Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes

Elucidating the hemodynamic impact of residual stenosis post-carotid artery stenting: A numerical study

BACKGROUND

Residual stenosis (RS) and hemodynamics demonstrate a significant correlation with postoperative in-stent restenosis/thrombosis following carotid artery stenting (CAS).

PURPOSE

This study endeavors to elucidate the potential associations between RS and adverse postoperative hemodynamic factors.

METHODS

This study utilized 46 patient-specific carotid artery models post-stenting, which were categorized into two groups based on the presence of RS: the normal group (N, n = 23) and the RS group (RS, n = 23). A comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the discrepancies in geometry and adverse hemodynamic parameters, alongside investigating the potential correlation between hemodynamic and geometric parameters.

RESULTS

The results reveal that a higher reflux flow volume is discernible in the RS group during low-velocity phases of the cardiac cycle, concomitant with an augmented extent of areas exposed to oscillatory shear stress and extended particle residence time. Moreover, the adverse hemodynamic parameters exhibit a positive correlation with the degree of stent expansion, stent length in the common carotid artery (CCA), and the distal slope of the RS.

CONCLUSION

The distal slope and tortuosity of RS significantly influence the development of adverse hemodynamic conditions post-stenting, exacerbating the hemodynamic environment near the stenosis. Interestingly, while an extended stent length in the internal carotid artery (ICA) region improves hemodynamics by reducing flow disturbance, a longer stent in the CCA significantly worsens these conditions. Hence, it is prudent to analyze the characteristics of the local lesion regions to optimize the strategy for stent implantation.

Quantitative assessment of retinochoroidal microvasculature in patients with carotid artery stenosis using OCT angiography

PURPOSE

To investigate the alterations in retinochoroidal parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) in patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and assess their associations with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) data.

METHOD

This study enrolled patients diagnosed with CAS and age-matched healthy controls. Both groups underwent OCT and OCTA examinations. DSA and assessment of carotid artery stenosis were performed only in the CAS group. The study evaluated various retinochoroidal parameters from OCT and OCTA, including linear vessel density (LVD), foveal avascular zone (FAZ), choroidal thickness (ChT), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. DSA-derived measures included cervical segment (C1) diameter, cavernous segment (C4) diameter, stenosis percentage, ophthalmic artery (OA) filling time, C1-OA filling time, and residual stenosis.

RESULTS

A total of 42 eyes from 30 CAS patients and 60 eyes from 30 healthy controls were included. Patients with CAS displayed significantly decreased LVD compared to controls (p < 0.001). Additionally, the CAS group had thinner choroid and RNFL (p = 0.047 and p < 0.001, respectively). Macular LVD negatively correlated with both stenosis percentage and C1-OA filling time (p = 0.010 and p = 0.014, respectively). In patients who underwent carotid artery stenting, preoperative ChT significantly correlated with residual stenosis (Pearson r = -0.480, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

OCT and OCTA provide a quantitative assessment of retinochoroidal microstructural changes associated with CAS, suggesting potential for noninvasive evaluation of the disease. This might contribute to the prevention of irreversible ocular complications and early detection of CAS. Furthermore, ChT may not only aid in diagnosing CAS more reliably but also offer prognostic information.

Impact of post-procedure stenosis on outcomes of patients with severe intracranial stenosis treated with intracranial stent placement

BACKGROUND

The optimal target post-procedure stenosis after percutaneous angioplasty and stent placement (PTAS) for intracranial stenosis is unknown. We determined the effect of post-procedure stenosis after intracranial PTAS on subsequent clinical events in patients with severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis.

METHODS

We categorized the severity of post-procedure stenosis as '<30%', '30-49%', and '≥50%' among 207 patients who underwent PTAS in a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Outcomes included stroke or death within 72 hours and within 30 days, ipsilateral stroke beyond 30 days of treatment, and stroke or death within 30 days or stroke in the qualifying artery beyond 30 days (primary endpoint of the trial). Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed with adjustments for age, initial severity of stenosis, location of stenosis, and qualifying event. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for the primary endpoint stratified by post-procedure stenosis with log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

The severity of post-procedure stenosis was categorized as <30%, 30-49%, and ≥50% in 112, 73, and 22 patients, respectively. Compared with patients with post-procedure stenosis <30%, there was no difference in the risk of primary endpoint among patients with post-procedure stenoses of 30-49% (hazards ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.64 to 1.15) or those with ≥50% (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.43). Log-rank analysis did not demonstrate a difference in rates of primary endpoint between groups stratified by post-procedure stenosis (P=0.70).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of any benefit on short- and long-term outcomes, strategies to achieve a low severity of post-procedure stenosis among patients with severe intracranial stenosis may not be warranted.

The role of post-dilatation in carotid MicroNet-covered stent implantation, evaluated using 3D cone-beam CT angiography

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the role and safety of post-dilatation in protected carotid artery stenting (PCAS) using the new MicroNet-covered 2nd-generation stent assessed by cone beam CT scans.

METHODS

From March 2020 to March 2022, patients were enrolled in the study according to CT angiography results based on the following criteria: Evidence of 70% to 99% carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients and 50% to 99% in symptomatic patients, per the NASCET index. Using a FilterWire EZ™ (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) embolic protection system (EPS), MicroNet-covered stent PCAS was performed by two interventional radiologists with at least 8 years of experience in endovascular intervention. Each patient underwent post-dilatation following stent placement. Finally, a third radiologist (not participating in the interventional procedures) evaluated the cone beam CT scans and calculated residual stenosis. Major and minor complications were recorded in the 30 days following the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients (121 male, mean age 73±10 years) were included in the study, and all patients received post-dilatation following stent implantation. Technical successes were achieved in all procedures. Adverse events noted in this study were limited to periprocedural transient ischemic attacks that occurred in three out of 192 patients (1.6%) and showed a swift complete recovery. The post-dilatation balloon diameters used in the study were: 5.0 mm (30.3%), 5.5 mm (39.3%) and 6 mm (30.3%). Optimized postdilatation resulted in a significant increase in the final luminal area. Similar improvements were observed in all subtypes of plaque.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-dilatation in protected CAS is safe and induces a significant improvement in the cross-sectional area regardless of the stenotic plaque.

Usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography to predict residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting

OBJECTIVES

The long-term durability of carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be determined by various factors; however, residual stenosis is a known risk factor for in-stent restenosis. The authors of this article utilized cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in angiosuite to investigate plaque features affecting the character and quality of stent expansion after CAS.

METHODS

Forty-two CAS cases with both pre- and post-CAS CBCT evaluations were included in this retrospective analysis. Five features derived from pre-CAS images were tested: (1) eccentricity, (2) overballoon, (3) maximum plaque thickness, (4) calcification barrier, and (5) stenotic degree. For post-CAS CBCT, stent configuration was assessed if the stent was expanded and oval or round in shape as well as outward or inward in orientation. Variables were tested if they were associated with oval expansion, outward expansion, and 20% residual stenosis after CAS.

RESULTS

Oval or outward expansion is directly related to residual stenosis. The oval expansion was associated with maximum plaque thickness, and outward expansion was associated with the presence of a calcification barrier. Variables related to > 20% residual stenosis were the maximum plaque thickness, calcification barrier, and pre-CAS stenotic degree.

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT for carotid stenosis may provide valuable information about plaque features, especially calcification features that may interfere with the angioplasty effect, as well as the characteristics and quality of stent expansion. Residual stenosis > 20% was associated with calcification barrier, maximum plaque thickness, and pre-CAS stenotic degree.

Balloon Dilation Strategy Does Not Affect Outcomes for Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) in Prospective Trials

OBJECTIVES

Strategies of balloon dilation during trans-femoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) include pre-stent dilation only (PRE), post-stent dilation only (POST), or both pre- and post- dilation (PRE+POST). Concerns over higher neurological risk have been raised with POST and PRE+POST during TFCAS. Whether these concerns are applicable to Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) which utilizes proximal clamping and cerebral blood flow reversal during stent deployment and balloon angioplasty remains unknown. Our aim is to analyze outcomes of PRE, POST or PRE+POST balloon dilation strategies during TCAR.

METHODS

We analyzed the prospectively collected data from the ROADSTER1 (pivotal), ROADSTER2 (FDA indicated post-market), and Roadster Extended Access TCAR trials. All trial patients had high risk anatomic or clinical factors for carotid endarterectomy and were included unless they did not undergo stent deployment nor balloon dilation. For trial inclusion, asymptomatic patients had >80% carotid stenosis, and symptomatic patients had >50% stenosis. Primary outcome measures were stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days. Data were statistically analyzed with chi-square, ANOVA, and multivariable analysis as appropriate.

RESULTS

There were 851 patients (566 male) who underwent dilation by PRE (N=216), POST (N=249), or PRE+POST (N=386). Patients had carotid stenosis >70% (N=828, 97%), and 207 (24%) were symptomatic. Flow reversal times were longer in the PRE+POST group (PRE 10.2mins, POST 9.8mins, PRE+ POST 13.3mins, P<.001). The 30-day stroke rate for the whole cohort was 1.9%, mortality was 0.5%, and MI rate was 0.94%. Stroke rates for the PRE cohort (1.9%), POST cohort (2.0%), and PRE+POST cohort (1.8%, P=.98) were similar. Also, death rates at 30 days, and composite stroke/death/myocardial infarction rates were similar in the three cohorts. No significant differences in adverse outcomes were noted among the various dilation strategies for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

CONCLUSION

Based on these prospective trial data, there is no difference in neurological complications due to balloon dilation strategy during TCAR. Balloon dilation technique best suited to the patient's specific lesion morphology should be utilized. Further studies are needed to evaluate the relationship of these dilation strategies to long term outcomes including stent patency, restenosis and reintervention.

Poststent ballooning during transcarotid artery revascularization

BACKGROUND

Poststent ballooning/angioplasty (post-SB) have been shown to increase the risk of stroke risk after transfemoral carotid artery stenting. With the advancement of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) with dynamic cerebral blood flow reversal, we aimed to study the impact of post-SB during TCAR.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TCAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative between September 2016 and May 2019 were included and were divided into three groups: those who received prestent deployment angioplasty only (pre-SB, reference group), those who received poststent deployment ballooning only (post-SB), and those who received both prestent and poststent deployment ballooning (prepost-SB). Patients who did not receive any angioplasty during their procedure (n = 367 [6.7%]) were excluded because these represent a different group of patients with less complex lesions than those requiring angioplasty. Primary outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Analysis was performed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 5161 patients undergoing TCAR, 34.7% had pre-SB only, 25% had post-SB only, and 40.3% had both (prepost-SB). No differences in the rates of in-hospital and 30-day stroke, death, and stroke/death were observed among the three groups; in-hospital stroke/death in the pre-SB group was 1.4% (n = 25), post-SB 1.2% (n = 16), and prepost-SB 1.4% (n = 29; P = .92). However, patients undergoing post-SB and prepost-SB had higher rates of in-hospital transient ischemic attacks (TIA) (post-SB, 0.9%; prepost-SB, 1% vs pre-SB, 0.2%, P < .01) and postprocedural hypotension (16.6% and 16.8% vs 13.1%, respectively; P < .001). Post-SB also had longer operative times, as well as flow reversal and fluoroscopy times. On multivariable analysis, no association was seen between post-SB and the primary outcome of in-hospital stroke/death (post-SB odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.73; prepost-SB OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.57-1.70). Similarly, no significant differences were noted in terms of postprocedural hemodynamic instability and 30-day outcomes. However, post-SB and prepost-SB were associated with four times the odds of in-hospital TIA compared with pre-SB alone (post-SB OR, 4.24 [95% CI, 1.51-11.8]; prepost-SB OR, 4.76 [95% CI, 1.53-14.79]; P = .01). Symptomatic patients had higher rates of in-hospital stroke/death compared with their asymptomatic counterparts; however, there was no significant interaction between symptomatic status and ballooning in predicting the primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-SB was used in 65.3% of TCAR patients. This maneuver seems to be safe without an increase in the odds of postoperative in-hospital stroke/death. However, the increased rates of TIA associated with post-SB requires further investigation.