Genetics Education in Nurse Residency Programs: A Natural Fit

Genomes for Nurses: Understanding and Overcoming Barriers to Nurses Utilizing Genomics

Background: Genomic testing is an increasingly important technology within pediatric oncology that aids in cancer diagnosis, provides prognostic information, identifies therapeutic targets, and reveals underlying cancer predisposition. However, nurses lack basic knowledge of genomics and have limited self-assurance in using genomic information in their daily practice. This single-institution project was carried out at an academic pediatric cancer hospital in the United States with the aim to explore the barriers to achieving genomics literacy for pediatric oncology nurses. Method: This project assessed barriers to genomic education and preferences for receiving genomics education among pediatric oncology nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. An electronic survey with demographic questions and 15 genetics-focused questions was developed. The final survey instrument consisted of nine sections and was pilot-tested prior to administration. Data were analyzed using a ranking strategy, and five focus groups were conducted to capture more-nuanced information. The focus group sessions lasted 40 min to 1 hour and were recorded and transcribed. Results: Over 50% of respondents were uncomfortable with or felt unprepared to answer questions from patients and/or family members about genomics. This unease ranked as the top barrier to using genomic information in clinical practice. Discussion: These results reveal that most nurses require additional education to facilitate an understanding of genomics. This project lays the foundation to guide the development of a pediatric cancer genomics curriculum, which will enable the incorporation of genomics into nursing practice.

Difficulties in providing genetic consultations by public health nurses in Japan

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to identify the topics that Japanese public health nurses (PHNs) find difficult during genetic consultations and to identify the relationships between these difficulties and PHNs' genetic education.

METHODS

We conducted a mail survey delivered to PHNs employed by local Japanese governmental agencies in the Tokyo metropolitan area, between July and October 2015. The self-administered questionnaire queried the (1) experience with genetic consultation, (2) perceived difficulties in genetic consultation, (3) genetics education background, and (4) demographics. The association between the perceived difficulties in genetic consultations and the genetics education opportunities was examined using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 907 mailed surveys, 536 PHNs responded (59.1% response rate). Most of the respondents (89.7%) had previously conducted genetic consultations. The majority of respondents (72.7%) had partaken in consultations regarding a possible hereditary disorder in the client or their families, and of those, 76.6% perceived difficulties during the genetic consultation. Respondents who had previously studied decision-making support for genetic testing were significantly less likely to perceive difficulties in genetic consultations on prenatal diagnosis (OR = 0.04, 95% CI [0.00-0.73]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PHNs receive training in genetic consultation, which can be integrated into everyday practice.