Physicians' perceptions of patient participation and the involvement of family caregivers in the palliative care pathway

Use of multimedia shared decision-making aids (EATING program) for improving advance care planning engagement among community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases: A cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Discussing advance care planning (ACP) preferences for nasogastric tube (NG) insertion remains challenging among older adults. Multimedia decision-making aids have demonstrated potential to enhance understanding and support informed decision-making.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of the EATING program (multimedia decision-making aids + traditional educational module) compared to usual care (traditional educational module alone) in improving ACP readiness on NG insertion for community older adults with chronic illness.

METHODS

A single blind, two-arm parallel cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted across four community villages in Northern Taiwan. Participants from two villages received the EATING program, while the other two villages received the usual care. Eligible criteria included community older adults aged ≥65 with at least one chronic disease who were able to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria included hearing or visual impairments or a history of mental illness. Pre- and post-intervention outcomes, along with one-month follow-up data, were analyzed using descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant immediate improvements in knowledge (p < 0.001), belief/behavior (p < 0.001), decision confidence (p < 0.001), and readiness for ACP (p < 0.001). The experimental group showed greater improvement, particularly in emotional response and preferences (Z = -5.51, p < 0.001), observed only in this group. Sustained effect on knowledge (B = 35.029, p < 0.001), emotional response and preferences (B = 9.342, p < 0.001), refusal NG tube insertion (Z = -2.770, p = 0.006), and likelihood of signing official documents (p = 0.035) were observed after one month.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the potential of multimedia program to enhance NG insertion discussions among community older adults. Further qualitative investigations and cultural adaptation are recommended.

Correlation Between Illness Uncertainty in Caregivers of Patients with Liver Cancer, Their Coping Styles, and Quality of Life

Objective

This study explores the correlation between coping style, quality of life, and illness uncertainty in the family caregivers of patients with liver cancer.

Methods

Employing convenience sampling, 210 family caregivers of patients with liver cancer who met the admission criteria were selected from a grade A infectious disease hospital in Beijing between January and December 2022. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, Caregiver Quality of Life, and the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale for Family Members. This study analysed the correlations between coping styles, quality of life, and illness uncertainty in these caregivers.

Results

The study found that family caregivers of patients with liver cancer had average scores for illness uncertainty (83.44 ± 11.86), coping style (33.19 ± 9.79; both positive [23.02 ± 6.81] and negative [10.17 ± 5.05]), and quality of life (169.53 ± 32.46). A negative association was observed between illness uncertainty in these caregivers and positive coping style (r = -0.207, p = 0.003), physical status (r = -0.182, p = 0.008), psychological status (r = -0.200, p = 0.004), and social adaptation (r = -0.229, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The study concludes that illness uncertainty in family caregivers of patients with liver cancer is at a moderate level. Furthermore, there is a notable correlation between illness uncertainty, coping style, and quality of life in these caregivers.

Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making is a key element of person-centred care and promoted as the favoured model in preference-sensitive decision-making. Limitations to implementation have been observed, and barriers and limitations, both generally and in the palliative setting, have been highlighted. More knowledge about the process of shared decision-making in palliative cancer care would assist in addressing these limitations.

AIM

To identify and synthesise qualitative data on how people with cancer, informal carers and healthcare professionals experience and perceive shared decision-making in palliative cancer care.

DESIGN

A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. We analysed data using inductive thematic analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus) from inception until June 2023, supplemented by backward searches.

RESULTS

We identified and included 23 studies, reported in 26 papers. Our analysis produced four analytical themes; (1) Overwhelming situation of 'no choice', (2) Processes vary depending on the timings and nature of the decisions involved, (3) Patient-physician dyad is central to decision-making, with surrounding support and (4) Level of involvement depends on interactions between individuals and systems.

CONCLUSION

Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care is a complex process of many decisions in a challenging, multifaceted and evolving situation where equipoise and choice are limited. Implications for practice: Implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice requires (1) clarifying conceptual confusion, (2) including members of the interprofessional team in the shared decision-making process and (3) adapting the approach to the ambiguous, existential situations which arise in palliative cancer care.

What makes the palliative care initial encounter meaningful? A descriptive study with patients with cancer, family carers and palliative care professionals

BACKGROUND

The palliative care initial encounter can have a positive impact on the quality of life of patients and family carers if it proves to be a meaningful experience. A better understanding of what makes the encounter meaningful would reinforce the provision of person-centred, quality palliative care.

AIM

To explore the expectations that patients with cancer, family carers and palliative care professionals have of this initial encounter.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive study with content analysis of transcripts from 60 semi-structured interviews.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients with cancer, 20 family carers and 20 palliative care professionals from 10 institutions across Spain.

RESULTS

Four themes were developed from the analysis of interviews: (1) the initial encounter as an opportunity to understand what palliative care entails; (2) individualised care; (3) professional commitment to the patient and family carers: present and future; and (4) acknowledgement.

CONCLUSION

The initial encounter becomes meaningful when it facilitates a shared understanding of what palliative care entails and acknowledgement of the needs and/or roles of patients with cancer, family carers and professionals. Further studies are required to explore how a perception of acknowledgement may best be fostered in the initial encounter.