Prevalence, progression, and outcomes of diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy in Indian scenario

Progression of diabetic retinopathy in women with pregestational diabetes during pregnancy and postpartum

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) may worsen during pregnancy, but its course in the postpartum remains poorly understood. Understanding the natural history of DR during and after pregnancy can help determine when sight-threatening DR treatment should be administered.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal cohort study recruited pregnant women with pre-existing type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes from two tertiary Diabetes Antenatal Clinics in Melbourne, Australia. Eye examination results in early pregnancy, late pregnancy, and up to 12-months postpartum were compared to determine DR changes. Two-field fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography scans were used to assess DR severity.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 (61.4%) women had at least two eye examinations during the observation period. Mean age was 33.5 years (range 19-51); 54 women (51.4%) had T1D; 63% had HbA1c <7% in early pregnancy. DR progression rate was 23.8% (95% CI 16.4-32.6). Having T1D (RR 4.96, 95% CI 1.83-13.46), pre-existing DR in either eye (RR 4.54, 95% CI 2.39-8.61), and elevated systolic blood pressure (adjusted RR 2.49, 95% CI 1.10-5.66) were associated with increased risk of progression. Sight-threatening progression was observed in 9.5% of women. Among the 19 eyes with progression during pregnancy, 15 eyes remained stable, three eyes progressed, and only one eye regressed in the postpartum.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 1 in 4 women had DR progression from conception through to 12-months postpartum; almost half of these developing sight-threatening disease. DR progression occurring during pregnancy was found to predominantly remain unchanged, or worsen, after delivery, with very few eyes spontaneously improving postpartum.

Update on diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy

Diabetes mellitus (DM) leads to several vascular and neurological complications, including diabetic retinopathy (DR). As the population ages, health problems in certain groups, including children and pregnant women, are drawing more and more attention. Pregnancy is one of the independent risk factors for the development and progression of DR. Pregnancy-induced changes may contribute to or worsen DR, which can cause a tremendous burden on public health. It is essential for pregnant women with DR and their offspring to minimize the risk of vision loss from DR in this population and adverse outcomes by understanding the development and processes behind this process. Thus, we have updated the recent situation of epidemiology, evolution characteristics, risk factors, pathophysiology, pregnancy outcomes for a better understanding of the latest status of DR, helping to improve maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes, and promoting health for women with DR.

Risk factors for the development or progression of diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy: Meta‐analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness in the working-age population, and it increases in severity during pregnancy.

METHODS

Systematic review of literature from PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science using keywords 'diabetic retinopathy' and 'pregnancy' and 'progression' from inception to 2021 was completed. Included studies were (1) peer-reviewed observational studies addressing progression/development of DR in pregnancy, (2) provided the number of diabetic patients that developed/progressed in DR during pregnancy, and (3) included differential data on variables between progression and non-progression groups. This was applied by two independent researchers and referred to a third researcher as necessary. Twenty-seven of the original 138 studies met this criterion. Data were pooled and analysed using fixed-effects in meta-analysis.

RESULTS

From 27 studies, 2537 patients were included. Pre-eclampsia [Risk Ratio (RR) 2.62 (95% CI = 1.72, 4.00)] and hypertension treatment during pregnancy [RR 2.74 (95% CI = 1.72, 4.00)] were significantly associated with the development/progression of DR. HbA1c at baseline [MD 0.82 (95% CI = 0.59, 1.06)], duration of diabetes [mean difference (MD) 5.97 (95% CI = 5.38, 6.57)], and diastolic blood pressure at baseline [MD 3.29 (95% CI = 0.46, 6.12)] were all significantly higher in the progression group while only mean birth weight [MD -0.17 (95% CI = -0.31, -0.03)] was significantly higher in the non-progression group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study fills a gap in the literature and provide physicians with more information on the risk factors associated with the progression of DR in pregnancy and how to counsel this vulnerable patient population appropriately.

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in women with pregestational diabetes during pregnancy and the postpartum

BACKGROUND

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) may be affected by pregnancy. The majority of prevalence data regarding DR in pregnancy predate the advent of contemporary guidelines for diabetes management during pregnancy. This study reports DR prevalence and associated risk factors in women with pregestational diabetes during pregnancy and the postpartum in Australia.

METHODS

A total of 172 pregnant women with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes diagnosed pre-pregnancy were prospectively recruited from two obstetrics hospitals in Melbourne (November 2017-March 2020). Eye examinations were scheduled in each trimester, at 3-, 6-, and 12-months postpartum. DR severity was graded from two-field fundus photographs by an independent grader utilising the Airlie House Classification. Sight-threatening DR (STDR) was defined as the presence of diabetic macular oedema or proliferative DR.

RESULTS

Overall, 146 (84.9%) women had at least one eye examination during pregnancy. The mean age was 33.8 years (range 19-51), median diabetes duration was 7.0 years (IQR 3.0-17.0), 71 women (48.6%) had T1DM. DR and STDR prevalence during pregnancy per 100 eyes was 24.3 (95% CI 19.7-29.6) and 9.0 (95% CI 6.1-12.9); while prevalence in the postpartum was 22.2 (95% CI 16.5-29.3) and 10.0 (95% CI 5.4-17.9), respectively. T1DM, longer diabetes duration, higher HbA1c in early pregnancy, and pre-existing nephropathy were significant risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of DR in pregnant women was similar to the non-pregnant diabetic population in Australia. One in nine participants had STDR during pregnancy and the postpartum, highlighting the need to optimise DR management guidelines in pregnancy given the significant risk of vision loss.

Prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy in pregnant women with diabetes-time to individualize photo screening frequency

AIMS

To evaluate the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy including macular oedema in pregnant women with diabetes and to identify women in whom the frequency of retinal screening can be reduced to minimize the burden of health care visits.

METHODS

A cohort study of 348 women with pre-existing diabetes were routinely screened with retinal photo in early (12 weeks) and late pregnancy (27 weeks). Diabetic retinopathy was classified in five stages in accordance with National Danish Guidelines based on the eye with the highest retinopathy level. Sight-threatening retinopathy was defined as the presence of proliferative retinopathy and/or clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO).

RESULTS

Retinopathy was present in 52% (116/223) vs. 14% (17/125), with sight-threatening retinopathy in 16% (35/223) vs. 6% (7/125) of women with type 1 and type 2, respectively. Women without retinopathy in early and late pregnancy were characterized by shorter diabetes duration (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.008) and predominance of type 2 diabetes. Amongst the 50% (175/348) of the cohort having no retinopathy in early pregnancy and HbA1c<53 mmol/mol (7.0%), none developed sight-threatening retinopathy and 94% (165/175) remained without any retinopathy during pregnancy. Development of sight-threatening retinopathy was mainly observed in women with retinopathy in early pregnancy. Treatment for sight-threatening retinopathy was given to a minority (2.7 and 2.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Good glycaemic control and no retinopathy was seen in a large proportion of women in early pregnancy and none of these women developed sight-threatening retinopathy. The frequency of retinal screening can probably be safely reduced during pregnancy in these women.

Global Estimates of Diabetic Retinopathy Prevalence and Progression in Pregnant Women With Preexisting Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) may be worsened by pregnancy in pregnant women with preexisting type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Conflicting findings from previous studies have resulted in inconsistencies in guidelines regarding DR management in pregnancy. Global estimates of DR prevalence and progression in pregnancy are therefore required to provide clearer information about the overall true burden of DR in this population.

Objective

To estimate the prevalence of DR and its progression rate in pregnant women with preexisting T1D or T2D diagnosed before pregnancy.

Data Sources

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted from November 27, 2018, to June 29, 2021, a systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/Ovid, Embase/Ovid, and Scopus databases to identify English-language articles that were published from inception through October 2020.

Study Selection

Observational studies that reported on DR and its changes in pregnant women with preexisting T1D and T2D.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data from each included study. Data were pooled using a random-effects model with the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. This study followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Prevalence of any DR, proliferative DR (PDR), and DR progression rates.

Results

A total of 18 observational studies involving 1464 pregnant women with T1D and 262 pregnant women with T2D were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of any DR and PDR in early pregnancy was 52.3 (95% CI, 41.9-62.6) and 6.1 (95% CI, 3.1-9.8) per 100 pregnancies, respectively. The pooled progression rate per 100 pregnancies for new DR development was 15.0 (95% CI, 9.9-20.8), worsened nonproliferative DR was 31.0 (95% CI, 23.2-39.2), progression from nonproliferative DR to PDR was 6.3 (95% CI, 3.3-10.0), and worsened PDR was 37.0 (95% CI, 21.2-54.0). DR progression rates per 100 pregnancies were similar between the T1D and T2D groups, except for the development of new DR (T1D groups: 15.8; 95% CI, 10.5-21.9; T2D groups: 9.0; 95% CI, 4.9-14.8). A global trend toward a lower DR progression rate was observed after the 1989 St Vincent Declaration.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that women with T1D and T2D had a similar risk of DR progression during pregnancy. Despite improvements in the management of diabetes and diabetes during pregnancy, DR prevalence and progression in pregnant women with diabetes remains higher than the nonpregnant population with diabetes, highlighting the need to improve DR management in pregnancy.

Pregnancy and the eye

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to summarize common eye changes that may occur during pregnancy, and how pregnancy may affect preexisting eye conditions such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Challenges and complexities surrounding the treatment of these eye conditions during pregnancy are also highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Refractive changes are common and may persist in the postpartum in patients with keratoconus. Although new medical and surgical glaucoma treatments are available, their safety in pregnancy is unknown. Limited use of topical and systemic glaucoma therapies is recommended, with a preference for selective laser trabeculoplasty as first line treatment in appropriate cases. The impact of pregnancy on diabetic retinopathy remains unclear. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents are first-line treatment for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy, their effect on the developing foetus remains unknown and are therefore best avoided in the first and second trimesters. Noninfectious uveitis tends to become less active during pregnancy, allowing the potential tapering of systemic therapy and the use of local topical or injected corticosteroid treatment for active disease as required.

SUMMARY

Significant changes can occur to the eye during pregnancy, wherein the optimal treatment for many ocular conditions remains uncertain, highlighting the need for further research to develop clear recommendations that best balance the need to preserve the mother's sight, and the health of the developing foetus. The need for preconception planning, and collaborative multidisciplinary care between the obstetrician, physician, ophthalmologist and paediatrician is paramount.

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medications during pregnancy: current perspective

PURPOSE

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications are widely used for treatment of a number of vitreoretinal disorders. However, the evidence for their effect on fetal and maternal health during pregnancy is very limited. The goal of this article is to accumulate evidence for the indications of anti-VEGF medications during pregnancy and their effects on maternal and fetal health.

METHODS

Review of literature regarding anti-VEGF administration during pregnancy and using PubMed database without language or date limit.

RESULTS

The main indications for treatment with intravitreal anti-VEGF medications include choroidal neovascularization (CNV) followed by retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) and complications of diabetes such as neovascular glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). Among anti-VEGF medications, only ranibizumab and bevacizumab have been used during pregnancy with latter by far more than the former.

CONCLUSION

Women of childbearing age should be consulted regarding the potential adverse effects of anti-VEGF medications on fetal health and the risk of early pregnancy loss. They should be strongly encouraged to use appropriate contraceptive methods during treatment. A timely obstetrics consultation may help in this situation. Attempt for pregnancy should be withheld for at least 3 months following last injection of ranibizumab and aflibercept, and for at least 6 months following last injection of bevacizumab.

Type 2 Diabetes in Pregnancy

Hyperglycemia is common during pregnancy, involving multisystem adaptations. Pregnancy-induced metabolic changes increase insulin resistance. Pregnancy-induced insulin resistance adds to preexisting insulin resistance. Preexisting pancreatic β-cell defect compromises the ability to enhance insulin secretion, leading to hyperglycemia. Women with type 2 DM have similar rates of major congenital malformations, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality, but an even higher risk of perinatal mortality. In utero type 2 DM exposure confers greater risk and reduces time to development of type 2 DM in offspring. Preconception care to improve metabolic control in women with type 2 diabetes is critical.

Interleukin-6 and Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is produced by a variety of cells involved in inflammation and acts as local intensification signals in pathological processes associated with chronic eye inflammation. This meta-analysis was performed to provide a better understanding of the relationship between IL-6 and diabetic retinopathy.

METHODS

The study was started with systematic search for literatures by using the PubMed, Web of Science and Embase online databases. The standard mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were was included and then pooled with a random effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty-one articles, containing1099 DR patients and 1010 controls, were included in this meta-analysis. The level of IL-6 in the DR group was found to be higher than that in the control group (SMD: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.53-2.70, p < 0.00001).Obvious heterogeneity existed between the studies (p < 0.00001, I² = 96%). So a subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed. Removing the sensitivity studies, the stability of the overall treatment effect was good. Subgroup analysis showed that the levels of IL-6 in case group were observed to be higher than those in the control group; and the IL-6 levels in the proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) group were also higher than those in the non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) group. (SMD: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.26-1.31, p=  0.003) Conclusion: The results from this current meta-analysis indicated that increased level of IL-6 generally exist in DR patients. And it may associated with the severity of DR. However, large-scale and high-quality studies in future are required to confirm the present findings.

Tumor necrosis factor-α and diabetic retinopathy: Review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is produced by multinuclear giant cells and acts as local intensification signals in pathological processes associated with chronic eye inflammation. This meta-analysis was performed to provide a better understanding of the relationship between TNF-α and diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHOD

Online electric databases were searched to retrieve all relevant articles published before October 2017. The standard mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were included and then pooled with a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 16 articles with 1286 participants were included in this meta-analysis. No difference in the level of TNF-α was found between DR patients and healthy controls (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI = -0.09 to 0.68, P = 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that with respect to the level of TNF-α, the association was significant for studies conducted in Europe (SMD: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.11-1.02, P = 0.01), patients with type 1 DM (SMD: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.09-2.04, P = 0.03), studies based on serum samples (SMD: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.12-1.02, P = 0.01) and studies with a sample size >50 (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.03-0.75, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The results this meta-analysis indicated that the level of TNF-α in DR patients was significantly different from that in the healthy controls, so TNF-α represents a candidate biomarker for DR.