One-Year Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine a Cationic Emulsion in the Treatment of Severe Dry Eye Disease

Improvement in signs and symptoms of severe dry eye disease after dual therapy with high-potency steroids and 0.05% cyclosporine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining 0.05% cyclosporine A (CsA) with high-potency steroids for treating severe dry eye disease (DED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective comparative case series included 93 patients treated with 0.05% CsA for severe DED. Among them, we included data from 54 eyes of 27 patients who received high-potency steroids in the study group and from 132 eyes of 66 patients who did not receive high-potency steroids in the control group. Data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medications and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded. The primary outcomes were changes in symptom and sign scores. The ocular surface disease index was used as the symptom score, whereas tear break-up time, Schirmer I test without anaesthesia, ocular surface staining scores and presence of meibomian gland dysfunction were considered as sign scores. Repeated one-way ANOVA and generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate differences.

RESULTS

In the control group, symptom scores decreased from 1 to 2 months and from 2 to 3 months after treatment (p = .002 and .049). In the high-potency steroid group, symptom scores improved during these intervals (p = .003 and .005). The sign score in the control group remained unchanged (all p > .05), while the high-potency steroid group exhibited progressive improvement in sign scores (all p < .05). The high-potency steroid group had more favourable symptom (p = .035) and sign (p < .001) scores than did the control group. However, multiple systemic diseases were associated with poor symptom (p = .025) and sign (p = .014) scores. The risks for glaucoma and cataract formation were similar between the two groups (all p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual therapy combining high-potency steroids and 0.05% CsA significantly improved the signs and symptoms of severe DED compared with 0.05% CsA monotherapy, without severe complications.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Perfluorohexyloctane Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Patients With Dry Eye Disease: The KALAHARI Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of perfluorohexyloctane (PFHO) ophthalmic drop (formerly NOV03) for treatment of dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

KALAHARI was a phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label extension study in patients aged 18 years or older with DED associated with Meibomian gland dysfunction who completed the randomized, double-masked, hypotonic saline-controlled GOBI study. Patients instilled 1 drop of PFHO (MIEBO, Bausch + Lomb) 4 times daily in both eyes for 52 weeks. Safety assessments included adverse events, best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure, and dilated fundoscopy. Efficacy end points included change from GOBI study baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining and eye dryness score (0-100 visual analog scale).

RESULTS

Overall, 208 patients from GOBI (PFHO [n = 97]; saline [n = 111]) were rolled over into KALAHARI. Twenty-nine patients (13.9%) had ≥1 ocular adverse event, with most being mild or moderate in severity; the most common ocular adverse events were vitreous detachment (1.9%), allergic conjunctivitis (1.4%), blurred vision (1.4%), and increased lacrimation (1.4%). Other safety end points were unremarkable. For patients continuing PFHO from GOBI, improvements in total corneal fluorescein staining and visual analog scale dryness scores observed in GOBI were maintained throughout KALAHARI. Patients treated with saline in GOBI and switched to PFHO in KALAHARI showed improvements in total corneal fluorescein staining and visual analog scale scores by week 4 that were maintained for the rest of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

PFHO was safe and well tolerated and maintained efficacy for improving signs and symptoms of DED in this year-long study of patients with DED associated with Meibomian gland dysfunction.

Short-Term Efficacy of Ophthalmic Cyclosporine: A 0.1% Cationic Emulsion in Dry Eye Patients Assessed Under Controlled Environment

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the short-term efficacy of cyclosporine A (CsA)-0.1% cationic emulsion (CE) in patients with dry eye disease (DED) and mitigation of the inflammatory flares triggered by desiccating stress environments.

METHODS

A single-center non-randomized clinical trial was performed at a tertiary care setting. Twenty patients with DED treated with CsA 0.1% CE were exposed to a normal controlled environment (NCE) (23 °C, 50% relative humidity) and an adverse controlled environment (ACE) (23 °C, 10% relative humidity, 0.43 m/s localized airflow) during baseline and the 1- and 3-month visits. Patients underwent the following evaluations: conjunctival hyperemia and staining, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) using the Oxford and Cornea and Contact Lens Research Unit (CCLRU) scale, meibomian gland (MG) secretion quality, Dry Eye Questionnaire-5, Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE II), and Change in Dry Eye Symptoms Questionnaire. Multivariate models were adjusted for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen women and one man (mean age, 58.9 ± 12.3 years) completed the study. All symptom questionnaires, CFS, conjunctival hyperemia and staining, and MG secretion quality improved (p ≤ 0.003) with 1 month of treatment; improvements were maintained after 3 months (p ≤ 0.02), except for SANDE II (p ≥ 0.07). The CFS worsening (total CCLRU) after baseline ACE exposure (from 8.6 to 10.1) was higher, although not significant (p = 0.64), compared with 1 month (from 5.4 to 5.8) and 3 months (from 5.0 to 5.9) after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Topical CsA-0.1% CE improved DED signs and symptoms after 1 month of treatment under controlled environmental conditions. Future studies should confirm the benefit of CsA-0.1% CE in desiccating stress environments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04492878.

Recent Advances in Nanotechnology for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Dry eye disease (DED) incidence is continuously growing, positioning it to become an emergent health issue over the next few years. Several topical treatments are commonly used to treat DED; however, reports indicate that only a minor proportion of drug bioavailability is achieved by the majority of eye drops available on the market. In this context, enhancing drug ability to overcome ocular barriers and prolonging its residence time on the ocular surface represent a new challenge in the field of ocular carrier systems. Therefore, research has focused on the development of multi-functional nanosystems, such as nanoemulsions, liposomes, dendrimers, hydrogels, and other nanosized carriers. These systems are designed to improve topical drug bioavailability and efficacy and, at the same time, require fewer daily administrations, with potentially reduced side effects. This review summarizes the different nanotechnologies developed, their role in DED, and the nanotechnology-based eyedrops currently approved for DED treatment.

[Corneal wound healing-Pharmacological treatment]

Physiological wound healing of the cornea is a complex process and involves numerous multifactorial tissue processes. A proper wound healing, especially without the formation of light-scattering scars, is essential to preserve the integrity and function of the cornea. Misdirected wound healing is of vast clinical relevance as it can lead to corneal fibrosis and the loss of optical transparency with subsequent reduction of visual acuity, up to blindness. In addition to the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms, the knowledge of therapeutic concepts and options for treating corneal wound healing disorders and fibrosis is essential to counteract a permanent damage of the cornea as early as possible. Nowadays, various pharmacological and surgical options are available for treatment. The decision, appropriate selection and indication for the optimal treatment depend primarily on the genesis and clinical appearance of the corneal wound, fibrosis or scar. The treatment of wound healing disorders ranges from the use of topical therapy and supportive measures up to tissue replacement procedures. As long as the mechanical stability of the cornea is intact and wound healing processes are still ongoing, a pharmacological modulation is reasonable, which is discussed in this article.

NOVATIVE: A Phase II/III, Multicenter, Double-masked, Randomized Study of Cyclosporine A 0.05% and 0.1% Ophthalmic Cationic Emulsion Versus Vehicle in Patients with Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of cyclosporine A cationic emulsion (CsA-CE) in patients ≥4 years of age with moderate-to-severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).

METHODS

This Phase II/III, multicenter, double-masked, dose-ranging study had 2 treatment periods: a 4-week, randomized, vehicle-controlled period in which patients received 0.05% CsA-CE, 0.1% CsA-CE, or vehicle eye drops 4 times daily (period 1) and a 3-month period in which patients received 0.05% CsA-CE or 0.1% CsA-CE 2 or 4 times daily (period 2). The primary efficacy end point was rating of subjective symptoms at day 28 in period 1 per the BenEzra scale.

FINDINGS

All groups showed improvement in subjective VKC symptoms at day 28, without a statistically significant difference between 0.05% or 0.1% CsA-CE vs vehicle. Both CsA-CE doses produced statistically significant improvements in corneal fluorescein staining scores vs vehicle at day 28; improvements were evident as early as week 1 and continued through month 1. Progressive reduction in subjective itching was evident after week 1 and continued through month 1. Treatment for an additional 3 months further improved subjective symptoms and objective signs of VKC in both CsA-CE groups. Improvement was most notable with 0.1% CsA-CE in patients with severe keratitis. The safety and tolerability profile is favorable.

IMPLICATIONS

Although treatment with 0.05% and 0.1% CsA-CE showed clinical efficacy in alleviating keratitis and itching as early as week 1, with sustained benefit through 1 month, the primary efficacy end point was not met. These findings informed the design of the Phase III trial of 0.1% CsA-CE (Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis Study).

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT00328653.

Update on Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Although the ultimate goal of dry eye disease (DED) management is to restore the ocular surface and tear film homeostasis and address any accompanying symptoms, addressing this is not an easy task. Despite the wide range of current treatment modalities targeting multiple aspects of DED, the available DED management literature is quite heterogeneous, rendering evaluation or comparison of treatment outcomes hard or almost impossible. There is still a shortage of well-designed, large-scale, nonsponsored, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating long-term safety and efficacy of many targeted therapies individually or used in combination, in the treatment of identified subgroups of patients with DED. This review focuses on the treatment modalities in DED management and aims to reveal the current evidence available as deduced from the outcomes of RCTs.

Multi-Frequency RF Combined with Intense Pulsed Light Improves Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of multi-frequency RF and IPL + MGX combination for treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD).

Patients and Methods

Eligible subjects had signs and moderate-to-severe symptoms of DED (Dry Eye Disease) due to MGD. Subjects underwent 4 treatments at 2-week intervals. Each treatment consisted of intense pulsed light (IPL) followed by radiofrequency (RF) on the periocular skin, followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX). The main outcome measure was the quality of meibum in 15 meibomian glands along the lower eyelid, using the modified Meibomian Gland Score (mMGS). The main hypothesis was a reduction of mMGS between the baseline (BL) and the follow-up (FU). Other outcome measures, such as symptoms measured with the OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) questionnaire, meibography, non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) levels in tear samples were evaluated as well.

Results

31 subjects completed the FU. Between BL and FU, mMGS decreased from 30.4 (8.5) to 9.3 (9.5) (-69.3%, 95% CI: -55.6% to -82.9%, p<0.0001); OSDI decreased from 63.6 (17.2) to 25.0 (20.6) (-60.7%, 95% CI: -47.8% to -73.5%, p<0.0001); NIBUT did not change (p=0.92). An adjusted model with a historical control was constructed to allow the comparison of these subjects with those treated similarly with IPL+MGX (but without RF) in a different study. This analysis identified that the change in mMGS was larger when RF was included (-20.9 vs -18.3, adjusted p-value (p_adjusted) <0.05). The difference in OSDI change was not significant (-38.1 vs -25.5, p_adjusted = 0.196).

Conclusion

Combination of multi-frequency RF and IPL+MGX improves signs and symptoms of MGD. In comparison to a historical control, improvements were generally larger. A randomized controlled study comparing the combination of RF and IPL+MGX with IPL+MGX alone is required to further elaborate the relative contribution of RF.

Ciclosporin A Cationic Emulsion 0.1% for the Management of Dry Eye Disease: Facts That Matter for Eye-Care Providers

Dry eye disease (DED) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the ocular surface requiring long-term therapy. Severe forms of DED generally do not respond to tear substitutes alone or combined, and often require treatment with topical anti-inflammatory agents to break the vicious circle of inflammation. This review summarises data from randomised controlled trials and real-world evidence on the efficacy and safety of ciclosporin A 0.1% cationic emulsion (Ikervis®) for the management of DED. Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms were reported from as early as 4 weeks after treatment initiation, although it can take a few months to reach the full benefits. Treatment periods of up to 12 months provide sustained benefit to patients. In the most responsive patients, treatment discontinuation is possible with no further substantial relapse over 12 months in over 65% of patients. Transient local ocular effects are the most commonly reported adverse events.

Recent advances in drug treatments for dry eye disease

INTRODUCTION

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular condition with a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Conventional treatments include behavioral changes, tear substitutes, and anti-inflammatory agents; however, recent advances in the understanding of DED pathogenesis have opened the way to the development of novel treatment strategies able to target several pathways involved in the onset and persistence of DED.

AREAS COVERED

Literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus around the term 'dry eye disease' and others involving its pathophysiology and therapeutic strategy. The primary focus was on recent drugs approved by FDA or under investigation in phase 3 clinical trials. Google and ClinicalTrials.gov were used for obtaining information about the status of FDA approval and ongoing clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to its multifaced pathogenesis, DED management is often challenging, and patients' needs are frequently unmet. Recently, several novel treatments have been either FDA-approved or studied in late-phase trials. These novel drugs target-specific biological components of the ocular surface and reduce inflammation and ocular pain. Additionally, new drug delivery systems allow for increased bioavailability, improve effective dosing, and minimize ocular side effects. These advances in drug therapies show real promise for better management of DED patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Topical 0.1% Ciclosporin Cationic Emulsion Used on Label in Children with Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this short article is to report the clinical outcomes of topical 0.1% ciclosporin cationic emulsion (CsA-CE) used on label in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).

METHODS

In this prospective, non-comparative, observational study children affected by active severe VKC were treated for at least 12 months with topical 0.1% CsA-CE. The drug was instilled in both eyes 4 times daily. Data collected from medical charts for the baseline visit (T0) and 1-year follow-up visit (T1) included symptomatic score (0-15), clinical score (0-15), side effects, rescue therapy (need and total number of courses with 0.1% dexamethasone 4 times daily for 5 days), ocular complications and tolerability (visual analog scale [0-100]).

RESULTS

Data from 25 children (20 boys, 5 girls; mean [± standard deviation] age 8.40 ± 2.54 years) were included in the study. Of the 25 patients, 23 (92%) used 0.1% CsA-CE eye drops as per label recommendations, including four patients who had prematurely stopped using topical galenic CsA due to side effects. Symptomatic and clinical scores decreased significantly after treatment, with the mean symptomatic score decreasing from 9.76 ± 1.27 at T0 to 3.80 ± 1.08 at T1, and the mean clinical score decreasing from 9.20 ± 1.32 at T0 to 3.44 ± 1.00 at T1; both P < 0.0001). Five patients (20%) required at least one course of rescue medication (mean 3.4 ± 4.8 courses/year). No patients experienced ocular complications during the study, and treatment tolerability was very high (mean score 89.40 ± 5.46).

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirm that topical CsA-CE is an effective on-label option for children with VKC in the real-life setting. In our pediatric patient population, CsA-CE provided good clinical outcomes with a limited need for rescue medication, and it was well tolerated by almost all patients, including those who were intolerant to galenic formulations.

Role of topical and systemic immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease

Immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) is required not only to improve the symptoms and signs but also to prevent further progression of the disease and its sight-threatening sequelae. This immunomodulation can be achieved through topical and/or systemic medications, and the choice of one drug over the other is determined by the underlying systemic disease. These immunosuppressive agents require a minimum of 6-8 weeks to achieve their beneficial effect, and during this time, the patient is usually placed on topical corticosteroids. Antimetabolites such as methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil, along with calcineurin inhibitors, are commonly used as first-line medications. The latter have a pivotal role in immunomodulation since T cells contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of ocular surface inflammation in dry eye disease. Alkylating agents are largely limited to controlling acute exacerbations with pulse doses of cyclophosphamide. Biologic agents, such as rituximab, are particularly useful in patients with refractory disease. Each group of drugs has its own side-effect profiles and requires a stringent monitoring schedule that must be followed to prevent systemic morbidity. A customized combination of topical and systemic medications is usually required to achieve adequate control, and this review aims to help the clinician choose the most appropriate modality and monitoring regimen for a given case of ADDE.

Assessment of the efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of dry eye disease during COVID-19 pandemic

Objective: To assess the efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine A (CsA) cationic emulsion (CE) in the treatment of dry eye disease (DED) in terms of ocular surface disease index (OSDI). Methods: DED patients with corneal fluorescein staining grade (CFS) ≤ 3 on the Oxford scale and Schirmer test score < 10 mm/ 5 min were enrolled for once-daily CsA use in this observational, prospective, one-center study. Efficacy of CE at 30, 60, and 90-day follow-up visit was evaluated using OSDI questionnaire. Both the overall OSDI score and the outcomes for all subscales - ocular symptoms (OS), vision-related function (VRF) and environmental triggers (ET) were considered. Results: Twelve patients (10 women and 2 men), whose baseline OSDI ranged between 27.08 and 70.03 mm (48.2 ± 11.8), were included. Their achieved mean scores for subscales such OS, VRF and ET were 66.6 ± 16.8, 42.2 ± 12.0 and 42.2 ± 12.5, respectively. Statistically significant results were obtained after 30 days for OSDI (45.5 ± 10.0; p=0.011), whereas after 90 days for both OSDI (35.4 ± 7.4; p=0.003) and OS (47.2 ± 10.9; p=0.005), VRF (30.5 ± 6.1; p=0.003) and ET (33.3 ± 11.2; p=0.008). Conclusions: CsA CE significantly reduced symptoms of patients with DED. Recovery was the most successful after 90 days of treatment and included OSDI, OS, VRF and ET. Abbreviations: CE = cationic emulsion, CFS = corneal fluorescein staining, CsA = cyclosporine A, DED = dry eye disease, ET = environmental triggers, OS = ocular symptoms, OSDI = ocular surface disease index, VRF = vision-related function.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Evaluation of the Efficacy of TJO-087 Versus 0.05% Cyclosporine A in Moderate to Severe Dry Eye

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and ocular tolerability of a 0.08% nanoemulsion cyclosporine A (CsA) (TJO-087) once daily versus a conventional 0.05% emulsion CsA twice daily in dry eye disease. Methods: 178 patients with dry eye disease were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the TJO-087 or CsA0.05% group. Changes in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film break-up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and Schirmer test scores from baseline to the 32-week visit were compared between both groups. To evaluate ocular tolerability of the study formulations, 7 symptoms (stinging/burning, itching, blurred vision, sandiness/grittiness, dryness, light sensitivity, and pain or soreness) were evaluated (the higher the score, the lower the tolerability) at each follow-up visit. Results: A total of 155 eyes of 155 patients were enrolled. The TJO-087 and CsA0.05% groups showed significant improvement in OSDI, TBUT, ocular surface staining, and Schirmer test scores at 32 weeks from baseline. There was no difference in the extent of improvement in all efficacy parameters. There were no differences in the ocular tolerability scores between the 2 groups at all visits, except that the itching score was higher in the TJO-087 group than in the CsA0.05% group at week 8. Conclusions: Using topical 0.08% CsA once daily is an effective therapeutic option for improving the symptoms and signs in dry eye disease, with a tolerability comparable with that of conventional 0.05% CsA. This trial was registered at the US National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrial.gov) as NCT05245604 (registration date: 19/06/2020).

[Modern possibilities of pathogenetically oriented therapy for dry eye syndrome]

In recent years, anti-inflammatory therapy has become a significant part of the complex approach to treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome (DES), with cyclosporine preparations becoming increasingly important in the structure of the therapy. Taking into account the immunosuppressive effect of cyclosporine A, which is realized through hindering the activation of T-lymphocytes in the tissues of the ocular surface, its topical application in DES has a pronounced pathogenetic focus. Numerous clinical studies have shown that instillations of cyclosporine into the conjunctival cavity contribute to an increase in total tear production, as well as recovery of the density of goblet cells in the conjunctiva of DES patients. The positive effect of cyclosporine A instillations has been convincingly demonstrated in the complex therapy of patients with vernal and atopic corneal conjunctivitis, Thygeson's superficial punctate keratitis, autoimmune keratitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, etc. However, one significant problem associated with cyclosporine A instillations is the irritating effect of the drug. That prompted the development of a drug that is safe and tolerable during instillations into the conjunctival cavity - preservative-free 0.1% cyclosporine A labelled Ikervis (Santen, Japan). The drug carrier is artificial tear Cationorm (Santen), which has an advantage of stabilizing the tear film and protecting the ocular surface from the irritating effect of cyclosporine. According to numerous clinical studies, Ikervis instillations can improve the effectiveness of complex therapy in patients with DES (especially secondary to Sjögren syndrome, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, graft-versus-host disease), with allergic diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva (spring, atopic corneal conjunctivitis), with corneal transplant disease, and other similar conditions. The high efficacy and safety of Ikervis constitute the reason to recommend it for wide clinical use.

Engineering Advanced Drug Delivery Systems for Dry Eye: A Review

Dry eye disease (DED) is a widespread and frequently reported multifactorial ocular disease that not only causes ocular discomfort but also damages the cornea and conjunctiva. At present, topical administration is the most common treatment modality for DED. Due to the existence of multiple biological barriers, instilled drugs generally exhibit short action times and poor penetration on the ocular surface. To resolve these issues, several advanced drug delivery systems have been proposed. This review discusses new dosage forms of drugs for the treatment of DED in terms of their characteristics and advantages. Innovative formulations that are currently available in the market and under clinical investigation are elaborated. Meanwhile, their deficiencies are discussed. It is envisioned that the flourishing of advanced drug delivery systems will lead to improved management of DED in the near future.

Management of inflammation in dry eye disease: Recommendations from a European panel of experts

Introduction

Early initiation of anti-inflammatory therapies is recommended for dry eye disease (DED) to break the vicious cycle of pathophysiology. However, there is limited guidance on how to implement topical ciclosporin (CsA) and corticosteroid treatment into clinical practice. This expert-led consensus provides practical guidance on the management of DED, including when and how to use topical CsA.

Methods

A steering committee (SC) of seven European DED experts developed a questionnaire to gain information on the unmet needs and management of DED in clinical practice. Consensus statements on four key areas (disease severity and progression; patient management; efficacy, safety and tolerability of CsA; and patient education) were generated based on the responses. The SC and an expanded expert panel of 22 members used a nine-point scale (1  =  strongly disagree; 9  =  strongly agree) to rate statements; a consensus was reached if ≥75% of experts scored a statement ≥7.

Results

A stepwise approach to DED management is required in patients presenting with moderate corneal staining. Early topical CsA initiation, alone or with corticosteroids, should be considered in patients with clinical risk factors for severe DED. Patient education is required before and during treatment to manage expectations regarding efficacy and tolerability in order to optimise adherence. Follow-up visits are required, ideally at Month 1 and every 3 months thereafter. Topical CsA may be continued indefinitely, especially when surgery is required.

Conclusion

This consensus fills some of the knowledge gaps in previous recommendations regarding the use of topical corticosteroids and CsA in patients with DED.

Effectiveness of Topical Cyclosporin A 0.1%, Diquafosol Tetrasodium 3%, and Their Combination, in Dry Eye Disease

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of the topical use of cyclosporin A (CsA) 0.1%, diquafosol (DQS) tetrasodium 3% ophthalmic solution, and their combination in treating dry eye disease in a general health care setting. Methods: This prospective, nonrandomized, observational study analyzed 279 patients. Patients instilled topical CsA 0.1% (Ikervis^®; Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan) once daily and/or DQS tetrasodium 3% (Diquas-S^®; Santen) six times a day for 12 weeks. Objective signs [tear break-up time (TBUT), National Eye Institute (NEI) corneal and conjunctival staining scores] and symptoms [Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) and Dry Eye-related Quality-of-Life Score (DEQS) questionnaires] were evaluated at baseline, week 4, and week 12. Results: Patients (n = 279) were mainly female (85.0%) with a mean (SD) age of 50.1 (14.8) years, and received CsA (n = 93), DQS (n = 99), or CsA/DQS (n = 87). Both monotherapies and CsA/DQS combination therapy significantly improved TBUT, NEI corneal and conjunctival staining scores, and SANDE and DEQS scores from baseline to week 12 (all P < 0.0001). The mean change in TBUT between baseline and week 12 was significantly higher in CsA/DQS combination therapy (2.13 ± 2.41 s) than in CsA monotherapy (1.07 ± 1.71 s; P = 0.0011). Conclusions: Monotherapy with CsA or DQS and CsA/DQS combination therapy all significantly improved the objective signs and symptoms of dry eyes during 12 weeks of treatment. CsA/DQS combination therapy provides an additional benefit in terms of TBUT compared with CsA alone; however, a randomized controlled trial still needs to be performed to confirm this result.

Efficacy and Safety of 0.1% Cyclosporine versus 2% Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis in Children

INTRODUCTION

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is an inflammatory condition in children that can cause severe eye complications. Treatment is based on corticosteroid therapy during flare-ups, then antihistamines and cyclosporine in calmer periods. The dosage and posology of cyclosporine are subject to debate.

METHODS

The aim of the study is to compare the evolution in symptomatic and clinical scores, and need for topical corticosteroid treatment in a population of children with severe VKC treated with two dosages of cyclosporine treatment (0.1% and 2%). Data were compiled on inclusion then every three months from March, with a total follow-up duration of 12 months. Data concerning patient evolutions and complications were collected for the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 46 children was 8.8 ±2.4 years with age at onset of symptoms of 5.1 ± 0.9 years. The cohort was predominantly (65%) male. Corticosteroid dependence on inclusion was present in 52% of the children included. A significant improvement in the various symptomatic and clinical scores was observed following treatment with cyclosporine (0.1% and 2%). Use of topical corticosteroid treatment reduced from 19 drops per month on inclusion to 4 drops per month at 12 months. Safety was comparable for the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatments with cyclosporine 0.1% and 2% lead to a favourable evolution in clinical and symptomatic scores and reduced corticosteroid use. Cyclosporine 0.1% is an interesting alternative to the 2% dosage, particularly due to its availability and ease of handling.

Intense pulsed light improves signs and symptoms of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction: A randomized controlled study

Purpose

To compare the safety and efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX), against monotherapy of MGX.

Methods

Patients with moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) were 1:1 randomized to 4 sessions of intense pulse light + MGX at 2-week intervals, or 4 sessions of Sham + MGX at 2-week intervals. Both patients and examiners were blinded to the allocation. Outcome measures, evaluated at the baseline (BL) and at a follow-up (FU) conducted 4 weeks after the last IPL session, included fluorescein tear breakup time (TBUT) as the primary outcome measure, OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) questionnaire, Eye Dryness Score (EDS, a visual analog scale (VAS)-based questionnaire), Meibomian gland score (MGS, a score of meibum expressibility and quality in 15 glands on the lower eyelid), daily use of artificial tears, and daily use of warm compresses. In addition, during each treatment session, the number of expressible glands was counted in both eyelids, the predominant quality of meibum was estimated in both eyelids, and the level of pain/discomfort due to MGX and IPL was recorded.

Results

TBUT increased from 3.8±0.2 (μ±standard error of mean (SEM)) to 4.5±0.3 seconds in the control arm, and from 4.0±0.2 to 6.0±0.3 in the study arm. The difference between arms was statistically significant (P < .01). Other signs/symptoms which improved in both arms but were greater in the study arm included MGS (P < .001), EDS (P < .01), the number of expressible glands in the lower eyelids (P < .0001) and upper eyelid (P < .0001), the predominant meibum quality in the lower eyelid (P < .0001) and upper eyelid (P < .0001), and the level of pain due to MGX (P < .0001). Outcome measures which improved in both arms with no significant differences between the two were OSDI (P = .9984), and the daily use of artificial tears (P = .8216). Meibography, daily use of warm compresses, and severity of skin rosacea did not show statistically significant changes in either arm. No serious adverse events were observed. There was a slight tendency for more adverse events in the control group (P = 0.06).

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that, in patients with moderate to severe symptoms, combination therapy of intense pulse light (IPL) and meibomian gland expression (MGX) could be a safe and useful approach for improving signs of dry eye disease (DED) due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Future studies are needed to elucidate if and how such improvements can be generalized to different severity levels of MGD.

Selective Pharmacologic Therapies for Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety Data Review from Preclinical Studies and Pivotal Trials

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca, also known as dry eye disease (DED), is a prevalent, multifactorial disease associated with compromised ocular lubrication, ocular surface inflammation and damage, and ocular symptoms. Several anti-inflammatory, topical ophthalmic therapies are available to treat clinical signs and symptoms of DED in the USA and Europe. Cyclosporine A (CsA)-based formulations include an ophthalmic emulsion of 0.05% CsA (CsA 0.05%), a cationic emulsion (CE) of CsA 0.1% (CsA CE), and an aqueous nanomicellar formulation of 0.09% CsA (OTX-101). Lifitegrast is a 5% ophthalmic solution of a lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 antagonist that is believed to target T cell activation and recruitment to inhibit ocular inflammation. Here we provide a comprehensive review summarising preclinical studies and pivotal trial data for these treatments to provide a complete understanding of their efficacy and safety profile. Overall, data in the evaluated studies show a favourable risk-benefit profile for the use of targeted topical anti-inflammatory pharmacologic treatments in patients with DED. Pivotal trials for CsA 0.05%, CsA CE, OTX-101, and lifitegrast clearly demonstrate treatment efficacy compared to vehicle across treatments with no serious ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Patients using ophthalmic treatments reported ocular TEAEs more frequently than those treated with vehicle; however, relatively few TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation. The specific signs and symptoms of DED that improve with treatment vary with the treatment prescribed. Long-term and direct comparative studies between treatments are needed to further understand treatment differences in efficacy and safety profiles.

Dry eye disease, a prominent manifestation of systemic autoimmune disorders

OBJECTIVES

Dry eye disease (DED) is arguably the most frequent ocular disease encountered in ophthalmic clinical practice. DED is frequently an underestimated condition causing a significant impact on visual function and quality of life. Many systemic autoimmune diseases (SAIDs) are related to moderate to severe DED. The main objective of this review is to enhance the awareness among ophthalmologists of the potential association of an underlying SAID in a high-risk patient with DED.

METHODS

An exhaustive literature search was performed in the National Library of Medicine's Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for all English language articles published until November 2021. The main keywords included "dry eye disease" associated with autoimmune, connective tissue, endocrine, gastrointestinal, hematopoietic, vascular, and pulmonary diseases. Case reports, series, letters to the editor, reviews, and original articles were included.

RESULTS

Although DED is frequently associated with SAIDs, its diagnosis is commonly delayed or missed, producing significant complications, including corneal ulceration, melting, scleritis, uveitis, and optic neuritis resulting in severe complications detrimental to visual function and quality of life. SAID should be suspected in a woman, 30 to 60 years old with a family history of autoimmunity, presenting with DED symptoms and extraocular manifestations including arthralgias, dry mouth, unexplained weight and hair loss, chronic fatigue, heat or cold intolerance, insomnia, and mood disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishing the correct diagnosis and treatment of DED associated with SAIDs is crucial to avoid its significant burden and severe ocular complications.

Real-World Effectiveness, Tolerability and Safety of Cyclosporine A 0.1% Cationic Emulsion in Severe Keratitis and Dry Eye Treatment

Introduction

The PERSPECTIVE study evaluated, in routine clinical practice, the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.1% cationic emulsion (CE) in controlling severe keratitis in adults with dry eye who remained insufficiently controlled despite artificial tear (AT) use.

Methods

A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted at 44 ophthalmology clinics across Finland, Germany, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Adults treated with ATs for severe keratitis and dry eye received CsA 0.1% CE therapy (1 drop in both eyes at bedtime) and were followed up at weeks 4, 12 and 24 and at month 12. Primary endpoint was mean [standard deviation (SD)] change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS; Oxford Grade Scale) at month 12 following CsA 0.1% CE initiation. Secondary endpoints examined ocular sign and symptom severity and adverse events (AEs).

Results

The full analysis set included 472 adults (75.9% female). Mean (SD) age was 61.9 (15.41) years. Mean (SD) CFS score was significantly reduced from baseline [2.56 (1.10)] at month 12 [1.10 (SD 1.13); P < 0.0001]. CFS score reductions were statistically significant from week 4, with further incremental decreases reported at study visits through month 12 (P < 0.0001). Severity of eyelid and conjunctival erythema was significantly reduced from baseline at week 4 and maintained through month 12 (P < 0.001). Tear film breakup time increased significantly from baseline at all study visits through month 12 (P < 0.001). Ocular symptom severity was significantly reduced from baseline at all study visits through month 12 (P < 0.001). Overall, 101 treatment-related AEs were reported. Most were mild/moderate (83.6%) and resolved by month 12 (73.3%).

Conclusions

In routine clinical practice, CsA 0.1% CE provided statistically significant reductions in dry eye signs and symptoms. Improvements were seen at week 4 and maintained over 12 months. Treatment tolerability was good and consistent with previous CsA 0.1% CE clinical studies.

Trial registration

EU PAS register number: EUPAS 22376.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00487-x.

Attrition und Osmokinetik – Zwei Konzepte zur Pathogenese des Trockenen Auges

Die neuen Erkenntnisse der Pathophysiolgie des Trockenen Auges erkennen das Zusammenspiel von Tränen, Augenoberfläche und Lidoberfläche als eine funktionelle Einheit an. Der Begriff der Benetzungsfähigkeit der Tränen in Abhängigkeit der mikrotektonischen Anatomie der Augenoberfläche relativiert die Anforderungen an Träne und Tränenersatzmittel. Das Model der Attrition, welches die Effekte der friktionsneutralisierenden Kapazität des Tränenfilms, der Reibung und die Bedeutung der Mechanotransduktionskapazität des Epithels zusammenfasst, wird eingeführt und dessen pathophysiologische Bedeutung erläutert. Attrition und Benetzung bestimmen zusammen grundlegende pathophysiologische Vorgänge in der Augenoberfläche wie Aktivierung von Nerven (subjektive Beschwerden) sowie Entzündung und beeinflussen damit die Dynamik der Pathophysiologie, und den Übergang von vorübergehenden Beschwerden zu einer manifesten Erkrankung des Trockenen Auges. Die Betrachtung der Osmolarität als numerischer statischer Grenzwert zur alleinigen Diagnose des Trockenen Auges ist klinisch nicht haltbar. Das neue, dynamische Model der Osmokinetik, zeigt dagegen eine Alternative auf, in der die Tageschwankungen und die Beachtung des durchschnittlichen Osmolaritätsniveaus gröβere Bedeutung gewinnen und damit der eigentlichen pathophysiologischen Bedeutung der Osmolarität gerechter wird.

Efficacy of Switching from Cyclosporine A 0.05% Anionic Emulsion to Cyclosporine A 0.1% Cationic Emulsion in Patients with Dry Eye Associated with Sjögren's Syndrome

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of switching from cyclosporine A (CsA) 0.05% anionic emulsion (CsA AE) to CsA 0.1% cationic emulsion (CsA CE) in patients with dry eye (DE) associated with Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Methods: Forty patients with SS-associated DE who were unresponsive to CsA AE for 6 months were enrolled. After baseline measurements, the CsA AE was switched to CsA CE. The ocular surface disease index (OSDI), Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA), and Schirmer's test scores and tear film breakup time (TBUT) were evaluated at baseline and 1 and 3 months after switching. Results: Two patients dropped out, and 38 were analyzed. OSDI and SICCA ocular staining scores were significantly reduced at 1 and 3 months after switching, compared with the baseline scores (all P < 0.01). Although no significant changes were noted in the corneal staining scores (CSSs), patients with higher baseline CSS (≥4) showed an improvement in the scores at 1 month (P = 0.03) and 3 months (P = 0.01) after switching. There were no significant changes in TBUT and Schirmer's test scores during the follow-up periods. Conclusions: In patients with SS-associated DE, switching from CsA AE to CsA CE was effective in improving ocular symptoms and conjunctival staining. In addition, corneal staining was decreased in patients with severe keratitis.

A Narrative Review of Current Understanding and Classification of Dry Eye Disease with New Insights on the Impact of Dry Eye during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex, progressive and multifactorial condition that is commonly seen in clinical practice and can be challenging to accurately diagnose. Untreated or suboptimally managed dry eye can progress to severe, chronic disease which may become resistant to treatment. Symptoms include ocular irritation and visual impairment. Patients frequently report negative consequences regarding quality of life (QoL), productivity and psychological wellbeing. Certain lifestyle factors (e.g. use of screen-based devices, air conditioning) can induce or exacerbate symptoms of DED, leading to progressive and debilitating complications. Exposures to such triggers are likely to have increased significantly during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic with people across the globe living with heightened levels of stress/anxiety while being forced to adapt most aspects of their daily lives (from work and education through to social activities) to accommodate social distancing, primarily through the use digital technologies. This review aims to provide a concise and practical overview of current understanding regarding DED, highlighting proposals for refined diagnostic categories and therapeutic terminologies that are designed to improve identification and management of dry eye as well as reduce or slow disease progression. Finally, the findings of a European survey are shared to illustrate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of people with DED. The survey was conducted during the first lockdown period (March–September 2020) and explored issues relating to psychological wellbeing, QoL and engagement with healthcare services. The results demonstrate the ways in which the pandemic amplified the impact of dry eye on daily life and may be valuable in enhancing understanding among clinicians of the challenges faced by people with DED, which extend beyond the signs and symptoms of disease.

Assessment of the Compliance with 0.1% Cyclosporine A in Dry-Eye Patients with Sjögren's Syndrome

Purpose: To evaluate the compliance with 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry eye patients with Sjögren's syndrome and identify factors affecting the compliance. Methods: This study included 67 dry eye patients with Sjögren's syndrome who had used 0.1% cyclosporine A for over 6 months. Clinical parameters including sex, age, the number of eye drops used, side effects, the use of steroid eye drops, and the visit interval were investigated. Additionally, the ocular surface disease index, tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test score, and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score were assessed. Patients were classified into compliant and non-compliant groups, using a criterion of 50% compliance; relevant factors were evaluated accordingly. Results: Of the 67 patients, 36 (53.7%) were classified into the compliant group and 31 (46.3%) into the non-compliant group. Compared to the non-compliant group, the compliant group showed a longer TBUT (p = 0.03) and a lower CFS score (p = 0.04) at 6 months of follow-up. Altogether, 39 subjects (58.2%) experienced side effects, of which the most common was stinging pain (71.8%). In the multivariate analysis, severe dry-eye symptoms (p = 0.03), non-use of the steroid eye drops (p = 0.02), and longintervals between exam vitists (p = 0.02) were identified as factors reducing compliance. Conclusions: Factors related to a decrease in the compliance with 0.1% cyclosporine A in dry-eye patients with Sjögren's syndrome, included severe dry eye symptoms, long visit intervals, and non-use of steroid eye drops. Taking these factors into consideration may help increase patient compliance.

The Enduring Experience in Dry Eye Diagnosis: A Non-Interventional Study Comparing the Experiences of Patients Living With and Without Sjögren's Syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have examined the patient experience regarding the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease (DED). The current study explored the ways in which the DED diagnostic pathway differs for those living with and without Sjögren's syndrome (SS), to identify aspects that influence the patient experience and associated quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

An observational/descriptive, non-interventional, retrospective, self-reported online survey was conducted among adults living in France, Spain and Italy who were diagnosed with DED (with/without SS), were using topical DED treatments (≥ 6 months), and were not contact lens users. Recruitment was via an online database for non-SS participants and through local patient advocacy groups for SS respondents.

RESULTS

The analysis included 827 respondents; 416 (50.3%) had SS and 82% were female. The mean age was 55 (SD 11; range 16-99) years. The mean age at diagnosis was 46 (SD 12; range 13-78) years and 50 (SD 10; range 21-73) years for SS and non-SS groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean time to diagnosis was extended for SS participants [32 (SD 62) months] versus non-SS individuals [8.6 (SD 28) months (p < 0.0001)] and was associated with reduced QoL scores (r = 0.113; p = 0.0169). More SS participants (31%) consulted ≥ 4 healthcare professionals (HCPs) before DED diagnosis, versus non-SS individuals (6%) (p < 0.0001). Diagnosing clinician varied for SS respondents according to country, probably due to differences in healthcare systems/structures. More SS participants viewed their condition as a handicap than a discomfort, reporting greater QoL impact (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient experiences in DED diagnosis vary substantially when comparing SS and non-SS individuals. Time to diagnosis significantly impacts QoL for SS patients, who see more HCPs ahead of DED diagnosis. The number of HCPs consulted before diagnosis and perceptions of DED are important for both groups. Country-specific variations highlight opportunities to improve consistency and efficiency across DED diagnostic pathways. These data should be considered alongside existing evidence from high-quality sources (e.g. clinical records).

Dry Eye Treatment with Topical Cyclosporine 0.1% in Chondroitin Sulfate Ophthalmic Emulsion

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of topical cyclosporine 0.1% in chondroitin sulfate emulsion for the treatment of dry eye.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study included 100 eyes of 50 dry eye patients aged ≥18 years, with preoperative ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score >12 or corneal staining grade >1 (in either eye) who underwent dry eye treatment with topical cyclosporine 0.1% in chondroitin sulfate emulsion (Klarity-C, ImprimisRx) for 3 months. Postoperative evaluation included comparison of the changes in OSDI score and corneal staining grade after 3 months of treatment from baseline.

Results

From baseline to 3 months, a statistically significant improvement in mean OSDI scores (38.19 vs 24.18, p <0.001) as well as mean corneal staining grade (3.62 vs 2.20, p <0.001) was observed. The proportion of subjects with severe dry eye decreased from 62% to 20% and more than one-third (34%) of patients were in the normal OSDI range. The percentage of eyes with corneal staining grade of 2 or 3 decreased from 21% (baseline) to 8% at 3 months; 50% of the eyes had corneal staining grade of 0. The treatment was found to be safe with no adverse events observed in the study.

Conclusion

Dry eye treatment with twice daily cyclosporine 0.1% in chondroitin sulfate emulsion was found to be safe and effective in reducing signs and symptoms of dry eye.

Ocular surface response of two preservative-free cylcosporine A emulsion eye drops in a mouse model of dry eye

PURPOSE/AIM

Dry eye (DE) disease is a multifactorial disease in which uncontrolled inflammation can lead to corneal epithelium lesions and symptoms of discomfort. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of two cyclosporine emulsions in a mouse model of DE with corneal epithelium lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six- to 9-week-old female C57BL/6 N mice were housed in a controlled-environment room to induce DE. Following DE development, mice were instilled with: QD 0.1%CsA cationic emulsion (CaEm), BID 0.05%CsA anionic emulsion (AEm), or left untreated. Aqueous tear production and corneal epithelium lesions were assessed throughout the experiment. At the end of the treatment period, left eyes were sampled, fixed, and stained for histology, while the cornea, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland of right eyes were sampled for transcriptomic analysis.

RESULTS

Corneal lesion scores were reduced by 10.4%, 18.4%, and 10.9% at day 6, 10, and 14, respectively, with CaEm (QD), and by 2.6%, 3.0%, and 5.5% at day 6, 10, and 14, respectively, with AEm (BID). Histology demonstrated that 7 out of 10 DE mice presented moderate to severe ocular lesions, while only 2 and 5 out of 10 mice presented slight to moderate ocular lesions when treated with the CaEm (QD) and AEm (BID), respectively. The transcriptomic profile analysis suggests that a different set of inflammatory genes are modulated in the cornea, conjunctiva, and lacrimal gland upon DE development. In addition, the two emulsions distinctively modulate the gene expression profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that both emulsions were effective at reducing corneal lesions, with the CaEm (QD) being slightly better than the AEm (BID). Interestingly, this study suggests that ocular tissues may not respond similarly to a dry environment and that a different set of genes is modulated by the two formulations in the ocular tissues.

Liposomes as vehicles for topical ophthalmic drug delivery and ocular surface protection

Introduction: The development of ophthalmic formulations able to deliver hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs to the inner structures of the eye and restore the preocular tear film has been a leading topic of discussion over the last few years. In this sense, liposomes represent a suitable strategy to achieve these objectives in ocular drug delivery.Areas covered: Knowledge of the different physiological and anatomical eye structures, and specially the ocular surface are critical to better understanding and comprehending the characteristics required for the development of topical ophthalmic liposomal formulations. In this review, several features of liposomes are discussed such as the main materials used for their fabrication, basic structure and preparation methods, from already established to novel techniques, allowing the control and design of special characteristics. Besides, physicochemical properties, purification processes and strategies to overcome delivery or encapsulation challenges are also presented. Expert opinion: Regarding ocular drug delivery of liposomes, there are some features that can be redesigned. Specific biocompatible and biodegradable materials presenting therapeutic properties, such as lipidic compounds or polymers significantly change the way of tackling ophthalmic diseases. Besides, liposomes entail an effective, safe and versatile strategy for the treatment of diseases in the clinical practice.

Protective Effects of Cyclosporine A Emulsion Versus Cyclosporine A Cationic Emulsion Against Desiccation Stress in Human Corneal Epithelial Cells

PURPOSE

To compare the protective effects of cyclosporine A emulsion (Restasis: 0.05% cyclosporine A) (CsAE) and cyclosporine A cationic emulsion (Ikervis: 0.1% cyclosporine A) (CsACE) on cellular inflammation, apoptosis, proliferation, and survival in an in vitro dry eye model.

METHODS

The concentration of CsA in CsAE and CsACE was verified using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry system. Human corneal epithelial cells were subjected to desiccation stress. Human corneal epithelial cells were incubated with or without 3 groups of cyclosporine A medium (CsAE 1:50, CsACE 1:50, and CsACE 1:100). p-NF-κB p65, p-IκBα, Bax, Bcl-xL, p-Erk1/2, and p-Akt levels were determined using Western blots, and TNF-α levels were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

The CsA concentration of CsACE 1:100 was nearly the same as that of CsAE 1:50. Compared with CsAE 1:50 (0.78 ± 0.19 fold), the p-NF-κB p65 level was further reduced in CsACE 1:50 (0.38 ± 1.20 fold) and 1:100 (0.29 ± 0.11 fold) as well as p-IκBα. Levels of TNF-α were also lower in CsACE 1:50 and 1:100 than in CsAE 1:50. Induction of the apoptotic protein Bax was significantly decreased in CsACE 1:50 and 1:100 compared with CsAE 1:50, whereas that of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL was increased in CsACE 1:50 and 1:100. p-ERK1/2 and p-Akt levels were higher in CsACE 1:50 and 1:100 than in CsAE 1:50.

CONCLUSIONS

CsACE had more potent anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects than CsAE in a transwell desiccation stress model. CsACE also enhanced proliferation and survival factors under desiccation stress compared with CsAE in this in vitro dry eye model.

Preclinical Efficacy Comparison of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% vs Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05% vs Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.1% in a NOD Mouse Model of Dry Eye Disease

Introduction

Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CsA 0.09% sol) is approved to increase tear production in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. This study evaluated the efficacy of CsA 0.09% sol vs cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (CsA 0.05% eml) vs ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.1% (CsA 0.1% eml) in a NOD mice model.

Methods

Mice were randomized and administered placebo, CsA 0.09% sol twice daily, CsA 0.05% eml twice daily, CsA 0.09% sol once daily, or CsA 0.1% eml once daily in the conjunctival sac of both eyes for 60 days. Tear volume was measured with phenol red threads at baseline and 4 hours after treatment every 15 days. On day 58, the corneal surface was observed under a slit-lamp after staining with 3% lissamine green administered into the inferior lateral conjunctival sac. On day 61, mice were euthanized, globes excised, sliced into 4 µm sections in 3 areas per section, and stained. Total number of stained goblet cell/µm was counted, and the sum per eye was averaged. Lacrimal gland tissues were removed and interleukin (IL) 1-β cytokine levels estimated.

Results

Groups comprised 11 mice each, including an untreated normal and untreated diseased control group (7 groups total). CsA 0.09% sol twice daily significantly increased tear volume on day 30, 45, and 60 vs CsA 0.05% eml (P<0.05, <0.001, <0.001, respectively) and vs CsA 0.1% eml on day 60 (P<0.05); CsA 0.09% sol once daily significantly increased tear volume on day 45 vs CsA 0.05% eml (P<0.05). Goblet cell density significantly increased with CsA 0.09% sol twice daily vs placebo and NOD control (P<0.01 both). There was no significant difference in corneal staining and IL-1β levels with CsA 0.09% sol.

Conclusion

Sixty-day treatment with CsA 0.09% sol showed comparatively improved preclinical results vs CsA 0.05% eml and CsA 0.1% eml.

Cyclosporine Anionic and Cationic Ophthalmic Emulsions in Dry Eye Disease: A Literature Review

PURPOSE

There are no clinical studies directly comparing anionic and cationic emulsions of cyclosporine for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED). We therefore conducted a literature review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these different formulations.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Embase and Medline from January 1999 to May 2019 to identify publications that evaluated clinical outcomes with either cyclosporine anionic or cationic emulsion in patients with moderate-to-severe or severe DED.

RESULTS

Thirteen publications met criteria. In patients with moderate-to-severe disease, evidence demonstrated improvement in the signs of DED with both formulations. However, improvement in symptoms was not consistently demonstrated. Studies specifically in severe DED were only identified with the cationic emulsion and showed improvement in the objective signs of DED. There were no obvious differences in tolerability between products.

CONCLUSIONS

Both formulations are effective for the treatment of moderate-to-severe DED and are well tolerated.

Tolerance and Adherence to Cationic 0.1% Cyclosporine in Ocular Graft-versus-Host Disease

INTRODUCTION

Anti-inflammatory, topical therapy of severe keratitis in dry eye disease (DED) and ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGvHD) includes steroids, cyclosporine (Cs), and others. In Germany, a commercial product containing 0.1% Cs in a cationic formulation is available since 2015.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present real-life data using cationic 0.1% Cs in oGvHD patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 26 oGvHD and 41 DED patients with corneal staining of at least Oxford grade III. Parameters analyzed were Ocular Surface Disease Index, corneal staining, intraocular pressure, tear film break-up time, Schirmer, and visual acuity. In addition, it was evaluated how different Cs formulations were tolerated.

RESULTS

Corneal staining improved significantly in 1 eye in DED but not in oGvHD. In DED, cationic 0.1% Cs was not tolerated by 32% of the patients, in contrast to 0.05% Cs in castor oil not tolerated by 47% and liposomal 0.05% Cs by 63%. In oGvHD patients, cationic 0.1% Cs was not tolerated by 62%, 0.05% Cs in castor oil by 33%, and liposomal 0.05% Cs by 39% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates differences between the tolerance of different Cs formulations depending on the underlying cause of severe keratitis. Cationic 0.1% Cs is considerably less tolerated in oGvHD, and its use should be considered with care.

Twelve-Month Results of Cyclosporine A Cationic Emulsion in a Randomized Study in Patients With Pediatric Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine A cationic emulsion (CsA CE) 0.1% eye drops in pediatric patients with severe active vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).

DESIGN

Multicenter, double-masked, randomized controlled trial 8-month safety analysis.

METHODS

Of 169 patients (age range, 4-17 years) initially randomized in the 4-month VErnal KeratoconjunctiviTIs Study (VEKTIS), 142 entered the 8-month follow-up period during which CsA CE patients remained on their original regimen (CsA CE 4 times daily [QID, high-dose] or CsA CE twice daily [BID, low-dose] + vehicle BID) and vehicle patients were allocated to one of these 2 active regimens. Main outcome measures were safety, including treatment-emergent adverse events, and efficacy, including corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score.

RESULTS

Improvements in CFS score, rescue medication use, key VKC symptoms (photophobia, tearing, itching, and mucous discharge), and quality of life (QoL) assessed by QUICK questionnaire observed with CsA CE compared with vehicle during the 4-month evaluation period remained stable during the 8-month follow-up period, with the high-dose regimen continuing to provide greater benefits in most efficacy measures. CsA CE was well tolerated. Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events during the 12-month study were reported in 15 (20.8%) and 11 (15.7%) of the CsA CE high-dose and low-dose patients, respectively, most commonly instillation site pain (13.9% and 7.1%, respectively). Laboratory data, vital signs, slit lamp examination, best-corrected distance visual acuity, and intraocular pressure raised no safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in keratitis, symptoms, and QoL achieved after CsA CE treatment for 4 months remained stable over the 8-month follow-up period. CsA continued to maintain a favorable safety profile.

Severe dysfunctional tear syndrome patients and resolution of central corneal staining: retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Severe dry eye is widely prevalent yet difficult to treat. This study aims to evaluate for improvement in epithelial status and the risk factors for lack of improvement in a cohort of patients in Singapore with severe dry eye.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 1712 patients with severe dry eye (≥grade 3 Delphi) in at least one eye, referred to a tertiary centre dry eye clinic from 2006 to 2017. We included patients with central corneal staining grade of ≥2 at referral and minimum follow-up duration of 6 months (n=407). An epithelial staining grade of <2 at the last visit was considered a significantly improved outcome.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 4.0±2.4 years, with 88.0% (358/407) of patients achieving significant improvement. Various treatment modalities including topical corticosteroids (32.4%), cyclosporine (52.8%) and punctal plugs (24.1%) were used. Risk factors for non-improvement of staining grade include autoimmune disease (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.7 to 6.1), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (OR 3.4 (1.8 to 6.6)), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (OR 3.4 (1.0 to 11.7)), reduced baseline Schirmer's test (OR 2.1 (1.2 to 3.9)) and reduced tear break up time (OR 2.0 (1.0 to 3.8)). On multivariate analyses, RA and GVHD were still significant risk factors. Gender, age and meibum viscosity were not significantly associated with epithelial staining grade improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, a high rate of corneal epithelial improvement was achieved. Nevertheless, there is an unmet need for more effective measures to reduce epitheliopathy in severe dry eye, especially in patients with systemic immune-mediated disease.

Managing Dry Eye Disease and Facilitating Realistic Patient Expectations: A Review and Appraisal of Current Therapies

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by loss of homeostasis of the tear film and accompanied by ocular signs and symptoms such as corneal and conjunctival damage, patient discomfort, and visual disturbance. The prevalence of DED ranges from 5%−33%. Patients with DED may have a reduced quality of life due to their discomfort and visual disturbances. The multifactorial nature of DED requires a multi-targeted treatment approach to address the signs and symptoms. Treatment for DED should follow a step-wise approach beginning with education, dietary modification, and lid and lash hygiene, and progressing to pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Ocular lubricants, a mainstay of DED therapy, provide temporary symptomatic relief for the patient, but do not address the underlying pathophysiology. Some currently available pharmacologic treatments that address the underlying pathophysiology of DED may have a delay of 3−6 months in the onset of therapeutic effect; however, these treatment options may also have tolerability issues. These challenges highlight the need for newer pharmacologic treatments with an earlier onset of observable clinical effect and the potential for improved tolerability profile. Patient education is vital to DED management and should convey the complex and chronic nature of DED. It is important for the eye care practitioner to set realistic expectations with the patient when managing DED to help improve treatment success. This helps the patient understand the need for ongoing treatment and that results will likely not be seen immediately. This review covers the current management of DED, focusing on pharmacologic management, and offers recommendations for the practitioner to help facilitate realistic patient expectations for the treatment of DED.

Topical cyclosporine A therapy for dry eye syndrome

BACKGROUND

Topical cyclosporine A (also known as ciclosporin A) (CsA) is an anti-inflammatory that has been widely used to treat inflammatory ocular surface diseases. Two CsA eyedrops have been approved by US Food and Drug Administration for managing dry eye: Restasis (CsA 0.05%, Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA, USA), approved in 2002, and Cequa (CsA 0.09%, Sun Pharma, Cranbury, NJ, USA), approved in 2018. Numerous clinical trials have been performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of CsA for dry eye; however, there is no universal consensus with regard to its effect.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of topical CsA in the treatment of dry eye.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2018, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 16 February 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people with dry eye regardless of age, sex, severity, etiology, or classification of dry eye. We included RCTs in which different concentrations of topical CsA were compared with one another or with artificial tears, placebo, or vehicle. We also included RCTs in which CsA in combination with artificial tears was compared to artificial tears alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed the standard Cochrane methodology and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs (4009 participants) with follow-up periods ranging from 6 weeks to 12 months. We studied dry eye of various severity and underlying causes. The interventions investigated also varied across RCTs: CsA versus artificial tears; CsA with artificial tears versus artificial tears alone; and in some studies, more than one concentration of CsA. Artificial tears were used as adjunctive to study medication in all but five trials. Almost all trials had deficiencies in the reporting of results (e.g. reporting P values or direction only), precluding the calculation of between-group estimates of effect or meta-analysis.Eighteen trials compared topical CsA 0.05% plus artificial tears versus vehicle plus artificial tears or artificial tears alone. One trial reported subjective symptoms of dry eye at 6 months and the results were in favor of CsA (mean difference (MD) -4.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.41 to -3.19; low-certainty evidence). Two trials reported MD in ocular surface dye staining at 6 months, but the results were inconsistent in these two trials (MD -0.35, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.01 in one and MD 0.58, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.10 in the other; low-certainty evidence). Four trials reported MD in Schirmer test scores at 6 months and the estimates ranged from -4.05 (95% CI -6.67 to -1.73) to 3.26 (95% CI -1.52 to 5.00) (low-certainty evidence). Three trials reported risk ratio (RR) of improved Schirmer test scores at 6 months; estimates ranged from 0.98 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.17) to 3.50 (95% CI 2.09 to 5.85) (low-certainty evidence). Four trials reported MD in tear film stability measured by tear break-up time at 6 months and the estimates ranged from -1.98 (95% CI -3.59 to -0.37) to 1.90 (95% CI 1.44 to 2.36) (low-certainty evidence). Three trials reported RR of improved tear break-up time at 6 months and the estimates ranged from 0.90 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.04) to 4.00 (95% CI 2.25 to 7.12) (low-certainty evidence). Three trials reported frequency of artificial tear usage at 6 months without providing any estimates of effect; the direction of effect seem to be in favor of CsA (low-certainty evidence). Because of incomplete reporting of the results data or considerable statistical heterogeneity, we were only able to perform a meta-analysis on mean conjunctival goblet cell density. Mean conjunctival goblet cell density in the CsA treated group may be greater than that in the control group at the end of follow-up at four and 12 months (MD 22.5 cells per unit, 95% CI 16.3 to 28.8; low-certainty evidence). All but two trials reported adverse events that included burning and stinging. Participants treated with CsA may be more likely to have treatment-related adverse events than those who treated with vehicle (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.78; low-certainty evidence).Other comparisons evaluated were CsA 0.05% plus artificial tears versus higher concentrations of CsA plus artificial tears (4 trials); CsA 0.05% versus placebo or vehicle (4 trials); CsA 0.1% plus artificial tears versus placebo or vehicle plus artificial tears (2 trials);CsA 0.1% cationic emulsion plus artificial tears versus vehicle plus artificial tears (2 trials); CsA 1% plus artificial tears versus placebo plus artificial tears (3 trials); and CsA 2% plus artificial tears versus placebo plus artificial tears (3 trials). Almost all of these trials reported P value or direction of effect only (mostly in favor of CsA), precluding calculation of between-group effect estimates or meta-analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite the widespread use of topical CsA to treat dry eye, we found that evidence on the effect of CsA on ocular discomfort and ocular surface and tear film parameters such as corneal fluorescein staining, Schirmer's test, and TBUT is inconsistent and sometimes may not be different from vehicle or artificial tears for the time periods reported in the trials. There may be an increase in non-serious, treatment-related adverse effects (particularly burning) in the CsA group. Topical CsA may increase the number of conjunctival goblet cells. However, current evidence does not support that improvements in conjunctival mucus production (through increased conjunctival goblet cells) translate to improved symptoms or ocular surface and tear film parameters. All published trials were short term and did not assess whether CsA has longer-term disease-modifying effects. Well-planned, long-term, large clinical trials are needed to better assess CsA on long-term dry eye-modifying effects. A core outcome set, which ideally includes both biomarkers and patient-reported outcomes in the field of dry eye, is needed.

Update on the role of impression cytology in ocular surface disease

Understanding of the molecular pathology of ocular surface disease (OSD) is poor, and treatment is highly unsatisfactory. To facilitate treatment of OSD, a relatively noninvasive procedure, i.e. impression cytology (IC) has been shown to be useful. Recently, the technologies employed in research studies using IC in OSD have vastly improved, and standardized IC has even been used in clinical trials of dry eye. Here, this review aims to describe the advances of IC in the last 10 years, which serves as an update on the progress in this field since the last major review of IC. OSD that has been recently evaluated include meibomian gland dysfunction, Sjogren's syndrome, Steven–Johnson syndrome, and postmenopausal dry eye. The recent studies (4 longitudinal, 18 cross-sectional analyses) which utilized IC analyzed DNA, RNA, proteins, and ocular surface cells, including memory T-lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), neutrophils, conjunctival epithelial cells, and goblet cells. These studies employed quantification of transcripts associated with inflammation, proteins involved in oxidative stress, enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases, and cell surface proteins by flow cytometry, such as HLA-DR, cytokine and chemokine receptors, markers for T cell differentiation, and DC activation, in addition to the more traditional morphological evaluation of squamous metaplasia and staining for goblet cells. Some challenges in the clinical use of IC have also been described, including issues related to storage and normalization of data. In summary, advances in IC have permitted a more robust evaluation of the ocular surface and will facilitate progress in the understanding and treatment of OSD.

Dry Eye Disease: A Review of Epidemiology in Taiwan, and its Clinical Treatment and Merits

Dry eye disease (DED) has become common on a global scale in recent years. There is a wide prevalence of DED in different countries based on various ethnicities and environment. DED is a multifactorial ocular disorder. In addition to advanced age and gender, such factors as living at high altitude, smoking, pterygium, prolonged use of consumer electronics or overingesting of caffeine or multivitamins are considered to be the major risk factors of DED. We report the DED epidemiology in Taiwan firstly in this article. According to the pathophysiological factors and changes inthe composition of the tear film in DED, it can be categorized into several subtypes, including lipid anomaly dry eye, aqueous tear deficiency, allergic and toxic dry eye among others. Each subtype has its own cause and disease management; therefore, it is important for ophthalmologists to identify the type through literature review and investigation. The management of DED, relies not only on traditional medications such as artificial tears, gels and ointments, but also newer treatment options such as acupuncture, SYL1001, and nanomedicine therapy. We also conducted a comprehensive literature review including common subtypes and treatment of DED. Clearly, more clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of the various treatments and common subtypes of DED.

Sjögren's Syndrome, Non-Sjögren's Syndrome, and Graft-Versus-Host Disease Related Dry Eye

I have reviewed available literature on dry eye related to Sjögren's syndrome (SS), non-Sjögren's syndrome (non-SS), and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to examine aqueous tear deficient dry eye as a subtype of dry eye. This section will focus on clinical studies regarding those subtypes of dry eye. I searched the PubMed database from 1990-2017 for discussion of clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and risk factors of SS, non-SS, and GVHD-related dry eye. In addition, therapeutic options for each subtype of dry eye are described. Although the clinical presentations of SS and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) are similar, ocular surface fibrotic changes are characteristic of ocular GVHD but not SS- or non-SS-related dry eye. Recently, diagnostic criteria for each disease have been proposed and include the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR-EULAR) for SS and the International Chronic Ocular GVHD consensus criteria. Although there has been gradual progress, there are currently no specific therapies and few approved treatment options for these intractable diseases, including SS and GVHD. As judged by the findings, these subtypes of dry eye are different clinical entities from simple dry eye. Therefore, novel therapies, specific to these subtypes of dry eye, may be required in the future.

Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies

BACKGROUND/AIM

To assess the treatment effect of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion (CsA CE) versus vehicle on signs/symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in various subgroups (moderate-to-severe DED/severe DED/Sjögren's syndrome (SS)/SS with severe DED).

METHODS

Pooled data were analysed from two similar phase III studies: SICCANOVE (moderate-to-severe DED) and SANSIKA (severe DED with severe keratitis). In both studies, patients aged ≥18 years received CsA CE 0.1% (n=395) or vehicle (n=339) once daily for 6 months. A composite responder efficacy endpoint (corneal fluorescein staining-Ocular Surface Disease Index (CFS-OSDI) at month 6) was used to evaluate the efficacy of CsA CE in alleviating signs/symptoms of DED (response defined as improvement of ≥2 grades in CFS and ≥30% in OSDI (baseline to month 6)). Human leucocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) conjunctival expression was used as a biomarker of ocular surface inflammation.

RESULTS

CsA CE-treated patients were significantly more likely to be CFS-OSDI responders than vehicle-treated patients in the overall (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.50; P=0.015), severe DED (1.80, 1.04 to 3.19; P=0.038) and SS with severe DED (3.37, 1.20 to 11.19; P=0.030) populations. The difference was not significant for CsA CE versus vehicle for the overall Sjögren's population (OR 1.77, CI 0.89 to 3.66; P=0.109). CsA CE also significantly reduced median HLA-DR expression versus vehicle at 6 months (P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Pooled phase III data indicate CsA CE produced significant improvement in signs/symptoms versus vehicle in patients with moderate-to-severe DED (especially in those with severe keratitis), including patients with SS with severe DED.

Preservative-Free Prostaglandin Analogs and Prostaglandin/Timolol Fixed Combinations in the Treatment of Glaucoma: Efficacy, Safety and Potential Advantages

Glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease (OSD) is a serious pathology with a broad spectrum of insidious clinical presentations and complex pathogenesis that undermines long-term glaucoma care. Preservatives, especially benzalkonium chloride (BAK), contained in topical intraocular pressure-lowering medications frequently cause or aggravate OSD in glaucoma. Management of these patients is challenging, and to date often empirical due to the scarcity of controlled long-term clinical trials. Most of the available data are extracted from case series and retrospective analysis. Preservative-free prostaglandins and prostaglandin/timolol fixed combinations are novel options developed to remove the harmful impact of preservatives, especially BAK, upon ocular tissues. Based on what is currently known on the value of preservative-free antiglaucoma therapies it is tempting to speculate how these new therapies may affect the future medical management of all glaucoma patients. This article provides a comprehensive and critical review of the current literature on preservative-free prostaglandins and preservative-free prostaglandin/timolol fixed combinations.

Interferons and Dry Eye in Sjögren's Syndrome

Various cytokines, including interferon (IFN)-γ and IL-17, are augmented, and autoreactive T cells and B cells are activated in the immune pathogenesis of Sjögren's syndrome (SS). In particular, IFNs are involved in both the early stages of innate immunity by high level of type I IFN in glandular tissue and sera and the later stages of disease progression by type I and type II IFN producing T cells and B cells through B cell activating factor in SS. Genetically modified mouse models for some of these molecules have been reported and will be discussed in this review. New findings from human SS and animal models of SS have elucidated some of the mechanisms underlying SS-related dry eye. We will discuss IFN-γ and several other molecules that represent candidate targets for treating inflammation in SS-related dry eye.