Bhushan R, Martens J. Generic pharmaceuticals, regulatory aspects, bioequivalence investigation, and perception.
Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024;
23:177-186. [PMID:
38221892 DOI:
10.1080/14740338.2024.2305709]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The objective and significance of the topic is to draw attention toward regulatory aspects (and pharmacopoeias) for bioequivalence investigation, and perception for generic pharmaceuticals, especially their stereoselective bioequivalence evaluation for understanding the performance of the racemic generic products available in the market.
AREAS COVERED
The areas covered include bioequivalence studies (and related USP and FDA requirements) on certain generic APIs for comparison, examples of concern related to inspection of pharmaceuticals for export/import. Literature methodology includes search through USP monographs, MDPI.com, msn.com, WHO Drug Information, certain specific web links, PubMed Central®, PubMed®, NLM's advanced biomedical information services, and several pdf published in relevant journals in the field for related authentic information.
EXPERT OPINION
The USP, the USFDA, and the units alike internationally should enforce pharmaceutical companies to perform stereoselective investigations on generic APIs to show that their PK/PD parameters are (nearly) equal to the standards set by such units for allowing marketing of that API. This should be provided to professionals in the areas of patient care and every country should enforce such regulations at the time of export and import of generics.
Collapse