Association between ulcerative colitis and Helicobacter pylori infection: A case-control study

Practice guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: The Saudi H. pylori Working Group recommendations

The eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori globally are decreasing with a dramatic increase in the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria all over the world, including Saudi Arabia. There is no current consensus on the management of H. pylori in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association developed these practice guidelines after reviewing the local and regional studies on the management of H. pylori. The aim was to establish recommendations to guide healthcare providers in managing H. pylori in Saudi Arabia. Experts in the areas of H. pylori management and microbiology were invited to write these guidelines. A literature search was performed, and all authors participated in writing and reviewing the guidelines. In addition, international guidelines and consensus reports were reviewed to bridge the gap in knowledge when local and regional data were unavailable. There is limited local data on treatment of H. pylori. The rate of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance is high; therefore, standard triple therapy for 10-14 days is no longer recommended in the treatment of H. pylori unless antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed. Based on the available data, bismuth quadruple therapy for 10-14 days is considered the best first-line and second-line therapy. Culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be considered following two treatment failures. These recommendations are intended to provide the most relevant evidence-based guidelines for the management of H. pylori infection in Saudi Arabia. The working group recommends further studies to explore more therapeutic options to eradicate H. pylori.

Helicobacter pylori-derived outer membrane vesicles suppress liver autophagy: A novel mechanism for H. pylori-mediated hepatic disorder

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are nano-sized structures, which have been recently suggested to play a crucial role in H. pylori pathogenesis. There are growing evidence indicating the relationship of H. pylori infection with extra-gastroduodenal diseases, especially liver-related disorders. This study was aimed to investigate the effects of H. pylori-derived OMVs on autophagy in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selection of five clinical strains of H. pylori with different virulence genotypes were included. The OMVs were isolated by ultracentrifugation and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS). The protein concentration of OMVs was measured by BCA assay. MTT assay was used to determine the viability of LX-2 cells (human HSCs) treated with OMVs. The expression level of MTOR, AKT, PI3K, BECN1, ATG16 and LC3B genes was assessed in OMVs-treated LX-2 cells using quantitative real-time PCR. Moreover, immunocytochemistry was performed to evaluate the protein expression of MTOR and LC3B autophagy markers.

RESULTS

H. pylori strains produced round shape nano-vesicles ranging from 50 to 500 nm. Treatment of HSCs with H. pylori-derived OMVs at concentration of 10 μg/mL for 24 h significantly elevated the expression of autophagy inhibitory markers (PI3K, AKT, and MTOR) and suppressed the mRNA expression level of autophagy core proteins (BECN1, ATG16 and LC3B). Immunocytochemistry also presented a substantial reduction in the concentration of LC3B autophagy core protein, and a marked elevation in the amount of MTOR autophagy inhibitory protein.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that H. pylori-derived OMVs could potentially suppress autophagy flux in HSCs as a novel mechanism for H. pylori-mediated liver autophagy impairment and liver disease development. Further studies are required to elucidate the exact role of OMV-carried contents in liver autophagy, and liver-associated disorders.

Helicobacter pylori Infection—A Risk Factor for Irritable Bowel Syndrome? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nowadays, the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection (HPI) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains controversial. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between HPI and IBS through a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the current evidence. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library) by computer to identify all reports published before 8 August 2021. The odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate the association between HPI and IBS. Subgroup analyses were conducted for further assessment and exploration of heterogeneity sources. In addition, we assessed publication bias through funnel plots, Egger’s test, and Begg’s test. Finally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results: Thirteen studies with 13,173 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled OR of the association between HPI and IBS was 1.03 (95% CI [0.80,1.31]; p = 0.84). The adjusted OR of the association between HPI and IBS after excluding the studies with confounding factors defined by our team was 1.29 (95% CI [1.03,1.62]; p = 0.03). We found a positive association between HPI and IBS-D (diarrhea subtype) (OR: 1.54; 95% CI [1.22,1.95]; p = 0.0003). The OR of the relationship between cytotoxin-associated gene A (Cag A) positive HPI and IBS was 4.3 (95% CI [0.51,36.17]; p = 0.18). Conclusions: The likelihood of HPI in IBS patients is relatively higher than that of non-IBS participants but not statistically significant, implying that HPI is not significantly associated with IBS, albeit we may underestimate this association. Moreover, we found a positive association between HPI and IBS-D. We also observed an increased likelihood of Cag-A positive HPI in IBS patients than that of non-IBS participants but not statistically significant.