Low-dose CBCT protocols in implant dentistry: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the state-of-the-art evidence for applying low-dose CBCT protocols in 3 stages of implant therapy (planning, insertion, and follow-up examination of peri-implantitis) and assess the overall body of evidence presented in the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

The search was conducted in the MEDLINE/Pubmed and Scopus databases. Studies comparing low-dose CBCT protocols to a relevant reference standard in relation to any stage of implant therapy were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed for all included studies.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included. Low-dose protocols were reported to result from reduction of the exposure parameters of kV, mA, resolution (through increased voxel size), exposure time, and scanning trajectory. The current literature suggests that low-dose CBCT protocols perform similarly in the 3 stages of implant therapy compared to higher resolution protocols regarding objective measurements, with adverse impacts mostly on subjective assessment of image quality. The results also suggest that CBCT-based bone measurements are similar to direct measurements, independent of the imaging protocol. Reduction in all parameters except kV seems feasible as the basis of low-dose CBCT protocols for implant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of low-dose CBCT protocols does not impact objective image quality assessment in any stage of implant therapy. Clinical studies are needed to indicate if the reported results can be extrapolated to improve patient care in relation to the responsible use of ionizing radiation.

Low-dose, standard, and high-resolution cone beam computed tomography for alveolar bone measurements related to implant planning: An ex vivo study in human specimens

AIM

To evaluate the performance of low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocols with regard to linear bone measurements in the posterior mandible for implant planning compared with higher dose protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two edentulous posterior sites in human cadaveric mandibles were imaged in three CBCT scanners using three or four protocols with varying exposure parameters to achieve lower dose. Co-registration was performed to generate sagittal and cross-sectional image sections representative of the implant site. Three observers measured bone height, from the alveolar crest to the mandibular canal, and width, three mm from the top of the alveolar crest. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were assessed for the cases rated as nonmeasurable as well as for completed measurements. The measurements were analyzed using paired t-tests for differences among the CBCT protocols and the frequency distribution of nonmeasurable cases with a Pearson Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Reproducibility for registering nonmeasurable cases varied among observers; however, no consistent significant differences were found in the frequency distribution of these cases among observers, units, and protocols. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were >0.9 for all measurements of bone height and width. Mean differences of <0.5 mm were found regardless of protocol; however, one observer did in some cases produce larger differences.

CONCLUSION

Linear bone measurements did not differ significantly and could be performed with excellent reliability, using low-dose CBCT protocols compared with standard and high-resolution ones. Varying approaches for rating nonmeasurable cases were found, indicating differences in diagnostic strategies related to implant planning among observers.

Accuracy of linear measurements for implant planning based on low-dose cone beam CT protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to verify the accuracy of linear measurements performed on low-dose CBCT protocols for implant planning, in comparison with those performed on standard and high-resolution CBCT protocols.

METHODS

The literature search included four databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus). Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts according to eligibility criteria, extracted the data, and examined the methodological quality. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was used for pooling measurement error data.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 4684 titles. In total, 13 studies were included in the systematic review, representing a total of 81 samples, while 9 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of bias ranged from medium to low. The main results across the studies indicate a strong consistency in linear measurements performed on low-dose images in relation to the reference methods. The overall pooled planning measurement error from low-dose CBCT protocols was -0.24 mm (95% CI, -0.52 to 0.04) with a high level of heterogeneity, showing a tendency for underestimation of real values. Various studies found no significant differences in measurements across different protocols (eg, voxel sizes, mA settings, or dose levels), regions (incisor, premolar, molar) and types (height vs. width). Some studies, however, noted exceptions in measurements performed on the posterior mandible.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose CBCT protocols offer adequate precision and accuracy of linear measurements for implant planning. Nevertheless, diagnostic image quality needs must be taken into consideration when choosing a low-dose CBCT protocol.

Predictability and image quality of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography in computer-guided implantology: An experimental study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the predictability and image quality of low-dose cone-beam computed tomography (LD-CBCT) in computer-guided implantology.

METHODS

Pig cadaver mandibles were imaged using high-definition CBCT (HD-CBCT) and LD-CBCT (HD-CBCT: 85 kV, 6 mA, 14.2 s, 767 frames, 1184 mGycm², voxel size 80 µm, effective dose 231 µSv; LD-CBCT: 85 kV, 10 mA, 2.1 s, 384 frames, 84 mGycm², voxel size 160 µm, effective dose 16 µSv; Orthophos SL, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). Digital impressions were taken using intraoral scanning (IOS; Omnicam, Dentsply Sirona). Data of CBCT modalities and IOS were aligned. Forty-eight implants were planned virtually (24 implants per modality; Bone Level 4.1 × 10 mm; Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland). Implants were inserted using templates by initial pilot drilling ("partially-guided implantation"). Implant positions were recorded using IOS. Geometric deviations between planned and definitive positions were assessed regarding implant apex, entry-point and angle. CBCT image quality was evaluated by raters twice on a four point scale. The results were exploratively compared (linear models, Mann-Whitney-U tests).

RESULTS

Regarding implant apex, deviations were greater for LD-CBCT (mean 3.0±1.2 mm), as compared to HD-CBCT (mean 2.3±1.1 mm). For entry-point, no distinct difference was detected with a mean deviation of 1.4±0.9 mm in LD-CBCT, and 1.7±0.6 mm in HD-CBCT. Regarding angle, deviations were greater for LD-CBCT (mean 13.2±6.3°), as compared to HD-CBCT (mean 9.2±5.3°). The image quality of HD-CBCT provided to be better (mean 2.7±0.6) than that of LD-CBCT (mean 2.5±0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the partially-guided approach, the results underline the potential of LD-CBCT alternatively to HD-CBCT for computer-guided implantology. Advantages of HD-CBCT need to be balanced against the higher radiation dose.

Cone-beam computed tomography and its applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was first used in dental and maxillofacial radiology (DMFR) at the end of the 1990s. Since then, it has been successfully established as the standard three-dimensional radiographic imaging technique in DMFR, with a wide variety of applications in this field. This manuscript briefly reviews the background information on the technology and summarises available data on effective dose and dose optimisation. In addition, typical clinical applications and indications of the technique in DMFR are presented.

Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities

OBJECTIVES

A narrative review on the potential use of low-dose protocols for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was conducted to identify indications and their relevance for various dental disciplines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Google Scholar was searched using the words "low-dose CBCT". Reviews, consensus papers, clinical studies, and experimental studies were eligible for the initial screening process, but for data extraction only original articles were selected. Similar search procedures were then performed with the additional search words "pedo," "ortho," "endo," "implant," "perio," and "oral surgery." Furthermore, references of included articles were examined to identify further relevant articles.

RESULTS

After screening, 27 publications remained for the data extraction process. Low-dose protocols have been reported for specialties such as pediatric dentistry (evaluating orofacial clefts, periapical lesions, impacted teeth, and autotransplantation), orthodontics (cephalometric analysis and interim assessment of treatment results), endodontics (detecting root fractures, resorptions and periapical bone loss), implant dentistry (planning implant insertion, evaluating peri-implant fenestration and dehiscence), periodontology (assessing periodontal structures), and oral and maxillofacial surgery (assessing mandibular third molars and TMJs). Nevertheless, most of the literature available is related to non-clinical studies. Furthermore, there is a lack of position statements or guidelines from authoritative bodies regarding the use of low-dose protocols in dental medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose protocols for CBCT imaging seem to have potential in various disciplines in dental medicine ranging from pediatric dentistry to oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dose reduction is usually achieved by mAs reduction, use of partial rotations, reduced number of projections, and larger voxel sizes, but seldom by kV reduction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Albeit low-dose protocols have potential to result in a reduction of dose exposure for 3D imaging due to dental indications, there is a need to more clearly specify indications and limitations to avoid indiscriminate use of standard and high-dose CBCT scans in the future on the lines of ALARA/ALADA principles.

Image quality optimization using a narrow vertical detector dental cone-beam CT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the optimized kV setting for a narrow detector cone-beam CT (CBCT) unit.

METHODS:

Clinical (CL) and quantitative (QUANT) evaluations of image quality were performed using an anthropomorphic phantom. Technical (TECH) evaluation was performed with a polymethyl methacrylate phantom. Images were obtained using a PaX-i3D Green CBCT (Vatech, Hwaseong, Korea) device, with a large 21 × 19 and a medium 12 × 9 cm field of view (FOV), and high-dose (HD-ranging from 85 to 110 kV) and low-dose (LD-ranging from 75 to 95 kV) protocols, totaling four groups (21 × 19 cm HD, 21 × 19 cm LD, 12 × 9 cm HD, 12 × 9 cm LD). The radiation dose within each group was fixed by adapting the mA according to a predetermined dose-area product. For CL evaluation, three observers assessed images based on overall quality, sharpness, contrast, artefacts, and noise. For QUANT evaluation, mean gray value shift, % increase of standard deviation (SD), % of beam hardening and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. For TECH evaluation, segmentation accuracy, CNR, metal artefact SD, metal object area, and sharpness were measured. Representative parameters were chosen for CL, QUANT, and TECH evaluations to determine the optimal kV based on biplot graphs. kV values of the same protocol were compared by the bootstrapping approach. The ones that had statistical differences with the best kV were considered as worse quality.

RESULTS:

Overall, kV values within the same group showed similar quality (p > 0.05), except for 110 kV in 21 × 19 cm HD and 85 kV in 12 × 9 cm HD of CL score; also 85, 90 kV in 21 × 19 cm HD and 75, 80 kV in 21 × 19 cm LD of QUANT score which were worse (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

At a constant dose, low and high kV protocols yield acceptable image quality for a narrow-detector CBCT unit.

Effect of Milliamperage Reduction on Pre-surgical Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography by Surgeons of Varying Experience

BACKGROUND

Differences in CBCT units and the lack of standardization result in exposure to radiation doses beyond what is required for diagnostic purposes, especially when planning the surgical placement of dental implants.

AIM

To assess the influence of low- and high-dose milliamperage settings on CBCT images for objective and subjective implant planning among senior specialists (5 years of experience) and juniors (fresh graduates).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two dry skulls (4 hemi-maxillary segments of the maxilla and 4 hemi-maxillary segments of the mandible) were scanned under low (2 mA) and high (6.3 mA) dosage settings using the Carestream CS 9300 machine. Cross-sectional slices of both image qualities were evaluated by the 5 seniors and the 5 juniors for subjective image utility for implant planning and for objective linear bone measurements.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in bone measurements taken on high- or low-dose images by all seniors and by the majority of juniors (p > 0.05). In qualitative image assessments, there was independence between assessment and image quality for almost all observers. For planning posterior mandibular implant placement, increased dosage improved concordance and kappa values between low- and high-dose images for senior observers (from K = 0.287 at low dose to K = 0.718 at high does) but not for juniors (K = 0.661 and K = 0.509 for low and high dose, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Reduction in milliamperage did not affect diagnostic image quality for objective bone measurements and produced sufficient concordance for qualitative assessment. Judicious optimization of milliamperage settings based on individual diagnostic requirements can result in significant dose reduction without compromising diagnostic decision-making.

Impact of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Dose in Pre-Surgical Implant Analysis

Objectives

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) produces vital information required for the accurate and prudent placement of dental implants. Lack of standardization between CBCT machines may result in unsafe patient exposure to harmful radiation; higher doses are not necessarily associated with improved image quality.

Aim

The study aimed to assess the influence of low- and high-dose milliamperage settings on CBCT images for objective and subjective implant planning.

Methods

Two dry skulls (4 hemi-maxillary segments of the maxilla and 4 hemi-maxillary segments of the mandible) were scanned under low (2 mA) and high (6.3 mA) dosage settings using a CBCT (Carestream CS 9300). Cross-sectional slices of both image qualities were evaluated by five expert clinicians, for image quality for implant planning and objective bone measurements.

Results

There were no significant differences in bone measurements taken on high or low dose images (p > 0.05). In qualitative image assessments, assessment and image quality for almost all observers were independent of each other. For planning posterior mandibular implant placement, increased dosage improved concordance and kappa values between low and high dose images.

Conclusion

Reduction in milliamperage did not affect diagnostic image quality for objective bone measurements and produced sufficient intra-rater reliability for qualitative assessment; therefore dose reduction can be achieved without compromising diagnostic decision- making.

Influence of Tube Current Settings on Diagnostic Detection of Root Fractures Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study

INTRODUCTION

This study assessed the influence of tube current settings (milliamperes [mA]) on the diagnostic detection of root fractures (RFs) using cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging.

METHOD

Sixty-eight human anterior and posterior teeth were submitted to root canal preparation, and 34 root canals were filled. The teeth were divided into 2 groups: the control group and the fractured group. RFs were induced using a universal mechanical testing machine; afterward, the teeth were placed in a phantom. Images were acquired using a Scanora 3DX unit (Soredex, Tuusula, Finland) with 5 different mA settings: 4.0, 5.0, 6.3, 8.0, and 10.0. Two examiners (E1 and E2) classified the images according to a 5-point confidence scale. Intra- and interexaminer reproducibility was assessed using the kappa statistic; diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

Intra- and interexaminer reproducibility showed substantial (κE1 = 0.791 and κE2 = 0.695) and moderate (κE1 × E2 = 0.545) agreement, respectively. AUROC was significantly higher (P ≤ .0389) at 8.0 and 10.0 mA and showed no statistical difference between the 2 tube current settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Tube current has a significant influence on the diagnostic detection of RFs in CBCT images. Despite the acceptable diagnosis of RFs using 4.0 and 5.0 mA, those settings had lower discrimination abilities when compared with settings of 8.0 and 10.0 mA.

Precision, reproducibility, and accuracy of bone crest level measurements of CBCT cross sections using different resolutions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the precision, reproducibility, and accuracy of alveolar crest level measurements on CBCT images obtained with different voxel sizes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CBCT exams were made of 12 dried human mandibles with voxel dimensions of 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mm. Bone crest level was measured directly on the mandibles with a digital caliper and on CBCT images. Images were measured twice by two examiners. Intra- and interexaminer precision and reproducibility were assessed using paired and t-tests, respectively. Accuracy was evaluated using t-tests.

RESULTS

Precision and reproducibility of bone crest level tomographic measurements was good for all voxel sizes evaluated. The images with 0.2-mm voxel size showed a decreased number of intraexaminer errors. A high accuracy for measurements of bone crest level was observed for all CBCT definitions, except for the mandibular incisors using the 0.4-mm voxel size.

CONCLUSIONS

Precision and reproducibility of alveolar bone level measurements were good for various voxel sizes. CBCT images demonstrated good accuracy for 0.2-mm and 0.3-mm voxel sizes. The mandibular incisor region needs better resolution than that provided by 0.4-mm voxel size for bone crest level measurements.

Comparison of different methods to assess alveolar cleft defects in cone beam CT images

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of three different methods for assessing the volume of cleft defects in CBCT images. The influence of field of view (FOV) and voxel sizes was also assessed.

METHODS

Using three radio-opaque plastic skulls, unilateral defects were created to mimic alveolar clefts and were filled with wax following the contralateral side contours. They were scanned in a CBCT unit using four different acquisition protocols, varying FOV and voxel sizes. Using three different methods, the defect/wax volume was evaluated on the images by defining: (1) the width, height and facial-palatal length of the defect in maximum intensity projection; (2) the areas of the defect on axial slices; and (3) the threshold and segmentation of the region of interest. The values obtained from each method using different acquisition protocols were compared with the real volume of the wax (gold standard) using ANOVA and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

Methods 2 and 3 did not differ from the gold standard (p > 0.05). Conversely, Method 1 presented statistically significant overestimated values (p < 0.01). No differences were found among the different FOV and voxel sizes (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT volumes proved reliable for the volumetric assessment of alveolar cleft defects, when using Methods 2 and 3 regardless of FOV and voxel sizes. It may be possible to improve surgical planning and outcomes by knowing the exact volume of grafting material needed prior to the surgical intervention.