Interactions of ligands at angiotensin II-receptors and imidazoline receptors

Centrally acting drug moxonidine decreases reactive oxygen species via inactivation of the phosphoinositide-3 kinase signaling in the rostral ventrolateral medulla in hypertensive rats

OBJECTIVE

Centrally acting antihypertensive action of moxonidine is a result of activation of Imidazoline-1 receptor (I1R) in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM). Hypertension shows an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the RVLM. The present objective was to determine the phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway involved in the effect of moxonidine on ROS generation in the RVLM of spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR).

METHODS

Wistar-Kyoto rats and SHR received intracisternal infusion (2 weeks) of tested agents which were subjected to subsequent experiments. In-situ ROS in the RVLM was evaluated by the oxidative fluorescence dye. Western blot and PCR analysis were performed to detect the expression levels of PI3K signaling pathway. Lentivirus was injected bilaterally into the RVLM for silencing PI3K signaling.

RESULTS

ROS production in the RVLM was dose-dependently reduced in SHRs treated with infusion of moxonidine (20 nmol/day), which was prevented by the I1R antagonist efaroxan but not by the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine. Moxonidine pretreatment significantly blunted cardiovascular sensitivity to injection of tempol (5 nmol) or angiotensin II (10 pmol) into the RVLM in SHR. Expression levels of PI3K/Akt, nuclear factor kappa-B (NFκB), NADPHase (NOX4), and angiotensin type I receptor (AT1R) in the RVLM were markedly decreased in SHR treated with moxonidine. Infection of lentivirus containing PI3K shRNA in the RVLM effectively prevented effects of moxonidine on cardiovascular activity and expression levels of Akt, NFκB, NOX4, and AT1R.

CONCLUSION

The centrally antihypertensive drug moxonidine decreases ROS production in the RVLM through inactivation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in hypertension.

Modification of noradrenaline release in pithed spontaneously hypertensive rats by I1-binding sites in addition to alpha2-adrenoceptors

It is known that moxonidine acts as an agonist at presynaptic alpha(2)-adrenoceptors of the postganglionic sympathetic nerve terminals and leads to a reduction in noradrenaline release. In addition, it is conceivable that I(1)-binding sites located in other regions of the pre- and postganglionic sympathetic neurons are involved in this effect. Our aim was to investigate whether and to what extent activation of the I(1)-binding sites contributes to the moxonidine-induced inhibition of noradrenaline release. Noradrenaline release was induced in pithed spontaneously hypertensive rats (pretreated with phenoxybenzamine/desipramine at 10/0.5 mg/kg) by stimulation of sympathetic overflow from the spinal cord. Noradrenaline overflow was reduced using moxonidine (0.18, 0.6, and 1.8 mg/kg) by 39.4, 70.4, or 78.7%, respectively, even when all alpha(1)-/alpha(2)-adrenoceptors were blocked effectively by phenoxybenzamine. In contrast, the I(1)-antagonist efaroxan (0.1, 1, and 3 mg/kg) increased noradrenaline overflow from 453 (control) to 1710, 1999, or 2754 pg/ml, suggesting an autoreceptor-like function of I(1)-binding sites. In consequence, moxonidine (0.18, 0.6, and 1.8 mg/kg) reduced the increase in noradrenaline overflow in efaroxan-treated animals (1 mg/kg) by 22.7, 41.7, and 50.5%, respectively. Agmatine (6 and 60 mg/kg), an endogenous agonist at I(1)-binding sites, reduced noradrenaline overflow (-36 or 53%), even under alpha(2)-adrenoceptor blockade. When 2-endo-amino-3-exo-isopropylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptane (AGN192403) (10 mg/kg) was injected, a selective blocker of I(1)-binding sites, noradrenaline overflow was not influenced by agmatine. It is concluded that moxonidine reduces noradrenaline overflow by acting at I(1)-binding sites in addition to its agonistic property at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. The exact location of the I(1)-binding sites on the pre- or postsynaptic sympathetic neurons is unknown, but the location in the pre- or postsynaptic membrane of the sympathetic ganglion is the most plausible explanation.