Could inducible protein-10 and heparin-binding hemagglutinin improve the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected subjects in a country with low incidence of tuberculosis?

Diagnostic performance of biomarkers for differentiating active tuberculosis from latent tuberculosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

PCR and culture tests are used together to confirm the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB). Due to the long culture period, if the PCR test is negative, it takes a significant amount of time for the culture result to be available. Interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs), which are widely used to diagnose TB or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), cannot effectively discriminate TB from LTBI. The purpose of this study is to analyze the diagnostic performance of various markers for differentiating between TB from LTBI.

Methods

PubMed-Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to the end of May 2024, without restrictions on publication date and population. Articles describing the diagnostic value of at least one biomarker for differentiating between TB and LTBI were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess study quality. Two independent researchers assessed the articles using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed for diagnostic tools of 11 groups used to differentiate TB from LTBI.

Results

Out of 164 identified articles, 159 reports were included in the systematic review and 58 in the meta-analysis. Seventy results from 58 reports accounting for 9,291 participants were included. When measuring interleukin-2 (IL-2) after stimulation with latency antigen, the most significant odds ratio was shown in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The values were 9.46, 18.5, 11.30, and 9.61, respectively.

Conclusion

This study shows that the IL-2 level after stimulation with latent antigen is a potential biomarker for differentiating TB from LTBI.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024542996.

Mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HBHA)-induced interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) for discrimination of latent and active tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HBHA) is an important latency-associated antigen that can be used to distinguish between latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (ATB). Although many studies were explored the efficiency of the HBHA-induced interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) in different populations, the clinical differential value of HBHA-IGRA is still controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether the HBHA-IGRA can be used as an efficient test for the discrimination of LTBI and ATB by a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on Oct 18, 2020, with no start date limitation. The quality of each study was evaluated using Review Manager 5.4. The Stata MP v.14.0 software was used to combine sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under SROC (AUC) to evaluate the diagnostic value of HBHA-IGRA for discrimination of LTBI and ATB. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed for the sources of heterogeneity based on the selection criteria for active TB, the population, the TB burden, the type of antigen, the type of sample, and the time of antigen stimulation.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies (14 results) were included in this meta-analysis, including 603 ATB patients and 514 LTBI individuals. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the HBHA-IGRA for discrimination of the LTBI and ATB were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.57~0.80) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71~0.84), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 3.15 (95%CI, 2.43~4.09), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.27~0.56), and 8.11 (95% CI, 4.81~13.67), respectively. The AUC was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77~0.84). The subgroup analysis showed that the main source of heterogeneity was due to the HIV-infected population incorporated, and the different selection criteria of active TB subjects would also lead to the variation of the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Different TB burdens, HBHA antigen types, sample types, antigen stimulation time and BCG vaccination did not affect the heterogeneity in this analysis.

CONCLUSION

The HBHA-IGRA is a promising immunodiagnostic test for discrimination of latent and active TB, which can be added in commercial IGRAs to enhance the differential diagnostic performance.