Springs Produce Favorable Morphologic Outcomes Relative to H-Craniectomy According to a Two-Center Comparison of Matched Cases

BACKGROUND

Sagittal synostosis is the most common type of premature suture closure, and many surgical techniques are used to correct scaphocephalic skull shape. Given the rarity of direct comparisons of different surgical techniques for correcting craniosynostosis, this study compared outcomes of craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy for nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis.

METHODS

Comparisons were performed using available preoperative and postoperative imaging and follow-up data from the 2 craniofacial national referral centers in Sweden, which perform 2 different surgical techniques: craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy (the Renier technique). The study included 23 pairs of patients matched for sex, preoperative cephalic index, and age. Cephalic index, total intracranial volume (ICV), and partial ICV were measured before surgery and at 3 years of age, with volume measurements compared against those of preoperative and postoperative controls. Perioperative data included operation time, blood loss, volume of transfused blood, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Craniotomy combined with springs resulted in less bleeding and lower transfusion rates than H-craniectomy. Although the spring technique requires 2 operations, the mean total operation time was similar for the methods. Of the 3 complications that occurred in the group treated with springs, 2 were spring-related. The compiled analysis of changes in cephalic index and partial volume distribution revealed that craniotomy combined with springs resulted in superior morphologic correction.

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that craniotomy combined with springs normalized cranial morphology to a greater extent than H-craniectomy based on changes in cephalic index and total and partial ICVs over time.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Tranexamic acid decreases transfusion requirements during the modified pi-plasty procedure for sagittal craniosynostosis

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) administration in decreasing transfusion needs in patients undergoing modified pi-plasty. A retrospective study was performed using a population of 59 patients who underwent modified pi-plasty, wherein patients who received TXA during surgery (study group, n = 26) were compared with patients who did not receive TXA (control group, n = 33). The primary study endpoints were intraoperative red blood cell substitution (%), postoperative red blood cell substitution (%), total red blood cell substitution (%), and hematocrit variation. Perioperative administration of TXA significantly decreased the total red blood cell substitution (62.90% vs 86.70%; p = 0.002) and resulted in a higher postoperative hematocrit (29.47% vs 27.53%; p = 0.060). In conclusion, perioperative administration of TXA significantly decreased blood transfusion requirements in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis undergoing modified pi-plasty.

Sagittal Craniosynostosis: Treatment and Outcomes According to Age at Intervention

The purpose of this study is to describe the treatment strategies and outcomes of nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis based on the patient's age at intervention. Studies from MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for patients with nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies with follow-up of at least 12 months, minimum of 25 patients per cohort, and first-time surgical intervention. The risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of intervention tool [Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I)] was applied. A total of 49 manuscripts with 3316 patients met criteria. Articles were categorized based on age at intervention; 0 to 6, older than 6 to 12, and older than 12 months. Fifteen of the manuscripts described interventions in more than 1 age group. From the 49 articles, 39 (n=2141) included patients 0 to 6 months old, 15 (n=669) discussed patients older than 6 to 12 months old, and 9 (n=506) evaluated patients older than 12 months old. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 144 months. Over 8 types of open surgical techniques were identified and 5 different minimally invasive procedures were described. Minimally invasive procedures were exclusively seen in the youngest patient cohort, while open cranial vault reconstructions were often seen in the 2 older cohorts. Endoscopic surgery and open conservative procedures are indicated for younger patients, while complex open cranial vault reconstructions are common in older patients. However, there is no consensus on one approach over the other. Even with the analysis of this review, we cannot factor a strong conclusion on a specific technique.

A multi-institutional survey on calvarial vault remodeling techniques for sagittal synostosis and outcomes analysis for patients treated at 12 months and older

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis is challenging in older patients. This study aimed to assess the effect of increasing age on open surgical technique selection and patient outcomes using the multi-institutional Synostosis Research Group (SynRG) collaboration.

METHODS

Surgeons in SynRG were surveyed for key influences on their preferred open calvarial vault remodeling techniques at various patient ages: < 6, 6-12, and > 12 months. The SynRG database was then queried for open repairs of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis performed for patients older than 12 months of age. Perioperative measures, complications, and preoperative and postoperative cephalic indices were reviewed.

RESULTS

All surgeons preferred to treat patients at an earlier age, and most (89%) believed that less-optimal outcomes were achieved at ages older than 12 months. The modified pi procedure was the dominant technique in those younger than 12 months, while more involved open surgical techniques were performed for older patients, with a wide variety of open calvarial vault remodeling techniques used. Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria, with a mean (± SD) age at surgery of 29 ± 16 months. Eleven patients underwent parietal reshaping, 10 parietal-occipital switch, 9 clamshell craniotomy, 7 geometric parietal expansion, 6 modified pi procedure, and 1 parietal distraction. There were no readmissions, complications, or mortality within 30 days postoperatively. Patients' cephalic indices improved a mean of 6.4% ± 4.0%, with a mean postoperative cephalic index of 74.2% ± 4.9%. Differences in postoperative cephalic index (p < 0.04) and hospital length of stay (p = 0.01) were significant between technique cohorts. Post hoc Tukey-Kramer analysis identified the parietal reshaping technique as being significantly associated with a reduced hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age is an important driver in technique selection, with surgeons selecting a more involved calvarial vault remodeling technique in older children. A variety of surgical techniques were analyzed, with the parietal reshaping technique being significantly associated with reduced length of stay; however, multiple perioperative factors may be contributory and require further analysis. When performed at high-volume centers by experienced pediatric neurosurgeons and craniofacial surgeons, open calvarial vault techniques can be a safe method for treating sagittal craniosynostosis in older children.

Comparison of safety outcomes between bi-coronal and direct approaches for device removal in patients treated with distraction osteogenesis for craniosynostosis

The study aimed at comparing the safety outcomes between conventional bicoronal and direct method in device removal after cranial distraction in the treatment of craniosynostosis. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with distraction osteogenesis to expand intracranial volume in the anteroposterior direction. Preoperative patient demographics, distraction protocols, and perioperative outcomes (operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative fluid volume, lowest hematocrit during surgery, transfusion, hospital stay, drain, postoperative complication) were collected and analyzed with the independent samples t-test. Twenty-four patients were included in the study (15 in the conventional and 9 in the direct approach group). The mean duration of surgery and intraoperative fluid volume were significantly shorter (114.56 ± 36.91 min vs. 177.20 ± 47.00 min, p = 0.003) and less (241.88 ± 194.07 ml vs. 624.00 ± 524.92 ml, p = 0.026), respectively in the direct group than in the conventional. No patients were transfused intraoperatively and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) postoperatively in the direct group. The mean intraoperative and total transfusion volumes were significantly greater in the conventional group (p = 0.004, 0.045, respectively). There were no significant differences in other safety outcomes. No postoperative wound complications were reported. The findings of this study indicated that the direct approach for distraction device removal in children with craniosynostosis appears to be safer than the conventional approach owing to the reduced operation time, intraoperative transfusion requirements, and ICU stay.

Spring-mediated cranioplasty versus endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) and spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) are two minimally invasive techniques for treating sagittal craniosynostosis in early infancy. Data comparing the perioperative outcomes of these two techniques are sparse. Here, the authors hypothesized that outcomes would be similar between patients undergoing SMC and those undergoing ESC and conducted a study using the multicenter Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry (PCSPR).

METHODS

The PCSPR was queried for infants under the age of 6 months who had undergone SMC or ESC for sagittal synostosis. SMC patients were propensity score matched 1:2 with ESC patients on age and weight. Primary outcomes were transfusion-free hospital course, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital length of stay (HLOS). The authors also obtained data points regarding spring removal. Comparisons of outcomes between matched groups were performed with multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

The query returned data from 676 infants who had undergone procedures from June 2012 through September 2019, comprising 580 ESC infants from 32 centers and 96 SMC infants from 5 centers. Ninety-six SMC patients were matched to 192 ESC patients. There was no difference in transfusion-free hospital course between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.45-1.35). SMC patients were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (aOR 7.50, 95% CI 3.75-14.99) and had longer ICU LOSs (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.37-1.48) and HLOSs (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17-1.39).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study of ESC and SMC, the authors found similar transfusion-free hospital courses; however, SMC infants had longer ICU LOSs and HLOSs. A trial comparing longer-term outcomes in SMC versus ESC would further define the roles of these two approaches in the management of sagittal craniosynostosis.

Management of sagittal synostosis in the Synostosis Research Group: baseline data and early outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Sagittal synostosis is the most common form of isolated craniosynostosis. Although some centers have reported extensive experience with this condition, most reports have focused on a single center. In 2017, the Synostosis Research Group (SynRG), a multicenter collaborative network, was formed to study craniosynostosis. Here, the authors report their early experience with treating sagittal synostosis in the network. The goals were to describe practice patterns, identify variations, and generate hypotheses for future research.

METHODS

All patients with a clinical diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis who presented to a SynRG center between March 1, 2017, and October 31, 2019, were included. Follow-up information through October 31, 2020, was included. Data extracted from the prospectively maintained SynRG registry included baseline parameters, surgical adjuncts and techniques, complications prior to discharge, and indications for reoperation. Data analysis was descriptive, using frequencies for categorical variables and means and medians for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Two hundred five patients had treatment for sagittal synostosis at 5 different sites. One hundred twenty-six patients were treated with strip craniectomy and 79 patients with total cranial vault remodeling. The most common strip craniectomy was wide craniectomy with parietal wedge osteotomies (44%), and the most common cranial vault remodeling procedure was total vault remodeling without forehead remodeling (63%). Preoperative mean cephalic indices (CIs) were similar between treatment groups: 0.69 for strip craniectomy and 0.68 for cranial vault remodeling. Thirteen percent of patients had other health problems. In the cranial vault cohort, 81% of patients who received tranexamic acid required a transfusion compared with 94% of patients who did not receive tranexamic acid. The rates of complication were low in all treatment groups. Five patients (2%) had an unintended reoperation. The mean change in CI was 0.09 for strip craniectomy and 0.06 for cranial vault remodeling; wide craniectomy resulted in a greater change in CI in the strip craniectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline severity of scaphocephaly was similar across procedures and sites. Treatment methods varied, but cranial vault remodeling and strip craniectomy both resulted in satisfactory postoperative CIs. Use of tranexamic acid may reduce the need for transfusion in cranial vault cases. The wide craniectomy technique for strip craniectomy seemed to be associated with change in CI. Both findings seem amenable to testing in a randomized controlled trial.

Endoscopic Versus Open Total Vault Reconstruction of Sagittal Craniosynostosis

: Sagittal craniosynostosis is the most common form of congenital cranial deformity. Surgical interventions are performed either open or endoscopic. Advancements in minimally invasive surgery have enabled the development of the endoscopic suturectomy technique. This is contrasted to the traditional open cranial vault reconstruction. There is a paucity of data comparing the head shape changes from both techniques. This study aims to compare the morphological outcome of endoscopic suturectomy versus total cranial vault reconstruction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study involving 55 cases of sagittal craniosynostosis, 37 of which has open total cranial vault reconstruction and 18 had endoscopic suturectomy procedure. Preoperative and postoperative 3D photographs of both groups were analyzed and compared. The change in correction between preoperative and postoperative state was measured against a crowd-driven standard for acceptable head shape.

RESULTS

Total cranial vault had higher percentage change between pre and postoperative cranial index than endoscopic suturectomy (14.7% versus 7.7%, P = 0.003). However, both techniques were able to achieve the minimum standard of 70% correction (TCV 107.5%, ES 100.4%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Total cranial vault and endoscopic suturectomy are effective in correcting scaphocephaly among children with sagittal craniosynostosis. Additionally, both techniques are able to achieve a percentage correction that exceeds the 70% benchmark established by the lay public.

Visualization of skull remodeling and re-ossification after reconstructive surgery and mosaic-like cranioplasty in sagittal synostosis and deformational brachycephaly1

INTRODUCTION

Extended vertex craniectomy in sagittal synostosis (SS) and transposition craniectomy in severe deformational brachycephaly (DB) combined with mosaic-like cranioplasty (M-LC) have been performed in 17 and 24 infants from 2001 to 2003. The hitherto not well-known mechanisms of remodeling and effectiveness of M-LC is assessed by X-ray and anthropometry.

METHODS

Follow-ups included skull radiograms preoperatively and 3 and 15 months postoperatively, which were analyzed by craniometry according to Haas, long-term anthropometry, and clinical follow-up till mean age of 7.6 and 7.4 years. Analysis included the following: time course of cephalic indexes (CI), sizes of distances (breadth, length, height) and modulus, and mean deviation of distances and modulus from the normal age- and sex-dependent values; evaluation of re-ossification of the operative defects covered by M-L C.

RESULTS

CI in SS is normalized in early follow-up with stabilization thereafter; CI of DB is gradually normalized till late follow-up. Remodeling occurs in both disorders by active and passive mechanisms: increased growth of distances with preoperative minus and decreased growth of distances with surplus. The latter mechanism adds more to the postoperative remodeling. M-LC leads to concentric and final complete re-ossification of the defects.

DISCUSSION

Significant remodeling of the skull vault is observed in both disorders by the demonstrated time course and mechanisms. M-LC does not hinder early remodeling and guarantees re-ossification of the defects.