Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature

The evolution and key components of oncoanaesthesia: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Oncoanaesthesia is a specialised branch of anaesthesia dedicated to enhancing outcomes, prioritising patient safety and improving the overall care of patients with cancer during surgery. We outline the global epidemiology of cancer, emphasising the necessity for this subspecialty, and discuss the criteria supporting its establishment.

METHODS

We performed searches of electronic databases to identify relevant peer-reviewed publications. The search was designed to capture a wide range of study types, including randomised controlled trials; retrospective studies; meta-analyses; and systematic reviews. The titles and abstracts were screened to identify publications relevant to oncoanaesthesia, cancer recurrence and return to intended therapy. The reference lists were manually reviewed to identify relevant papers for consideration.

RESULTS

This review highlights the growth of oncoanaesthesia over the past decade. Research opportunities abound in areas such as: the impact of anaesthesia on cancer recurrence; the use of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes; patient blood management; peri-operative nutrition; techniques for modulating peri-operative inflammatory responses; and strategies to reduce the time to return to intended oncological treatment.

DISCUSSION

By integrating various subspecialties within oncology centres, oncoanaesthesia ensures a thorough and holistic approach to both curative and palliative cancer care, ultimately improving patient outcomes and providing better support for families and caregivers throughout the peri-operative period.

Systemic anti-cancer therapy and anaesthesia: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Cancer research has revolutionised the treatment, quality of life and life expectancy of people living with cancer. Systemic anti-cancer treatments have expanded to involve not only cytotoxic drugs, but targeted drugs and immunotherapy. Although highly effective in many patients, these drugs can cause serious and sometimes life-threatening adverse reactions. As part of their treatment, many patients living with cancer will be offered both systemic anti-cancer therapy and surgery, and many patients will undergo recurrent episodes of both with the aims of cure, palliation or prolongation of life expectancy. It is important for anaesthetists to understand the effects of systemic anti-cancer therapy on their patients.

METHODS

An electronic literature search using was conducted in May 2024 for peer-reviewed articles in English. An initial search of the terms 'anaesthesia' and 'chemotherapy' revealed that existing review literature was tailored towards the neoadjuvant setting and prompted this review to include the complications of targeted therapies, emergency care and intra-operative administration of systemic anti-cancer therapy to reflect this evolving field. A narrative approach was taken to discuss common regimens and their complications.

RESULTS

The review encompasses a wide range of sub-topics including pharmacology; physiology; peri-operative medicine; specialist surgery; adverse events; and safety. Data from multicentre trials that form the basis of current treatment regimens and practice were prioritised during the selection process. Smaller studies, case series and case reports were included to illustrate the rarer but clinically significant adverse effects of specific therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important for anaesthetists to have a comprehensive understanding of the effects of systemic anti-cancer therapies, including cytotoxic and immunotherapies. There are many potential toxicities and complications associated with these treatments, particularly in the context of emergency surgery and the administration of cytotoxic drugs within the operating theatre environment.

Reduction of red blood cell transfusion with a patient blood management protocol in urological and visceral surgery: a before-after study

BACKGROUND

Although Patient Blood Management (PBM) is recommended by international guidelines, little evidence of its effectiveness exists in abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of the implementation of a PBM protocol on transfusion incidence and anaemia-related outcomes in major urological and visceral surgery.

METHODS

In this before-after study, a three-pillar PBM protocol was implemented in 2020-2021 in a tertiary care centre, including preoperative correction of iron-deficiency anaemia, intraoperative tranexamic acid administration, and postoperative restrictive transfusion. A historical cohort (2019) was compared to a prospective cohort (2022) after the implementation of the PBM protocol. The primary outcome was the incidence of red blood cell transfusion intraoperatively or within 7 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Data from 488 patients in the historical cohort were compared to 499 patients in the prospective cohort. Between 2019 and 2022, screening for iron deficiency increased from 13.9% to 69.8% (p < 0.01), tranexamic acid administration increased from 9.5% to 84.6% (p < 0.01), and median haemoglobin concentration before transfusion decreased from 77 g.L-1 to 71 g.L-1 (p = 0.02). The incidence of red blood cell transfusion decreased from 11.5% in 2019 to 6.6% in 2022 (relative risk 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87, p = 0.01). The incidence of haemoglobin concentration lower than 100 g.L-1 at discharge was 24.2% in 2019 and 21.8% in 2022 (p =  0.41). The incidence of medical complications was comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a PBM protocol over a two-year period was associated with a reduction of transfusion in major urological and visceral surgery.

Perioperative Blood Transfusions and Cancer Progression: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the most recent evidence about known controversies on the effect of perioperative transfusion on cancer progression.

RECENT FINDINGS

Laboratory evidence suggests that transfusion-related immunomodulation can be modified by blood management and storage practices, but it is likely of less intensity than the effect of the surgical stress response. Clinical evidence has questioned the independent effect of blood transfusion on cancer progression for some cancers but supported it for others. Despite major changes in surgery and anesthesia, cancer surgery remains a major player in perioperative blood product utilization. Prospective data is still required to strengthen or refute existing associations. Transfusion-related immunomodulation in cancer surgery is well-documented, but the extent to which it affects cancer progression is unclear. Associations between transfusion and cancer progression are disease-specific. Increasing evidence shows autologous blood transfusion may be safe in cancer surgery.

Massive transfusion in trauma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of currently recommended treatment approaches for traumatic hemorrhage shock, with a special focus on massive transfusion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Severe trauma patients require massive transfusion, but consensual international definitions for traumatic hemorrhage shock and massive transfusion are missing. Current literature defines a massive transfusion as transfusion of a minimum of 3-4 packed red blood cells within 1 h. Using standard laboratory and/or viscoelastic tests, earliest diagnosis and treatment should focus on trauma-induced coagulopathy and substitution of substantiated deficiencies.

SUMMARY

To initiate therapy immediately massive transfusion protocols are helpful focusing on early hemorrhage control using hemostatic dressing and tourniquets, correction of metabolic derangements to decrease coagulopathy and substitution according to viscoelastic assays and blood gases analysis with tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate, red blood cells, plasma and platelets are recommended. Alternatively, the use of whole blood is possible. If needed, further support using prothrombin complex, factor XIII or desmopressin is suggested.

Case report: Anesthetic management for removal of tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava and pulmonary artery in renal cell carcinoma

Anesthetic management of patients with renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava (IVC) is challenging. This paper reports the experience of anesthesia management in a patient with advanced renal cell carcinoma with thrombus accumulation in the IVC, right atrium, and pulmonary artery who underwent radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombus removal assisted by cardiopulmonary bypass. The emboli, measuring approximately 3 × 6 cm in the left inferior pulmonary artery and 4 × 13 cm in the right main pulmonary artery, were removed completely. During incision of the IVC under systemic heparinization, significant blood loss occurred in the surgical field. The surgery took 724 min, and cardiopulmonary bypass took 396 min. Intraoperative blood loss was 22,000 ml. The patient was extubated 39 hours after surgery and stayed in intensive care unit for 3 days. At 1 year follow-up, the patient was in good health and leading a normal life.

Current role of intraoperative cell salvage techniques in the management of renal tumors with level III and IV inferior vena cava thrombus extension

Background

En bloc removal of the kidney with tumor thrombus excision in a multidisciplinary team remains the standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus extension. In order to minimize the hemodynamic impact of the surgical blood loss, intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) techniques can decrease the need for allogeneic blood and prevent blood transfusion related complications.

Objective

In this article, we evaluated the safety of IOCS during radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy under cardiopulmonary bypass with or without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Design and method

In this retrospective comparative multicenter analysis, clinical characteristics of 27 consecutive patients who underwent surgery with or without IOCS between 2012 and 2022 in three referral care units were collected into a database. The need for an allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) was also recorded, defined as any transfusion that occurred either intraoperatively or during the hospital stay.

Results

The need for ABT in the cell saver arm was significantly smaller due to the reinfusion of rescued blood (p < 0.015). In multivariate analysis, no cell saver usage was an independent predictor for complications ⩾3 Clavien 3a [odds ratio (OR) 18.71, 95% CI 1.056-331.703, p = 0.046]. No usage of IOCS was an independent predictor for a lower risk of death (OR 0.277, 95% CI 0.062-0.825, p = 0.024). During follow-up, patients who received salvaged blood did not experience an increased risk for developing local recurrence or distant metastases.

Conclusion

Transfusion of autologous blood is safe and can be using during nephrectomy and thrombectomy for advanced RCC.

Anesthetic management of a huge retroperitoneal leiomyoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal leiomyomas are rare, with just over 100 cases reported in the literature. Perioperative management of retroperitoneal leiomyomas can be challenging due to the large tumor size and the risk of hemorrhage.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 40-year-old Han woman with a 40-cm retroperitoneal leiomyoma. General anesthesia was performed for the surgical resection. Key flow parameters like cardiac output and stroke volume variation, as shown by the Vigileo™-FloTrac™ system, enabled the anesthesiologist to implement goal-directed fluid optimization. Acute normovolemic hemodilution and cell salvage technique were used resulting in a successful en bloc tumor resection with a 6000-mL estimated blood loss. Although the patient experienced postoperative bowel obstruction, no other significant complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Advanced hemodynamic monitoring and modern patient blood management strategies are particularly helpful for anesthetic management of huge retroperitoneal leiomyomas.

Is Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction Feasible in Jehovah's Witness Patients?

BACKGROUND

Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) population are members of a religious group that refuses blood transfusion. This presents a dilemma for surgical teams when performing major surgical procedures on these patients.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of undergoing microvascular free flaps for maxillofacial reconstruction in JW patients and whether the type of underlying pathology impacts outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE

This was a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. The sample consisted of all JW patients who have undergone microvascular free tissue transfer for maxillofacial pathology between January 2016 and January 2021.

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The primary predictor variable was the underlying pathology for which patients underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction; this was benign versus malignant disease.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome variables were safety, defined as discharge from the hospital with no mortality, and feasibility defined as successful free flap reconstruction.

COVARIATES

Other variables included age, race, sex, length of surgery, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative use of vasopressors.

ANALYSIS

Data analysis was performed utilizing t-tests for means and χ2 for proportions. Alpha was set at < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 12 participants from 7 participating sites met the inclusion criteria. There were 9 males and 3 females with a mean age of 58.3 ± 8.3 years. There were no deaths in this cohort and all patients were discharged from the hospital. All 12 free flap reconstructions were successful with no incidents of free flap loss; none of the patients received any blood transfusions or any other blood products. Subgroup analysis showed that patients treated for malignant disease versus benign disease had longer operations (11.2 ± 2.9 vs 6.3 ± 0.2 hours, P < .01) and a longer hospital length of stay (11.8 ± 4.9 vs 5.3 ± 0.5 days, P = .04).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Our series supports the safety and feasibility of maxillofacial free flap reconstruction in this challenging subset of patients. Microvascular reconstructive surgeries for malignant diseases often result in longer operative times and hospital stays.

Principles of minimize bleeding and the transfusion of blood and its components in operated patients - surgical aspects

One of the target of perioperative tratment in surgery is decreasing intraoperative bleeding, which increases the number of perioperative procedures, mortality and treatment costs, and also causes the risk of transfusion of blood and its components. Trying to minimize the blood loss(mainly during the operation) as well as the need to transfuse blood and its components (broadly understood perioperative period) should be standard treatment for a patient undergoing a procedure. In the case of this method, the following steps should be taken: 1) in the preoperative period: identyfication of risk groups as quickly as possible, detecting and treating anemia, applying prehabilitation, modyfying anticoagulant treatment, considering donating one's own blood in some patients and in selected cases erythropoietin preparations; 2) in the perioperative period: aim for normothermia, normovolemia and normoglycemia, use of surgical methods that reduce bleeding, such as minimally invasive surgery, high-energy coagulation, local hemostatics, prevention of surgical site infection, proper transfusion of blood and its components if it occurs; 3) in the postoperative period: monitor the condition of patients, primarily for the detection of bleeding, rapid reoperation if required, suplementation (oral administration preferred) nutrition with microelements (iron) and vitamins, updating its general condition. All these activities, comprehensively and in surgical cooperation with the anesthesiologist, should reduce the blood loss and transfusion of blood and its components.

The science…or not behind deferrals of blood donors with a history of cancer

BACKGROUND

In the United States (US), each blood center's medical director sets policy for donors with a cancer history.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A subgroup of America's Blood Centers' (ABC) Scientific, Medical, and Technical Committee developed a survey to measure the determination of eligibility, policies for deferral and/or lookback when a donor reports a current diagnosis or history of cancer. A 31-question survey was sent to 47 ABC blood centers in North America via email. Survey results were compiled and literature evaluating the risk of cancer transmission by transfusion was reviewed.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 37 centers (79%). Donors with a history of carcinoma or sarcoma who had completed treatment were accepted at 73% of centers with no further deferral. Donors with a history of leukemia or lymphoma were permanently deferred at 76% of centers. Donors with a myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative syndrome were deferred permanently at 86% of centers. Handling of donors with high white cell counts varied. Donors with cancer not in active treatment (i.e., prostate cancer) were subject to various deferrals. Center response to post-donation reports of cancer vary widely. Literature review yielded no evidence of transfusion-transmitted cancer.

CONCLUSION

Cancer deferral policies vary widely among blood centers, and are not generally based on evidence, but on some aspect of the precautionary principle. As the donor population ages and so becomes more at risk of cancer, this approach may further reduce the available donor pool.

Reduction of EpCAM-Positive Cells from a Cell Salvage Product Is Achieved by Leucocyte Depletion Filters Alone

Intraoperative cell salvage reduces the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in complex cancer surgery, but concerns about the possibility of it re-infusing cancer cells have hindered its application in oncology. We monitored the presence of cancer cells on patient-salvaged blood by means of flow cytometry; next, we simulated cell salvage, followed by leucodepletion and irradiation on blood contaminated with a known amount of EpCAM-expressing cancer cells, assessing also residual cancer cell proliferation as well as the quality of salvaged red blood cell concentrates (RBCs). We observed a significant reduction of EpCAM-positive cells in both cancer patients and contaminated blood, which was comparable to the negative control after leucodepletion. The washing, leucodepletion and leucodepletion plus irradiation steps of cell salvage were shown to preserve the quality of RBCs in terms of haemolysis, membrane integrity and osmotic resistance. Finally, cancer cells isolated from salvaged blood lose their ability to proliferate. Our results confirm that cell salvage does not concentrate proliferating cancer cells, and that leucodepletion allows for the reduction of residual nucleated cells, making irradiation unnecessary. Our study gathers pieces of evidence on the feasibility of this procedure in complex cancer surgery. Nevertheless, it highlights the necessity of finding a definitive consensus through prospective trials.

Preoperative Identification and Management of Anemia in the Colorectal Surgery Patient

Preoperative anemia is a common finding in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, particularly those with cancer. While often multifactorial, iron deficiency anemia remains the most common cause of anemia in this patient population. Although seemingly innocuous, preoperative anemia is associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications and need for allogenic blood transfusions, both of which may worsen cancer-specific survival. Preoperative correction of anemia and iron deficiency is thus necessary to diminish these risks. Current literature supports preoperative screening for anemia and iron deficiency in patients slated to undergo colorectal surgery for malignancy or for benign conditions with associated patient- or procedure-related risk factors. Accepted treatment regimens include iron supplementation-either oral or intravenous-as well as erythropoietin therapy. Autologous blood transfusion should not be utilized as a treatment for preoperative anemia when there is time to implement other corrective strategies. Additional study is still needed to better standardize preoperative screening and optimize treatment regimens.

Management of severe peri-operative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care: Second update 2022

BACKGROUND

Management of peri-operative bleeding is complex and involves multiple assessment tools and strategies to ensure optimal patient care with the goal of reducing morbidity and mortality. These updated guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) aim to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations for healthcare professionals to help ensure improved clinical management.

DESIGN

A systematic literature search from 2015 to 2021 of several electronic databases was performed without language restrictions. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies and to formulate recommendations. A Delphi methodology was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline.

RESULTS

These searches identified 137 999 articles. All articles were assessed, and the existing 2017 guidelines were revised to incorporate new evidence. Sixteen recommendations derived from the systematic literature search, and four clinical guidances retained from previous ESAIC guidelines were formulated. Using the Delphi process on 253 sentences of guidance, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 97% and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 3%.

DISCUSSION

Peri-operative bleeding management encompasses the patient's journey from the pre-operative state through the postoperative period. Along this journey, many features of the patient's pre-operative coagulation status, underlying comorbidities, general health and the procedures that they are undergoing need to be taken into account. Due to the many important aspects in peri-operative nontrauma bleeding management, guidance as to how best approach and treat each individual patient are key. Understanding which therapeutic approaches are most valuable at each timepoint can only enhance patient care, ensuring the best outcomes by reducing blood loss and, therefore, overall morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSION

All healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients at risk for surgical bleeding should be aware of the current therapeutic options and approaches that are available to them. These guidelines aim to provide specific guidance for bleeding management in a variety of clinical situations.

Patient blood management and patient safety

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The particular fields within patient blood management (PBM) and patient safety reviewed here include novel insights into bleeding therapy, autologous cell salvage, and perioperative anemia therapy.

RECENT FINDING

World Health Organization has published that implementation of PBM is important but has not yet been performed in all hospitals. Two antibodies that mimic the function of FVIII, Emicizumab, and Mim8 have been developed. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been investigated further in patients with hip surgery and shows reduction of bleeding. Thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is a particular concern that has been investigated in another trial. The use of autologous cell salvage was updated in form of a review and meta-analysis. And last but not least, intravenous iron in preoperative anemia therapy can reduce the number of transfusions, but especially iron carboxymaltose can cause hypophosphatemia.

SUMMARY

PBM should be further implemented in more hospitals. Emicizumab and Mim8 are indicated in acquired hemophilia or hemophilia A with inhibitors. TXA was confirmed to reduce bleeding. Autologous cell salvage is state of the art to reduce transfusion requirements in major cardiac and noncardiac surgery. Serum phosphate concentrations should be monitored after administration of intravenous iron compounds.