The relationship between environment and mental health: How does geographic information systems (GIS) help?

Mental Health Care Access Using Geographic Information Systems: An Integrative Review

A decade after the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act was implemented to ensure access to mental health and substance abuse services for U.S. citizens, accessing mental health care still is problematic for many needing services. More than 123 million Americans reside in federally-designated Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas (MHPSA) compared to 84 million living in similarly-designated primary care shortage areas and 62 million in dental health shortage areas. Health professional shortage areas are geographic areas that have a shortage of primary medical, dental, or mental health providers. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with spatial analysis approaches provide tools to understand the ever-changing distribution of health care, outcomes, and delivery to improve care. The aim of this integrative review is to describe and synthesize the literature on GIS approaches to improve access to mental health care services. GIS Bibliography, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Oalster were searched for articles between January 1, 1998 and January 1, 2018 that met established inclusion/exclusion criteria. Among the 138 articles reviewed, 18 met criteria and were included in the review. GIS approaches to improve access to mental health care can be categorized as (1) type of care (integrated, community), (2) contributions to access (distance, time, cost, perception of traveling, inequalities), and (3) the utilization of services. Results from the literature suggest closer examination of measures used to assess geographic variations in accessibility is needed for ultimately improving quality of care for people in MHPSA.

Using Geospatial Research Methods to Examine Resource Accessibility and Availability as it Relates to Community Participation of Individuals with Serious Mental Illnesses

Greater community participation among individuals with serious mental illnesses is associated with better psychosocial and health outcomes. Typically, studies examining community participation have utilized self-report measures and been conducted in limited settings. The introduction of methodological advances to examining community participation of individuals with serious mental illnesses has the potential to advance the science of community mental health research and invigorate the work of community psychologists in this area. This study employed an innovative geospatial approach to examine the relationship between community participation and resource accessibility (i.e., proximity) and availability (i.e., concentration) among 294 individuals utilizing community mental health services throughout the United States. Findings suggest small but significant associations between community participation and the accessibility and availability of resources needed for participation. Furthermore, findings demonstrate the importance of car access for individuals residing in both urban and non-urban settings. The methods and results presented in this study have implications for community mental health research and services and provide an illustration of ways that geospatial methodologies can be used to investigate environmental factors that impact community inclusion and participation of individuals with serious mental illnesses.