Banding of Hemodialysis Access to Treat Hand Ischemia or Cardiac Overload

Long term outcomes of 'Christmas Tree' banding for haemodialysis access induced distal ischemia: A 13-year experience

BACKGROUND

The reduction in distal arterial flow following arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation can cause a perfusion deficit known as haemodialysis access induced distal ischemia (HAIDI). Various techniques have been advocated to treat this difficult problem with varying success. We present the long-term outcomes following a novel banding technique.

METHODS

46 patients in this cohort from 2008 to 2021 underwent a novel banding procedure using a Dacron™ patch shaped with one slit-end and saw-tooth edges (resulting in a 'Christmas-tree' pattern) to provide a ratchet mechanism to progressively constrict the fistula outflow. Real-time finger perfusion pressure monitoring allowed an accurate reduction in AVF flow whilst increasing distal arterial perfusion pressure. Baseline characteristic were recorded and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were obtained to calculate the post-intervention primary, assisted primary and secondary patency.

RESULTS

29 patients presented with rest pain and 11 presented with tissue loss due to distal ischemia. The post-intervention primary access patency was 100%, 98%, 78% and 61% at 30, 60 and 180 days and 1 year respectively. Complete resolution of symptoms was achieved in 74% (n = 34) of patients and a partial response needing no further intervention was achieved in 11% (n = 5) of patients. A Youden index calculation suggested that digital pressures of 41 mm Hg or lower in an open AVF were highly sensitive for symptomatic hand ischemia whereas pressures greater than 65 mm Hg ruled out distal ischemia.

CONCLUSION

'Christmas-tree' banding with on table finger systolic pressures is not only an efficacious and durable method for treating HAIDI but also preserves fistula patency.

A scoping review on surgical reduction of high flow arteriovenous haemodialysis access

Volume flow (Qa) > 1.5-2 l /minQa in arteriovenous accesses may be associated with high flow related systemic or locoregional complications. A variety of surgical techniques are advocated for Qa reduction. Aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of available evidence regarding the efficacy of this broad spectrum of interventions for Qa reduction in patients with a high flow haemodialysis access. PubMed and Embase were searched according to PRISMA-guidelines. Studies on invasive management of HFA were selected. Inclusion required an English description of surgical techniques in human HFAs including pre- and postoperative access flow-values. Sixty-six studies on 940 patients (mean age 56 years (3-90 years), male 62%, diabetes mellitus 26%, brachial artery-based arteriovenous access 65%) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Performed techniques were banding (58%), revision using distal inflow (12%), plication/anastomoplasty (10%), graft interposition (5%), proximal radial artery ligation (3%), aneurysm repair (4%), or miscellaneous other techniques (8%). Definition of HFA, work-up, indication for surgery and intraoperative monitoring were diverse. All techniques reduced Qa on the short term (mean drop 0.9-1.7 l/min). Secondary access patency rates varied between 70% and 93% (mean follow-up 15 (0-189) months). Definitions of success and recurrence varied widely precluding a comparison of efficacy of techniques. Patient specific factors legitimizing invasive treatment for HFA are discussed. Recommendations on reporting standards when dealing with HFA surgery are provided. In conclusion, the present report on the current management of high flow access does not allow for drawing any definite conclusions due to a lack of standardization in definition, indications for surgical intervention and techniques. Randomized trials comparing different Qa reducing techniques in symptomatic patients are warranted, as are trials comparing a wait-and-see approach versus Qa reduction in asymptomatic patients. As an overview of the variety of techniques was lacking, this scoping review might serve as a map for future researchers.

Contemporary outcomes of precision banding for high flow hemodialysis access

OBJECTIVE

High-flow hemodialysis accesses are a well-recognized source of patient morbidity. Among available management strategies inflow constriction based on real-time physiologic flow monitoring offers a technically straightforward data-driven approach with potentially low morbidity. Despite the benefits offered by this approach, large contemporary series are lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained clinical database was undertaken to capture patients undergoing precision banding within a signal tertiary care institution between 2010 and 2019. Multivariable logistic regression modeling of thrombosis within 30 days and re-banding within 1 year were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 297 patients underwent banding during the study period for a total number of 398 encounters. Median [IQR] follow-up was 157 [52-373] days. Most accesses were upper arm with brachial artery inflow (84%) and half of the banding procedures were performed for flow imbalance based on exam, duplex, or fistulogram. Median flow rate reduction was 58%. The 30-day thrombosis rate after banding was 15 of 397 (3.8%) with a median time to event of 5.5 days (2-102). The re-banding rate within a year was 54 of 398 (14%) with a median time to re-banding of 134 days [56-224]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using a univariate screen did not identify any predictors of 30-day thrombosis. Having a forearm radial-cephalic AVF compared to all other access types was protective against need for rebanding at 1 year (OR 0.12 95% CI 0.02-0.92, p = 0.04), as was flow imbalance as the indication for banding (OR 0.43 95% 0.23-0.79, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Precision banding offers an effective, low-morbidity approach for high-flow hemodialysis accesses. Early thrombosis is a rare event after precision banding, although in the long term, one in four patients will require re-banding to maintain control of flow volumes.

The Results of The Interposition Graft-Technique in Treatment of High Flow Vascular Access

OBJECTIVE

High-flow (HF) vascular access (VA) is a fearsome condition potentially responsible for cardiac or pulmonary complications, steal syndrome and hand ischemia. The present study was conducted to report the results achieved in a group of patients undergoing interposition-graft technique to treat HF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis of clinical, ultrasound and echocardiography data collected from the review of medical charts was performed. Flow reduction, complications and need for secondary interventions were investigated.

RESULTS

Among a total 498 hemodialysis access interventions performed during a 6-years period, 30 patients (n 15, 50% male, median age 63.5, range 42-91 years) presented with high-flow (median flow 1.9 L/min, range 1.5-4 L/min). 18 patients were asymptomatic (60%); 6 (20%) suffered from a severe distal hand ischemia; 5 (16.6%) developed signs of congestive heart failure and 1 patient (3.3%) presented with pulmonary hypertension. In twenty patients (66.7%) the access was preserved by the interposition of a 6 mm polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) prosthesis. This approach was used as a primary flow reduction technique in 16 patients (80%) or the failure of a previously attempted procedure in 4 cases. No intraoperative complications were observed. Post-operative median VA flow was 1.1 L/min (range 0.900-2 L/min), with a median flow reduction of 0.770 L/min (range 0.100-2.8 L/min). At a median follow-up of 9 months (range 1-42), 95% (n 19) of patients were free from recurrences.

CONCLUSION

In treatment of HF-VA graft interposition demonstrated satisfactory results at the mid-term follow-up. More data are needed to affirm this technique as the preferential one.

Systolic finger pressures during an Allen test before hemodialysis access construction predict severe postoperative hand ischemia

OBJECTIVE

The Allen Test is a simple bedside method for determining hand perfusion. Earlier studies in hemodialysis (HD) patients found that an Allen Test before access construction did not predict hand ischemia later on. The study aimed to assess whether an Allen test combined with finger plethysmography before access surgery has a potential to predict the onset of severe hemodialysis access induced distal ischemia (HAIDI).

METHODS

Prior to the first access construction in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, systolic finger pressures (Pdig, mmHg) were obtained using plethysmography at rest and following serial compression of the radial and ulnar artery. A drop in Pdig (∂Pdig) was calculated as the difference between Pdig-rest and Pdig-compression. Severity of postoperative HAIDI was graded as suggested by a 2016 consensus meeting. Patients with a severe type of HAIDI (grade 2b-4, intolerable pain, invasive treatment required) were compared with controls not having HAIDI.

RESULTS

A total of 105 CKD patients (age 70 ±13, 65% males) receiving their first access between January 2009 and December 2018 in one center fulfilled study criteria. Ten patients (10%) developed severe HAIDI 14 ±5 months after access construction. Prior to access creation, all HAIDI patients demonstrated a radial or ulnar dominant hand perfusion pattern compared to just 57% in controls (p=.010). Compression resulted in an almost two-fold greater ∂Pdig in patients with severe HAIDI (51 ±8 mm Hg vs. 27 ±3 mm Hg, p=.005). A 40 mm Hg ∂Pdig cut-off value demonstrated optimal tests characteristics, (sensitivity 80%, specificity 77%, PPV 27%, NPV 97%) indicating a 10 times greater risk of developing severe HAIDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Finger plethysmography quantifying ∂Pdig during an Allen test prior to access creation may identify patients who have a substantially increased risk of developing severe hand ischemia following hemodialysis access surgery.

Severe hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia may be associated with poor survival

BACKGROUND

Some hemodialysis patients develop hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia due to insufficient loco-regional perfusion pressure and consequent poor arterial flow. We hypothesized that patients with severe hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia had worse survival compared with patients with mild or no hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective observational cohort study included three groups of prevalent hemodialysis patients with an upper extremity vascular access between 2006 and 2018. Symptomatic patients had signs and symptoms of hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia and low digital brachial indices (<60%) and were divided into a mild (Grade I-IIa) and a severe hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia (IIb-IV) group. The control group consisted of hemodialysis patients without signs of hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia with digital brachial indices ≥60%. Factors potentially related to 4-year survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mild hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia-patients displayed higher digital brachial indices (n = 23, 41%, ±3) compared with severe hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia-patients (n = 28, 24%, ±4), whereas controls had the highest values (n = 48, 80%, ±2; p < .001). A total of 44 patients (44%) died during follow-up. Digital brachial index (hazards ratio 0.989 [0.979-1.000] p = .046) was related to overall mortality following correction for presence of arterial occlusive disease (hazards ratio 2.28 [1.22-4.29], diabetes (hazards ratio 2.00 [1.07-3.72], and increasing age (hazards ratio 1.03 [1.01-1.06] as was digital pressure (hazards ratio 0.990 [0.983-0.998], p = .011). Overall survival was similar in mild hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia and controls (2-year, 79% ±5; 4-year, 57% ±6, p = .818). In contrast, 4-year survival was >20% lower in patients with severe hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia (2-year 62%± 10; 4-year 34% ± 10; p = .026).

CONCLUSION

Presence of severe hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia may be associated with poorer survival in hemodialysis patients. Lower digital brachial index values are associated with higher overall mortality, even following correction for other known risk factors.

Short interposition with a small-diameter prosthetic graft for flow reduction of a high-flow arteriovenous fistula

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of a short interposition using a small-diameter prosthetic graft as a flow-limiting procedure to manage symptomatic high-flow arteriovenous fistula (AVF).

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records on a case series was conducted. From June 2004 to April 2017, there were 25 patients with clinical symptoms of high output cardiac failure and progressive dilation of aneurysmal fistula vein due to high-flow AVF (≥1.5 L/min) who underwent short interposition with a 5-mm prosthetic graft at Saitama Medical Center. The primary outcome was the relief of clinical symptoms; other outcome measures included technical success, surgical complications, patency of vascular access, and postoperative changes in local and systemic hemodynamics as assessed by Doppler ultrasound.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent short interposition for cardiac indications (n = 16) and aneurysmal dilation (n = 9). The technical success rate was 100%. The clinical symptoms were relieved in 24 patients (96.0%). Mean reduction in access blood flow was 52.4%. Cumulative primary unassisted patency rates (± standard error) at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 76.2% ± 9.3%, 70.4% ± 10.3%, and 58.1% ± 11.6%, respectively. Secondary patency rates (± standard error) at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 81.8% ± 8.2%, 71.5% ± 9.9%, and 71.5% ± 9.9%, respectively. Complications included access occlusion due to late thrombosis (n = 5 [21.7%]) and graft infection (n = 1 [4.3%]) in the median follow-up period of 3.9 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Short interposition with a prosthetic graft is a simple, effective, and durable treatment option for end-stage renal disease patients with cardiac symptoms and progressive dilation of the fistula vein due to high-flow AVF, offering clinical symptom resolution while preserving the autologous behavior of the initial access.

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Graft Inclusion Technique: A New Flow Reduction Procedure for High Flow Arteriovenous Fistulae

Objective: Flow reduction is required to preserve vascular access in cases with high flow access (HFA). We report a new flow reduction procedure, the graft inclusion technique (GIT).

Methods: The GIT procedure developed by us involves the intraluminal placement and suturing of a 4-mm polytetrafluoroethylene graft to the anastomosis and outflow tract to plicate the enlarged anastomosis and maintain lower flow volumes. Flow reduction for HFA was retrospectively assessed in a series of 25 patients (age 65±12 years; 17 males and 8 females) to evaluate flow volume and patency rate, wherein 10 patients underwent conventional methods of flow reduction and 15 underwent GIT.

Results: Compared with preprocedure values, mean flow volume (MFV) was significantly lower after the procedure with both the conventional methods (1,817 vs. 586 ml/min; P<0.05) and the GIT (2,262 vs. 890 ml/min; P<0.05). An increase in MFV occurred during follow-up after conventional flow reduction (586 vs. 1,036 ml/min), while GIT could maintain lower MFV (890 vs. 791 ml/min), suggesting that GIT can significantly lower MFV levels (2,262 vs. 791 ml/min; P<0.05) and maintain these lower MFV levels during follow-up. Secondary patency rate for the GIT was 100% at 1 year and 83% at 3 years.

Conclusion: The GIT may be used as an access-preserving, reliable, long-term, and stable flow-reducing procedure that does not require flow adjustment during surgery.

A Report of Two Cases of Hazards Associated with High Flow Arteriovenous Fistula in ESRD Patients

High flow arteriovenous fistulas are a common clinical entity affecting patients with end-stage renal failure receiving hemodialysis. Given the difficulty in predicting who will develop a high flow arteriovenous fistula the exact prevalence is unclear. We present two cases of patients with high flow arteriovenous fistula that developed clinical cardiac failure at a time point after the fistula was placed with findings of significant cephalic arch stenosis. Both patients required treatment of cephalic arch stenosis with balloon angioplasty with subsequent surgical aneurism resection. Accurate and timely diagnosis of high flow arteriovenous hemodynamics by prospective monitoring of volumetric flow and cardiac function is required to halt this process prior to cardiac compromise.

Arteriovenous access banding revisited

Purpose

The aim of this study is to validate the current applicability of arteriovenous access banding in high flow access (HFA) and/or haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI).

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at the GEV (Grupo de Estudos Vasculares) vascular access centre. The clinical records of consecutive patients undergoing banding for HAIDI and HFA symptoms, between June 2011 and January 2015, were reviewed until April 2015. All vascular access patients’ consultation records and surgical notes were reviewed. We analysed and compared patients’ age, gender, comorbidities, symptoms and intraoperative ultrasound control. We defined technical failure as recurrence of symptoms, requiring new banding. Excessive banding, access thrombosis, rupture and false aneurysm development were registered as complications. Primary clinical success was defined as improvement of symptoms or effective flow reduction after banding, with no need for reintervention. If one reintervention was necessary, we have defined it as secondary clinical success.

Results

Overall, 119 patients underwent banding: 64 (54%) with HAIDI and 55 (46%) with HFA. The HAIDI group was significantly older (65 ± 13 years compared with 56 ± 22 years, p = 0.001) and had significantly greater number of patients with diabetes (56% vs 24%, p = 0.004). Primary success was achieved in 85 patients (71.4%) and the secondary success rate was 84.9%. Older age (p = 0.016) and intraoperative ultrasound control (p = 0.012) were significantly associated with primary success.

Conclusions

Our results do not corroborate the high incidence of thrombosis previously reported as associated with AV access banding and suggest that ultrasound control is crucial for preventing technical failure. The procedure was effective on both compared groups.

Dialysis-associated steal syndrome (DASS)

INTRODUCTION

In this article, we will review the clinical symptoms of dialysis access steal syndrome (DASS), evaluation, treatment options, and our approach and treatment algorithm.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature discussing different aspects of DASS including its epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, evaluation and management options.

RESULTS

DASS is the most dreaded complication of access surgery. Although the incidence is low, all providers caring for dialysis patients should be aware of this problem. Symptoms can range from mild to limb threatening. Although various tests are available, the diagnosis of DASS remains a clinical one and requires thoughtful management to have the best outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple treatment options exist for steal. We present diagnostic evaluation and management algorithm.

Arteriovenous access ischemic steal (AVAIS) in haemodialysis: a consensus from the Charing Cross Vascular Access Masterclass 2016

Arteriovenous access ischaemic steal (AVAIS) is a serious and not infrequent complication of vascular access. Pathophysiology is key to diagnosis, investigation and management. Ischaemia distal to an AV access is due to multiple factors. Clinical steal is not simply blood diversion but pressure changes within the adapted vasculature with distal hypoperfusion and resultant poor perfusion pressures in the distal extremity. Reversal of flow within the artery distal to the AV access may be seen but this is not associated with ischaemia in most cases.

Terminology is varied and it is suggested that arteriovenous access ischemic steal (AVAIS) is the preferred term. In all cases AVAIS should be carefully classified on clinical symptoms as these determine management options and allow standardisation for studies.

Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease are risk factors but a ‘high risk patient’ profile is not clear and definitive vascular access should not be automatically avoided in these patient groups.

Multiple treatment modalities have been described and their use should be directed by appropriate assessment, investigation and treatment of the underlying pathophysiology. Comparison of treatment options is difficult as published studies are heavily biased. Whilst no single technique is suitable for all cases of AVAIS there are some that suit particular scenarios and mild AVAIS may benefit from observation whilst more severe steal mandates surgical intervention.

High hemodialysis vascular access flow and impaired right ventricular function in chronic hemodialysis patients

There are limited data showing right ventricular preload increase due to high-flow arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). This cross-sectional study investigated whether high AVF flow had an impact on right ventricular function in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Sixty-four patients aged between 18 and 85 years who were on routine hemodialysis with >2 hemodialysis sessions per week for at least 3 months via an AVF were studied. Patients with inadequate flow fistulas, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of pulmonary embolism, primary pulmonary hypertension, severe mitral, aortic or pulmonary regurgitation, and/or stenosis were excluded. After an initial evaluation, 44 patients (mean age: 58.50 ± 16.84, male:female = 23:21) were considered eligible. Right ventricular function was assessed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). AVF blood flow was measured with duplex ultrasound. There were 15 patients (34.1%) with a TAPSE of <16 mm. AVF blood flow was significantly higher in patients with impaired versus normal right ventricular function (1631.53 ± 738.17 vs. 1060.55 ± 539.92 min/ml, respectively, P = 0.003). Low left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR]: 1.15, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.007-1.334, P = 0.04), high interventricular septum thickness (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.104-2.464, P = 0.01), and high AVF blood flow (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 1.000-1.003, P = 0.03) were independent predictors of impaired right ventricular function. In addition to known risk factors that predominantly increase right ventricular afterload, excessive AVF blood flow was found to be independently associated with impaired right ventricular function, possibly by increasing right ventricular preload.

Plication for the Treatment of a Radio-Cephalic Fistula with Ulnar Artery Steal

Purpose

Generally the steal syndrome occurs in proximal arterial-venous fistulas and only exceptionally with distal vascular access because of the high number of arteries supplying the hand. We describe a rare case of steal syndrome of a proximalized distal radio-cephalic fistula stealing from both the radial and ulnar artery through the palmar arch.

Methods

An 86 year old man was admitted because of a cyanotic, swollen left hand with trophic lesions at the third finger. He had a latero-terminal radio-cephalic fistula performed in 2006 with subsequent proximalization performed four years later after failure of the first one. Duplex ultrasound examination showed a high flow within the fistula (2080 mL/min) and a retrograde perfusion of the radial artery from the ulnar artery through the palmar arch and an angiography excluded stenosis along the radial artery.

Results

We treated the steal syndrome through a plication technique that was performed with careful flow variations measurement, under duplex evaluation, during the surgical procedure. That procedure was effective to maintain the fistula flow and obtain the symptoms relief. The patient was evaluated the day after the intervention and after 10 weeks. The clinical examination highlighted the resolution of hand ischemia. The Duplex Ultrasound examination showed a lower flow within the fistula (1060 mL/min) and a retrograde perfusion of the radial artery from the ulnar artery through the palmar arch with a three-phase flow. Dialysis access from the fistula was never interrupted from immediately after surgery to the present date.

Conclusions

Plication is an effective technique for treatment of steal syndrome requiring a short operative time and it is related to satisfying post-operative results

One-Year Efficacy of the RUDI Technique for Flow Reduction in High-Flow Autologous Brachial Artery-Based Hemodialysis Vascular Access

Purpose

Flow reduction is advised in hemodialysis (HD) patients with a high-flow (>2 L/min) arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The revision using distal inflow (RUDI) technique is based on the premise that access flow is attenuated once inflow is provided by a smaller caliber forearm artery. Aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of RUDI during a 1-year follow-up.

Methods

All HD patients undergoing a RUDI operation using a greater saphenous vein (GSV) or a basilic vein (BaV) interposition for a high-flow access (HFA, >2 L/min) during a 3.5-year time period were included. Serial access flow, percentage of freedom from recurrent high flow and complications were determined.

Results

A total of 19 HFA patients were studied (11 males, age 55 ± 3 years). All AVFs were brachial artery based (brachiocephalic, n = 14; brachiobasilic, n = 5). RUDI immediately reduced access flow by almost 2 L/min (3,080 ± 200 to 1,170 ± 160 mL/min (p = 0.001)). Access flows at 1, 6 and 12 months were 1,150 ± 160, 1,460 ± 200 and 1,580 ± 260 mL/min, respectively. Postoperative complications included insufficient flow reduction (n = 1, BaV) and occlusion requiring revision (n = 1, GSV). Recurrent HFA occurred three times (n = 2 BaV, n = 1 GSV). Access flows were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the BaV group compared to the GSV group.

Conclusions

RUDI effectively reduces access flow in a brachial artery-based high-flow HD vascular access. A flow-reducing effect is sustained at 1-year follow-up in most patients. GSV is preferred as an interposition graft compared to a BaV.

Surgical Techniques for Haemodialysis Access-Induced Distal Ischaemia

Purpose

Haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI) is a significant complication of vascular access creation, and has traditionally been difficult to manage without loss of access. Current treatment options include ligation, banding, distal revascularisation with interval ligation (DRIL), proximalisation of the arterial inflow (PAI) and revision using distal flow (RUDI). The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of the different surgical techniques in the treatment of HAIDI.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing surgical techniques in the treatment of HAIDI in accordance with PRISMA. The primary outcome for the study was symptomatic relief for each technique, defined within each study. Secondary outcomes included comparison of early thrombosis rates following each different procedure.

Results

Following strict inclusion/exclusion criteria by two reviewers, twenty-seven studies of surgical interventions were included and divided into subgroups for banding, DRIL, PAI and RUDI procedures. Both DRIL and banding procedures were found to have high rates of symptomatic relief. In addition, the DRIL has a significantly lower rate of early thrombosis than banding although the more recent papers seem to suggest that early thrombosis is less of a problem in banding. PAI and RUDI showed some promise but there were too few studies to be able to make any clear conclusions.

Conclusions

All four procedures have high success rate in relieving ischaemic symptoms with the DRIL procedure having a significantly better vascular access patency rate than other techniques, although further well designed studies are required to compare all four surgical techniques.

Outcomes of Blood Flow Suppression Methods of Treating High Flow Access in Hemodialysis Patients with Arteriovenous Fistula

Purpose

A high flow access (HFA) may cause heart failure in patients with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with poor prognosis. There are a variety of blood flow suppression techniques for treating HFA; however, the therapeutic outcome is still unclear.

Methods

The following three different blood flow suppression methods were performed on 74 patients with HFA: proximal artery banding with distal artery ligation (A-ban with A-lig: 12 cases); shunt vein banding (V-ban: 37 cases); and anastoplasty (Ana: 25 cases).

Results

There were no differences in the sex or mean age or duration of HD between the treatment groups. The A-ban with A-lig method was mainly selected for patients with a distal AVF and the anastoplasty method was selected most often for patients with a cubital AVF. The techniques were equally effective in reducing flow volume (FV) and the FV/cardiac output ratio (Flow/CO) to target levels, and clinical symptoms improved in all patients. The rates of HFA recurrence and AVF occlusion were significantly higher in the V-ban group (18.9% and 24.3%, respectively). A small proportion of patients in each treatment group developed a postoperative infection.

Conclusions

Each method proved to be an effective means of treating HFA. The choice of surgical method should be informed by the type of vascular access; however, the A-ban with A-lig and Ana methods appear to achieve clinically significant reductions in FV and have lower rates of HFA recurrence and AVF occlusion.

Effectiveness of surgical banding for high flow in brachial artery-based hemodialysis vascular access

OBJECTIVE

Autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis (HD) access may develop high flow (>2 L/min) over time. Reducing flow volume of a high-flow access (HFA) using a surgical banding technique has been reported to be successful in the short-term. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of banding in HFAs in terms of freedom from recurrence of high flow during a 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

All HD patients undergoing surgical banding of an HFA during an 8-year period in three hospitals were retrospectively studied. Access flow data, freedom of recurrent high flow, and complications were analyzed during a 12-month postoperative observation period.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients (30 males; age, 51 ± 2 years) were available for analysis. Banding was performed 30 ± 6 months after arteriovenous access construction. Most of the HFA patients (56%) required medication for hypertension, but diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial obstructive disease were seldom observed (6% and 12%, respectively). Most HFAs (96%) were brachial artery-based fistulas (brachiocephalic: 56%, basilic vein transposition: 40%, radiocephalic: 4%). Banding initially reduced access flow by >50% (3070 ± 95 vs 1490 ± 105 mL/min, P < .001). Recurrent high flow (>2 L/min) developed in 52% of the patients during the observation period. Young age (45 ± 3 vs 57 ± 3 years; P = .02) and an access flow >1 L/min immediately after banding (P = .03) were risk factors for recurrent high flow.

CONCLUSIONS

An immediate postbanding access flow >1 L/min and young age are risk factors for recurrent high flow in a banded brachial artery-based HD access during a 1-year follow-up.

Consider use of a collateral venous circuit before abandoning the arteriovenous fistula--the experience of a complex vascular access case

We describe a 65-year-old woman with diabetes on hemodialysis maintenance, with a number of complications associated with high-flow arteriovenous fistula (AVF, anastomosis between brachial artery and medial vein of the forearm) requiring an extended diagnostic and individual approach. The patient was admitted to our hospital because of pain, edema of the limb, hand ischemia, and infection caused by steal syndrome. To reduce fistula flow, banding of the proximal cephalic vein was performed. Simultaneously because of necrosis, amputation of the fifth finger was necessary. Following this procedure, the cephalic vein on the arm thrombosed. The fistula was patent through the collateral circuit, which was diagnosed in detail during the late course. A long course of antibiotics and sessions in a hyperbaric chamber allowed limb rescue. Single-needle dialysis was carried out because of problems in finding an appropriate second place. After an episode of bleeding from the puncture site caused by ulceration, we were forced to search for an alternative needling point. On the basis of ultrasound scans, an anatomic schema of the blood circuit was created. The fistula demonstrated flow from the brachial artery resulting in retrograde flow in the section of the cephalic vein distal to the anastomosis in the upper forearm. This was then seen to drain in an antegrade direction via the median vein of the forearm after the 2 vessels connected in the mid forearm. Using the diagram, 2 alternative places for needling were found and it allowed the adequate hemodialysis to be continued. Complex and complicated cases associated with native AVF could be resolved using simple diagnostic tools to preserve the fistula use for hemodialysis. Both clinical examination and ultrasound scan with the Doppler option appear to be valuable methods for finding the optimal cannulation place.

Systemic Effects of a High-Flow Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis

Purpose

Absolute treatment criteria for reducing the access volume of a high-flow access (HFA, access flow >2 L/min) are absent. Previous studies suggested that a HFA may influence the systemic circulation including blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR). The aim of this study was to determine these parameters after access clamping in hemodialysis patients undergoing flow-reducing access surgery.

Methods

Systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP) and HR in HFA patients undergoing flow-reducing surgery were measured intraoperatively before and after access clamping. Data were compared to values obtained in patients receiving surgery for severe hand ischemia due to an access (HAIDI, hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia).

Results

In 8 years, 34 patients underwent surgery for HFA (n=23) or HAIDI (n=11). Preoperative access flows in HFA were larger compared to HAIDI (3,026±147 vs 1,078±139 mL/min, respectively, p<0.001). Temporary clamping (15 sec) caused a 12±2 mm Hg increase in SBP (111±6 to 123±6 mm Hg, p<0.05) and a 6±1 mm Hg rise in DBP (57±4 to 63±5 mm Hg, p<0.05) in HFA patients. In contrast, SBP and DBP increases were not significant in HAIDI patients (+6±3 and +2±2 mm Hg, respectively, p=0.37). HR was modestly reduced in both groups following access clamping (–3±1 beats/min). The relationship between access flow volume and alterations in SBP best fitted a quadratic regression model, suggesting cardiovascular exhaustion with progressively higher access flows > 2-2.5 L/min.

Conclusions

HFA may influence systemic hemodynamics in some hemodialysis patients. The findings of this study may contribute to a tailored management of a high-flow fistula in this population.

High-output heart failure: how to define it, when to treat it, and how to treat it

Although hemodialysis patients who initiate and maintain a permanent form of dialysis vascular access have improved all-cause and cardiovascular survival compared with those who use catheters, the presence of an arteriovenous fistula has been shown to have a short-term, adverse effect on cardiac function. Through its effect as a left-to-right extracardiac shunt, the arteriovenous fistula can increase cardiac workload substantially, and, in certain patients, result in a high-output state and resultant heart failure over time. Here we review the mechanisms by which dialysis arteriovenous access may promote the development of high-output cardiac failure in end-stage renal disease patients, describe risk factors for and the diagnosis of high-output heart failure, and suggest management strategies for patients who develop high-output heart failure.

Side branch ligation for haemodialysis-access-induced distal ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

Chronic hand ischaemia is occasionally observed in haemodialysis patients with a brachiocephalic fistula using the Gracz technique. Open venous side branches of the access may contribute to lower peripheral perfusion pressures. This study reports on the effects of access side branch ligation (SBL) on ischaemia in patients with haemodialysis access induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI).

DESIGN, MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hand ischaemia was quantified using a published questionnaire (HIQ, minimal 0 points: no ischaemia, maximal 500: excruciating ischaemia). Finger pressures (P(dig), mmHg), digital brachial index (DBI) and access flow were measured before and after SBL.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were operated for grade 2-4 HAIDI during 7 years, and 12 underwent SBL (as single procedure n = 5, preceeding banding/DRIL n = 7). Hand ischaemia was attenuated after SBL only (n = 5, HIQ 216 ± 39 vs. 73 ± 26, P = 0.04). A 25% increase was observed in both P(dig) (n = 12, before SBL: 57 ± 8 mmHg, after: 72 ± 8 mmHg, P = 0.012) and DBI (before SBL: 0.49 ± 0.06, after: 0.61 ± 0.04, P = 0.006). Access flow did not change. All patients successfully resumed dialysis.

CONCLUSION

SBL may be effective as single or adjunctive surgical procedure in the treatment of HAIDI in the presence of a Gracz fistula.

Time of onset in haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia (HAIDI) is related to the access type

BACKGROUND

A small portion of haemodialysis patients develop hand ischaemia (HAIDI, haemodialysis access-induced distal ischaemia) in the presence of an arteriovenous access (AVA). It is unknown if the time of onset of ischaemia is related to the type of AVA. This review aims to investigate if a relationship is present between the type of AVA and the time of onset and intensity of HAIDI.

METHODS

Standard databases and reference lists of the pertinent literature were systematically searched. HAIDI was classified as 'acute' (<24 h after routine access construction), 'subacute' (within 1 month) or 'chronic' (>1 month). Location, type and follow-up of AVA were tabulated.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies reporting on surgically or percutaneously corrected HAIDI patients (n = 464) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Acute HAIDI strongly (88%) correlated with non-autogenous AVA. In contrast, chronic HAIDI was predominantly (91%) observed following autogenous AVA based on the cubital segment of the brachial artery. A simple clinical classification for chronic HAIDI guiding treatment strategies is proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand ischaemia occurring early after routine access surgery is usually related to grafts and not to autogenous access construction. If patients have several risk factors for acute hand ischaemia (diabetes), nephrologists and vascular surgeons may choose an autogenous AVA. A disadvantage of an autogenous access is its association with chronic hand ischaemia, particularly if constructed with a brachial artery.