1
|
Batchelor J, Hemmert C, Meulenbroeks I, Tang C, Harrison R, Ogrin R, Baillie A, Sarkies M. Factors Influencing the Translation of Evidence Into Clinical Practice for Hospital Allied Health Professionals in Terms of the Domains of Behaviour Change Theory: A Systematic Review. Eval Health Prof 2024:1632787241285993. [PMID: 39313220 DOI: 10.1177/01632787241285993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
This systematic review provides an overview of the unique challenges allied health professions face in the translation and implementation of evidence into practice, which remain relatively under reported and uninformed by a theoretical basis of behaviour change. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus databases from 2010 to 2022 were searched for primary study designs resulting in 21 articles included in this review (PROSPERO: 2022 CRD42022314996). Allied health disciplines reported in the review were mainly from occupational therapy, physiotherapy, dietetics, and speech pathology. The most frequently reported implementation determinants across the Theoretical Domains Framework were identified as 'environmental context and resources', and 'knowledge'. The results also identified a greater influence of 'social influences' and 'beliefs about consequences' in implementation. Implementing evidence into clinical practice is a multifaceted, complex process, and the use of the Theoretical Domains Framework provided a systematic approach to understanding the drivers behind the target behaviours. However, there is a paucity of studies across the allied health professions that describe implementation strategies used and their impact. Many of the studies focused on implementation by the individual clinician rather than the role organizations can play in the translation of evidence into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cameron Hemmert
- University of Sydney, Australia
- Implementation Science Academy, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew Baillie
- University of Sydney, Australia
- Implementation Science Academy, Australia
| | - Mitchell Sarkies
- University of Sydney, Australia
- Implementation Science Academy, Australia
- Macquarie University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siminiuc D, Gumuskaya O, Mitchell R, Bell J, Cameron ID, Hallen J, Birkenhead K, Hurring S, Baxter B, Close J, Sheehan KJ, Johansen A, Chehade MJ, Sherrington C, Balogh ZJ, Taylor ME, Sarkies M. Rehabilitation after surgery for hip fracture - the impact of prompt, frequent and mobilisation-focused physiotherapy on discharge outcomes: an observational cohort study. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:629. [PMID: 39044173 PMCID: PMC11264512 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05206-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the relationship between three postoperative physiotherapy activities (time to first postoperative walk, activity on the day after surgery, and physiotherapy frequency), and the outcomes of hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination after hip fracture. METHODS A cohort study was conducted on 437 hip fracture surgery patients aged ≥ 50 years across 36 participating hospitals from the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry Acute Rehabilitation Sprint Audit during June 2022. Study outcomes included hospital LOS and discharge destination. Generalised linear and logistic regressions were used respectively, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS Of 437 patients, 62% were female, 56% were aged ≥ 85 years, 23% were previously living in a residential aged care facility, 48% usually walked with a gait aid, and 38% were cognitively impaired prior to their injury. The median acute and total LOS were 8 (IQR 5-13) and 20 (IQR 8-38) days. Approximately 71% (n = 179/251) of patients originally living in private residence returned home and 29% (n = 72/251) were discharged to a residential aged care facility. Previously mobile patients had a higher total LOS if they walked day 2-3 (10.3 days; 95% CI 3.2, 17.4) or transferred with a mechanical lifter or did not get out of bed day 1 (7.6 days; 95% CI 0.6, 14.6) compared to those who walked day 1 postoperatively. Previously mobile patients from private residence had a reduced odds of return to private residence if they walked day 2-3 (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.17, 0.87), day 4 + (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15, 0.96), or if they only sat, stood or stepped on the spot day 1 (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.13, 0.62) when compared to those who walked day 1 postoperatively. Among patients from private residence, each additional physiotherapy session per day was associated with a -2.2 (95% CI -3.3, -1.0) day shorter acute LOS, and an increased log odds of return to private residence (OR 1.76; 95% CI 1.02, 3.02). CONCLUSION Hip fracture patients who walked earlier, were more active day 1 postoperatively, and/or received a higher number of physiotherapy sessions were more likely to return home after a shorter LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Siminiuc
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Level 7 D18Western Avenue NSW 2006, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Oya Gumuskaya
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Level 7 D18Western Avenue NSW 2006, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jack Bell
- Allied Health Research Collaborative, The Prince Charles Hospital, QLD, 4032, Chermside, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health Districtand, University of Sydney, NSW, 2064, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Jamie Hallen
- Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, NSW, 2031, Randwick, Australia
| | - Karen Birkenhead
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Level 7 D18Western Avenue NSW 2006, Camperdown, Australia
- Implementation Science Academy, Sydney Health Partners, NSW, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Sarah Hurring
- Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Brett Baxter
- Physiotherapy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, QLD, 4102, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Close
- Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, NSW, 2031, Randwick, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, NSW, 2052, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katie J Sheehan
- Bone & Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Antony Johansen
- School of Medicine, University Hospital of Walesand, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mellick J Chehade
- Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
| | - Catherine Sherrington
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydneyand, Sydney Local Health District, Gadigal Land, NSW, 2006, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health and, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Gadigal Land, NSW, 2006, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zsolt J Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, Trauma and Injury Research Program, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, NSW, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Morag E Taylor
- Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, NSW, 2031, Randwick, Australia
| | - Mitchell Sarkies
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Level 7 D18Western Avenue NSW 2006, Camperdown, Australia.
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Sydney, Australia.
- Implementation Science Academy, Sydney Health Partners, NSW, Camperdown, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clark EC, Burnett T, Blair R, Traynor RL, Hagerman L, Dobbins M. Strategies to implement evidence-informed decision making at the organizational level: a rapid systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:405. [PMID: 38561796 PMCID: PMC10983660 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10841-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achievement of evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) requires the integration of evidence into all practice decisions by identifying and synthesizing evidence, then developing and executing plans to implement and evaluate changes to practice. This rapid systematic review synthesizes evidence for strategies for the implementation of EIDM across organizations, mapping facilitators and barriers to the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation, behaviour) model for behaviour change. The review was conducted to support leadership at organizations delivering public health services (health promotion, communicable disease prevention) to drive change toward evidence-informed public health. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases and by reviewing publications of key authors. Articles that describe interventions to drive EIDM within teams, departments, or organizations were eligible for inclusion. For each included article, quality was assessed, and details of the intervention, setting, outcomes, facilitators and barriers were extracted. A convergent integrated approach was undertaken to analyze both quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS Thirty-seven articles are included. Studies were conducted in primary care, public health, social services, and occupational health settings. Strategies to implement EIDM included the establishment of Knowledge Broker-type roles, building the EIDM capacity of staff, and research or academic partnerships. Facilitators and barriers align with the COM-B model for behaviour change. Facilitators for capability include the development of staff knowledge and skill, establishing specialized roles, and knowledge sharing across the organization, though staff turnover and subsequent knowledge loss was a barrier to capability. For opportunity, facilitators include the development of processes or mechanisms to support new practices, forums for learning and skill development, and protected time, and barriers include competing priorities. Facilitators identified for motivation include supportive organizational culture, expectations for new practices to occur, recognition and positive reinforcement, and strong leadership support. Barriers include negative attitudes toward new practices, and lack of understanding and support from management. CONCLUSION This review provides a comprehensive analysis of facilitators and barriers for the implementation of EIDM in organizations for public health, mapped to the COM-B model for behaviour change. The existing literature for strategies to support EIDM in public health illustrates several facilitators and barriers linked to realizing EIDM. Knowledge of these factors will help senior leadership develop and implement EIDM strategies tailored to their organization, leading to increased likelihood of implementation success. REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022318994.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Clark
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Trish Burnett
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Rebecca Blair
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Robyn L Traynor
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Leah Hagerman
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Maureen Dobbins
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada.
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre, 2J20, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
King O, West E, Alston L, Beks H, Callisaya M, Huggins CE, Murray M, Mc Namara K, Pang M, Payne W, Peeters A, Pithie M, Sayner AM, Wong Shee A. Models and approaches for building knowledge translation capacity and capability in health services: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2024; 19:7. [PMID: 38287351 PMCID: PMC10823722 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Building healthcare service and health professionals' capacity and capability to rapidly translate research evidence into health practice is critical to the effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare systems. This review scoped the literature describing programmes to build knowledge translation capacity and capability in health professionals and healthcare services, and the evidence supporting these. METHODS This scoping review was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Four research databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo) were searched using a pre-determined strategy. Eligible studies described a programme implemented in healthcare settings to build health professional or healthcare service knowledge translation capacity and capability. Abstracts and full texts considered for inclusion were screened by two researchers. Data from included papers were extracted using a bespoke tool informed by the scoping review questions. RESULTS Database searches yielded 10,509 unique citations, of which 136 full texts were reviewed. Thirty-four papers were included, with three additional papers identified on citation searching, resulting in 37 papers describing 34 knowledge translation capability building programmes. Programmes were often multifaceted, comprising a combination of two or more strategies including education, dedicated implementation support roles, strategic research-practice partnerships and collaborations, co-designed knowledge translation capability building programmes, and dedicated funding for knowledge translation. Many programmes utilised experiential and collaborative learning, and targeted either individual, team, organisational, or system levels of impact. Twenty-seven programmes were evaluated formally using one or more data collection methods. Outcomes measured varied significantly and included participant self-reported outcomes, perceived barriers and enablers of knowledge translation, milestone achievement and behaviour change. All papers reported that programme objectives were achieved to varying degrees. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge translation capacity and capability building programmes in healthcare settings are multifaceted, often include education to facilitate experiential and collaborative learning, and target individual, team, organisational, or supra-organisational levels of impact. Although measured differently across the programmes, the outcomes were positive. The sustainability of programmes and outcomes may be undermined by the lack of long-term funding and inconsistent evaluation. Future research is required to develop evidence-informed frameworks to guide methods and outcome measures for short-, medium- and longer-term programme evaluation at the different structural levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia King
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
- Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
- Monash University, Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| | - Emma West
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Laura Alston
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Research Unit, Colac Area Health, Colac, VIC, Australia
| | - Hannah Beks
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Michele Callisaya
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Catherine E Huggins
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret Murray
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Kevin Mc Namara
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Anna Peeters
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Mia Pithie
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Alesha M Sayner
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Wong Shee
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sarkies MN, Testa L, Best S, Moullin JC, Sullivan D, Bishop W, Kostner K, Clifton P, Hare D, Brett T, Hutchinson K, Black A, Braithwaite J, Nicholls SJ, Kangaharan N, Pang J, Abhayaratna W, Horton A, Watts GF. Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Guidelines for Detecting Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Australia. Heart Lung Circ 2023; 32:1347-1353. [PMID: 37865587 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a genetic condition that is a preventable cause of premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. High-level evidence and clinical practice guidelines support preventative care for people with FH. However, it is estimated that less than 10% of people at risk of FH have been detected using any approach across Australian health settings. The aim of this study was to identify the implementation barriers to and facilitators of the detection of FH in Australia. METHODS Four, 2-hour virtual focus groups were facilitated by implementation scientists and a clinicians as part of the 2021 Australasian FH Summit. Template analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS There were 28 workshop attendees across four groups (n=6-8 each), yielding 13 barriers and 10 facilitators across three themes: (1) patient related, (2) provider related, and (3) system related. A "lack of care pathways" and "upskilling clinicians in identifying and diagnosing FH" were the most interconnected barriers and facilitators for the detection of FH. CONCLUSIONS The relationships between barriers and facilitators across the patient, provider, and system themes indicates that a comprehensive implementation strategy is needed to address these different levels. Future research is underway to develop a model for implementing the Australian FH guidelines into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell N Sarkies
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Luke Testa
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Joanna C Moullin
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - David Sullivan
- Department of Chemical Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Warrick Bishop
- Department of Cardiology, Calvary Cardiac Centre, Calvary Health Care, Hobart, Tas, Australia
| | - Karam Kostner
- Department of Cardiology, Mater Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Peter Clifton
- Department of Endocrinology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - David Hare
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Tom Brett
- General Practice and Primary Health Care Research, School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | - Karen Hutchinson
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Black
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tas, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen J Nicholls
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | | | - Jing Pang
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Walter Abhayaratna
- College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Ari Horton
- Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Monash Heart and Monash Children's Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Monash Genetics, Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Department of Genomic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Vic, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University Clayton, Vic, Australia
| | - Gerald F Watts
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sarkies M, Jones LK, Pang J, Sullivan D, Watts GF. How Can Implementation Science Improve the Care of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia? Curr Atheroscler Rep 2023; 25:133-143. [PMID: 36806760 PMCID: PMC10027803 DOI: 10.1007/s11883-023-01090-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Describe the application of implementation science to improve the detection and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia. RECENT FINDINGS Gaps between evidence and practice, such as underutilization of genetic testing, family cascade testing, failure to achieve LDL-cholesterol goals and low levels of knowledge and awareness, have been identified through clinical registry analyses and clinician surveys. Implementation science theories, models and frameworks have been applied to assess barriers and enablers in the literature specific to local contextual factors (e.g. stages of life). The effect of implementation strategies to overcome these factors has been evaluated; for example, automated identification of individuals with FH or training and education to improve statin adherence. Clinical registries were identified as a key infrastructure to monitor, evaluate and sustain improvements in care. The expansion in evidence supporting the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia requires a similar expansion of efforts to translate new knowledge into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Sarkies
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Laney K Jones
- Department of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Jing Pang
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - David Sullivan
- Department of Chemical Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gerald F Watts
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Lipid Disorders Clinic, Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cross AJ, Haines TP, Ooi CE, La Caze A, Karavesovska S, Lee EJ, Siu S, Sareen S, Jones C, Steeper M, Bell JS. Roles and effectiveness of knowledge brokers for translating clinical practice guidelines in health-related settings: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2023; 32:286-295. [PMID: 36746617 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor translation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) into clinical practice is a barrier to the provision of consistent and high-quality evidence-based care. The objective was to systematically review the roles and effectiveness of knowledge brokers (KBs) for translating CPGs in health-related settings. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL Plus were searched from 2014 to June 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled and uncontrolled preintervention and postintervention studies involving KBs, either alone or as part of a multicomponent intervention, that reported quantitative postintervention changes in guideline implementation in a healthcare setting were included. A KB was defined as an intermediary who facilitated knowledge translation by acting in at least two of the following core roles: knowledge manager, linkage agent or capacity builder. Specific activities undertaken by KBs were deductively coded to the three core roles, then common activities were inductively grouped. Screening, data extraction, quality assessment and coding were performed independently by two authors. RESULTS 16 studies comprising 6 RCTs, 8 uncontrolled precomparisons-postcomparisons, 1 controlled precomparison-postcomparison and 1 interrupted time series were included. 14 studies (88%) were conducted in hospital settings. Knowledge manager roles included creating and distributing guideline material. Linkage agent roles involved engaging with internal and external stakeholders. Capacity builder roles involved audit and feedback and educating staff. KBs improved guideline adherence in 10 studies (63%), had mixed impact in 2 studies (13%) and no impact in 4 studies (25%). Half of the RCTs showed KBs had no impact on guideline adherence. KBs acted as knowledge managers in 15 (94%) studies, linkage agents in 11 (69%) studies and capacity builders in all studies. CONCLUSION Knowledge manager and capacity builder roles were more frequently studied than linkage agent roles. KBs had mixed impact on translating CPGs into practice. Further RCTs, including those in non-hospital settings, are required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022340365.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Cross
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Terry P Haines
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Choon Ean Ooi
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adam La Caze
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sara Karavesovska
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eu Jin Lee
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel Siu
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sagar Sareen
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carlos Jones
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Steeper
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Simon Bell
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clark EC, Dhaliwal B, Ciliska D, Neil-Sztramko SE, Steinberg M, Dobbins M. A pragmatic evaluation of a public health knowledge broker mentoring education program: a convergent mixed methods study. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:18. [PMID: 35168662 PMCID: PMC8845284 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00267-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public health professionals are expected to use the best available research and contextual evidence to inform decision-making. The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools developed, implemented, and evaluated a Knowledge Broker mentoring program aimed at facilitating organization-wide evidence-informed decision-making in ten public health units in Ontario, Canada. The purpose of this study was to pragmatically assess the impact of the program. METHODS A convergent mixed methods design was used to interpret quantitative results in the context of the qualitative findings. A goal-setting exercise was conducted with senior leadership in each organization prior to implementing the program. Achievement of goals was quantified through deductive coding of post-program interviews with participants and management. Interviews analyzed inductively to qualitatively explain progress toward identified goals and identify key factors related to implementation of EIDM within the organization. RESULTS Organizations met their goals for evidence use to varying degrees. The key themes identified that support an organizational shift to EIDM include definitive plans for participants to share knowledge during and after program completion, embedding evidence into decision-making processes, and supportive leadership with organizational investment of time and resources. The location, setting, or size of health units was not associated with attainment of EIDM goals; small, rural health units were not at a disadvantage compared to larger, urban health units. CONCLUSIONS The Knowledge Broker mentoring program allowed participants to share their learning and support change at their health units. When paired with organizational supports such as supportive leadership and resource investment, this program holds promise as an innovative knowledge translation strategy for organization wide EIDM among public health organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Clark
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Bandna Dhaliwal
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Donna Ciliska
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre, 2 J20, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4 K1, Canada
| | - Sarah E Neil-Sztramko
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, McMaster University Medical Centre, 2C Area, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4 K1, Canada
| | | | - Maureen Dobbins
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada.
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre, 2 J20, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4 K1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Elvin Hsing Geng and colleagues discuss mechanism mapping and its utility in conceptualizing and understanding how implementation strategies produce desired effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvin H. Geng
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Institute for Public Health and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Ana A. Baumann
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Byron J. Powell
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation, Institute for Public Health and Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McKercher JP, Slade SC, Jazayeri J, Hodge A, Knight M, Green J, Woods J, Morris ME. Patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions: protocol for a rapid review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056927. [PMID: 35105653 PMCID: PMC8808383 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-centred care can be facilitated by co-design, which refers to collaboration between healthcare professionals and consumers in producing and implementing healthcare. Systematic reviews on co-design have mainly focused on the effectiveness of co-produced healthcare interventions. Less attention has been directed towards the experiences of patients in co-designed interventions. This rapid review aims to explore patient experiences of co-designed rehabilitation interventions and inform rehabilitation decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A rapid review will expedite timely information on co-design experiences for stakeholders. Four electronic databases, including Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL, will be searched for papers published from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2022. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool will be used for randomised trials. Critical appraisal checklists from The Joanna Briggs Institute shall evaluate the risk of bias of non-randomised trials and qualitative studies. A narrative synthesis will be provided for the quantitative studies. Thematic synthesis will be conducted on qualitative findings. The overall strength of the evidence will be measured using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for quantitative investigations and the GRADE-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research for qualitative studies. The results will be presented using narrative summaries, identified themes, summary tables, flow charts and quantitative statistical analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required for the review. The protocol and rapid review will be submitted to an online, open access and peer-reviewed journal for publication. The review findings will be rapidly translated to consumers, clinicians, healthcare leaders, organisations, researchers and policy makers via publications, evidence summaries, conferences, workshops, websites, social media and online events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021264547.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P McKercher
- Physiotherapy, The Victorian Rehabilitation Centre, Glen Waverley, Victoria, Australia
- Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan C Slade
- Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jalal Jazayeri
- Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anita Hodge
- Healthscope Limited, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Knight
- Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Victorian Rehabilitation Centre, Glen Waverley, Victoria, Australia
| | - Janet Green
- Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Healthscope Limited, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Woods
- Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Healthscope Limited, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Meg E Morris
- Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Healthscope Limited, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|