1
|
Jaecker V, Hahn F, Steinmeier A, Stöckle U, Märdian S. [Concept for the treatment of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures]. Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb) 2024:10.1007/s00113-023-01405-x. [PMID: 38180491 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-023-01405-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Due to demographic changes and increased survival rates of total hip arthroplasties, the incidence of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures is increasing. The current treatment concept requires accurate preoperative planning. Besides patient-related risk factors, fracture type, prosthesis stability, and bone quality influence whether osteosynthesis or a revision arthroplasty is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Jaecker
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
- Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland
| | - Fabienne Hahn
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Annika Steinmeier
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Ulrich Stöckle
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Sven Märdian
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bartsch A, Krenn P, Lubberts B, Morgenstern M, Pagenstert G, Clauss M. Management of acute periprosthetic knee infection: a comparison of arthroscopic and open debridement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:4309-4316. [PMID: 36735051 PMCID: PMC10293353 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04782-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In acute periprosthetic knee infections, debridement and implant retention (DAIR) is the preferred treatment prior to one- and two-stage revisions. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of arthroscopic and open debridement of infected primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA). MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed clinical, laboratory, and antibiotic treatment data, collected in patients with periprosthetic knee infection treated with DAIR at a Swiss Level 1 orthopedic and trauma center over a 10-year period between January 2005 and May 2015. Inclusion criteria were primary total knee arthroplasty and early postoperative or acute hematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The primary endpoint was the need for further revision surgery due to persistent infection. The secondary endpoint was the prosthesis salvage in further infection surgeries. RESULTS Forty-two patients with 44 acute or hematogenous periprosthetic knee infections were included. We recorded 20 recurrent infections (45%) in our study population: 10 (77%) out of 13 in the arthroscopic DAIR group and 10 (32%) out of 31 in the open DAIR group. Two-stage revision, meaning complete removal of the TKA, insertion of a spacer and replantation at a second stage, had to be performed in three patients treated initially arthroscopically (23%) and in six patients treated initially with an open surgical procedure (21%). CONCLUSIONS Open debridement for acute periprosthetic knee infection shows clear benefits in terms of infection eradication and prosthesis salvage compared to arthroscopic DAIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bartsch
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - P Krenn
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B Lubberts
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Morgenstern
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Infections, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - G Pagenstert
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
- Clarahof Praxisgemeinschaft für Orthopädie Basel, Clarahofweg 19a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Clauss
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Infections, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Simon MJK, Beyersdorff J, Strahl A, Rolvien T, Rüther W, Niemeier A. Diagnostic value of open incisional biopsies in suspected, difficult-to-diagnose periprosthetic hip joint infection prior to revision surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:1663-1670. [PMID: 35348871 PMCID: PMC9957879 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04402-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior to revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA), low-grade chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is often difficult to diagnose. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of open incisional tissue biopsy for the prediction of PJI prior to THA revision in cases with culture-negative or dry tap joint aspirates. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective single-center study includes 32 consecutive THA revision cases with high clinical suspicion of low-grade chronic PJI of the hip with culture-negative or dry tap joint aspirates and without systemic signs of infection. Open incisional biopsy (OIB) was performed prior to revision surgery. Periprosthetic tissue samples were analyzed by microbiology and histopathology for PJI. During definitive revision arthroplasty, identical diagnostics were repeated. Results from both procedures were compared and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of OIB for the final diagnosis were calculated. RESULTS Average age at revision was 69.3 ± 13.5 years. The sensitivity of the OIB procedure was 80% (microbiology), 69% (histology) and 82% for combined analyses (microbiology and histology). Specificity of OIB was 80% (microbiology), 94% (histology) and 60% for combined analyses. CONCLUSIONS Open tissue biopsy performed in cases with culture-negative or inconclusive synovial fluid aspirates prior to revision of THA has limited diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of PJI. The procedure does not reliably close the diagnostic gap in a substantial number of cases. In this difficult patient population, risk of an open procedure may outweigh benefits and alternative less invasive methods should be considered for the preoperative diagnosis of PJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. J. K. Simon
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany ,Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - J. Beyersdorff
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - A. Strahl
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - T. Rolvien
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - W. Rüther
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Niemeier
- Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Niemann M, Otto E, Braun KF, Graef F, Ahmad SS, Hardt S, Stöckle U, Trampuz A, Meller S. Microbiological Advantages of Open Incisional Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infections. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102730. [PMID: 35628857 PMCID: PMC9143629 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a serious complication following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). When preoperative synovial fluid cultures remain inconclusive, open incisional joint biopsy (OIB) can support causative microorganism identification. Objective: This study investigates the potential benefit of OIB in THA and TKA patients with suspected PJI and ambigious diagnostic results following synovial fluid aspiration. Methods: We retrospectively assessed all patients treated from 2016 to 2020 with suspected PJI. Comparing the microbiology of OIB and the following revision surgery, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the number needed to treat (NNT). Results: We examined the diagnostic validity of OIB in 38 patients (20 female) with a median age of 66.5 years. In THA patients (n = 10), sensitivity was 75%, specificity was 66.67%, PPV was 60%, NPV was 80%, and NNT was 2.5. In TKA patients (n = 28), sensitivity was 62.5%, specificity was 95.24%, PPV was 83.33%, NPV was 86.96%, and NNT was 1.42. Conclusions: Our results indicate that OIB represents an adequate diagnostic tool when previously assessed microbiological results remain inconclusive. Particularly in TKA patients, OIB showed an exceptionally high specificity, PPV, and NPV, whereas the predictive validity of the diagnosis of PJI in THA patients remained low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Niemann
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
- Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-652-256; Fax: +49-30-450-552-901
| | - Ellen Otto
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
- Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Karl F. Braun
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Graef
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
| | - Sufian S. Ahmad
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Sebastian Hardt
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
| | - Ulrich Stöckle
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
| | - Sebastian Meller
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (E.O.); (K.F.B.); (F.G.); (S.S.A.); (S.H.); (U.S.); (A.T.); (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|