Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of a new antibody glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (YM337) in healthy subjects

Determination of the starting dose in the first-in-human clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review of papers published between 1990 and 2013

A systematic review was performed to evaluate how the maximum recommended starting dose (MRSD) was determined in first-in-human (FIH) studies with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Factors associated with the choice of each MRSD determination method were also identified. PubMed was searched for FIH studies with mAbs published in English between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2013, and the following information was extracted: MRSD determination method, publication year, therapeutic area, antibody type, safety factor, safety assessment results after the first dose, and number of dose escalation steps. Seventy-nine FIH studies with mAbs were identified, 49 of which clearly reported the MRSD determination method. The no observed adverse effects level (NOAEL)-based approach was the most frequently used method, whereas the model-based approach was the least commonly used method (34.7% vs 16.3%). The minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL)- or minimum effective dose (MED)-based approach was used more frequently in 2011–2013 than in 1990–2007 (31.6% vs 6.3%, P=0.036), reflecting a slow, but steady acceptance of the European Medicines Agency’s guidance on mitigating risks for FIH clinical trials (2007). The median safety factor was much lower for the MABEL- or MED-based approach than for the other MRSD determination methods (10 vs 32.2–53). The number of dose escalation steps was not significantly different among the different MRSD determination methods. The MABEL-based approach appears to be safer and as efficient as the other MRSD determination methods for achieving the objectives of FIH studies with mAbs faster.

Giving monoclonal antibodies to healthy volunteers in phase 1 trials: is it safe?

Many monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have been studied in healthy volunteers in phase 1, but few data have been published on the safety of that practice. We aimed to review the available data, and thereby to estimate the risks of participation in phase 1trials of MAbs. We searched PubMed, the ClinicalTrials.gov database and Google, using the search terms 'monoclonal antibody', 'phase 1' and 'healthy volunteers'. We identified 70 completed trials of MAbs in healthy volunteers, but the published data were too sparse to allow confident assessment of the risks of MAbs in healthy volunteers. Our best estimate of risk of a life-threatening adverse event was between 1: 425 and 1: 1700 volunteer-trials, but all such events occurred in a single trial (of TGN1412). In a phase 1trial of a small molecule, the risk of death or a life-threatening adverse event appears to be 1: 100,000-1,000,000 volunteer-trials, which is similar to the risk of many ordinary daily activities. Most people would consider that level of risk to be 'minimal' or 'negligible' and, therefore, acceptable. On that basis, the safety record of MAbs in healthy volunteers has been ruined by the TGN1412 disaster. However, that experience is unlikely to be repeated, because of improvements in governance and practice of phase 1trials. If the experience of TGN1412 is disregarded, it seems reasonable to continue using healthy volunteers in phase 1trials of MAbs, provided that there are scientific and medical reasons to conclude that the risk is truly minimal.

Can platelet aggregometry be standardized?

Platelet aggregometry is an important technique which is frequently used by hemostaseologists and researchers. Gustav Born introduced the principle more than 40 years ago. Many different ways to perform aggregometry have been published. The results of aggregometry may become more comparable if some rules would be generally accepted. (1) The pre-analytical procedures are probably the most important factors which influence aggregometry results. Besides correct blood sampling important factors are the preparation of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), incubation of the PRP at room temperature and awareness of time-dependent changes of aggregometry results. (2) A major point concerns the agonists. Agonists of different sources have to be compared to verify that they lead to the expected results. Even different salts of ADP lead to different results and different collagen preparations lead to a large variation of aggregation response (3). The frequently used procedure of adjusting the platelet number in the PRP is cumbersome, affects platelet activation and is not necessary. (4) Aggregometers should comply with some simple rules. The changes in optical density should be linearized so that--if this is required--percentages can be given. The recorder speed should be standardized and all recorders should provide 1?cm/min. Calibration of the aggregometer sensitivity should be possible. (5) If aggregometry is used to define the response to antiaggregating agents agreement on the inducer concentrations is essential. If some rules are applied aggregometry is a relatively simple and reliable method, and well suited for clinical studies and for experimental research.

Biological properties of a specific Galpha q/11 inhibitor, YM-254890, on platelet functions and thrombus formation under high-shear stress

1 The effects of YM-254890, a specific Galpha(q/11) inhibitor, on platelet functions, thrombus formation under high-shear rate condition and femoral artery thrombosis in cynomolgus monkeys were investigated. 2 YM-254890 concentration dependently inhibited ADP-induced intracellular Ca(2+) elevation, with an IC(50) value of 0.92+/-0.28 microM. 3 P-selectin expression induced by ADP or thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP) was strongly inhibited by YM-254890, with IC(50) values of 0.51+/-0.02 and 0.16+/-0.08 microM, respectively. 4 YM-254890 had no effect on the binding of fibrinogen to purified GPIIb/IIIa, but strongly inhibited binding to TRAP-stimulated washed platelets. 5 YM-254890 completely inhibited platelet shape change induced by ADP, but not that induced by collagen, TRAP, arachidonic acid, U46619 or A23187. 6 YM-254890 attenuated ADP-, collagen-, TRAP-, arachidonic acid- and U46619-induced platelet aggregation with IC(50) values of <1 microM, whereas it had no effect on phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-, ristocetin-, thapsigargin- or A23187-induced platelet aggregation. 7 High-shear stress-induced platelet aggregation and platelet-rich thrombus formation on a collagen surface under high-shear flow conditions were concentration dependently inhibited by YM-254890. 8 The antithrombotic effect of YM-254890 was evaluated in a model of cyclic flow reductions in the femoral artery of cynomolgus monkeys. The intravenous bolus injection of YM-254890 dose dependently inhibited recurrent thrombosis without affecting systemic blood pressure or prolonging template bleeding time. 9 YM-254890 is a useful tool for investigating Galpha(q/11)-coupled receptor signaling and the physiological roles of Galpha(q/11).

Avoidance of Bleeding During Surgery in Patients Receiving Anticoagulant and/or Antiplatelet Therapy

Perioperative management of chronically anticoagulated patients and/or patients treated with antiplatelet therapy is a complex medical problem. This review considers the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of commonly used antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs with special emphasis on loss of effects after discontinuation and possible counteracting (or antidote) strategies. These drugs are aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), ticlopidine/clopidogrel, abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide, heparin (unfractionated and low-molecular-weight), warfarin and direct thrombin inhibitors. Since the pharmacological mechanisms of some of these drugs are based on irreversible or slowly reversible effects, their pharmacokinetic profiles are not necessarily predictive for their pharmacodynamic profiles. A close and direct relationship between plasma concentrations and effects is seen only for the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors tirofiban and eptifibatide with a fast off-rate for dissociation from the GPIIb/IIIa receptor, and for direct thrombin inhibitors (hirudin and argatroban). For other compounds, drug concentrations in plasma and pharmacodynamic effects are not closely correlated because of, for example, irreversible binding to their target (aspirin, clopidogrel and abciximab), inhibition of the generation of a subset of clotting factors with differing regeneration and degradation rates (coumarins) or sustained binding to the vascular wall (heparins). Surgery in patients on anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy may be categorised as: (i) elective versus urgent; and (ii) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) versus non-CPB. Monotherapy with clopidogrel or aspirin need not be discontinued in elective non-CPB surgery, and temporary discontinuation of warfarin should be accompanied by preoperative intravenous heparin only in selected high-risk patients. Vitamin K as an antidote for warfarin should only be used subcutaneously and solely in urgent/emergency surgery. In elective surgery requiring CPB (coronary artery bypass grafting), it is recommended to discontinue aspirin 7 days preoperatively in patients with a low risk profile. Patients requiring urgent CPB surgery (e.g. after failure of a percutaneous coronary angioplasty with or without coronary stent deployment) are usually pretreated with several antiplatelet agents (e.g. aspirin and clopidogrel, together with a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor) together with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin. With judicious planning, urgent/emergency cardiac surgery can be safely performed on these patients. Delaying surgery (e.g. for 12 hours in patients treated with abciximab) should be considered if possible. Standard heparin doses should be given to achieve optimal anticoagulation for CPB. Prophylactic use of aprotinin (intra- and/or postoperatively), aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid should be considered. Early (in the operating theatre prior to chest closure) and judicious use of replacement blood products (platelets) should be commenced when clinically indicated.

Pharmacodynamic characterization of the interaction between the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor YM337 and unfractionated heparin and aspirin in humans

AIMS

To investigate the pharmacodynamic interaction of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and acetylic salicylic acid (ASA) on YM337, a monoclonal humanized antibody of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor.

METHODS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled study three treatment groups each with six healthy volunteers received the following medication: group 1, ASA (3 days) + UFH + YM337 (placebo); group 2, ASA (placebo) + UFH (placebo) + YM337; group 3, ASA + UFH + YM337. Assessments were made over 24 h and included bleeding time (BT), ADP (20 microm)- and collagen (5 microg ml-1)-induced platelet aggregation and PAC1 and CD62 expression measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

In group 3 BT was prolonged to 35 [median, 16-45 min (1,3 quartile)] after UFH administration, increasing to 45 [median, 42-45 min (1,3 quartile)] after YM infusion (6 h). BT remained elevated to 26 [median, 14-45 min (1,3 quartile)] at 24 h, while groups 1 and 2 returned to normal values. Collagen-induced aggregation was 73% [median, 70-80% (1,3 quartile)] under YM337 alone, 79% [median, 72-80% (1,3 quartile)] under ASA + UFH and reduced only in group 3 to 24% [median, 18-29% (1,3 quartile)]. In both groups receiving active YM337, PAC1 expression showed a reduction to < 20% after 6 h of infusion. CD62 expression was not significantly affected by any treatment.

CONCLUSION

UFH and YM337 have strong synergistic effects on BT, while coadministration of ASA strongly augments inhibitory effects of YM337 on collagen-induced platelet aggregation.

Pharmacodynamic characterization of the interaction between abciximab or tirofiban with unfractionated or a low molecular weight heparin in healthy subjects

AIMS

The objective of our study was to define the interaction between either unfractionated heparin (UFH) or a low molecular weight heparin, reviparin (REV), and the pharmacodynamic profile of the GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists abciximab (ABC) or tirofiban (T).

METHODS

Two studies each containing 18 healthy subjects were performed, and all were pretreated with aspirin (ASA) for 3 days. Volunteers then received UFH (5000 IU bolus/infusion 7 IU kg(-1) h(-1) for 7 h, n = 6), REV (4200-anti-Xa-IU s.c., n = 6) or placebo (n = 6). One hour later, ABC (study I) or T (study II) were given by i.v. infusion for 6 h. The pharmacodynamic effects measured were bleeding time (BT), fibrinogen-binding at the GPIIb/IIIa-receptor (FIB), expression of the platelet secretion marker CD62, and ADP (20 microM)- and collagen (5 microg ml(-1))-induced platelet aggregation.

RESULTS

After treatment with both GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists, prolongation of BT occurred to a similar magnitude (approximately 25-30 min) and was not affected by UFH or REV-comedication. ABC or T with ASA alone resulted in nearly the same magnitude of reduction in FIB and platelet aggregation. After coadministration with UFH, FIB was significantly higher (thus less inhibited) than after after T + ASA alone (19 +/- 16% vs 55 +/- 36%) or ABC + ASA alone (8 +/- 9% vs 32 +/- 11%). This attenuation of FIB was not seen with REV. Inhibition of ADP-and collagen-induced aggregation tended to be attenuated by treatment with UFH (e.g. ADP-induced aggregation at 0.25 h after ABC + ASA alone =13 +/- 4%; after coadministration with UFH = 40 +/- 26%). No such changes were noted with REV. Minor reductions in CD62-expression were seen in subjects given ABC or T alone, but expression was not affected by UFH or REV.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-medication with UFH attenuated platelet inhibition during treatment with GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists, but these effects were not seen with the low molecular weight heparin reviparin. The results show that administration of reviparin together with abciximab or tirofiban did not adversely affect the pharmacodynamic profile of these GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists.

In vitro dose response to different GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists: inter-laboratory comparison of various platelet function tests

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-laboratory variation of the concentration-response to the GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists abciximab and eptifibatide on platelet aggregometry and to compare results with flow cytometric tests as well as the rapid platelet function analyser (RPFA).

METHODS

In five different laboratory sites, blood from three to five healthy donors was spiked with abciximab or eptifibatide, followed by the assessment of: (1) aggregometry (anticoagulant: sodium citrate 3.18% or hirudin 5 microg/ml); (2) flow cytometry (fibrinogen binding or PAC1-expression), or (3) RPFA. Dose-response curves were established on the basis of a sigmoidal Imax)-model [I=(Imax)*Cg)/(IC50g + Cg)].

RESULTS

For citrated blood, aggregation induced by 20 microM ADP was blocked up to 100% by both GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists, IC50 values varied between 0.11-0.22 microg/ml for eptifibatide and 1.25-2.3 microg/ml for abciximab. I(max) of the response to 5 microg/ml collagen ranged from 46% to 100%, and IC50 values varied between 0.28-0.34 microg/ml for eptifibatide and 2.3-3.8 microg/ml for abciximab. In hirudinized blood, IC50 values for eptifibatide were 1.5- to 3-fold higher than those obtained with citrated plasma. Inhibition of PAC1-expression by abciximab (IC50) 0.84 microg/ml) showed results similar those of the RPFA (approx. 1.0 microg/ml); larger differences between PAC1 and RPFA results were observed for eptifibatide. Based on aggregometry, eptifibatide concentrations for 80% inhibition varied from 0.27 to 0.55 microg/ml, and were considerably less when the RPFA was taken as basis (0.15 or 0.22 microg/ml). A similar pattern was observed for abciximab.

CONCLUSIONS

We found quite a low inter- and intra-laboratory variation in the in vitro pharmacodynamic characterization of GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists by aggregometry, making results of these tests obtained from different laboratories during clinical trials at least comparable. The RPFA exhibits a higher sensitivity to inhibitory GPIIb/IIIa-effects, in keeping with the "real" inhibition of the activated receptor (PAC1) as assessed with more elaborate flow cytometry.