Phase stability and magnetism of Ni3Al

Atomic structure of Al(89)La(6)Ni(5) metallic glass

Atomic structures of amorphous Al(89)La(6)Ni(5), prepared by single-roller melt spinning, and pre-annealed at 493 and 588 K for 1 h, were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry, x-ray diffraction with a large wavevector transfer value, La L(3)-edge and Ni K-edge x-ray absorption fine structure and the reverse Monte Carlo technique. In the as-prepared amorphous alloy, our study reveals that the Ni-Al distance is 2.38 ± 0.02 Å coupled with a coordination number as low as 6.2. The Al-Al distance was found to be ∼4.5% shorter than the nominal atomic diameter of aluminium and the coordination number to be ∼39% less than expected from the dense random packing model. Crystallization of the Al(89)La(6)Ni(5) glassy alloy at high temperatures can be described as follows: [amorphous alloy] [Formula: see text] [fcc-Al] + [bcc-(AlLa)] + residual amorphous [Formula: see text] [fcc-Al] + [o-Al(3)Ni ] + [o-La(3)Al(11) ].

Why Ni3Al is an itinerant ferromagnet but Ni3Ga is not

Ni3Al and Ni3Ga are closely related materials on opposite sides of a ferromagnetic quantum critical point. The Stoner factor of Ni is virtually the same in both compounds and the density of states is larger in Ni3Ga. Thus in Stoner theory it should be more magnetic, and in local-density approximation (LDA) calculations it is. However, experimentally it is a paramagnet, while Ni3Al is an itinerant ferromagnet. We show that critical spin fluctuations are stronger in Ni3Ga, due to weaker q dependence of the susceptibility, and this effect is enough to reverse the trend. The approach combines LDA calculations with Landau theory and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem using the same momentum cutoff for both compounds. The calculations provide evidence for strong, beyond LDA, spin fluctuations associated with the critical point in both materials, but stronger in Ni3Ga than in Ni3Al.