A myristylated form of the sea oncoprotein can transform chicken embryo fibroblasts

Scaffolding protein Gab2 mediates fibroblast transformation by the SEA tyrosine kinase

Transformation of fibroblasts by V-SEA involves activation of the ERK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways. Effector proteins that are key mediators of the ERK and PI3K pathways, namely Grb2, the tyrosine phosphatase, SHP2 and PI3K, interact with the two phosphotyrosines found in the bidentate motif in the carboxy-terminal region of V-SEA. Genetic analysis demonstrated that while Y557 was a primary binding site and thus activator of the PI3K-Akt pathway, Y564 also contributed to the activation of this pathway. Y564 was located within a Grb2-binding motif, this raised the possibility that a protein that associated with Grb2 might be important for this PI3K activation. The scaffolding proteins Gab1 and/or Gab2 were candidates for this role. In this report, we demonstrate that V-SEA preferentially interacts with Gab2. Furthermore by using Gab2 null fibroblasts, we demonstrate that Gab2 is essential for fibroblast transformation by V-SEA. Using mutant forms of Gab2, we show that activation of the PI3K-Akt pathway via Gab2 is required for V-SEA-induced transformation. However, efficient fibroblast transformation also requires the SHP2 interaction site on Gab2.

Primary, self-renewing erythroid progenitors develop through activation of both tyrosine kinase and steroid hormone receptors

BACKGROUND

Self renewal in the hematopoietic system is thought to be restricted to a class of pluripotent stem cells. The capacity of cells with the properties of committed progenitors to self renew in many leukemias is thought to be an abnormal property resulting from the mutations responsible for leukemic transformation. It is not known how cells that can self-renew differ from cells that cannot. The notion that only pluripotent stem cells self renew has recently been challenged: normal committed erythroid progenitors capable of sustained self renewal have been described. These cells, called SCF/TGF alpha progenitors, co-express the c-Kit receptor tyrosine kinase and c-ErbB, the avian receptor for epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor (TGF) alpha, and they undergo continuous self renewal in response to TGF alpha and estradiol. In contrast, common erythroid progenitors (termed SCF progenitors) express only c-Kit and undergo a limited number of cell divisions in response to the c-Kit ligand, stem cell factor (SCF). Both types of progenitor faithfully reproduce terminal erythroid differentiation in vitro when exposed to differentiation factors. Here, we have investigated the developmental origin of these two classes of self-renewing erythroid progenitors.

RESULTS

We show that SCF progenitors can develop into SCF/TGF alpha progenitors. This developmental conversion requires 10-14 days and is accompanied by a gradual up-regulation of bioactive TGF alpha receptor. Using sera depleted of endogenous growth factors, we demonstrate that the development of SCF progenitors into SCF/TGF alpha progenitors absolutely requires the simultaneous presence of SCF, TGF alpha and estradiol, and is strongly enhanced by an unknown activity in chicken serum.

CONCLUSIONS

SCF progenitors can be induced to develop into self-renewing SCF/TGF alpha progenitors. The development of self renewal is triggered by specific combinations of growth factors and hormones. This has important implications for understanding leukemogenesis, as the self renewal of leukemic cells may reflect the normal potential of certain committed progenitor cells and not, as has been thought, a unique abnormal property of leukemic cells.

Self-renewal and differentiation of normal avian erythroid progenitor cells: regulatory roles of the TGF alpha/c-ErbB and SCF/c-kit receptors

The c-kit proto-oncogene product is a major regulator of early hematopoiesis in mice. We show here that the avian c-Kit protein, together with the c-erbB protooncogene product, regulates self-renewal and differentiation in two types of normal chick erythroid progenitors. A relatively frequent progenitor expressing only c-Kit transiently proliferated in response to avian c-Kit ligand (stem cell factor [SCF]). A second, rare progenitor coexpressed c-Kit and c-ErbB and was induced to long-term self-renewal by SCF or transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha), a c-ErbB ligand. In the absence of SFC or TGF alpha, both progenitors underwent erythropoietin (Epo)-dependent terminal differentiation with indistinguishable kinetics. Interestingly, Epo induced differentiation in the SCF progenitors even when SCF was present. In contrast, the c-ErbB-expressing, TGF alpha-induced progenitors continued to self-renew when treated with Epo plus the growth factors SCF, TGF alpha, or both. Expression of c-ErbB thus may be a dominant determinant for the sustained self-renewal of committed erythroid progenitors.

The amino-terminal 14 amino acids of v-src can functionally replace the extracellular and transmembrane domains of v-erbB

The retroviral oncogene v-erbB encodes a truncated form of the receptor for epidermal growth factor, an integral membrane protein-tyrosine kinase. By contrast, the oncogene v-src encodes a protein-tyrosine kinase that is a peripheral membrane protein. The morphologies and spectra of cells transformed by these two oncogenes differ. In an effort to identify the functional determinant(s) of these differences, we constructed and tested first deletion mutants of v-erbB and then chimeras between v-src and v-erbB. As reported previously, the absence of any membrane anchorage eliminated transformation by v-erbB. Anchorage of the cytoplasmic kinase domain of v-erbB to membranes with amino-terminal portions of the v-src protein permitted transformation. The phenotype and spectrum of transformation were those expected for v-erbB rather than for v-src. The transforming chimeras lost their biological activity if the signal for myristylation at the amino terminus of v-src was compromised by mutation. Biochemical fractionations revealed a correlation between transforming activity and the association of chimeric gene products with the membrane fraction of the cell. For reasons not yet apparent, the combined presence of membrane anchorage domains of v-src, and the transmembrane domain of v-erbB in the same chimera typically (but not inevitably) impeded transformation. Our results suggest that the specificity of transformation by v-erbB resides in the selection of substrates by the cytoplasmic domain of the gene product. The protein retains access to those substrates even when anchored to the membrane in the manner of a peripheral rather than a transmembrane protein.

The amino-terminal 14 amino acids of v-src can functionally replace the extracellular and transmembrane domains of v-erbB

The retroviral oncogene v-erbB encodes a truncated form of the receptor for epidermal growth factor, an integral membrane protein-tyrosine kinase. By contrast, the oncogene v-src encodes a protein-tyrosine kinase that is a peripheral membrane protein. The morphologies and spectra of cells transformed by these two oncogenes differ. In an effort to identify the functional determinant(s) of these differences, we constructed and tested first deletion mutants of v-erbB and then chimeras between v-src and v-erbB. As reported previously, the absence of any membrane anchorage eliminated transformation by v-erbB. Anchorage of the cytoplasmic kinase domain of v-erbB to membranes with amino-terminal portions of the v-src protein permitted transformation. The phenotype and spectrum of transformation were those expected for v-erbB rather than for v-src. The transforming chimeras lost their biological activity if the signal for myristylation at the amino terminus of v-src was compromised by mutation. Biochemical fractionations revealed a correlation between transforming activity and the association of chimeric gene products with the membrane fraction of the cell. For reasons not yet apparent, the combined presence of membrane anchorage domains of v-src, and the transmembrane domain of v-erbB in the same chimera typically (but not inevitably) impeded transformation. Our results suggest that the specificity of transformation by v-erbB resides in the selection of substrates by the cytoplasmic domain of the gene product. The protein retains access to those substrates even when anchored to the membrane in the manner of a peripheral rather than a transmembrane protein.