MGOGP: a gene module-based heuristic algorithm for cancer-related gene prioritization

Ontologies and Knowledge Graphs in Oncology Research

The complexity of cancer research stems from leaning on several biomedical disciplines for relevant sources of data, many of which are complex in their own right. A holistic view of cancer—which is critical for precision medicine approaches—hinges on integrating a variety of heterogeneous data sources under a cohesive knowledge model, a role which biomedical ontologies can fill. This study reviews the application of ontologies and knowledge graphs in cancer research. In total, our review encompasses 141 published works, which we categorized under 14 hierarchical categories according to their usage of ontologies and knowledge graphs. We also review the most commonly used ontologies and newly developed ones. Our review highlights the growing traction of ontologies in biomedical research in general, and cancer research in particular. Ontologies enable data accessibility, interoperability and integration, support data analysis, facilitate data interpretation and data mining, and more recently, with the emergence of the knowledge graph paradigm, support the application of Artificial Intelligence methods to unlock new knowledge from a holistic view of the available large volumes of heterogeneous data.

A Survey of Gene Prioritization Tools for Mendelian and Complex Human Diseases

Modern high-throughput experiments provide us with numerous potential associations between genes and diseases. Experimental validation of all the discovered associations, let alone all the possible interactions between them, is time-consuming and expensive. To facilitate the discovery of causative genes, various approaches for prioritization of genes according to their relevance for a given disease have been developed. In this article, we explain the gene prioritization problem and provide an overview of computational tools for gene prioritization. Among about a hundred of published gene prioritization tools, we select and briefly describe 14 most up-to-date and user-friendly. Also, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of existing tools, challenges of their validation, and the directions for future research.

A rectified factor network based biclustering method for detecting cancer-related coding genes and miRNAs, and their interactions

Detecting cancer-related genes and their interactions is a crucial task in cancer research. For this purpose, we proposed an efficient method, to detect coding genes, microRNAs (miRNAs), and their interactions related to a particular cancer or a cancer subtype using their expression data from the same set of samples. Firstly, biclusters specific to a particular type of cancer are detected based on rectified factor networks and ranked according to their associations with general cancers. Secondly, coding genes and miRNAs in each bicluster are prioritized by considering their differential expression and differential correlation values, protein-protein interaction data, and potential cancer markers. Finally, a rank fusion process is used to obtain the final comprehensive rank by combining multiple ranking results. We applied our proposed method on breast cancer datasets. Results show that our method outperforms other methods in detecting breast cancer-related coding genes and miRNAs. Furthermore, our method is very efficient in computing time, which can handle tens of thousands genes/miRNAs and hundreds of patients in hours on a desktop. This work may aid researchers in studying the genetic architecture of complex diseases, and improving the accuracy of diagnosis.