Descending octopaminergic neurons modulate sensory-evoked activity of thoracic motor neurons in stick insects

Descending networks transform command signals into population motor control

To convert intentions into actions, movement instructions must pass from the brain to downstream motor circuits through descending neurons (DNs). These include small sets of command-like neurons that are sufficient to drive behaviours1-the circuit mechanisms for which remain unclear. Here we show that command-like DNs in Drosophila directly recruit networks of additional DNs to orchestrate behaviours that require the active control of numerous body parts. Specifically, we found that command-like DNs previously thought to drive behaviours alone2-4 in fact co-activate larger populations of DNs. Connectome analyses and experimental manipulations revealed that this functional recruitment can be explained by direct excitatory connections between command-like DNs and networks of interconnected DNs in the brain. Descending population recruitment is necessary for behavioural control: DNs with many downstream descending partners require network co-activation to drive complete behaviours and drive only simple stereotyped movements in their absence. These DN networks reside within behaviour-specific clusters that inhibit one another. These results support a mechanism for command-like descending control in which behaviours are generated through the recruitment of increasingly large DN networks that compose behaviours by combining multiple motor subroutines.

Octopaminergic descending neurons in Drosophila: Connectivity, tonic activity and relation to locomotion

Projection neurons that communicate between different brain regions and local neurons that shape computation within a brain region form the majority of all neurons in the brain. Another important class of neurons is neuromodulatory neurons; these neurons are in much smaller numbers than projection/local neurons but have a large influence on computations in the brain. Neuromodulatory neurons are classified by the neurotransmitters they carry, such as dopamine and serotonin. Much of our knowledge of the effect of neuromodulators comes from experiments in which either a large population of neuromodulatory neurons or the entire population is perturbed. Alternatively, a given neuromodulator is exogenously applied. While these experiments are informative of the general role of the neurotransmitter, one limitation of these experiments is that the role of individual neuromodulatory neurons remains unknown. In this study, we investigate the role of a class of octopaminergic (octopamine is the invertebrate equivalent of norepinephrine) neurons in Drosophila or fruit fly. Neuromodulation in Drosophila work along similar principles as humans; and the smaller number of neuromodulatory neurons allow us to assess the role of individual neurons. This study focuses on a subpopulation of octopaminergic descending neurons (OA-DNs) whose cell bodies are in the brain and project to the thoracic ganglia. Using in-vivo whole-cell patch-clamp recordings and anatomical analyses that allow us to compare light microscopy data to the electron microscopic volumes available in the fly, we find that neurons within each cluster have similar physiological properties, including their relation to locomotion. However, neurons in the same cluster with similar anatomy have very different connectivity. Our data is consistent with the hypothesis that each OA-DN is recruited individually and has a unique function within the fly's brain.

Descending interneurons of the stick insect connecting brain neuropiles with the prothoracic ganglion

Stick insects respond to visual or tactile stimuli with whole-body turning or directed reach-to-grasp movements. Such sensory-induced turning and reaching behaviour requires interneurons to convey information from sensory neuropils of the head ganglia to motor neuropils of the thoracic ganglia. To date, descending interneurons are largely unknown in stick insects. In particular, it is unclear whether the special role of the front legs in sensory-induced turning and reaching has a neuroanatomical correlate in terms of descending interneuron numbers. Here, we describe the population of descending interneurons with somata in the brain or gnathal ganglion in the stick insect Carausius morosus, providing a first map of soma cluster counts and locations. By comparison of interneuron populations with projections to the pro- and mesothoracic ganglia, we then estimate the fraction of descending interneurons that terminate in the prothoracic ganglion. With regard to short-latency, touch-mediated reach-to-grasp movements, we also locate likely sites of synaptic interactions between antennal proprioceptive afferents to the deutocerebrum and gnathal ganglion with descending or ascending interneuron fibres. To this end, we combine fluorescent dye stainings of thoracic connectives with stainings of antennal hair field sensilla. Backfills of neck connectives revealed up to 410 descending interneuron somata (brain: 205 in 19 clusters; gnathal ganglion: 205). In comparison, backfills of the prothorax-mesothorax connectives stained only up to 173 somata (brain: 83 in 16 clusters; gnathal ganglion: 90), suggesting that up to 60% of all descending interneurons may terminate in the prothoracic ganglion (estimated upper bound). Double stainings of connectives and antennal hair field sensilla revealed that ascending or descending fibres arborise in close proximity of afferent terminals in the deutocerebrum and in the middle part of the gnathal ganglia. We conclude that two cephalothoracic pathways may convey cues about antennal movement and pointing direction to thoracic motor centres via two synapses only.

Neural circuit regulation by identified modulatory projection neurons

Rhythmic behaviors (e.g., walking, breathing, and chewing) are produced by central pattern generator (CPG) circuits. These circuits are highly dynamic due to a multitude of input they receive from hormones, sensory neurons, and modulatory projection neurons. Such inputs not only turn CPG circuits on and off, but they adjust their synaptic and cellular properties to select behaviorally relevant outputs that last from seconds to hours. Similar to the contributions of fully identified connectomes to establishing general principles of circuit function and flexibility, identified modulatory neurons have enabled key insights into neural circuit modulation. For instance, while bath-applying neuromodulators continues to be an important approach to studying neural circuit modulation, this approach does not always mimic the neural circuit response to neuronal release of the same modulator. There is additional complexity in the actions of neuronally-released modulators due to: (1) the prevalence of co-transmitters, (2) local- and long-distance feedback regulating the timing of (co-)release, and (3) differential regulation of co-transmitter release. Identifying the physiological stimuli (e.g., identified sensory neurons) that activate modulatory projection neurons has demonstrated multiple “modulatory codes” for selecting particular circuit outputs. In some cases, population coding occurs, and in others circuit output is determined by the firing pattern and rate of the modulatory projection neurons. The ability to perform electrophysiological recordings and manipulations of small populations of identified neurons at multiple levels of rhythmic motor systems remains an important approach for determining the cellular and synaptic mechanisms underlying the rapid adaptability of rhythmic neural circuits.

neuroWalknet, a controller for hexapod walking allowing for context dependent behavior

Decentralized control has been established as a key control principle in insect walking and has been successfully leveraged to account for a wide range of walking behaviors in the proposed neuroWalknet architecture. This controller allows for walking patterns at different velocities in both, forward and backward direction-quite similar to the behavior shown in stick insects-, for negotiation of curves, and for robustly dealing with various disturbances. While these simulations focus on the cooperation of different, decentrally controlled legs, here we consider a set of biological experiments not yet been tested by neuroWalknet, that focus on the function of the individual leg and are context dependent. These intraleg studies deal with four groups of interjoint reflexes. The reflexes are elicited by stimulation of the femoral chordotonal organ (fCO) or groups of campaniform sensilla (CS). Motor output signals are recorded from the alpha-joint, the beta-joint or the gamma-joint of the leg. Furthermore, the influence of these sensory inputs to artificially induced oscillations by application of pilocarpine has been studied. Although these biological data represent results obtained from different local reflexes in different contexts, they fit with and are embedded into the behavior shown by the global structure of neuroWalknet. In particular, a specific and intensively studied behavior, active reaction, has since long been assumed to represent a separate behavioral element, from which it is not clear why it occurs in some situations, but not in others. This question could now be explained as an emergent property of the holistic structure of neuroWalknet which has shown to be able to produce artificially elicited pilocarpine-driven oscillation that can be controlled by sensory input without the need of explicit innate CPG structures. As the simulation data result from a holistic system, further results were obtained that could be used as predictions to be tested in further biological experiments.

Descending control of nociception in insects?

Modulation of nociception allows animals to optimize chances of survival by adapting their behaviour in different contexts. In mammals, this is executed by neurons from the brain and is referred to as the descending control of nociception. Whether insects have such control, or the neural circuits allowing it, has rarely been explored. Based on behavioural, neuroscientific and molecular evidence, we argue that insects probably have descending controls for nociception. Behavioural work shows that insects can modulate nocifensive behaviour. Such modulation is at least in part controlled by the central nervous system since the information mediating such prioritization is processed by the brain. Central nervous system control of nociception is further supported by neuroanatomical and neurobiological evidence showing that the insect brain can facilitate or suppress nocifensive behaviour, and by molecular studies revealing pathways involved in the inhibition of nocifensive behaviour both peripherally and centrally. Insects lack the endogenous opioid peptides and their receptors that contribute to mammalian descending nociception controls, so we discuss likely alternative molecular mechanisms for the insect descending nociception controls. We discuss what the existence of descending control of nociception in insects may reveal about pain perception in insects and finally consider the ethical implications of these novel findings.

Investigating the role of low level reinforcement reflex loops in insect locomotion

Insects are highly capable walkers, but many questions remain regarding how the insect nervous system controls locomotion. One particular question is how information is communicated between the 'lower level' ventral nerve cord (VNC) and the 'higher level' head ganglia to facilitate control. In this work, we seek to explore this question by investigating how systems traditionally described as 'positive feedback' may initiate and maintain stepping in the VNC with limited information exchanged between lower and higher level centers. We focus on the 'reflex reversal' of the stick insect femur-tibia joint between a resistance reflex (RR) and an active reaction in response to joint flexion, as well as the activation of populations of descending dorsal median unpaired (desDUM) neurons from limb strain as our primary reflex loops. We present the development of a neuromechanical model of the stick insect (Carausius morosus) femur-tibia (FTi) and coxa-trochanter joint control networks 'in-the-loop' with a physical robotic limb. The control network generates motor commands for the robotic limb, whose motion and forces generate sensory feedback for the network. We based our network architecture on the anatomy of the non-spiking interneuron joint control network that controls the FTi joint, extrapolated network connectivity based on known muscle responses, and previously developed mechanisms to produce 'sideways stepping'. Previous studies hypothesized that RR is enacted by selective inhibition of sensory afferents from the femoral chordotonal organ, but no study has tested this hypothesis with a model of an intact limb. We found that inhibiting the network's flexion position and velocity afferents generated a reflex reversal in the robot limb's FTi joint. We also explored the intact network's ability to sustain steady locomotion on our test limb. Our results suggested that the reflex reversal and limb strain reinforcement mechanisms are both necessary but individually insufficient to produce and maintain rhythmic stepping in the limb, which can be initiated or halted by brief, transient descending signals. Removing portions of this feedback loop or creating a large enough disruption can halt stepping independent of the higher-level centers. We conclude by discussing why the nervous system might control motor output in this manner, as well as how to apply these findings to generalized nervous system understanding and improved robotic control.

Neuromodulation Can Be Simple: Myoinhibitory Peptide, Contained in Dedicated Regulatory Pathways, Is the Only Neurally-Mediated Peptide Modulator of Stick Insect Leg Muscle

In the best studied cases (Aplysia feeding, crustacean stomatogastric system), peptidergic modulation is mediated by large numbers of peptides. Furthermore, in Aplysia, excitatory motor neurons release the peptides, obligatorily coupling target activation and modulator release. Vertebrate nervous systems typically contain about a hundred peptide modulators. These data have created a belief that modulation is, in general, complex. The stick insect leg is a well-studied locomotory model system, and the complete stick insect neuropeptide inventory was recently described. We used multiple techniques to comprehensively examine stick insect leg peptidergic modulation. Single-cell mass spectrometry (MS) and immunohistochemistry showed that myoinhibitory peptide (MIP) is the only neuronal (as opposed to hemolymph-borne) peptide modulator of all leg muscles. Leg muscle excitatory motor neurons contained no neuropeptides. Only the common inhibitor (CI) and dorsal unpaired median (DUM) neuron groups, each neuron of which innervates a group of functionally-related leg muscles, contained MIP. We described MIP transport to, and receptor presence in, one leg muscle, the extensor tibiae (ExtTi). MIP application reduced ExtTi slow fiber force and shortening by about half, increasing the muscle's ability to contract and relax rapidly. These data show neuromodulation does not need to be complex. Excitation and modulation do not need to be obligatorily coupled (Aplysia feeding). Modulation does not need to involve large numbers of peptides, with the attendant possibility of combinatorial explosion (stomatogastric system). Modulation can be simple, mediated by dedicated regulatory neurons, each innervating a single group of functionally-related targets, and all using the same neuropeptide.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Vertebrate and invertebrate nervous systems contain large numbers (around a hundred in human brain) of peptide neurotransmitters. In prior work, neuropeptide modulation has been complex, either obligatorily coupling postsynaptic excitation and modulation, or large numbers of peptides modulating individual neural networks. The complete stick insect neuropeptide inventory was recently described. We comprehensively describe here peptidergic modulation in the stick insect leg. Surprisingly, out of the large number of potential peptide transmitters, only myoinhibitory peptide (MIP) was present in neurons innervating leg muscles. Furthermore, the peptide was present only in dedicated regulatory neurons, not in leg excitatory motor neurons. Peptidergic modulation can thus be simple, neither obligatorily coupling target activation and modulation nor involving so many peptides that combinatorial explosion can occur.

Distributed processing of load and movement feedback in the premotor network controlling an insect leg joint

In legged animals, integration of information from various proprioceptors in and on the appendages by local premotor networks in the central nervous system is crucial for controlling motor output. To ensure posture maintenance and precise active movements, information about limb loading and movement is required. In insects, various groups of campaniform sensilla (CS) measure forces and loads acting in different directions on the leg, and the femoral chordotonal organ (fCO) provides information about movement of the femur-tibia (FTi) joint. In this study, we used extra- and intracellular recordings of extensor tibiae (ExtTi) and retractor coxae (RetCx) motor neurons (MNs) and identified local premotor nonspiking interneurons (NSIs) and mechanical stimulation of the fCO and tibial or trochanterofemoral CS (tiCS, tr/fCS), to investigate the premotor network architecture underlying multimodal proprioceptive integration. We found that load feedback from tiCS altered the strength of movement-elicited resistance reflexes and determined the specificity of ExtTi and RetCx MN responses to various load and movement stimuli. These responses were mediated by a common population of identified NSIs into which synaptic inputs from the fCO, tiCS, and tr/fCS are distributed, and whose effects onto ExtTi MNs can be antagonistic for both stimulus modalities. Multimodal sensory signal interaction was found at the level of single NSIs and MNs. The results provide evidence that load and movement feedback are integrated in a multimodal, distributed local premotor network consisting of antagonistic elements controlling movements of the FTi joint, thus substantially extending current knowledge on how legged motor systems achieve fine-tuned motor control.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Proprioception is crucial for motor control in legged animals. We show the extent to which processing of movement (fCO) and load (CS) signals overlaps in the local premotor network of an insect leg. Multimodal signals converge onto the same set of interneurons, and our knowledge about distributed, antagonistic processing is extended to incorporate multiple modalities within one perceptual neuronal framework.

The roles of ascending sensory signals and top-down central control in the entrainment of a locomotor CPG

Previous authors have proposed two basic hypotheses about the factors that form the basis of locomotor rhythms in walking insects: sensory feedback only or sensory feedback together with rhythmic activity of small neural circuits called central pattern generators (CPGs). Here we focus on the latter. Following this concept, to generate functional outputs, locomotor control must feature both rhythm generation by CPGs at the level of individual joints and coordination of their rhythmic activities, so that all muscles are activated in an appropriate pattern. This work provides an in-depth analysis of an aspect of this coordination process based on an existing network model of stick insect locomotion. Specifically, we consider how the control system for a single joint in the stick insect leg may produce rhythmic output when subjected to ascending sensory signals from other joints in the leg. In this work, the core rhythm generating CPG component of the joint under study is represented by a classical half-center oscillator constrained by a basic set of experimental observations. While the dynamical features of this CPG, including phase transitions by escape and release, are well understood, we provide novel insights about how these transition mechanisms yield entrainment to the incoming sensory signal, how entrainment can be lost under variation of signal strength and period or other perturbations, how entrainment can be restored by modulation of tonic top-down drive levels, and how these factors impact the duty cycle of the motor output.

Gradients in mechanotransduction of force and body weight in insects

Posture and walking require support of the body weight, which is thought to be detected by sensory receptors in the legs. Specificity in sensory encoding occurs through the numerical distribution, size and response range of sense organs. We have studied campaniform sensilla, receptors that detect forces as strains in the insect exoskeleton. The sites of mechanotransduction (cuticular caps) were imaged by light and confocal microscopy in four species (stick insects, cockroaches, blow flies and Drosophila). The numbers of receptors and cap diameters were determined in projection images. Similar groups of receptors are present in the legs of each species (flies lack Group 2 on the anterior trochanter). The number of receptors is generally related to the body weight but similar numbers are found in blow flies and Drosophila, despite a 30 fold difference in their weight. Imaging data indicate that the gradient (range) of cap sizes may more closely correlate with the body weight: the range of cap sizes is larger in blow flies than in Drosophila but similar to that found in juvenile cockroaches. These studies support the idea that morphological properties of force-detecting sensory receptors in the legs may be tuned to reflect the body weight.