A pilot study of quantitative assessment of mandible advancement using pressure?flow relationship during midazolam sedation

Mandibular advancement reduces pharyngeal collapsibility by enlarging the airway rather than affecting velopharyngeal compliance

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are frequently prescribed for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients, but approximately one third of patients experience no therapeutic benefit. Understanding the mechanisms by which MADs prevent pharyngeal collapse may help optimize MAD therapy. This study quantified the relative contributions of changes in airspace cross-sectional area (CSA) versus changes in velopharyngeal compliance in determining MAD efficacy. Sixteen patients with moderate to severe OSA (mean apnea-hypopnea index of 32 ± 15 events/h) underwent measurements of the velopharyngeal closing pressure (PCLOSE ) during drug induced sedated endoscopy (DISE) via stepwise reductions in nasal mask pressure and recording of the intraluminal pressure with a catheter. Airspace CSA was estimated from video endoscopy. Pharyngeal compliance was defined as the slope of the area-pressure relationship of the velopharyngeal airspace. MAD therapy reduced PCLOSE from a median of 0.5 cmH2 O pre-advancement to a median of -2.6 cmH2 O post-advancement (p = 0.0009), increased the minimal CSA at the velopharynx by approximately 20 mm2 (p = 0.0067), but did not have a statistically significant effect on velopharyngeal compliance (p = 0.23). PCLOSE had a strong correlation with CSA but did not correlate with velopharyngeal compliance. Our results suggest that MADs reduce velopharyngeal collapsibility by increasing airway size as opposed to affecting velopharyngeal compliance. This contradicts the speculation of previous literature that the effectiveness of MADs is partially due to a reduction in velopharyngeal compliance resulting from stretching of the soft palate. These findings suggest that quantification of velopharyngeal CSA pre- and post-MAD advancement has potential as a biomarker to predict the success of MAD therapy.

Critical to Know Pcrit: A Review on Pharyngeal Critical Closing Pressure in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

It is crucial to understand the underlying pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Upper airway collapsibility is an important pathophysiological factor that affects the upper airway in OSA. The aim of the current study was to review the existing body of knowledge on the pharyngeal collapsibility in OSA. After a thorough search through Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of science, the relevant articles were found and used in this study. Critical closing pressure (Pcrit) is the gold standard measure for the degree of collapsibility of the pharyngeal airway. Various physiological factors and treatments affect upper airway collapsibility. Recently, it has been shown that the baseline value of Pcrit is helpful in the upfront selection of therapy options. The standard techniques to measure Pcrit are labor-intensive and time-consuming. Therefore, despite the importance of Pcrit, it is not routinely measured in clinical practice. New emerging surrogates, such as finite element (FE) modeling or the use of peak inspiratory flow measurements during a routine overnight polysomnography, may enable clinicians to have an estimate of the pharyngeal collapsibility. However, validation of these techniques is needed.

Critical closing pressure (Pcrit) of the pharyngeal airway during routine drug-induced sleep endoscopy: feasibility and protocol

In obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there are various pathophysiological factors affecting the upper airway during sleep. Two prominent factors contributing to OSA are site and pattern of upper airway collapse and degree of pharyngeal collapsibility. In a clinical setting, drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used to visualize the structures of the upper airway. Critical closing pressure (Pcrit) is the gold standard measure of pharyngeal collapsibility. This prospective clinical study aimed to investigate the feasibility and protocol of Pcrit measurements during DISE. Thirteen patients with OSA were included. Pcrit was calculated using peak inspiratory airflow and inspiratory ventilation. The proposed protocol was successful in Pcrit measurement during DISE in all subjects [median[Q1;Q3] Pcrit for “peak inspiratory method” (n = 12): −0.84[−2.07;0.69] cmH₂O, “ventilation method” (n = 13): −1.32[2.32;0.47] cmH₂O], highlighting the feasibility of the approach. There was no significant difference (P = 0.67) between calculated Pcrit with either of the calculation methods, indicating high reliability. Correlation analysis showed Pcrit as an independent parameter of any of the anthropometric or polysomnographic parameters. The ventilation method proved to be more successful in assessment of Pcrit in subjects with epiglottic collapse (e.g., with high negative effort dependence). Subjects with palatal complete concentric collapse during DISE had a wide Pcrit range ([−2.86;2.51]cmH₂O), suggesting no close correlation between Pcrit and this DISE pattern (P = 0.38). Incorporation of Pcrit measurements into DISE assessments is feasible and may yield valuable additional information for OSA management. Combining Pcrit and DISE provides information on both the site and degree of upper airway collapse and the degree of pharyngeal collapsibility.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY The protocol of this study was successful in concomitant measurement of Pcrit during routine clinical endoscopy. Comparison of two calculation methods for Pcrit showed that the inspiratory ventilation method was more successful in assessment of Pcrit in subjects with epiglottic collapse who have high negative effort dependence. Subjects with palatal complete concentric collapse during DISE had a wide Pcrit range and did not have a greater Pcrit than patients in other site of collapse categories.

Upper-airway collapsibility and compensatory responses under moderate sedation with ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and propofol in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Ketamine is a potent sedative drug that helps to maintain upper-airway patency, due to its higher upper-airway dilator muscular activity and higher level of duty cycle, as seen in rats. However, no clinical trials have tested passive upper-airway collapsibility and changes in the inspiratory duty cycle against partial upper-airway obstruction in humans. The present study evaluated both the passive mechanical upper-airway collapsibility and compensatory response against acute partial upper-airway obstruction using three different sedative drugs in a crossover trial.

METHODS

Eight male volunteers entered this nonblinded, randomized crossover study. Upper-airway collapsibility (passive critical closing pressure) and inspiratory duty cycle were measured under moderate sedation with ketamine, propofol, and dexmedetomidine. Propofol, dexmedetomidine, and ketamine anesthesia were induced to obtain adequate, same-level sedation, with a BIS value of 50-70 and the OAA/S score of 2-3 and RASS score of -3.

RESULTS

The median passive critical closing pressure of 0.08 [-5.51 to 1.20] cm H2 O was not significantly different compared to that of propofol sedation (-0.32 [-1.41 to -0.19] cm H2 O) and of dexmedetomidine sedation (-0.28 [-0.95 to -0.03] cm H2 O) (p = .045). The median passive RUS for ketamine 54.35 [32.00 to 117.50] cm H2 O/L/s was significantly higher than that for propofol 5.50 [2.475 to 19.60] cm H2 O/L/s; (mean difference, 27.50; 95% CI 9.17 to 45.83) (p = .009) and for dexmedetomidine 19.25 [4.125 to 22.05] cm H2 O/L/s; (mean difference, 22.88; 95% CI 4.67 to 41.09) (p = .021). The inspiratory duty cycle increased significantly as the inspiratory airflow decreased in passive conditions for each sedative drug, but behavior differed among the three sedative drugs.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that ketamine sedation may have an advantage of both maintained passive upper-airway collapsibility and a compensatory respiratory response, due to both increase in neuromuscular activity and the increased duty cycle, to acute partial upper-airway obstruction.

Mandibular advancement impairs swallowing ability more than head extension but less than mouth opening in the supine position

Mandibular advancement in the supine position may influence swallowing during dental treatment under intravenous sedation. This study investigated the influence of mandibular advancement in the supine position on swallowing ability, compared with head extension and mouth opening. The water swallowing test was performed in 13 healthy, awake, supine, adult subjects under four head and mandibular positions. An electromyogram of the suprahyoid muscles was recorded; the duration and peak amplitude were examined. A greater volume of water remained in the mouth during mouth opening and mandibular advancement relative to the neutral position; the volume in the mandibular advancement position was larger and smaller than that in the head extension position and during mouth opening, respectively. The duration of the electromyogram in the head extension position was longer than that in the mandibular advancement position, without differences in the amplitude. Thus, swallowing ability in the supine position was more impaired with mandibular advancement, relative to neutral and head extension positions, but less than that observed with mouth opening. Although unconfirmed by electromyogram, our findings suggest that head extension might improve airway patency by reducing the impairment of swallowing ability compared with mandibular advancement.

The effects of hormonal status on upper airway patency in normal female subjects during propofol anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the mechanical upper airway properties and compensatory neuromuscular responses to obstruction during propofol anesthesia in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital.

SUBJECTS

12 premenopausal female volunteers for studies of upper airway collapse throughout their menstrual cycle during the follicular phase (6 -10 days) and mid-late luteal phase (20 - 24 days).

MEASUREMENTS

The level of propofol anesthesia (1.5 - 2.0 μg/mL) required to suppress arousal responses was determined by Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scoring (level 2) and confirmed by bispectral index monitoring. Pressure-flow relationships were constructed to evaluate collapsibility (P(CRIT)) and up-stream resistance (R(US)) during acute [Passive; hypotonic electromyography (EMG)] and sustained (Active; elevated EMG) changes in nasal mask pressure. The difference between passive P(CRIT) and active P(CRIT) (ΔP(CRIT A-P)) represented the magnitude of the compensatory response to obstruction.

MAIN RESULTS

Passive P(CRIT) was significantly higher in the mid-late luteal phase (-4.7 cm H(2)O) than in the follicular phase (-6.2 cmH(2)O; P < 0.05). Active P(CRIT) significantly decreased compared with passive P(CRIT) in the follicular phase (-10.1 cm H(2)O) and in the mid-late luteal phase (-7.7 cm H(2)O) and (P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted in ΔP(CRIT) between the follicular (3.9 ± 2.9 cm H(2)O) and mid-late luteal phases (3.0 ± 2.6 cm H(2)O). No differences were seen in R(US) between the menstrual phases for either the passive (P = 0.8) or active (P = 0.75) states.

CONCLUSIONS

Menstrual phase has an effect on anatomical alterations (mechanical properties) in the hypotonic upper airway during propofol anesthesia.

Effect of end-expiratory lung volume on upper airway collapsibility in sleeping men and women

The relationship between changes in absolute end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and collapsibility has not been rigorously quantified. We hypothesized that pharyngeal collapsibility varies inversely with absolute lung volume in sleeping humans during 1) conventional and 2) isovolume measurements of passive critical pressure (Pcrit). Eighteen healthy subjects (11 male, 7 female) slept in a negative pressure ventilator for measurements of pharyngeal collapsibility (Pcrit) during non-rapid eye movement sleep. EELV was 1) allowed to vary with changes in nasal pressure for conventional Pcrit measurements and 2) controlled by maintaining a fixed pressure difference across the respiratory system (P(RS)) from the nose to the body surface for isovolume Pcrit measurements at elevated EELV (P(RS) = +10 cmH(2)O), reduced EELV (P(RS) = -5 cmH(2)O), and functional residual capacity (FRC; P(RS) = 0 cmH(2)O). In each condition, the absolute EELV was determined and the corresponding Pcrit was derived from upper airway pressure-flow relationships. In the entire group, Pcrit varied inversely with EELV (P < 0.001). Pcrit decreased as EELV increased from the conventional to the FRC isovolume condition by -3.5 ± 1.0 cmH(2)O/l (P < 0.003). Subjects with a conventional Pcrit below -2 cmH(2)O exhibited greater reductions in EELV and correspondingly greater decreases in the FRC isovolume compared with the conventional Pcrit (P < 0.001). The overall response, ΔPcrit/ΔEELV, was -2.0 ± 0.2 cmH(2)O/l (P < 0.001) and did not differ between men and women (P = 0.16). Nevertheless, men and women differed significantly in FRC (2.63 ± 0.16 vs. 1.88 ± 0.13 liters, P <0.05) and FRC isovolume Pcrit (-2.3 ± 0.8 vs. -7.2 ± 1.2 cmH(2)O, P < 0.05), implying that the men had larger lungs and more collapsible airways than the women. The ΔPcrit/ΔEELV response was independent of sex, conventional Pcrit, body mass index, and neck, waist, and hip circumferences. We conclude that Pcrit varies inversely with absolute EELV, which may lead to 1) an underestimation of the magnitude of quantitative differences in Pcrit across the spectrum from health (negative Pcrit) to disease (positive Pcrit) and 2) increases in sleep apnea susceptibility in obesity.

The mandible advancement may alter the coordination between breathing and the non-nutritive swallowing reflex

The coordination between nasal breathing and non-nutritive swallowing serves as a protective reflex against potentially asphyxiating material, i.e. saliva and secretions, entering the respiratory tract. Although this protective reflex is influenced by positional changes in the head and body, the effect of mandible position on this reflex is not fully understood. We examined the effect of mandible advancement associated with mouth opening on the coordination between nasal breathing and non-nutritive swallowing induced by continuous infusion of distilled water into the pharyngeal cavity. The combination of mandible advancement and mouth opening increased the duration of swallowing apnoea and submental electromyographic burst duration. When the mandible was advanced with the mouth open, the duration of swallowing apnoea increased significantly compared with the centric position (0.79 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.64 +/- 0.12 s, P < 0.05, n = 12), and the duration of submental electromyographic activity increased significantly (2.11 +/- 0.63 vs. 1.46 +/- 0.25 s, P < 0.05, n = 12). Mandible advancement with mouth opening altered the respiratory phase resetting during swallowing and the timing of swallow in relation to respiratory cycle phase. We conclude that mandible re-positioning may strongly influence the coordination between nasal breathing and non-nutritive swallowing by altering respiratory parameters and by inhibiting movement of the tongue-jaw complex.

Obesity and upper airway control during sleep

Mechanisms linking obesity with upper airway dysfunction in obstructive sleep apnea are reviewed. Obstructive sleep apnea is due to alterations in upper airway anatomy and neuromuscular control. Upper airway structural alterations in obesity are related to adipose deposition around the pharynx, which can increase its collapsibility or critical pressure (P(crit)). In addition, obesity and, particularly, central adiposity lead to reductions in resting lung volume, resulting in loss of caudal traction on upper airway structures and parallel increases in pharyngeal collapsibility. Metabolic and humoral factors that promote central adiposity may contribute to these alterations in upper airway mechanical function and increase sleep apnea susceptibility. In contrast, neural responses to upper airway obstruction can mitigate these mechanical loads and restore pharyngeal patency during sleep. Current evidence suggests that these responses can improve with weight loss. Improvements in these neural responses with weight loss may be related to a decline in systemic and local pharyngeal concentrations of specific inflammatory mediators with somnogenic effects.