEY POINTS • Isotropic 3DT2 CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE offers higher spatial resolution than 2DT2 TSE and is equivalent to 2DT2 TSE for assessments of soft tissue tumor intrinsic and perilesional characteristics. • Multiplanar reformats of 3DT2 CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE can substitute for 2DT2 TSE acquired in multiple planes, thereby reducing the acquisition time of MRI tumor protocols. • 3DT2 CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE and 2DT2 TSE had similar CNR of tissues.
Collapse
|
23
|
Li J, Qian K, Liu J, Huang Z, Zhang Y, Zhao G, Wang H, Li M, Liang X, Zhou F, Yu X, Li L, Wang X, Yang X, Jiang Q. Identification and diagnosis of meniscus tear by magnetic resonance imaging using a deep learning model. J Orthop Translat 2022; 34:91-101. [PMID: 35847603 PMCID: PMC9253363 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Meniscus tear is a common problem in sports trauma, and its imaging diagnosis mainly relies on MRI. To improve the diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, a deep learning model was employed in this study and the identification efficiency was evaluated. Methods Standard knee MRI images from 924 individual patients were used to complete the training, validation and testing processes. Mask regional convolutional neural network (R–CNN) was used to build the deep learning network structure, and ResNet50 was adopted to develop the backbone network. The deep learning model was trained and validated with a dataset containing 504 and 220 patients, respectively. Internal testing was performed based on a dataset of 200 patients, and 180 patients from 8 hospitals were regarded as an external dataset for model validation. Additionally, 40 patients who were diagnosed by the arthroscopic surgery were enrolled as the final test dataset. Results After training and validation, the deep learning model effectively recognized healthy and injured menisci. Average precision for the three types of menisci (healthy, torn and degenerated menisci) ranged from 68% to 80%. Diagnostic accuracy for healthy, torn and degenerated menisci was 87.50%, 86.96%, and 84.78%, respectively. Validation results from external dataset demonstrated that the accuracy of diagnosing torn and intact meniscus tear through 3.0T MRI images was higher than 80%, while the accuracy verified by arthroscopic surgery was 87.50%. Conclusion Mask R–CNN effectively identified and diagnosed meniscal injuries, especially for tears that occurred in different parts of the meniscus. The recognition ability was admirable, and the diagnostic accuracy could be further improved with increased training sample size. Therefore, this deep learning model showed great potential in diagnosing meniscus injuries. Translational potential of this article Deep learning model exerted unique effect in terms of reducing doctors’ workload and improving diagnostic accuracy. Injured and healthy menisci could be more accurately identified and classified based on training and learning datasets. This model could also distinguish torn from degenerated menisci, making it an effective tool for MRI-assisted diagnosis of meniscus injuries in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Division of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, China
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, China
| | - Kun Qian
- Hangzhou Lancet Robotics Company Ltd, China
| | | | | | | | - Guoqian Zhao
- Danyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China
| | - Huifen Wang
- The Second People's Hospital of Xuanwei, China
| | - Meng Li
- Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science, China
| | - Xiaohan Liang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, China
| | | | - Xiuying Yu
- Lin Yi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China
| | - Lan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Division of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, China
| | - Xingsong Wang
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, China
- Corresponding author. No. 2 Southeast University Road, Nanjing, 210000, China.
| | - Xianfeng Yang
- Department of Radiology, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, China
- Corresponding author. No. 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210000, China.
| | - Qing Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Division of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Goergen SK, Frazer HM, Reddy S. Quality use of artificial intelligence in medical imaging: What do radiologists need to know? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:225-232. [PMID: 35243782 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The application of artificial intelligence, and in particular machine learning, to the practice of radiology, is already impacting the quality of imaging care. It will increasingly do so in the future. Radiologists need to be aware of factors that govern the quality of these tools at the development, regulatory and clinical implementation stages in order to make judicious decisions about their use in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy K Goergen
- Monash Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Imaging, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Ml Frazer
- St Vincent's BreastScreen, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,BreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sandeep Reddy
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Afat S, Wessling D, Afat C, Nickel D, Arberet S, Herrmann J, Othman AE, Gassenmaier S. Analysis of a Deep Learning-Based Superresolution Algorithm Tailored to Partial Fourier Gradient Echo Sequences of the Abdomen at 1.5 T: Reduction of Breath-Hold Time and Improvement of Image Quality. Invest Radiol 2022; 57:157-162. [PMID: 34510101 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and impact of a novel deep learning superresolution algorithm tailored to partial Fourier allowing retrospectively theoretical acquisition time reduction in 1.5 T T1-weighted gradient echo imaging of the abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty consecutive patients who underwent a 1.5 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging examination of the abdomen between April and May 2021 were included in this retrospective study. After acquisition of a conventional T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination using Dixon for water-fat separation (VIBEStd), the acquired data were reprocessed including a superresolution algorithm that was optimized for partial Fourier acquisitions (VIBESR). To accelerate theoretically the acquisition process, a more aggressive partial Fourier setting was applied in VIBESR reconstructions practically corresponding to a shorter acquisition for the data included in the retrospective reconstruction. Precontrast, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and postcontrast data sets were processed. Image analysis was performed by 2 radiologists independently in a blinded random order without access to clinical data regarding the following criteria using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 with 4 being the best: noise levels, sharpness and contrast of vessels, sharpness and contrast of organs and lymph nodes, overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, and lesion conspicuity.Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired data was applied to test for significance. RESULTS Mean patient age was 61 ± 14 years. Mean acquisition time for the conventional VIBEStd sequence was 15 ± 1 seconds versus theoretical 13 ± 1 seconds of acquired data used for the VIBESR reconstruction. Noise levels were evaluated to be better in VIBESR with a median of 4 (4-4) versus a median of 3 (3-3) in VIBEStd by both readers (P < 0.001). Sharpness and contrast of vessels as well as organs and lymph nodes were also evaluated to be superior in VIBESR compared with VIBEStd with a median of 4 (4-4) versus a median of 3 (3-3) (P < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence was also rated superior in VIBESR with a median of 4 (4-4) versus a median of 3.5 (3-4) in VIBEStd by reader 1 and with a median of 4 (4-4) for VIBESR and a median of 4 (4-4) for VIBEStd by reader 2 (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Image enhancement using deep learning-based superresolution tailored to partial Fourier acquisitions of T1-weighted gradient echo imaging of the abdomen provides improved image quality and diagnostic confidence in combination with more aggressive partial Fourier settings leading to shorter scan time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saif Afat
- From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
| | - Daniel Wessling
- From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
| | - Carmen Afat
- Internal Medicine I, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | - Dominik Nickel
- MR Applications Predevelopment, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Simon Arberet
- Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ
| | - Judith Herrmann
- From the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: a perspective on value propositions, clinical use, and obstacles. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:239-243. [PMID: 33983500 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03802-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and deep learning (DL) offer musculoskeletal radiology exciting possibilities in multiple areas, including image reconstruction and transformation, tissue segmentation, workflow support, and disease detection. Novel DL-based image reconstruction algorithms correcting aliasing artifacts, signal loss, and noise amplification with previously unobtainable effectiveness are prime examples of how DL algorithms deliver promised value propositions in musculoskeletal radiology. The speed of DL-based tissue segmentation promises great efficiency gains that may permit the inclusion of tissue compositional-based information routinely into radiology reports. Similarly, DL algorithms give rise to a myriad of opportunities for workflow improvements, including intelligent and adaptive hanging protocols, speech recognition, report generation, scheduling, precertification, and billing. The value propositions of disease-detecting DL algorithms include reduced error rates and increased productivity. However, more studies using authentic clinical workflow settings are necessary to fully understand the value of DL algorithms for disease detection in clinical practice. Successful workflow integration and management of multiple algorithms are critical for translating the value propositions of DL algorithms into clinical practice but represent a major roadblock for which solutions are critically needed. While there is no consensus about the most sustainable business model, radiology departments will need to carefully weigh the benefits and disadvantages of each commercially available DL algorithm. Although more studies are needed to understand the value and impact of DL algorithms on clinical practice, DL technology will likely play an important role in the future of musculoskeletal imaging.
Collapse
|
27
|
Yi PH, Arun A, Hafezi-Nejad N, Choy G, Sair HI, Hui FK, Fritz J. Can AI distinguish a bone radiograph from photos of flowers or cars? Evaluation of bone age deep learning model on inappropriate data inputs. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:401-406. [PMID: 34351456 PMCID: PMC8339162 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03880-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the behavior of a publicly available deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) bone age algorithm when presented with inappropriate data inputs in both radiological and non-radiological domains. METHODS We evaluated a publicly available DCNN-based bone age application. The DCNN was trained on 12,612 pediatric hand radiographs and won the 2017 RSNA Pediatric Bone Age Challenge (concordance of 0.991 with radiologist ground-truth). We used the application to analyze 50 left-hand radiographs (appropriate data inputs) and seven classes of inappropriate data inputs in radiological (i.e., chest radiographs) and non-radiological (i.e., image of street numbers) domains. For each image, we noted if (1) the application distinguished between appropriate and inappropriate data inputs and (2) inference time per image. Mean inference times were compared using ANOVA. RESULTS The 16Bit Bone Age application calculated bone age for all pediatric hand radiographs with mean inference time of 1.1 s. The application did not distinguish between pediatric hand radiographs and inappropriate image types, including radiological and non-radiological domains. The application inappropriately calculated bone age for all inappropriate image types, with mean inference time of 1.1 s for all categories (p = 1). CONCLUSION A publicly available DCNN-based bone age application failed to distinguish between appropriate and inappropriate data inputs and calculated bone age for inappropriate images. The awareness of inappropriate outputs based on inappropriate DCNN input is important if tasks such as bone age determination are automated, emphasizing the need for appropriate oversight at the data input and verification stage to avoid unrecognized erroneous results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H. Yi
- University of Maryland Intelligent Imaging (UMII) Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Anirudh Arun
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Nima Hafezi-Nejad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Garry Choy
- Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA USA
| | - Haris I. Sair
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Ferdinand K. Hui
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Jan Fritz
- Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Khodarahmi I, Fritz J. The Value of 3 Tesla Field Strength for Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Invest Radiol 2021; 56:749-763. [PMID: 34190717 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a careful negotiation between spatial, temporal, and contrast resolution, which builds the foundation for diagnostic performance and value. Many aspects of musculoskeletal MRI can improve the image quality and increase the acquisition speed; however, 3.0-T field strength has the highest impact within the current diagnostic range. In addition to the favorable attributes of 3.0-T field strength translating into high temporal, spatial, and contrast resolution, many 3.0-T MRI systems yield additional gains through high-performance gradients systems and radiofrequency pulse transmission technology, advanced multichannel receiver technology, and high-end surface coils. Compared with 1.5 T, 3.0-T MRI systems yield approximately 2-fold higher signal-to-noise ratios, enabling 4 times faster data acquisition or double the matrix size. Clinically, 3.0-T field strength translates into markedly higher scan efficiency, better image quality, more accurate visualization of small anatomic structures and abnormalities, and the ability to offer high-end applications, such as quantitative MRI and magnetic resonance neurography. Challenges of 3.0-T MRI include higher magnetic susceptibility, chemical shift, dielectric effects, and higher radiofrequency energy deposition, which can be managed successfully. The higher total cost of ownership of 3.0-T MRI systems can be offset by shorter musculoskeletal MRI examinations, higher-quality examinations, and utilization of advanced MRI techniques, which then can achieve higher gains and value than lower field systems. We provide a practice-focused review of the value of 3.0-T field strength for musculoskeletal MRI, practical solutions to challenges, and illustrations of a wide spectrum of gainful clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman Khodarahmi
- From the Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yi PH, Fritz J. Radiology Alchemy: GAN We Do It? Radiol Artif Intell 2021; 3:e210125. [PMID: 34617033 PMCID: PMC8489459 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021210125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul H. Yi
- From the University of Maryland Medical Intelligent Imaging Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (P.H.Y.); Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287 (P.H.Y.); and Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.)
| | - Jan Fritz
- From the University of Maryland Medical Intelligent Imaging Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (P.H.Y.); Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD 21287 (P.H.Y.); and Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gassenmaier S, Afat S, Nickel MD, Mostapha M, Herrmann J, Almansour H, Nikolaou K, Othman AE. Accelerated T2-Weighted TSE Imaging of the Prostate Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparison with Standard T2-Weighted TSE Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143593. [PMID: 34298806 PMCID: PMC8303682 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate has become the standard of care in prostate cancer evaluation. Recently, deep learning image reconstruction (DLR) methods have been introduced with promising results regarding scan acceleration. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of deep learning image reconstruction (DLR) in a shortened acquisition process of T2-weighted TSE imaging, regarding the image quality and diagnostic confidence, as well as PI-RADS and T2 scoring, as compared to standard T2 TSE imaging. Sixty patients undergoing 3T mpMRI for the evaluation of prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in this institutional review board-approved study between October 2020 and March 2021. After the acquisition of standard T2 TSE imaging (T2S), the novel T2 TSE sequence with DLR (T2DLR) was applied in three planes. Overall, the acquisition time for T2S resulted in 10:21 min versus 3:50 min for T2DLR. The image evaluation was performed by two radiologists independently using a Likert scale ranging from 1-4 (4 best) applying the following criteria: noise levels, artifacts, overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, and lesion conspicuity. Additionally, T2 and PI-RADS scoring were performed. The mean patient age was 69 ± 9 years (range, 49-85 years). The noise levels and the extent of the artifacts were evaluated to be significantly improved in T2DLR versus T2S by both readers (p < 0.05). Overall image quality was also evaluated to be superior in T2DLR versus T2S in all three acquisition planes (p = 0.005-<0.001). Both readers evaluated the item lesion conspicuity to be superior in T2DLR with a median of 4 versus a median of 3 in T2S (p = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). T2-weighted TSE imaging of the prostate in three planes with an acquisition time reduction of more than 60% including DLR is feasible with a significant improvement of image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Gassenmaier
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (S.G.); (S.A.); (J.H.); (H.A.); (K.N.)
| | - Saif Afat
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (S.G.); (S.A.); (J.H.); (H.A.); (K.N.)
| | | | - Mahmoud Mostapha
- Digital Technology & Innovation, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Princeton, NJ 08540, USA;
| | - Judith Herrmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (S.G.); (S.A.); (J.H.); (H.A.); (K.N.)
| | - Haidara Almansour
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (S.G.); (S.A.); (J.H.); (H.A.); (K.N.)
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (S.G.); (S.A.); (J.H.); (H.A.); (K.N.)
- Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) “Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies”, University of Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ahmed E. Othman
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (S.G.); (S.A.); (J.H.); (H.A.); (K.N.)
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-7071-29-68624; Fax: +49-7071-29-5845
| |
Collapse
|