Primary semi-constrained arthroplasty for chronic fracture-dislocations of the elbow

A Novel Approach to Treat a Rare Case of Interprosthetic Humeral Fracture with Osteosynthesis and Combined Grafting: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Interprosthetic humeral fractures (IHFs) are severe injury patterns associated with surgical issues and contradictory results. The knowledge and literature on this topic are still lacking. A 76 year-old woman was treated for a fracture occurred between the shoulder and elbow stemmed prosthesis. Severe bone loss was associated with the fracture. Treatment: Open reduction, plate fixation, and bone grafting were considered. A xenograft (used as a mechanical strut medially), a synthetic graft associated with bone growth factors, and scaffolds improved the bone healing process. Satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes were obtained. A scoping review of the literature was also performed by the authors. Only eight papers reported IHFs with a low level of evidence. In total, eight patients were treated; one paper that reported on biomechanical aspects using finite element analysis is discussed. Conservative treatment leads to non-union, and the surgical approach is the gold standard. The osteosynthesis technique associated with bone grafting leads to the best outcomes. The use of a xenograft mechanical strut, associated with synthetic biological bone grafting, led to complete bone union at 9 months follow-up. Larger cohorts, more standardised results, and multicentric studies are mandatory in order to improve and establish a management and treatment algorithm.

Neglected posterior dislocation of elbow: A review

Untreated traumatic posterior dislocation of the elbow joint, 3 weeks or older, is defined as "neglected posterior dislocation of the elbow". Around 90% of these are of posterolateral type. These are much more common in the developing and underdeveloped countries. Patients presents with a deformed, stiff and painful elbow with difficulty to perform activities of daily living. The clinical picture looks quite similar to malunited supracondylar fracture of the elbow. Diagnosis is usually confirmed radiographically. CT and MRI scan give additional information and are recommended before embarking on surgery. Treatment is quite challenging due to the significant soft tissue contractures, ligamentous insufficiencies and fibrosis, with possible associated nerve injuries, myositis ossificans, non-compliant patients and the need for long-term postoperative physiotherapy. Goal of surgical treatment is to achieve a painless, stable and mobile elbow with a congruent joint space. We have reviewed the literature and present our view on the prognosis and recommended surgical technique to treat this condition.

Intramedullary fibula strut bone allograft in a periprosthetic humeral shaft fracture with implant loosening after total elbow arthroplasty

Periprosthetic fracture after total elbow replacement surgery is a difficult complication to manage, especially when it comes together with implant loosening. If stem revision and internal fixation of the periprosthetic fracture are performed simultaneously, this would be a very challenging procedure. Most of total elbow replacement implants are cemented type. Cement usage at periprosthetic fracture site may interfere healing of fractured site. Authors underwent internal fixation with use of locking plate and cerclage wire for periprosthetic fracture, allogenous fibular strut bone inserted into the humerus intramedullary canal allowing the fractured site to be more stable without cement usage. At 10-month follow-up, the complete union and good clinical outcome was achieved. We present a novel technique for treating periprosthetic fracture with implant loosening after total elbow replacement surgery, using intramedullary allogenous fibula strut bone graft.

Chronic complex persistent elbow instability: a consecutive and prospective case series and review of recent literature

BACKGROUND

Chronic complex persistent elbow instability (CCPEI) is a condition that even expert elbow surgeons find challenging to treat. The results of the few studies that have dealt with the treatment of this condition are conflicting. We describe the surgical results of a consecutive prospective series of patients with CCPEI and provide a review of the recent literature.

METHODS

We assessed 21 patients with previous failed surgical or conservative treatment, with a terrible-triad injury in 13, Monteggia-like lesion in 6, humeral shear fracture-dislocation in 1, and radial head fracture-dislocation in 1. Overall, 21 open débridement procedures, 15 ulnar nerve transpositions, 6 ulnar in situ neurolysis procedures, 7 total elbow arthroplasties, 8 radial head arthroplasties, 1 radial head resection with humeroradial anconeus interpositional arthroplasty, 4 coronoid graft reconstructions, 14 ligament retensioning procedures, 3 ulnar nonunion treatments, and 2 ulnar osteotomies were performed. Two dynamic external fixators were applied. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score, quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were used preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 29.4 months. A significant improvement was found between preoperative and postoperative clinical scores and range-of-motion values. The reintervention and major complication rates were 19% and 23%, respectively. Arthritic evolution was observed in 71% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

CCPEI is a challenging condition with an uncertain prognosis. The variability in patients' pathoanatomic conditions requires customized surgical treatment aimed at elbow stabilizer reconstruction when the ulnohumeral joint is preserved or aimed at joint replacement in case of severe articular degeneration. The time interval between the initial trauma and index surgical procedure significantly affects the feasibility of reconstructive procedures.

Cementation technique for elbow arthroplasty; an international survey

Background

Modern cementation techniques have markedly improved survivorship in lower limb arthroplasty, which have been heavily researched in the hip and knee but less so for upper limb procedures. Aseptic loosening is a leading cause of failure in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) which could be related to the quality of cementation. The aim of this study was to investigate the cementation techniques used for TEA among practicing elbow surgeons.

Methods

An electronic questionnaire was emailed to members of the British elbow and shoulder society (BESS) and PubMed identified experts. Questions focused on the type of prosthesis, operative rates for elective and trauma cases, nature of cement used, canal preparation and cement insertion. Opinions regarding satisfaction with current techniques and mantle quality were also collected.

Results

A total of 26 surgeons completed the questionnaire. The Coonrad-Moorey was the most popular device amongst respondents. Most cemented both components, used antibiotic loaded cement, washed the canal with saline and inserted the cement retrograde. There was wide variation in cementation techniques used for the humerus and ulna, particularly regarding cement preparation, insertion, and use of a restrictor and pressurisation.

Conclusion

Modern cementation techniques are not being utilised in TEA which could be contributing to implant loosening rates and longevity.

Why does total elbow arthroplasty fail today? A systematic review of recent literature

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty is a relatively uncommon type of arthroplasty, which has undergone several design changes in the past four decades. However, research on improvement requires knowledge of failure mechanisms that can be addressed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review on modes of failure of total elbow arthroplasty.

METHODS

We conducted searches on PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify studies describing modes of failure of primary total elbow arthroplasties. The results were coupled per type of total elbow arthroplasty and individual arthroplasty models.

RESULTS

A total of 70 articles were included in this systematic review. 9308 individual total elbow arthroplasties were identified with 1253 revisions (13.5%). Aseptic loosening was the most prevalent reason for revision (38%), followed by deep infection (19%) and periprosthetic fractures (12%).

CONCLUSION

Revision rates have been found similar to a systematic review published in 2003. The revision percentage of total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis is significantly higher than for trauma and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Aseptic loosening was seen less in linked implants. Infections and periprosthetic fractures did not differ between linkage design groups. Aseptic loosening remains the most frequent cause for revision of primary total elbow arthroplasty. Therefore, more research on the occurrence, progression and risk factors of aseptic loosening should be performed and lead to higher implant survival.

Chronic Elbow Dislocation: Evaluation and Management

Chronic elbow dislocation is defined as a dislocation that has remained unreduced for >2 weeks. The soft-tissue and skeletal changes that develop during this time usually prevent successful closed reduction. These changes include the development of extensive intra-articular fibrotic tissue, as well as contracture of the triceps, collateral ligaments, and elbow capsule. Ulnar nerve involvement and associated fractures may also be present. Because treatment of chronic elbow dislocation is challenging, a stepwise approach is used in the evaluation and management of this condition. No large series of data are available to guide treatment. Most patients are treated on the basis of the surgeon's anecdotal experience. Treatment typically involves open reduction, often with the use of hinged external fixators. The role of triceps lengthening or primary collateral ligament reconstruction remains a topic of debate.

Is total elbow arthroplasty indicated in the treatment of traumatic sequelae? 19 cases of Coonrad-Morrey(®) reviewed at a mean follow-up of 5.2 years

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic sequelae of the elbow are difficult to manage because of bone deformities, changes in joint congruency and bone defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total elbow arthroplasty is a therapeutic option when the joint space has disappeared. Nineteen patients underwent semi-constrained Coonrad-Morrey(®) total elbow arthroplasty in 12 cases for post-traumatic elbow arthritis (group 1) and in seven cases for 7 non-union of the distal humerus (group 2). The mean age at surgery was 60 years old (56 in group 1 and 67 in group 2). The mean delay between the initial trauma and arthroplasty was 16 years (group 1) and 22 months (group 2).

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (24-156 months) in group 1, the Quick-DASH score was 34 points with outcomes that were considered to be good to excellent in 75% of the cases according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). A progressive radiolucency was identified on X-ray in 33% of the cases, and moderate wear of the polyethylene insert in 17%. There were 7 complications (58%) requiring revision in 3 cases (25%). At a mean follow-up of 4.6 years (24-108 months) in group 2, the Quick-DASH score was 39 points with good and excellent results in 86% according to the MEPS. A radiolucency was noted in 28% and moderate wear of the inserts in 14%. There were 2 complications (28%) requiring revision in 1 case (14%).

CONCLUSION

Semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasties provide recovery of functional range of motion with a stable and pain-free elbow for post-traumatic conditions. The age at surgery is a risk factor for complications. The indication for total elbow arthroplasty in patients under 60 should be carefully considered in relation to alternative treatment options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV Retrospective study.

Treatment of chronically unreduced complex dislocations of the elbow

Chronic dislocation of the elbow is an exceedingly disabling condition associated with severe instability, limitation of elbow function and significant pain. Due to the potentially conflicting goals of restoring elbow stability and regaining a satisfactory arc of motion, successful treatment is a challenge for the experienced trauma surgeon. We report our treatment strategy in three patients suffering from chronically unreduced fracture-dislocations of the elbow. The treatment protocol consists of in situ neurolysis of the ulnar nerve, distraction and reduction of the joint using unilateral hinged external fixation and repair of the osseous stabilizers. A stable elbow was achieved in all patients, without the need of reconstruction of the collateral ligaments. At final follow-up, the average extension/flexion arc of motion was 107 degrees (range, from 100 degrees to 110 degrees ). The average MEPI score at follow-up was 93, and the average DASH score was 19. This is a promising treatment protocol for the treatment of chronically unreduced complex elbow dislocations to restore elbow stability and regain an excellent functional outcome.

Total elbow arthroplasty for the treatment of insufficient distal humeral fractures. A retrospective clinical study and review of the literature

Treatment of complex distal humeral fractures in older patients with osteopenic bone remains a major surgical challenge. We report the results of 11 patients over 75 years of age who underwent semiconstrained sloppy-hinge total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) due to comminuted intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus. There were 9 women and 2 men with a mean age of 79.6 years. The mean duration of follow up was 2.8 years. According to AO classification, there were 8 type C3 and 3 type C2 fractures. The mean time from injury to operation was 4.3 days and the mean length of hospital stay was 9.8 days. The elbow flexion/extension and forearm pronation/supination arc of motion averaged 107(0) and 121(0) respectively. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 90 points, equivalent to excellent result. One patient sustained a periprosthetic humeral fracture and signs of non-progressive radiolucency were found in 8 out of the 11 elbows. Our search in the English and International literature revealed 9 other clinical studies describing the results of TEA in 167 patients with 168 distal humeral fractures. The mean age of patients varied from 69 to 84.6 years and the mean follow up from 17.8 months to 7 years. The mean MEPS among the studies was between 85 and 95 points. Wound infection was diagnosed in 9 cases (5.4%) but component removal and subsequent reimplantation was only applied in 3 elbows (1.8%). Partial ulnar nerve lesions were reported in 11 patients (6.5%) and reflex sympathetic dystrophy was developed in 5 patients (3%). In 3 elbows (1.8%) a periprosthetic fracture after a fall was recorded. Radiolucent lines between the cement mantle and bone interface were described in 24 cases (14.3%) but the majority of them (17 cases) were stable and asymptomatic. In conclusion, TEA constitutes a viable treatment option for the complex distal humeral fractures in elderly and medically compromised patients. Careful patient selection and regular follow up evaluation are mandatory for achieving an optimal result and eliminating the risks of mismanagement and early implant failure.

Effectiveness of revision following linked versus unlinked total elbow arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate the implications of unlinked and linked designs on the survivorship of revision surgery.

METHODS

Between 1972 and 1990, 352 linked and 151 unlinked prostheses were inserted at our institution. One-hundred and twenty-two elbows (24%) underwent subsequent revision: 55 linked (16%) and 67 unlinked (44%). Survivorship of the initial and revision total elbow replacement was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Comparisons were made between revisions done after a failed primary linked or unlinked designs. The unlinked revised to a linked device was more reliable than when revised to another unlinked device: 1 year survival 84% compared to 47%.

RESULTS

Initial survival was 56% at 367 months and 84% at 371 months for the unlinked and linked cohorts, respectively (P < .001). A second revision was required in 12 of the 35 elbows (30%) in the linked cohort and 14 of the 50 elbows (28%) in the unlinked.

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, primary linked implants display significantly better long-term survivorship (P < .001) than did the unlinked designs. Unlinked designs are most reliably converted to a linked implant.

Chronically unreduced elbow dislocations

This article focuses on various methods to treat the chronically unreduced elbow. There are only a few small series published in the literature on which to base treatment options. Anatomic features pertinent to the discussion of the chronically unstable elbow are highlighted. The spectrum of treatment options includes open reduction, internal fixation and ligament reconstruction, external fixation, and elbow arthroplasty. The indications, operative technique, and results of each treatment modality are explored.

Management of the flail elbow

Flail elbow is a relatively uncommon cause of elbow dysfunction. It is defined as the inability to position the arm in space for useful elbow function because of structural or neurologic inadequacies. Patient function is often severely compromised and treatment options are limited with moderate levels of success depending on etiology. This article reviews the various etiologies of dysfunctional elbow instability, their treatment options, and their expected outcomes.

Endoprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus following resection of bone tumours

Between 1988 and 2006, 18 patients had a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal humerus for bone tumours at our institution. There were 11 primary malignant neoplasms, six secondary deposits, and one benign aggressive tumour. The mean follow-up was for 4.4 years (1 to 18.2). Complications occurred in nine patients and included aseptic loosening in three (16.6%), local recurrence in two (11%), infection in two (11%), neuropraxia of the radial nerve in one (5.5%) and a peri-prosthetic fracture in one (5.5%). Excision was inadequate in four patients (22%), all of which developed local recurrence and/or metastases. There were seven deaths from the primary disease after a mean of 2.3 years (1 to 5), one of whom had an above-elbow amputation for local recurrence seven months before death. The remaining six had satisfactory elbow function at their last follow-up. The 11 living patients were evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society and Toronto Extremity Salvage scoring systems. The mean scores achieved were 76% (67% to 87%) and 73% (59% to 79%), respectively. Overall, 17 of 18 patients had significant improvement in the degree of their pain following operation.

Custom-made endoprosthetic reconstruction of the elbow for bone tumours is a viable treatment in carefully selected patients. It maintains satisfactory function and provides good pain relief.