Impact of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, 2, and 3 expression on the outcome of patients with gastric cancer

Implication of KDR Polymorphism rs2071559 on Therapeutic Outcomes and Safety of Postoperative Patients with Gastric Cancer Who Received S-1-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Objective

Regimens of S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy are of great significance in attenuating recurrence risk in postoperative patients with gastric cancer (GC). Kinase insert-domain receptor (KDR) gene plays an essential role in tumor growth and metastasis. This study aimed to investigate the implication of KDR genotyping on the therapeutic outcomes of patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 169 postoperative GC with pathological staging of II and III and no metastasis who received S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy were included retrospectively. Peripheral blood specimens were collected and prepared for KDR genotyping and KDR mRNA expression. Correlation between KDR genotype status and prognosis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and multivariate analysis was ultimately adopted using Cox regression analysis.

Results

Median disease-free survival (DFS) of the 169 patients with GC was 5.1 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.25-5.95] and median overall survival (OS) was 6.7 years (95% CI: 5.44-7.96). Rs2071559 was located at the upstream region, and the prevalence among 169 patients with GC was as follows: AA genotype in 104 cases (61.5%), AG genotype in 57 cases (33.7%), and GG genotype in 8 cases (4.7%), yielding a minor allele frequency of 0.22, which was consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P=0.958). Median DFS of patients with AA and AG/GG genotypes was 6.0 years and 4.0 years, respectively (P=0.002). Additionally, patients with the AA genotype had longer OS than those with the AG/GG genotype [median OS: not reached (NR) vs 5.5 years, P=0.011]. Additionally, KDR mRNA expression was significantly higher in patients with the AG/GG genotype than that in those with the AA genotype (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Rs2071559 in KDR gene might be a promising biomarker for evaluating the recurrence risk and OS of patients with GC who received S-1-based adjuvant chemotherapy. This conclusion should be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.

An Overview of Current Biomarkers, the Therapeutic Implications, and the Emerging Role of hERG1 Expression in Gastric Cancer: A Literature Review

Gastric cancer remains one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the world. It carries a high mortality rate, with cases being more prevalent in the developing world, and has been linked to diet and Helicobacter pylori infection. It is a highly heterogeneous disease, with most cases being of a sporadic nature. Most patients present at an advanced stage due to the asymptomatic nature of the early stages of the disease. A multidisciplinary approach is often best implemented to help decide how to best manage individual cases. However, the overall clinical outcome and survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer remain poor. Recent therapeutic advancements focus on the identification of molecular biomarkers associated with gastric cancer that have predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic implications. This enables the development of specific targeted therapies that have shown efficacy in numerous trials, either as monotherapy or in combination with standard chemotherapy. Despite this, tumour heterogeneity and treatment resistance are still issues leading to poor survival outcomes. An emerging approach is focusing efforts on the bidirectional crosstalk between tumour cells and the microenvironment through targeting ion channels. A key player in this is human ether-á-go-go-related gene 1 (hERG1). This voltage-gated potassium ion channel has been shown to have predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic significance, enabling the stratification of high-risk individuals. In addition, targeting hERG1 in combination with chemotherapy has been shown to potentiate tumour regression. This comprehensive literature review will aim to consolidate our understanding of current biomarkers in gastric cancer. The relevance of hERG1 in gastric cancer as a useful novel biomarker and the potential therapeutic implications as targeted therapy will be explored. This offers a new and personalised approach to helping to manage patients with gastric cancer.

Comprehensive analysis of the oncogenic roles of vascular endothelial growth factors and their receptors in stomach adenocarcinoma

Background

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their receptors (VEGFRs) play complicated oncogenic roles in multiple tumors by initiating and promoting tumor angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. The main goal of our study was to comprehensively investigate the oncogenic roles of VEGFs and VEGFRs in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD).

Methods

The present study applied multiple bioinformatic tools to comprehensively explore the expression levels, prognostic values, genetic alterations and immune infiltrations of VEGFs and VEGFRs in STAD patients.

Results

We found that VEGFA, VEGFC, placenta growth factor, FLT1, KDR, FLT4, and Neuropilin 1 were overexpressed in STAD, while the expression of VEGFB and VEGFD were decreased. Survival analysis revealed that higher transcription levels of VEGF/VEGFRs were obviously correlated with worse clinical outcome in STAD patients. Additionally, high alteration frequencies of VEGFs and VEGFRs (27%) were observed in STAD patients, and alterations of VEGFs and VEGFRs improved their prognosis. The expression of VEGFs and VEGFRs was remarkably associated with immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression in STAD patients.

Conclusion

Our study systematically explored the transcriptome profiles and distinct prognostic values of VEGFs and their receptors in STAD and contributed to a better understanding of the oncogenic roles of VEGF/VEGFR members in STAD.

Exploratory Analysis of Patients With Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma With or Without Liver Metastasis From the Phase 3 RAINBOW Study

PURPOSE

Liver metastasis (LM) is reported in approximately 40% of patients with advanced/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma; mGEA) and is associated with a worse prognosis. This post-hoc analysis from the RAINBOW trial reported the efficacy, safety, and biomarker outcomes of ramucirumab and paclitaxel combination treatment (RAM+PAC) in patients with (LM+) and without (LM-) LM at baseline.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (n=665) were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive either RAM+PAC (LM+: 150, LM-: 180) or placebo and paclitaxel (PL+PAC) (LM+: 138, LM-: 197). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using stratified Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. The correlation of dichotomized biomarkers (VEGF-C, D; VEGFR-1,2) with efficacy in the LM+ versus LM- subgroups was analyzed using the Cox regression model with reported interaction P-values.

RESULTS

The presence of LM was associated with earlier progression than those without LM, particularly in patients receiving PL+PAC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68). RAM+PAC treatment improved OS and PFS irrespective of LM status but showed greater improvement in LM+ than that in LM- (OS HR, 0.71 [LM+] vs. 0.88 [LM-]; PFS HR, 0.47 [LM+] vs. 0.76 [LM-]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between patients with and without LM. No predictive relationship was observed between biomarker levels (VEGF-C, D; VEGFR-1,2) and efficacy outcome (OS, PFS) (all interaction P-values >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RAM provided a significant benefit, irrespective of LM status; however, its effect was numerically stronger in patients with LM. Therefore, RAM+PAC is a clinically meaningful therapeutic option for patients with mGEA and LM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01170663.

Gastric Cancer Pre-Stage Detection and Early Diagnosis of Gastritis Using Serum Protein Signatures

Background: A gastric cancer (GC) diagnosis relies on histopathology. Endoscopy rates are increasing. Helicobacter pylori infection is a major GC risk factor. In an effort to elucidate abundant blood biomarkers, and potentially reduce the number of diagnostic surgical interventions, we investigated sera and biopsies from a cohort of 219 H. pylori positive and negative patients diagnosed with GC, gastritis, and ulcers. This allowed the comparative investigation of the different gastroduodenal diseases, and the exclusion of protein changes resulting from bacterial infection or inflammation of the gastric mucosa when searching for GC-dependent proteins. Methods: High-definition mass spectrometry-based expression analysis of tryptically digested proteins was performed, followed by multivariate statistical and network analyses for the different disease groups, with respect to H. pylori infection status. Significantly regulated proteins differing more than two-fold between groups were shortlisted, and their role in gastritis and GC discussed. Results: We present data of comparative protein analyses of biopsies and sera from patients suffering from mild to advanced gastritis, ulcers, and early to advanced GC, in conjunction with a wealth of metadata, clinical information, histopathological evaluation, and H. pylori infection status. We used samples from pre-malignant stages to extract prospective serum markers for early-stage GC, and present a 29-protein marker panel containing, amongst others, integrin β-6 and glutathione peroxidase. Furthermore, ten serum markers specific for advanced GC, independent of H. pylori infection, are provided. They include CRP, protein S100A9, and kallistatin. The majority of these proteins were previously discussed in the context of cancer or GC. In addition, we detected hypoalbuminemia and increased fibrinogen serum levels in gastritis. Conclusion: Two protein panels were suggested for the development of multiplex tests for GC serum diagnostics. For most of the elements contained in these panels, individual commercial tests are available. Thus, we envision the design of multi-protein assays, incorporating several to all of the panel members, in order to gain a level of specificity that cannot be achieved by testing a single protein alone. As their development and validation will take time, gastritis diagnosis based on the fibrinogen to albumin serum ratio may be a quick way forward. Its determination at the primary/secondary care level for early diagnosis could significantly reduce the number of referrals to endoscopy. Preventive measures are in high demand. The protein marker panels presented in this work will contribute to improved GC diagnostics, once they have been transferred from a research result to a practical tool.

Gastric Cancer: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Approaches

Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the most common deadly malignancies worldwide. Recently, several targeted therapeutics for treating unresectable or metastatic GC have been developed. Comprehensive characterization of the molecular profile and of the tumor immune microenvironment of GC has allowed researchers to explore promising biomarkers for GC treatment and has enabled a new paradigm in precision-targeted immunotherapy. In this article, we review established and promising new biomarkers relevant in GC, with a focus on their clinical implications, diagnostic methods, and the efficacy of targeted agents.

Neutralization of the induced VEGF-A potentiates the therapeutic effect of an anti-VEGFR2 antibody on gastric cancer in vivo

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) axis is an essential regulator of angiogenesis and important therapeutic target in cancer. Ramucirumab is an anti-VEGFR2 monoclonal antibody used for the treatment of several cancers. Increased circulating VEGF-A levels after ramucirumab administration are associated with a worse prognosis, suggesting that excess VEGF-A induced by ramucirumab negatively affects treatment efficacy and that neutralizing VEGF-A may improve treatment outcomes. Here, we evaluated the effect of combination treatment with an anti-VEGFR2 antibody and anti-VEGF-A antibody on gastric tumor progression and normal tissues using a preclinical BALB/c-nu/nu mouse xenograft model. After anti-VEGFR2 antibody treatment in mice, a significant increase in plasma VEGF-A levels was observed, mirroring the clinical response. The elevated VEGF-A was host-derived. Anti-VEGF-A antibody co-administration enhanced the anti-tumor effect of the anti-VEGFR2-antibody without exacerbating the toxicity. Mechanistically, the combination treatment induced intra-tumor molecular changes closely related to angiogenesis inhibition and abolished the gene expression changes specifically induced by anti-VEGFR2 antibody treatment alone. We particularly identified the dual treatment-selective downregulation of ZEB1 expression, which was critical for gastric cancer cell proliferation. These data indicate that the dual blockade of VEGF-A and VEGFR2 is a rational strategy to ensure the anti-tumor effect of angiogenesis-targeting therapy.

Weichang'an Formula Inhibits Tumor Growth in Combination with Bevacizumab in a Murine Model of Colon Cancer-Making up for the Deficiency of Bevacizumab by inhibiting VEGFR-1

Aim: Angiogenesis plays an important role in the initiation, development, and metastasis of malignant tumors. Antiangiogenic drugs combined with immune therapy are considered to have a synergistic effect on anti-tumor strategy. Weichang’an formula (WCAF) is a prescription of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) based on pharmaceutical screening and clinical experience. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of WCAF and its combined action with Bevacizumab (BEV) in colorectal cancer, and to identify the possible mechanism of action.

Methods: A human colon cancer cell (HCT 116) subcutaneous xenograft model was established in BALB/c-nu/nu mice. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized into each of four groups: control, WCAF treated, BEV treated, and WCAF plus BEV treated. Apoptosis was detected by TUNEL assay. Western blot was used to assess the protein levels of Leptin-R, STAT3, p-STAT3, BCL-2, and VEGFR-1. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the micro-vessel density (MVD) and AKT1. Leptin and Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) mRNA expression were detected by Real-time PCR (RT-PCR). A network pharmacology study and validation assay were carried out to find the underlying molecular targets of WCAF related to immune regulation.

Results: Compared with the control group, WCAF reduced tumor weight and volume, as well as promoted tumor cell apoptosis. WCAF treatment decreased the mRNA expression of Leptin and VEGF-A, while the protein levels of CD31, LEP-R, VEGFR-1, STAT3, and p-STAT3 were decreased in tumor tissues. In addition, VEGFR-1 protein expression was decreased in the WCAF group and the WCAF plus BEV group but not in the BEV group. The combination of WCAF and BEV demonstrated a partial additive anti-tumor effect in vivo. The pharmacological network also found there are 26 WCAF target proteins related to cancer immune and 12 cancer immune related pathways. The AKT1 protein expression in the WCAF and WCAF + BEV groups were significantly lower than the that in the control group (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: WCAF can inhibit tumor growth and promote apoptosis and inhibit tumor angiogenesis in subcutaneous xenografts of human colon cancer HCT-116 in nude mice. WCAF also makes up for the deficiency of BEV by inhibiting VEGFR-1. The VEGFR-1 expression between the combination group and BEV alone achieved statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). Combined with BEV, WCAF showed a partial additive anti-tumor effect. The mechanism may be related to Leptin/STAT3 signal transduction, VEGF-A, VEGFR-1 and WCAF target proteins related to cancer immune such as leptin and AKT1.

Circulating Biomarkers for Tumor Angiogenesis: Where Are We?

BACKGROUND

In recent years, several anti-angiogenic drugs have been developed and their addition to standard treatment has been associated with clinical benefits. However, the response to anti-angiogenic therapy is characterized by considerable variability. In this context, the development of dynamic non-invasive biomarkers would be helpful to elucidate the emergence of anti-angiogenic resistance as well as to correctly address the treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this review is to describe current reports on circulating diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers related to angiogenesis. We further discuss how this non-invasive strategy could improve the monitoring of tumor treatment and help clinical strategy.

RESULTS

We discuss the latest evidence in the literature regarding circulating anti-angiogenic markers. Besides growth factor proteins, different circulating miRNAs could exert a pro- or anti-angiogenic activity so as to represent suitable candidates for a non-invasive strategy. Recent reports indicate that tumor-derived exosomes, which are small membrane vesicles abundant in biological fluids, also have an impact on vascular remodeling.

CONCLUSION

Numerous circulating biomarkers related to angiogenesis have been recently identified. Their use will allow identifying patients who are more likely to benefit from a specific anti-angiogenic treatment, as well as detecting those who will develop resistance and/or adverse effects. Nonetheless, further studies are required to elucidate the role of these biomarkers in clinical settings.

The VEGFR-2 protein and the VEGFR-2 rs1870377 A>T genetic polymorphism are prognostic factors for gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

Angiogenesis is one of the key processes in the development of malignant tumors. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) signaling pathway regulates branching angiogenesis in cancer. In this study, we analyzed the associations of VEGF/VEGFR-2 proteins and VEGFR-2 genetic variations with the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC).

METHOD

We collected the clinical information of patients with GC and extracted genomic DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues. Immunohistochemical methods were used to detect the expression of VEGF and VEGFR-2 in GC tissues. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms of VEGFR-2 were detected by the TaqMan assay. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were applied to analyze the associations between clinicopathological characteristics, VEGFR-2 polymorphisms and GC prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 256 cases of GC were included in our study. VEGFR-2 (+) and VEGFR-2 (++/+++) protein expression levels were detected in 83 and 135 cases, respectively. High expression of the VEGFR-2 protein was associated with the poor prognosis of GC (log-rank test P = 0.026). No statistical significance was observed for the association between VEGF and the prognosis of GC. The VEGFR-2 rs1870377 A > T genetic polymorphism was discovered to be associated with the prognosis of GC (AA vs. AT, HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.06-2.68, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that the high expression of VEGFR-2, as well as the VEGFR-2 rs1870377 A > T genetic polymorphism, may be prognostic markers for GC.

Molecular Signaling in Tumorigenesis of Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is regarded as the fifth most common cancer and the third cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Mechanism of GC pathogenesis is still unclear and relies on multiple factors, including environmental and genetic characteristics. One of the most important environmental factors of GC occurrence is infection with Helicobacter pylori that is classified as class one carcinogens. Dysregulation of several genes and pathways play an essential role during gastric carcinogenesis. Dysregulation of developmental pathways such as Wnt/β-catenin signaling, Hedgehog signaling, Hippo pathway, Notch signaling, nuclear factor-kB, and epidermal growth factor receptor have been found in GC. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, as an important process during embryogenesis and tumorigenesis, is supposed to play a role in initiation, invasion, metastasis, and progression of GC. Although surgery is the main therapeutic modality of the disease, the understanding of biological processes of cell signaling pathways may help to develop new therapeutic targets for GC.

VEGFR-2 as a novel predictor of survival in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Expression of VEGFRs may affect cancer prognosis. The aim of this work is to evaluate the prognostic significance of VEGFRs of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library as well as ASCO and ESMO were searched systematically for articles reporting the prognostic significance of tissue VEGFRs in gastric cancer. The statistical analyses were carried out using Stata version 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of 8 articles comprising 950 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. The combined HR of studies evaluating total VEGFRs overexpression was 1.42 (95% CI 1.01-2.00, P = 0.044), suggesting that it had prognosis significance in overall survival of gastric cancer. Subgroup analysis showed that it was VEGFR-2 (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.31-2.49, P < 0.001) but not VEGFR-3 (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.45-1.82, P = 0.787) overexpression was associated with an increased risk of median overall survival (mOS) and it can be a potentially predictive biomarker for gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

VEGFR-2 overexpression is a promising negative prognosis predictor for patients with gastric cancer. The prognosis significance of VEGFR-3 still need further study.

Systemic effects of angiogenesis inhibition alter pharmacokinetics and intratumoral delivery of nab-paclitaxel

Angiogenesis is critical to the growth of tumors. Vascularization-targeting agents, with or without cytotoxic drugs, are widely used for the treatment of several solid tumors including esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. However, little is known about the systemic effects of anti-angiogenic therapies and how this affects the pharmacokinetics and intratumoral delivery of cytotoxic agents. In this study, patient-derived xenograft mouse models of esophageal adenocarcinoma were used to identify the effects of DC101, a murine vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and the intratumoral uptake of nab-paclitaxel (NPTX). We showed that DC101 had large systemic effects resulting in decreased vasculature of intraperitoneally located organs. As a consequence, after intraperitoneal administration of NPTX, plasma uptake (5.029 ± 4.35 vs. 25.85 ± 2.27 µM) and intratumoral delivery (5.48 ± 5.32 vs. 38.49 ± 2.805 pmol/mg) of NPTX were greatly impaired in DC101-treated animals compared to control animals. Additionally, routes of NPTX elimination were altered upon angiogenesis inhibition; unchanged renal clearance and intraperitoneal accumulation of NPTX were observed, but NPTX levels were significantly lower in the liver. Histological examination of the intestine revealed a reduced thickness of the intestinal wall following DC101 therapy and suggested seepage of intraperitoneally injected NTPX through the intestinal wall to explain its reduced uptake in liver, plasma, and tumor tissue. These data explain several adverse effects observed in the clinic when using anti-angiogenic therapies and also imply that the combined use of anti-angiogenesis and cytotoxic agents in both preclinical and clinical setting is still suboptimal.

The Impact of Ramucirumab on Survival in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized II/III Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ramucirumab is a fully immunoglobulin G (lgG) monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 (VEGFR2). Previous clinical trials suggested ramucirumab could improve the survival and increase the risk of adverse effects. Here, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in the treatment of advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Publications were searched from Pubmed, Embase database and clinicaltrials.gov. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to evaluate efficacy, and the risk ratio (RR) for adverse effects.

RESULTS

Ten relevant studies were included. Ramucirumab resulted in significant benefit in overall survival [OS, HR and 95% CI 0.87 (0.82-0.93), I(2): 0.0%] and progression-free survival [PFS, HR and 95% CI 0.74 (0.66-0.82), I(2): 67.4%]. Also the difference of time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (ORR) between two groups were also significant [0.70 (0.57-0.88) and 1.78 (1.40-2.25), respectively]. Ramucirumab could increase the risk of total adverse effects (TAEs, of any grade) by 1% (from 0 to 2%) and severe adverse effects (SAEs, grade > 2) by 17% (from 9 to 26%). The most frequently occurring TAEs were fatigue (54.71%), neutropenia (42.74%), bleeding (37.55%), nausea (34.63%) and stomatitis (33.74%). Most frequently occurring SAEs (grade ≥3) were neutropenia (33.43%), fatigue (12.08%), leukopenia (10.59%), hypertension (8.99%) and liver injury (8.74%).

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab could improve OS and PFS for patients suffering from advanced solid tumors. Ramucirumab could increase the risk of TAEs and SAEs.

Prognostic value of tropomyosin-related kinases A, B, and C in gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Tropomyosin-related kinase (Trk) receptors play critical roles in tumor development and are considered attractive targets for cancer therapy. We investigated correlations of the expression of TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC with clinicopathological features and outcomes in gastric cancer.

METHODS

Tumor samples were obtained from 221 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between 2003 and 2007. The expression of TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining. The relationship of their expression to clinicopathological factors and outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

High expression of TrkA, TrkB, or TrkC was significantly associated with histopathology (p = 0.022, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). High expression of TrkA was significantly correlated with variables related to tumor progression, including lymph node metastasis (p = 0.024) and distant metastasis or recurrence (p < 0.001). Distant metastasis or recurrence was found in a significantly higher proportion of patients with high expression of TrkC than in those with low expression (p = 0.036). High expression of TrkA was significantly associated with poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) in univariate analysis (p = 0.001). High expression of TrkA or TrkC was significantly associated with poorer disease-specific survival (DSS) in univariate analysis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, TrkA was an independent predictor of RFS [hazard ratio (HR), 2.294; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.309-4.032; p = 0.004] and DSS (HR, 2.146; 95 % CI, 1.195-3.861; p = 0.011). Expression of TrkB was not associated with RFS or DSS in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that TrkA expression was associated with tumor progression and poor survival, and was an independent predictor of poor outcomes in gastric cancer patients.

Clinical significance of platelet derived growth factor-C and -D in gastric cancer

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-C and PDGF-D are frequently upregulated in human cancers and play important roles in tumor progression, angiogenesis and metastasis. However, the distribution, frequency and prognostic value of PDGF-C and PDGF-D expression in gastric cancer have not been clarified. The present study evaluated the association between expression of PDGF-C and PDGF-D, clinicopathological factors and outcomes, in patients with gastric cancer. Gastric adenocarcinoma tumor samples were obtained from 204 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2003 and 2007. The expression of PDGF-C and PDGF-D was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining. High expression of PDGF-C and PDGF-D was detected in 114 (56%) and 151 (74%) tumors, respectively. PDGF-D expression was significantly associated with tumor depth (P=0.039), histopathology (P<0.01), tumor stage (P=0.01) and recurrence (P<0.01), whereas PDGF-C expression correlated only with histopathology (P=0.05). High PDGF-D expression was also associated with significantly shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) time (P<0.01), whilst high PDGF-C expression was associated with marginally, but not significantly, shorter RFS (P=0.10). On multivariate analysis, high PDGF-D expression was determined to be an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–9.4; P=0.02). These findings indicate that high PDGF-D expression is strongly associated with tumor progression, recurrence, distant metastasis and poor outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. PDGF-D may therefore be an independent prognostic factor and a novel therapeutic target.

Advancing pharmacological treatment options for advanced gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Improvement of conventional chemotherapy has been modest in the past decades.

AREAS COVERED

We review recent important studies of metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. For human epidermal growth factor receptors 2 (HER2) negative cancer, standard treatments are combinations of fluoropyrimidine and platinum with or without epirubicin or docetaxel in first-line therapy. Controversy exists regarding the use of triplet chemotherapies due to their toxicity. For HER2 positive cancer, standard treatments are combinations of fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin with trastuzumab. As second- or third-line treatment, taxanes or irinotecan prolonged survival compared with best supportive care alone, but the extension of overall survival was only 1 - 2 months. A recent study demonstrated that ramucirumab plus paclitaxel improved survival as a second-line therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Most trials have failed to demonstrate a benefit of targeted agents. It is important to identify predictive biomarkers to enrich an appropriate patient population for targeted agents such as HER2 status for trastuzumab.

Emerging kinase inhibitors of the treatment of gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common malignancy in the world. In the last years, for the first time in literature, the addition of a targeted therapy to standard chemotherapy has proved to prolong median overall survival. In this scenario, kinase inhibitors (KIs), smaller intracellular agents, could be an interesting and novel type of targeted treatment of metastatic GC both in first and further lines of therapy.

AREAS COVERED

Several KI have been evaluated in the preclinical setting. This review will underline the most relevant targeted pathways involved in GC tumorigenesis and disease progression including EGFR, VEGFR, c-MET, mTOR, fibroblast growth factor receptor, Src and Aurora kinases.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the good results of TOGA, RAINBOW and REGARD trials about the addition of monoclonal antibodies to standard of care in GC, the addition of KI seems not to achieve comparable interesting results in management of GC. However, an improved patient selection before and during treatment according to molecular characteristics, as well as combination studies evaluating the synergistic effect of combination schedules of different KIs and standard chemotherapy, or KI plus KI or KI plus antibodies-based therapy may reveal interesting results and lead to understand mechanisms of multi-drug resistance.

Apatinib for the treatment of gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Antiangiogenesis therapy plays an important role in cancer treatment. Apatinib mesylate, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, has been recommended as third-line treatment for metastatic gastric cancer patients.

AREAS COVERED

The current review summarizes the publications and conference reports relating to apatinib from preclinical and clinical research in gastric cancer. Apatinib showed good safety, tolerance and treatment efficacy in Phase I/II studies. In a Phase III study, apatinib prolonged the median overall survival of patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic gastric cancer by 55 days and the median progression-free survival by 25 days compared with placebo.

EXPERT OPINION

Apatinib is a new treatment option for advanced gastric cancer. Apatinib is expected to have a broader application when it has been evaluated worldwide. The key issues are to find biomarkers and overcome drug resistance.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, but not S100A4 or S100A6, correlates with prolonged survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

A major challenge in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) is to identify biomarkers that can predict disease prognosis and treatment response after cystectomy. Therefore, we analyzed the potential prognostic value of the proteins vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), S100A4, and S100A6 in UC.

METHODS

Retrospective outcome data and tumor specimens from 83 cystectomy patients with histologically confirmed invasive UC were included. Expression levels of VEGFR2 (also called flk-1 and KDR), S100A4, and S100A6 were analyzed in primary tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical staining and analysis of VEGFR2, S100A4, and S100A6 showed localization mainly in tumor cell cytoplasm. High VEGFR2 expression and low tumor category were independent variables associated with longer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival, revealed by a bivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model (both P<0.001). In addition, the univariate log-rank test and the Cox model demonstrated that OS beyond 2 years was significantly greater among patients with low S100A6 expression than in those with high S100A6 expression (P = 0.017 and 0.022, respectively). Differences in tumor expression of S100A4 were not significantly associated with outcome.

CONCLUSION

In this study, VEGFR2 expression was significantly correlated with risk of disease relapse and OS in a defined cohort of patients with UC of the bladder treated by cystectomy.

Clinicopathological features and prognostic roles of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and NRAS mutations in advanced gastric cancer

Background

RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK and PI3K-AKT pathways form a significant cascade for potential molecular target therapy in advanced cancer. The clinical significance of mutations in these genes in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is uncertain.

Methods

We collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fresh frozen tumor samples from AGC patients and analyzed the KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations by direct-sequencing. We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological features of these mutations in AGC patients, and selected patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Results

Among 167 AGC patients, mutations of KRAS codons 12/13 (N = 8/164, 4.9%), PIK3CA (N = 9/163, 5.5%), and NRAS codon 12/13(N = 3/159, 1.9%) were detected. Comparison of the clinicopathological features of the mutated KRAS, PIK3CA, NRAS genes with an all-wild type of these genes showed that the frequency of the intestinal type was significantly higher in patients whose tumor tissue contained KRAS mutations (P = 0.014). Among 125 patients with metastatic gastric cancer, patients with NRAS codon 12/13 mutations in their tumors had shorter overall survival compared with NRAS wild-type patients (MST: 14.7 vs 8.8 months, P = 0.011). By multivariate analyses, NRAS codon 12/13 mutation was an indicator for poor prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (adjusted HR 5.607, 95% CI: 1.637-19.203).

Conclusions

Our study indicated that mutations of KRAS, PIK3CA and NRAS were rare in AGC. NRAS mutations were likely to associate with poor prognosis in metastatic state of AGC patients, but further validation of other research is required.

Evidence for angiogenesis-independent contribution of VEGFR1 (FLT1) in gastric cancer recurrence

Angiogenesis plays an important role in cancer progression and involves activation of multiple signaling cascades. This study investigated the relationships between microvessel density, expression of VEGF and VEGFR1 (FLT1), and gastric cancer (GC) recurrence. Twenty-nine surgically treated GC cases with similar initial clinical presentation were selected for the study; 11 of these cases recurred within 3 years, while the remaining 18 did not. Microvessel density correlated with VEGF mRNA content, but neither of these parameters was associated with the disease outcome. When tumors were ranked according to the level of expression of angiogenic molecules, 9 out of 10 cases with the highest VEGFR1 expression belonged to the recurrence group, while none of the 10 GC with the lowest content of VEGFR1 mRNA had the disease relapse (p = 0.000). VEGFR1 expression did not show even a trend to correlation with the level of cancer tissue vascularization. Immunofluorescent staining by anti-VEGFR1 antibody revealed VEGFR1 expression in tumor cells but not in other cell types. Our data provide indirect support to the evidence for a non-angiogenic contribution of VEGFR1 in cancer pathogenesis.

Long-term follow-up of immunocytochemical analysis of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and its two receptors, VEGF-R1 (Flt-1) and VEGF-R2 (Flk-1/KDR), in oesophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of immunocytochemical analysis of tumour vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its 2 receptors, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2, remains incompletely investigated in patients with oesophagogastric cancer.


METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical resection were prospectively recruited between February 1999 and August 2000. Immunocytochemical analysis of VEGF, VEGF-R1 (Flt-1) and VEGF-R2 (Flk-1/KDR) was undertaken using validated techniques. Patients were followed up over a 10-year period using the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry.


RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were recruited (male=45, 73.8%) with a median age of 66.0 years (range 39-83). Forty-seven (77.0%) adenocarcinomas and 14 (23.0%) squamous cell carcinomas were resected. UICC tumour staging was: stage I=14.7%, II=24.6%, III=54.1% and IV=6.6%. VEGF, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 were over-expressed in tumour epithelial cells. VEGF-R2 expression was decreased in the presence of lymphovascular invasion and higher tumour grade. The 10-year survival rate was 19.7% (n=12) with a median follow-up of 808 (IQR 356-2313) days. On univariate analysis only lymphovascular invasion significantly predicted poor prognosis in this cohort (p=0.05). 


CONCLUSION

VEGF, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 were over-expressed in tumour epithelial cells. VEGF-R2 expression was decreased in the presence of more aggressive pathological variables. Larger studies are required to assess the prognostic significance of these biomarkers in oesophagogastric cancer.

Prognostic value of co-expression of STAT3, mTOR and EGFR in gastric cancer

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), proteins that mediate intracellular signaling related to cell growth, proliferation and differentiation, have received considerable interest as possible targets for cancer treatment. We examined whether the expression of STAT3, mTOR and EGFR correlates with clinicopathological features and patient outcome in gastric cancer. Tumor samples were obtained from 126 patients with gastric adenocarcinomas who underwent a radical gastrectomy between 1999 and 2002. The expression of phosphorylated STAT3 (p-STAT3), p-mTOR and EGFR was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining. The relations of these to clinicopathological factors and outcomes were assessed. The expression of p-STAT3 p-mTOR and EGFR positively correlated with the following variables related to tumor progression: the depth of tumor invasion (T1 vs. T2-4; p<0.001, p=0.036 and p<0.001, respectively), lymph node involvement (p=0.008, p=0.027 and p=0.007) and tumor stage (I vs. II-IV; p<0.001, p=0.041 and p<0.001). The expression of p-STAT3 and EGFR was significantly related to distant metastasis and recurrence (p=0.001 and p=0.039), as well as significantly poorer disease-specific survival (DSS; p=0.0018 and p=0.026). The expression of p-STAT3 was a marginally non-significant prognostic factor for DSS (hazard ratio=2.0, 95% CI 0.91-4.5, p=0.082). Increasing expression of p-STAT3, p-mTOR and EGFR was associated with progressively worse DSS. Interactions among p-STAT3, p-mTOR and EGFR may play an important role in tumor progression and outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.