Active Replication Checkpoint Drives Genome Instability in Fission Yeast mcm4 Mutant

Determinants of RPA megafoci localization to the nuclear periphery in response to replication stress

Upon replication stress, ssDNA, coated by the ssDNA-binding protein RPA, accumulates and generates a signal to activate the replication stress response. Severe replication stress induced by the loss of minichromosome maintenance helicase subunit Mcm4 in the temperature-sensitive Schizosaccharomyces pombe degron mutant (mcm4-dg) results in the formation of a large RPA focus that is translocated to the nuclear periphery. We show that resection and repair processes and chromatin remodeler Swr1/Ino80 are involved in the large RPA foci formation and its relocalization to nuclear periphery. This concentrated accumulation of RPA increases the recruitment of Cds1 to chromatin and results in an aberrant cell cycle that lacks MBF-mediated G1/S accumulation of Tos4. These findings reveal a distinct replication stress response mediated by localized accumulation of RPA that allows the evasion of cell cycle arrest.

Comprehensive Analysis of the Expression and Prognosis for MCM4 in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma

Background: Mini chromosome maintenance protein 4 (MCM4) belongs to the family of mini chromosome maintenance proteins (MCMs) that plays a crucial role in DNA replication and cell cycle regulation. Given that MCM4 has been reported to be aberrantly expressed in a variety of tumor tissues, and is strongly associated with poor patient prognosis, it has rarely been reported in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC).

Methods: We explored the role of MCM4 in UCEC through multi-omics analysis, including gene expression levels, survival prognosis, the biological function of interacting proteins, immune infiltration, and diagnostic value. Finally, these results were confirmed by biological experiments.

Results: MCM4 was highly expressed in various malignancies including UCEC compared to normal samples and was associated with poor prognosis in patients with UCEC [including OS (HR = 1.74, p = 0.009), PFI (HR = 1.73, p = 0.002), PFI (HR = 2.23, p = 0.003)]. In the Cox regression analysis, MCM4 was an independent prognostic biomarker. Further studies showed those interacting proteins of MCM4 were enriched in DNA repair and cell cycle. Moreover, high expression of MCM4 was accompanied by lower infiltration of immune cells such as Treg cells and B cells. The distribution of MCM4 expression in molecular and immune subtypes was significantly different (p < 0.05), with high expression in the copynumber high (CN_HIGH) molecular subtype and the IFN-gamma dominant (C2) immune subtype. RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry results also showed that MCM4 expression was significantly upregulated in endometrial cancer tissues and negatively correlated with patient prognosis (p < 0.05). Subsequent biological experiments confirmed that MCM4 promoted cell growth and invasion and inhibited apoptosis in vitro.

Conclusion: Therefore, MCM4 could be a new potential biomarker for UCEC.

Monitoring Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome stress by visualizing end-binding protein Ku

Studies of genome stability have exploited visualization of fluorescently tagged proteins in live cells to characterize DNA damage, checkpoint, and repair responses. In this report, we describe a new tool for fission yeast, a tagged version of the end-binding protein Pku70 which is part of the KU protein complex. We compare Pku70 localization to other markers upon treatment to various genotoxins, and identify a unique pattern of distribution. Pku70 provides a new tool to define and characterize DNA lesions and the repair response.

Summary: The authors describe a fluorescently tagged Ku70 protein to monitor replication stress in live S. pombe cells.

Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms

DNA replication is laden with obstacles that slow, stall, collapse, and break DNA replication forks. At each obstacle, there is a decision to be made whether to bypass the lesion, repair or restart the damaged fork, or to protect stalled forks from further demise. Each "decision" draws upon multitude of proteins participating in various mechanisms that allow repair and restart of replication forks. Specific functions for many of these proteins have been described and an understanding of how they come together in supporting replication forks is starting to emerge. Many questions, however, remain regarding selection of the mechanisms that enable faithful genome duplication and how "normal" intermediates in these mechanisms are sometimes funneled into "rogue" processes that destabilize the genome and lead to cancer, cell death, and emergence of chemotherapeutic resistance. In this review we will discuss molecular mechanisms of DNA damage bypass and replication fork protection and repair. We will specifically focus on the key players that define which mechanism is employed including: PCNA and its control by posttranslational modifications, translesion synthesis DNA polymerases, molecular motors that catalyze reversal of stalled replication forks, proteins that antagonize fork reversal and protect reversed forks from nucleolytic degradation, and the machinery of homologous recombination that helps to reestablish broken forks. We will also discuss risks to genome integrity inherent in each of these mechanisms.