Reducing Immunogenicity of Pegloticase With Concomitant Use of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients With Refractory Gout: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Urate-lowering therapy, serum urate, inflammatory biomarkers, and renal function in patients with gout following pegloticase discontinuation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Little is known about long-term clinical outcomes or urate-lowering (ULT) therapy use following pegloticase discontinuation. We examined ULT use, serum urate (SU), inflammatory biomarkers, and renal function following pegloticase discontinuation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of gout patients who discontinued pegloticase using the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry from 1/2016 to 6/2022. We defined discontinuation as a gap ≥ 12 weeks after last infusion. We examined outcomes beginning two weeks after last dose and identified ULT therapy following pegloticase discontinuation. We evaluated changes in lab values (SU, eGFR, CRP and ESR), comparing on- treatment (≤ 15 days of the second pegloticase dose) to post-treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 375 gout patients discontinuing pegloticase, median (IQR) laboratory changes following discontinuation were: SU: +2.4 mg/dL (0.0,6.3); eGFR: -1.9 mL/min (- 8.7,3.7); CRP: -0.8 mg/L (-12.8,0.0); and ESR: -4.0 mm/hr (-13.0,0.0). Therapy post-discontinuation included oral ULTs (86.0%), restarting pegloticase (4.5%), and no documentation of ULT (9.5%), excluding patients with multiple same-day prescriptions (n = 17). Oral ULTs following pegloticase were: 62.7% allopurinol, 34.1% febuxostat. The median (IQR) time to starting/restarting ULT was 92.0 days (55.0,173.0). Following ULT prescribing (≥ 30 days), only 51.0% of patients had SU < 6 mg/dL. Patients restarting pegloticase achieved a median SU of 0.9 mg/dL (IQR:0.2,9.7) and 58.3% had an SU < 6 mg/dL.

CONCLUSION

Pegloticase treats uncontrolled gout in patients with failed response to xanthine oxidase inhibitors, but among patients who discontinue, optimal treatment is unclear. Based on this analysis, only half of those starting another ULT achieved target SU. Close follow-up is needed to optimize outcomes after pegloticase discontinuation.

Intensive urate-lowering with pegloticase plus methotrexate co-therapy in uncontrolled gout patients with and without chronic kidney disease: A retrospective case series

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and gout commonly co-occur. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) in uncontrolled gout patients but antidrug antibodies limit urate-lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) co-administration increases pegloticase response rate and mitigates IR risk but CKD limits MTX use. This pooled case series examined pegloticase + MTX co-therapy in uncontrolled gout patients with and without CKD. Cases of pegloticase + MTX co-therapy in existing datasets were retrospectively examined. Baseline eGFR classified patients as CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or non-CKD (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Patient characteristics, treatment parameters, laboratory values, urate-lowering response rate (≥12 pegloticase infusions received and SU < 6 mg/dL just before infusion 12), and AEs were examined. Fifteen CKD (eGFR: 43.2 ± 11.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; SU: 8.6 ± 2.2 mg/dL), 27 non-CKD (eGFR: 82.9 ± 19.0 mL/min/1.73 m2; SU: 9.5 ± 1.7 mg/dL) patients were included. Comorbidity profiles were similar, but CKD patients were older (72.0 ± 9.9 vs 52.3 ± 14.3 years) and more often female (33.3% vs 7.4%). Treatment parameters were similar with 4-week MTX Run-in followed by mean of 14.7 ± 8.1 [CKD] vs 14.1 ± 7.1 [non-CKD] pegloticase infusions. However, CKD patients had lower MTX dose (14.8 ± 5.8 vs 19.3 ± 4.9 mg/week). Urate-lowering response was similar (92% vs 86%). eGFR increased during treatment in 60% of CKD (+11.5 ± 20.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, 87% stable/improved CKD-stage) and 44% of non-CKD (+4.2 ± 15.0 mL/min/1.73 m2) patients. AEs were similar (≥1 AE CKD: 53%, non-CKD: 67%; gout flare most-reported). One case each of pancytopenia and IR (mild) occurred in non-CKD patients. These real-world data show similar pegloticase + MTX efficacy in CKD and non-CKD patients. No new safety signals were identified, with most CKD patients showing renal function stability or improvement during therapy.

Pipeline Therapies for Gout

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite effective available treatments, gout management is often unsuccessful in getting patients to target serum urate goal and in managing flares in the setting of comorbidities. Studies addressing future treatment options for short- and long-term management are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

URAT-1 blocking agents have been helpful but have had limitations related to effects on renal function, lack of efficacy with renal impairment, and potential to increase renal stones. Dotinurad may function in the setting of decreased renal function. Arhalofenate has anti-URAT-1 activity and may also blunt gout flares. A new xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI), tigulixostat, is under study. New uricase treatments manufactured in combination with agents that can reduce immunogenicity may make uricase treatment simpler. A unique strategy of inhibiting gut uricase may offer the benefits of avoiding systemic absorption. For gout flares, IL-1β inhibitor studies in progress include different dosing schedules. Dapansutrile, an oral agent under investigation, inhibits activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and may be an effective anti-inflammatory. New treatments for gout that are under study may work in the setting of comorbidities, simplify management, utilize new mechanisms, or have reduced side effects.

Emerging Urate-Lowering Drugs and Pharmacologic Treatment Strategies for Gout: A Narrative Review

Hyperuricemia with consequent monosodium urate crystal deposition leads to gout, characterized by painful, incapacitating inflammatory arthritis flares that are also associated with increased cardiovascular event and related mortality risk. This narrative review focuses on emerging pharmacologic urate-lowering treatment (ULT) and management strategies in gout. Undertreated, gout can progress to palpable tophi and joint damage. In oral ULT clinical trials, target serum urate of < 6.0 mg/dL can be achieved in ~ 80-90% of subjects, with flare burden reduction by 1-2 years. However, real-world ULT results are far less successful, due to both singular patient nonadherence and prescriber undertreatment, particularly in primary care, where most patients are managed. Multiple dose titrations commonly needed to optimize first-line allopurinol ULT monotherapy, and substantial potential toxicities and other limitations of approved, marketed oral monotherapy ULT drugs, promote hyperuricemia undertreatment. Common gout comorbidities with associated increased mortality (e.g., moderate-severe chronic kidney disease [CKD], type 2 diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, heart failure) heighten ULT treatment complexity and emphasize unmet needs for better and more rapid clinically significant outcomes, including attenuated gout flare burden. The gout drug armamentarium will be expanded by integrating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors with uricosuric and anti-inflammatory properties as well as clinically indicated antidiabetic, nephroprotective, and/or cardioprotective effects. The broad ULT developmental pipeline is loaded with multiple uricosurics that selectively target uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1). Evolving ULT approaches include administering selected gut anaerobic purine degrading bacteria (PDB), modulating intestinal urate transport, and employing liver-targeted xanthine oxidoreductase mRNA knockdown. Last, emerging measures to decrease the immunogenicity of systemically administered recombinant uricases should simplify treatment regimens and further improve outcomes in managing the most severe gout phenotypes.

Pegloticase co-administered with high MW polyethylene glycol effectively reduces PEG-immunogenicity and restores prolonged circulation in mouse

The interactions between polymers and the immune system remains poorly controlled. In some instances, the immune system can produce antibodies specific to polymer constituents. Indeed, roughly half of pegloticase patients without immunomodulation develop high titers of anti-PEG antibodies (APA) to the PEG polymers on pegloticase, which then quickly clear the drug from circulation and render the gout treatment ineffective. Here, using pegloticase as a model drug, we show that addition of high molecular weight (MW) free (unconjugated) PEG to pegloticase allows us to control the immunogenicity and mitigates APA induction in mice. Compared to pegloticase mixed with saline, mice repeatedly dosed with pegloticase containing different MW or amount of free PEG possessed 4- to 12- fold lower anti-PEG IgG, and 6- to 10- fold lower anti-PEG IgM, after 3 rounds of pegloticase dosed every 2 weeks. The markedly reduced APA levels, together with competitive inhibition by free PEG, restored the prolonged circulation of pegloticase to levels observed in APA-naïve animals. In contrast, mice with pegloticase-induced APA eliminated nearly all pegloticase from the circulation within just four hours post-injection. These results support the growing literature demonstrating free PEG may effectively suppress drug-induced APA, which in turn may offer sustained therapeutic benefits without requiring broad immunomodulation. We also showed free PEG effectively blocked the PEGylated protein from binding with cells expressing PEG-specific B cell receptors. It provides a template of how we may be able to tune the interactions and immunogenicity of other polymer-modified therapeutics. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A major challenge with engineering materials for drug delivery is their interactions with the immune system. For instance, our body can produce high levels of anti-PEG antibodies (APA). Unfortunately, the field currently lack tools to limit immunostimulation or overcome pre-existing anti-PEG antibodies, without using broad immunosuppression. Here, we showed that simply introducing free PEG into a clinical formulation of PEG-uricase can effectively limit induction of anti-PEG antibodies, and restore their prolonged circulation upon repeated dosing. Our work offers a readily translatable method to safely and effectively restore the use PEG-drugs in patients with PEG-immunity, and provides a template to use unconjugated polymers with low immunogenicity to regulate interactions with the immune system for other polymer-modified therapeutics.

Mechanisms and rationale for uricase use in patients with gout

Xanthine oxidase inhibitors such as allopurinol and febuxostat have been the mainstay urate-lowering therapy (ULT) for treating hyperuricaemia in patients with gout. However, not all patients receiving oral ULT achieve the target serum urate level, in part because some patients cannot tolerate, or have actual or misconceived contraindications to, their use, mainly due to comorbidities. ULT dosage is also limited by formularies and clinical inertia. This failure to sufficiently lower serum urate levels can lead to difficult-to-treat or uncontrolled gout, usually due to poorly managed and/or under-treated gout. In species other than humans, uricase (urate oxidase) converts urate to allantoin, which is more soluble in urine than uric acid. Exogenic uricases are an exciting therapeutic option for patients with gout. They can be viewed as enzyme replacement therapy. Uricases are being used to treat uncontrolled gout, and can achieve rapid reduction of hyperuricaemia, dramatic resolution of tophi, decreased chronic joint pain and improved quality of life. Availability, cost and uricase immunogenicity have limited their use. Uricases could become a leading choice in severe and difficult-to-treat gout as induction and/or debulking therapy (that is, for lowering of the urate pool) to be followed by chronic oral ULT. This Review summarizes the evidence regarding available uricases and those in the pipeline, their debulking effect and their outcomes related to gout and beyond.

Pegloticase efficacy and safety in kidney transplant recipients; results of the phase IV, open-label PROTECT clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients have a high prevalence and severity of gout. Pegloticase (pegylated recombinant uricase) rapidly metabolizes serum uric acid (sUA), and its efficacy is not impacted by kidney function.

METHODS

This open-label, Phase 4 trial (PROTECT NCT04087720) examined safety and efficacy of pegloticase in 20 participants with KT > 1 year prior to enrollment and with uncontrolled gout (sUA ≥7 mg/dL, intolerance/inefficacy to urate lowering therapy, and ≥1 of the following: tophi, chronic gouty arthritis, ≥2 flares in past year) and functioning KT (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) on stable immunosuppression therapy.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was sUA response during month 6 (sUA < 6 mg/dL for ≥80% of time). The study enrolled 20 participants (mean ± SD); age: 53.9 ± 10.9 years, time since KT: 14.7 ± 6.9 years, sUA: 9.4 ± 1.5 mg/dL, gout duration: 8.4 ± 11.6 years; all on ≥2 stable doses of immunosuppression agents. Pegloticase (8 mg intravenous every 2 weeks) in KT recipients with uncontrolled gout showed a high response rate of 89% (16/18 responders). Two participants discontinued treatment solely due to COVID-19 concerns prior to month 6 were not included in the primary analysis. Pegloticase exposures were higher than those historically observed with pegloticase monotherapy, and no anaphylaxis or infusion reaction events occurred during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This improved response rate to pegloticase in the KT population reflects observations from other trials and reports on immunomodulation with pegloticase. As the KT population has a high prevalence of gout and limitations with oral urate lowering medication options, these findings suggest a potential option for uncontrolled gout therapy in KT participants.

Management of Patients with Gout and Kidney Disease: A Review of Available Therapies and Common Missteps

Gout, a common form of inflammatory arthritis, is characterized by deposition of monosodium urate crystals in articular and periarticular tissues. Repeated flares of gout cause joint damage as well as significant health care utilization and decreased quality of life. Patients with CKD have a higher prevalence of gout. Treating Patients with CKD and gout is challenging because of the lack of quality data to guide management in this specific population. This often leads to suboptimal treatment of patients with gout and impaired renal function because concerns regarding the efficacy and safety of available gout therapies in this population often result in significant interphysician variability in treatment regimens and dosages. Acute gout flares are treated with various agents, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, glucocorticoids, and-more recently-IL-1 inhibitors. These medications can also be used as prophylaxis if urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is initiated. While these drugs can be used in patients with gout and CKD, there are often factors that complicate treatment, such as the numerous medication interactions involving colchicine and the effect of glucocorticoids on common comorbidities, such as diabetes and hypertension. ULT is recommended to treat recurrent flares, tophaceous deposits, and patients with moderate-to-severe CKD with a serum urate goal of <6 mg/dl recommended to prevent flares. While many misconceptions exist around the risks of using urate-lowering agents in patients with CKD, there is some evidence that these medications can be used safely in Patients with renal impairment. Additional questions exist as to whether gout treatment is indicated for Patients on RRT. Furthermore, there are conflicting data on whether ULT can affect renal function and cardiovascular disease in patients. All of these factors contribute to the unique challenges physicians face when treating patients with gout and CKD.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Efficacy and Safety Study of Methotrexate to Increase Response Rates in Patients With Uncontrolled Gout Receiving Pegloticase: 12-Month Findings

OBJECTIVE

To assess 12-month safety and efficacy of pegloticase + methotrexate (MTX) versus pegloticase + placebo (PBO) cotherapy in a PBO-controlled, double-blind trial (A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, efficacy and safety study of methotrexate to increase response rates in patients with uncontrolled gout receiving pegloticase [MIRROR RCT]).

METHODS

Patients with uncontrolled gout (serum urate level [SU] ≥7 mg/dl, oral urate-lowering therapy failure or intolerance, and presence of one or more gout symptoms [one or more tophi, two or more flares in 12 months, gouty arthropathy]) were randomized 2:1 to receive pegloticase (8-mg infusion every 2 weeks) with blinded MTX (oral 15 mg/week) or PBO for 52 weeks. Efficacy end points included proportion of responders (SU level <6 mg/dl for ≥80% of examined month) in the intent-to-treat population (ITT) (all randomized patients) during month 6 (primary end point), month 9, and month 12; proportion with resolution of one or more tophi (ITT); mean SU reduction (ITT); and time to SU-monitoring pegloticase discontinuation. Safety was evaluated via adverse event reporting and laboratory values.

RESULTS

Month 12 response rate was significantly higher in patients cotreated with MTX (60.0% [60 of 100] vs. 30.8% [16 of 52]; difference: 29.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2%-44.9%], P = 0.0003), with fewer SU discontinuations (22.9% [22 of 96] vs. 63.3% [31 of 49]). Complete resolution of one or more tophi occurred in 53.8% (28 of 52) versus 31.0% (9 of 29) of MTX versus PBO patients at week 52 (difference: 22.8% [95% CI: 1.2%-44.4%], P = 0.048), more than at week 24 (34.6% [18 of 52] vs. 13.8% [4 of 29]). Consistent with observations through month 6, pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity findings showed increased exposure and lower immunogenicity of pegloticase when administered with MTX, with an otherwise similar safety profile. No infusion reactions occurred after 24 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Twelve-month MIRROR RCT data further support MTX cotherapy with pegloticase. Tophi resolution continued to increase through week 52, suggesting continued therapeutic benefit beyond month 6 for a favorable treatment effect.

Pegloticase in Uncontrolled Gout: The Infusion Nurse Perspective

Infused biologics, such as pegloticase, are a core component of managing uncontrolled gout, which is increasing in prevalence. Pegloticase is often the last line of therapy for patients with uncontrolled gout; therefore, achieving a successful course of treatment is critical. The infusion nurse's role in patient education, serum uric acid monitoring, and patient medication compliance is essential for ensuring patient safety and maximizing the number of patients who benefit from a full treatment course of pegloticase. Infusion nurses are on the front lines with patients and need to be educated on potential negative effects associated with the medications they infuse, such as infusion reactions, as well as risk management methods like patient screening and monitoring. Further, patient education provided by the infusion nurse plays a large role in empowering the patient to become their own advocate during pegloticase treatment. This educational overview includes a model patient case for pegloticase monotherapy, as well as one for pegloticase with immunomodulation and a step-by-step checklist for infusion nurses to refer to throughout the pegloticase infusion process. A video abstract is available for this article at http://links.lww.com/JIN/A105.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic refractory gout through meta-analysis

Gout is the most common arthritis that affects more than 2% of adults in developed countries. 3% to 4% of gout is chronic refractory gout. Conventional treatments are considered invalid. A new drug, pegloticase is used to treat chronic refractory gout, and there are still many questions about efficacy and safety. We searched PubMed, web of science, and the Cochrane Library. Preprints and references of related literature were also considered. Related efficacy and safety indicators were statistically analyzed by Review Manager 5.4 to conduct meta-analysis. A total of one article and one clinical trial were included. Pegloticase is able to reduce serum uric acid and reduce tender joints, thereby improving joint function. But pegloticase has more adverse events. Pegloticase can be used to treat chronic refractory gout. However, Pegloticase has a higher risk of adverse events. Considering the efficacy and safety, the scope of clinical applications of pegloticase can be further widened in patients in good medical condition.

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Methotrexate to Increase Response Rates in Patients with Uncontrolled Gout Receiving Pegloticase: Primary Efficacy and Safety Findings

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of pegloticase plus methotrexate (MTX) versus pegloticase plus placebo cotreatment for uncontrolled gout in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

METHODS

This study included adults with uncontrolled gout, defined as serum urate ≥7 mg/dl, oral urate-lowering therapy failure or intolerance, and presence of ongoing gout symptoms including ≥1 tophus, ≥2 flares in the past 12 months, or gouty arthritis. Key exclusion criteria included MTX contraindication, current immunosuppressant use, G6PDH deficiency, and estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 ml/minute/1.73 m² . Patients were randomized 2:1 to 52 weeks of pegloticase (8 mg biweekly) with either oral MTX (15 mg/week) or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of treatment responders during month 6 (defined as serum urate <6 mg/dl for ≥80% of visits during weeks 20-24). Efficacy was evaluated in all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), and safety was evaluated in all patients receiving ≥1 blinded MTX or placebo dose.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were randomized, 100 to receive pegloticase plus MTX, 52 to receive pegloticase plus placebo. Significantly higher treatment response occurred during month 6 in the MTX group versus the placebo group (71.0% [71 of 100 patients] versus 38.5% [20 of 52 patients], respectively; between-group difference 32.3% [95% confidence interval 16.3%, 48.3%]) (P < 0.0001 for between-group difference). During the first 6 months of pegloticase plus MTX or pegloticase plus placebo treatment, 78 (81.3%) of 96 MTX patients versus 47 (95.9%) of 49 placebo patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE), most commonly gout flare (64 [66.7%] of 96 MTX patients and 34 [69.4%] of 49 placebo patients). Reports of AEs and serious AEs were comparable between groups, but the infusion reaction rate was considerably lower with MTX cotherapy (4.2% [4 of 96 MTX patients, including 1 patient who had anaphylaxis]) than with placebo cotherapy (30.6% [15 of 49 placebo patients, 0 who had anaphylaxis]) (P < 0.001). Antidrug antibody positivity was also lower in the MTX group.

CONCLUSION

MTX cotherapy markedly increased pegloticase response rate over placebo (71.0% versus 38.5%) during month 6 with no new safety signals. These findings verify higher treatment response rate, lower infusion reaction incidence, and lower immunogenicity when pegloticase is coadministered with MTX.

Novel Development of Nanoparticles-A Promising Direction for Precise Tumor Management

Although the clinical application of nanoparticles is still limited by biological barriers and distribution, with the deepening of our understanding of nanoparticles over the past decades, people are gradually breaking through the previous limitations in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors, providing novel strategies for clinical decision makers. The transition of nanoparticles from passive targeting to active tumor-targeting by abundant surface-modified nanoparticles is also a development process of precision cancer treatment. Different particles can be used as targeted delivery tools of antitumor drugs. The mechanism of gold nanoparticles inducing apoptosis and cycle arrest of tumor cells has been discovered. Moreover, the unique photothermal effect of gold nanoparticles may be widely used in tumor therapy in the future, with less side effects on surrounding tissues. Lipid-based nanoparticles are expected to overcome the blood-brain barrier due to their special characteristics, while polymer-based nanoparticles show better biocompatibility and lower toxicity. In this paper, we discuss the development of nanoparticles in tumor therapy and the challenges that need to be addressed.

Coadministration of Immunosuppressant Treatments With Pegloticase in the Context of Solid-Organ Transplantation and Gout: A Case Report

Refractory gout can be treated with infusions of pegloticase, which metabolizes uric acid into a product readily excreted in urine. Antidrug antibodies often develop, leading to reduced efficacy and potential infusion reactions. The concomitant administration of immunosuppressive agents has been suggested as a means of mitigating the effects of drug-related immunogenicity, rendering treatment more tolerable, and resulting in better outcomes. This report presents cases of 2 patients with tophaceous gout, each having previously undergone a solid-organ transplant, each taking immunosuppressants to prevent organ rejection, and each successfully treated with pegloticase. Although data from randomized controlled studies are needed, these cases suggest that it may be beneficial to coadminister an immunosuppressive medication to extend drug persistence with pegloticase in the management of refractory gout. This approach could allow patients to receive long-term treatment, resulting in improved patient outcomes.

Community Practice Experiences with a Variety of Immunomodulatory Agents Co-Administered with Pegloticase for the Treatment of Uncontrolled Gout

Objective

Patients with uncontrolled/refractory gout have heavy disease burden, but few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU), but anti-drug antibodies can limit treatment efficacy. Evidence supports immunomodulator-pegloticase co-administration to increase sustained urate-lowering rates, but published cases are limited. This study investigated experience with pegloticase-immunomodulation co-therapy at two community rheumatology practices.

Methods

Patients initiating pegloticase with immunomodulation in 2017 or later were included. Patient/treatment characteristics and proportion of responders (≥ 12 pegloticase infusions, SU < 6 mg/dl at infusion-12) were examined. Patients on therapy at data collection with < 12 infusions were excluded from response analyses. eGFR before and after therapy was examined.

Results

Thirty-four patients (79% male, 62.4 ± 16.3 years) with uncontrolled gout (SU = 9.1 ± 2.0 mg/dl, 91% tophaceous) were included. Most-reported comorbidities were hypertension (76%), obesity (71%), osteoarthritis (68%), and CKD (47%). Pre-therapy eGFR was 65.4 ± 25.2 ml/min/1.73 m² (41% eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²). All patients initiated immunomodulation before (5.3 ± 3.0 weeks, n = 32) or at (n = 2) first pegloticase infusion. Subcutaneous methotrexate (15.4 ± 4.9 mg/week, n = 20), oral methotrexate (15.3 ± 3.6 mg/week, n = 9), mycophenolate mofetil (1000 mg/day, n = 3), and azathioprine (100 mg/day, n = 2) were administered. Patients received 14.6 ± 7.1 infusions over 28.5 ± 14.9 weeks. Overall response rate was 89%, ranging among immunomodulators (subcutaneous methotrexate: 93%, oral methotrexate: 89%, mycophenolate mofetil: 100%, azathioprine: 50%). On average, eGFR increased during therapy (+ 10.3 ± 16.9 ml/min/1.73 m²), with CKD stability/improvement in 85%. Nineteen patients (56%) experienced gout flares. No infusion reactions or infections were noted. No new safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions

These real-world findings provide further support for increased pegloticase response rates when co-treatment with immunomodulating therapy is used.

Patients with gout that does not respond to oral urate-lowering therapies have heavy disease burden and few treatment options. Pegloticase lowers serum urate levels (SU) and resolves tophi, but anti-drug antibodies can limit urate-lowering efficacy duration. Evidence increasingly supports co-administering an immunomodulator with pegloticase to increase the proportion of patients with sustained urate-lowering response. However, there are few published cases from real-world clinical practice. This study examined treatment with pegloticase + immunomodulation at two community rheumatology practices. Patients who began treatment with pegloticase and an immunomodulator in 2017 or later were included. The proportion of patients with sustained urate-lowering response (≥ 12 infusions received, SU < 6 mg/dl at infusion 12) was investigated. Renal function before and after therapy was also examined. Thirty-four patients were included. Before treatment, SU averaged 9.1 mg/dl and most-reported comorbidities were hypertension (76%), obesity (71%), osteoarthritis (68%), and chronic kidney disease (47%). All patients began using an immunomodulator before or at first pegloticase infusion (subcutaneous methotrexate [20 patients], oral methotrexate [9 patients], mycophenolate mofetil [3 patients], and azathioprine [2 patients]). On average, 14.6 infusions were administered over 28.5 weeks and overall response rate was 89%. Response rate varied among different immunomodulators: subcutaneous methotrexate: 93%, oral methotrexate: 89%, mycophenolate mofetil: 100%, azathioprine: 50%. On average, kidney function improved, with chronic kidney disease stage stability/improvement in 85% of patients. Nineteen patients (56%) experienced gout flares. No infusion reactions or infections were noted and no new safety concerns were identified. These real-world findings provide further support for administering immunomodulation as co-therapy to pegloticase.

A multicentre, efficacy and safety study of methotrexate to increase response rates in patients with uncontrolled gout receiving pegloticase (MIRROR): 12-month efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic findings during long-term extension of an open-label study

Background

Publications suggest immunomodulation co-therapy improves responder rates in uncontrolled/refractory gout patients undergoing pegloticase treatment. The MIRROR open-label trial showed a 6-month pegloticase + methotrexate co-therapy responder rate of 79%, compared to an established 42% pegloticase monotherapy responder rate. Longer-term efficacy/safety data are presented here.

Methods

Uncontrolled gout patients (serum urate [SU] ≥ 6 mg/dL and SU ≥ 6 mg/dL despite urate-lowering therapy [ULT], ULT intolerance, or functionally-limiting tophi) were included. Patients with immunocompromised status, G6PD deficiency, severe kidney disease, or methotrexate contraindication were excluded. Oral methotrexate (15 mg/week) and folic acid (1 mg/day) were administered 4 weeks before and during pegloticase therapy. Twelve-month responder rate (SU < 6 mg/dL for ≥ 80% during month 12), 52-week change from baseline in SU, and extended safety were examined. Efficacy analyses were performed for patients receiving ≥ 1 pegloticase infusion. Pharmacokinetics (PK)/anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were examined and related to efficacy/safety findings.

Results

Fourteen patients were included (all male, 49.3 ± 8.7 years, 13.8 ± 7.4-year gout history, pre-therapy SU 9.2 ± 2.5 mg/dL). Three patients were non-responders and discontinued study treatment before 24 weeks, one patient exited the study per protocol at 24 weeks (enrolled prior to treatment extension amendment), and 10 remained in the study through week 52. Of the 10, 8 completed 52 weeks of pegloticase + methotrexate and were 12-month responders. The remaining two discontinued pegloticase + methotrexate at week 24 (met treatment goals) and stayed in the study under observation (allopurinol prescribed at physicians’ discretion); one remained a responder at 12 months. At 52 weeks, change from baseline in SU was − 8.2 ± 4.1 mg/dL (SU 1.1 ± 2.4 mg/dL, n = 10). Gout flares were common early in treatment but progressively decreased while on therapy (weeks 1–12, 13/14 [92.9%]; weeks 36–52, 2/8 [25.0%]). One patient recovered from sepsis (serious AE). Two non-responders developed high ADA titers; fewer patients had trough concentrations (C_min) below the quantitation limit (BQL), and the median C_min was higher (1.03 µg/mL vs. BQL) than pegloticase monotherapy trials.

Conclusions

Pegloticase + methotrexate co-therapy was well-tolerated over 12 months, with sustained SU lowering, progressive gout flare reduction, and no new safety concerns. Antibody/PK findings suggest methotrexate attenuates ADA formation, coincident with higher treatment response rates.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03635957. Registered on 17 August 2018.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02865-z.

A glance into the future of gout

Gout is characterized by monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposits in and within joints. These deposits result from persistent hyperuricaemia and most typically lead to recurrent acute inflammatory episodes (gout flares). Even though some aspects of gout are well characterized, uncertainties remain; this upcoming decade should provide further insights into many of these uncertainties. Synovial fluid analysis allows for the identification of MSU crystals and unequivocal diagnosis. Non-invasive methods for diagnosis are being explored, such as Raman spectroscopy and imaging modalities. Both ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) allow the detection of MSU crystals; this not only provides a mean of diagnosis, but also has furthered gout knowledge defining the presence of a preclinical deposition in asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. Scientific consensus establishes the beginning of gout as the beginning of symptoms (usually the first flare), but the concept is currently under review. For effective long-term gout management, the main goal is to promote crystal dissolution treatment by reducing serum urate below 6 mg/dL (or 5 mg/dL if faster crystal dissolution is required). Current urate-lowering therapies' (ULTs) options are limited, with allopurinol and febuxostat being widely available, and probenecid, benzbromarone, and pegloticase available in some regions. New xanthine oxidase inhibitors and, especially, uricosurics inhibiting urate transporter URAT1 are under development; it is probable that the new decade will see a welcomed increase in the gout therapeutic armamentarium. Cardiovascular and renal comorbidities are common in gout patients. Studies determining whether optimal treatment of gout will positively impact these comorbidities are currently lacking, but will hopefully be forthcoming. Overall, the single change that will most impact gout management is greater uptake of international rheumatology society recommendations. Innovative strategies, such as nurse-led interventions based on these recommendations have recently demonstrated treatment success for people with gout.

Enhancing the Response Rate to Recombinant Uricases in Patients with Gout

Refractory, or uncontrolled, gout is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory arthropathy resulting from continued urate deposition after failed attempts to lower serum uric acid below the therapeutic threshold with oral urate-lowering therapies such as allopurinol and febuxostat. Recombinant uricase is increasingly being used to treat refractory gout; however, the immunogenicity of uricase-based therapies has limited the use of these biologic therapies. Antidrug antibodies against biologic therapies, including uricase and PEGylated uricase, can lead to loss of urate-lowering response, increased risk of infusion reactions, and subsequent treatment failure. However, co-therapy with an immunomodulator can attenuate antidrug antibody development, potentially increasing the likelihood of sustained urate lowering, therapy course completion, and successful treatment outcomes. This review summarizes evidence surrounding the use of immunomodulation as co-therapy with recombinant uricases.

Update on gout management: what is old and what is new

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The global burden of gout is rising, as are the prevalence of associated comorbidities, all-cause mortality and societal costs. In this review, we discuss recent advances in epidemiology and treatment strategies for gout.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic factors and obesity are prominent contributors to hyperuricemia and gout, while dietary factors contribute to less variance in serum urate, though can still have some contribution to population attributable risk. A consensus statement by the Gout, Hyperuricemia and Crystal-Associated Disease Network outlined appropriate terminology regarding gout, which will aid in communication about various aspects of the disease. The 2020 American College of Rheumatology gout guideline offers comprehensive evidence-based recommendations for the management of hyperuricemia using urate-lowering therapy, prophylaxis when initiating urate-lowering therapy, treatment of gout flare and adjunctive management strategies. There is improved understanding of risk factors for allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome and well tolerated use of allopurinol in chronic kidney disease. Trial data have provided new insights regarding cardiovascular risk with febuxostat. Several new drug therapies are being tested for both urate-lowering efficacy and gout flare management.

SUMMARY

Although there have been significant advances in understanding of risk factors and treatment approaches, gout remains suboptimally managed. There is substantial need for improving gout management efforts and gout education among patients and clinicians.

Effect of Leflunomide on Pegloticase Response Rate in Patients with Uncontrolled Gout: A Retrospective Study

Background

Pegloticase, a PEGylated uricase for uncontrolled gout, rapidly lowers serum urate (SU). Not all patients complete a full-therapy course because anti-pegloticase antibodies can develop, causing efficacy loss and infusion reactions. The literature and clinical trial data indicate that methotrexate co-administration markedly improves pegloticase response rates from the established monotherapy response rate of 42%. Unfortunately, methotrexate use is restricted by kidney disease, which is often present in uncontrolled gout patients. Leflunomide is less restricted in patients with renal dysfunction. This study examined the treatment response rate of pegloticase co-administered with leflunomide.

Methods

Patients co-treated with pegloticase (8 mg biweekly infusion) and oral leflunomide (20 mg/day) were included. Patient/treatment characteristics and safety parameters (adverse events [AEs], laboratory parameters) were examined. Pre-infusion prophylaxis was administered (day of infusion: IV solumedrol, night before and morning of infusion: oral fexofenadine or diphenhydramine). Patients were considered treatment responders if ≥ 12 pegloticase infusions were administered and pre-infusion SU < 6 mg/dl at infusion-12.

Results

Ten patients (five male, 72.7 ± 12.5 years) were included. The most common comorbidities were chronic kidney disease (90%), hypertension (70%), diabetes mellitus (60%), obesity (60%), and congestive heart failure (50%). Baseline SU was 7.1 ± 2.4 mg/dl and nine patients (90%) had subcutaneous tophi noted. Seven patients (70%) met responder criteria, receiving 26.6 ± 14.0 infusions (range 13–55) with a pre-infusion-12 SU of 0.9 ± 1.5 mg/dl. The three non-responders received < 12 infusions because of unrelated AEs or loss of follow-up. Three patients (30%) experienced AEs. One had unrelated cardiac disease worsening and three gout flares, one had a pre-infusion solumedrol reaction (wooziness/loss of consciousness), and one had two mild, transient increases in liver enzymes.

Conclusions

This study supports leflunomide as co-therapy to pegloticase in uncontrolled gout patients. Heterogeneity and high comorbidity burden in uncontrolled gout patients makes having a variety of immunomodulators options important.

What's new on the front-line of gout pharmacotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis affecting millions of people around the world. Painful flares and tophaceous deposits can be debilitating, reducing quality of life among those affected and putting strain on health care systems.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the treatment of gout for flare pain management and lowering serum urate. Firstline agents are discussed with emphasis on emerging evidence. Novel therapies are also covered.

EXPERT OPINION

Lifestyle modifications form a part of gout prevention. Regarding gout flare pharmacotherapy NSAIDs, colchicine and glucocorticoids are first line agents. The IL-1β antagonists also are highly effective for arresting flares but their cost-effectiveness render them as salvage therapies. Allopurinol is an agent of first choice for urate lowering therapy (ULT). In South East Asian and Black populations screening for HLA*B58:01 mutation is a cost-effective approach to decrease the occurrence of the rare but potentially very serious allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS.). Febuxostat is another efficacious urate lowering therapy but it has received U.S. FDA black box warning for cardiovascular safety and careful consideration is warranted before its initiation in patients with high cardiovascular risk. Novel uricosurics are a class for continued drug development; verinurad and arhalofenate are agents with future promise. For patients with recalcitrant gout, pegloticase is another effective option in the rheumatologist's armamentarium. Its immunogenicity significantly threatens the achievement of sustained urate lowering responses. Abrogating pegloticase's immunogenicity with immunomodulatory co-therapy may lend to sustained efficacy.

Treatment advances in gout

The purpose of gout treatment is to alleviate symptoms of flares, prevent flares from recurring by lowering serum urate, and minimize structural joint damage and functional impairment. In recent years, several new medications to treat gout have been developed, and novel agents continue to be investigated, in addition to several long-established treatments. Although a number of effective therapies are available, optimal management and outcomes are frequently not achieved due to physician under prescribing of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) and poor adherence with therapy when it is prescribed. This article reviews recent developments in the management of gout with reference to recently published clinical guidelines, outlines some important questions regarding the safety and efficacy of particular agents, and remaining gaps in our knowledge about the most effective strategies for using currently available treatments.