1
|
Al-Rubaiey S, Senger C, Bukatz J, Krantchev K, Janas A, Eitner C, Nieminen-Kelhä M, Brandenburg S, Zips D, Vajkoczy P, Acker G. Determinants of cerebral radionecrosis in animal models: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2024; 199:110444. [PMID: 39067705 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radionecrosis is a common complication in radiation oncology, while mechanisms and risk factors have yet to be fully explored. We therefore conducted a systematic review to understand the pathogenesis and identify factors that significantly affect the development. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search based on the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Ovid, and Web of Science databases. The complete search strategy can be found as a preregistered protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42023361662). RESULTS We included 83 studies, most involving healthy animals (n = 72, 86.75 %). High doses of hemispherical irradiation of 30 Gy in rats and 50 Gy in mice led repeatedly to radionecrosis among different studies and set-ups. Higher dose and larger irradiated volume were associated with earlier onset. Fractionated schedules showed limited effectiveness in the prevention of radionecrosis. Distinct anatomical brain structures respond to irradiation in various ways. White matter appears to be more vulnerable than gray matter. Younger age, more evolved animal species, and genetic background were also significant factors, whereas sex was irrelevant. Only 13.25 % of the studies were performed on primary brain tumor bearing animals, no studies on brain metastases are currently available. CONCLUSION This systematic review identified various factors that significantly affect the induction of radionecrosis. The current state of research neglects the utilization of animal models of brain tumors, even though patients with brain malignancies constitute the largest group receiving brain irradiation. This latter aspect should be primarily addressed when developing an experimental radionecrosis model for translational implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanaria Al-Rubaiey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jan Bukatz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Kiril Krantchev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Anastasia Janas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Chiara Eitner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Melina Nieminen-Kelhä
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Susan Brandenburg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Güliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1 10117, Berlin, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin DW, Yee GT. Surgical resection versus stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases in the motor cortex; a meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2024:10.1007/s10585-024-10311-4. [PMID: 39302558 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-024-10311-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
Brain metastasis in the motor cortex is a challenging condition to treat. Surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hypoSRT) are valuable options up to now. Due to its unique location and potential for neurologic deficits, neither treatment is entirely satisfactory. There is still a lack of data on the treatment result of motor cortex metastasis. This study provides a comprehensive review and meta-analysis comparing surgery and SRS/hypoSRT for treating brain metastasis in the motor cortex. Core databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, were systematically searched for brain metastasis in the motor cortex, demonstrating the clinical outcomes of both surgery and SRS/hypoSRT. Motor power outcome and treatment-associated complication rates were thoroughly evaluated. Twenty-five articles were listed for full-text review. Among them, 13 articles were eligible for inclusion criteria: retrospective cohort studies comparing surgery and SRS/hypoSRT. There are 323 patients in the surgery group and 220 in the SRS/hypoSRT group. The motor outcome is better in surgery group, but without statistical significance (0.49 vs 0.37, p = 0.3937) and treatment-related complication is lower in surgery group with statistical significance (0.09 vs 0.26, p = 0.0218). Treatment modality should be tailored by the patient's performance status, history of radiation, presence of ongoing chemotherapy, or extracranial progression status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Won Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, 783, Namdong-daero, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Gi-Taek Yee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, 783, Namdong-daero, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pichardo-Rojas PS, Vázquez-Alva D, Alvarez-Castro JA, Flores-Patiño B, Escalante-Ordoñez E, Haro-Adame JA, Espinosa-Temaxte CE, Amsbaugh M, Blanco AI, Trifiletti DM, Esquenazi Y. Comparative effectiveness of frame-based and mask-based Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery in brain metastases: A 509 patient meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2024:10.1007/s11060-024-04738-8. [PMID: 39153030 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04738-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is the primary treatment for patients with limited numbers of small brain metastases. Head fixation is usually performed with framed-based (FB) fixation; however, mask-based (MB) fixation has emerged as a less invasive alternative. A comparative meta-analysis between both approaches has not been performed. METHODS Databases were searched until August 28th, 2023, to identify studies comparing MB and FB SRS in the treatment of brain metastases. Our outcomes of interest included local tumor control (LTC), radiation necrosis (RN), mortality, and treatment time (TT). Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and hazard ratio (HR) were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS From 295 articles initially identified, six studies (1 clinical trial) involving 509 patients were included. LTC revealed comparable RR at 6-months (RR = 0.95[95%CI = 0.89-1.01], p = 0.12) and a marginal benefit in FB SRS at 1-year (RR = 0.87[95%CI = 0.78-0.96], p = 0.005). However, in oligometastases exclusively treated with single-fraction SRS, LTC was similar among groups (RR = 0.92 [95%CI = 0.89-1.0], p = 0.30). Similarly, in patients with oligometastases treated with single-fraction SRS, RN (HR = 1.69; 95%CI = 0.72-3.97, p = 0.22), TT (MD = -29.64; 95%CI = -80.38-21.10, p = 0.25), and mortality were similar among groups (RR = 0.62; 95%CI = 0.22-1.76, p = 0.37). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that FB and MB SRS, particularly oligometastases treated with single-fraction, are comparable in terms of LTC, RN, TT, and mortality. Further research is essential to draw definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel S Pichardo-Rojas
- The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Precision Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Diego Vázquez-Alva
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México
| | - José A Alvarez-Castro
- Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía "Manuel Velasco Suárez", Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Julio A Haro-Adame
- Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Baja California, México
| | | | - Mark Amsbaugh
- The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Precision Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Angel I Blanco
- The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Precision Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | | | - Yoshua Esquenazi
- The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Precision Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lehrer EJ, Breen WG, Singh R, Palmer JD, Brown PD, Trifiletti DM, Sheehan JP. Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2024; 95:253-258. [PMID: 38511946 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important weapon in the management of brain metastases. Single-fraction SRS is associated with local control rates ranging from approximately 70% to 100%, which are largely dependent on lesion and postoperative cavity size. The rates of local control and improved neurocognitive outcomes compared with conventional whole-brain radiation therapy have led to increased adoption of SRS in these settings. However, when treating larger targets and/or targets located in eloquent locations, the risk of normal tissue toxicity and adverse radiation effects within healthy brain tissue becomes significantly higher. Thus, hypofractionated SRS has become a widely adopted approach, which allows for the delivery of ablative doses of radiation while also minimizing the risk of toxicity. This approach has been studied in multiple retrospective reports in both the postoperative and intact settings. While there are no reported randomized data to date, there are trials underway evaluating this paradigm. In this article, we review the role of hypofractionated SRS in the management of brain metastases and emerging data that will serve to validate this treatment approach. Pertinent articles and references were obtained from a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester , Minnesota , USA
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester , Minnesota , USA
| | - Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus , Ohio , USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus , Ohio , USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester , Minnesota , USA
| | | | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville , Virginia , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanayama N, Ikawa T, Takano K, Arita H, Morimoto M, Hirata T, Ogawa K, Teshima T, Konishi K. Association of increasing gross tumor volume dose with tumor volume reduction and local control in fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for unresected brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:95. [PMID: 39061079 PMCID: PMC11282845 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02487-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) is an important treatment strategy for unresected brain metastases. We previously reported that a good volumetric response 6 months after fSRS can be the first step for local control. Few studies have reported the association between gross tumor volume (GTV) dose, volumetric response, and local control in patients treated with the same number of fractions. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the GTV dose and volumetric response 6 months after fSRS in five daily fractions and identify the predictive GTV dose for local failure (LF) for unresected brain metastasis. METHODS This retrospective study included 115 patients with 241 unresected brain metastases treated using fSRS in five daily fractions at our hospital between January 2013 and April 2022. The median prescription dose was 35 Gy (range, 30-35 Gy) in five fractions. The median follow-up time after fSRS was 16 months (range, 7-66 months). RESULTS GTV D80 > 42 Gy and GTV D98 > 39 Gy were prognostic factors for over 65% volume reduction (odds ratio, 3.68, p < 0.01; odds ratio, 4.68, p < 0.01, respectively). GTV D80 > 42 Gy was also a prognostic factor for LF (hazard ratio, 0.37; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS GTV D80 > 42 Gy in five fractions led to better volume reduction and local control. The goal of planning an inhomogeneous dose distribution for fSRS in brain metastases may be to increase the GTV D80 and GTV D98. Further studies on inhomogeneous dose distributions are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo- ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo- ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Takano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Arita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Morimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo- ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takero Hirata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita-shi, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan
| | - Teruki Teshima
- Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, 3-1-10 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Center Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo- ku, Osaka-shi, 541-8567, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roh YH, Park JE, Park SY, Cho YH, Kim YH, Song SW, Yoon S, Kim HS. Assessment of imaging risks for recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases (IRRaS-BM). BMC Cancer 2024; 24:866. [PMID: 39026289 PMCID: PMC11264672 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12636-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The identification of viable tumors and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is crucial for patient management. Tumor habitat analysis involving the grouping of similar voxels can identify subregions that share common biology and enable the depiction of areas of tumor recurrence and treatment-induced change. This study aims to validate an imaging biomarker for tumor recurrence after SRS for brain metastasis by conducting tumor habitat analysis using multi-parametric MRI. METHODS In this prospective study (NCT05868928), patients with brain metastases will undergo multi-parametric MRI before SRS, and then follow-up MRIs will be conducted every 3 months until 24 months after SRS. The multi-parametric MRI protocol will include T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Using k-means voxel-wise clustering, this study will define three structural MRI habitats (enhancing, solid low-enhancing, and nonviable) on T1- and T2-weighted images and three physiologic MRI habitats (hypervascular cellular, hypovascular cellular, and nonviable) on apparent diffusion coefficient maps and cerebral blood volume maps. Using RANO-BM criteria as the reference standard, via Cox proportional hazards analysis, the study will prospectively evaluate associations between parameters of the tumor habitats and the time to recurrence. The DICE similarity coefficients between the recurrence site and tumor habitats will be calculated. DISCUSSION The tumor habitat analysis will provide an objective and reliable measure for assessing tumor recurrence from brain metastasis following SRS. By identifying subregions for local recurrence, our study could guide the next therapeutic targets for patients after SRS. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05868928).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Hwa Roh
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Eun Park
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Seo Young Park
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Korea National Open University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Hyun Cho
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Woo Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Shinkyo Yoon
- Department of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Sung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pandey S, Kutuk T, Abdalah MA, Stringfield O, Ravi H, Mills MN, Graham JA, Latifi K, Moreno WA, Ahmed KA, Raghunand N. Prediction of radiologic outcome-optimized dose plans and post-treatment magnetic resonance images: A proof-of-concept study in breast cancer brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100602. [PMID: 39040435 PMCID: PMC11261135 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Information in multiparametric Magnetic Resonance (mpMR) images is relatable to voxel-level tumor response to Radiation Treatment (RT). We have investigated a deep learning framework to predict (i) post-treatment mpMR images from pre-treatment mpMR images and the dose map ("forward models"), and, (ii) the RT dose map that will produce prescribed changes within the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) on post-treatment mpMR images ("inverse model"), in Breast Cancer Metastases to the Brain (BCMB) treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Materials and methods Local outcomes, planning computed tomography (CT) images, dose maps, and pre-treatment and post-treatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of water (ADC) maps, T1-weighted unenhanced (T1w) and contrast-enhanced (T1wCE), T2-weighted (T2w) and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) mpMR images were curated from 39 BCMB patients. mpMR images were co-registered to the planning CT and intensity-calibrated. A 2D pix2pix architecture was used to train 5 forward models (ADC, T2w, FLAIR, T1w, T1wCE) and 1 inverse model on 1940 slices from 18 BCMB patients, and tested on 437 slices from another 9 BCMB patients. Results Root Mean Square Percent Error (RMSPE) within the GTV between predicted and ground-truth post-RT images for the 5 forward models, in 136 test slices containing GTV, were (mean ± SD) 0.12 ± 0.044 (ADC), 0.14 ± 0.066 (T2w), 0.08 ± 0.038 (T1w), 0.13 ± 0.058 (T1wCE), and 0.09 ± 0.056 (FLAIR). RMSPE within the GTV on the same 136 test slices, between the predicted and ground-truth dose maps, was 0.37 ± 0.20 for the inverse model. Conclusions A deep learning-based approach for radiologic outcome-optimized dose planning in SRS of BCMB has been demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shraddha Pandey
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Mahmoud A. Abdalah
- Quantitative Imaging Shared Service, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Olya Stringfield
- Quantitative Imaging Shared Service, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Harshan Ravi
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Matthew N. Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jasmine A. Graham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Wilfrido A. Moreno
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Kamran A. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Natarajan Raghunand
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Basree MM, Li C, Um H, Bui AH, Liu M, Ahmed A, Tiwari P, McMillan AB, Baschnagel AM. Leveraging radiomics and machine learning to differentiate radiation necrosis from recurrence in patients with brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2024; 168:307-316. [PMID: 38689115 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04669-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Radiation necrosis (RN) can be difficult to radiographically discern from tumor progression after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of radiomics and machine learning (ML) to differentiate RN from recurrence in patients with brain metastases treated with SRS. METHODS Patients with brain metastases treated with SRS who developed either RN or tumor reccurence were retrospectively identified. Image preprocessing and radiomic feature extraction were performed using ANTsPy and PyRadiomics, yielding 105 features from MRI T1-weighted post-contrast (T1c), T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. Univariate analysis assessed significance of individual features. Multivariable analysis employed various classifiers on features identified as most discriminative through feature selection. ML models were evaluated through cross-validation, selecting the best model based on area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score were computed. RESULTS Sixty-six lesions from 55 patients were identified. On univariate analysis, 27 features from the T1c sequence were statistically significant, while no features were significant from the T2 or FLAIR sequences. For clinical variables, only immunotherapy use after SRS was significant. Multivariable analysis of features from the T1c sequence yielded an AUC of 76.2% (standard deviation [SD] ± 12.7%), with specificity and sensitivity of 75.5% (± 13.4%) and 62.3% (± 19.6%) in differentiating radionecrosis from recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Radiomics with ML may assist the diagnostic ability of distinguishing RN from tumor recurrence after SRS. Further work is needed to validate this in a larger multi-institutional cohort and prospectively evaluate it's utility in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa M Basree
- Deparment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Chengnan Li
- Department of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Hyemin Um
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Anthony H Bui
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Manlu Liu
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Azam Ahmed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Pallavi Tiwari
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Alan B McMillan
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Andrew M Baschnagel
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhou F, Jiang L, Sun X, Wang Z, Feng J, Liu M, Ma Z. Surgery of enlarging lesions after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with oncogenic driver mutations frequently reveals radiation necrosis: case series and review. APMIS 2024; 132:375-381. [PMID: 38466886 DOI: 10.1111/apm.13402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
In brain metastases, radiation necrosis (RN) is a complication that arises after single or multiple fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/FSRS), which is challenging to distinguish from local recurrence (LR). Studies have shown increased RN incidence rates in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oncogenic driver mutations (ODMs) or receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study investigated enlarging brain lesions following SRS/FSRS, for which additional surgeries were performed to distinguish between RN and LR. We investigated seven NSCLC patients with ODMs undergoing SRS/FSRS for BM and undergoing surgery for suspicion of LR on MRI imaging. Descriptive statistics were performed. Among the seven patients, six were EGFR+, while one was ALK+. The median irradiation dose was 30 Gy (range, 20-35 Gy). The median time to develop RN after SRS/FSRS was 11.1 months (range: 6.3-31.2 months). Moreover, gradually enlarging lesions were found in all patients after 6 months post-SRS/FSR. Brain radiation necrosis was pathologically confirmed in all the patients. RN should be suspected in NSCLC patients when lesions keep enlarging after 6 months post-SRS/FSRS, especially for patients with ODMs and receiving TKIs. Further, this case series indicates that further dose reduction might be necessary to avoid RN for such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Zhou
- Departments of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Leilei Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xuankai Sun
- Departments of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Departments of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Jialin Feng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Departments of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Zhao Ma
- Departments of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ajithkumar T, Avanzo M, Yorke E, Tsang DS, Milano MT, Olch AJ, Merchant TE, Dieckmann K, Mahajan A, Fuji H, Paulino AC, Timmermann B, Marks LB, Bentzen SM, Jackson A, Constine LS. Brain and Brain Stem Necrosis After Reirradiation for Recurrent Childhood Primary Central Nervous System Tumors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:655-668. [PMID: 38300187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reirradiation is increasingly used in children and adolescents/young adults (AYA) with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) reirradiation task force aimed to quantify risks of brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1975 to 2021 identified 92 studies on reirradiation for recurrent tumors in children/AYA. Seventeen studies representing 449 patients who reported brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation contained sufficient data for analysis. While all 17 studies described techniques and doses used for reirradiation, they lacked essential details on clinically significant dose-volume metrics necessary for dose-response modeling on late effects. We, therefore, estimated incidences of necrosis with an exact 95% CI and qualitatively described data. Results from multiple studies were pooled by taking the weighted average of the reported crude rates from individual studies. RESULTS Treated cancers included ependymoma (n = 279 patients; 7 studies), medulloblastoma (n = 98 patients; 6 studies), any CNS tumors (n = 62 patients; 3 studies), and supratentorial high-grade gliomas (n = 10 patients; 1 study). The median interval between initial and reirradiation was 2.3 years (range, 1.2-4.75 years). The median cumulative prescription dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD22; assuming α/β value = 2 Gy) was 103.8 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy). Among 449 reirradiated children/AYA, 22 (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) developed brain necrosis and 14 (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.2%) developed brain stem necrosis with a weighted median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-7.4 years). The median cumulative prescription EQD22 was 111.4 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for development of any necrosis, 107.7 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for brain necrosis, and 112.1 Gy (range, 100.2-117 Gy) for brain stem necrosis. The median latent period between reirradiation and the development of necrosis was 5.7 months (range, 4.3-24 months). Though there were more events among children/AYA undergoing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated reirradiation, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS Existing reports suggest that in children/AYA with recurrent brain tumors, reirradiation with a total EQD22 of about 112 Gy is associated with an approximate 5% to 7% incidence of brain/brain stem necrosis after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (with the initial course of radiation therapy being given with conventional prescription doses of ≤2 Gy per fraction and the second course with variable fractionations). We recommend a uniform approach for reporting dosimetric endpoints to derive robust predictive models of late toxicities following reirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thankamma Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Michele Avanzo
- Division of Medical Physics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Soren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Radiation Oncology, and University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Doğan B, Demir H, Işık N, Gunalp G, Günbey HP, Yaprak G. Investigation of the risk factors in the development of radionecrosis in patients with brain metastases undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1022-1028. [PMID: 38426391 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidence, timing, and the factors predictors radionecrosis (RN) development in brain metastases (BMs) undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). METHODS The study evaluated 245 BMs who exclusively received SRT between 2010 and 2020. RN was detected pathologically or radiologically. RESULTS The median of follow-up was 22.6 months. RN was detected in 18.4% of the metastatic lesions, and 3.3% symptomatic, 15.1% asymptomatic. The median time of RN was 22.8 months (2.5-39.5), and the rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 16.8%, 41.4%, and 66%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that Graded Prognostic Assessment (P = .005), Score Index of Radiosurgery (P = .015), Recursive Partitioning Analysis (P = .011), the presence of primary cancer (P = .004), and localization (P = .048) significantly increased the incidence of RN. No significant relationship between RN and brain-gross tumour volume doses, planning target volume, fractionation, dose (P > .05). Multivariate analysis identified SIR > 6 (OR: 1.30, P = .021), primary of breast tumour (OR: 2.33, P = .031) and supratentorial localization (OR: 3.64, P = .025) as risk factors. CONCLUSIONS SRT is used effectively in BMs. The incidence of RN following SRT is undeniably frequent. It was observed that the incidence rate increased as the follow-up period increased. We showed that brain-GTV doses are not predictive of RN development, unlike other publications. In study, a high SIR score and supratentorial localization were identified as factors that increased the risk of RN. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE RN is still a common complication after SRT. Symptomatic RN is a significant cause of morbidity. The causes of RN are still not clearly identified. In many publications, brain dose and volumes have been found to be effective in RN. But, with this study, we found that brain dose volumes and fractionation did not increase the incidence of RN when brain doses were taken into account. The most important factor in the development of RN was found to be related to long survival after SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bedriye Doğan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Malatya, 44280, Turkey
| | - Harun Demir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Konya, 42020, Turkey
| | - Naciye Işık
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Istanbul, 34100, Turkey
| | - Gun Gunalp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Istanbul, 34100, Turkey
| | - Hediye Pınar Günbey
- Department of Radiology, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Istanbul, 34100, Turkey
| | - Gökhan Yaprak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr Lutfi Kırdar City Hospital, İstanbul, Istanbul, 34100, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ene CI, Abi Faraj C, Beckham TH, Weinberg JS, Andersen CR, Haider AS, Rao G, Ferguson SD, Alvarez-Brenkenridge CA, Kim BYS, Heimberger AB, McCutcheon IE, Prabhu SS, Wang CM, Ghia AJ, McGovern SL, Chung C, McAleer MF, Tom MC, Perni S, Swanson TA, Yeboa DN, Briere TM, Huse JT, Fuller GN, Lang FF, Li J, Suki D, Sawaya RE. Response of treatment-naive brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3728. [PMID: 38697991 PMCID: PMC11066027 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47998-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
With improvements in survival for patients with metastatic cancer, long-term local control of brain metastases has become an increasingly important clinical priority. While consensus guidelines recommend surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lesions >3 cm, smaller lesions (≤3 cm) treated with SRS alone elicit variable responses. To determine factors influencing this variable response to SRS, we analyzed outcomes of brain metastases ≤3 cm diameter in patients with no prior systemic therapy treated with frame-based single-fraction SRS. Following SRS, 259 out of 1733 (15%) treated lesions demonstrated MRI findings concerning for local treatment failure (LTF), of which 202 /1733 (12%) demonstrated LTF and 54/1733 (3%) had an adverse radiation effect. Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size (>1.5 cm) and melanoma histology were associated with higher LTF rates. Our results demonstrate that brain metastases ≤3 cm are not uniformly responsive to SRS and suggest that prospective studies to evaluate the effect of SRS alone or in combination with surgery on brain metastases ≤3 cm matched by tumor size and histology are warranted. These studies will help establish multi-disciplinary treatment guidelines that improve local control while minimizing radiation necrosis during treatment of brain metastasis ≤3 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Christina Abi Faraj
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas H Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clark R Andersen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ali S Haider
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Betty Y S Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sujit S Prabhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chenyang Michael Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Subha Perni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tina M Briere
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory N Fuller
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dima Suki
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Raymond E Sawaya
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Affairs, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mayo ZS, Billena C, Suh JH, Lo SS, Chao ST. The dilemma of radiation necrosis from diagnosis to treatment in the management of brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S56-S65. [PMID: 38437665 PMCID: PMC10911797 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiation therapy is a mainstay of treatment for patients with brain metastases. The use of SRS in the management of brain metastases is becoming increasingly common and provides excellent local control. Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN) is a late complication of radiation treatment that can be seen months to years following treatment and is often indistinguishable from tumor progression on conventional imaging. In this review article, we explore risk factors associated with the development of radiation necrosis, advanced imaging modalities used to aid in diagnosis, and potential treatment strategies to manage side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Cole Billena
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Prabhu RS, Akinyelu T, Vaslow ZK, Matsui JK, Haghighi N, Dan T, Mishra MV, Murphy ES, Boyles S, Perlow HK, Palmer JD, Udovicich C, Patel TR, Wardak Z, Woodworth GF, Ksendzovsky A, Yang K, Chao ST, Asher AL, Burri SH. Single-Fraction Versus Fractionated Preoperative Radiosurgery for Resected Brain Metastases: A PROPS-BM International Multicenter Cohort Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:650-661. [PMID: 37717787 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a feasible alternative to postoperative SRS for resected brain metastases (BM). Most reported studies of preoperative SRS used single-fraction SRS (SF-SRS). The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and toxicity of preoperative SF-SRS with multifraction (3-5 fractions) SRS (MF-SRS) in a large international multicenter cohort (Preoperative Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases-PROPS-BM). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with BM from solid cancers, of which at least 1 lesion was treated with preoperative SRS followed by planned resection, were included from 8 institutions. SRS to synchronous intact BM was allowed. Exclusion criteria included prior or planned whole brain radiation therapy. Intracranial outcomes were estimated using cumulative incidence with competing risk of death. Propensity score matched (PSM) analyses were performed. RESULTS The study cohort included 404 patients with 416 resected index lesions, of which SF-SRS and MF-SRS were used for 317 (78.5%) and 87 patients (21.5%), respectively. Median dose was 15 Gy in 1 fraction for SF-SRS and 24 Gy in 3 fractions for MF-SRS. Univariable analysis demonstrated that SF-SRS was associated with higher cavity local recurrence (LR) compared with MF-SRS (2-year: 16.3% vs 2.9%; P = .004), which was also demonstrated in multivariable analysis. PSM yielded 81 matched pairs (n = 162). PSM analysis also demonstrated significantly higher rate of cavity LR with SF-SRS (2-year: 19.8% vs 3.3%; P = .003). There was no difference in adverse radiation effect, meningeal disease, or overall survival between cohorts in either analysis. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative MF-SRS was associated with significantly reduced risk of cavity LR in both the unmatched and PSM analyses. There was no difference in adverse radiation effect, meningeal disease, or overall survival based on fractionation. MF-SRS may be a preferred option for neoadjuvant radiation therapy of resected BMs. Additional confirmatory studies are needed. A phase 3 randomized trial of single-fraction preoperative versus postoperative SRS (NRG-BN012) is ongoing (NCT05438212).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshan S Prabhu
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina.
| | - Tobi Akinyelu
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Zachary K Vaslow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer K Matsui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Neda Haghighi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne Victoria, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Icon Cancer Centre, Epworth Centre, Richmond Victoria, Australia
| | - Tu Dan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mark V Mishra
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Susan Boyles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, North Carolina
| | - Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Cristian Udovicich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne Victoria, Australia
| | - Toral R Patel
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Zabi Wardak
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Graeme F Woodworth
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alexander Ksendzovsky
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kailin Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anthony L Asher
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Stuart H Burri
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ortiz de Mendivil A, Martín-Medina P, García-Cañamaque L, Jiménez-Munarriz B, Ciérvide R, Diamantopoulos J. Challenges in radiological evaluation of brain metastases, beyond progression. RADIOLOGIA 2024; 66:166-180. [PMID: 38614532 DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
MRI is the cornerstone in the evaluation of brain metastases. The clinical challenges lie in discriminating metastases from mimickers such as infections or primary tumors and in evaluating the response to treatment. The latter sometimes leads to growth, which must be framed as pseudo-progression or radionecrosis, both inflammatory phenomena attributable to treatment, or be considered as recurrence. To meet these needs, imaging techniques are the subject of constant research. However, an exponential growth after radiotherapy must be interpreted with caution, even in the presence of results suspicious of tumor progression by advanced techniques, because it may be due to inflammatory changes. The aim of this paper is to familiarize the reader with inflammatory phenomena of brain metastases treated with radiotherapy and to describe two related radiological signs: "the inflammatory cloud" and "incomplete ring enhancement", in order to adopt a conservative management with close follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ortiz de Mendivil
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Sección de Neurorradiología, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
| | - P Martín-Medina
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Sección de Neurorradiología, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - B Jiménez-Munarriz
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Ciérvide
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Salans M, Ni L, Morin O, Ziemer B, Capaldi DPI, Raleigh DR, Vasudevan HN, Chew J, Nakamura J, Sneed PK, Boreta L, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Theodosopoulos P, Braunstein S. Adverse radiation effect versus tumor progression following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Implications of radiologic uncertainty. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:535-546. [PMID: 38316705 PMCID: PMC10876820 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04578-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse radiation effect (ARE) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is challenging to distinguish from tumor progression. This study characterizes the clinical implications of radiologic uncertainty (RU). METHODS Cases reviewed retrospectively at a single-institutional, multi-disciplinary SRS Tumor Board between 2015-2022 for RU following SRS were identified. Treatment history, diagnostic or therapeutic interventions performed upon RU resolution, and development of neurologic deficits surrounding intervention were obtained from the medical record. Differences in lesion volume and maximum diameter at RU onset versus resolution were compared with paired t-tests. Median time from RU onset to resolution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate associations between clinical characteristics and time to RU resolution were assessed with Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS Among 128 lesions with RU, 23.5% had undergone ≥ 2 courses of radiation. Median maximum diameter (20 vs. 16 mm, p < 0.001) and volume (2.7 vs. 1.5 cc, p < 0.001) were larger upon RU resolution versus onset. RU resolution took > 6 and > 12 months in 25% and 7% of cases, respectively. Higher total EQD2 prior to RU onset (HR = 0.45, p = 0.03) and use of MR perfusion (HR = 0.56, p = 0.001) correlated with shorter time to resolution; larger volume (HR = 1.05, p = 0.006) portended longer time to resolution. Most lesions (57%) were diagnosed as ARE. Most patients (58%) underwent an intervention upon RU resolution; of these, 38% developed a neurologic deficit surrounding intervention. CONCLUSIONS RU resolution took > 6 months in > 25% of cases. RU may lead to suboptimal outcomes and symptom burden. Improved characterization of post-SRS RU is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Salans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Lisa Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Olivier Morin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Benjamin Ziemer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Dante P I Capaldi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - David R Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (DRR), San Francisco, USA
| | - Harish N Vasudevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
| | - Jessica Chew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Jean Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Penny K Sneed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Lauren Boreta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco (JEVM), San Francisco, USA
| | - Philip Theodosopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco (DRR, JEVM, PT), San Francisco, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (MS, LN, OM, BZ, DPIC, DRR, HNV, JC, JN, PKS, LB, SB), 505 Parnassus Ave, L75, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gao M, Wang X, Wang X, Niu G, Liu X, Zhao S, Wang Y, Yu H, Huo S, Su H, Song Y, Wang X, Zhuang H, Yuan Z. Can low-dose intravenous bevacizumab be as effective as high-dose bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis? Cancer Sci 2024; 115:589-599. [PMID: 38146096 PMCID: PMC10859604 DOI: 10.1111/cas.16053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Although intravenous bevacizumab (IVBEV) is the most promising treatment for cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN), there is no conclusion on the optimal dosage. Our retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose with low-dose IVBEV in treating CRN associated with radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs). This paper describes 75 patients who were diagnosed with CRN secondary to radiotherapy for BMs, treated with low-dose or high-dose IVBEV and followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The clinical data collected for this study include changes in brain MRI, clinical symptoms, and corticosteroid usage before, during, and after IVBEV treatment. At the 3-month mark following administration of IVBEV, a comparison of two groups revealed that the median percentage decreases in CRN volume on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted gadolinium contrast-enhanced image (T1CE), as well as the signal ratio reduction on T1CE, were 65.8% versus 64.8% (p = 0.860), 41.2% versus 51.9% (p = 0.396), and 37.4% versus 35.1% (p = 0.271), respectively. Similarly, at 6 months post-IVBEV, the median percentage reductions of the aforementioned parameters were 59.5% versus 62.0% (p = 0.757), 39.1% versus 31.3% (p = 0.851), and 35.4% versus 28.2% (p = 0.083), respectively. Notably, the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was higher in the high-dose group (n = 4, 9.8%) than in the low-dose group (n = 0). Among patients with CRN secondary to radiotherapy for BMs, the administration of high-dose IVBEV did not demonstrate superiority over low-dose IVBEV. Moreover, the use of high-dose IVBEV was associated with a higher incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events compared with low-dose IVBEV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miaomiao Gao
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Xiaofeng Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Gengmin Niu
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Xiaoye Liu
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Shuzhou Zhao
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Yue Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Huiwen Yu
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Siyuan Huo
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Hui Su
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Yongchun Song
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Xiaoguang Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| | - Hong‐Qing Zhuang
- Department of Radiation OncologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Zhi‐Yong Yuan
- Department of Radiation OncologyTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for CancerTianjinChina
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Garcia MA, Turner A, Brachman DG. The role of GammaTile in the treatment of brain tumors: a technical and clinical overview. J Neurooncol 2024; 166:203-212. [PMID: 38261141 PMCID: PMC10834587 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04523-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Malignant and benign brain tumors with a propensity to recur continue to be a clinical challenge despite decades-long efforts to develop systemic and more advanced local therapies. GammaTile (GT Medical Technologies Inc., Tempe AZ) has emerged as a novel brain brachytherapy device placed during surgery, which starts adjuvant radiotherapy immediately after resection. GammaTile received FDA clearance in 2018 for any recurrent brain tumor and expanded clearance in 2020 to include upfront use in any malignant brain tumor. More than 1,000 patients have been treated with GammaTile to date, and several publications have described technical aspects of the device, workflow, and clinical outcome data. Herein, we review the technical aspects of this brachytherapy treatment, including practical physics principles, discuss the available literature with an emphasis on clinical outcome data in the setting of brain metastases, glioblastoma, and meningioma, and provide an overview of the open and pending clinical trials that are further defining the efficacy and safety of GammaTile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam Turner
- GT Medical Technologies, Inc., Tempe, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lebow ES, Pike LRG, Seidman AD, Moss N, Beal K, Yu Y. Symptomatic Necrosis With Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Concurrent Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1729-1733. [PMID: 37883079 PMCID: PMC10603573 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
This cohort study investigates whether brain metastases that manifest after stereotactic radiotherapy with concurrent antibody-drug conjugates are associated with an increased risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S. Lebow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Luke R. G. Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew D. Seidman
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nelson Moss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, News York, New York
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
DeVries DA, Tang T, Albweady A, Leung A, Laba J, Johnson C, Lagerwaard F, Zindler J, Hajdok G, Ward AD. Predicting stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes with multi-observer qualitative appearance labelling versus MRI radiomics. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20977. [PMID: 38017055 PMCID: PMC10684869 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47702-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Qualitative observer-based and quantitative radiomics-based analyses of T1w contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T1w-CE MRI) have both been shown to predict the outcomes of brain metastasis (BM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Comparison of these methods and interpretation of radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models remains limited. To address this need, we collected a dataset of n = 123 BMs from 99 patients including 12 clinical features, 107 pre-treatment T1w-CE MRI radiomic features, and BM post-SRS progression scores. A previously published outcome model using SRS dose prescription and five-way BM qualitative appearance scoring was evaluated. We found high qualitative scoring interobserver variability across five observers that negatively impacted the model's risk stratification. Radiomics-based ML models trained to replicate the qualitative scoring did so with high accuracy (bootstrap-corrected AUC = 0.84-0.94), but risk stratification using these replicated qualitative scores remained poor. Radiomics-based ML models trained to directly predict post-SRS progression offered enhanced risk stratification (Kaplan-Meier rank-sum p = 0.0003) compared to using qualitative appearance. The qualitative appearance scoring enabled interpretation of the progression radiomics-based ML model, with necrotic BMs and a subset of heterogeneous BMs predicted as being at high-risk of post-SRS progression, in agreement with current radiobiological understanding. Our study's results show that while radiomics-based SRS outcome models out-perform qualitative appearance analysis, qualitative appearance still provides critical insight into ML model operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A DeVries
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada.
- Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - Terence Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Ali Albweady
- Department of Radiology, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, 56219, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Andrew Leung
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Joanna Laba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Carol Johnson
- Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Frank Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, 1081, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Zindler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Hague, 2512VA, The Netherlands
- Holland Proton Centre, Delft, 2629JA, The Netherlands
| | - George Hajdok
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Aaron D Ward
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
- Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, N6A 5W9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, N6A 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alzate JD, Mashiach E, Berger A, Bernstein K, Mullen R, Nigris Vasconcellos FD, Qu T, Silverman JS, Donahue BR, Cooper BT, Sulman EP, Golfinos JG, Kondziolka D. Low-Dose Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in the Era of Modern Systemic Therapy. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:1112-1120. [PMID: 37326435 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Dose selection for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) classically has been based on tumor diameter with a reduction of dose in the settings of prior brain irradiation, larger tumor volumes, and critical brain location. However, retrospective series have shown local control rates to be suboptimal with reduced doses. We hypothesized that lower doses could be effective for specific tumor biologies with concomitant systemic therapies. This study aims to report the local control (LC) and toxicity when using low-dose SRS in the era of modern systemic therapy. METHODS We reviewed 102 patients with 688 tumors managed between 2014 and 2021 who had low-margin dose radiosurgery, defined as ≤14 Gy. Tumor control was correlated with demographic, clinical, and dosimetric data. RESULTS The main primary cancer types were lung in 48 (47.1%), breast in 31 (30.4%), melanoma in 8 (7.8%), and others in 15 patients (11.7%). The median tumor volume was 0.037cc (0.002-26.31 cm 3 ), and the median margin dose was 14 Gy (range 10-14). The local failure (LF) cumulative incidence at 1 and 2 years was 6% and 12%, respectively. On competing risk regression analysis, larger volume, melanoma histology, and margin dose were predictors of LF. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidence of adverse radiation effects (ARE: an adverse imaging-defined response includes increased enhancement and peritumoral edema) was 0.8% and 2%. CONCLUSION It is feasible to achieve acceptable LC in BMs with low-dose SRS. Volume, melanoma histology, and margin dose seem to be predictors for LF. The value of a low-dose approach may be in the management of patients with higher numbers of small or adjacent tumors with a history of whole brain radio therapy or multiple SRS sessions and in tumors in critical locations with the aim of LC and preservation of neurological function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Diego Alzate
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Elad Mashiach
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Assaf Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Kenneth Bernstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Reed Mullen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | | | - Tanxia Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Joshua S Silverman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Bernadine R Donahue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Benjamin T Cooper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Erik P Sulman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - John G Golfinos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| | - Douglas Kondziolka
- Department of Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York University, New York , New York , USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bander ED, El Ahmadieh TY, Chen J, Reiner AS, Brown S, Giantini-Larsen AM, Young RJ, Beal K, Imber BS, Pike LRG, Brennan CW, Tabar V, Panageas KS, Moss NS. Outcomes Following Early Postoperative Adjuvant Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2340654. [PMID: 37906192 PMCID: PMC10618851 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) enhances the local control of resected brain metastases (BrM). However, the risks of local failure (LF) and potential for posttreatment adverse radiation effects (PTRE) after early postoperative adjuvant SRS have not yet been established. Objective To evaluate whether adjuvant SRS delivered within a median of 14 days after surgery is associated with improved LF without a concomitant increase in PTRE. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study examines a clinical workflow (RapidRT) that was implemented from 2019 to 2022 to deliver SRS to surgical patients within a median of 14 days, ensuring all patients were treated within 30 days postoperatively. This prospective cohort was compared with a historical cohort (StanRT) of patients with BrM resected between 2013 and 2019 to assess the association of the RapidRT workflow with LF and PTRE. The 2 cohorts were combined to identify optimal SRS timing, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years for survivors. Exposure Timing of adjuvant SRS (14, 21, and 30 days postoperatively). Main Outcomes and Measures LF and PTRE, according to modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria. Results There were 438 patients (265 [60.5%] female patients; 23 [5.3%] Asian, 27 [6.2%] Black, and 364 [83.1%] White patients) with a mean (SD) age of 62 (13) years; 377 were in the StanRT cohort and 61 in the RapidRT cohort. LF and PTRE rates at 1 year were not significantly different between RapidRT and StanRT cohorts. Timing of SRS was associated with radiographic PTRE. Patients receiving radiation within 14 days had the highest 1-year PTRE rate (18.08%; 95% CI, 8.31%-30.86%), and patients receiving radiation between 22 and 30 days had the lowest 1-year PTRE rate (4.10%; 95% CI, 1.52%-8.73%; P = .03). LF rates were highest for patients receiving radiation more than 30 days from surgery (10.65%; 95% CI, 6.90%-15.32%) but comparable for patients receiving radiation within 14 days, between 15 and 21 days, and between 22 and 30 days (≤14 days: 5.12%; 95% CI, 0.86%-15.60%; 15 to ≤21 days: 3.21%; 95% CI, 0.59%-9.99%; 22 to ≤30 days: 6.58%; 95% CI, 3.06%-11.94%; P = .20). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of adjuvant SRS timing following surgical resection of BrM, the optimal timing for adjuvant SRS appears to be within 22 to 30 days following surgery. The findings of this study suggest that this timing allows for a balanced approach that minimizes the risks associated with LF and PTRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan D. Bander
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
| | - Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Justin Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne S. Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samantha Brown
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alexandra M. Giantini-Larsen
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York
| | - Robert J. Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Brandon S. Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Luke R. G. Pike
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cameron W. Brennan
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Viviane Tabar
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Katherine S. Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nelson S. Moss
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cuschieri A, Borg M, Levinskaia E, Zammit C. LITT for biopsy proven radiation necrosis: A qualitative systematic review. J Clin Neurosci 2023; 116:69-78. [PMID: 37639807 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the widespread use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), post-radiation treatment effects (PTREs) are increasing in prevalence. Radiation necrosis (RN) is a serious PTRE which carries a poor prognosis. Since 2012, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been used to treat RN. However, reviews have attempting to generalise the efficacy of LITT against biopsy-proven RN are limited. In this systematic review, patient demographic characteristics and post-LITT clinical outcomes are characterised. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in four major databases for cohort studies and case reports published between 2012 and 2022, following the PRISMA 2020 checklist. Data was extracted and descriptively analysed. Quality of reporting was assessed using the PROCESS criteria and reporting bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I scoring system. RESULTS Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria, with an overall moderate risk of reporting bias being observed. Mean pre-LITT target lesion volume was 6.75 cm3, and was independent of gender, time since SRS, age and number of interventions prior to LITT. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION LITT is a versatile treatment option which may be used to treat a vast range of patients with refractory biopsy-proven RN. However, neurosurgeons should exercise caution when selecting patients for LITT due to insufficient data on the treatment's efficacy against biopsy-proven RN. This warrants further studies to unequivocally determine the safety and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cuschieri
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Imsida MSD2080, Malta.
| | - Mariah Borg
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Imsida MSD2080, Malta
| | | | - Christian Zammit
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Imsida MSD2080, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Demetz M, Mangesius J, Krigers A, Nevinny-Stickel M, Thomé C, Freyschlag CF, Kerschbaumer J. Tumor Location Impacts the Development of Radiation Necrosis in Benign Intracranial Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4760. [PMID: 37835452 PMCID: PMC10571857 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation necrosis (RN) is a possible late complication of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but only a few risk factors are known. The aim of this study was to assess tumor location in correlation to the development of radiation necrosis for skull base (SB) and non-skull base tumors. METHODS All patients treated with radiosurgery for benign neoplasms (2004-2020) were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical, imaging and medication data were obtained and the largest axial tumor diameter was determined using MRI scans in T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium. The diagnosis of RN was established using imaging parameters. Patients with tumors located at the skull base were compared to patients with tumors in non-skull base locations. RESULTS 205 patients could be included. Overall, 157 tumors (76.6%) were located at the SB and compared to 48 (23.4%) non-SB tumors. Among SB tumors, the most common were vestibular schwannomas (125 cases) and meningiomas (21 cases). In total, 32 (15.6%) patients developed RN after a median of 10 (IqR 5-12) months. Moreover, 62 patients (30.2%) had already undergone at least one surgical resection. In multivariate Cox regression, SB tumors showed a significantly lower risk of radiation necrosis with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.252, p < 0.001, independently of the applied radiation dose. Furthermore, higher radiation doses had a significant impact on the occurrence of RN (HR 1.372, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The risk for the development of RN for SB tumors appears to be low but should not be underestimated. No difference was found between recurrent tumors and newly diagnosed tumors, which may support the value of radiosurgical treatment for patients with recurrent SB tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Demetz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Julian Mangesius
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Aleksandrs Krigers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Claudius Thomé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian F Freyschlag
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Johannes Kerschbaumer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Paddick I, Mott J, Bedford J, Filatov P, Grishchuk D, Orchin G, Houston P, Eaton DJ. Benchmarking Tests of Contemporary SRS Platforms: Have Technological Developments Resulted in Improved Treatment Plan Quality? Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e451-e459. [PMID: 37290672 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery treatment delivery can be performed with a range of devices, each of which have evolved over recent years. We sought to evaluate the differences in performance of contemporary stereotactic radiosurgery platforms and also to compare them with earlier platform iterations from a previous benchmarking study. METHODS AND MATERIALS The following platforms were selected as "state of the art" in 2022: Gamma Knife Icon (GK), CyberKnife S7 (CK), Brainlab Elements (Elekta VersaHD and Varian TrueBeam), Varian Edge with HyperArc (HA), and Zap-X. Six benchmarking cases were used from a 2016 study. To reflect the evolution of increasing numbers of metastases treated per patient, a 14-target case was added. The 28 targets among the 7 patients ranged from 0.02 to 7.2 cc in volume. Participating centers were sent images and contours for each patient and asked to plan them to the best of their ability. Although some variation in local practice was allowed (eg, margins), groups were asked to prescribe a specified dose to each target and tolerance doses to organs at risk were agreed upon. Parameters compared included coverage, selectivity, Paddick conformity index, gradient index (GI), R50%, efficiency index, doses to organs at risk, and planning and treatment times. RESULTS Mean coverage for all targets ranged from 98.2% (Brainlab/Elekta) to 99.7% (HA-6X). Paddick conformity index values ranged from 0.722 (Zap-X) to 0.894 (CK). GI ranged from a mean of 3.52 (GK), representing the steepest dose gradient, to 5.08 (HA-10X). The GI appeared to follow a trend with beam energy, with the lowest values from the lower energy platforms (GK, 1.25 MeV; Zap-X, 3 MV) and the highest value from the highest energy (HA-10X). Mean R50% values ranged from 4.48 (GK) to 5.98 (HA-10X). Treatment times were lowest for C-arm linear accelerators. CONCLUSIONS Compared with earlier studies, newer equipment appears to deliver higher quality treatments. CyberKnife and linear accelerator platforms appear to give higher conformity whereas lower energy platforms yield a steeper dose gradient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Paddick
- Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Judith Mott
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - James Bedford
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Petr Filatov
- Department of Medical Physics, GenesisCare, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Grishchuk
- Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gavin Orchin
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Department of Radiotherapy Physics, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Houston
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Physics, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - David J Eaton
- Department of Medical Physics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cao Y, Parekh VS, Lee E, Chen X, Redmond KJ, Pillai JJ, Peng L, Jacobs MA, Kleinberg LR. A Multidimensional Connectomics- and Radiomics-Based Advanced Machine-Learning Framework to Distinguish Radiation Necrosis from True Progression in Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4113. [PMID: 37627141 PMCID: PMC10452423 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
We introduce tumor connectomics, a novel MRI-based complex graph theory framework that describes the intricate network of relationships within the tumor and surrounding tissue, and combine this with multiparametric radiomics (mpRad) in a machine-learning approach to distinguish radiation necrosis (RN) from true progression (TP). Pathologically confirmed cases of RN vs. TP in brain metastases treated with SRS were included from a single institution. The region of interest was manually segmented as the single largest diameter of the T1 post-contrast (T1C) lesion plus the corresponding area of T2 FLAIR hyperintensity. There were 40 mpRad features and 6 connectomics features extracted, as well as 5 clinical and treatment factors. We developed an Integrated Radiomics Informatics System (IRIS) based on an Isomap support vector machine (IsoSVM) model to distinguish TP from RN using leave-one-out cross-validation. Class imbalance was resolved with differential misclassification weighting during model training using the IRIS. In total, 135 lesions in 110 patients were analyzed, including 43 cases (31.9%) of pathologically proven RN and 92 cases (68.1%) of TP. The top-performing connectomics features were three centrality measures of degree, betweenness, and eigenvector centralities. Combining these with the 10 top-performing mpRad features, an optimized IsoSVM model was able to produce a sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.84, AUC-ROC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.94), and AUC-PR of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Vishwa S. Parekh
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
- University of Maryland Medical Intelligent Imaging (UM2ii) Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 20201, USA
| | - Emerson Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Xuguang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| | - Kristin J. Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Jay J. Pillai
- Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Luke Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Michael A. Jacobs
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
- Department of Diagnostics and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lawrence R. Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Prabhu RS, Akinyelu T, Vaslow ZK, Matsui JK, Haghighi N, Dan T, Mishra MV, Murphy ES, Boyles S, Perlow HK, Palmer JD, Udovicich C, Patel TR, Wardak Z, Woodworth GF, Ksendzovsky A, Yang K, Chao ST, Asher AL, Burri SH. Risk Factors for Progression and Toxic Effects After Preoperative Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients With Resected Brain Metastases. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1066-1073. [PMID: 37289451 PMCID: PMC10251241 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.1629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Importance Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been demonstrated as a feasible alternative to postoperative SRS for resectable brain metastases (BMs) with potential benefits in adverse radiation effects (AREs) and meningeal disease (MD). However, mature large-cohort multicenter data are lacking. Objective To evaluate preoperative SRS outcomes and prognostic factors from a large international multicenter cohort (Preoperative Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases-PROPS-BM). Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter cohort study included patients with BMs from solid cancers, of which at least 1 lesion received preoperative SRS and a planned resection, from 8 institutions. Radiosurgery to synchronous intact BMs was allowed. Exclusion criteria included prior or planned whole-brain radiotherapy and no cranial imaging follow-up. Patients were treated between 2005 and 2021, with most treated between 2017 and 2021. Exposures Preoperative SRS to a median dose to 15 Gy in 1 fraction or 24 Gy in 3 fractions delivered at a median (IQR) of 2 (1-4) days before resection. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end points were cavity local recurrence (LR), MD, ARE, overall survival (OS), and multivariable analysis of prognostic factors associated with these outcomes. Results The study cohort included 404 patients (214 women [53%]; median [IQR] age, 60.6 [54.0-69.6] years) with 416 resected index lesions. The 2-year cavity LR rate was 13.7%. Systemic disease status, extent of resection, SRS fractionation, type of surgery (piecemeal vs en bloc), and primary tumor type were associated with cavity LR risk. The 2-year MD rate was 5.8%, with extent of resection, primary tumor type, and posterior fossa location being associated with MD risk. The 2-year any-grade ARE rate was 7.4%, with target margin expansion greater than 1 mm and melanoma primary being associated with ARE risk. Median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI, 14.1-21.3 months), with systemic disease status, extent of resection, and primary tumor type being the strongest prognostic factors associated with OS. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, the rates of cavity LR, ARE, and MD after preoperative SRS were found to be notably low. Several tumor and treatment factors were identified that are associated with risk of cavity LR, ARE, MD, and OS after treatment with preoperative SRS. A phase 3 randomized clinical trial of preoperative vs postoperative SRS (NRG BN012) has began enrolling (NCT05438212).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshan S. Prabhu
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Tobi Akinyelu
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Neda Haghighi
- Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Icon Cancer Centre, Epworth Centre, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tu Dan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | - Erin S. Murphy
- Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Susan Boyles
- Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - Zabi Wardak
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | | | - Kailin Yang
- Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel T. Chao
- Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anthony L. Asher
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Stuart H. Burri
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Soffietti R, Pellerino A, Bruno F, Mauro A, Rudà R. Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10669. [PMID: 37445846 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Research regarding the mechanisms of brain damage following radiation treatments for brain tumors has increased over the years, thus providing a deeper insight into the pathobiological mechanisms and suggesting new approaches to minimize this damage. This review has discussed the different factors that are known to influence the risk of damage to the brain (mainly cognitive disturbances) from radiation. These include patient and tumor characteristics, the use of whole-brain radiotherapy versus particle therapy (protons, carbon ions), and stereotactic radiotherapy in various modalities. Additionally, biological mechanisms behind neuroprotection have been elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mauro
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
- I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Division of Neurology and Neuro-Rehabilitation, San Giuseppe Hospital, 28824 Piancavallo, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Beddok A, Loi M, Rivin Del Campo E, Dumas JL, Orthuon A, Créhange G, Huguet F. [Limits of dose constraint definition for organs at risk specific to stereotactic radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2023:S1278-3218(23)00067-7. [PMID: 37208260 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy is a very hypofractionated radiotherapy (>7.5Gy per fraction), and therefore is more likely to induce late toxicities than conventional normofractionated irradiations. The present study examines four frequent and potentially serious late toxicities: brain radionecrosis, radiation pneumonitis, radiation myelitis, and radiation-induced pelvic toxicities. The critical review focuses on the toxicity scales, the definition of the dose constrained volume, the dosimetric parameters, and the non-dosimetric risk factors. The most commonly used toxicity scales remain: RTOG/EORTC or common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). The definition of organ-at-risk volume requiring protection is often controversial, which limits the comparability of studies and the possibility of accurate dose constraints. Nevertheless, for the brain, whatever the indication (arteriovenous malformation, benign tumor, metastasis of solid tumors...), the association between the volume of brain receiving 12Gy (V12Gy) and the risk of cerebral radionecrosis is well established for both single and multi-fraction stereotactic irradiation. For the lung, the average dose received by both lungs and the V20 seem to correlate well with the risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis. For the spinal cord, the maximum dose is the most consensual parameter. Clinical trial protocols are useful for nonconsensual dose constraints. Non-dosimetric risk factors should be considered when validating the treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Beddok
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm, Lito U1288, 75005 Orsay, France; Service de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France.
| | - M Loi
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italie
| | - E Rivin Del Campo
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France; Faculté de médecine, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - J-L Dumas
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France
| | - A Orthuon
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - G Créhange
- Institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm, Lito U1288, 75005 Orsay, France; Service de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Curie, université PSL, Paris, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service de radiothérapie oncologique, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France; Faculté de médecine, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ikawa T, Kanayama N, Arita H, Ohira S, Takano K, Hirata T, Morimoto M, Teshima T, Konishi K. Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, carries a low incidence of acute toxicities: a retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:80. [PMID: 37165431 PMCID: PMC10173492 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02262-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on acute toxicities after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and nature of toxicities immediately after SRT using a linear accelerator. METHODS This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 315 patients with brain metastases treated with SRT at our institution between May 2019 and February 2022. In total, 439 SRT sessions were performed for 2161 brain metastases. The outcome of interest was immediate side effects (ISEs), defined as new or worsening symptoms occurring during SRT or within 14 days after the end of SRT. RESULTS Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 ISEs occurred in 16 (3.6%) and 7 (1.6%) cases, respectively. Among 63 treatments for 10 or more lesions (range: 10-40), 1 (1.6%) ISE occurred. Among 22 treatments for lesions with a maximum tumor volume of > 10 cc, 2 (9.1%) ISEs occurred. Grade ≥ 3 ISEs included 1, 4, 1, and 1 cases of grade 3 nausea, grade 3 new-onset partial and generalized seizures, grade 3 obstructive hydrocephalus, and grade 5 intracranial hemorrhage, respectively. ISEs were more common in patients with a larger maximum tumor volume, primary sites other than lung and breast cancer, and pre-treatment neurological symptoms. CONCLUSION SRT using a linear accelerator for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, is safe, with a low incidence of ISEs. Serious complications immediately after SRT are rare but possible; therefore, careful follow-up is necessary after treatment initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiki Ikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Naoyuki Kanayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Arita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shingo Ohira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Takano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takero Hirata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiro Morimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tijtgat J, Calliauw E, Dirven I, Vounckx M, Kamel R, Vanbinst AM, Everaert H, Seynaeve L, Van Den Berge D, Duerinck J, Neyns B. Low-Dose Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Focal Radiation Necrosis of the Brain (fRNB): A Single-Center Case Series. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092560. [PMID: 37174026 PMCID: PMC10177060 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Focal radiation necrosis of the brain (fRNB) is a late adverse event that can occur following the treatment of benign or malignant brain lesions with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Recent studies have shown that the incidence of fRNB is higher in cancer patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. The use of bevacizumab (BEV), a monoclonal antibody that targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is an effective treatment for fRNB when given at a dose of 5-7.5 mg/kg every two weeks. In this single-center retrospective case series, we investigated the effectiveness of a low-dose regimen of BEV (400 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg every 4 weeks) in patients diagnosed with fRNB. A total of 13 patients were included in the study; twelve of them experienced improvement in their existing clinical symptoms, and all patients had a decrease in the volume of edema on MRI scans. No clinically significant treatment-related adverse effects were observed. Our preliminary findings suggest that this fixed low-dose regimen of BEV can be a well-tolerated and cost-effective alternative treatment option for patients diagnosed with fRNB, and it is deserving of further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Tijtgat
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Evan Calliauw
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iris Dirven
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manon Vounckx
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Randa Kamel
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Marie Vanbinst
- Department of Medical Imaging, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hendrik Everaert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laura Seynaeve
- Department of Neurology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Den Berge
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Johnny Duerinck
- Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vaios EJ, Winter SF, Shih HA, Dietrich J, Peters KB, Floyd SR, Kirkpatrick JP, Reitman ZJ. Novel Mechanisms and Future Opportunities for the Management of Radiation Necrosis in Patients Treated for Brain Metastases in the Era of Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2432. [PMID: 37173897 PMCID: PMC10177360 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation necrosis, also known as treatment-induced necrosis, has emerged as an important adverse effect following stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) for brain metastases. The improved survival of patients with brain metastases and increased use of combined systemic therapy and SRS have contributed to a growing incidence of necrosis. The cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) and stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway (cGAS-STING) represents a key biological mechanism linking radiation-induced DNA damage to pro-inflammatory effects and innate immunity. By recognizing cytosolic double-stranded DNA, cGAS induces a signaling cascade that results in the upregulation of type 1 interferons and dendritic cell activation. This pathway could play a key role in the pathogenesis of necrosis and provides attractive targets for therapeutic development. Immunotherapy and other novel systemic agents may potentiate activation of cGAS-STING signaling following radiotherapy and increase necrosis risk. Advancements in dosimetric strategies, novel imaging modalities, artificial intelligence, and circulating biomarkers could improve the management of necrosis. This review provides new insights into the pathophysiology of necrosis and synthesizes our current understanding regarding the diagnosis, risk factors, and management options of necrosis while highlighting novel avenues for discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene J. Vaios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Sebastian F. Winter
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Helen A. Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Katherine B. Peters
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Zachary J. Reitman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shiue K, Sahgal A, Lo SS. Precision Radiation for Brain Metastases With a Focus on Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:114-128. [PMID: 36990629 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
There are multiple published randomized controlled trials supporting single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) for patients presenting with 1 to 4 brain metastases, with the benefit of minimizing radiation-induced neurocognitive sequelae as compared to whole brain radiotherapy . More recently, the dogma of SF-SRS as the only means of delivering an SRS treatment has been challenged by hypofractionated SRS (HF-SRS). The ability to deliver 25-35 Gy in 3-5 HF-SRS fractions is a direct consequence of the evolution of radiation technologies to allow image guidance, specialized treatment planning, robotic delivery and/or patient positioning corrections in all 6 degrees-of-freedom, and frameless head immobilization. The intent is to mitigate the potentially devastating complication of radiation necrosis and improve rates of local control for larger metastases. This narrative review provides an overview of outcomes specific to HF-SRS in addition to the more recent developments of staged SRS, preoperative SRS, and hippocampal avoidance-whole brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost.
Collapse
|
34
|
Thomson HM, Fortin Ensign SP, Edmonds VS, Sharma A, Butterfield RJ, Schild SE, Ashman JB, Zimmerman RS, Patel NP, Bryce AH, Vora SA, Sio TT, Porter AB. Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Related Radiation
Necrosis in Patients with Intracranial Metastasis from Melanoma. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2023; 17:11795549231161878. [PMID: 36968334 PMCID: PMC10034291 DOI: 10.1177/11795549231161878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiation necrosis (RN) is a clinically relevant complication of stereotactic
radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial metastasis (ICM) treatments. Radiation
necrosis development is variable following SRS. It remains unclear if risk
factors for and clinical outcomes following RN may be different for melanoma
patients. We reviewed patients with ICM from metastatic melanoma to
understand the potential impact of RN in this patient population. Methods: Patients who received SRS for ICM from melanoma at Mayo Clinic Arizona
between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included
demographics, tumor characteristics, radiation parameters, prior surgical
and systemic treatments, and patient outcomes. Radiation necrosis was
diagnosed by clinical evaluation including brain magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) and, in some cases, tissue evaluation. Results: Radiation necrosis was diagnosed in 7 (27%) of 26 patients at 1.6 to 38
months following initial SRS. Almost 92% of all patients received systemic
therapy and 35% had surgical resection prior to SRS. Patients with RN
trended toward having larger ICM and a prior history of surgical resection,
although statistical significance was not reached. Among patients with
resection, those who developed RN had a longer period between surgery and
SRS start (mean 44 vs 33 days). Clinical improvement following treatment for
RN was noted in 2 (29%) patients. Conclusions: Radiation necrosis is relatively common following SRS for treatment of ICM
from metastatic melanoma and clinical outcomes are poor. Further studies
aimed at mitigating RN development and identifying novel approaches for
treatment are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly M Thomson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Akanksha Sharma
- Department of Neurology, Pacific
Neurosciences Institute and John Wayne Cancer Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | | | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Naresh P Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alan H Bryce
- Department of Hematology and Oncology,
Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sujay A Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo
Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Hematology and Oncology,
Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Neurology, College of
Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Alyx B Porter, Department of Neurology,
College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Leu J, Akerman M, Mendez C, Lischalk JW, Carpenter T, Ebling D, Haas JA, Witten M, Barbaro M, Duic P, Tessler L, Repka MC. Time interval from diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery is not associated with radionecrosis or local failure. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1132777. [PMID: 37091181 PMCID: PMC10113671 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionBrain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor diagnosed in adults. In patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, the incidence of post-treatment radionecrosis appears to be rising, which has been attributed to improved patient survival as well as novel systemic treatments. The impacts of concomitant immunotherapy and the interval between diagnosis and treatment on patient outcomes are unclear.MethodsThis single institution, retrospective study consisted of patients who received single or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for intact brain metastases. Exclusion criteria included neurosurgical resection prior to treatment and treatment of non-malignant histologies or primary central nervous system malignancies. A univariate screen was implemented to determine which factors were associated with radionecrosis. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the two groups for categorical variables, and the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test was used for continuous data. Those factors that appeared to be associated with radionecrosis on univariate analyses were included in a multivariable model. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess potential predictors of time to local failure and time to regional failure.ResultsA total of 107 evaluable patients with a total of 256 individual brain metastases were identified. The majority of metastases were non-small cell lung cancer (58.98%), followed by breast cancer (16.02%). Multivariable analyses demonstrated increased risk of radionecrosis with increasing MRI maximum axial dimension (OR 1.10, p=0.0123) and a history of previous whole brain radiation therapy (OR 3.48, p=0.0243). Receipt of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a decreased risk of local failure (HR 0.31, p=0.0159). Time interval between diagnostic MRI and first treatment, time interval between CT simulation and first treatment, and concurrent immunotherapy had no impact on incidence of radionecrosis or regional failure.DiscussionAn optimal time interval between diagnosis and treatment for intact brain metastases that minimizes radionecrosis and maximizes local and regional control could not be identified. Concurrent immunotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of radionecrosis and may improve local control. These data further support the safety and synergistic efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Leu
- Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States
| | - Meredith Akerman
- Division of Health Services Research, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Christopher Mendez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
- NYCyberKnife at Perlmutter Cancer Center – Manhattan, New York, NY, United States
| | - Todd Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - David Ebling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan A. Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
- NYCyberKnife at Perlmutter Cancer Center – Manhattan, New York, NY, United States
| | - Matthew Witten
- Department of Medical Physics, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Marissa Barbaro
- Department of Neurology, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Paul Duic
- Department of Neurology, New York University (NYU) Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Lee Tessler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University (NYU) Long Island, Mineola, NY, United States
| | - Michael C. Repka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- *Correspondence: Michael C. Repka,
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yan M, Lee M, Myrehaug S, Tseng CL, Detsky J, Chen H, Das S, Yeboah C, Lipsman N, Costa LD, Holden L, Heyn C, Maralani P, Ruschin M, Sahgal A, Soliman H. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS) as a salvage treatment for brain metastases failing prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). J Neurooncol 2023; 162:119-128. [PMID: 36914878 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04265-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Various treatment options exist to salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) failures for brain metastases, including repeat SRS and hypofractionated SRS (HSRS). Our objective was to report outcomes specific to salvage HSRS for brain metastases that failed prior HSRS/SRS. METHODS Patients treated with HSRS to salvage local failures (LF) following initial HSRS/SRS, between July 2010 and April 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes were the rates of LF, radiation necrosis (RN), and symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses using competing risk regression were performed to identify predictive factors for each endpoint. RESULTS 120 Metastases in 91 patients were identified. The median clinical follow up was 13.4 months (range 1.1-111.1), and the median interval between SRS courses was 13.1 months (range 3.0-56.5). 115 metastases were salvaged with 20-35 Gy in 5 fractions and the remaining five with a total dose ranging from 20 to 24 Gy in 3-fractions. 67 targets (56%) were postoperative cavities. The median re-treatment target volume and biological effective dose (BED10) was 9.5 cc and 37.5 Gy, respectively. The 6- and 12- month LF rates were 18.9% and 27.7%, for RN 13% and 15.6%, and for SRN were 6.1% and 7.0%, respectively. MVA identified larger re-irradiation volume (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, p = 0.04) and shorter interval between radiosurgery courses (HR 0.93, p < 0.001) as predictors of LF. Treatment of an intact target was associated with a higher risk of RN (HR 2.29, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Salvage HSRS results in high local control rates and toxicity rates that compare favorably to those single fraction SRS re-irradiation experiences reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Minha Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Collins Yeboah
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leodante Da Costa
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lori Holden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chinthaka Heyn
- Division of Radiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Division of Radiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Management of initial and recurrent radiation-induced contrast enhancements following radiotherapy for brain metastases: Clinical and radiological impact of bevacizumab and corticosteroids. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100600. [PMID: 36873269 PMCID: PMC9975203 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The appearance of radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) after radiotherapy for brain metastases can go along with severe neurological impairments. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate radiological changes, the course and recurrence of RICE and identify associated prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with brain metastases, who were treated with radiotherapy and subsequently developed RICE. Patient demographic and clinical data, radiation-, cancer-, and RICE-treatment, radiological results, and oncological outcomes were reviewed in detail. Results A total of 95 patients with a median follow-up of 28.8 months were identified. RICE appeared after a median time of 8.0 months after first radiotherapy and 6.4 months after re-irradiation. Bevacizumab in combination with corticosteroids achieved an improvement of clinical symptoms and imaging features in 65.9% and 75.6% of cases, respectively, both significantly superior compared to treatment with corticosteroids only, and further significantly prolonged RICE-progression-free survival to a median of 5.6 months. Recurrence of RICE after initially improved or stable imaging occurred in 63.1% of cases, significantly more often in patients after re-irradiation and was associated with high mortality of 36.6% after the diagnosis of flare-up. Response of recurrence significantly depended on the applied treatment and multiple courses of bevacizumab achieved good response. Conclusion Our results suggest that bevacizumab in combination with corticosteroids is superior in achieving short-term imaging and symptom improvement of RICE and prolongs the progression-free time compared to corticosteroids alone. Long-term RICE flare-up rates after bevacizumab discontinuation are high, but repeated treatments achieved effective symptomatic control.
Collapse
|
38
|
Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Xu Z, Mullen R, Alzate J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Wei Z, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Liscak R, May J, Lee CC, Yang HC, Coupé FL, Mathieu D, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Palmer JD, Perlow HK, Peker S, Samanci Y, Peterson J, Trifiletti DM, Shepard MJ, Elhamdani S, Wegner RE, Speckter H, Hernandez W, Warnick RE, Sheehan J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intraventricular Metastases: A Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:565-573. [PMID: 36512817 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraventricular metastases (IVMs) are uncommon, and their optimal management remains debatable. OBJECTIVE To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of IVMs. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study included patients managed with SRS for IVMs. SRS-induced adverse events, local tumor or intracranial progression, and the frequency of new-onset hydrocephalus or leptomeningeal spread were documented. Analyses of variables related to patient neuroimaging or clinical outcomes were also performed. RESULTS The cohort included 160 patients from 11 centers who underwent SRS for treatment of 1045 intracranial metastases, of which 196 were IVMs. The median survival from SRS was 10 months. Of the 154 patients and 190 IVMs with imaging follow-up, 94 patients (61%) experienced distant intracranial disease progression and 16 IVMs (8.4%) progressed locally. The 12- and 24-month local IVM control rates were 91.4% and 86.1%, respectively. Sixteen (10%) and 27 (17.5%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Adverse radiation effects were documented in 24 patients (15%). Eleven patients (6.9%) died because of intracranial disease progression. CONCLUSION SRS is an effective treatment option for IVMs, with a local IVM control rate comparable with SRS for parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal spread and hydrocephalus in patients with IVM occur in a minority of patients, but these patients warrant careful follow-up to detect these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Reed Mullen
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juan Alzate
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir May
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - François-Louis Coupé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Shahed Elhamdani
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernandez
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dosimetric and clinical analysis of pseudo-progression versus recurrence after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:30. [PMID: 36788610 PMCID: PMC9930329 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02214-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main challenge in follow-up duration of patients with brain metastases after stereotactic radiotherapy is to distinguish between pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence. The objective of this study is to retrospectively analyze the predictive factors. METHODS The study included 123 patients with enlarged brain metastases after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in our center from March 2009 to October 2019, and the baseline clinical features, radiotherapy planning parameters, and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging before and after radiation therapy were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to compare the differences between groups. Independent risk factors with P < 0.05 and associated with recurrence were used to establish a nomogram prediction model and validated by Bootstrap repeated sampling, which was validated in an internal cohort (n = 23) from October 2019 to December 2021. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 68.4 months (range, 8.9-146.2 months). A total of 76 (61.8%) patients were evaluated as pseudo-progression, 47 patients (38.2%) were evaluated as tumor recurrence. The median time to pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence were 18.3 months (quartile range, 9.4-27.8 months) and 12.9 months (quartile range, 8.7-19.6 months) respectively. Variables associated with tumor recurrence included: gross tumor volume ≥ 6 cc, biological effective dose < 60 Gy, target coverage < 96% and no targeted therapy. The area under curve values were 0.730 and 0.967 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Thirty-one patients received salvage therapy in the tumor recurrence group. The survival time in pseudo-progression and tumor recurrence groups were 66.3 months (95% CI 56.8-75.9 months) and 39.6 months (95% CI 29.2-50.0 months, respectively; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Clinical and dosimetry features of hypo-fractionated radiation therapy based on enhanced brain magnetic resonance can help distinguish pseudo-progression from tumor recurrence after hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for brain metastases. Gross tumor volume, biological effective dose, target coverage, and having received targeted therapy or not were factors associated with the occurrence of tumor recurrence, and the individual risk could be estimated by the nomogram effectively.
Collapse
|
40
|
Puac-Polanco P, Zakhari N, Miller J, McComiskey D, Thornhill RE, Jansen GH, Nair VJ, Nguyen TB. Diagnostic Accuracy of Centrally Restricted Diffusion Sign in Cerebral Metastatic Disease: Differentiating Radiation Necrosis from Tumor Recurrence. Can Assoc Radiol J 2023; 74:100-109. [PMID: 35848632 DOI: 10.1177/08465371221115341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The centrally restricted diffusion sign of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is associated with radiation necrosis (RN) in treated gliomas. Our goal was to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy to distinguish RN from tumor recurrence (TR) in treated brain metastases. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive patients with brain metastases who developed a newly centrally necrotic lesion after radiotherapy (RT). One reader placed regions of interest (ROI) in the enhancing solid lesion and the non-enhancing central necrosis on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Two readers qualitatively assessed the presence of the centrally restricted diffusion sign. The final diagnosis was made by histopathology (n = 39) or imaging follow-up (n = 2). Differences between groups were assessed by Fisher's exact or Mann-Whitney U tests. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and kappa scores. Results: Forty-one lesions (32 predominant RN; 9 predominant TR) were analyzed. An ADC value ≤ 1220 × 10-6 mm2/s (sensitivity 74%, specificity 89%, area under the curve [AUC] .85 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .70-.94] P < .0001) from the necrosis and an ADC necrosis/enhancement ratio ≤1.37 (sensitivity 74%, specificity 89%, AUC .82 [95% CI, .67-.93] P < .0001) provided the highest performance for RN diagnosis. The qualitative centrally restricted diffusion sign had a sensitivity of 69% (95% CI, .50-.83), specificity of 77% (95% CI, .40-.96), and a moderate (k = .49) inter-reader agreement for RN diagnosis. Conclusions: Radiation necrosis is associated with lower ADC values in the central necrosis than TR. A moderate interobserver agreement might limit the qualitative assessment of the centrally restricted diffusion sign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Puac-Polanco
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nader Zakhari
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jacob Miller
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - David McComiskey
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca E Thornhill
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Gerard H Jansen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Vimoj J Nair
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI)
| | - Thanh Binh Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, 6363University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Byun J, Kim JH. Revisiting the Role of Surgical Resection for Brain Metastasis. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2023; 11:1-7. [PMID: 36762802 PMCID: PMC9911712 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2022.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common type of brain tumor in adults. The contemporary management of BM remains challenging. Advancements in systemic cancer treatment have increased the survival of patients with cancer. Although the treatment of BM is still complicated, advances in radiotherapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery and chemotherapy, have improved treatment outcomes. Surgical resection is the traditional treatment for BM and its role in the surgical resection of BM has been well established. However, refinement of the surgical resection technique and strategy for BM is needed. Herein, we discuss the evolving role of surgery in patients with BM and the future of BM treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonho Byun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
DeVries DA, Tang T, Alqaidy G, Albweady A, Leung A, Laba J, Lagerwaard F, Zindler J, Hajdok G, Ward AD. Dual-center validation of using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics to predict stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad064. [PMID: 37358938 PMCID: PMC10289521 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background MRI radiomic features and machine learning have been used to predict brain metastasis (BM) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes. Previous studies used only single-center datasets, representing a significant barrier to clinical translation and further research. This study, therefore, presents the first dual-center validation of these techniques. Methods SRS datasets were acquired from 2 centers (n = 123 BMs and n = 117 BMs). Each dataset contained 8 clinical features, 107 pretreatment T1w contrast-enhanced MRI radiomic features, and post-SRS BM progression endpoints determined from follow-up MRI. Random decision forest models were used with clinical and/or radiomic features to predict progression. 250 bootstrap repetitions were used for single-center experiments. Results Training a model with one center's dataset and testing it with the other center's dataset required using a set of features important for outcome prediction at both centers, and achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values up to 0.70. A model training methodology developed using the first center's dataset was locked and externally validated with the second center's dataset, achieving a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.80. Lastly, models trained on pooled data from both centers offered balanced accuracy across centers with an overall bootstrap-corrected AUC of 0.78. Conclusions Using the presented validated methodology, radiomic models trained at a single center can be used externally, though they must utilize features important across all centers. These models' accuracies are inferior to those of models trained using each individual center's data. Pooling data across centers shows accurate and balanced performance, though further validation is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A DeVries
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Terence Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ghada Alqaidy
- Radiodiagnostic and Medical Imaging Department, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Albweady
- Department of Radiology, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Andrew Leung
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Joanna Laba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Frank Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Zindler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands
- Holland Proton Therapy Centre, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - George Hajdok
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron D Ward
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Gerald C. Baines Centre, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Singnurkar A, Poon R, Detsky J. 18F-FET-PET imaging in high-grade gliomas and brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:1-12. [PMID: 36502457 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04201-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide a summary of the diagnostic performance of 18F-FET-PET in the management of patients with high-grade brain gliomas or metastases from extracranial primary malignancies. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched for studies that reported on diagnostic test parameters in radiotherapy planning, response assessment, and tumour recurrence/treatment-related changes differentiation. Radiomic studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool and the GRADE approach. A bivariate, random-effects model was used to produce summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS Twenty-six studies with a total of 1206 patients/lesions were included in the analysis. For radiotherapy planning of glioma, the pooled proportion of patients from 3 studies with 18F-FET uptake extending beyond the 20 mm margin from the gadolinium enhancement on standard MRI was 39% (95% CI, 10-73%). In 3 studies, 18F-FET-PET was also shown to be predictive of early responders to treatment, whereas MRI failed to show any prognostic value. For the differentiation of glioma recurrence from treatment-related changes, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of TBRmax 1.9-2.3 from 6 studies were 91% (95% CI, 74-97%) and 84% (95% CI, 69-93%), respectively. The respective values for brain metastases from 4 studies were 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) and 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) using TBRmax 2.15-3.11. CONCLUSION While 18F-FET shows promise as a complementary modality to standard-of-care MRI for the management of primary and metastatic brain malignancies, further validation with standardized image interpretation methods in well-designed prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Singnurkar
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Raymond Poon
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Department of Oncology, McMaster University McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Program in Evidence-Based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, G Wing, 2nd Floor, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C3, Canada.
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mayo ZS, Halima A, Broughman JR, Smile TD, Tom MC, Murphy ES, Suh JH, Lo SS, Barnett GH, Wu G, Johnson S, Chao ST. Radiation necrosis or tumor progression? A review of the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of cerebral radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:23-31. [PMID: 36633800 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04225-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cerebral radiation necrosis is a complication of radiation therapy that can be seen months to years following radiation treatment. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression on standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often difficult and advanced imaging techniques may be needed to make an accurate diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging modalities used in differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression following radiation therapy for brain metastases. METHODS We performed a review of the literature addressing the radiographic modalities used in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. RESULTS Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains a diagnostic challenge and advanced imaging modalities are often required to make a definitive diagnosis. If diagnostic uncertainty remains following conventional imaging, a multi-modality diagnostic approach with perfusion MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission spectroscopy (SPECT), and radiomics may be used to improve diagnosis. CONCLUSION Several imaging modalities exist to aid in the diagnosis of radiation necrosis. Future studies developing advanced imaging techniques are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Ahmed Halima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - James R Broughman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erin S Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John H Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guiyun Wu
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave CA-50, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. .,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sneed PK, Chan JW, Ma L, Braunstein SE, Theodosopoulos PV, Fogh SE, Nakamura JL, Boreta L, Raleigh DR, Ziemer BP, Morin O, Hervey-Jumper SL, McDermott MW. Adverse radiation effect and freedom from progression following repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. J Neurosurg 2023; 138:104-112. [PMID: 35594891 DOI: 10.3171/2022.4.jns212597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors previously evaluated risk and time course of adverse radiation effects (AREs) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, excluding lesions treated after prior SRS. In the present analysis they focus specifically on single-fraction salvage SRS to brain metastases previously treated with SRS or hypofractionated SRS (HFSRS), evaluating freedom from progression (FFP) and the risk and time course of AREs. METHODS Brain metastases treated from September 1998 to May 2019 with single-fraction SRS after prior SRS or HFSRS were analyzed. Serial follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical pathology reports were reviewed to score local treatment failure and AREs. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate FFP and risk of ARE measured from the date of repeat SRS with censoring at the last brain MRI. RESULTS A total of 229 retreated brain metastases in 124 patients were evaluable. The most common primary cancers were breast, lung, and melanoma. The median interval from prior SRS/HFSRS to repeat SRS was 15.4 months, the median prescription dose was 18 Gy, and the median duration of follow-up imaging was 14.5 months. At 1 year after repeat SRS, FFP was 80% and the risk of symptomatic ARE was 11%. The 1-year risk of imaging changes, including asymptomatic RE and symptomatic ARE, was 30%. Among lesions that demonstrated RE, the median time to onset was 6.7 months (IQR 4.7-9.9 months) and the median time to peak imaging changes was 10.1 months (IQR 5.6-13.6 months). Lesion size by quadratic mean diameter (QMD) showed similar results for QMDs ranging from 0.75 to 2.0 cm (1-year FFP 82%, 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE 11%). For QMD < 0.75 cm, the 1-year FFP was 86% and the 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE was only 2%. Outcomes were worse for QMDs 2.01-3.0 cm (1-year FFP 65%, 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE 24%). The risk of symptomatic ARE was not increased with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy before or after repeat SRS. CONCLUSIONS RE on imaging was common after repeat SRS (30% at 1 year), but the risk of a symptomatic ARE was much less (11% at 1 year). The results of repeat single-fraction SRS were good for brain metastases ≤ 2 cm. The authors recommend an interval ≥ 6 months from prior SRS and a prescription dose ≥ 18 Gy. Alternatives such as HFSRS, laser interstitial thermal therapy, or resection with adjuvant radiation should be considered for recurrent brain metastases > 2 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny K Sneed
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jason W Chan
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Lijun Ma
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Philip V Theodosopoulos
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Shannon E Fogh
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jean L Nakamura
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Lauren Boreta
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - David R Raleigh
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco.,3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Benjamin P Ziemer
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Olivier Morin
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Shawn L Hervey-Jumper
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Michael W McDermott
- 4Division of Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Katzendobler S, Do A, Weller J, Rejeski K, Dorostkar MM, Albert NL, Forbrig R, Niyazi M, Egensperger R, Tonn JC, Baumgarten LV, Quach S, Thon N. The value of stereotactic biopsy of primary and recurrent brain metastases in the era of precision medicine. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1014711. [PMID: 36605448 PMCID: PMC9808072 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1014711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases (BM) represent the most frequent intracranial tumors with increasing incidence. Many primary tumors are currently treated in protocols that incorporate targeted therapies either upfront or for progressive metastatic disease. Hence, molecular markers are gaining increasing importance in the diagnostic framework of BM. In cases with diagnostic uncertainty, both in newly diagnosed or recurrent BM, stereotactic biopsy serves as an alternative to microsurgical resection particularly whenever resection is not deemed to be safe or feasible. This retrospective study aimed to analyze both diagnostic yield and safety of an image-guided frame based stereotactic biopsy technique (STX). Material and methods Our institutional neurosurgical data base was searched for any surgical procedure for suspected brain metastases between January 2016 and March 2021. Of these, only patients with STX were included. Clinical parameters, procedural complications, and tissue histology and concomitant molecular signature were assessed. Results Overall, 467 patients were identified including 234 (50%) with STX. Median age at biopsy was 64 years (range 29 - 87 years). MRI was used for frame-based trajectory planning in every case with additional PET-guidance in 38 cases (16%). In total, serial tumor probes provided a definite diagnosis in 230 procedures (98%). In 4 cases (1.7%), the pathological tissue did not allow a definitive neuropathological diagnosis. 24 cases had to be excluded due to non-metastatic histology, leaving 206 cases for further analyses. 114 patients (49%) exhibited newly diagnosed BM, while 46 patients (20%) displayed progressive BM. Pseudoprogression was seen in 46 patients, a median of 12 months after prior therapy. Pseudoprogression was always confirmed by clinical course. Metastatic tissue was found most frequently from lung cancer (40%), followed by breast cancer (9%), and malignant melanoma (7%). Other entities included gastrointestinal cancer, squamous cell cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and thyroid cancer, respectively. In 9 cases (4%), the tumor origin could not be identified (cancer of unknown primary). Molecular genetic analyses were successful in 137 out of 144 analyzed cases (95%). Additional next-generation sequencing revealed conclusive results in 12/18 (67%) cases. Relevant peri-procedural complications were observed in 5 cases (2.4%), which were all transient. No permanent morbidity or mortality was noted. Conclusion In patients with BM, frame-based stereotactic biopsy constitutes a safe procedure with a high diagnostic yield. Importantly, this extended to discerning pseudoprogression from tumor relapse after prior therapy. Thus, comprehensive molecular characterization based on minimal-invasive stereotactic biopsies lays the foundation for precision medicine approaches in the treatment of primary and recurrent BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Katzendobler
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Do
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Weller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Rejeski
- Department of Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mario M. Dorostkar
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Forbrig
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rupert Egensperger
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Louisa v. Baumgarten
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Quach
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,*Correspondence: Niklas Thon,
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment of Radionecrosis in Malignant Gliomas and Cerebral Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246264. [PMID: 36551750 PMCID: PMC9777318 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation necrosis represents a potentially devastating complication after radiation therapy in brain tumors. The establishment of the diagnosis and especially the differentiation from progression and pseudoprogression with its therapeutic implications requires interdisciplinary consent and monitoring. Herein, we want to provide an overview of the diagnostic modalities, therapeutic possibilities and an outlook on future developments to tackle this challenging topic. The aim of this report is to provide an overview of the current morphological, functional, metabolic and evolving imaging tools described in the literature in order to (I) identify the best criteria to distinguish radionecrosis from tumor recurrence after the radio-oncological treatment of malignant gliomas and cerebral metastases, (II) analyze the therapeutic possibilities and (III) give an outlook on future developments to tackle this challenging topic. Additionally, we provide the experience of a tertiary tumor center with this important issue in neuro-oncology and provide an institutional pathway dealing with this problem.
Collapse
|
48
|
Direct dosimetric comparison of linear accelerator vs. Gamma Knife fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain tumors. Med Dosim 2022; 48:31-36. [PMID: 36503990 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to directly compare the plan quality of Gamma Knife (GK) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden)- vs linear accelerator (LINAC)-based delivery techniques for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain metastases. Eighteen patients with clinical target volumes (CTVs) larger than 9.5 cc were selected to generate comparative plans for the prescription dose of 9 Gy × 3 fractions, utilizing the Eclipse (Varian, Palo Alto, US) vs Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) treatment planning systems (TPS). Each GK plan was first developed using LGP's automatic planning, followed by manual adjustments/refinements. The same MRI and structures, including CTVs and organs at risk, were then DICOM-transferred to the Eclipse TPS. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Dynamic Conformal Arc (DCA) plans for a Truebeam, with high-definition multi-leaf collimators (MLCs), were developed on these MR images and structures using a single isocenter and 3 non-coplanar arcs. No planning target volume (PTV) margins were added, and no heterogeneity correction was used for either TPS. GK plans were prescribed to the 50% isodose line, and Eclipse VMAT and DCA plans allowed a maximum dose up to 170% and ∼125%, respectively. Gradient index (GI), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), V20GyRind, and V4GyRind of all 3 techniques were calculated and compared. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the statistical significance of the differences of these planning indices for the 3 planning techniques. A total of eighteen treatment targets were analyzed. Median CTV volume was 14.4 cc (range 9.5 cc - 55.9 cc). Mean ± standard deviation of PCI were 0.85 ± 0.03, 0.90 ± 0.03, and 0.72 ± 0.11 for GK, VMAT and DCA plans, respectively. They were respectively 2.64 ± 0.17, 2.46 ± 0.18, and 2.83 ± 0.48 for GI; 15.33 ± 8.45 cc, 10.47 ± 4.32 cc and 23.51 ± 16 cc for V20GyRind; and 316.28 ± 138.35 cc, 317.81 ± 108.21 cc, and 394.85 ± 142.16 cc for V4GyRind. The differences were statistically significant with p < 0.01 for all indices, except for V4GyRind (p > 0.129). In conclusion, a direct dosimetric comparison using the same MRI scan and contours was performed to evaluate the plan quality of various fSRT delivery techniques for CTV > 9.5 cc. LINAC VMAT plans provided the best dosimetric outcome in regard to PCI, GI, and V20GyRind. GK outcomes were similar to LINAC VMAT plans while LINAC DCA outcomes were significantly worse. Even though GK has a smaller physical penumbra, LINAC VMAT outperformed GK in this study due to enhanced penumbra sharpening and better beam optimization.
Collapse
|
49
|
Performance sensitivity analysis of brain metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery outcome prediction using MRI radiomics. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20975. [PMID: 36471160 PMCID: PMC9722896 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25389-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have used T1w contrast-enhanced (T1w-CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features and machine learning to predict post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain metastasis (BM) progression, but have not examined the effects of combining clinical and radiomic features, BM primary cancer, BM volume effects, and using multiple scanner models. To investigate these effects, a dataset of n = 123 BMs from 99 SRS patients with 12 clinical features, 107 pre-treatment T1w-CE radiomic features, and BM progression determined by follow-up MRI was used with a random decision forest model and 250 bootstrapped repetitions. Repeat experiments assessed the relative accuracy across primary cancer sites, BM volume groups, and scanner model pairings. Correction for accuracy imbalances across volume groups was investigated by removing volume-correlated features. We found that using clinical and radiomic features together produced the most accurate model with a bootstrap-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77. Accuracy also varied by primary cancer site, BM volume, and scanner model pairings. The effect of BM volume was eliminated by removing features at a volume-correlation coefficient threshold of 0.25. These results show that feature type, primary cancer, volume, and scanner model are all critical factors in the accuracy of radiomics-based prognostic models for BM SRS that must be characterised and controlled for before clinical translation.
Collapse
|
50
|
Grishchuk D, Dimitriadis A, Sahgal A, De Salles A, Fariselli L, Kotecha R, Levivier M, Ma L, Pollock BE, Regis J, Sheehan J, Suh J, Yomo S, Paddick I. ISRS Technical Guidelines for Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Treatment of Small Brain Metastases (≤1 cm in Diameter). Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 13:183-194. [PMID: 36435388 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this literature review was to develop International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) consensus technical guidelines for the treatment of small, ≤1 cm in maximal diameter, intracranial metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery. Although different stereotactic radiosurgery technologies are available, most of them have similar treatment workflows and common technical challenges that are described. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic review of the literature published between 2009 and 2020 was performed in Pubmed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology. The search terms were limited to those related to radiosurgery of brain metastases and to publications in the English language. RESULTS From 484 collected abstract 37 articles were included into the detailed review and bibliographic analysis. An additional 44 papers were identified as relevant from a search of the references. The 81 papers, including additional 7 international guidelines, were deemed relevant to at least one of five areas that were considered paramount for this report. These areas of technical focus have been employed to structure these guidelines: imaging specifications, target volume delineation and localization practices, use of margins, treatment planning techniques, and patient positioning. CONCLUSION This systematic review has demonstrated that Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for small (1 cm) brain metastases can be safely performed on both Gamma Knife (GK) and CyberKnife (CK) as well as on modern LINACs, specifically tailored for radiosurgical procedures, However, considerable expertise and resources are required for a program based on the latest evidence for best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Grishchuk
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Alexis Dimitriadis
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antonio De Salles
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Laura Fariselli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano, Unita di Radiotherapia, Milan, Italy
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Marc Levivier
- Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jean Regis
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, La Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Ian Paddick
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|