1
|
Remoli G, Tariciotti L, Remore LG, Palmisciano P, Sciancalepore F, Canevelli M, Lacorte E, Da Re F, Bruno G, Ferrarese C, Appollonio I, Locatelli M, Vanacore N. An updated overview of recent and ongoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) trials in patients with dementia: a systematic review. Neurol Sci 2023; 44:3395-3427. [PMID: 37204563 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06821-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia affects more than 55 million people worldwide. Several technologies have been developed to slow cognitive decline: deep brain stimulation (DBS) of network targets in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) have been recently investigated. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to review the characteristics of the populations, protocols, and outcomes of patients with dementia enrolled in clinical trials investigating the feasibility and efficacy of DBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search of all registered RCTs was performed on Clinicaltrials.gov and EudraCT, while a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and APA PsycInfo to identify published trials. RESULTS The literature search yielded 2122 records, and the clinical trial search 15 records. Overall, 17 studies were included. Two of 17 studies were open-label studies reporting no NCT/EUCT code and were analysed separately. Of 12 studies investigating the role of DBS in AD, we included 5 published RCTs, 2 unregistered open-label (OL) studies, 3 recruiting studies, and 2 unpublished trials with no evidence of completion. The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate-high. Our review showed significant heterogeneity in the recruited populations regarding age, disease severity, informed consent availability, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. Notably, the standard mean of overall severe adverse events was moderately high (SAEs: 9.10 ± 7.10%). CONCLUSION The population investigated is small and heterogeneous, published results from clinical trials are under-represented, severe adverse events not negligible, and cognitive outcomes uncertain. Overall, the validity of these studies requires confirmation based on forthcoming higher-quality clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Remoli
- Neurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMI), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Ward, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Leonardo Tariciotti
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Luigi Gianmaria Remore
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Palmisciano
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Francesco Sciancalepore
- National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Canevelli
- National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Rome "La Sapienza,", Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Lacorte
- National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvio Da Re
- Neurology Ward, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Bruno
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Rome "La Sapienza,", Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Ferrarese
- Neurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMI), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Ward, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Ildebrando Appollonio
- Neurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMI), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Ward, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Marco Locatelli
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Vanacore
- National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wehmeyer L, Schüller T, Kiess J, Heiden P, Visser-Vandewalle V, Baldermann JC, Andrade P. Target-Specific Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol 2021; 12:769275. [PMID: 34744993 PMCID: PMC8563609 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.769275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Extended research has pointed to the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treatment of patients with treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). The four most commonly used DBS targets for TS include the centromedian nucleus-nucleus ventrooralis internus (CM-Voi) and the centromedian nucleus-parafascicular (CM-Pf) complexes of the thalamus, and the posteroventrolateral (pvIGPi) and the anteromedial portion of the globus pallidus internus (amGPi). Differences and commonalities between those targets need to be compared systematically. Objective: Therefore, we evaluated whether DBS is effective in reducing TS symptoms and target-specific differences. Methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible literature was used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: In total, 65 studies with 376 patients were included. Overall, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) scores were reduced by more than 50 in 69% of the patients. DBS also resulted in significant reductions of secondary outcome measures, including the total YGTSS, modified Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale (mRVRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), and Becks Depression Inventory (BDI). All targets resulted in significant reductions of YGTSS scores and, with the exception of the CM-Pf, also in reduced YBOCS scores. Interestingly, DBS of pallidal targets showed increased YGTSS and YBOCS reductions compared to thalamic targets. Also, the meta-analysis including six randomized controlled and double-blinded trials demonstrated clinical efficacy of DBS for TS, that remained significant for GPi but not thalamic stimulation in two separate meta-analyses. Conclusion: We conclude that DBS is a clinically effective treatment option for patients with treatment-refractory TS, with all targets showing comparable improvement rates. Future research might focus on personalized and symptom-specific target selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Wehmeyer
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany,*Correspondence: Laura Wehmeyer
| | - Thomas Schüller
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jana Kiess
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Petra Heiden
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juan Carlos Baldermann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pablo Andrade
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|