Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity and protect health: Wealthy nations must do much more, much faster: Wealthy nations must do much more, much faster

Avoiding an unjust transition to sustainability: An equity metric for spatial conservation planning

The need for rapid and ambitious conservation and restoration is widely acknowledged, yet concern exists that the widespread reallocation of land to nature would disproportionately affect the world's poor. Conservation and restoration may limit nutrition and livelihood options and thus negatively affect social development objectives. Although much research looks into global-scale scenarios and planning of conservation and restoration, spatial evaluations of these trade-offs in terms of equity remain limited. We fill this gap by identifying areas where conservation or restoration under different future scenarios and prioritization maps expand nature into landscapes that likely support land-dependent communities in their local food security. By contrasting the expansion of nature into areas supporting land-dependent communities vs. places where the food system is supported by regional to global markets, we highlight the need for disaggregated indicators that reflect the diversity of human land-use needs in order to identify more equitable pathways. Conservation prioritizations were found to result in more equitable land-use outcomes than the land-use outcomes of widely used socioeconomic scenarios. Accounting for differentiated social impacts in model-based conservation and restoration planning and global scale scenario assessment can help achieve a more inclusive transition to sustainability as well as reduce barriers to meaningful change.

Effect of altered human exposome on the skin and mucosal epithelial barrier integrity

Pollution in the world and exposure of humans and nature to toxic substances is continuously worsening at a rapid pace. In the last 60 years, human and domestic animal health has been challenged by continuous exposure to toxic substances and pollutants because of uncontrolled growth, modernization, and industrialization. More than 350,000 new chemicals have been introduced to our lives, mostly without any reasonable control of their health effects and toxicity. A plethora of studies show exposure to these harmful substances during this period with their implications on the skin and mucosal epithelial barrier and increasing prevalence of allergic and autoimmune diseases in the context of the "epithelial barrier hypothesis". Exposure to these substances causes an epithelial injury with peri-epithelial inflammation, microbial dysbiosis and bacterial translocation to sub-epithelial areas, and immune response to dysbiotic bacteria. Here, we provide scientific evidence on the altered human exposome and its impact on epithelial barriers.

Acute and chronic impacts of heat stress on planetary health

Heat waves are increasing in intensity, frequency, and duration causing significant heat stress in all living organisms. Heat stress has multiple negative effects on plants affecting photosynthesis, respiration, growth, development, and reproduction. It also impacts animals leading to physiological and behavioral alterations, such as reduced caloric intake, increased water intake, and decreased reproduction and growth. In humans, epidemiological studies have shown that heat waves are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There are many biological effects of heat stress (structural changes, enzyme function disruption, damage through reactive oxygen or nitrogen species). While plants and animals can mitigate some of these effects through adaptive mechanisms such as the generation of heat shock proteins, antioxidants, stress granules, and others, these mechanisms may likely be inadequate with further global warming. This review summarizes the effects of heat stress on plants and animals and the adaptative mechanisms that have evolved to counteract this stress.

Klimawandel und Allergien

Die Klimakrise stellt eine große Herausforderung für die menschliche Gesundheit sowie das Gesundheitssystem dar und droht, den medizinischen Fortschritt der letzten Jahrzehnte zu gefährden. In der Bewältigung des Klimawandels könnte jedoch auch die größte Chance für die globale Gesundheit im 21. Jahrhundert liegen.

Die Klimakrise und ihre Folgen, wie steigende Temperaturen, Waldbrände, Überschwemmungen, Dürren, Veränderungen in der Qualität und Quantität von Nahrungsmitteln und des Wassers wirken sich direkt und indirekt auf die physische und psychische Gesundheit des Menschen aus. Intensivere und häufigere Hitzewellen und die abnehmende Luftqualität erhöhen nachweislich die Gesamtmortalität, insbesondere bei den am meisten vulnerablen Personen. Die Klimaerwärmung verändert die bestehenden Ökosysteme und begünstigt biologische Invasionen von Arten, die Wärme und Trockenheit besser tolerieren. Die Erregerprofile verändern sich, die Übertragung und Verbreitung von durch Vektoren übertragene Krankheiten nehmen zu. Durch die Ausbreitung von Neophyten in Europa, wie beispielsweise der Ambrosiapflanze, entstehen neue Pollenquellen, die die Allergenexposition für Allergiker*innen erhöhen. Darüber hinaus verändert die insgesamt mildere Witterung, gerade in Kombination mit der Luftverschmutzung und einem erhöhten CO₂-Gehalt, die Produktion und Allergenität von Pollen. Das Phänomen Thunderstorm-Asthma tritt zudem häufiger auf. Angesichts der durch den Klimawandel zunehmenden Prävalenz von allergischen Erkrankungen ist eine frühzeitige kausale immunmodulierende Therapie umso wichtiger.

Im Rahmen einer Klimasprechstunde können Patient*innen individuell bezüglich einer Klimaadaption und -resilienz und der Vorteile einer CO₂-Reduzierung beraten werden - für die eigene und die planetare Gesundheit. Fast 5 % aller Treibhausgasemissionen in Europa stammen aus dem Gesundheitssektor. Er hat damit eine zentrale Verantwortung für eine klimaneutrale und nachhaltige Transformation.

Zitierweise: Luschkova D, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Ludwig A. Climate change and allergies. Allergo J Int 2022;31:114-20

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-022-00212-x

Comparison of Plate Waste between Vegetarian and Meat-Containing Meals in a Hospital Setting: Environmental and Nutritional Considerations

Vegetarian diets can satisfy nutritional requirements and have lower environmental impacts than those containing meat. However, fruits and vegetables are wasted at higher rates than meat. Reducing both food waste (FW) and the environmental impacts associated with food production is an important sustainability goal. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine potential tradeoffs between vegetarian meals’ lower impacts but potentially higher FW compared to meat-containing meals. To examine this, seven consecutive days of plate FW data from Loma Linda University Medical Center (LLUMC) patients were collected and recorded from 471 meals. Mean total FW and associated greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) were higher among meat-containing meals (293 g/plate, 604 g CO2-eq/plate) than vegetarian meals (259 g/plate, 357 g CO2-eq/plate) by 34 g (p = 0.05) and 240 g CO2-eq (p < 0.001), respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in both FW and associated GHGE across major food categories, except fruit, when comparing vegetarian and meat-containing meals. Overall, vegetarian meals were preferable to meat-containing meals served at LLUMC both in terms of minimizing FW and lowering environmental impacts. Other institutions serving vegetarian meal options could expect similar advantages, especially in reduced GHGE due to the high CO2 embodied in meat.

[Not Available]

Die Klimakrise stellt eine große Herausforderung für die menschliche Gesundheit sowie das Gesundheitssystem dar und droht, den medizinischen Fortschritt der letzten Jahrzehnte zu gefährden. In der Bewältigung des Klimawandels könnte jedoch auch die größte Chance für die globale Gesundheit im 21. Jahrhundert liegen.