Intraarticular injections (corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, platelet rich plasma) for the knee osteoarthritis

Improved Pain and Function With Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release and Cryoneurolysis for Knee Osteoarthritis: Use of a New Real-World Registry

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) affects 19% of American adults aged more than 45 years and costs $27+ billion annually. A wide range of nonoperative treatment options are available. This study compared 6 treatments: cryoneurolysis with deep genicular nerve block (Cryo-Deep/Both), cryoneurolysis with superficial nerve block (Cryo-Superficial), intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) injections, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections (IA-NSAIDs), IA-corticosteroids (IA-CS) injections, or IA-triamcinolone extended release (IA-TA-ER) injections over 4 months for: (1) pain severity and analgesic use; and (2) physical function (from Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement).

METHODS

Patients who had unilateral knee OA and received nonoperative intervention were enrolled in the Innovations in Genicular Outcomes Research registry, a novel, multicenter real-world registry, between September 2021 and February 2024. A total of 480 patients were enrolled. Both pain and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline, weekly, and monthly, which were analyzed by overall trend, magnitude changes pretreatment to post-treatment, and distribution-based minimally clinically important difference (MCID) score. Multivariate linear regressions with adjustments for 7 confounding factors were used to compare follow-up outcomes among 6 treatment groups.

RESULTS

Use of IA-TA-ER injections was associated with the lowest pain, greatest pain reduction, and highest prevalence of patients achieving MCID relative to other treatments (P < .001). Deep/Both-Cryo and IA-CS were associated with a higher prevalence of achieving MCID than IA-HA, IA-NSAIDs, and Cryo-Superficial (P ≤ .001). Use of IA-TA-ER was also associated with the greatest functional score, improvement from baseline, and highest prevalence of patients achieving MCID than other treatments (P ≤ .003).

CONCLUSIONS

The IA-TA-ER appears to outperform other treatments in terms of pain relief and functional improvement for up to 4 months following treatment. In addition, outcomes in the novel cryoneurolysis and conventional IA-CS were similar to one another and better than those in IA-HA and IA-NSAIDs.

Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome as a novel therapeutic target for osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis, the most common arthritic condition, is an age-related progressive disease characterized by the loss of cartilage and synovial inflammation in the knees and hips. Development of pain, stiffness, and considerably restricted mobility of the joints are responsible for the production of matrix metalloproteinases and cytokines. Although several treatments are available for the management of this disease condition, they possess limitations at different levels. Recently, efforts have focused on regulating the production of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which plays a critical role in the disease's progression due to its dysregulation. Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome has shown the potential to modulate the production of MMP-13, caspase-1, IL-1β, etc., which has been reflected by positive responses in different preclinical and clinical studies. Aiming inhibition of this NLRP3 inflammasome, several compounds are in different stages of research owing to bring a novel agent for the treatment of osteoarthritis. This review summarizes the mechanistic pathways linking NLRP3 activation to osteoarthritis development and discusses the progress in new therapeutics aimed at effective treatment.

Efficacy of Amniotic Suspension Allografts in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Knee osteoarthritis significantly impacts mobility and quality of life. This condition is a leading cause of disability in aging populations, with total knee replacement commonly sought in advanced cases. Traditional nonoperative management strategies, including anti-inflammatories, corticosteroid injections, and hyaluronic acid, often provide limited relief, especially in severe cases. Recently, regenerative therapies such as amniotic suspension allografts (ASA) have emerged as promising alternatives due to their anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties, which may counteract the catabolic effects of osteoarthritis. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of ASA in reducing pain and improving function among knee osteoarthritis patients. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases initially identified 1,733 studies pertaining to ASA, of which 1,575 were screened, and 9 studies ultimately met the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis of ASA in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Data extraction and narrative synthesis focused on outcomes such as pain reduction and functional improvement using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), as well as safety profiles. The results demonstrated notable improvements in pain scores following ASA treatment, as shown by studies reporting increases in KOOS pain scores over 6 months, which generally outperformed hyaluronic acid and saline treatments in pain reduction. Similarly, ASA treatment was associated with substantial improvements in physical function outcome scores, enhancing patients' ability to perform daily activities. Patient-reported outcomes also indicated higher quality of life and functional status, with most patients experiencing high levels of satisfaction. Additionally, ASA's safety profile was favorable, with adverse events primarily mild to moderate in nature, including a few transient events such as knee stiffness and myalgias. This systematic review highlights ASA as an effective therapeutic option for knee osteoarthritis, although further studies focusing on long-term radiographic outcomes and mechanisms of action are recommended to fully establish its benefits and optimize treatment protocols.

Complications and opioid-prescribing patterns following genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation versus intra-articular injection: a matched cohort study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an emerging procedure used to relieve pain from severe knee osteoarthritis. While there have been rare reports of significant complications, their incidence has not been well established. The objective of this study was to examine complication rates at 30 and 90 days post treatment as well as characterize opioid-prescribing patterns before and after treatment.

METHODS

A large national database was queried to identify patients undergoing GNRFA from 2015 to 2022 and matched to control cohorts composed of patients receiving either intra-articular corticosteroid (CSI) or hyaluronic acid injection (HAI) of the knee. Complication rates at 30 and 90 days were analyzed. Opioid utilization was assessed in the 6 months before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Rates of infection (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), septic arthritis (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%, CI 1.3% to 2.7% vs 1.6%, CI 1.0% to 2.2%), pulmonary embolism (1.2%, CI 0.6% to 1.7% vs 1.3%, CI 1.1% to 2.5%), bleeding (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), seroma (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%) and thermal injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%) were not different between CSI and GNRFA cohorts at 30 days. Rate of swelling was significantly greater in the GNRFA cohort (9.4%, CI 7.6% to 10.4% vs 6.4%, CI 4.8% to 7.2%, p=0.003) at 30 days. At 90 days, rates of septic arthritis (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.3%, CI 0.08% to 0.7%), deep vein thrombosis (3.1%, CI 2.1% to 3.8% vs 3.1%, CI 2.2% to 3.9%), pulmonary embolism (1.5%, CI 0.9% to 2.1% vs 1.8%, CI 1.2% to 2.5%), and nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs <0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4%) were not significantly different.Between HAI versus GNRFA cohorts, no significant differences were seen in rates of infection (0.3%, CI 0.08% to 0.07% vs 0.7%, CI 0.3% to 1.2%), septic arthritis (0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6% vs 0.4%, CI 0.2% to 0.9%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%, CI 1.3% to 2.7% vs 1.9%, CI 1.2% to 2.7%), pulmonary embolism (1.5%, CI 0.9% to 2.2% vs 1.7%, CI 1.1% to 2.5%), bleeding (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), seroma (<0.1%, CI 0.03% to 0.4% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), swelling (14.0%, CI 11.6% to 15.1% vs 12.0%, CI 10.3% to 13.6%), and thermal injury (<0.1%, CI 0.03% to 0.4% vs <0.01%, CI 0.3% to 0.4%) at 30 days. Rates of infection (0.7%, CI 0.3% to 1.2% vs 1.4%, CI 0.9% to 2.1%), septic arthritis (0.3%, CI 0.1% to 0.8% vs 0.5%, CI 0.2% to 1.1%), deep vein thrombosis (3.6%, CI 2.6% to 4.4% vs 3.1%, CI 2.2% to 4.0%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%, CI 1.5% to 3.0% vs 2.1%, CI 1.4% to 3.0%) and nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5%) were not significantly different at 90 days.There were no significant differences in level of pretreatment opioid utilization although overall consumption in mean daily morphine equivalents was greater in the GNRFA cohort. Opioid utilization significantly increased in the first 30 days after ablation in patients with no prior opioid use compared to controls. In patients with some and chronic prior opioid use, opioid requirements were generally decreased in all treatment groups at 6 months with no clearly superior treatment in reducing opioid consumption.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that GNRFA possesses a safety profile similar to that of intra-articular injections although significant adverse events such as venous thromboembolism and septic arthritis may occur rarely. Although opioid utilization generally increased in the 30 days after ablation compared with intra-articular injection, similar reduction in opioid consumption at 6 months was seen in patients with prior opioid use in the ablation and control cohorts.

Efficacy of Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a gradual deterioration of articular cartilage characterized by pain and physical dysfunction. Although analgesic pharmacological agents are the first-line treatment for knee OA, they are not effective for all patients. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of an intra-articular injection treatment using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in reducing pain and improving functional ability.

RECENT FINDINGS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) provides an updated overview for the role of PRP in knee OA treatment. Ten articles, published between 2016 and 2023, met the inclusion criteria and compared PRP treatment to a placebo control at six-month follow-up. A total of 9,409 potential studies were identified from a review of four different databases: PubMed (n = 4595), Cochrane (n = 4252), VHL (n = 112), and OpenSigle (n = 450). After the titles and abstracts and inclusion and exclusion criteria were considered, a total of 10 studies were analyzed. Although a significant improvement among PRP-treated groups in some studies was found, there was variability such as where the aforementioned scores appeared to worsen and some only demonstrated trends. Overall, PRP may be a promising treatment for symptomatic knee OA. However, further research is necessary to determine the efficacy of PRP in treating knee OA, with specific considerations for times at follow-up, frequency and dosage of injections, and comorbidities, which were unaccounted for in this SR/MA.

9. Chronic knee pain

INTRODUCTION

Chronic knee pain is defined as pain that persists or recurs over 3 months. The most common is degenerative osteoarthritis (OA). This review represents a comprehensive description of the pathology, diagnosis, and treatment of OA of the knee.

METHODS

The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic knee pain was retrieved and summarized. A modified Delphi approach was used to formulate recommendations on interventional treatments.

RESULTS

Patients with knee OA commonly present with insidious, chronic knee pain that gradually worsens. Pain caused by knee OA is predominantly nociceptive pain, with occasional nociplastic and infrequent neuropathic characteristics occurring in a diseased knee. A standard musculoskeletal and neurological examination is required for the diagnosis of knee OA. Although typical clinical OA findings are sufficient for diagnosis, medical imaging may be performed to improve specificity. The differential diagnosis should exclude other causes of knee pain including bone and joint disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondylo- and other arthropathies, and infections. When conservative treatment fails, intra-articular injections of corticosteroids and radiofrequency (conventional and cooled) of the genicular nerves have been shown to be effective. Hyaluronic acid infiltrations are conditionally recommended. Platelet-rich plasma infiltrations, chemical ablation of genicular nerves, and neurostimulation have, at the moment, not enough evidence and can be considered in a study setting. The decision to perform joint-preserving and joint-replacement options should be made multidisciplinary.

CONCLUSIONS

When conservative measures fail to provide satisfactory pain relief, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended including psychological therapy, integrative treatments, and procedural options such as intra-articular injections, radiofrequency ablation, and surgery.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Aging Cartilage Regeneration: A Review

Cartilage degeneration is a key feature of aging and osteoarthritis, characterized by the progressive deterioration of joint function, pain, and limited mobility. Current treatments focus on symptom relief, not cartilage regeneration. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) offer a promising therapeutic option due to their capability to differentiate into chondrocytes, modulate inflammation, and promote tissue regeneration. This review explores the potential of MSCs for cartilage regeneration, examining their biological properties, action mechanisms, and applications in preclinical and clinical settings. MSCs derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and other sources can self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell types. In aging cartilage, they aid in tissue regeneration by secreting growth factors and cytokines that enhance repair and modulate immune responses. Recent preclinical studies show that MSCs can restore cartilage integrity, reduce inflammation, and improve joint function, although clinical translation remains challenging due to limitations such as cell viability, scalability, and regulatory concerns. Advancements in MSC delivery, including scaffold-based approaches and engineered exosomes, may improve therapeutic effectiveness. Potential risks, such as tumorigenicity and immune rejection, are also discussed, emphasizing the need for optimized treatment protocols and large-scale clinical trials to develop effective, minimally invasive therapies for cartilage regeneration.

Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Liposomal Intra-Articular Lubricant in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A First-in-Human Study

Background/Objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease that affects almost half the population at some point in their lives, causing pain and decreased functional capacity. New conservative treatment modalities are being proposed to provide symptomatic relief and delay surgical intervention. This study aimed at evaluating the safety of the novel liposomal boundary lubricant, injected intra-articularly in patients with moderate knee OA. Additionally, the effect on the functionality and life quality was assessed. Methods: Eighteen of the twenty screened subjects met inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. After receiving a single IA injection of AqueousJoint, patients were prospectively evaluated at baseline and at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Short Form Health Survey (SF12) and range of motion were also recorded. Results: The final analysis was conducted on 18 subjects. No adverse events related to the investigational product were observed in the study. No serious adverse events were observed at all. A significant decrease in pain was demonstrated at all time points vs. baseline (Friedman X2 = 35.08, p < 0.001). Significant improvement was demonstrated in KOOS pain, symptoms, sports, and ADL subscales (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite a relatively small sample, it was demonstrated that single IA AqueousJoint injection is a safe procedure, resulting in significant pain reduction, higher ADL score, and higher KOOS sport scores. The effects lasted up to 6 months.

Efficacy of intra-articular injection of combined platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) in knee degenerative joint disease: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial

PURPOSE

Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) represent promising options in the conservative treatment of early stages of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Although the combined use of these two compounds seems to have a synergistic effect in pre-clinical studies, few clinical trials compared the association of PRP and HA with PRP and HA alone. The aim of study is to evaluate the efficacy of combined intra-articular injections of PRP and HA in the treatment of mild to moderate knee OA, compared to PRP and HA alone.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-four patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo three intra-articular injections of either HA or PRP or the combination of PRP and HA with a two-week interval period. Patients were evaluated before treatment and after 3, 6, and 12 months using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Visual Analogue Scale and TEGNER Activity Scores.

RESULTS

All the treatments proved to be effective in reducing pain and improving joint function. The analysis of covariance did not show statistically significant differences among the three groups for any of the investigated outcome parameters after 6 and 12 months (WOMAC: p = 0.45 and p = 0.64, respectively). No significant differences were found in terms of adverse events (p = 0.49) and painkiller use (p = 0.28 and p = 0.56, respectively) among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

This multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial revealed that intra-articular injections of PRP + HA, PRP, or HA represent a safe and viable treatment with comparable efficacy in terms of pain relief and functional outcomes in mild to moderate knee OA.

Leukocytes Do Not Influence the Safety and Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used for the injection treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the role of leukocytes contained in PRP is controversial, with some preclinical studies suggesting detrimental effects and others emphasizing their contribution in secreting bioactive molecules.

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and effectiveness of leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) for the treatment of knee OA.

HYPOTHESIS

That leukocytes could influence results both in terms of adverse events and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

This double-blind randomized controlled trial included 132 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1-3 knee OA who were randomized to a 3-injection cycle of either LR-PRP or LP-PRP. Patients were prospectively assessed at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 months with subjective evaluations comprising the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index), the visual analog scale for pain, the EuroQol-visual analog scale, the EuroQol-5 dimensions, and the Tegner activity scale. Objective evaluations consisted of the IKDC objective score, active/passive range of motion, and circumference of the index and contralateral knees. Patient judgment of the treatment was recorded as well as adverse reactions and failures.

RESULTS

An overall improvement in subjective and objective outcomes was documented, with no differences between the 2 groups, except for the improvement in the IKDC subjective score at 2 months, which was greater for the LR-PRP group compared with the LP-PRP group (14.8 ± 14.8 vs 8.6 ± 13.3, respectively; P = .046), as well as for active (P = .021) and passive (P = .040) ROM of the index knee at 6 months, showing statistically significant higher values in the LP-PRP group; and for quadriceps circumference of the index (P = .042) and contralateral (P = .045) knees at 12 months, which were significantly greater in the LR-PRP group. The IKDC subjective score improved from 42.5 ± 17.6 at baseline to 55.6 ± 21.4 at 12 months for the LR-PRP group (P < .0005) and from 45.7 ± 16.4 to 55.3 ± 20.4 for the LP-PRP group (P = .001). No differences in terms of patient treatment judgment were observed at all follow-up time points. No severe adverse events related to the treatment were reported, but some mild adverse events related to the treatment were observed: 16 in the LR-PRP group and 17 in the LP-PRP group. Treatment failed in 5 patients in the LR-PRP group and 2 in the LP-PRP group.

CONCLUSION

This double-blind randomized controlled trial demonstrated that leukocytes did not affect the safety and efficacy of intra-articular PRP injections for the treatment of patients with knee OA. Both LR-PRP and LP-PRP demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes at all follow-up time points, without showing differences in subjective and objective outcomes or in adverse events and treatment failures.

REGISTRATION

NCT04187183 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Investigating the Safety And Efficacy of a Herbal Formulation on Knee Joint Function in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis

Background: Current treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) pain and stiffness have limitations, including adverse effects. Therefore, effective and safe complementary or alternative therapies are needed. Dietary supplement GJ 191, comprising Epimedium, Dioscorea, and Salvia miltiorrhiza extracts, may address this need. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated GJ 191 supplementation on knee OA symptoms. Seventy-two adults (40-75 years) with mild to moderate knee OA and mild to moderate knee pain were enrolled. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quality of Life questionnaire, knee joint range of motion, serum C-reactive protein, and rescue medication use were assessed. The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and stiffness scores were computed using KOOS scores. Results: Decreases in WOMAC pain scores were reported by both GJ 191 and placebo groups after 6 (-1.78 ± 2.71 and -1.34 ± 1.93, respectively; p < 0.01) and 12 (-2.31 ± 2.83 and -1.59 ± 2.69, respectively; p < 0.01) weeks, with no significant difference between groups. There were decreases in WOMAC stiffness scores for participants supplemented with GJ 191 by 0.53 ± 1.22 and 0.72 ± 1.46 (p ≤0.02) after 6 and 12 weeks, respectively, with respective decreases of 0.81 ± 1.51 and 0.75 ± 1.85 (p ≤0.03) for those on placebo. Significant improvements in current pain, as assessed by the Pain VAS, and bodily pain were reported by the GJ 191 group after 6 and 12 weeks, while the placebo group only reported significant improvements in these measures after 12 weeks. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in pain and stiffness scores between GJ 191 and placebo over the 12 weeks. While both groups reported improvements in WOMAC pain from baseline, improvements in current and bodily pain were experienced sooner with GJ 191 than placebo and were sustained over the study period. GJ 191 supplementation was safe and well tolerated. (CTR#: NCT04395547).

Evaluation of orthobiological ozonized platelet-rich plasma therapy post-arthroscopic suturing and lone partial meniscectomy in the treatment of meniscal tears within degenerative knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Knee joint osteoarthritis (OA)-related meniscal tears are still sometimes treated in centers by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), which is then followed by a solitary physical therapy regimen.

OBJECTIVE

The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intra-articular injection of ozonized platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid following arthroscopic suturing, and APM to treat meniscal tear degenerative type.

METHODS

In a randomized trial of prospective comparative research, 104 patients, all of whom had meniscal tears due to OA of the knee, were randomly divided into two groups. The participants in Group A (55 patients) were given intra-articular ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapeutics, following arthroscopic suturing of meniscal tear treatment (ASMT) of degenerative knee joint OA. Group B (49 patients) was prepared for APM alone. Both groups were followed by physical therapy and a follow up visit throughout 12, 24, and 36 months. The WOMAC and Lequesne scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

At every follow up visit for 6, 12, and 24, months, there was a significant decline in the mean of WOMAC and Lequesne scores in Groups A and B relative to baseline. Additionally, Group A significantly (P<0.0001) outperformed Group B at 12, 24, and 36 months for both Lequesne's and WOMAC scores. There were infection, stiffness, and widespread OA knee degeneration detected in Group B while no serious adverse effects were observed in Group A.

CONCLUSION

The study's findings demonstrated that physical and intra-articular orthobiological ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapies were more effective than APM in treating degenerative knee joint OA.

Minimally Invasive Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by articular cartilage degeneration and chronic inflammation, affecting one in five people over 40 years old. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of traditional and novel minimally invasive treatment options and role of artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline the diagnostic process of KOA. This literature review provides insights into the mechanisms of action, efficacy, complications, technical approaches, and recommendations to intra-articular injections (corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and plate rich plasma), genicular artery embolization (GAE), and genicular nerve ablation (GNA). Overall, there is mixed evidence to support the efficacy of the intra-articular injections that were covered in this study with varying degrees of supported recommendations through formal medical societies. While GAE and GNA are more novel therapeutic options, preliminary evidence supports their efficacy as a potential minimally invasive therapy for patients with moderate to severe KOA. Furthermore, there is evidentiary support for the use of AI to assist clinicians in the diagnosis and potential selection of treatment options for patients with KOA. In conclusion, there are many exciting advancements within the diagnostic and treatment space of KOA.

Interventional Radiology for Rheumatic Diseases

Imaging plays a key role in the management of rheumatological pathologies, also as guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures, as it can provide better accuracy and safety compared to palpation-guided interventions. Inflammatory and degenerative conditions nonresponsive to systemic treatment may benefit from intra-articular and periarticular administration of drugs, with therapeutic and symptomatic actions or providing a bridge for surgery. Desired effects include reduction of inflammation and pain and improvement of physical function of patients. Training and knowledge of indications, appropriate procedures, contraindications, and side effects are necessary to obtain maximum accuracy and safety in performing interventional procedures.

BRD2-specific inhibitor, BBC0403, inhibits the progression of osteoarthritis pathogenesis in osteoarthritis-induced C57BL/6 male mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The discovery of new bromo- and extra-terminal inhibitors presents new drugs to treat osteoarthritis (OA).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The new drug, BBC0403, was identified in the DNA-encoded library screening system by searching for compounds that target BRD (bromodomain-containing) proteins. The binding force with BRD proteins was evaluated using time-resolved fluorescence energy transfer (TR-FRET) and binding kinetics assays. Subsequently, in vitro and ex vivo analyses demonstrated the effects of the BRD2 inhibitor, BBC0403, on OA. For animal experiments, medial meniscus destabilization was performed to create a 12-week-old male C57BL/6 mouse model, and intra-articular (i.a.) injections were administered. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were then performed. The underlying mechanism was confirmed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using RNA-seq.

KEY RESULTS

TR-FRET and binding kinetics assays revealed that BBC0403 exhibited higher binding specificity for BRD2 compared to BRD3 and BRD4. The anti-OA effects of BBC0403 were tested at concentrations of 5, 10 and 20 μM (no cell toxicity in the range tested). The expression of catabolic factors, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation was reduced. Additionally, the i.a. injection of BBC0403 prevented OA cartilage degradation in mice. Finally, BBC0403 was demonstrated to suppress NF-κB and MAPK signalling pathways.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

This study demonstrated that BBC0403 is a novel BRD2-specific inhibitor and a potential i.a.-injectable therapeutic agent to treat OA.

Development of Proniosome Gel Formulation for CHIKV Infection

Given the increasing aging population and the rising prevalence of musculoskeletal diseases due to obesity and injury, urgent research is needed to formulate new treatment alternatives, as current options remain inadequate. Viruses can exacerbate arthritis and worsen symptoms in patients with pre-existing osteoarthritis. Over the past decade, the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) has emerged as a significant public health concern, especially in Asia and South America. Exploring natural products, such as berberine, has shown promise due to its anticatabolic, antioxidative, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, berberine's low stability and bioavailability limit its efficacy. We hypothesized that encapsulating berberine into a proniosome gel, known for its ease of preparation and stability, could enhance its bioavailability and efficacy when applied topically, potentially treating CHIKV infection. Our investigation focused on how varying berberine loads and selected excipients in the proniosome gel influenced its physical properties, stability, and skin permeability. We also examined the biological half-life of berberine in plasma upon topical administration in mice to assess the potential for controlled and sustained drug release. Additionally, we analyzed the antioxidant stress activity and cell viability of HaCaT keratinocytes and developed a lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cell culture model to evaluate anti-inflammatory effects using pro-inflammatory cytokines. Overall, the research aims to transform the treatment landscape for arthritis by leveraging berberine's therapeutic potential.

Management and Rehabilitative Treatment in Osteoarthritis with a Novel Physical Therapy Approach: A Randomized Control Study

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic degenerative disease characterized by progressive joint damage leading to significant disability. Although rehabilitative treatment methods for KOA have been widely implemented, the optimal integrated instrumental physical therapy approach remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the effect of Quantum Molecular Resonance (QMR) on pain reduction as the primary outcome and the functional improvement in activity daily living (ADL) as a secondary outcome. The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in an outpatient setting. Fifty-four (N = 54) patients were enrolled and then randomized into three groups according to a simple randomization list: Group 1 (intensive protocol, N = 22), Group 2 (extensive protocol, N = 21), and a Sham group (N = 11). Patients were evaluated over time with scales assessing pain and function. Treatment was performed with the QMR model electro-medical device, which generates alternating electric currents characterized by high frequency (4-64 MHz). The results showed that QMR had a positive effect with respect to the Sham group in terms of pain and function (p < 0.01), and intensive treatment was more effective than the extensive treatment in terms of "speed of response" to the treatment (p < 0.05). In conclusion, QMR in KOA could be effective in slowing the progression of clinical symptoms and improving patients' pain and functionality and thus quality of life. Future studies will be necessary to investigate further treatment algorithms and therapeutic associations with rehabilitative exercise.