A comparison of screening tests for detection of high-grade cervical abnormalities in women living with HIV from Cameroon

Improving the Sensitivity-Specificity Balance of Human Papillomavirus Testing on Self- and Clinician-Collected Samples in South Africa

PURPOSE

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected samples may increase coverage of cervical cancer screening, but previous studies have observed lower specificity of HPV testing in self- versus clinician-collected samples. Here we investigate strategies to improve the sensitivity-specificity balance of a round of HPV testing on self-collected samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women living with and without HIV, age 30-65 years, were recruited in South Africa. Self-collected vaginal samples and clinician-collected cervical samples were tested with Xpert HPV, an assay that detects the 14 high-risk HPV types in five separate channels: (P1) HPV 16; (P2) HPV 18, 45; (P3) HPV 31, 33, 35, 52, 58; (P4) HPV 51, 59; and (P5) HPV 39, 56, 66, 68. All women underwent colposcopy with histology sampling, and diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN2+) was determined by adjudicated pathology. The AUC and related performance parameters were calculated using logistic regression with the cycle threshold (Ct) values of the channels as predictors.

RESULTS

HPV prevalence in women without and with HIV was higher in self-collected (25.1% v 61.5%) than in clinician-collected samples (16.2% v 48.4%). The optimal model to predict CIN2+ used Ct values from the three channels that detect HPV 16, 18, 45, 31, 33, 35, 52, and/or 58. AUC was superior for testing on clinician-collected (0.908) than on self-collected samples (0.878; P = .0261) in women without HIV, as well as for women living with HIV (0.868 v 0.819; clinician v self; P = .0002). Alternate approaches to handling multiple types and sequential testing approaches did not allow self-testing to achieve equivalent performance to testing on clinician-collected samples.

CONCLUSION

Using more stringent Ct cutoffs on the three channels that detect the eight highest-risk HPV types can improve the sensitivity-specificity balance of a round of screening in both self- and clinician-collected samples. Although performance of HPV testing on self-collected samples is excellent, performance parameters are better on clinician-collected samples.

Performance characteristics of the point-of-care tests for HPV-based cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to conduct an updated and comprehensive summary of the sensitivity and specificity of three human papillomavirus (HPV) point-of-care (POC) tests (careHPV™, oncoE6™ cervical test, Xpert® HPV) to guide resource-constrained countries for their implementation in cervical cancer screening.

METHODS

Databases including Medline, Embase, Web of Science and cumulated index in nursing and allied health literature (CINAHL) were searched between January 2004 and October 2024. Observational studies analyzing the three tests for cervical cancer screening were included. Pooled estimates for the performance characteristics were calculated using random-effect models.

FINDINGS

Of the 3976 records, 33 studies were included. The sensitivity and specificity of careHPV™ for detection of CIN2+ lesions in self-collected samples were 75.6% and 85.6% compared to 86.4% and 80.4% for physician-collected samples. The sensitivity and specificity of OncoE6™ cervical test were 54.5% and 98.4%, respectively, for physician-collected samples. Xpert® HPV had a sensitivity and specificity of 91.5% and 56.5% in self-collected vaginal samples (SCSs), 92.3% and 53.3%, respectively, in physician-collected cervical samples.

INTERPRETATION

Both careHPV™ and Xpert® HPV have a good sensitivity and specificity as a POC cervical cancer screening method. These methods also hold potential for use on SCSs.

FUNDING

None.

Variables that impact HPV test accuracy during vaginal self collection workflow for cervical cancer screening

Vaginal self collection (SC) is safe and effective for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and can increase cervical cancer screening coverage for underserved women. To better understand the impact of SC methodology on HPV test outcomes, empirical testing was conducted using different swab collection workflows. Deposition of the collection swab into resuspension buffer resulted in a 2.4-cycle reduction in threshold detection of human beta-hemoglobin during PCR when compared to "swirl-and-toss". In addition, reducing the swab resuspension volume from 10 mL to 3 mL resulted in a 2.6-cycle reduction in threshold detection of human beta-globin. A systematic literature search (01/01/2020 to 08/02/2023) of Ovid Medline and Embase, followed by data extraction and analysis, was conducted to further assess the impact of resuspension volume on performance following SC. HPV test performance for SC, relative to clinician collection (CC), was calculated for detection of cervical pre-cancer. Data were stratified by the resuspension volume ratio of SC to CC being either ≥ 1.0 or < 1.0. SC with a volume ratio of ≥ 1.0 and < 1.0 had a relative ≥ CIN2 sensitivity of 92.0 % (95 % CI: 88.0, 96.0) and 97.0 % (95 % CI: 94.0, 100), respectively. Taken together, these results suggest that SC conditions can be modified to optimize sample recovery and performance, as part of cervical cancer screening.

High-risk human papillomavirus genotype distribution among women living with HIV; implication for cervical cancer prevention in a resource limited setting

BACKGROUND

For women living with HIV (WLHIV), the burden of persistent HPV infection, cervical pre-cancerous lesions and cancer have been demonstrated to be higher than among HIV-negative women. As Ghana and other lower-middle-income countries (LMIC) work toward developing national cervical cancer programmes, it is essential that local scientific evidence be provided to guide policy decisions, especially for such special populations. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of high-risk HPV genotype and related factors among WLHIV and its implication for the prevention of cervical cancer prevention efforts.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital in Ghana. WLHIV, aged 25-65 years, who met the eligibility criteria were recruited through a simple random sampling method. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to gather socio-demographic, behavioural, clinical and other pertinent information. The AmpFire HPV detection system (Atila BioSystem, Mointain View, CA was used to detect 15 high-risk HPV genotypes from self-collected cervico-vaginal samples. The data collected were exported to STATA 16.0 for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In all, 330 study participants, with mean age of 47.2 years (SD ± 10.7), were involved. Most (69.1%, n = 188/272) had HIV viral loads < 1000 copies/ml and 41.2% (n = 136) had ever heard of cervical screening. The overall hr-HPV prevalence was 42.7% (n = 141, 95% CI 37.4-48.1) and the five commonest hr-HPV types among screen positives were HPV59 (50.4%), HPV18 (30.5%), HPV35 (26.2%), HPV58 (17%) and HPV45 (14.9%). Most infected women (60.3%, n = 85) had multiple hr-HPV infections, with about 57.4% (n = 81) having 2-5 h-HPV types, while 2.8% (n = 4) had more than five hr-HPV types. A total of 37.6% (n = 53) had HPV16 and/or18, while 66.0% (n = 93) had the hr-HPV genotypes covered by the nonavalent vaccine. Women with HIV viral load ≥ 1000copies/ml (AOR = 5.58, 95% CI 2.89-10.78, p < 0.001) had a higher likelihood of being co-infected.

CONCLUSION

This study found out that the prevalence of hr-HPV still remains high in women with HIV, with a notable occurrence of multiple infections and infection with genotypes 16 and/or18. Additionally, an association was established between hr-HPV and infection HIV viral load.. Therefore, comprehensive HIV care for these women should include awareness of cervical cancer, consideration of vaccination and implementation of screening and follow-up protocols. National programmes in LMIC, such as Ghana, should consider using HPV-based screen-triage-treat approach with partial genotyping.

Comparison of human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening strategies in Tanzania among women with and without HIV

Cervical cancer is the most common female cancer in Eastern Africa, and the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening as a key element to eliminate the disease. In this cross-sectional study from Tanzania, we compared nine HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategies, including HPV testing at standard cut-off; HPV testing at increased viral load cut-offs; HPV testing with partial/extended genotyping, and HPV testing with visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). We pooled data collected during 2008 to 2009 and 2015 to 2017 from 6851 women aged 25 to 65. Cervical cytology samples were HPV tested with Hybrid Capture 2, and HPV positive samples were genotyped with INNO-LiPA Extra II. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing and VIA were done according to local standards. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of screening strategies, with high-grade cytological lesions as reference, separately for women with and without HIV. HPV testing at standard cut-off (1.0 relative light units [RLU]) had highest sensitivity (HIV+: 97.8%; HIV-: 91.5%), but moderate specificity (HIV+: 68.1%; HIV-: 85.7%). Increasing the cut-off for HPV positivity to higher viral loads (5.0/10.0 RLU) increased specificity (HIV+: 74.2%-76.5%; HIV-: 89.5%-91.2%), with modest sensitivity reductions (HIV+: 91.3%-95.7%; HIV-: 83.5%-87.8%). Limiting test positivity to HPV types 16/18/31/33/35/45/52/58 improved specificity while maintaining high sensitivity (HIV+: 90.2%; HIV-: 81.1%). Triage with VIA and/or partial genotyping for HPV16/18 or HPV16/18/45 had low sensitivities (≤65%). In conclusion, HPV testing alone, or HPV testing with extended genotyping or increased viral load cut-offs, may improve cervical cancer screening in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Modelling cervical cancer elimination using single-visit screening and treatment strategies in the context of high HIV prevalence: estimates for KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

INTRODUCTION

In settings with high HIV prevalence, cervical cancer incidence rates are up to six-fold higher than the global average of 13.1 cases per 100,000 women-years. To inform strategies for global cervical cancer elimination, we used a dynamic transmission model to evaluate scalable screening and treatment strategies, accounting for HIV-associated cancer risks and weighing prevention gains against overtreatment.

METHODS

We developed a dynamic model of HIV-HPV co-infection and disease progression, which we calibrated to KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Our baseline scenario reflects the current practice of HPV vaccination with a multi-visit screening and treatment strategy involving cytology and colposcopy triage. We evaluated 13 comparator scenarios with increased vaccination coverage and one-time, two-time or repeat HIV-targeted cervical cancer screening with the following single-visit strategies: HPV DNA testing, HPV genotyping, automated visual evaluation (AVE) and HPV DNA with AVE triage. In all scenarios, HIV antiretroviral therapy, condom use and voluntary male medical circumcision continue at baseline levels. We simulated cancer incidence under each scenario from 2020 to 2120 using the 25 best-fitting parameter sets. We present the median and range of model output from these simulations to account for parameter uncertainty.

RESULTS

We estimate that cervical cancer incidence will decrease by 87% with the continuation of current cervical cancer and HIV prevention strategies, from an age-standardized rate per 100,000 women of 80.4 (range 58.2, 112.1) in 2020 to 10.7 (4.2, 29.9) in 2120. Scenarios scaling up vaccination and single-visit strategies resulted in near- and long-term gains. With repeat HIV-targeted screening, incidence rates were projected to be 29-34% lower in 2030 relative to the baseline scenario, and elimination (incidence <4/100,000) was achieved with HPV DNA testing in 2095 and with AVE in 2114. A strategy of HPV DNA with AVE triage optimized the tradeoff between cancer cases averted and overtreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-visit screening strategies could avert a substantial burden of cervical cancer and accelerate progress towards elimination in settings with a high burden of HIV. Increasing the screening frequency among women with HIV and reducing loss-to-follow-up for treatment will be key components of a successful elimination strategy.

Cervical cancer prevention and control in women living with human immunodeficiency virus

Despite being highly preventable, cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer and cause of cancer death in women globally. In low-income countries, cervical cancer is often the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome are at a particularly high risk of cervical cancer because of an impaired immune response to human papillomavirus, the obligate cause of virtually all cervical cancers. Globally, approximately 1 in 20 cervical cancers is attributable to HIV; in sub-Saharan Africa, approximately 1 in 5 cervical cancers is due to HIV. Here, the authors provide a critical appraisal of the evidence to date on the impact of HIV disease on cervical cancer risk, describe key methodologic issues, and frame the key outstanding research questions, especially as they apply to ongoing global efforts for prevention and control of cervical cancer. Expanded efforts to integrate HIV care with cervical cancer prevention and control, and vice versa, could assist the global effort to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem.