1
|
Youshani AS, Whittle C, Ghosh K. A risk assessment strategy to re-introduce elective neurosurgery patients during COVID-19. Br J Neurosurg 2024; 38:476-480. [PMID: 33829937 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1900540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To demonstrate the utilisation of a risk assessment protocol designed to prioritise elective neurosurgical patients against the risks of COVID-19. This tool can be applied to all other surgical specialties. DESIGN Prospective case series of 166 patients. SETTING Single-centre tertiary neurosurgical department. PARTICIPANTS All patients awaiting an elective neurosurgical procedure were included in this study. All emergency or life-threatening neurosurgical pathologies affecting patients were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The risk assessment tool identified patients with progressive neurology and stratified need for surgery against risk of harm during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS Using our risk stratification tool, 6.6% patients required expedited surgery and a further 11.4% patients were removed completely from the waiting list. The majority of patients 47%, required surgery within 3 months. CONCLUSIONS This simple tool encourages surgical departments to establish contact with patients during COVID-19. The clinician acquires up-to-date information regarding patient symptomatology and subsequently determines surgical priority, a timescale required for surgery and overall uses of NHS resources efficiently. We recommend the use of this tool for all neurosurgical departments, with a wider application to other surgical specialties during the ongoing pressures of elective backlogs secondary to the persistent COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Saam Youshani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester Neurosciences Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chelsea Whittle
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Kaushik Ghosh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siegel N, Lambrechts MJ, Brush PL, Tomlak A, Lee Y, Karamian BA, Canseco JA, Woods BI, Kaye ID, Hilibrand AS, Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD. A Longitudinal Evaluation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Its Effects on Spinal Decompressions With or Without Fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:E131-E136. [PMID: 38530390 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE The objectives were to (1) compare the safety of spine surgery before and after the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and (2) determine whether patients with a history of COVID-19 were at increased risk of adverse events. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA The COVID-19 pandemic had a tremendous impact on several health care services. In spine surgery, elective cases were canceled and patients received delayed care due to the uncertainty of disease transmission and surgical outcomes. As new coronavirus variants arise, health care systems require guidance on how to provide optimal patient care to all those in need of our services. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review of patients undergoing spine surgery between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2021 was performed. Patients were split into pre-COVID or post-COVID cohorts based on local government guidelines. Inpatient complications, 90-day readmission, and 90-day mortality were compared between groups. Secondary analysis included multiple logistic regression to determine independent predictors of each outcome. RESULTS A total of 2976 patients were included for analysis with 1701 patients designated as pre-COVID and 1275 as post-COVID. The pre-COVID cohort had fewer patients undergoing revision surgery (16.8% vs 21.9%, P < 0.001) and a lower home discharge rate (84.5% vs 88.2%, P = 0.008). Inpatient complication (9.9% vs 9.2%, P = 0.562), inpatient mortality (0.1% vs 0.2%, P = 0.193), 90-day readmission (3.4% vs 3.2%, P = 0.828), and 90-day mortality rates (0.8% vs 0.8%, P = 0.902) were similar between groups. Patients with positive COVID-19 tests before surgery had similar complication rates (7.7% vs 6.1%, P = 1.000) as those without a positive test documented. CONCLUSIONS After the emergence of COVID-19, patients undergoing spine surgery had a greater number of medical comorbidities, but similar rates of inpatient complications, readmission, and mortality. Prior COVID-19 infection was not associated with an increased risk of postsurgical complications or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Siegel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vianna FSL, Neves LL, Testa R, Nassar AP, Peres JHF, da Silva RÁJ, de Paula Sales F, Raglione D, Del Bianco Madureira B, Dalfior L, Malbouisson LMS, Ribeiro U, da Silva JM. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Oncological Surgeries: CORONAL Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15152-9. [PMID: 38530529 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15152-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative recovery from oncology surgeries should be understood for the clinical decision-making. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the postoperative cumulative 28-day mortality and the morbidity of surgical oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients consecutively admitted to intensive care units (ICU) of three centres for postoperative care of oncologic surgeries between March to June 2019 (first phase) and March to June 2020 (second phase). The primary outcome was cumulative 28-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative organic dysfunction and the incidence of clinical complications. Because of the possibility of imbalance between groups, adjusted analyses were performed: Cox proportional hazards model (primary outcome) and multiple logistic regression model (secondary outcomes). RESULTS After screening 328 patients, 291 were included. The proportional hazard of cumulative 28-day mortality was higher in the second phase than that in the first phase in the Cox model, with the adjusted hazard ratio of 4.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.15-8.82). The adjusted incidences of respiratory complications (odds ratio [OR] 5.35; 95% CI 1.42-20.11) and pulmonary infections (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.08-2.17) were higher in the second phase. However, the adjusted incidence of other infections was lower in the second phase (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.67-0.91). CONCLUSIONS Surgical oncology patients who underwent postoperative care in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher hazard of 28-day mortality. Furthermore, these patients had higher odds of respiratory complications and pulmonary infections. Trials registration The study is registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials under the code RBR-8ygjpqm, UTN code U1111-1293-5414.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Souza Lima Vianna
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
- Departamento de Pacientes Graves, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | | | - Renato Testa
- Fundação Antonio Prudente- A C Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Dante Raglione
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Luiz Dalfior
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ulysses Ribeiro
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - João Manoel da Silva
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Hospital do Câncer de Barretos- Fundação Pio XII, Barretos, SP, Brazil
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Departamento de Pacientes Graves, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carramiñana-Nuño R, Borrego-Estella V, Inaraja-Pérez GC, Medina-Mora L, Gasós-García M, Otero-Romero D, Delfau-Lafuente D, Valero-Lázaro MI, Lete-Aguirre N, Arribas-Del-Amo MD. Is perioperative COVID-19 really associated with worse surgical outcomes among vaccinated patients? Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01800-y. [PMID: 38489129 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01800-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During the surge of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, studies revealed high complication and morbidity rates following surgical procedures in COVID-19 positive patients. Anesthetic and surgical societies swiftly developed strategies to mitigate these risks, including a recommended postponement of elective surgeries for a minimum of 7 weeks post-COVID infection. Nowadays, with a predominantly vaccinated population, it has become crucial to discern the influencing factors on post-COVID morbidity and mortality and a reevaluation of the existing recommendations pertaining to elective surgery. METHODS A single-center case-control study was conducted, including patients who underwent surgery between November 2021 and March 2022 and met the inclusion criteria. Eighty COVID-19 positive patients were matched 1:1 with 80 controls, each undergoing an identical intervention within a 2-week time frame. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative mortality and secondary outcome postoperative complications (respiratory and thromboembolic). RESULTS At the time of surgery, 88.8% of patients in the case group and 92.5% in the control group had received at least one vaccine dose. Mortality and morbidity did not show a significant difference when comparing the case and control groups (7.5% vs 6.2%, p = 0.755; 11.3% vs 8.9%, p = 0.541 respectively). In the COVID-positive group, mortality was significantly associated with age over 70 years, ASA score over III, RCRI over 1, emergency procedures, and absence of thromboembolic prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to previously reported findings, we did not observe an increased morbi-mortality in patients with perioperative COVID-19 infection. It may not be necessary to delay elective interventions, except in cases with a high-risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Carramiñana-Nuño
- General and Digestive Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Calle San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Saragossa, Spain.
| | - V Borrego-Estella
- General and Digestive Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Calle San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Saragossa, Spain
| | - G C Inaraja-Pérez
- Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Saragossa, Spain
| | - L Medina-Mora
- General and Digestive Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Calle San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Saragossa, Spain
| | - M Gasós-García
- General and Digestive Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Calle San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Saragossa, Spain
| | - D Otero-Romero
- General and Digestive Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Calle San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Saragossa, Spain
| | - D Delfau-Lafuente
- General and Digestive Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Calle San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Saragossa, Spain
| | - M I Valero-Lázaro
- General and Digestive Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Calle San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Saragossa, Spain
| | - N Lete-Aguirre
- General and Digestive Surgery Department -, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Calle San Juan Bosco, 15, 50009, Saragossa, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Obidike P, Chang A, Calisi O, Lee JJ, Ssentongo P, Ssentongo AE, Oh JS. COVID-19 and Mortality in the Global Surgical Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Surg Res 2024; 297:88-100. [PMID: 38460454 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To date, no systematic review or meta-analysis has comprehensively estimated the risk of mortality by surgery type on an international scale. We aim to delineate the risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 who undergo surgery. METHODS PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, OVID, the World Health Organization Global Literature on Coronavirus Disease, and Corona-Central databases were searched from December 2019 through January 2022. Studies providing data on mortality in patients undergoing surgery were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines for abstracting data were followed and performed independently by two reviewers. The main outcome was mortality in patients with COVID-19. RESULTS Of a total of 4023 studies identified, 46 studies with 80,015 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 67 y; 57% were male. Surgery types included general (14.9%), orthopedic (23.4%), vascular (6.4%), thoracic (10.6%), and urologic (8.5%). Patients undergoing surgery with COVID-19 elicited a nine-fold increased risk of mortality (relative risk [RR] 8.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.96-16.32) over those without COVID-19. In low-income and middle-income countries (RR: 16.04, 95% CI: 4.59-56.12), the mortality risk was twice as high compared to high-income countries (RR: 7.50, 95% CI: 4.30-13.09). CONCLUSIONS Mortality risk in surgical patients with COVID-19 compared to those without is increased almost 10-fold. The risk was highest in low-income and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries, suggesting a disproportionate effect of the pandemic on resource-constrained regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prisca Obidike
- Department of General Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Allison Chang
- Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Olivia Calisi
- Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Jungeun J Lee
- Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Paddy Ssentongo
- Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Anna E Ssentongo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - John S Oh
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Janczewski LM, Browner AE, Cotler JH, Palis BE, Chan K, Joung RH, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP, Boffa DJ, Nelson H. Survival Among Patients With High-Risk Gastrointestinal Cancers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240160. [PMID: 38441896 PMCID: PMC10915687 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Prior reports demonstrated that patients with cancer experienced worse outcomes from pandemic-related stressors and COVID-19 infection. Patients with certain malignant neoplasms, such as high-risk gastrointestinal (HRGI) cancers, may have been particularly affected. Objective To evaluate disruptions in care and outcomes among patients with HRGI cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic, assessing for signs of long-term changes in populations and survival. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database to identify patients with HRGI cancer (esophageal, gastric, primary liver, or pancreatic) diagnosed between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed between August 23 and September 4, 2023. Main Outcome and Measures Trends in monthly new cases and proportions by stage in 2020 were compared with the prior 2 years. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to assess 1-year mortality in 2020 compared with 2018 to 2019. Proportional monthly trends and multivariable logistic regression were used to evaluate 30-day and 90-day mortality in 2020 compared with prior years. Results Of the 156 937 patients included in this study, 54 994 (35.0%) were aged 60 to 69 years and 100 050 (63.8%) were men. There was a substantial decrease in newly diagnosed HRGI cancers in March to May 2020, which returned to prepandemic levels by July 2020. For stage, there was a proportional decrease in the diagnosis of stage I (-3.9%) and stage II (-2.3%) disease, with an increase in stage IV disease (7.1%) during the early months of the pandemic. Despite a slight decrease in 1-year survival rates in 2020 (50.7% in 2018 and 2019 vs 47.4% in 2020), survival curves remained unchanged between years (all P > .05). After adjusting for confounders, diagnosis in 2020 was not associated with increased 1-year mortality compared with 2018 to 2019 (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.01). The rates of 30-day (2.1% in 2018, 2.0% in 2019, and 2.1% in 2020) and 90-day (4.3% in 2018, 4.4% in 2019, and 4.6% in 2020) operative mortality also remained similar. Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective cohort study, a period of underdiagnosis and increase in stage IV disease was observed for HRGI cancers during the pandemic; however, there was no change in 1-year survival or operative mortality. These results demonstrate the risks associated with gaps in care and the tremendous efforts of the cancer community to ensure quality care delivery during the pandemic. Future research should investigate long-term survival changes among all cancer types as additional follow-up data are accrued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M. Janczewski
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Bryan E. Palis
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kelley Chan
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rachel H. Joung
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David J. Bentrem
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ryan P. Merkow
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel J. Boffa
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Heidi Nelson
- American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blumenfeld O, Rosenberg A, Reuven M, Caspi I, Sharoni E, Leviner DB. The effect of COVID-19 vaccination on 30-day mortality after cardiac surgery - Insights from the Israel national registries. Infect Prev Pract 2024; 6:100334. [PMID: 38235125 PMCID: PMC10792629 DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background We compared the effect of perioperative COVID-19, before and after vaccination, on 30-day mortality after cardiac surgery. Methods Data was extracted from several national registries. The study period was March 1st, 2020-March 31st, 2022. Results 2594 adult patients underwent cardiac surgery before the availability of a universal COVID-19 vaccine. 33 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to surgery (mean age 58.3±10.0, mean length of time 73.6±60.1 days) and 7 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 0-14 days after surgery (age 66.4±7.6). These were compared to 4426 patients who underwent cardiac surgery after the availability of a universal vaccine: 469 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to surgery (age 62.1±10.1, length of time 175.8±158.2) and 32 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 0-14 days after surgery (age 60.8±14.5). In patients diagnosed with COVID-19 prior to surgery, there was no excess 30-day mortality either before or after vaccination (1 (3.0%) vs. 57 (2.2%), respectively, P<0.8, and 8 (1.7%) vs. 87 (2.2%), respectively, P<0.5). Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 after surgery, but before vaccination, had significantly higher 30-day mortality compared to COVID-19 negative patients (2 (28.6%) vs. 56 (2.2%) respectively, P<0.0001). This excess mortality disappeared after universal vaccination (1 (3.1%) vs. 94 (2.1%) respectively, P<0.7). Conclusions COVID-19, when diagnosed in the early post-operative period, was a risk factor for mortality before available vaccinations, but not after vaccination was widely available. Pre-surgery screening and post-surgical isolation is essential until vaccines are available. This data may be useful for patient management in future respiratory pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Blumenfeld
- Israel Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Alina Rosenberg
- Israel Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Michal Reuven
- Israel Center for Disease Control, Ministry of Health, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Inbar Caspi
- Internal Medicine Department, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Erez Sharoni
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
- The Ruth & Baruch Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dror B. Leviner
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
- The Ruth & Baruch Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ryu HS, Jung SH, Cho EH, Choo JM, Kim JS, Baek SJ, Kim J, Kwak JM. Impact of COVID-19 infection during the postoperative period in patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery: a retrospective study. Ann Surg Treat Res 2024; 106:133-139. [PMID: 38435490 PMCID: PMC10902620 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.3.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to significant global casualties. This study examines the postoperative impact of COVID-19 on patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery, considering their heightened vulnerability to infections and increased morbidity and mortality risk. Methods This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary center and patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery between January 2022 and February 2023 were included. Postoperative COVID-19 infection was defined as the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA by RT-PCR within 14 days after surgery. Propensity score matching was performed including age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status classification, and emergency operation between the COVID-19-negative (-) and -positive (+) groups. Results Following 1:2 propensity score matching, 21 COVID-19(+) and 42 COVID-19(-) patients were included in the study. In the COVID-19(+) group, the postoperative complication rate was significantly higher (52.4% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.023). Mechanical ventilator requirement, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and readmission rate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The median length of ICU (19 days vs. 4 days, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (18 vs. 8 days, P = 0.015) were significantly longer in the COVID-19(+) group. Patients with COVID-19 had a 2.4 times higher relative risk (RR) of major complications than patients without COVID-19 (RR, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.254-4.467; P = 0.015). Conclusion COVID-19 infection during the postoperative period in gastrointestinal surgery may have adverse outcomes which may increase the risk of major complications. Preoperative COVID-19 screening and protocols for COVID-19 prevention in surgical patients should be maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo Seon Ryu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Hoon Jung
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Hae Cho
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Min Choo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji-Seon Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se-Jin Baek
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Myun Kwak
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cook E, Laycock J, Sivapathasuntharam D, Maturana C, Hilton C, Doherty L, Hewitt C, McDaid C, Torgerson D, Bates P. Surgical versus non-surgical management of lateral compression type-1 pelvic fracture in adults 60 years and older: the L1FE RCT. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-67. [PMID: 38512076 DOI: 10.3310/lapw3412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Lateral compression type-1 pelvic fractures are a common fragility fracture in older adults. Patients who do not mobilise due to ongoing pain are at greater risk of immobility-related complications. Standard treatment in the United Kingdom is provision of pain relief and early mobilisation, unlike fragility hip fractures, which are usually treated surgically based on evidence that early surgery is associated with better outcomes. Currently there is no evidence on whether patients with lateral compression type-1 fragility fractures would have a better recovery with surgery than non-surgical management. Objectives To assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical fixation with internal fixation device compared to non-surgical management of lateral compression type-1 fragility fractures in older adults. Design Pragmatic, randomised controlled superiority trial, with 12-month internal pilot; target sample size was 600 participants. Participants were randomised between surgical and non-surgical management (1 : 1 allocation ratio). An economic evaluation was planned. Setting UK Major Trauma Centres. Participants Patients aged 60 years or older with a lateral compression type-1 pelvic fracture, arising from a low-energy fall and unable to mobilise independently to a distance of 3 m and back due to pelvic pain 72 hours after injury. Interventions Internal fixation device surgical fixation and non-surgical management. Participants, surgeons and outcome assessors were not blinded to treatment allocation. Main outcome measures Primary outcome - average patient health-related quality of life, over 6 months, assessed by the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version utility score. Secondary outcomes (over the 6 months following injury) - self-rated health, physical function, mental health, pain, delirium, displacement of pelvis, mortality, complications and adverse events, and resource use data for the economic evaluation. Results The trial closed early, at the end of the internal pilot, due to low recruitment. The internal pilot was undertaken in two separate phases because of a pause in recruitment due to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The planned statistical and health economic analyses were not conducted. Outcome data were summarised descriptively. Eleven sites opened for recruitment for a combined total of 92 months. Three-hundred and sixteen patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 43 were eligible (13.6%). The main reason for ineligibility was that the patient was able to mobilise independently to 3 m and back (n = 161). Of the 43 eligible participants, 36 (83.7%) were approached for consent, of whom 11 (30.6%) provided consent. The most common reason for eligible patients not consenting to take part was that they were unwilling to be randomised to a treatment (n = 10). There were 11 participants, 5 randomised to surgical management with internal fixation device and 6 to non-surgical management. The average age of participants was 83.0 years (interquartile range 76.0, 89.0) and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version utility score at 6 months post randomisation (n = 8) was 0.32 (standard deviation 0.37). A limitation of the trial was that study objectives were not addressed due to poor recruitment. Conclusions It was not feasible to recruit to this trial in the current context. Further research to understand the treatment and recovery pathways of this group of patients, along with their outcomes, would be needed prior to undertaking a future trial. Future work Exploration of equipoise across different healthcare professional groups. Investigate longer-term patient outcomes. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN16478561. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/167/57) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 15. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Cook
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Joanne Laycock
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Camila Maturana
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Laura Doherty
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Catriona McDaid
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - David Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Peter Bates
- Bart's Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xi Y, Guo Y, Qiu S, Lv F, Deng Y, Xie J, Xing Z, Bo Y, Chang C, Zhang F, Ji F, Li M. Trends in gynaecologic cancer mortality and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Infect Agent Cancer 2024; 19:4. [PMID: 38378712 PMCID: PMC10880335 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-024-00567-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our aim was to assess the trend in gynaecologic cancer (GC) mortality in the period from 2010 to 2022 in the United States, with focus on the impact of the pandemic on increased deaths. METHODS GC mortality data were extracted from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) platform. We analysed mortality trends and evaluated observed vs. predicted mortality for the period from 2020 to 2022 with joinpoint regression and prediction modelling analyses. RESULTS A total of 334,382 deaths among adults aged 25 years and older with gynaecologic cancer were documented from 2010 to 2022. The overall age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR, per 100,000 persons) for ovarian cancer-related death decreased gradually from 7.189 in 2010 to 5.517 in 2019, yielding an APC (annual percentage change) of -2.8%. However, the decrease in ovarian cancer-related mortality slowed down by more than 4-fold during the pandemic. Cervical cancer -related mortality decreased slightly prior to the pandemic and increased during the pandemic with an APC of 0.6%, resulting in excess mortality of 4.92%, 9.73% and 2.03% in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. For uterine corpus cancer, the ASMR increased from 1.905 in 2010 to 2.787 in 2019, and increased sharply to 3.079 in 2021 and 3.211 in 2022. The ASMR rose steadily between 2013 and 2022, yielding an APC of 6.9%. CONCLUSIONS Overall, we found that GC-related mortality increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and this increase was not specific to age, race, or ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuyan Xi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.157 Xi Wu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
| | - Yuxin Guo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.157 Xi Wu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
| | - Sikai Qiu
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Fan Lv
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yujiao Deng
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.157 Xi Wu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jingyi Xie
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zixuan Xing
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.157 Xi Wu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
| | - Yajing Bo
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Chenyu Chang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.157 Xi Wu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China
| | - Fan Zhang
- Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Fanpu Ji
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.157 Xi Wu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China.
- National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biodiagnosis and Biotherapy, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
- Shaanxi Provincial Clinical Medical Research Center of Infectious Diseases, Xi'an, China.
- Key Laboratory of Surgical Critical Care and Life Support (Xi'an Jiaotong University), Ministry of Education, Xi'an, China.
- Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Ministry of Education of China, Xi'an, China.
| | - Mu Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.157 Xi Wu Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China.
- National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biodiagnosis and Biotherapy, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blegen MB, Rook JM, Jackson NJ, Maggard-Gibbons M, Li R, Russell MM, Russell TA, de Virgilio C, Tsugawa Y. Changes in surgical mortality during COVID-19 pandemic by patients' race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status among US older adults: a quasi-experimental event study model. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079825. [PMID: 38365289 PMCID: PMC10882376 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine changes in the 30-day surgical mortality rate after common surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic and investigate whether its impact varies by urgency of surgery or patient race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. DESIGN We used a quasi-experimental event study design to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical mortality rate, using patients who received the same procedure in the prepandemic years (2016-2019) as the control, adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital fixed effects (effectively comparing patients treated at the same hospital). We conducted stratified analyses by procedure urgency, patient race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status (dual-Medicaid status and median household income). SETTING Acute care hospitals in the USA. PARTICIPANTS Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65-99 years who underwent one of 14 common surgical procedures from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 30-day postoperative mortality rate. RESULTS Our sample included 3 620 689 patients. Surgical mortality was higher during the pandemic, with peak mortality observed in April 2020 (adjusted risk difference (aRD) +0.95 percentage points (pp); 95% CI +0.76 to +1.26 pp; p<0.001) and mortality remained elevated through 2020. The effect of the pandemic on mortality was larger for non-elective (vs elective) procedures (April 2020: aRD +0.44 pp (+0.16 to +0.72 pp); p=0.002 for elective; aRD +1.65 pp (+1.00, +2.30 pp); p<0.001 for non-elective). We found no evidence that the pandemic mortality varied by patients' race and ethnicity (p for interaction=0.29), or socioeconomic status (p for interaction=0.49). CONCLUSIONS 30-day surgical mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic peaked in April 2020 and remained elevated until the end of the year. The influence of the pandemic on surgical mortality did not vary by patient race and ethnicity or socioeconomic status, indicating that once patients were able to access care and undergo surgery, surgical mortality was similar across groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariah B Blegen
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- National Clinician Scholars Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jordan M Rook
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- National Clinician Scholars Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicholas J Jackson
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Melinda Maggard-Gibbons
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ruixin Li
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marcia M Russell
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tara A Russell
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christian de Virgilio
- Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Yusuke Tsugawa
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wei N, Chen JS, Hu BS, Cao Y, Dai ZP. Effects of driving pressure-guided ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with COVID-19 undergoing abdominal surgery: A post-hoc propensity score-matched analysis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e25533. [PMID: 38333813 PMCID: PMC10850964 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Application of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on minimum driving pressure facilitates to prevent from postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Whether lung protective ventilation strategy can reduce the risk of PPCs in COVID-19 patients remains unclear. In this study, we compared the effects of driving pressure-guided ventilation with conventional mechanical ventilation on PPCs in patients with COVID-19. Methods Patients infected COVID-19 within 30-day before surgery were retrospectively enrolled consecutively. Patients were divided into two group: driving pressure-guided lung protective ventilation strategy group (LPVS group) and conventional mechanical ventilation group (Control group). Propensity score matching for variables selected was used by logistic regression with the nearest-neighbor method. The outcomes were the incidence of PPCs and hypoxemia in post-anesthesia care unit. Results There was no significant difference in the baseline data between both groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of PPCs (12.73 % vs 36.36 %, χ2 = 7.068, P = 0.008) and hypoxemia [18.18 % vs 38.18 %, χ2 = 4.492, P = 0.034], and lung ultrasound scores [4.68 ± 1.60 vs 8.39 ± 1.87, t = 8.383, P < 0.001] in LPVS group were lower than control group. The PEEP, airway pressure and plateau pressure in LPVS group were higher than control group, but driving pressure and tidal volume was lower than control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Individualized PEEP ventilation strategy guided by minimum driving pressure could improve oxygenation and reduce the incidence of PPCs in surgical patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Wei
- Department of Emergency Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Jun-Sheng Chen
- Department of Anaesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Bang-Sheng Hu
- Department of Anaesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Ya Cao
- Department of Anaesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| | - Ze-Ping Dai
- Department of Anaesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Myles PS. COVID-19 and Surgery: Getting Back to Business. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:183-185. [PMID: 38193742 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Myles
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital, and Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Elbuzidi M, Wenzel AN, Harris A, Marrache M, Oni JK, Khanuja HS, Hegde V. Preoperative COVID-19 infection status negatively impacts postoperative outcomes of geriatric hip fracture surgery. Injury 2024; 55:111201. [PMID: 37980857 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Compare outcomes for patients with recently diagnosed COVID-19 infection to those without COVID-19 infection undergoing operative treatment of hip fractures using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. DESIGN Retrospective propensity score matched cohort. METHODS Patients who received surgery for an acute hip fracture (intramedullary nail (IMN), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or hemiarthroplasty) in 2021 were identified from the NSQIP database. Propensity score matching was implemented using patient demographics and preoperative medical conditions to compare outcomes for COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative cohorts. RESULTS After matching, COVID-19-positive patients exhibited a higher risk of 30-day mortality (Odds ratio (OR) 1.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01 - 2.04), pneumonia (OR 2.90, 95 % CI: 1.91 - 4.33), unplanned intubation (OR 2.53, 95 % CI: 1.39 - 4.39), and septic shock (OR 2.51, 95 % CI: 1.10 - 4.67). COVID-19-positive patients were also more likely to have a longer length of hospital stay (Hazard Ratio 1.3, 95 % CI: 1.20 - 1.41) and were more likely to be discharged to an acute care hospital (OR 1.90, 95 % CI: 1.03 - 3.06). CONCLUSIONS Active COVID-19 infection is an independent risk factor for complications as well as increased resource utilization in patients undergoing surgical treatment of acute hip fracture. Using the results of this multicenter study, quantification of these risks can help inform practice and treatment protocols for this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Elbuzidi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Alyssa N Wenzel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Andrew Harris
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Majd Marrache
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Julius K Oni
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Harpal S Khanuja
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Vishal Hegde
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chauhan GS, Kaur J, Habeebullah A, Dewan V, Pemmaraju G. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom. Cureus 2024; 16:e53928. [PMID: 38465094 PMCID: PMC10924859 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic led to a national lockdown and a major reorganization of healthcare services in the United Kingdom. The center where the study was done was one of the worst affected hospitals in the United Kingdom at the outset of the pandemic. Our study evaluates the impact of the pandemic and national lockdown on the outcomes for patients undergoing orthopedic trauma surgery. Methods We prospectively identified all patients undergoing orthopedic trauma surgery in the unit from 1st March 2020 to 31st May 2020. We recorded demographics, diagnoses, COVID-19 infection status, length of stay, and mortality. This was compared with a comparative group in the same period in 2018 and 2019. Results There was a significant reduction in the number of orthopedic trauma surgery cases (318) performed in 2020 compared to 2019 (423 cases, p<0.001) and 2018 (444 cases, p<0.001). The mean time from injury to presentation was 3.6 days, with 40 patients (12.6%) presenting more than one week after injury. The 30-day mortality was 8.2%, and the six-month mortality was 15.1%, with both significantly higher than in 2018 (p<0.001) and 2019 (p<0.001). COVID-19 testing was positive in 39% of patients, with 30-day mortality in this group at 37%, rising to a 53% six-month mortality. No patients under the age of 50 years old died. The majority of admissions (51%) were due to falls at home. The second most common mechanism was Do-It-Yourself (DIY) injuries. Road traffic accidents accounted for 2%. Conclusion There were significantly fewer cases of orthopedic trauma surgery during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period in previous years. The type of trauma also showed low numbers of high-energy and sporting injuries as a result of the national lockdown. Patients undergoing orthopedic trauma surgery who tested positive for COVID-19 had significantly higher 30-day mortality than those without COVID-19, and this increased mortality persisted to six months post-operatively. However, patients under 50 years old appear to be at low risk of death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Govind S Chauhan
- Orthopaedics, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR
| | - Jasprit Kaur
- Orthopaedics, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR
| | | | - Varun Dewan
- Orthopaedics, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, GBR
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gong T, Huang Q, Zhang Q, Cui Y. Postoperative outcomes of pediatric patients with perioperative COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Anesth 2024; 38:125-135. [PMID: 37897542 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03272-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients with COVID-19 infection. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library from December 2019 to 21 April 2023. Observational cohort studies that reported postoperative early mortality and pulmonary complications of pediatric patients with confirmed COVID-19-positive compared with COVID-19-negative were eligible for inclusion. We excluded pediatric patients underwent organ transplantation or cardiac surgery. Reviews, case reports, letters, and editorials were also excluded. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias for each included study. The primary outcome was postoperative early mortality, defined as mortality within 30 days after surgery or during hospitalization. The random-effects model was performed to assess the pooled estimates, which were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS 9 studies involving 23,031 pediatric patients were included, and all studies were rated as high quality. Compared with pediatric patients without COVID-19, pediatric patients with COVID-19 showed a significantly increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) (RR = 4.24; 95% CI 2.08-8.64). No clear evidence was found for differences in postoperative early mortality (RR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.34-2.06), postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission (RR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.39-1.68), and length of hospital stay (MD = 0.35, 95% CI -1.81-2.51) between pediatric patients with and without COVID-19. CONCLUSION Perioperative COVID-19 infection was strongly associated with increased risk of PPCs, but it did not increase the risk of postoperative early mortality, the rate of postoperative ICU admission, and the length of hospital stay in pediatric patients. Our preplanned sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of our study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianqing Gong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 1617, Riyue Avenue, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 611731, China
| | - Qinghua Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 1617, Riyue Avenue, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 611731, China
| | - Qianqian Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 1617, Riyue Avenue, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 611731, China
| | - Yu Cui
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 1617, Riyue Avenue, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 611731, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aziz MF, Schenning K, Koike S, O'Glasser A, O'Reilly-Shah VN, Sera V, Mathis M. Perioperative Mortality of the COVID-19 Recovered Patient Compared to a Matched Control: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology 2024; 140:195-206. [PMID: 37844271 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical procedures performed on patients with recent exposure to COVID-19 infection have been associated with increased mortality risk in previous studies. Accordingly, elective surgery is often delayed after infection. The study aimed to compare 30-day hospital mortality and postoperative complications (acute kidney injury, pulmonary complications) of surgical patients with a previous COVID-19 infection to a matched cohort of patients without known previous COVID-19. The authors hypothesized that COVID-19 exposure would be associated with an increased mortality risk. METHODS In this retrospective observational cohort study, patients presenting for elective inpatient surgery across a multicenter cohort of academic and community hospitals from April 2020 to April 2021 who had previously tested positive for COVID-19 were compared to controls who had received at least one previous COVID-19 test but without a known previous COVID-19-positive test. The cases were matched based on anthropometric data, institution, and comorbidities. Further, the outcomes were analyzed stratified by timing of a positive test result in relation to surgery. RESULTS Thirty-day mortality occurred in 229 of 4,951 (4.6%) COVID-19-exposed patients and 122 of 4,951 (2.5%) controls. Acute kidney injury was observed in 172 of 1,814 (9.5%) exposed patients and 156 of 1,814 (8.6%) controls. Pulmonary complications were observed in 237 of 1,637 (14%) exposed patients and 164 of 1,637 (10%) controls. COVID-19 exposure was associated with an increased 30-day mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.38 to 1.91) and an increased risk of pulmonary complications (1.60; 1.36 to 1.88), but was not associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (1.03; 0.87 to 1.22). Surgery within 2 weeks of infection was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality and pulmonary complications, but that effect was nonsignificant after 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a positive test for COVID-19 before elective surgery early in the pandemic have an elevated risk of perioperative mortality and pulmonary complications but not acute kidney injury as compared to matched controls. The span of time from positive test to time of surgery affected the mortality and pulmonary risk, which subsided after 2 weeks. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Aziz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Katie Schenning
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Seiji Koike
- Biostatistics and Design Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Avital O'Glasser
- Departments of Medicine and Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Valerie Sera
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Michael Mathis
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Otremski H, Dermott J, Page K, Ipp LS, Blanco JS, Studer D, Sigal A, Kim D, Hasler CC, Lebel DE, Widmann RF, Ovadia D. The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric spinal care: A multi-centric study. J Child Orthop 2024; 18:33-39. [PMID: 38348438 PMCID: PMC10859112 DOI: 10.1177/18632521231210356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare worldwide since December 2019. We aimed to identify the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient clinic and surgical volumes and peri-operative complications for pediatric spinal deformities patients. Methods In this multi-center retrospective study, outpatient visits (in-person and virtual care) and pediatric spine surgeries volumes in four high-volume pediatric spine centers were compared between March and December 2019 and the same period in 2020. Peri-operative complications were collected and compared in the same periods. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and comparative analyses were performed. Results During the 2020 study period, the outpatient visit (in-person and virtual care) volume decreased during local lockdown periods by 71% for new patients (p < 0.001) and 53% for returning patients (p = 0.03). Overall, for 2020, there was a 20% reduction in new patients (p = 0.001) and 21% decrease in returning patients (p < 0.001). During the pandemic, there was also 20% less overall surgical volume of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing primary posterior spinal fusion, with a 70% reduction during lockdown times (p < 0.001). Complication rate and profile were similar between periods. Conclusion There was a significant decrease in outpatient pediatric spine outpatient visits, particularly new patients, which may increase the proportion of pediatric patients with spinal deformities that present late, meeting surgical indication. This, in combination with the reduction in surgical volume of AIS over the first year of the pandemic, could result in an extended waitlist for surgeries during years to come. Complication rate was similar for both periods, suggesting it is safe to continue elective pediatric spine surgery even in a time of a pandemic. Level of evidence level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hila Otremski
- Pediatric Orthopaedic Department, Dana Dwek Children’s Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jennifer Dermott
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kira Page
- Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lisa S Ipp
- Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - John S Blanco
- Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Studer
- Orthopaedic Department, Children’s Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Amit Sigal
- Pediatric Orthopaedic Department, Dana Dwek Children’s Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dorothy Kim
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carol C Hasler
- Orthopaedic Department, Children’s Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - David E Lebel
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Roger F Widmann
- Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dror Ovadia
- Pediatric Orthopaedic Department, Dana Dwek Children’s Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ma J, Wang Y, Liu J, Wu Y, Zhang S, Li X, Zha D, Zhou J, Xia Y, Zhang X. Impact of perioperative SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection on postoperative complications in liver cancer hepatectomy: A single-center matched study. Int J Infect Dis 2024; 139:101-108. [PMID: 38065317 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the effects of perioperative SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection on postoperative complications in patients with liver cancer. METHODS A propensity-matched study was conducted, which included patients with primary liver cancer who underwent hepatectomy from September 01, 2022 to January 20, 2023. Patients who infected SARS-CoV-2 Omicron during the perioperative period (7 days before to 30 days after surgery) were matched 1:1 with noninfected patients. The primary outcomes, which were COVID-19-related major complications and liver resection-specific complications, were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 243 patients were included, with 63 cases of perioperative infections, of which 62 were postoperative infections. The overall 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.6% (4/243). Compared to noninfected patients, those with perioperative infections showed no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse postoperative outcomes. However, they had a higher rate of 30-day readmission after surgery (11.1% vs 0%, P = 0.013). Perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection was not associated with "major cardiorespiratory complications" or "liver resection-specific complications", but age, pre-existing comorbidities, and tumor type were related to these outcomes. CONCLUSION Perioperative SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with liver cancer. However, those patients had a higher rate of 30-day readmission after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyong Ma
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yizhou Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yali Wu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China; Clinical Graduate School, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shichao Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xifeng Li
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Daoxi Zha
- Department of Anesthesiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Xia
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaofeng Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Uno S, Goto R, Honda K, Uchida S, Uwamino Y, Namkoong H, Yoshifuji A, Mikita K, Takano Y, Matsumoto M, Kitagawa Y, Hasegawa N. Cost-Effectiveness of Universal Asymptomatic Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase Chain Reaction Screening: A Cost-Utility Analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:57-64. [PMID: 37556365 PMCID: PMC10810706 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An early report has shown the clinical benefit of the asymptomatic preoperative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) screening test, and some clinical guidelines recommended this test. However, the cost-effectiveness of asymptomatic screening was not evaluated. We aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of universal preoperative screening of asymptomatic patients for SARS-CoV-2 using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. METHODS We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of asymptomatic screening using a decision tree model from a payer perspective, assuming that the test-positive rate was 0.07% and the screening cost was 8500 Japanese yen (JPY) (approximately 7601 US dollars [USD]). The input parameter was derived from the available evidence reported in the literature. A willingness-to-pay threshold was set at 5 000 000 JPY/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS The incremental cost of 1 death averted was 74 469 236 JPY (approximately 566 048 USD) and 291 123 368 JPY/QALY (approximately 2 212 856 USD/QALY), which was above the 5 000 000 JPY/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio fell below 5 000 000 JPY/QALY only when the test-positive rate exceeded 0.739%. However, when the probability of developing a postoperative pulmonary complication among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was below 0.22, asymptomatic screening was never cost-effective, regardless of how high the test-positive rate became. CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic preoperative universal SARS-CoV-2 PCR screening is not cost-effective in the base case analysis. The cost-effectiveness mainly depends on the test-positive rate, the frequency of postoperative pulmonary complications, and the screening costs; however, no matter how high the test-positive rate, the cost-effectiveness is poor if the probability of developing postoperative pulmonary complications among patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 is sufficiently reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Uno
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rei Goto
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Graduate School of Business Administration, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
- Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kimiko Honda
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
- Center of Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Keio University Global Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sho Uchida
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Uwamino
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ho Namkoong
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayumi Yoshifuji
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Mikita
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yaoko Takano
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Morio Matsumoto
- Department of Orthopedics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Hasegawa
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shalaby M, ElSheikh AM, Hamed H. Burnout among surgeons before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international survey. BMC Psychol 2024; 12:48. [PMID: 38273390 PMCID: PMC10810224 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01517-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had many significant impacts within the surgical realm, and surgeons have been obligated to reconsider almost every aspect of daily clinical practice. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study reported in compliance with the CHERRIES guidelines and conducted through an online platform from June 14th to July 15th, 2020. The primary outcome was the burden of burnout during the pandemic indicated by the validated Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure. RESULTS Nine hundred fifty-four surgeons completed the survey. The median length of practice was 10 years; 78.2% included were male with a median age of 37 years old, 39.5% were consultants, 68.9% were general surgeons, and 55.7% were affiliated with an academic institution. Overall, there was a significant increase in the mean burnout score during the pandemic; longer years of practice and older age were significantly associated with less burnout. There were significant reductions in the median number of outpatient visits, operated cases, on-call hours, emergency visits, and research work, so, 48.2% of respondents felt that the training resources were insufficient. The majority (81.3%) of respondents reported that their hospitals were included in the management of COVID-19, 66.5% felt their roles had been minimized; 41% were asked to assist in non-surgical medical practices, and 37.6% of respondents were included in COVID-19 management. CONCLUSIONS There was a significant burnout among trainees. Almost all aspects of clinical and research activities were affected with a significant reduction in the volume of research, outpatient clinic visits, surgical procedures, on-call hours, and emergency cases hindering the training. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered on clicaltrials.gov "NCT04433286" on 16/06/2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Shalaby
- Department of General Surgery, Mansoura University, 60 ElGomhouria Street, Mansoura, Dakahliya, 35516, Egypt.
| | - Ahmed M ElSheikh
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Security Forces Program Hospital Makkah, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Hosam Hamed
- Department of General Surgery, Mansoura University, 60 ElGomhouria Street, Mansoura, Dakahliya, 35516, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang WG, Peng YF, Yang YB, Li B, Wei YG, Liu F. Timing of hepatectomy following the Omicron variant infection for vaccinated-patients: A retrospective cohort study. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024:S1499-3872(24)00001-8. [PMID: 38281903 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Wu-Gui Yang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yu-Fu Peng
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yu-Bo Yang
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Bo Li
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yong-Gang Wei
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhang H, Zhao Y, Du Y, Yang Y, Zhang J, Wang S. Effect Modification of COVID-19 Symptoms on the Association Between Timing of Surgery and Postoperative Complications in Pediatric Spinal Deformity: A Prospective Cohort Study. World Neurosurg 2024:S1878-8750(24)00065-2. [PMID: 38224906 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal timing and associated risks of pediatric spinal deformity surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS All consecutive surgical cases for spinal deformity between September 2022 and May 2023 were included. The population was divided into several categories according to the time from diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection to the day of surgery. Postoperative complications were analyzed using logistic regression, and we simultaneously showed the results from the crude model, minimally adjusted model, and fully adjusted model. RESULTS A total of 81 consecutive patients were enrolled. In the fully adjusted model, compared with pre-COVID-19 patients, peri-COVID-19 patients had a 4.5-fold increased risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio = 5.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1-27.2, P = 0.037), early post-COVID-19 patients had a 2.3-fold increased risk (odds ratio= 3.3, 95% confidence interval 0.7-16.1, P = 0.133), and late post-COVID-19 patients were at essentially equal risk. In asymptomatic population, early post-COVID-19 patients and late post-COVID-19 patients appeared to be at equal risk compared with pre-COVID-19 patients. For patients with persistent symptoms, is necessary to wait at least 8 weeks or even longer after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Interaction tests demonstrated that the effect of the timing of surgery on postoperative complications significantly differed in populations with different symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Surgery for pediatric spinal deformity should be postponed until 8 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection in cases with COVID-19-related symptoms within 2 weeks prior to surgery; whereas, for those who are asymptomatic within 2 weeks prior to surgery, an interval of 4 weeks seemed to be sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoran Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yiwei Zhao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - You Du
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shengru Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yoshida T, Chude-Sokei R, Araji T, Adra S. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Surge on Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Study. Am Surg 2024:31348241227213. [PMID: 38215308 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241227213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, including surgical care. While many studies examined the effect of the pandemic on different patient outcomes, there are none to date examining the impact of the pandemic surge on surgical outcomes. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 surges on surgical outcomes using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis of 7436 patients who underwent surgery between February 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Patients were divided into those who underwent surgery during the surge of the pandemic (n = 1217) or outside that period (n = 6219). Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and morbidity. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, operation time, transfusion, reoperation, and specific postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used in our analysis. All analyses were conducted using the software "R" version 4.2.1. Statistical significance was set at α = .05 level. RESULTS After adjusting for confounders, we found no significant difference in 30-day mortality and morbidity (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: .89-1.226, P = .5173) or 30-day mortality only (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: .788-2.14, P = .1364) between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results to the multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSION We found no evidence of increased 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery during the COVID-19 surges compared to those undergoing surgery outside that period. Our results suggest that surgical care was maintained despite the challenges of the pandemic surges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuto Yoshida
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Tarek Araji
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Souheil Adra
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gwilym BL, Pallmann P, Waldron CA, Thomas-Jones E, Milosevic S, Brookes-Howell L, Harris D, Massey I, Burton J, Stewart P, Samuel K, Jones S, Cox D, Clothier A, Prout H, Edwards A, Twine CP, Bosanquet DC. Long-term risk prediction after major lower limb amputation: 1-year results of the PERCEIVE study. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrad135. [PMID: 38266124 PMCID: PMC10807997 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision-making when considering major lower limb amputation is complex and requires individualized outcome estimation. It is unknown how accurate healthcare professionals or relevant outcome prediction tools are at predicting outcomes at 1-year after major lower limb amputation. METHODS An international, multicentre prospective observational study evaluating healthcare professional accuracy in predicting outcomes 1 year after major lower limb amputation and evaluation of relevant outcome prediction tools identified in a systematic search of the literature was undertaken. Observed outcomes at 1 year were compared with: healthcare professionals' preoperative predictions of death (surgeons and anaesthetists), major lower limb amputation revision (surgeons) and ambulation (surgeons, specialist physiotherapists and vascular nurse practitioners); and probabilities calculated from relevant outcome prediction tools. RESULTS A total of 537 patients and 2244 healthcare professional predictions of outcomes were included. Surgeons and anaesthetists had acceptable discrimination (C-statistic = 0.715), calibration and overall performance (Brier score = 0.200) when predicting 1-year death, but performed worse when predicting major lower limb amputation revision and ambulation (C-statistics = 0.627 and 0.662 respectively). Healthcare professionals overestimated the death and major lower limb amputation revision risks. Consultants outperformed trainees, especially when predicting ambulation. Allied healthcare professionals marginally outperformed surgeons in predicting ambulation. Two outcome prediction tools (C-statistics = 0.755 and 0.717, Brier scores = 0.158 and 0.178) outperformed healthcare professionals' discrimination, calibration and overall performance in predicting death. Two outcome prediction tools for ambulation (C-statistics = 0.688 and 0.667) marginally outperformed healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION There is uncertainty in predicting 1-year outcomes following major lower limb amputation. Different professional groups performed comparably in this study. Two outcome prediction tools for death and two for ambulation outperformed healthcare professionals and may support shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenig Llwyd Gwilym
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Gwent Vascular Institute, Royal Gwent Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Debbie Harris
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ian Massey
- Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre, Rookwood Hospital, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jo Burton
- Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre, Rookwood Hospital, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Phillippa Stewart
- Artificial Limb and Appliance Centre, Rookwood Hospital, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Katie Samuel
- Department of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Jones
- C/O INVOLVE Health and Care Research Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - David Cox
- C/O INVOLVE Health and Care Research Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Hayley Prout
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Christopher P Twine
- Bristol, Bath and Weston Vascular Network, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yang Y, Niu L, Zhu Y, Wu Z, Xia L, Xiao C, Shen X, Xiao X, Tian C, Lin F. Optimum timing of lung resection surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection for non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6891. [PMID: 38169158 PMCID: PMC10807575 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on postoperative recovery of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is need to be understood, thereby informing the optimal timing of surgical decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic for NSCLC patients. This study reports the postoperative outcomes of surgical NSCLC patients with preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHOD This single-center retrospective cohort study included 241 NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy or sub-lobectomy between December 1, 2022 and February 14, 2023. Surgical outcomes of patients with preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection (stratified by the time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery) were compared with those without preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcomes were total postoperative complications and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), the secondary outcomes included operation time, total postoperative drainage and time, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day and 90-day postoperative symptoms. RESULTS This study included 153 (63.5%) patients with preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and 88 (36.5%) patients without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. In patients with a preoperative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, the incidence of total postoperative complications (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.12-8.01; p = 0.028) and PPCs (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.11-15.91; p = 0.035) both increased in patients infected having surgery within 2 weeks compared with non-infection before surgery. However, patients who underwent lung resection more than 2 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis had a similar risk of postoperative complications and surgical outcomes with those non-infection before surgery. CONCLUSION This is the first study to provide evidence regarding the optimum timing of lung resection surgery and assessing early outcomes after surgery in NSCLC patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study documents that the SARS-CoV-2 infection did not complicate surgical procedures for lung cancer, and suggest that lung surgery should be postponed at least 2 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection for NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanbo Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of Western China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Western China Collaborative Innovation Center for Early Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Therapy of Lung CancerSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Lingli Niu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of Western China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Yunke Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of Western China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Western China Collaborative Innovation Center for Early Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Therapy of Lung CancerSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Zhu Wu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of Western China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Western China Collaborative Innovation Center for Early Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Therapy of Lung CancerSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Liang Xia
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Western China Collaborative Innovation Center for Early Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Therapy of Lung CancerSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Congjia Xiao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of Western China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Xu Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of Western China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Xin Xiao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Conglin Tian
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of Western China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Feng Lin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangjin Branch of Western China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Western China Collaborative Innovation Center for Early Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Therapy of Lung CancerSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Badrudin D, Lesurtel M, Shrikhande S, Gallagher T, Heinrich S, Warner S, Chaudhari V, Koo D, Anantha S, Molina V, Calvo MP, Allard MA, Doussot A, Kourdouli A, Efanov M, Oddi R, Barros-Schelotto P, Erkan M, Lidsky M, Garcia F, Gelli M, Kaldarov A, Granero P, Meurisse N, Adam R. International Hepato-Pancreato-Billiary Association (IHPBA) registry study on COVID-19 infections in HPB surgery patients. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:102-108. [PMID: 38038484 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to the pandemic, the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) developed the IHPBA-COVID Registry to capture data on HPB surgery outcomes in COVID-positive patients prior to mass vaccination programs. The aim was to provide a tool to help members gain a better understanding of the impact of COVID-19 on patient outcomes following HPB surgery worldwide. METHODS An online registry updated in real time was disseminated to all IHPBA, E-AHPBA, A-HPBA and A-PHPBA members to assess the effects of the pandemic on the outcomes of HPB procedures, perioperative COVID-19 management and other aspects of surgical care. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five patients from 35 centres in 18 countries were included. Seventy-three (58%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 preoperatively. Operative mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy and major hepatectomy was 28% and 15%, respectively, and 2.5% after cholecystectomy. Postoperative complication rates of pancreatic procedures, hepatic interventions and biliary interventions were respectively 80%, 50% and 37%. Respiratory complication rates were 37%, 31% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION This study reveals a high risk of mortality and complication after HPB surgeries in patient infected with COVID-19. The more extensive the procedure, the higher the risk. Nonetheless, an increased risk was observed across all types of interventions, suggesting that elective HPB surgery should be avoided in COVID positive patients, delaying it at distance from the viral infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Badrudin
- HPB & Transplant Surgery, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Head of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital - University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Shailesh Shrikhande
- Deputy Director and Head of Cancer Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | | | - Vikram Chaudhari
- Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Donna Koo
- Northwell Health, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Sandeep Anantha
- Director of Surgical Oncology- LIJ Forest Hills Hospital, New York, USA
| | - Víctor Molina
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marc-Antoine Allard
- Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | - Ricardo Oddi
- Center for Clinical Medical Education and Research (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Mert Erkan
- Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | - Pablo Granero
- Central University Hospital of Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - René Adam
- Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Alexandrino da Silva MF, Oliveira Portela FS, Sposato Louzada AC, Teivelis MP, Amaro Junior E, Wolosker N. National Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Analysis of the Impact of Pandemic COVID-19 on Vascular Procedures in Public Health System: 521,069 Procedures Over 4 Years. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 98:7-17. [PMID: 37717819 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.07.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a dramatic increase in healthcare demand. Resources were redirected to care patients with COVID-19. Therefore, surgical treatments were affected, including those of vascular diseases. There are no studies evaluating the whole impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, considering all types of vascular procedures, both elective and urgent, in a large country. The aim of the present study was to analyze the impact on all types of vascular procedures performed in Brazilian public hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Cross-sectional population-based analysis of publicly available data referring to vascular procedures. Surgeries 2 years before the pandemic onset (2018-2019) and 2 years during pandemic (2020-2021) were included. RESULTS We observed a total of 521,069 procedures. Decrease was observed in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs both open surgery (P = 0.001) and endovascular surgery (P < 0.001), emergency open abdominal repairs (P = 0.005), elective thoracic aortic aneurysm repairs (P = 0.007), elective open peripheral aneurysm repairs (P = 0.038), carotid endarterectomies (P < 0.001) and angioplasties (P = 0.001), open revascularizations for peripheral arterial disease (P < 0.001), surgical treatment of chronic venous disease (P < 0.001) and sympathectomies for hyperhidrosis (P < 0.001). However, there was an increase of lower limb amputations (P = 0.027) and vena cava filter placements (P = 0.005). There was a reduction of almost US$17 million in financial investments. CONCLUSIONS The reorganization of health systems led to a significant reduction in vascular procedures and decrease in financial investments. On the other hand, there was a significant increase in the number of lower limb amputations and vena cava filter placements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Fiorelli Alexandrino da Silva
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein (FICSAE), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | | | - Andressa Cristina Sposato Louzada
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein (FICSAE), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Passos Teivelis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein (FICSAE), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Edson Amaro Junior
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Nelson Wolosker
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein (FICSAE), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sharath SE, Kougias P, Daviú-Molinari T, Faridmoayer E, Berger DH. Association Between Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination and Mortality After Major Operations. Ann Surg 2024; 279:58-64. [PMID: 37497640 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare postoperative 90-day mortality between (1) fully vaccinated patients with COVID-19-positive and negative diagnosis, and (2) vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with COVID-19 positive diagnosis. BACKGROUND Societal guidelines recommend postponing elective operations for at least 7 weeks in unvaccinated patients with preoperative coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. The role of vaccination in this infection-operation time risk is unclear. METHODS We conducted a national US multicenter retrospective, matched cohort study spanning July 2021 to October 2022. Participants were included if they underwent a high-risk general, vascular, orthopedic, neurosurgery, or genitourinary surgery. All-cause mortality occurring within 90 days of the index operation was the primary outcome. Inverse probability treatment weighted propensity scores were used to adjust logistic regression models examining the independent and interactive associations between mortality, exposure status, and infection proximity. RESULTS Of 3401 fully vaccinated patients in the 8-week preoperative period, 437 (12.9%) were COVID-19-positive. Unadjusted mortality rates were not significantly different between vaccinated patients with COVID-19 (22, 5.0%) and vaccinated patients without COVID-19 (99, 3.3%; P = 0.07). After inverse probability treatment weighted adjustment, mortality risk was not significantly different between vaccinated COVID-19-positive patients compared to vaccinated patients without COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.70, 2.72). The proximity of COVID-19 diagnosis to the index operation did not confer added mortality risk in either comparison cohort. CONCLUSIONS Contrary to risks observed among unvaccinated patients, postoperative mortality does not differ between patients with and without COVID-19 when vaccinated against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus and receiving a high-risk operation within 8 weeks of the diagnosis, regardless of operation timing relative to diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherene E Sharath
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY
- Operative Care Line/Research Service Line, New York Harbor VA Health Care System, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Panos Kougias
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY
- Operative Care Line/Research Service Line, New York Harbor VA Health Care System, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Tomás Daviú-Molinari
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Erfan Faridmoayer
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY
| | - David H Berger
- Department of Surgery, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gupta E, Ng AH, de Moraes AR, Fu JB, Tennison JM, Ahmed M, Fellman BM, Bruera E. Changes in Patterns of Referral for Inpatient Rehabilitation Cancer Patients Due to COVID-19: A Retrospective Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 103:62-65. [PMID: 37602564 PMCID: PMC10840623 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT There is a paucity of literature on the effect of COVID-19 on hospital processes. We hypothesized that COVID-19 was associated with decreased cancer physiatry referrals in 2020. This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients from April to July 2019 and 2020 admitted at an academic quaternary cancer center. The main outcomes were number of hospital admissions, rate, and characteristics of inpatient rehabilitation admissions and change in percentage of physiatry referrals as the primary endpoint. Results showed that in 2019, there were 387 referrals from 10,274 inpatient admissions (3.8%; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-4.2), compared with 337 referrals from 7051 admissions in 2020 (4.8%; 95% confidence interval, 4.3-5.3, P = 0.001). Hematology services referred more patients than neurosurgery in 2020 (20.4% vs. 31.4%; 48.2% vs. 26.5%, P = 0.01). Discharge disposition reflected an increased frequency of return to acute care service in 2020 (10.2% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.03). In conclusion, there was an increase in the rate of physiatry referrals despite a decrease in hospital admissions. There was an increase in referrals by hematology, likely due to emphasis on safe discharge and the populations hospitalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekta Gupta
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Amy H. Ng
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Aline Rozman de Moraes
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Jack B. Fu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Jegy M Tennison
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| | - Maaheen Ahmed
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 7200 Cambridge, Suite 10B, Houston, TX 77030. Phone # 713-798-3518. Present address: University of Michigan, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 100, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-5744. Phone # 734-936-7175. Fax # 734-764-9439
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1411, Houston, TX 77030. Phone #713-745-2341
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Palliative Medicine, Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1414, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Phone #: 713-745-2327. Fax #: 713-892-6092
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mohammadi Tofigh A, Hasanzade A, Haghbin Toutounchi A, Khoshnoudi H, Aghaei M. Emergency laparotomy and perioperative COVID-19: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Updates Surg 2023:10.1007/s13304-023-01730-1. [PMID: 38147291 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01730-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
Concerning the perioperative outcomes of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who underwent emergency laparotomy, more data must be collected. Because COVID-19 can affect multiple organs, cause various complications, and act as a risk factor for surgery, in this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of emergency laparotomy between SARS-CoV-2 infected and uninfected patients. This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent emergency laparotomy from December 2021 to December 2022. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with and without confirmed perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative intensive care unit admission, hospital length of stay, re-operation, and postoperative complications. Data were analyzed by SPSS statistic version 27. In this study, 50 patients in the COVID-19 group and 91 patients in the non-COVID-19 group were assessed. The 30-day mortality in the COVID-19 group was significantly higher than in the non-COVID-19 group (34% vs. 12.1%, respectively, P = 0.004). Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (64% vs. 26.4%, P < 0.001). The frequency of ICU admission and need for re-operation were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (P = 0.003 and P = 0.039, respectively). Length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the non-COVID-19 group (P = 0.021). In patients with confirmed COVID-19, emergency laparotomy is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Additionally, emergency laparotomy is associated with increasing postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, intensive care admission, and additional surgery requirement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Mohammadi Tofigh
- Department of General Surgery, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arman Hasanzade
- Department of General Surgery, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Haghbin Toutounchi
- Department of General Surgery, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hojatolah Khoshnoudi
- Department of General Surgery, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Aghaei
- Department of General Surgery, Imam Hossein Medical and Educational Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Geropoulos G, Moschonas S, Fanariotis G, Koltsida A, Madouros N, Koumadoraki E, Katsikas Triantafyllidis K, Kechagias KS, Koimtzis G, Giannis D, Notopoulos A, Pavlidis ET, Psarras K. Anastomotic Leak and Perioperative Outcomes of Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 60:31. [PMID: 38256292 PMCID: PMC10818348 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic influenced the healthcare system tremendously, as well as the number of elective surgical procedures worldwide. The aim of this study is to investigate the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on esophagectomies. Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar bibliographical databases were systematically searched. Original clinical studies investigating the outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic were deemed eligible. After exclusion criteria were applied, eight studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Results: Eight studies with non-overlapping populations, reporting on patients undergoing esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, were included in our analysis, with a total of 18548 patients. Background characteristics for age, lung disease, smoking history as well as Body Mass Index and age were equal among the groups. The background of diabetes presented a statistically significant difference among the groups. Perioperative outcomes like reoperation rates, the length of intensive care unit stay, or readmission rates were not significantly increased during the pandemic. The 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality were not affected either. The length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the non-pandemic period. Conclusions: The results of our study support the evidence that in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, esophageal cancer operations took place safely and effectively, similarly to the standards of the non-COVID-19 era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Geropoulos
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Stavros Moschonas
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 15123 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (A.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Georgios Fanariotis
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 15123 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (A.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Aggeliki Koltsida
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 15123 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (A.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Nikolaos Madouros
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 15123 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (A.K.); (E.K.)
| | - Evgenia Koumadoraki
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, 15123 Athens, Greece; (S.M.); (A.K.); (E.K.)
| | | | - Konstantinos S. Kechagias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge UB8 3NN, UK
| | - Georgios Koimtzis
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK;
| | - Dimitrios Giannis
- Department of Surgery, Flushing Hospital Medical Center, Flushing, NY 11355, USA;
| | - Athanasios Notopoulos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Efstathios T. Pavlidis
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Kyriakos Psarras
- Second Surgical Propedeutic Department, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yamamoto C, Nukui Y, Furukawa K, Taniguchi M, Yamano T, Inaba T, Kikai R, Tanino Y, Yamada Y, Teramukai S, Takayama K. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR as a universal screening on planned admission in asymptomatic patients. J Infect Chemother 2023:S1341-321X(23)00314-8. [PMID: 38135218 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Universal screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on admission is reportedly beneficial in preventing nosocomial infections. However, some issues remain, including low positivity rate, cost, and time required for testing. We describe SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for universal screening in asymptomatic patients on planned admissions. In total, 14,574 patients were included between October 12, 2020, and June 23, 2022. The PCR-positive rate for the period was 0.44 % (64/14,574). The PCR positivity for the epidemic period by strain was 0.28 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.56 %), 0.16 % (95 % CI 0.05-0.37 %), 0.21 % (95 % CI 0.09-0.41 %), and 0.9 % (95 % CI 0.65-1.2 %) for the wild-type strain, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants, respectively. The proportion of Ct values < 30 was higher in the first half of the epidemic (first vs. second, 29.4 % [95 % CI 16.9-44.8 %] vs. 16.7 % [95 % CI 6.0-28.5 %]), whereas that of Ct values ≥ 35 increased significantly in the second half (first vs. second, 32.4 % [95 % CI 19.3-47.8 %] vs. 70.0 % [95 % CI 53.5-83.4 %]). Of all positives, 50 % (32/64) had a coronavirus disease (COVID-19) history before PCR screening, with a median of 28 days (10-105) from COVID-19 onset or positive to PCR screening. PCR screening may help detect positives with high viral loads early in the epidemic for each mutant strain, with an increasing proportion of positives with low viral loads later in the epidemic. PCR testing may be unnecessary for recently diagnosed cases and patients in whom reinfection is unlikely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chie Yamamoto
- Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Yoko Nukui
- Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Keitaro Furukawa
- Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Tetsuhiro Yamano
- Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tohru Inaba
- Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Rie Kikai
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoko Tanino
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yukiji Yamada
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoshi Teramukai
- Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
| | - Koichi Takayama
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hayden MK, Hanson KE, Englund JA, Lee MJ, Loeb M, Lee F, Morgan DJ, Patel R, El Mikati IK, Iqneibi S, Alabed F, Amarin JZ, Mansour R, Patel P, Falck-Ytter Y, Morgan RL, Murad MH, Sultan S, Bhimraj A, Mustafa RA. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Molecular Diagnostic Testing. Clin Infect Dis 2023:ciad646. [PMID: 38112284 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate molecular diagnostic tests are necessary for confirming a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and for identifying asymptomatic carriage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The number of available SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection tests continues to increase as does the COVID-19 diagnostic literature. Thus, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) developed an evidence-based diagnostic guideline to assist clinicians, clinical laboratorians, patients, and policymakers in decisions related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests. In addition, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding molecular diagnostic test performance, discuss nuances of test result interpretation in a variety of practice settings, and highlight important unmet research needs related to COVID-19 diagnostic testing. IDSA convened a multidisciplinary panel of infectious diseases clinicians, clinical microbiologists, and experts in systematic literature review to identify and prioritize clinical questions and outcomes related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make testing recommendations. The panel agreed on 12 diagnostic recommendations. Access to accurate SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing is critical for patient care, hospital infection prevention, and the public health response to COVID-19 infection. Information on the clinical performance of available tests continues to grow, but the quality of evidence of the current literature to support this updated molecular diagnostic guideline remains moderate to very low. Recognizing these limitations, the IDSA panel weighed available diagnostic evidence and recommends nucleic acid testing for all symptomatic individuals suspected of having COVID-19. In addition, testing is suggested for asymptomatic individuals with known or suspected contact with a COVID-19 case when the results will impact isolation/quarantine/personal protective equipment (PPE) usage decisions. Evidence in support of rapid testing and testing of upper respiratory specimens other than nasopharyngeal swabs, which offer logistical advantages, is sufficient to warrant conditional recommendations in favor of these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary K Hayden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kimberly E Hanson
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Janet A Englund
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mark J Lee
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mark Loeb
- Division of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francesca Lee
- Departments of Pathology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel J Morgan
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Robin Patel
- Division of Clinical Microbiology and Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ibrahim K El Mikati
- Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Shahad Iqneibi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Farouk Alabed
- School of Medicine, The University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Justin Z Amarin
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Razan Mansour
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Payal Patel
- Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine and Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yngve Falck-Ytter
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Rebecca L Morgan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Adarsh Bhimraj
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Center of Excellence for Infectious Diseases, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Reem A Mustafa
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Walters ET, Palackic A, Franco-Mesa C, Shah NR, Erickson MJ, Wolf SE. The impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes of burn patients. Burns Trauma 2023; 11:tkad042. [PMID: 38074193 PMCID: PMC10699731 DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkad042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Background Multiple studies have shown the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) to be associated with deleterious outcomes in a wide range of patients. The impact of COVID-19 has not been well investigated among burned patients. We suspect that patients will have worsened respiratory and thrombotic complications, ultimately leading to increased mortality. The objective of this study is to determine the impact a concurrent infection of COVID-19 has on clinical outcomes after a burn injury. Methods This is a retrospective, propensity matched, cohort study. We examined a de-identified database of electronic medical records of over 75 million patients across 75 health care associations in the United States for patients treated for thermal burns from 1 January 2020, to 31 July 2021, and those who also were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection within one day before or after injury based on International Classification of Disease, tenth revision (ICD-10) codes. Study participants included adults who were treated for a burn injury during the study period. Results We included 736 patients with burn injury and concomitant COVID-19 infection matched to 736 patients with burn injury and no concurrent COVID-19 infection (total 1472 patients, mean age 36.3 ± 24.3). We found no significant increase in mortality observed for patients with concurrent COVID-19 (OR 1.203, 95% CI 0.517-2.803; p = 0.6675). We did observe significant increase in infections (OR 3.537, 95% CI 2.798-4.471; p = 0.0001), thrombotic complications (OR 2.342, 95% CI 1.351-4.058; p = 0.0018), as was the incidence of hypertrophic scarring (OR 3.368, 95% CI 2.326-4.877; p = 0.0001). Conclusions We observed that concurrent COVID-19 infection was associated with an increase in infections, thrombosis and hypertrophic scarring but no increase in mortality in our cohort of burn patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot T Walters
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Alen Palackic
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University, Galveston, TX, USA
- Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Camila Franco-Mesa
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Nikhil R Shah
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Michael J Erickson
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Steven E Wolf
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Compagnoni R, Cucchi D, Klumpp R, Ronga M, Berruto M, Di Giacomo G, Randelli PS. Operational strategies to deal with the COVID-19 emergency: recommendations from the Italian national society SIAGASCOT following the introduction of vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Musculoskelet Surg 2023; 107:471-479. [PMID: 37658981 PMCID: PMC10709259 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-023-00796-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article aims to present the operational recommendations adopted by the Italian national society for orthopaedic surgery, arthroscopy, and sports medicine (SIAGASCOT) in managing patients eligible to undergo elective orthopaedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic after the beginning of a national vaccination campaign. MATERIALS AND METHODS An extensive literature search, analysing medical databases and scientific societies protocols, was performed to support this document. A four-step approach was used: 1-definition of priorities; 2-definition of significant clusters of interventions; 3-extraction of recommendations from international literature; and 4-adaptation of the recommendations to the specific features of the Italian healthcare system. RESULTS Three operational priorities were defined ("continuity of care and containment of the virus spread", "examination of waiting lists", and "definition of the role of vaccines"), six significant clusters of intervention were identified, and recommendations regarding the risk management for healthcare staff and hospital facility as well as the preoperative, in-hospital, and postoperative management were produced. Patient selection, preoperative screening, and pre-hospitalization procedures, which are regarded as pivotal roles in the safe management of patients eligible to undergo elective orthopaedic surgery, were analysed extensively. CONCLUSIONS This document presents national-wide recommendations for managing patients eligible to undergo elective orthopaedic surgery with the beginning of the vaccination campaign. This paper could be the basis for similar documents adapted to the local healthcare systems in other countries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Compagnoni
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via della Commenda 10, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Cucchi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Raymond Klumpp
- Reparto di Ortopedia e Traumatologia dell`Ospedale di Treviglio-Caravaggio, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Piazzale Ospedale Luigi Meneguzzo, 24047, Treviglio, Italy
| | - Mario Ronga
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Operative Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara - Italy. "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Corso Mazzini n.18, 28100, Novara, Italy
| | - Massimo Berruto
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Giacomo
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Concordia Hospital for Special Surgery, 00145, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro S Randelli
- 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO, Piazza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Adams AJ, Dohse N, Miller A, Tosti R. Pulmonary Complications and Mortality in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Undergoing Elective and Emergent Hand Surgery. J Hand Microsurg 2023; 15:371-375. [PMID: 38152673 PMCID: PMC10751195 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1760765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients acutely infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may have increased risk for postsurgical pulmonary complications and mortality, particularly with general anesthesia. Surgery is often delayed to mitigate risk; however, excessive delays may result in morbidity. Optimal criteria for delaying surgery in patients with or without symptoms are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate any complications following hand surgery in patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with a positive polymerase chain reaction test within 60 days before or after hand surgery between March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Patients were telephoned also to supplement records. Type of surgery, type of anesthesia, comorbidities, timing of surgery, onset of symptoms, and complications were recorded. Results We identified 21 patients undergoing 26 procedures, of which 21 (81%) were emergency procedures and 5 (19%) were elective. Mean age was 37 years (range: 17-71). General anesthesia was used in 88% of cases, with mean duration of 110 minutes. SARS-CoV-2 was diagnosed on average 6 days preoperatively (range: 39 days preop-14 days postop). Positive tests were usually identified preoperatively (50%), versus day-of-surgery (25%) or postoperatively (25%). Patients were symptomatic in only 27% of cases, and completely asymptomatic in 73%. No asymptomatic patients developed complications. One patient suffered a fracture malunion after delayed surgery. Pulmonary complications were noted in 3 patients; all had prior pulmonary disease and underwent emergency surgeries under general anesthesia. Overall mortality rate was 0%. Conclusion Pulmonary complications and mortality are low following hand surgery in asymptomatic patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J. Adams
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Nicolas Dohse
- Philadelphia Hand to Shoulder Center, Thomas Jefferson University, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Andrew Miller
- Philadelphia Hand to Shoulder Center, Thomas Jefferson University, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Rick Tosti
- Philadelphia Hand to Shoulder Center, Thomas Jefferson University, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Das G, Talukdar A, Bhutia K, Talukdar A. Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Cancer with COVID-19 in the Postoperative Period. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:876-880. [PMID: 38187838 PMCID: PMC10766581 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-023-01797-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of our study was to report about the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent major surgery for cancer and developed COVID-19 in the postoperative period. A retrospective and observational study was done in the Surgical Oncology Division of a tertiary care cancer hospital in North-East India. The study period was from 1st April 2020 to 31st December 2021. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cancer who underwent a major surgery and developed COVID-19 in the postoperative period, within the same hospital stay were included in the study. Data was obtained from a prospectively maintained database and case records. Descriptive statistics were used to state the results in median values, range and percentages. A total of 22 patients developed COVID-19 in the postoperative period during the study period out of a total of 1402 patients operated during that time period (1.57%). The have been followed up for a median period of 16 months (range 2 to 18 months). The median age at presentation was 50 years (range 25 to 74 years). The incidence of co-morbidities was 27.3%. The median duration of ICU stay was 3 days (range 0 to 9 days) and median duration of hospital stay was 22 days (range 9 to 55 days).. The postoperative mortality rate was 18.2%. COVID-19 in the postoperative period in patients undergoing major abdominal and thoracic surgeries for cancer caused high postoperative mortality and prolonged hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Das
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute (a unit of Tata Memorial Centre), Room No. 30, AK Azad Road, Gopinath Nagar, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India
| | - Amrita Talukdar
- Department of Microbiology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute (a unit of Tata Memorial Centre), AK Azad Road, Gopinath Nagar, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India
| | - Karma Bhutia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute (a unit of Tata Memorial Centre), Room No. 30, AK Azad Road, Gopinath Nagar, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India
| | - Abhijit Talukdar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute (a unit of Tata Memorial Centre), Room No. 28, AK Azad Road, Gopinath Nagar, Guwahati, Assam 781016 India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Levitt EB, Patch DA, Hess MC, Terrero A, Jaeger B, Haendel MA, Chute CG, Yeager MT, Ponce BA, Theiss SM, Spitler CA, Johnson JP. Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with orthopaedic fracture surgery in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). Injury 2023; 54:111092. [PMID: 37871347 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of COVID-19-positive patients undergoing orthopaedic fracture surgery using data from a national database of U.S. adults with a COVID-19 test for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study using data from a national database to compare orthopaedic fracture surgery outcomes between COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients in the United States. Participants aged 18-99 with orthopaedic fracture surgery between March and December 2020 were included. The main exposure was COVID-19 status. Outcomes included perioperative complications, 30-day all-cause mortality, and overall all-cause mortality. Multivariable adjusted models were fitted to determine the association of COVID-positivity with all-cause mortality. RESULTS The total population of 6.5 million patient records was queried, identifying 76,697 participants with a fracture. There were 7,628 participants in the National COVID Cohort who had a fracture and operative management. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in the COVID-19-positive group (n = 476, 6.2 %) than the COVID-19-negative group (n = 7,152, 93.8 %) (2.2 vs 1.4, p<0.001). The COVID-19-positive group had higher mortality (13.2 % vs 5.2 %, p<0.001) than the COVID-19-negative group with higher odds of death in the fully adjusted model (Odds Ratio=1.59; 95 % Confidence Interval: 1.16-2.18). CONCLUSION COVID-19-positive participants with a fracture requiring surgery had higher mortality and perioperative complications than COVID-19-negative patients in this national cohort of U.S. adults tested for COVID-19. The risks associated with COVID-19 can guide potential treatment options and counseling of patients and their families. Future studies can be conducted as data accumulates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eli B Levitt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA; Department of Translational Medicine, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - David A Patch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Matthew C Hess
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Alfredo Terrero
- Department of Translational Medicine, Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Translational Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Miami Miller, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Byron Jaeger
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Melissa A Haendel
- Center for Health AI, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Christopher G Chute
- Schools of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew T Yeager
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Steven M Theiss
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Clay A Spitler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Joey P Johnson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Momeeh MY, Alrumayh MM, Ahmed K, Alharbi FL. Postoperative Complications in Patients With the Preoperative COVID-19 Infection at King Fahad Specialist Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e50037. [PMID: 38186544 PMCID: PMC10768319 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a new coronavirus strain. Indeed, the timing of COVID-19 infection before surgery plays an important role in the surgery outcomes and complications. OBJECTIVE In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of postoperative complications for patients who underwent surgery with previous COVID-19 infection. METHODOLOGY This was a retrospective hospital-based study which was conducted on 75 patients who had been infected with COVID-19 and underwent surgery. RESULTS We included 75 patients. The time between COVID-19 infection and the surgery was from one to six months in 52% of patients, 24% of patients were more than six months, and 24% of patients were less than one month. In this study, most of the patients had no complications (77.3%) while 22.7% of patients had complications that were mainly respiratory (n= 13). The overall mortality in our study was 5.3%. There was a significant association between comorbidity and postoperative complications, and the status of COVID-19 preoperative and postoperative complications (p < 0.01) but not patients' age as well as the type of anesthesia and postoperative complication (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Respiratory complications were the most common postoperative complications in patients who had surgery after COVID-19 infection. Comorbidity and COVID-19 status were significantly associated with higher postoperative complications. Mortality was relatively small. We recommend extreme care to patients with COVID-19 infection prior to surgery to decrease the COVID-19 hazards that develop post-surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Khiloud Ahmed
- Anesthesia, Maternity and Children Hospital, Buraidah, SAU
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kim IK, Kwag SJ, Kim HG, Ju YT, Lee SJ, Park TJ, Jeong SH, Jung EJ, Lee JK. Perioperative considerations for acute appendicitis in patients with COVID-19 infection: two case reports. Ann Coloproctol 2023; 39:521-525. [PMID: 34871490 PMCID: PMC10781601 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2021.00647.0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We report considerations related with surgery through 2 cases of acute apendicitis with COVID-19 infection. In November and December 2020, two patients infected with COVID-19 developed acute apendicitis and underwent emergency surgery. In case 1, an 84-year-old woman was asymptomatic and diagnosed with acute apendicitis on the 20th day of infection. She was discharged after surgery without complication. In contrast, case 2 was a 69-year-old male patient with pneumonia treated with antibiotics, steroids and remdesivir. After surgery, he was hospitalized for a long duration due to persistent pneumonia and wound complications. We should perform appendectomy in well-established negative pressure operating rooms, personal protective equipment, and protocols. Since the physical examination and blood tests were limited, image examination like computed tomography scan should be considered if acute apendicitis is suspected. If the patient has pneumonia before surgery, it can get worse after surgery, and complications such as wound infections can occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In-Kyeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| | - Seung-jin Kwag
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Han-Gil Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Young-Tae Ju
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea
| | - Seung-Jun Lee
- Department of Convergence Medical Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea
| | - Tae-Jin Park
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| | - Sang-Ho Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| | - Eun-Jung Jung
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| | - Jin-Kwon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zhang F, Di L, Jiang S, Wang S, Tian MW, Liang Z, Wu W, Li Y, Zhang J, Huang L. Eligibility for elective surgery in patients recovering from mild COVID-19: A propensity-matched analysis. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1219-1226. [PMID: 37638392 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the timing of surgery after a recent Omicron variant infection, to provide a reference for policymakers, clinicians, and patients. METHODS This single-center propensity-matched analysis was designed and reported according to the EQUATOR-STROBE guidelines. Patients recovering from COVID-19 infection were divided into three groups based on the period from disappearance of respiratory symptoms to surgery: ≤7 days, 8-14 days, and >14 days groups. Outcome measures included postoperative respiratory complications, vascular thrombosis, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and mortality. RESULTS Between August 1 and December 31, 2022, 9023 surgical procedures were performed, of which 7490 surgeries met the inclusion criteria. Propensity matching resulted in a final cohort of 227 patients recovered from COVID-19 and 2043 SARS-CoV-2 negative patients. Compared with the SARS-CoV-2 negative group, the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications was significantly higher (15.91% vs. 6.71%, p = 0.028) only in the ≤7 days group. There were no statistically significant differences in the other 30-day outcomes between the SARS-CoV-2 negative and the three COVID-19 recovery groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients who have recovered from mild COVID-19 may be eligible for elective surgery at least 7 days after recovery, since they do not have an increased risk of postoperative complications or mortality within 30 days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuzhen Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Lichao Di
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Sufang Jiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Shizhao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Meng-Wu Tian
- Department of Critical Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi Liang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenhao Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiaqi Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Lining Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
García-Botella A, De la Serna Esteban S, López-Antoñanzas L, Avellana-Moreno R, Dziakova J, Cano Valderrama O, Martín-Antona E, Serrano-García I, Torres García AJ. Lessons Learned in Elective Surgeries After 6 Pandemic Waves of SARS-CoV-2. A Single European Center Experience. World J Surg 2023; 47:2958-2965. [PMID: 37875666 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07222-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reported high surgical morbidity and mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 prompted preoperative screening and modification of surgical protocols. Although vaccination and treatment of COVID-19 have resulted in lower hospitalization rates and infection severity, publications on postoperative results have not been updated. The aim of the study was to analyze the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery in two periods with high incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, before and after vaccination. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgery in two periods: March-June 2020 (Group2020) and December 2021-February 2022 (Group2022) (after massive vaccination). RESULTS In total, 618 patients who underwent surgery were included in the analysis (Group2020: 343 vs. Group2022: 275). Significantly more oncological procedures were performed in Group2020, and there were no differences in postoperative complications. Nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in 4 patients in Group2020 and 1 patient in Group2022. In Group 2022, 70 patients (25.4%) had COVID-19 prior to surgery, and 68 (97.1%) were vaccinated. Comparative analysis between patients with past COVID-19 and those without showed no difference in postoperative morbidity and mortality. According to the time elapsed between SARS-CoV-2 infection and surgery (≤ 7 or > 7 weeks), comparative analysis showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION The establishment of preoperative screening protocols for SARS-CoV-2 infection results in a low incidence of nosocomial infection and optimal postoperative outcomes. Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated patients was not associated with increased postoperative complications, even in shorter periods after infection. In surgical patients, individualized preoperative evaluation after SARS-CoV-2 infection may be more important than strict time limitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra García-Botella
- Surgery Department (HepatoPancreatoBiliary Unit), Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
- Department of Surgery, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Sofía De la Serna Esteban
- Surgery Department (HepatoPancreatoBiliary Unit), Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Leyre López-Antoñanzas
- Surgery Department (HepatoPancreatoBiliary Unit), Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocío Avellana-Moreno
- Surgery Department (HepatoPancreatoBiliary Unit), Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jana Dziakova
- Surgery Department (HepatoPancreatoBiliary Unit), Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Oscar Cano Valderrama
- Department of Surgery, Vigo; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias Galicia Sur, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
| | - Esteban Martín-Antona
- Surgery Department (HepatoPancreatoBiliary Unit), Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Serrano-García
- IdISSC, Methodological Research Support Unit, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio José Torres García
- Surgery Department (HepatoPancreatoBiliary Unit), Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Del Rey de Diego P, Martínez García E, Tormo de Las Heras C, García Fernández E. Adaptation to a monography pediatric hospital of the recommendations for the early detection of active COVID-19 infection prior to hospital admission, performance of diagnostic tests and surgical procedures. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed) 2023; 70:608-609. [PMID: 37678463 DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- P Del Rey de Diego
- Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
| | - E Martínez García
- Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Tormo de Las Heras
- Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - E García Fernández
- Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Payton O, Prakash R, Shaikh A, Hassan MF, Haleem S. Experience of Spinal Surgery for the Over 70s During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Referral Centre in the United Kingdom and Ramifications for Future Management. Cureus 2023; 15:e51017. [PMID: 38264388 PMCID: PMC10804174 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to assess the safety of our spinal surgery pathways for patients over the age of 70 years during the COVID-19 pandemic, to guide future management. METHODS A retrospective, single-centre, observational cohort study of all patients over 70 years of age undergoing spinal surgery between June 1 to September 30, 2020, was performed. All patients were stratified by the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) COVID-19 Patient Risk Assessment Tool. RESULTS A total of 64 operations on 59 patients were performed. The BOA risk assessment placed 67.8% of patients (n=40) in the high or very high-risk category. A total of 60% of patients (n=36) were over 75 years old. All patients had at least one other comorbidity. Following our green, amber, and red pathways, we had no cases of post-operative COVID-19 on an average follow-up of 71 days. CONCLUSION Our study illustrates safe pathways for spinal surgery on patients over 70 years old during the first wave of COVID-19. Risk assessment tools should be used with caution, as age over 65 years was immediately medium-risk. This study would be a useful guide in the management of all elderly patients requiring surgery in the face of further COVID-19 variants or a similar pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Payton
- Spinal Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, GBR
| | - Rohan Prakash
- Spinal Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, GBR
| | - Adnan Shaikh
- Spinal Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, GBR
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rohatgi N. JMIR Perioperative Medicine: A Global Journal for Publishing Interdisciplinary Innovations, Research, and Perspectives. JMIR Perioper Med 2023; 6:e54344. [PMID: 37988142 DOI: 10.2196/54344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
JMIR Perioperative Medicine supports the dissemination of technological and data science-driven innovative research conducted by interdisciplinary teams in perioperative medicine. We invite contributions on a broad range of topics from clinicians, scientists, and allied health professionals from across the globe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Rohatgi
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Farhat F, Sohail SS, Alam MT, Ubaid S, Shakil, Ashhad M, Madsen DØ. COVID-19 and beyond: leveraging artificial intelligence for enhanced outbreak control. Front Artif Intell 2023; 6:1266560. [PMID: 38028660 PMCID: PMC10663297 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1266560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 has brought significant changes to our political, social, and technological landscape. This paper explores the emergence and global spread of the disease and focuses on the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in containing its transmission. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no scientific presentation of the early pictorial representation of the disease's spread. Additionally, we outline various domains where AI has made a significant impact during the pandemic. Our methodology involves searching relevant articles on COVID-19 and AI in leading databases such as PubMed and Scopus to identify the ways AI has addressed pandemic-related challenges and its potential for further assistance. While research suggests that AI has not fully realized its potential against COVID-19, likely due to data quality and diversity limitations, we review and identify key areas where AI has been crucial in preparing the fight against any sudden outbreak of the pandemic. We also propose ways to maximize the utilization of AI's capabilities in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiza Farhat
- Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
| | | | - Mohammed Talha Alam
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
| | - Syed Ubaid
- Faculty of Electronic and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Shakil
- Faculty of Electronic and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mohd Ashhad
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
| | - Dag Øivind Madsen
- USN School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway, Hønefoss, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bubberman JM, Claessen J, Feijen MMW, Meesters-Caberg MAJ, Van Kuijk SMJ, Van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. COVID-associated complications after reconstructive breast surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:257-265. [PMID: 37507518 PMCID: PMC10505595 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07064-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The COVID pandemic significantly influenced reconstructive breast surgery regimens. Many surgeries were cancelled or postponed. COVID entails not only respiratory, but also coagulative symptoms. It, therefore, potentially increases the risk of postoperative complications. The incidence of perioperative COVID infection and its influence on postoperative recovery after reconstructive breast surgery is still unknown. METHODS This dual center retrospective cohort study included patients that underwent reconstructive breast surgery between March 2020 and July 2021. Post-mastectomy autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction (ABR; IBR), as well as post-lumpectomy oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction (PBR) were eligible. Patient data were extracted from electronic medical records. Data regarding COVID-19 infection was collected through a questionnaire. The primary outcome was complication rate. RESULTS The ABR, IBR and PBR groups consisted of 113 (12 COVID-positive), 41 (2 COVID-positive) and 113 (10 COVID-positive) patients. In the ABR and PBR groups, postoperative complications occurred significantly more often in patients with perioperative COVID-infection. Especially impaired wound healing occurred significantly more often in the ABR and PBR breasts, but also at the donor site of ABR patients with perioperative COVID. CONCLUSION Perioperative COVID-infection increases susceptibility to complicated wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery. A possible explanation lies in the dysregulation of haemostasis by the virus, and its direct effects on microvasculature. A hypercoagulable state results. We recommend to postpone elective breast surgery for 4-6 weeks after COVID-19 infection. Also, precautionary measures remain important to minimize the risk of perioperative COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Bubberman
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J Claessen
- Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M M W Feijen
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - M A J Meesters-Caberg
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - S M J Van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R R W J Van der Hulst
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S M H Tuinder
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zuberi S, Mushtaq Y, Patel K, Vickramarajah S, Askari A, Rashid F, Gurprashad R. COVID-19 Diagnosis in Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain Without Respiratory Symptoms: A UK Emergency General Surgical Unit Experience. Am Surg 2023; 89:4406-4412. [PMID: 35818960 PMCID: PMC9277312 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221114033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent evidence has emerged reporting atypical clinical symptoms of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). There is a sparsity of existing studies examining COVID-19-related abdominal pain and the role of investigative imaging for the virus in these patients. Study aims were to determine COVID-19 incidence in those with acute abdominal pain in the absence of respiratory symptoms and to assess the diagnostic performance of CT thoracic imaging in such patients. METHODS Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients admitted to our emergency general surgical unit between 1st March 2020 and 31st May 2020 was performed. In adherence with national guidelines, all patients underwent nasal and oro-pharyngeal COVID-19 RT-PCR swabs as well as thoracic and abdominal computed tomography (CT) on admission. RESULTS From 112 patients admitted with acute abdominal pain in the absence of respiratory symptoms, 16 (14.3%) tested positive for COVID-19 on RT-PCR swab testing. Overall, 50% (8/16) of these patients had no intra-abdominal pathology on CT. The sensitivity and specificity of CT thoracic imaging for diagnosing COVID-19 was 43.8% and 91.7%, respectively. Patients with positive COVID-19 swabs had higher C-reactive protein levels, lower potassium levels and a higher proportion of those with a low lymphocyte count. DISCUSSION One in seven patients with abdominal pain without any respiratory symptoms tested positive for COVID-19. Half of these patients represented COVID-19 manifesting primarily as acute abdominal pain. Combined swab testing and CT imaging should be performed in all abdominal pain presentations due to the varying diagnostic performance of thoracic CT in diagnosing COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharukh Zuberi
- Department of General Surgery, Luton & Dunstable University
Hospital, Luton, UK
| | - Yusuf Mushtaq
- Department of General Surgery, Luton & Dunstable University
Hospital, Luton, UK
| | - Krashna Patel
- Department of General Surgery, Luton & Dunstable University
Hospital, Luton, UK
| | | | - Alan Askari
- Department of General Surgery, Luton & Dunstable University
Hospital, Luton, UK
| | - Farhan Rashid
- Department of General Surgery, Luton & Dunstable University
Hospital, Luton, UK
| | - Roy Gurprashad
- Department of General Surgery, Luton & Dunstable University
Hospital, Luton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Verhagen NB, SenthilKumar G, Jaraczewski T, Koerber NK, Merrill JR, Flitcroft MA, Szabo A, Banerjee A, Yang X, Taylor BW, Figueroa Castro CE, Yen TW, Clarke CN, Lauer K, Pfeifer KJ, Gould JC, Kothari AN. Severity of Prior Coronavirus Disease 2019 is Associated With Postoperative Outcomes After Major Inpatient Surgery. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e949-e956. [PMID: 37476995 PMCID: PMC10659141 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine how the severity of prior history (Hx) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection influences postoperative outcomes after major elective inpatient surgery. BACKGROUND Surgical guidelines instituted early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic recommended a delay in surgery of up to 8 weeks after an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. This was based on the observation of elevated surgical risk after recovery from COVID-19 early in the pandemic. As the pandemic shifts to an endemic phase, it is unclear whether this association remains, especially for those recovering from asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19. METHODS Utilizing the National COVID Cohort Collaborative, we assessed postoperative outcomes for adults with and without a Hx of COVID-19 who underwent major elective inpatient surgery between January 2020 and February 2023. COVID-19 severity and time from infection to surgery were each used as independent variables in multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS This study included 387,030 patients, of whom 37,354 (9.7%) were diagnosed with preoperative COVID-19. Hx of COVID-19 was found to be an independent risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes even after a 12-week delay for patients with moderate and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with mild COVID-19 did not have an increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes at any time point. Vaccination decreased the odds of respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS Impact of COVID-19 on postoperative outcomes is dependent on the severity of illness, with only moderate and severe disease leading to a higher risk of adverse outcomes. Existing perioperative policies should be updated to include consideration of COVID-19 disease severity and vaccination status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel B. Verhagen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Gopika SenthilKumar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
- Department of Physiology and Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Taylor Jaraczewski
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Nicolas K. Koerber
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Jennifer R. Merrill
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Madelyn A. Flitcroft
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Aniko Szabo
- Department of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Anjishnu Banerjee
- Department of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Xin Yang
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeastern Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Bradley W. Taylor
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeastern Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Carlos E. Figueroa Castro
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Tina W.F. Yen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Callisia N. Clarke
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Kathryn Lauer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Kurt J. Pfeifer
- Department of Medicine, Section of Perioperative & Consultative Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Jon C. Gould
- Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and GI Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Anai N. Kothari
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeastern Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| |
Collapse
|