Validating the Breathing Vigilance Questionnaire for use in dysfunctional breathing

Physiotherapy assessment of breathlessness and disordered patterns of breathing: Defining a consensus on terminology and assessment

Introduction: Abnormal breathing patterns unexplained by pathophysiology are typically referred to using terms including chronic breathlessness syndrome or complex breathlessness. Often patients with these conditions are referred to physiotherapy for an assessment of this breathlessness, where some are diagnosed with breathing pattern disorder (BrPD) or dysfunctional breathing (DB). The condition seen in physiotherapy occurs in at least 10% of the general population, increasing to 29-40% with coexisting conditions. Inconsistency in the nomenclature and physiotherapy assessment reduces recognition of the condition and hinders development in this area. Aims of the study: To establish expert physiotherapists' consensus on terminology to describe this condition and provide guidance for its physiotherapy assessment. Participants and methods: The opinions and experiences of ten respiratory physiotherapists, nine other clinicians (doctors, nurses, and speech and language therapists), and five patients diagnosed with BrPD were explored in focus groups or interviews regarding the terminology used and assessment experience. A second separate purposive sample of clinical expert physiotherapists (n = 11) took part in a nominal group technique (NGT) process to build consensus on the following questions: Question 1: What is your preferred term for this condition? Question 2: What are the most important assessment components to be included in all assessments? Results: One focus group (n = 10) and 14 interviews were completed. Framework analysis of the data from focus groups and interviews was undertaken and these results were shared with the participants in the nominal group. Consensus (71%) for the term breathing pattern disorder (BrPD) was achieved and an assessment guide was created. Conclusion: With improved consistency in its description and assessment, the adoption of breathing pattern disorder may help to further develop clinical and research priorities in this area within physiotherapy services.

Prevalence and characteristics of dysfunctional breathing in patients with asthma in the Japanese population

BACKGROUND

Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is a major asthma comorbidity; however, it is not well recognized in Japan. Moreover, it has rarely been reported in the asthma population, and its clinical characteristics are unclear. We aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of DB as a comorbidity in patients with asthma in Japan. Questionnaire surveys were conducted among patients with asthma at medical facilities in three regions of Japan (Niigata, Kumamoto, and Tokyo).

METHODS

This cross-sectional questionnaire survey targeting patients with asthma who had regularly visited medical institutions and their doctors was conducted from September to November 2021. The questionnaire addressed the control status and method of treatment. The diagnosis of DB was evaluated using the Nijmegen questionnaire (NQ).

RESULTS

There were 2087 eligible participants. Based on their NQ scores, 217 patients were classified into the DB group (NQ ≥ 19). There were significant differences with respect to sex, disease duration, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores, type-2 biomarkers, pulmonary function indices, treatment methods, severity, and asthma exacerbations in the previous year between the DB and non-DB groups. In the multivariate analysis, there were significant differences in sex, disease duration (≥15 y), ACT scores (<20), and PHQ-9 scores (≥10). The cluster analysis of cases with DB classified the population into four clusters.

CONCLUSIONS

The asthma population with DB exhibited several characteristics, including depression and poorly controlled asthma. Further large-scale interventional investigations with longer follow-up periods are necessary to verify these findings.

Validity study of the Japanese version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire for verifying dysfunctional breathing in Japanese asthma patients

Background

Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is a clinical condition characterized by irregular breathing patterns presenting a sensation of dyspnea and a feeling of chest tightness. DB is a known comorbidity of asthma that is difficult to control, leading to poor quality of life, so early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are essential to improve the clinical condition of asthma. The Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), developed to screen for DB and translated into various languages, is used worldwide. However, a Japanese NQ (JNQ) is unavailable, so DB has not been clinically verified in people with asthma in Japan.

Objective

This study aimed to prepare a JNQ, verify its reliability and validity, and demonstrate its clinical benefits in asthma treatment.

Methods

The JNQ was prepared by back-translating the NQ with the author's consent. The answers to self-administered questionnaires, including the JNQ, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ), and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), were obtained with the consent of 68 people with asthma (average age ± SD, 52.04 ± 12.43 years) who visited Nihon University Itabashi Hospital. The reliability of the JNQ was analyzed by the Cronbach alpha coefficient. A comparative test was conducted for each questionnaire (ACT, ACQ, Mini-AQLQ, PHQ-9), considering a JNQ score of 23 as the cutoff value. Patients with a score of 23 or more were assigned to the DB group, whereas patients with a score of less than 23 were assigned to the non-DB group. We analyzed the correlation between the JNQ and each questionnaire.

Results

The JNQ showed sufficient reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.875). Correlation analysis between the JNQ score and each questionnaire revealed negative correlations with the ACT score (r = 0.262) and Mini-AQLQ score (r = -0.453) and positive correlations with the ACQ score (r = 0.337) and PHQ-9 score (r = 0.539). All of these correlations were statistically significant. As a result of the comparative test, the DB and non-DB groups showed a significant difference in Mini-AQLQ (P = .023) and PHQ-9 (P = .003) scores. No significant difference was observed between ACT (P = .294) and ACQ (P = .177) scores.

Conclusions

The JNQ validates DB in Japanese people with asthma and reflects the deterioration of asthma control, decreased quality of life, and depression. Using the JNQ, early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention (eg, breathing exercises and a psychosomatic approach) for DB in people with asthma may help suppress the severity of asthma in Japan.

Validity and reliability of outcome measures to assess dysfunctional breathing: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically review the psychometric properties of outcome measures that assess dysfunctional breathing (DB) in adults.

METHODS

Studies on developing and evaluating measurement properties to assess DB were included. The study investigated the empirical research published between 1990 and February 2022, with an updated search in May 2023 in the Cochrane Library database of systematic reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Ovid Medline (full), the Ovid Excerta Medica Database, the Ovid allied and complementary medicines database, the Ebscohost Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. The included studies' methodological quality was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) risk of bias checklist. Data analysis and synthesis followed the COSMIN methodology for reviews of outcome measurement instruments.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 10 outcome measures were identified. The psychometric properties of these outcome measures were evaluated using COSMIN. The Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ) is the only outcome measure with 'sufficient' ratings for content validity, internal consistency, reliability and construct validity. All other outcome measures did not report characteristics of content validity in the patients' group.

DISCUSSION

The NQ showed high-quality evidence for validity and reliability in assessing DB. Our review suggests that using NQ to evaluate DB in people with bronchial asthma and hyperventilation syndrome is helpful. Further evaluation of the psychometric properties is needed for the remaining outcome measures before considering them for clinical use.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021274960.

Illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness in individuals living with advanced respiratory disease: an observational study

Background

Understanding the complexity and multidimensional nature of chronic breathlessness is key to its successful management. The aim of this study was to explore illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness in individuals living with advanced respiratory disease.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional secondary analysis of data from a feasibility randomised control trial (SELF-BREATHE) for individuals living with chronic breathlessness due to advanced disease. All participants completed the following questionnaires: numerical rating scale (NRS) breathlessness severity, NRS distress due to breathlessness, NRS self-efficacy for managing breathlessness, Dyspnea-12 (D-12), Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ), Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief IPQ) and the Cognitive and Behavioural Responses Questionnaire, short version (CBRQ-S). The associations between the Brief IPQ and CBRQ-S with NRS breathlessness severity, distress and self-efficacy, D-12 and CRQ were examined using Spearman's rho correlation coefficient rs. A Spearman's rs of ≥0.50 was predefined as the threshold to denote important associations between variables. A p-value of <0.008 was considered statistically significant, to account for the number of comparisons performed.

Results

The illness perception items consequences, identity, concern and emotional response were associated with increased breathlessness severity, increased distress, reduced breathlessness self-management ability and lower health-related quality of life. Symptom focusing and embarrassment avoidance were identified as important cognitive responses to chronic breathlessness.

Conclusion

Interventions that directly target illness perceptions, cognitive and behavioural responses to chronic breathlessness may improve symptom burden, self-efficacy and health-related quality of life.

Puzzled by dysfunctional breathing disorder(s)? Consider the Bayesian brain hypothesis!

There is currently growing clinical concern regarding dysfunctional breathing disorder(s) (DBD), an umbrella term for a set of multidimensional clinical conditions that are characterized by altered breathing pattern associated with a variety of intermittent or chronic symptoms, notably dyspnea, in the absence or in excess of, organic disease. However, several aspects of DBD remain poorly understood and/or open to debate, especially the inconsistent relationship between the array of experienced symptoms and their supposedly underlying mechanisms. This may be partly due to a more general problem, i.e., the prevailing way we conceptualize symptoms. In the present article, after a brief review of the different aspects of DBD from the current perspective, I submit a call for considering DBD under the innovating perspective of the Bayesian brain hypothesis, i.e., a potent and novel model that fundamentally changes our views on symptom perception.