The Efficacy of Bone Wax in Reduction of Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

The effect of metaphyseal holes and interposition material on the longitudinal growth stimulation of long bones in a rabbit model

Aims

It remains unclear which factors influence overgrowth of the tibia, resulting from the metaphyseal hole created during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. This study aimed to investigate the effects of growth stimulation by creating a metaphyseal hole in a rabbit model, based on its distance from the physis and type of interposition material.

Methods

In Experiment 1, 38 skeletally immature male New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into one of four groups: a metaphyseal hole created at 5, 10, or 15 mm distal to the physis of the left proximal tibia with the hole filled with bone wax, or a sham control group. In Experiment 2, after establishing the distance associated with the most overgrowth, a defect was created at 10 mm distal to the physis in 20 additional rabbits, which were randomly assigned to have the defect filled with Tisseel, or be left unfilled. The rabbits were euthanized six weeks postoperatively.

Results

The length and rate of overgrowth were higher in the groups with holes drilled 5 and 10 mm distal to the physis compared to the sham group. A significant increase in new bone width was observed in the 10 mm distal hole group. Growth stimulation in both radiological and histological analyses was not significant in the unfilled and Tisseel groups. Valgus deformities were observed in all groups with metaphyseal holes compared to the sham group.

Conclusion

Creating a metaphyseal hole 10 mm distal to the physis of the proximal tibia can significantly stimulate longitudinal growth and induce tibia valga in rabbits; however, the effect varies depending on the type of interposition material. Notably, overgrowth was significant only in the group with holes filled with bone wax. Based on this study, the location of the metaphyseal hole during ACL reconstruction or physeal bar excision could be optimized.

Effect of Oral + Topical and Only Topical Tranaxamic Acid Application on Blood Loss and Postoperative Transfusion in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most common procedures performed to reduce pain and improve hip functions in patients with advanced hip osteoarthritis, but perioperative blood loss, acute anemia and transfusion requirement increase the risk of morbidity and mortality during and after surgery and negatively affect functional recovery. We aimed to present the comparative results of oral + topical and only topical tranexamic acid application to reduce blood loss and postoperative transfusion in primary total hip arthroplasty. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the patients who applied to the Orthopedics and Traumatology outpatient clinic with complaints of hip pain and limited movement between January 2014 and December 2020, who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with the diagnosis of coxarthrosis and who were administered oral + topical and only topical tranexamic acid before and during surgery, in terms of blood loss and transfusion requirement. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the preoperative, day 0 and day 1 hemoglobin means in those that were applied oral + topical tranexamic acid and those that were applied only topical (p > 0.05). However, the second- and third-day hemoglobin means in those that were treated with topical medication alone were found to be statistically significantly lower than in those that were treated with oral + topical tranexamic acid (p = 0.032, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Oral + topical tranexamic acid application in total hip arthroplasty surgery is more effective than topical applications alone when it comes to reducing blood loss, hemoglobin and hematocrit decrease without increasing the risk of thromboembolic diseases and wound complications.

Postoperative Harris Hip Score Versus Harris Hip Score Difference in Hip Replacement: What to Report?

BACKGROUND

Reliable scientific information is crucial for assessing hip function and evaluating the success of hip surgery. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is the most widely used tool for measuring hip function and, in particular, the outcomes of hip surgery. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the HHS for hip replacement treatment groups and to test whether there was a substantial difference between reporting only the postoperative HHS or the HHS difference (HHSdiff).

METHODS

PubMed, CNKI, and Epistemonikos were searched until March 1, 2024. The risk of bias, level of evidence, and publication bias were assessed. As HHS is a continuous outcome, mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method and a common-effect/random-effects model. The same approach was used for both postoperative HHS and HHSdiff. The effect of the two treatment groups studied (minimally invasive vs. conventional approach) on postoperative HHS was then compared with the effect of the two groups studied on the difference in HHS.

RESULTS

A total of 41 RCTs, involving 3572 patients, with a low to high risk of bias and a low to moderate publication bias were included. The measured outcome parameters showed a low to moderate level of evidence. There was no relevant difference in the reporting of HHS only postoperatively or HHSdiff when comparing two hip replacement treatment groups in RCTs, measured at 0-0.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that there is no relevant difference between reporting of the HHS only postoperatively or HHSdiff when comparing two hip replacement treatment groups in RCTs. Both methods of HHS reporting produced comparable results in an identical cohort of 3765 patients undergoing hip replacement surgery.

Efficacy and Safety of Bone Wax Application at Different Time Points to Reduce Postoperative Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

In addition to the surface hemorrhage of cancellous bone after large-area osteotomy, the intramedullary hemorrhage after the reamed knee joint is also a major cause of postoperative bleeding after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bone wax application at different time points of prone hemorrhage to reduce perioperative blood loss.

METHODS

From August 2023 to December 2023, 150 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA were included in this prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A, after autogenous osteotomy plug was used to fill the femoral medullary cavity, the residual space was sealed with bone wax and the exposed cancellous bone surface around the prosthesis was coated with bone wax after the prosthesis adhesion; group B, only the exposed cancellous bone surface around the prosthesis was coated with bone wax; and group C, no bone wax was used. The primary outcome was total perioperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes included occult blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin reduction, blood transfusion rate, lower limb diameter, and knee function, while length of hospital stay was recorded. Tertiary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative related adverse events.

RESULTS

The total blood loss in group A (551.5 ± 224.5 mL) and group B (656.3 ± 267.7 mL) was significantly lower than that in group C (755.3 ± 248.3 ml, p < 0.001), and the total blood loss in group A was also lower than that in group B (p < 0.05). There were also significant differences in the reduction of hemoglobin level and hidden blood loss among the three groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant improvement in postoperative lower limb swelling, knee joint activity and hospitalization time; there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications such as thromboembolism.

CONCLUSION

The use of bone wax in TKA can safely and effectively reduce perioperative blood loss and hemoglobin drop rate, and multiple use at time points during the operation when blood loss is prone to occur can produce more significant hemostatic effect.

Indirect comparisons of traction table versus standard table in total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether the use of an orthopaedic traction table (TT) in direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) results in better outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to compare the THA outcomes through DAA on a standard operating table and the THA outcomes through DAA on a TT.

METHODS

PubMed, Epistemonikos, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 01 January 2024. An indirect comparison in network meta-analysis was performed to assess treatment effects between DAA on a TT and DAA on a standard table, using fixed-effects and random-effects models estimated with frequentist approach and consistency assumption. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for continuous variables and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated for binary variables.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature identified 43 RCTs with a total of 2,258 patients. DAA with TT had a 102.3 mL higher intraoperative blood loss and a 0.6 mmol/L lower Hb 3 days postoperatively compared with DAA without TT (SMD = 102.33, 95% CI 47.62 to 157.04; SMD = - 0.60, 95% CI  - 1.19 to - 0.00). DAA with TT had a 0.15 lower periprosthetic fracture OR compared with DAA without TT (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.86). There were no further significant differences in surgical, radiological, functional outcomes and in complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings and taking into account the limitations, we recommend that particular attention be paid to the risk of periprosthetic fracture in DAA on a standard operating table and blood loss in DAA with TT. Since numerous other surgical, radiological, functional outcome parameters and other complication rates studied showed no significant difference between DAA on a standard operating table and DAA with TT, no recommendation for a change in surgical technique seems justified.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I evidence, because this is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The Use of Bone Wax in Hemostatic Control for Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasties: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Blood loss can be a serious complication in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Various methods are used by surgeons to achieve hemostatic control in these patients. Complications are associated with perioperative blood loss. In this systematic review, we examined the efficacy of using bone wax to control bleeding in patients undergoing THA and TKA. Methods: The PRISMA model was used to systematically identify and aggregate articles for this study. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were used to search individual studies that examined the use of bone wax in THA or TKA. After applying the search term "bone wax", 2478 articles were initially identified. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, three articles were aggregated for this systematic review. Results: The use of bone wax in THA and TKA decreased blood loss in patients undergoing these operations. Postoperative blood loss following surgery was lower in the bone wax groups compared to the control groups as well. Patients in the bone wax groups also required fewer blood transfusions than those who did not receive bone wax. Conclusions: Bone wax appears to be another modality that can be used by physicians to maintain hemostatic control in THA or TKA patients. Reduced blood loss and transfusion rates in surgery can increase patient outcomes. More studies are needed to examine the efficacy of bone wax in comparison with other hemostatic tools.

A neck-sparing short stem shows significantly lower blood loss in total hip arthroplasty compared to a neck-resecting short stem

Short stems are associated with a significantly lower blood loss (BL) compared to straight stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different types of stems differ in design, fixation and level of femoral neck osteotomy. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the difference regarding the perioperative BL between two short stems with different designs in direct anterior approach (DAA). A total of 187 THA performed by a single surgeon were analysed. 107 patients received a neck-resecting (Group A) and 80 patients a neck-sparing short stem (Group B). Blood counts of the day before surgery and of two days after surgery were evaluated. Total blood volume and BL were calculated. Additionally, duration of surgery was analysed. The perioperative BL was significantly lower in Group B (451.4 ± 188.4 ml) compared to Group A (546.6 ± 232.7 ml; p = 0.002). The postoperative haematocrit (31.6 ± 3.7% vs. 30.4 ± 4.4%; p = 0.049) and haemoglobin-level (11.0 ± 1.3 g/dL vs. 10.4 ± 1.5 g/dL; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in Group B. Duration of surgery was significantly shorter in Group B (62.0 ± 11.4 min vs. 72.6 ± 21.8 min; p < 0.001). The use of a neck-sparing short stem leads to a significantly decreased BL compared to a neck-resecting short stem in DAA THA. A less extensively conducted capsular release necessary for optimal femoral exposition might lead to a lower perioperative BL and shorter durations of surgery.

Comparative study of carbazochrome sodium sulfonate and tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and inflammatory response following direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Carbazochrome sodium sulfonate (CSS) is a haemostatic agent. However, its hemostatic and anti-inflammatory effects in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a direct anterior approach (DAA) are unknown. We investigated the efficacy and safety of CSS combined with tranexamic acid (TXA) in THA using DAA.

METHODS

This study enrolled 100 patients who underwent primary, unilateral THA through a direct anterior approach. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A used a combination of TXA and CSS, while Group B used TXA only. The primary outcome was total perioperative blood loss. The secondary outcomes were hidden blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion rate, inflammatory reactant levels, hip function, pain score, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and incidence of associated adverse reactions.

RESULTS

The total blood loss (TBL) in group A was significantly lower than in group B. The levels of inflammatory reactants and the rate of blood transfusion were also significantly lower. However, the two groups had no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain score, or joint function. There were no significant differences in VTE or postoperative complications between the groups.

CONCLUSION

As a haemostatic agent, CSS combined with TXA can reduce postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing THA via DAA and seems to have an anti-inflammatory effect. Moreover, it did not increase the incidence of VTE or its related complications.