A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body

Why Is Wnt/β-Catenin Not Yet Targeted in Routine Cancer Care?

Despite significant progress in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment, the still limited number of therapeutic options is an obstacle towards increasing the cancer cure rate. In recent years, many efforts were put forth to develop therapeutics that selectively target different components of the oncogenic Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. These include small molecule inhibitors, antibodies, and more recently, gene-based approaches. Although some of them showed promising outcomes in clinical trials, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is still not targeted in routine clinical practice for cancer management. As for most anticancer treatments, a critical limitation to the use of Wnt/β-catenin inhibitors is their therapeutic index, i.e., the difficulty of combining effective anticancer activity with acceptable toxicity. Protecting healthy tissues from the effects of Wnt/β-catenin inhibitors is a major issue due to the vital role of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in adult tissue homeostasis and regeneration. In this review, we provide an up-to-date summary of clinical trials on Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors, examine their anti-tumor activity and associated adverse events, and explore strategies under development to improve the benefit/risk profile of this therapeutic approach.

Dermoscopy and ultrosound monitoring actinic keratosis with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A case report and literature review

Actinic keratosis(AK) is a common premalignant skin lesion that can progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma(iSCC). Clinically, AK presents as reddish or brownish macules, papules, or hyperkeratotic plaques. AK cannot be reliably predicted whether it will transform into invasive carcinomas, so skin biopsy is currently a gold standard for identifying suspicious malignancy. Currently, there are non-invasive methods to help diagnose and determine the difference between AKs and iSCC. For example, dermoscopy and ultrasound can be very useful in diagnosing and monitoring skin diseases non-invasively. Therefore, we report a case of multiple facial AKs with poorly differentiated skin squamous cell carcinoma, which was diagnosed early through dermoscopy and ultrasound, and confirmed by histopathology.

Guidelines of care for the management of actinic keratosis

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratoses (AK) are rough scaly patches that arise on chronically ultraviolet-exposed skin and can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis examined the literature related to the management of AK to provide evidence-based recommendations for treatment. Grading, histologic classification, natural history, risk of progression, and dermatologic surveillance of AKs are also discussed.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Work Group conducted a systematic review to address 5 clinical questions on the management of AKs and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading clinical recommendations. Graded recommendations were voted on to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

Analysis of the evidence resulted in 18 recommendations.

LIMITATIONS

This analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time it was conducted. The pragmatic decision to limit the literature review to English language randomized trials may have excluded data published in other languages or limited identification of relevant long-term follow-up data.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations are made for using ultraviolet protection, topical imiquimod, topical 5-fluorouracil, and cryosurgery. Conditional recommendations are made for the use of photodynamic therapy and diclofenac for the treatment of AK, both individually and as part of combination therapy regimens.

Guidelines of care for the management of actinic keratosis: Executive summary

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratoses (AK) are rough scaly patches that arise on chronically ultraviolet-exposed skin and can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma. Treatment options for AK include topical medications, photodynamic therapy, cryosurgery, and laser ablation.

OBJECTIVE

This executive summary provides a synopsis of the 18 evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of AK detailed in the Guidelines of Care for the Management of Actinic Keratosis.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review to address 5 clinical questions on the management of AKs and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading clinical recommendations. Graded recommendations were voted on to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

Analysis of the evidence resulted in 18 recommendations, suggesting there are several effective treatments available for AK.

LIMITATIONS

The analysis informing the recommendations was based on the best available evidence at the time it was conducted. The results of future studies may necessitate a revision of current recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations are presented for using ultraviolet protection, topical imiquimod, topical 5-fluorouracil, and cryosurgery. Conditional recommendations are presented for the use of photodynamic therapy and diclofenac for the treatment of AK, both individually and as part of combination therapy regimens.

Identification of differentially expressed genes in actinic keratosis samples treated with ingenol mebutate gel

Actinic keratosis is a common skin disease that may progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma if left untreated. Ingenol mebutate has demonstrated efficacy in field treatment of actinic keratosis. However, molecular mechanisms on ingenol mebutate response are not yet fully understood. In this study, we evaluated the gene expression profiles of actinic keratosis lesions before and after treatment with ingenol mebutate using microarray technology. Actinic keratoses on face/scalp of 15 immunocompetent patients were identified and evaluated after treatment with topical ingenol mebutate gel 0.015%, applied once daily for 3 consecutive days. Diagnostic and clearance of lesions was determined by clinical, dermoscopic, and reflectance confocal microscopy criteria. Lesional and non-lesional skin biopsies were subjected to gene expression analysis profiled by Affymetrix microarray. Differentially expressed genes were identified, and enrichment analyses were performed using STRING database. At 8 weeks post-treatment, 60% of patients responded to ingenol mebutate therapy, achieving complete clearance in 40% of cases. A total of 128 differentially expressed genes were identified following treatment, and downregulated genes (114 of 128) revealed changes in pathways important to epidermal development, keratinocyte differentiation and cornification. In responder patients, 388 downregulated genes (of 450 differentially expressed genes) were also involved in development/differentiation of the epidermis, and immune system-related pathways, such as cytokine and interleukin signaling. Cluster analysis revealed two relevant clusters showing upregulated profile patterns in pre-treatment actinic keratoses of responders, as compared to non-responders. Again, differentially expressed genes were mainly associated with cornification, keratinization and keratinocyte differentiation. Overall, the present study provides insight into the gene expression profile of actinic keratoses after treatment with ingenol mebutate, as well as identification of genetic signatures that could predict treatment response.

Current therapies for actinic keratosis

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a very common skin disease caused by chronic sun damage, which in 75% of cases arises on chronically sun-exposed areas, such as face, scalp, neck, hands, and forearms. AKs must be considered an early squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) for their probable progression into invasive SCC. For this reason, all AK should be treated, and clinical follow-up is recommended. The aims of treatment are: (i) to clinically eradicate evident and subclinical lesions, (ii) to prevent their evolution into SCC, and (iii) to reduce the number of relapses. Among available treatments, it is possible to distinguish lesion-directed therapies and field-directed therapies. Lesion-directed treatments include: (i) cryotherapy; (ii) laser therapy; (iii) surgery; and (iv) curettage. Whereas, field-directed treatments are: (i) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); (ii) diclofenac 3% gel; (iii) chemical peeling; (iv) imiquimod; and (v) photodynamic therapy (PDT). Prevention plays an important role in the treatment of AKs, and it is based on the continuous use of sunscreen and protective clothing. This review shows different types of available treatments and describes the characteristics and benefits of each medication, underlining the best choice.

Field cancerization therapy with ingenol mebutate contributes to restoring skin-metabolism to normal-state in patients with actinic keratosis: a metabolomic analysis

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a skin premalignant lesion, which progresses into squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) if left untreated. Ingenol mebutate gel is approved for local treatment of non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic AK; it also has the potential to act as a field cancerization therapy to prevent the progression of AK to SCC. To gain better insights into the mechanisms of ingenol mebutate beyond the mere clinical assessment, we investigated, for the first time, the metabolome of skin tissues from patients with AK, before and after ingenol mebutate treatment, with high-resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The metabolomic profiles were compared with those of tissues from healthy volunteers. Overall, we identified a number of metabolites, the homeostasis of which became altered during the process of tumorigenesis from healthy skin to AK, and was restored, at least partially, by ingenol mebutate therapy. These metabolites may help to attain a better understanding of keratinocyte metabolism and to unmask the metabolic pathways related to cell proliferation. These results provide helpful information to identify biomarkers with prognostic and therapeutic significance in AK, and suggest that field cancerization therapy with ingenol mebutate may contribute to restore skin metabolism to a normal state in patients with AK.

Treatment of actinic keratoses and cancerization field of the face and scalp with 0.015% ingenol mebutate gel in Brazilian individuals: safety, tolerability and patients' perspectives

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) represents a risk of progression to squamous cell carcinoma. Ingenol mebutate gel is a novel therapeutic option for field-directed treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety, tolerability and patients' perspectives, related to the therapeutic success of managing AKs on the face and scalp with ingenol mebutate gel in Brazilian individuals.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective and descriptive study of 68 areas of actinic keratosis on the face and scalp treated with Ingenol mebutate gel involving a total of 37 patients. The drug was applied for three consecutive days on an area of of 25 cm2 and documentation was performed on baseline and days 4, 8, 15, 60 and 180. On day 4, the composite local skin reaction score was calculated. At the end, a questionnaire was applied to evaluate patients' perspectives about the treatment.

RESULTS

Adherence was 100%, no serious adverse events were recorded and the mean composite local skin reaction score (standard deviation) was 8.61±4.22. The treatment was considered optimum by 75.68% of the patients.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Calculation of composite local skin reaction score performed only on the fourth day.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ingenol mebutate gel was considered safe and tolerable in Brazilian subjects. Patients had a maximum adherence rate and a great improvement in self-esteem. The results of this research reproduce the findings of the literature.

Clinical utility of ingenol mebutate in the management of actinic keratosis: perspectives from clinical practice

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are epidermal cutaneous neoplasia observed predominantly in middle-aged and older subjects with mainly photo type I and photo type II on sun-exposed surfaces as a result of DNA damage. AKs have historically been characterized as being "precancerous"; however, now it is considered by many authors a carcinoma in situ that can persist or progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with metastatic potential. Despite the advances in the recognition of typical clinic, dermoscopic and histologic patterns, currently it is not yet possible to predict which AKs will progress to SCC. For this reason, early diagnosis and effective therapy are recommended based on cost/risk/benefit analysis. Current treatment consists of lesion-directed or field-directed therapies or a combination of both. Among the topical field therapies, ingenol mebutate stands out for its therapeutic efficacy, both as directed lesion therapy and as field directed therapy. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the utility of ingenol mebutate in the management of AK in daily clinical practice and to highlight data from real world in order to confirm evidence from pivotal studies. In order to explore clinical data from real world, PubMed searches were performed with the search terms "clinical data ingenol mebutate" and "real world ingenol mebutate". The hits were examined for relevant articles using defaults criteria. The timeframe for the sample search started from the first publication on this topic in 2008 up to now. A total of 23 articles were found using the keywords specified above. The overview points out a low number of real-life studies on the effectiveness and tolerability of this novel treatment due to short period of clinical experience for its recent approval. Further real-life studies are required in order to better identify the efficacy, safety and adherence of the drug on a larger population.

A Prospective Pilot Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Therapy with Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% for Actinic Keratosis on an Expanded Area of the Chest

BACKGROUND: Ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% once daily for two consecutive days provides high clearance rates for actinic keratosis on a 25cm² area of the chest. However, it may cause intense local skin responses. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a lower dose of ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% could clear actinic keratosis on the chest with acceptable tolerability and a possible beneficial effect on photodamage and cosmesis. DESIGN: This was a noncomparative, open-label study (NCT02446223). PARTICIPANTS: In total, 21 subjects were enrolled, and 20 completed the study. MEASUREMENTS: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% was applied once daily for three consecutive days to a contiguous area of the chest less than 100cm² containing four or more actinic keratoses. RESULTS: the actinic keratosis lesion count decreased by an average of 76 percent compared with baseline. signs of photoaging were reduced significantly at the end of the study, with greater than 60 percent of the subjects reporting moderate or complete satisfaction with skin improvement. Local skin responses generally resolved within two weeks of treatment. there were no adverse reactions. LIMITATIONS: this was a noncomparative, open-label study that evaluated a relatively small number of subjects. CONCLUSION: ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% applied to a less than 100cm² area of the chest once daily for three consecutive days reduced the actinic keratosis count and significantly improved signs of photoaging with high patient satisfaction and good tolerability.

[What's new in oncodermatology in 2015?]

Oncodermatology is the topic of constant innovation since 5 years. These innovations have drammatically modified the prognostic of skin cancers and induced a change in the paradigm that drives the whole oncology. Once again in 2015, melanoma is the key topic of scientific communication, with promising results. However, unmet clinical needs must be kept in light. Some diseases, such as squamous cell carcinoma or cutaneous lymphoma remain poorly evaluated. This article was designed as a review of litterature. All keywords of oncodermatology were searched in the main journals of dermatology, oncology and internal medicine. Despite methodologic restrictions, the number of articles imposed a choice based on opinion. The final goal was to transmit author's enthousiasm and the most important results.

Safety and tolerability of ingenol mebutate in the treatment of actinic keratosis

INTRODUCTION

Ingenol mebutate is a topical therapeutic agent for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). It has a novel mode of action and has shown comparable efficacy to other topical field therapies. This article summarizes and provides perspective on the safety profile of ingenol mebutate from clinical studies of this agent.

AREAS COVERED

The unique mechanism of action of ingenol mebutate, the basis for a rapid clinical effect, is outlined. Safety and tolerability data, including mean composite local skin response (LSR) scores, type of LSR, and adverse events from a range of clinical studies both in healthy volunteers and patients with AK, are reviewed. The safety profile of ingenol mebutate is then compared with other agents used to treat AK lesions.

EXPERT OPINION

Ingenol mebutate has a dosing period of 2 - 3 days, which is short compared with other field therapies, and there is no evidence of systemic absorption. The fact that most of the LSRs observed are mild to moderate in intensity and transient, with a majority resolved within 2 weeks, makes for a favorable safety profile. Ingenol mebutate enhances the armamentarium available to the dermatologist for the treatment of AK.