Phase 3 randomised study of avatrombopag, a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia

Tapering and Sustained Remission of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-RAs): Is it Time for Paediatric ITP?

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-Ras; romiplostim/eltrombopag/avatrombopag) have demonstrated high efficacy rates (59-88%) and a good safety profile in clinical trials with adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Similar efficacy and safety results have been observed with romiplostim and eltrombopag in paediatric cohorts. Continuous treatment with TPO-RAs has shown durable responses with long-term use, up to 3 years. The effect of TPO-RAs was generally considered transient, as platelet counts tended to drop to baseline values after a short period of time (about 2 weeks), unless treatment was maintained. Several groups have reported successful discontinuation of TPO-RAs without the need for concomitant treatments. This is referred to as sustained remission off treatment (SROT). Both short- and medium-term treatment with TPO-RAs may reduce costs to our healthcare systems and, more importantly, may reduce the potential side effects that may be associated with continuous TPO-RA treatment. The issue of tapering and discontinuation of TPO-RAs in paediatric patients with ITP has received little attention to date. Given that paediatric ITP has much higher rates of spontaneous remission than ITP in adults, we consider that the possibility of SROT of TPO-RAs in paediatric patients with ITP is a neglected but very relevant issue in this subtype of the disease.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Complicated by Prolonged Thrombocytopenia: A Comprehensive Review

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a well-established procedure that has become a therapeutic mainstay for various hematological conditions. Prolonged thrombocytopenia following HCT is associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality, yet no universally recognized treatment protocol exists for such a complication. First-generation thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) agonists as well as second-generation agents are known for their role in enhancing platelet production, and their use is expanding across various thrombocytopenic conditions. Therefore, we conducted this comprehensive review of the literature to provide an updated evaluation of the use of TpoR agonists and explore their efficacy and safety in the treatment of extended post-HCT thrombocytopenia. The literature search was conducted using PubMed database from 1996 through December 2023, using a predefined strategy with medical subject headings terms. We identified 64 reports on the utility of TpoR agonists, five of them were randomized controlled trials and the rest were retrospective observational studies and case series, with a total number of 1730 patients. Second-generation TpoR agonists appear more convenient than subcutaneous recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTpo) as they can be orally administered and exhibit similar efficacy in platelet recovery, as indicated by recent trial results. Among these agents, avatrombopag, unlike eltrombopag, does not require any dietary restrictions, which could be more favorable for patients. However, eltrombopag remains the most extensively studied agent. TpoR agonists had promising effects in the treatment of post-HCT thrombocytopenia with a good safety profile so far, highlighting the potential benefit of their use.

The immune thrombocytopenia paradox: Should we be concerned about thrombosis in ITP?

Despite the predisposition to bleeding, patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may also have an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, which can contribute to significant morbidity. The risk of thrombosis increases with age and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. This narrative review explores the multifactorial nature of thrombosis in ITP, focusing on new pathological mechanisms, emerging evidence on the association between established treatments and thrombotic risk, the role of novel treatment approaches, and the challenges in assessing the balance between bleeding and thrombosis in ITP. The review also explores the challenges in managing acute thrombotic events in ITP, since the platelet count does not always reliably predict either the risk of bleeding or thrombosis and antithrombotic strategies lack specific guidelines for ITP. Notably, second-line therapeutic options, such as splenectomy and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), exhibit an increased risk of thrombosis especially in older individuals or those with multiple thrombotic risk factors or previous thrombosis, emphasizing the importance of careful risk assessment before treatment selection. In this context, it is important to consider second-line therapies such as rituximab and other immunosuppressive agents, dapsone and fostamatinib, which are not associated with increased thrombotic risk. In particular, fostamatinib, an oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has promisingly low thrombotic risk. During the current era of the emergence of several novel ITP therapies that do not pose additional risks for thrombosis, it is critical to outline evidence-based strategies for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in ITP patients.

Efficacy and safety of sovleplenib (HMPL-523) in adult patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia in China (ESLIM-01): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Sovleplenib, a novel spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor, showed promising safety and activity in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia in a phase 1b/2 trial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sovleplenib in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (ESLIM-01) was done in 34 clinical centres in China. Eligible patients, aged 18-75 years, had chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and received one or more previous treatments. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral sovleplenib or placebo, 300 mg once daily, for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline platelet counts, previous splenectomy, and concomitant treatment for anti-immune thrombocytopenia at baseline. The primary endpoint was durable response rate (proportion of patients with a platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L on at least four of six scheduled visits between weeks 14 and 24, not affected by rescue treatment) assessed by intention-to-treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05029635, and the extension, open-label phase is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 29, 2021, and Dec 31, 2022, 188 patients were randomly assigned to receive sovleplenib (n=126) or placebo (n=62). 124 (66%) were female, 64 (34%) were male, and all were of Asian ethnicity. Median previous lines of immune thrombocytopenia therapy were 4·0, and 134 (71%) of 188 patients had received previous thrombopoietin or thrombopoietin receptor agonist. The primary endpoint was met; durable response rate was 48% (61/126) with sovleplenib compared with zero with placebo (difference 48% [95% CI 40-57]; p<0·0001). The median time to response was 8 days with sovleplenib compared with 30 days with placebo. 125 (99%) of 126 patients in the sovleplenib group and 53 (85%) of 62 in the placebo group reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and most events were mild or moderate. Frequent TEAEs of grade 3 or higher for sovleplenib versus placebo were platelet count decreased (7% [9/126] vs 10% [6/62]), neutrophil count decreased (3% [4/126] vs 0% [0/62]), and hypertension (3% [4/126] vs 0% [0/62]). Incidences of serious TEAEs were 21% (26/126) in the sovleplenib group and 18% (11/62) in the placebo group. There were no deaths in the study.

INTERPRETATION

Sovleplenib showed a clinically meaningful sustained platelet response in patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia, with a tolerable safety profile and improvement in quality of life. Sovleplenib could be a potential treatment option for patients with immune thrombocytopenia who received one or more previous therapy.

FUNDING

HUTCHMED and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality.

Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia: Contextualization from a Historical Perspective

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by an isolated decrease in platelet count and an increased risk of bleeding. The pathogenesis is complex, affecting multiple components of the immune system and causing both peripheral destruction of platelets and inadequate production in the bone marrow. In this article, we review the treatment of ITP from a historical perspective, discussing first line and second line treatments, and management of refractory disease.

Data mining and safety analysis of avatrombopag: a retrospective pharmacovigilance study based on the US food and drug administration's adverse event reporting system

With its increasing use in the treatment of thrombocytopenia, avatrombopag's associated adverse events (AEs) pose a major challenge to its clinical application. This study aims to comprehensively study AEs associated with avatrombopag by using real-world evidence. We curated AE reports for avatrombopag from the first quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2023 in the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. AEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities of Preferred Terms and System Organ Classes. The reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item Gamma-Poisson Shrinker were used to investigate the relationship between avatrombopag and AE reports. Among 9,060,312 reported cases in the FAERS database, 1211 reports listed avatrombopag as "primary suspected" drug. Disproportionality analysis identified 44 preferred terms across 17 organ systems met the criteria for at least one of the four algorithms. The most commonly reported AEs were platelet count decreased (20.2%), headache (16.7%), platelet count increased (11.9%), platelet count abnormal (6.3%), contusion (2.7%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%), and deep vein thrombosis (2.1%). Unexpected AEs such as seasonal allergy, rhinorrhea, antiphospholipid syndrome, ear discomfort, and photopsia were also observed. Excluding the other serious outcomes, hospitalization (34.6%) was the most frequently reported serious outcome, followed by death (15.4%). Most reported AEs occurred within the first 2 days of initiating avatrombopag therapy, and the median onset time was 60 days. We identified new and unexpected AEs with clinical use of avatrombopag, and our results may provide valuable information for clinical monitoring and identifying risks associated with avatrombopag.

Efficacy and safety of avatrombopag in Chinese children with persistent and chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia: A multicentre observational retrospective study in China

Avatrombopag (AVA) is a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) that has been recently approved as a second-line therapy for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults; however, its safety and efficacy data in children are lacking. Here, we demonstrated the efficacy and safety of AVA as second-line therapy in children with ITP. A multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted in children with persistent or chronic ITP who did not respond to or relapsed from previous treatment and were treated with AVA for at least 12 weeks between August 2020 and December 2022. The outcomes were the responses (defined as achieving a platelet count ≥30 × 109/L, twofold increase in platelet count from baseline and absence of bleeding), including rapid response within 4 weeks, sustained response at weeks 12 and 24, bleeding control and adverse events (AEs). Thirty-four (18 males) patients with a mean age of 6.3 (range: 1.9-15.3) years were enrolled. The median number of previous treatment types was four (range: 1-6), and 41.2% patients switched from other TPO-RAs. Within 4 weeks, overall response (OR) was achieved in 79.4% patients and complete response (CR, defined as a platelet count ≥100 × 109/L and the absence of bleeding) in 67.7% patients with a median response time of 7 (range: 1-27) days. At 12 weeks, OR was achieved in 88.2%, CR in 76.5% and sustained response in 44% of patients. At 24 weeks, 22/34 (64.7%) patients who achieved a response and were followed up for 24 weeks were evaluated; 12/22 (54.55%) achieved a sustained response. During AVA therapy, median platelet counts increased by week 1 and were maintained throughout the treatment period. The proportion of patients with grade 1-3 bleeding decreased from 52.95% at baseline to 2.94% at 12 weeks, while concomitant ITP medications decreased from 36.47% at baseline to 8.82% at 12 weeks, with only 9 (26.47%) patients receiving rescue therapy 23 times within 12 weeks. There were 61.8% patients with 59 AEs: 29.8% with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1 and the rest with grade 2. These findings show that AVA could achieve a rapid and sustained response in children with persistent or chronic ITP as a second-line treatment, with good clinical bleeding control and reduction of concomitant ITP therapy, without significant AEs.

A practical guide to the management of immune thrombocytopenia co-existing with acute coronary syndrome

Introduction

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) management with co-existing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains challenging as it requires a clinically relevant balance between the risk and outcomes of thrombosis and the risk of bleeding. However, the literature evaluating the treatment approaches in this high-risk population is scarce.

Methods and Results

In this review, we aimed to summarize the available literature on the safety of ITP first- and second-line therapies to provide a practical guide on the management of ITP co-existing with ACS. We recommend holding antithrombotic therapy, including antiplatelet agents and anticoagulation, in severe thrombocytopenia with a platelet count < 30 × 109/L and using a single antiplatelet agent when the platelet count falls between 30 and 50 × 109/L. We provide a stepwise approach according to platelet count and response to initial therapy, starting with corticosteroids, with or without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) with a dose limit of 35 g, followed by thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) to a target platelet count of 200 × 109/L and then rituximab.

Conclusion

Our review may serve as a practical guide for clinicians in the management of ITP co-existing with ACS.

Long-term treatment with rilzabrutinib in patients with immune thrombocytopenia

ABSTRACT

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease associated with autoantibody-mediated platelet destruction and impaired platelet production, resulting in thrombocytopenia and a predisposition to bleeding. The ongoing, global phase 1/2 study showed that rilzabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically developed to treat autoimmune disorders, could be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for ITP. Clinical activity, durability of response, and safety were evaluated in 16 responding patients who continued rilzabrutinib 400 mg twice daily in the long-term extension (LTE) study. At LTE entry, the median platelet count was 87 × 109/L in all patients, 68 × 109/L in those who had rilzabrutinib monotherapy (n = 5), and 156 × 109/L in patients who received concomitant ITP medication (thrombopoietin-receptor agonists and/or corticosteroids, n = 11). At a median duration of treatment of 478 days (range, 303-764), 11 of 16 patients (69%) continued to receive rilzabrutinib. A platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L was reported in 93% of patients for more than half of their monthly visits. The median percentage of LTE weeks with platelet counts ≥30 × 109/L and ≥50 × 109/L was 100% and 88%, respectively. Five patients discontinued concomitant ITP therapy and maintained median platelet counts of 106 × 109/L at 3 to 6 months after stopping concomitant ITP therapy. Adverse events related to treatment were grade 1 or 2 and transient, with no bleeding, thrombotic, or serious adverse events. With continued rilzabrutinib treatment in the LTE, platelet responses were durable and stable over time with no new safety signals. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03395210 and www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu as EudraCT 2017-004012-19.

Risk-based and individualised management of bleeding and thrombotic events in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Although bleeding is one of the main symptoms of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), risk factors for bleeding have yet to be fully established. Low platelet count (PC; <20-30 × 109 /L) is generally indicative of increased risk of bleeding. However, PC and bleeding events cannot be fully correlated; many other patient- and disease-related factors are thought to contribute to increased bleeding risk. Furthermore, even though ITP patients have thrombocytopenia and are at increased risk of bleeding, ITP also carries higher risk of thrombotic events. Factors like older age and certain ITP treatments are associated with increased thrombotic risk. Women's health in ITP requires particular attention concerning haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Management of bleeding/thrombotic risk, and eventually antithrombotic therapies in ITP patients, should be based on individual risk profiles, using a tailored, patient-centric approach. Currently, evidence-based recommendations and validated tools are lacking to support decision-making and help clinicians weigh risk of bleeding against thrombosis. Moreover, evidence is lacking about optimal PC for achieving haemostasis in invasive procedures settings. Further research is needed to fully define risk factors for each event, enabling development of comprehensive risk stratification approaches. This review discusses risk-based and individualised management of bleeding and thrombosis risk in adults with primary ITP.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonist and rituximab combination therapy in patients with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia

The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of this therapy in patients with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia. It is crucial to develop alternative treatment methods for this patient group in order to achieve better response. This combination therapy combines two different mechanisms of action, which is promising in terms of targeting pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia. We conducted a retrospective study, which included all patients who were diagnosed with refractory primary immune thrombocytopenia and received TPO-RA and rituximab at the General Hematology Department, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz, Poland. We assessed the response, time to response and treatment-free remission (TFR). After 1 month of treatment, the complete response (CR1, PLT >100 g/l) was achieved in 62.5% patients, and response (R1, PLT >30 g/l) was achieved in 62.5% patients. The median PLT was 175 × 10 9 /l. Within 1 month of treatment, 87.5% of patients achieved TFR. Adequately, after 6 months, CR6 and R6 was 62.5 and 75%. The median PLT was 182 × 10 9 /l. Treatment-free remission 6 months after completion was in 50% of patients. The study group achieved response to treatment, which suggests that combination of TPO-RA and rituximab is effective and relatively well tolerated. Prospective study on larger group of patients is needed to better evaluate the efficiency and safety of this treatment.

Eltrombopag improves platelet engraftment after haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: Results of a Phase II study

Slow platelet recovery frequently occurs after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with bone marrow graft and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Improved platelet recovery may reduce the need for transfusions and improve outcomes. We investigated the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, at enhancing platelet recovery post-haplo-HSCT. The prospective study included patients ≥18 years of age who received haplo-HSCT with bone marrow graft and PCy. Patients received eltrombopag 300 mg/day starting on Day +5. The primary objective was to estimate platelet engraftment (>50 000/μL by Day 60). In a post hoc analysis, they were compared to a contemporary matched control group who did not receive eltrombopag. One hundred ten patients were included in the analysis (30 eltrombopag and 80 control). Seventy-three percent and 50% of patients in the eltrombopag group and control group, respectively, attained >50 000/μL platelet count by Day 60 (p = .043). No eltrombopag-related grade ≥4 adverse events were observed. Median time to platelet recovery (>20 000/μL) was 29 days with eltrombopag and 31 days for controls (p = .022), while its cumulative incidence was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78%-100%) with eltrombopag versus 67.5% (95% CI: 57%-78%) for controls (p = .014). Number of platelet transfusions received, overall survival, progression-free survival, GVHD rate, relapse rate, and non-relapse mortality were similar between groups. Overall, eltrombopag is safe and improves platelet recovery in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT with bone marrow graft and PCy.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists use and risk of thrombotic events in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have a role in second-line immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) treatment, binding to and activating thrombopoietin receptors on megakaryocyte membranes in the bone marrow. This promotes megakaryocyte maturation and increases platelet production. Despite a 2-6% incidence of thrombotic events during TPO-RA treatment, it remains uncertain whether TPO-RAs elevate thrombosis rates. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted using the relevant search criteria. To assess the risk of bias, the included studies were assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2.0, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1. A total of 1,698 patients with ITP were included from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There were 26 thromboembolic events in the TPO-RAs group and 4 in the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of thrombotic events between the two groups [odds ratio (OR)=1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-4.00, P=0.18], even if the duration of treatment was >12 weeks (OR=2.46, 95% CI: 0.81-7.43, P=0.11). Subgroup analysis showed that none of the four drugs significantly increased the incidence of thrombotic events (romiplostim: OR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.14-6.13, P=0.93; eltrombopag: OR=2.32, 95% CI: 0.64-8.47, P=0.20; avatrombopag: OR=4.15, 95% CI: 0.20-85.23, P=0.36; and hetrombopag: OR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.03-18.76, P=0.87). There was also no significant difference in the results of the double-blinded placebo-controlled RCTs (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.41-3.58, P=0.73). Compared to patients with ITP who did not receive TPO-RA treatment, those receiving TPO-RA treatment did not exhibit a significantly increased risk of thrombotic events.

Translating mechanisms into therapeutic strategies for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Lessons from clinical trials

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder that causes a significant reduction in peripheral blood platelet count. Fortunately, due to an increased understanding of ITP, there have been significant improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. Over the past decade, there have been a variety of proven therapeutic options available for ITP patients, including intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), Rituximab, corticosteroids, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). Although the effectiveness of current therapies in treating more than two-thirds of patients, still some patients do not respond well to conventional therapies or fail to achieve long-term remission. Recently, a significant advancement has been made in identifying various mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of ITP, leading to the development of novel treatments targeting these pathways. It seems that new agents that target plasma cells, Bruton tyrosine kinase, FcRn, platelet desialylation, splenic tyrosine kinase, and classical complement pathways are opening new ways to treat ITP. In this study, we reviewed the pathophysiology of ITP and summarized updates in this population's management and treatment options. We also took a closer look at the 315 ongoing trials to investigate their progress status and compare the effectiveness of interventions. May our comprehensive view of ongoing clinical trials serve as a guiding beacon, illuminating the path towards future trials of different drugs in the treatment of ITP patients.

How I treat thrombocytopenia in pregnancy

ABSTRACT

Thrombocytopenia is a common hematologic abnormality in pregnancy, encountered in ∼10% of pregnancies. There are many possible causes, ranging from benign conditions that do not require intervention to life-threatening disorders necessitating urgent recognition and treatment. Although thrombocytopenia may be an inherited condition or predate pregnancy, most commonly it is a new diagnosis. Identifying the responsible mechanism and predicting its course is made challenging by the tremendous overlap of clinical features and laboratory data between normal pregnancy and the many potential causes of thrombocytopenia. Multidisciplinary collaboration between hematology, obstetrics, and anesthesia and shared decision-making with the involved patient is encouraged to enhance diagnostic clarity and develop an optimized treatment regimen, with careful consideration of management of labor and delivery and the potential fetal impact of maternal thrombocytopenia and any proposed therapeutic intervention. In this review, we outline a diagnostic approach to pregnant patients with thrombocytopenia, highlighting the subtle differences in presentation, physical examination, clinical course, and laboratory abnormalities that can be applied to focus the differential. Four clinical scenarios are presented to highlight the pathophysiology and treatment of the most common causes of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: gestational thrombocytopenia, preeclampsia, and immune thrombocytopenia.

Avatrombopag for adults with early versus chronic immune thrombocytopenia

Avatrombopag is a newer thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) currently approved to treat chronic ITP (duration >12 months). No studies have yet evaluated the safety and effectiveness of avatrombopag in newly diagnosed ITP (duration <3 months) or persistent ITP (duration 3-12 months), and so its use in these populations is presently off-label worldwide. We hypothesize that avatrombopag has similar safety and effectiveness irrespective of ITP disease phase. To evaluate this, we performed a multicenter observational cohort study of adults with ITP treated with avatrombopag, comparing patient outcomes by disease phase (newly diagnosed/persistent versus chronic). Seventy-five patients were included, 23 with newly diagnosed/persistent ITP (17.7 patient-years of avatrombopag treatment) and 52 with chronic ITP (65.3 patient-years of avatrombopag treatment). On avatrombopag, 91% of newly diagnosed/persistent patients versus 96% of chronic patients (p = .58) achieved a platelet response (≥50 × 109 /L) and 86% versus 81% of patients (p = .78) achieved a complete response (≥100 × 109 /L). Median platelet counts on avatrombopag were similar between the two groups (165 × 109 /L vs. 129 × 109 /L, p = .57). Response durability was high and similar in both groups. No patients in the newly diagnosed/persistent group had a major bleeding event, thromboembolic event or avatrombopag discontinuation for adverse events, compared with 4, 1, and 2, respectively, in the chronic group. Thrombocytosis (platelets ≥400 × 109 /L) incidence was similar in the two groups. No other drug-related adverse events occurred in either group. Avatrombopag was safe and effective in patients with newly diagnosed and persistent ITP, with outcomes numerically, statistically, and clinically similar to patients receiving avatrombopag for chronic ITP.

Avatrombopag for the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia and Periprocedural Thrombocytopenia Associated With Chronic Liver Disease

Objective: To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, dosing and administration, and place in therapy of avatrombopag for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia and chronic liver disease-associated thrombocytopenia. Summary: Avatrombopag is an orally administered thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia and is the first oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for the treatment of perioperative thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease in adults. The efficacy and safety of avatrombopag has been demonstrated in a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase III study in the setting of immune thrombocytopenia and in 2 identically designed, multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials in the setting of thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease. The most common adverse events reported in the clinical trials were headache, fatigue, and gastrointestinal toxicities. The incidence of bleeding events was comparable between the avatrombopag and placebo treatment groups in each study. Avatrombopag has not been shown to be associated with hepatoxicity and does not require food restriction like the other oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist for immune thrombocytopenia, eltrombopag. Also, unlike eltrombopag for immune thrombocytopenia, it can be dosed less frequently than once daily. Conclusion: Avatrombopag offers another safe and effective oral option for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia without food restrictions and an alternative, transfusion-sparing option for thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease patients undergoing surgery.

How I diagnose and treat thrombocytopenia in geriatric patients

ABSTRACT

Thrombocytopenia in older individuals is a common but diagnostically challenging condition that has variable clinical impact to those who are affected. Diagnostic approach requires evaluation of the preexisting clinical conditions, detailed review of medications, and assessment for disorders that warrant urgent treatment. In this article, we describe a systematic approach to diagnosis of thrombocytopenia and present a schematic review for management strategies. Three clinical scenarios are presented that are relevant for their prevalence and management challenges in an older adult population. The first scenario addresses primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and reviews different treatment options. The second one addresses complications of thrombocytopenia in management of the myelodysplastic syndrome. The last one reviews diagnostic challenges of drug-induced ITP.

Optimal management of chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombopoietin receptor agonists

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common complication of antineoplastic therapy, resulting in antineoplastic therapy dose reductions, treatment delays, treatment discontinuation, and morbid bleeding events. Despite several decades of research into thrombopoietic growth factors in CIT, there are presently no available U.S. FDA- or EMA-approved agents to treat CIT. However, a respectable body of evidence has been published evaluating the thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for the management and prevention of CIT in patients with solid tumors, and critical studies are ongoing with the TPO-RAs romiplostim and avatrombopag. When employed in the appropriate patient population and used properly, TPO-RAs can successfully and safely manage CIT for extended periods of time with minimal apparent risks. This comprehensive review discusses the evidence for TPO-RAs in CIT in patients with solid tumors, provides detailed guidance for their use in the clinic, and discusses ongoing essential clinical trials in management of CIT.

The many facets of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia: Principles of immunobiology and immunotherapy

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare autoimmune condition, due to peripheral platelet destruction through antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity, and megakaryopoiesis alteration. This condition may be idiopathic or triggered by drugs, vaccines, infections, cancers, autoimmune disorders and systemic diseases. Recent advances in our understanding of ITP immunobiology support the idea that other forms of thrombocytopenia, for instance, occurring after immunotherapy or cellular therapies, may share a common pathophysiology with possible therapeutic implications. If a decent pipeline of old and new agents is currently deployed for classical ITP, in other more complex immune-mediated thrombocytopenic disorders, clinical management is less harmonized and would deserve further prospective investigations. Here, we seek to provide a fresh overview of pathophysiology and current therapeutical algorithms for adult patients affected by this disorder with specific insights into poorly codified scenarios, including refractory ITP and post-immunotherapy/cellular therapy immune-mediated thrombocytopenia.

Addressing thrombosis concerns in immune thrombocytopenia: the role of fostamatinib in immune thrombocytopenia management

INTRODUCTION

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), a disease that commonly presents with an increased risk of bleeding, can also paradoxically produce an increased risk of thromboembolic events. The risk of thromboembolism can be associated with patient-related factors (e.g. co-morbidities, age and history of thrombosis), disease-related factors (e.g. a greater proportion of younger, more reactive platelets, and the presence of microparticles and pro-inflammatory cytokines) and treatment-related factors (e.g. splenectomy, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, and IVIg).

AREAS COVERED

Aspects of the pathophysiology of ITP and the effects of treatment are discussed with emphasis on individualizing treatment based on the patient's thromboembolic risk, treatment options and preferences.

EXPERT OPINION

An increased understanding of the pathophysiology of ITP has led to the development of new agents such as fostamatinib, a spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Further research into the factors contributing to the risks for bleeding and thromboembolic events can contribute to the development of more specific therapies for ITP and allow greater individualization of therapy based on each patient's medical history and clinical status.

Role of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a significant challenge in cancer treatment, often leading to dose reductions and reduced number of cycles. The limited effectiveness of platelet transfusions in managing CIT highlights the need for alternative treatments. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA), including romiplostim, eltrombopag and avatrombopag, have shown potential in increasing platelet counts in CIT patients, necessitating a comprehensive analysis of their efficacy.

METHODS

This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, searching Ovid databases up to 5 October 2023. The primary metric of interest was platelet count changes post-TPO-RA administration in CIT patients.

RESULTS

From the initial 867 studies obtained, 7 studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. The analysis included 348 patients. A significant association was found between TPO-RA administration and platelet count increase, with a combined-effect increase of 69.52 ± 2.24 × 109/l. Subgroup analysis based on Romiplostim use suggested an increase of approximately 70.11 ± 39.07 × 109/l, while non-Romiplostim TPO-RAs showcased an increase of about 68.09 ± 82.58 × 109/l.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of TPO-RAs in managing CIT. Further research comparing platelet increases across standardised TPO-RA regimens is recommended to refine treatment strategies. This analysis provides valuable insights for clinicians in tailoring CIT treatment using TPO-RAs.

Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a narrative review and an approach for managing patients fasting intermittently

Introduction

Thrombopoietin-receptor agonist (TPO-RAs) currently represent the state of art for treating immune thrombocytopenia. Their different molecular structures contribute to the difference in their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the current TPO-RAs approved for primary immune thrombocytopenia (romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag) and the effect of intermittent fasting in adult patients receiving TPO-RAs.

Areas covered

Literature was searched with no limits on date or language, using various combinations of keywords. Data on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of TPO-RAs and the effect of intermittent fasting were summarized.

Expert opinion

Switching between TPO-RAs is a useful strategy to tackle some associated limitations. Romiplostim and avatrombopag have an advantage over eltrombopag as they do not require any dietary restrictions. In cases where romiplostim and avatrombopag are unavailable, patients should be educated on the appropriate administration, possible interactions, and dietary restrictions before initiating eltrombopag.

Avatrombopag-induced lactic acidosis in a patient with severe thrombocytopenia

A woman in her 60s was admitted for refractory thrombocytopenia, initially presumed to be from immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). She was treated with the thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) avatrombopag, as well as prophylactic ciprofloxacin and fluconazole for neutropenia. She developed an anion gap metabolic acidosis with a significantly elevated lactate level peaking at 7.5 mmol/L. Other causes of lactic acidosis including hypovolaemia, sepsis, ischaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis were ruled out. Avatrombopag was discontinued, with quick resolution of the lactic acidosis. Fluconazole and ciprofloxacin were found to inhibit the metabolism of avatrombopag and were also discontinued. Worsening thrombocytopenia prompted a rechallenge with increased dose avatrombopag and severe lactic acidosis again developed, with subsequent quick resolution after drug discontinuation. We conclude that a dose-dependent lactic acidosis occurred with avatrombopag in this case. While other TPO-RAs including eltrombopag have been associated with lactic acidosis, to our knowledge, this is the first report of avatrombopag-induced lactic acidosis.

Thrombopoietin level predicts the response to avatrombopag treatment for persistent thrombocytopenia after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Persistent thrombocytopenia (PT) has an unsatisfactory response to therapy after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of avatrombopag treatment in 69 patients with PT following haplo-HSCT and assessed whether baseline thrombopoietin (TPO) levels could predict treatment response. Overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) were defined as increased platelet levels to over 20 × 109/L or 50 × 109/L independent of platelet transfusion during or within 7 days of the end of avatrombopag treatment, respectively. The incidences of OR and CR were 72.5% and 58.0%, with a median of 11 and 29 days to OR and CR, respectively. ROC analysis suggested that the optimally discriminant baseline TPO level threshold for both OR and CR to avatrombopag was ≤ 1714 pg/mL. In multivariate analysis, a lower baseline TPO level (P = 0.005) was a significant independent factor of response to avatrombopag. For patients resistant to other TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), 9/16 (56.3%) exhibited a response after switching to avatrombopag. Avatrombopag was well tolerated, and responders achieved improved overall survival (79.0% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.001). In conclusion, avatrombopag is a potential safe and effective treatment for PT after haplo-HSCT, and lower baseline TPO levels predicted a better response.

Avatrombopag, a promising novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist for refractory/relapsed/intolerant non-severe aplastic anemia: a phase 2 single-arm clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic options for thrombocytopenia in non-severe aplastic anaemia (NSAA) are limited. Avatrombopag (AVA) is prescribed for thrombocytopenic diseases but not for NSAA.

METHODS

Herein, we conducted a phase 2, non-randomized, single-arm trial to explore the efficacy and safety of AVA in refractory/relapsed/intolerant NSAA. AVA dose was initiated at 20 mg/d and titrated to a maximum of 60 mg/d. The primary endpoint was the haematological response at 3 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR) at 3 months was 56% (14/25), with 12% (3/25) achieving a complete response (CR). At a median follow-up of 7 (3-10) months, the OR and CR rates were 52% and 20%, respectively. Responders had a shorter duration of diagnosis of AVA administration than non-responders (10 (6-80) vs 37 (6-480) months, p = 0.027) and belonged to the relapsed/intolerant NSAA type (71% vs 27%, p = 0.047); 44% (8/18) patients previously treated with eltrombopag before enrollment responded at 3 months, with an average prior eltrombopag dose of median 72.5 (50-100) mg/d and an average AVA dose for a response of median 43.5 (20-60) mg/d. 3-month ORR had no significant correlation with eltrombopag exposure (p = 0.09), prior eltrombopag length (R²=0.11), or cumulative eltrombopag dose (R²=0.30). Only one patient relapsed after stopping AVA for 1 month. No serious AVA-related side effects or clone evolution were detected.

CONCLUSION

AVA is effective and well-tolerated in NSAA patients who are refractory, relapsed, or intolerant to CsA/tacrolimus ± eltrombopag. Earlier treatment and relapsed/intolerant AA may show a better short-term response rate. More studies are needed to define the optimal dose and the long-term efficacy (NCT04728789).

Rilzabrutinib versus placebo in adults and adolescents with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia: LUNA 3 phase III study

Background

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by primarily autoantibody-mediated platelet destruction and impaired platelet production resulting in thrombocytopenia and an increased risk of bleeding. Other manifestations include increased risk of thrombosis and diminished quality of life. Current treatment approaches are directed toward lowering the rate of platelet destruction or stimulating platelet production to prevent bleeding. Rilzabrutinib is an oral, reversible, potent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor that was specifically designed to treat immune-mediated diseases and mediates its therapeutic effect through a dual mechanism of action: (1) inhibiting B-cell activation and (2) interrupting antibody-coated cell phagocytosis by Fc gamma receptor in spleen and liver. A 24-week dose-finding phase I/II study of rilzabrutinib in patients with ITP showed a 40% platelet response (⩾2 consecutive platelet counts of ⩾50 × 109/L and increase from baseline ⩾20 × 109/L without rescue medication use) and a well-tolerated safety profile with only grade 1/2 transient adverse events across dose levels.

Objectives

Assess the efficacy and safety of oral rilzabrutinib in adult and adolescent patients with persistent or chronic ITP.

Design

Rilzabrutinib 400 mg BID is being evaluated in the ongoing LUNA 3 multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

Methods and analysis

The primary endpoint is durable platelet response, defined as achieving platelet counts of ⩾50 × 109/L for at least two-thirds of ⩾8 available weekly scheduled platelet measurements during the last 12 weeks (including ⩾2 available measurements within the last 6 weeks) of the 24-week blinded treatment period in the absence of rescue therapy.

Ethics

Ethical guidelines and informed consent are followed.

Discussion

The LUNA 3 trial will further investigate rilzabrutinib's safety and efficacy in adult and adolescent patients, with the primary goal of addressing a major objective in treating patients with ITP: durability of platelet response.

Trail Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04562766: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04562766; EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT 2020-002063-60: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2020-002063-60.

Comparison of eltrombopag and avatrombopag in the treatment of refractory/relapsed aplastic anemia: a single-center retrospective study in China

Background

Eltrombopag (ELT), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA), has been approved for relapsed/refractory aplastic anemia (AA). However, data on avatrombopag (AVA), another TPO-RA, are limited, and the comparisons between the two TPO-RAs are lacking.

Objectives

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between ELT and AVA in relapsed/refractory AA patients.

Design

In this retrospective study, patients with relapsed/refractory AA who had been treated with ELT (N = 45) or AVA (N = 30) alone and had compatible baseline hematological parameters were compared.

Methods

Data from patients diagnosed with acquired AA were retrospectively collected. All patients were refractory/relapsed to standard immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for at least 6 months before ELT or AVA. Patients had to be treated with ELT or AVA alone for at least 6 months before evaluation if they did not respond. Baseline characteristics, overall response (OR), complete response (CR), relapse, adverse events, and factors that may affect efficacy were analyzed.

Results

Of the 75 patients enrolled, 45 received ELT and 30 received AVA. Patients with AVA had a higher percentage of abnormal liver or renal function than those with ELT (p = 0.036). No significant difference was found in the OR/CR rate in the first/second/third/sixth month between the two cohorts (p > 0.05). Patients treated with AVA had a shorter median time to response than those treated with ELT (p = 0.012) and had a higher platelet level in the second month (p = 0.041). AVA had fewer adverse events than ELT (p = 0.046). Under compatible follow-up time (p = 0.463), no difference was found between the ELT and AVA cohorts in relapse (p = 1.000) or clone evolution (p = 0.637). No predictive factors for OR and CR in the sixth month were found for either ELT or AVA.

Conclusion

With worse liver or renal function, AVA had a similar OR/CR rate but a shorter median time to response and fewer adverse events for patients with relapsed/refractory AA.

Thrombotic Complications in Immune Thrombocytopenia Patients Treated with Avatrombopag

Avatrombopag is a novel oral non-peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) that was approved by the FDA as a second-line therapy for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (cITP). Avatrombopag has shown promising results in regards to efficacy and tolerability, but to our knowledge, there are no reports of thrombotic complications associated with avatrombopag. We present two patients with chronic ITP who suffered thromboembolic events shortly after starting treatment with avatrombopag. The first case is that of a 30-year-old female with refractory cITP who failed multiple lines of ITP therapy and was hospitalized with an intracranial bleed. The patient eventually recovered after an emergent splenectomy but subsequently developed a right lower lobe pulmonary embolism three weeks after starting treatment with avatrombopag. The second case is that of a 58-year-old female with a prolonged history of ITP, and no prior history of peripheral vascular disease, who suffered from both arterial and venous thrombotic events four weeks after starting avatrombopag. Given the new arterial and venous thrombotic complications, avatrombopag was stopped. She was challenged with avatrombopag again and developed yet another thrombotic complication.

Primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): Time for a rethink

There are not many publications that provide a holistic view of the management of primary and secondary ITP as a whole, reflecting the similarities and differences between the two. Given the lack of major clinical trials, we believe that comprehensive reviews are much needed to guide the diagnosis and treatment of ITP today. Therefore, our review addresses the contemporary diagnosis and treatment of ITP in adult patients. With respect to primary ITP we especially focus on establishing the management of ITP based on the different and successive lines of treatment. Life-threatening situations, "bridge therapy" to surgery or invasive procedures and refractory ITP are also comprehensively reviewed here. Secondary ITP is studied according to its pathogenesis by establishing three major differential groups: Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Central Defects, Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Blocked Differentiation and Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Defective Peripheral Immune Response. Here we provide an up-to-date snapshot of the current diagnosis and treatment of ITP, including a special interest in addressing rare causes of this disease in our daily clinical practice. The target population of this review is adult patients only and the target audience is medical professionals.

Avatrombopag for adult chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia: a randomized phase 3 trial in China

Background

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder with decreased platelet counts and increased bleeding risk.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag, a second-generation oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, for the treatment of Chinese patients with chronic primary ITP.

Methods

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (CTR20210431) consisted of a 6-week double-blind core treatment phase followed by a 20-week, open-label extension phase. Chinese adults with chronic primary ITP for at least 12 months and a platelet count <30 × 109/L were randomized (2:1) to receive avatrombopag (initial dose of 20 mg/day) or matched placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with a platelet count ≥50 × 109/L at week 6 of the core treatment phase in absence of rescue therapy.

Results

In total, 74 patients were randomized (avatrombopag: N = 48; placebo: N = 26) between March 5, 2021, and August 6, 2021; all of whom entered the extension phase (72 received avatrombopag up to 26 weeks). At week 6 of the core study, the platelet response (≥50 x 109/L) rate was significantly higher in the avatrombopag group (77.1%; 95% CI, 62.7, 88.0) vs placebo (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.0, 25.1); the treatment difference was 69.4% (95% CI, 56.2, 86.3; P < .0001). During the 6-week core study, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 41 (85.4%) and 20 (76.9%) patients in the avatrombopag and placebo groups, respectively. The most common avatrombopag-related treatment-emergent adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (14/48 [29.2%]), increased platelet count (13/48 [27.1%]) and headache (7/48 [14.6%]).

Conclusion

Avatrombopag was efficacious and generally well tolerated in Chinese patients with chronic primary ITP, with comparable efficacy and safety to previous reports in Western patients.

Safety of non‑peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of short‑term double‑blind randomized clinical trials

The aim of the present study was to analyze the safety of non-peptide thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) treatment. All studies reporting adverse events (AEs) in relation to ITP treatment with eltrombopag, avatrombopag, and hetrombopag were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. RevMan 5.4.1 was used for meta-analysis, heterogeneity and bias analyses. A total of 1,078 patients from seven eligible studies were enrolled. In the enrolled clinical trials, the double-blind period was between 6 weeks and 6 months. The results revealed that the chances of any AEs [relative risk (RR)=1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-1.51; I²=78%; P=0.26], grade 3/4 AEs (RR=1.07; 95% CI, 0.63-1.80; I²=0%; P=0.81), elevated transaminase levels (RR=1.09; 95% CI, 0.68-1.74; I²=0%; P=0.72), thrombosis (RR=1.92; 95% CI, 0.55-6.66; I²=0%; P=0.31) and cataracts (RR=0.83; 95% CI, 0.38-1.83; I²=0%; P=0.65) were not significantly higher in patients with ITP that received non-peptide TPO-RAs compared with patients with ITP treated with a placebo. The present study indicated that non-peptide TPO-RAs were relatively safe for patients with ITP, at least within 6 months of administration.

Rituximab resistance in ITP and beyond

The pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is complex and encompasses innate and adaptive immune responses, as well as megakaryocyte dysfunction. Rituximab is administered in relapsed cases and has the added benefit of inducing treatment-free remission in over 50% of patients. Nevertheless, the responses to this therapy are not long-lasting, and resistance development is frequent. B cells, T cells, and plasma cells play a role in developing resistance. To overcome this resistance, targeting these pathways through splenectomy and novel therapies that target FcγR pathway, FcRn, complement, B cells, plasma cells, and T cells can be useful. This review will summarize the pathogenetic mechanisms implicated in rituximab resistance and examine the potential therapeutic interventions to overcome it. This review will explore the efficacy of established therapies, as well as novel therapeutic approaches and agents currently in development.

Avatrombopag treatment response in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: the REAL-AVA 1.0 study

Background

Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are used to treat immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), a disorder characterized by prolonged low platelet counts (PCs) that pose a risk of serious bleeding episodes. Avatrombopag (AVA) is the most recently approved TPO-RA for the treatment of chronic ITP. A high proportion of patients responded to AVA in clinical trials, and treatment was well-tolerated; however, limited real-world effectiveness data have been reported to date.

Objectives

To describe demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes following the initiation of AVA in patients with ITP in the United States.

Design

This is a retrospective study using administrative claims data from the Komodo Healthcare Map (1 February 2017 to 28 February 2022) linked with PC laboratory data.

Methods

Patients with ⩾1 diagnosis of ITP, ⩾1 paid prescription for AVA (index date), and ⩾1 month of pharmacy coverage after AVA initiation were selected. Baseline characteristics and follow-up steroid, immunosuppressant, and rescue medication use were described. The percentage of patients achieving clinically meaningful PC thresholds (⩾30 × 109/l) were assessed among patients with ⩾1 PC following AVA initiation and prior to AVA discontinuation/switch (effectiveness subgroup).

Results

A total of 205 patients met eligibility criteria and 49% reported TPO-RA use in the prior 6 months. Approximately 70% and 93% of patients did not require use of steroid or immunoglobulin rescue medication during follow-up, respectively. Among patients with concomitant steroid (n = 75) or immunosuppressant (n = 7) use at AVA initiation, 35% and 57% discontinued those treatments, respectively. Of the 21 patients in the effectiveness subgroup, 81% achieved clinically meaningful PC thresholds.

Conclusion

A high proportion of evaluable patients with ITP in this real-world study achieved clinically meaningful PCs, without requiring rescue medication during AVA treatment, with many able to discontinue baseline concomitant steroid or immunosuppressant utilization. Despite limited availability of PC data, these results are consistent with results from the AVA pivotal clinical trials.

Avatrombopag increased platelet count in a patient with chronic immune thrombocytopenia refractory to multiple lines of treatment

We present a case of a 30-year-old man suffering from chronic refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) from early childhood. The patient was treated with all the therapeutic methods available in Poland, without platelet response: corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, splenectomy, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, ciclosporin A, romiplostim, and eltrombopag. He continued to function persistently with deep thrombocytopenia, symptoms of hemorrhagic diathesis, and one episode of spontaneous subarachnoid bleeding. In April 2022, at the age of 29, the patient received avatrombopag. Within 4 weeks of starting avatrombopag 20 mg daily for 2 weeks and then 40 mg daily, he reached a platelet (PLT) count of 67 x 10 9 /l. In the next month, platelets fell below 30 x 10 9 /l, but subsequently the count increased to 47 x 10 9 /l, then to 52 x 10 9 /l, and remained stable. The symptoms of cutaneous hemorrhage diathesis have resolved completely since avatrombopag was introduced and did not reappear despite the decrease in PLT count.

Immune thrombocytopenia: a review on the pathogenetic role of immune cells

INTRODUCTION

Immune thrombocytopenia [ITP] is a common bleeding disorder with an isolated platelet count of less than 100 × 109/L.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant literature from 2003 to 2022 was retrieved and reviewed from the Google Scholar search engine and PubMed database. Antibodies produced by autoreactive B lymphocytes and the phagocytic function of macrophages are considered the most critical factors in platelet destruction. Also, macrophages present the antigen to T lymphocytes and activate them. Follicular helper T-cells [TFH] play a role in stimulating, differentiating, and activating autoreactive B cells, while cluster of differentiation [CD]-8+ T plays a role in platelet destruction through apoptosis. The classical pathway of the complement system also causes platelet destruction. By inhibiting platelet production, low levels of thrombopoietin and an immune response against megakaryocytes in the bone marrow worsen thrombocytopenia.

EXPERT OPINION

T-cell subset changes and an increase in activated autoreactive B cells, in addition to the function of components of the innate immune system [the complement system, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells], play a critical role in the pathogenesis of the ITP. Accurate detection of these changes may lead to developing new therapeutic strategies and identifying better prognostic/diagnostic factors.

Budget impact analysis for avatrombopag in the treatment of chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia in adult patients refractory to other treatments

Introduction: Primary immune thrombocytopenia is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by a decreased platelet count resulting in an increased risk of bleeding events and even life-threatening haemorrhages. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are the standard of care second-line therapy for adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. The first TPO-RAs approved and reimbursed in Italy, eltrombopag and romiplostim, while effective, pose some issues in terms of safety (e.g., hepatotoxicity) or general management (e.g., dietary restrictions). Avatrombopag, an effective and well-tolerated TPO-RA, was recently granted reimbursement. Methods: A 3-year (2023-2025) budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted to estimate its impact on the Italian National Health Service (NHS). Two scenarios were compared, of which one represents the current situation, without avatrombopag, and the other provides for an increasing market share of avatrombopag (up to 26.6%). Results: BIA shows that the increase in the use of avatrombopag correlates with savings for NHS: in the first year, saving would be €1,300,564, increasing to €2,774,210 in the third year, for a total of €6,083,231 over the 3-year period. The sensitivity analysis confirmed these savings in the scenario with avatrombopag. Conclusions: Based on this BIA, the introduction and reimbursement of avatrombopag is an efficient and advantageous choice for the Italian NHS.

Risk of thrombotic events in immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with thrombopoietic agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), which is a well-known hemorrhagic disorder characterized by low platelet counts, has been shown to be associated with the risk of thrombosis. Thrombopoietic agents (TAs) are extensively used as second-line treatments for ITP, effectively reducing the risk of hemorrhage. However, thrombosis, a potential adverse effect of TAs, raises clinical challenges.

METHODS

The MEDLINE(PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant studies, including both single-arm trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), without language restrictions.

RESULTS

A total of 17 RCTs comprising 2,105 patients and 29 single-arm trials comprising 3,227 patients were included. In the single-arm meta-analysis, the pooled rate of overall thrombotic events in ITP patients receiving TAs was 2.2% (95% CI 1.0% - 3.7%). In RCTs, a higher incidence of thrombosis (33/1425 vs. 4/680) and higher risk ratios (RR) of overall, arterial, and venous thrombotic events (1.73, 95% CI [0.88, 3.39], P = 0.113; RR 1.98, 95% CI [0.80, 4.92], P = 0.141; RR 1.06, 95% CI [0.46, 2.41], P = 0.895, respectively) were observed in the TAs group than in the control group, although the differences were not significant. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that hetrombopag was the only TA with no increased thrombotic risk (rate 0.3% 95% CI [0.0 - 1.5%]; RR 0.76, 95% CI [0.03, 18.41], P = 0.864) compared to eltrombopag, avatrombopag, romiplostim, and rhTPO. Subgroup analyses also revealed that ITP patients with advanced age (3.7% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.132) or with a thrombotic history (3.0% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.257), and patients who received TAs therapy for a long duration (4.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001) had an increased risk of thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest ITP patients treated with TAs have a nonsignificantly higher risk of overall, arterial, and venous thrombotic events. Furthermore, hetrombopag is the recommended TA to avoid thrombophilia. Patients receiving long-term TAs, as well as elderly ITP patients or those with a history of thrombosis, face an increased thrombotic risk. In general, clinicians should consider potential thrombotic risks, address underlying risk factors, and ensure ongoing monitoring and follow-up when treating ITP patients with TAs.

Outcomes of switching to avatrombopag following treatment failure with eltrombopag in paediatric immune thrombocytopenia: A real-world study in China

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia and a haemorrhagic risk. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are highly effective for ITP and are widely used to treat patients with steroid treatment failure or dependency. However, although treatment response to TPO-RAs may differ according to the type, the potential impact of switching from eltrombopag (ELT) to avatrombopag (AVA) with respect to efficacy or tolerance in children remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of switching from ELT to AVA in paediatric patients with ITP. We retrospectively evaluated children with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (cITP) switched from ELT to AVA owing to treatment failure at the Hematology-Oncology Center of Beijing Children's Hospital between July 2021 and May 2022. Overall, 11 children (seven and four boys and girls respectively) with a median age of 8.3 (range: 3.8-15.3) years were included. The overall response and complete response (platelet [PLT] count ≥100 × 10⁹ /L) rates during AVA treatment were 81.8% (9/11) and 54.6% (6/11) respectively. The median PLT count was significantly increased from ELT to AVA (7 [range: 2-33] × 10⁹ /L vs. 74 [15-387] × 10⁹ /L; p = 0.007). The median time to PLT count ≥30 × 10⁹ /L was 18 (range: 3-120) days. Overall, 7/11 patients (63.6%) used concomitant medications, and concomitant medication use was gradually discontinued within 3-6 months after AVA initiation. In conclusion, AVA after ELT is effective in the heavily pretreated paediatric cITP population, with high response rates even in those with an inadequate response to a prior TPO-RA.

All-trans retinoic acid added to treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) application is a novel treatment approach for primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ATRA in the treatment of ITP. The databases of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China National Knowledge Internet were searched on August 5, 2022, to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Five observational studies and four RCTs from China were included, and 760 Chinese patients were analyzed. In the five observational studies, the pooled overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) were 59.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.4-66.4%) and 20.6% (95% CI, 14.3-27.6%), respectively. In the selected four RCTs, the pooled odds ratios for sustained response rate, ORR, and CRR were 3.00 (95% CI, 1.97-4.57; P < 0.01), 3.21 (95% CI, 2.15-4.78; P < 0.01), and 2.12 (95% CI, 1.17-3.86; P = 0.01), respectively. ATRA was associated with a reduction in relapse rate and salvage treatment rate (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18-0.50; P < 0.01; 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.56; P < 0.01, respectively). The pooled odds ratios for grade 1-2 dry skin, headache (or dizziness), and rash acneiform were 49.99 (95% CI, 16.05-155.67; P < 0.01), 1.75 (95% CI, 0.98-3.12; P = 0.06), and 0.37 (95% CI, 0.10-1.34; P = 0.13), respectively. This study suggests that ATRA may significantly improve the initial and long-term response of patients with ITP.

Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Adult Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Our Personal View

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired blood disorder that causes a reduction in circulating platelets with the potential for bleeding. The incidence of ITP is slightly higher in adults and affects more women than men until 60 years, when males are more affected. Despite advances in basic science, primary ITP remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The disease is heterogeneous in its clinical behavior and response to treatment. This reflects the complex underlying pathophysiology, which remains ill-understood. Platelet destruction plays a role in thrombocytopenia, but underproduction is also a major contributing factor. Active ITP is a proinflammatory autoimmune disease involving abnormalities within the T and B regulatory cell compartments, along with several other immunological abnormalities. Over the last several years, there has been a shift from using immunosuppressive therapies for ITP towards approved treatments, such as thrombopoietin receptor agonists. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has hastened this management shift, with thrombopoietin receptor agonists becoming the predominant second-line treatment. A greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms has led to the development of several targeted therapies, some of which have been approved, with others still undergoing clinical development. Here we outline our view of the disease, including our opinion about the major diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We also discuss our management of adult ITP and our placement of the various available therapies.

Sovleplenib (HMPL-523), a novel Syk inhibitor, for patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia in China: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2 study

BACKGROUND

Spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitor is a treatment option for primary immune thrombocytopenia. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, preliminary activity, and recommended phase 2 dose of sovleplenib in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2 study was conducted at nine hospitals in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years, had an ECOG performance score of 0-1, had primary immune thrombocytopenia for more than 6 months, and did not respond or relapsed after previous first-line treatment or had poor response or postoperative relapse after a splenectomy. Dose-escalation (100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg given orally once a day) and dose-expansion phases (recommended phase 2 dose) each consisted of an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period in which patients were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive sovleplenib or placebo with an interactive web response system followed by a 16-week, open-label period with sovleplenib. Patients, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment allocation during the first 8 weeks. The main efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients whose platelet count reached 30 × 10⁹ platelets per L or higher and was double of the baseline at two consecutive visits during 0-8 weeks without rescue therapy. Efficacy was evaluated by intention-to-treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03951623.

FINDINGS

Between May 30, 2019, and April 22, 2021, 62 patients were assessed for eligibility and 45 (73%) were randomly assigned. Patients received at least one dose of the study drug during the 8-week double-blind period (placebo [n=11] and sovleplenib 100 mg [n=6], 200 mg [n=6], 300 mg [n=16], and 400 mg [n=6]; this group was added following the observation of no protocol-specified safety events at the previous doses). All participants were Asian; 18 (40%) of 45 were male and 27 (60%) were female. The median age was 40·0 years (IQR 33·0-50·0). Ten (29%) of 34 patients in sovleplenib groups versus five (45%) of 11 in the placebo group received concomitant anti-primary immune thrombocytopenia therapy. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined as 300 mg once a day. The proportion of patients who met the main efficacy endpoint were three (50%; 95% CI 12-88) in the 100 mg group, three (50%; 12-88) in the 200 mg group, ten (63%; 35-85) in the 300 mg group, and two (33%; 4-78) in the 400 mg group compared with one (9%; 0-41) in the placebo group. The overall response rate in the 300 mg group was 80% (16 of 20 who received continuous sovleplenib plus those who crossed over from placebo) and the durable response rate was 31% (11-59; five of 16) in the continuous sovleplenib 300 mg and 75% (19-99; three of four) crossed from placebo to sovleplenib during 0-24 weeks. During the 28-day safety evaluation period, two grade 2 or worse treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the sovleplenib groups (hypertriglyceridaemia and anaemia). During 0-8 weeks, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were an increase in blood lactate dehydrogenase, haematuria, and urinary tract infection (seven [21%] of 34 in sovleplenib groups vs one [9%] of 11 in the placebo group); and occult blood-positive and hyperuricaemia (four [12%] vs three [27%] for each). No fatal treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded.

INTERPRETATION

Sovleplenib was well tolerated, and the recommended phase 2 dose showed a promising durable response in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia, which provides evidence for future investigations. A phase 3 trial is ongoing (NCT05029635) to confirm the efficacy and safety of sovleplenib in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia.

FUNDING

HUTCHMED.

Efficacy and safety of avatrombopag for thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A real-world data evaluation on 14 cases

OBJECTIVES

Thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a common and serious complication that leads to an increased risk of bleeding and poor prognosis. Traditional strategies consist of platelet transfusion, glucocorticoid therapy, intravenous human immunoglobulin, recombinant human thrombopoietin injection, and CD34+-selected hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but the effects of these treatments are not satisfactory and the treatment continues to be challenged. This study aims to determine the treating efficacy of avatrombopag, a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist, on thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT, and to increase the evidence-based medical evidence for the clinical use of this drug.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT underwent avatrom-bopag treatment from September 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively studied. Of these patients, 8 patients had delayed platelet engraftment (DPE) and 6 cases had secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). The efficacy and safety of the treatment and the survival of the patients were assessed.

RESULTS

The median treatment time of avatrombopag was 34 days, and no patients stopped treatment due to adverse reactions or drug intolerance. Compared with the treatment before, the levels of platelet count, megakaryocytes, and hemoglobin in patients were significantly increased (P=0.000 1, P=0.001 0, and P=0.001 7, respectively). The optimal platelet count of 13 patients reached the complete response standard after drug withdrawal. The median follow-up time of 14 patients was 371 days, and the 2-year overall survival rate was 78.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Avatrombopag is effective on increasing platelet counts in patients with thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT, with a good safety profile. It is a suitable therapeutic option for thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT.

Sustained Remission Off-Treatment (SROT) of TPO-RAs: The Burgos Ten-Step Eltrombopag Tapering Scheme

Background and Objectives: TPO-RAs (romiplostim/eltrombopag/avatrombopag) have broadly demonstrated high efficacy rates (59-88%), durable responses (up to three years) and a satisfactory safety profile in clinical trials. The effect of TPO-RAs is classically considered to be transient because platelet numbers usually dropped rapidly to baseline unless therapy was maintained. However, several groups have reported the possibility of successfully discontinuing TPO-RAs in some patients without further need for concomitant treatments. This concept is usually referred as sustained remission off-treatment (SROT). Materials and Methods: Unfortunately, we still lack predictors of the response to discontinuation even after the numerous biological, clinical and in vitro studies performed to study this phenomenon. The frequency of successful discontinuation is matter of controversy, although a percentage in the range of 25-40% may probably be considered a consensus. Here, we describe all major routine clinical practice studies and reviews that report the current position on this topic and compare them with our own results in Burgos. Results: We report our Burgos ten-step eltrombopag tapering scheme with which we have achieved an elevated percentage rate of success (70.3%) in discontinuing treatment. Conclusions: We hope this protocol may help successfully taper and discontinue TPO-RAs in daily clinical practice.

Recent progress in ITP treatment

In this review, the recently approved drugs avatrombopag and fostamatinib, which were not extensively covered within 2019 international recommendations for ITP, will be discussed in some detail. Avatrombopag appears more convenient than eltrombopag as it does not require dietary restrictions or subcutaneous administration like romiplostim. However, data on quality of life (QoL) are lacking and the rate of thromboembolic events in exposed patients is not negligible. Efficacy of fostamatinib, an inhibitor of macrophagic activity, is supported by placebo-controlled trials in patients refractory to several therapies, including TPO-RA. While hypertension and diarrhea have been reported, only one minor thrombotic event occurred in 146 exposed patients. In addition, several new treatment combinations and new agents entered clinical investigation in recent years. In a UK trial, combining mycophenolate mofetil with corticosteroids as first line therapy was more effective than corticosteroids alone, but at the cost of worse QoL. No combination, including oseltamivir or all-trans retinoic acid or danazol, resulted in convincing evidence of superior efficacy and safety when used in first or later lines of treatment. Agents targeting specific mechanisms are also discussed: sutimlimab (complement inhibitor); rilzabrutinib (BTK inhibitor) and efgartigimod (modified Fc fragment inhibiting FcRn). Only efgartigimod has completed phase 3 investigation.

A bibliometric analysis of primary immune thrombocytopenia from 2011 to 2021

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia. This bibliometric analysis was applied to identify the characteristics of global scientific output, the hotspots, and frontiers of ITP over the past 10 years. We retrieved publications from 2011 to 2021 from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Bibliometrix package, VOSviewer, and Citespace were used to analyse and visualize the trend, distribution, and hotspots of research on ITP. Altogether, there were 2084 papers, written by 9080 authors from 410 organizations in 70 countries/regions, published in 456 journals with 37 160 co-cited references. In the last decades, the most productive journal was British Journal of Haematology, China was the most productive country. and the most cited journal was Blood. Shandong University was the most productive institution in the field of ITP. NEUNERT C, 2011, BLOOD, CHENG G, 2011, LANCET, and PATEL VL, 2012, BLOOD were the top three most cited documents. "Thrombopoietin receptor agonist", "regulatory T cell" and "sialic acid" were three hotspots of the last decade. And "immature platelet fraction", "Th17", and "fostamatinib" would be research frontiers in the feature. The present study provided a novel insight for future research directions and scientific decision-making.

How we treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an immune-mediated bleeding disorder characterized by decreased platelet counts and an increased risk of bleeding. Multiple humoral and cellular immune abnormalities result in accelerated platelet destruction and suppressed platelet production in ITP. The diagnosis remains a clinical exclusion of other causes of thrombocytopenia. Treatment is not required except for patients with active bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, or cases in need of invasive procedures. Corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and anti-RhD immunoglobulin are the classical initial treatments for newly diagnosed ITP in adults, but these agents generally cannot induce a long-term response in most patients. Subsequent treatments for patients who fail the initial therapy include thrombopoietic agents, rituximab, fostamatinib, splenectomy, and several older immunosuppressive agents. Other potential therapeutic agents, such as inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase and neonatal Fc receptor, are currently under clinical evaluation. An optimized treatment strategy should aim at elevating the platelet counts to a safety level with minimal toxicity and improving patient health-related quality of life, and always needs to be tailored to the patients and disease phases. In this review, we address the concepts of adult ITP diagnosis and management and provide a comprehensive overview of current therapeutic strategies under general and specific situations.

Avatrombopag is effective in patients with chemoradiotherapy-induced aplastic anemia: a single-center, retrospective study

Aplastic anemia (AA) secondary to radiotherapy presents a difficult situation in the treatment of both the malignant tumor and AA itself. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of avatrombopag (AVA), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, in patients with AA secondary to chemoradiotherapy. In this retrospective study, patients with malignant tumors who were diagnosed with AA after radiotherapy and chemotherapy and accepted AVA between September 2020 and October 2021 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were selected. A total of 34 patients were enrolled, including 13 (38.2%) men, with a median age of 60 (20-71) years. At a median of 8 (6-18) months of follow-up, the overall response rates (ORRs) at 1, 3, and 6 months were 32.4%, 55.9%, and 58.8%, respectively, and the complete response rates (CRRs) were 5.9%, 14.7%, and 23.5%, respectively. The median time to respond was 3 (1-6) months. In total, 15.0% of patients relapsed during follow-up, but no clonal evolution was noticed. Mild side effects were observed in 17.6% of patients without drug withdrawal. At the end of follow-up, 17.6% of patients had tumors relapsed. Four patients died, three from tumor relapse and one from cerebral hemorrhage. The ORR and CRR did not correlate with eltrombopag before AVA (p > 0.05) but increased when the total exposure of AVA increased (p = 0.011), and the threshold for AVA response was a cumulative dose > 3,000 mg (p = 0.013). AVA yielded good response and tolerance in patients treated for AA secondary to chemoradiotherapy, and a higher dose may correlate with better response.