Normative Data for Brainstem Structures, the Midbrain-to-Pons Ratio, and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index

Contribution of MRI for the Early Diagnosis of Parkinsonism in Patients with Diagnostic Uncertainty

BACKGROUND

International clinical criteria are the reference for the diagnosis of degenerative parkinsonism in clinical research, but they may lack sensitivity and specificity in the early stages.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis, through visual reading or machine-learning approaches, improves diagnostic accuracy compared with clinical diagnosis at an early stage in patients referred for suspected degenerative parkinsonism.

MATERIALS

Patients with initial diagnostic uncertainty between Parkinson's disease (PD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and multisystem atrophy (MSA), with brain MRI performed at the initial visit (V1) and available 2-year follow-up (V2), were included. We evaluated the accuracy of the diagnosis established based on: (1) the international clinical diagnostic criteria for PD, PSP, and MSA at V1 ("Clin1"); (2) MRI visual reading blinded to the clinical diagnosis ("MRI"); (3) both MRI visual reading and clinical criteria at V1 ("MRI and Clin1"), and (4) a machine-learning algorithm ("Algorithm"). The gold standard diagnosis was established by expert consensus after a 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

We recruited 113 patients (53 with PD, 31 with PSP, and 29 with MSA). Considering the whole population, compared with clinical criteria at the initial visit ("Clin1": balanced accuracy, 66.2%), MRI visual reading showed a diagnostic gain of 14.3% ("MRI": 80.5%; P = 0.01), increasing to 19.2% when combined with the clinical diagnosis at the initial visit ("MRI and Clin1": 85.4%; P < 0.0001). The algorithm achieved a diagnostic gain of 9.9% ("Algorithm": 76.1%; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the use of MRI analysis, whether by visual reading or machine-learning methods, for early differentiation of parkinsonism. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Comparison of mean diffusivity, R2* relaxation rate and morphometric biomarkers for the clinical differentiation of parkinsonism

INTRODUCTION

Quantitative biomarkers for clinical differentiation of parkinsonian syndromes are still lacking. Our aim was to evaluate the value of combining clinically feasible manual measurements of R2* relaxation rates and mean diffusivity (MD) in subcortical regions and brainstem morphometric measurements to improve the discrimination of parkinsonian syndromes.

METHODS

Twenty-two healthy controls (HC), 25 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), 19 with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and 27 with multiple system atrophy (MSA, 21 with the parkinsonian variant -MSAp, 6 with the cerebellar variant -MSAc) were recruited. R2*, MD measurements and morphometric biomarkers including the midbrain to pons area ratio and the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) were compared between groups and their diagnostic performances were assessed.

RESULTS

Morphometric biomarkers discriminated better patients with PSP (ratio: AUC 0.89, MRPI: AUC 0.89) and MSAc (ratio: AUC 0.82, MRPI: AUC 0.75) from other groups. R2* and MD measurements in the posterior putamen performed better in separating patients with MSAp from PD (R2*: AUC 0.89; MD: AUC 0.89). For the three-class classification "MSA vs PD vs PSP", the combination of MD and R2* measurements in the posterior putamen with morphometric biomarkers (AUC: 0.841) outperformed each marker separately. At the individual-level, there were seven discordances between imaging-based prediction and clinical diagnosis involving MSA. Using the new Movement Disorder Society criteria for the diagnosis of MSA, three of these seven patients were clinically reclassified as predicted by quantitative imaging.

CONCLUSION

Combining R2* and MD measurements in the posterior putamen with morphometric biomarkers improves the discrimination of parkinsonism.

Magnetic Resonance Planimetry in the Differential Diagnosis between Parkinson’s Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

The clinical differential diagnosis between Parkinson’s disease (PD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is often challenging. The description of milder PSP phenotypes strongly resembling PD, such as PSP-Parkinsonism, further increased the diagnostic challenge and the need for reliable neuroimaging biomarkers to enhance the diagnostic certainty. This review aims to summarize the contribution of a relatively simple and widely available imaging technique such as MR planimetry in the differential diagnosis between PD and PSP, focusing on the recent advancements in this field. The development of accurate MR planimetric biomarkers, together with the implementation of automated algorithms, led to robust and objective measures for the differential diagnosis of PSP and PD at the individual level. Evidence from longitudinal studies also suggests a role of MR planimetry in predicting the development of the PSP clinical signs, allowing to identify PSP patients before they meet diagnostic criteria when their clinical phenotype can be indistinguishable from PD. Finally, promising evidence exists on the possible association between MR planimetric measures and the underlying pathology, with important implications for trials with new disease-modifying target therapies.