Improvement in use of best practice in the care of patients with oral mucositis in a comprehensive cancer center in Iran: a best practice implementation case study

Assessment and management of radiation-induced trismus in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a best practice implementation project

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the most commonly used radiotherapy technology in oncology, which enables precise conformation of the radiation dose to the target volume and reduces the risk of radiation damage to the adjacent normal structures. Nevertheless, it is still inevitable for IMRT of head and neck cancer to cause radiation-related toxic and side effects, such as dry mouth, mucositis, oral dysarthria, taste disorder, osteonecrosis, and trismus. Trismus is one of the most common late side effects caused by radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), which seriously affects the quality of life for patients with NPC. However, the current clinical assessment and management of trismus after radiotherapy for NPC are still imperfect. This best practice implementation project aimed to implement an evidence-based practice in assessing and managing trismus for NPC patients who underwent radiotherapy, thereby improving the compliance of clinical practice with the best evidence and the quality of life of patients with NPC.

METHODS

This evidence-based audit and feedback project was implemented using a three-phase approach at a third-class hospital in China, following JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and GRiP evidence application. The first phase included a baseline audit with six evidence-based audit criteria derived from the best available evidence. The second phase included analyzing the results of the baseline audit, identifying barriers to compliance with best practice principles, and developing and implementing strategies to address the barriers identified in the baseline audit. The third phase involved a follow-up audit to assess the results of the interventions implemented to improve practice.

RESULTS

After evidence application, the compliance rate for audit criterion 1 increased from 0% at baseline audit to 70% at follow-up audit. The compliance rate for audit criterion 2 increased from 0% to 100%. The compliance rate for audit criterion 3 increased from 22 to 62%. The compliance rate for audit criterion 4 increased from 88 to 100%. The compliance rate for audit criterion 5 was 100% at baseline audit and follow-up audit. The compliance rate for audit criterion 6 increased from 0 to 55%.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the best evidence for the assessment and management of trismus of patients with NPC after radiotherapy is conducive to improving the compliance of clinical practice with the best evidence, standardizing clinical nursing practice, improving the quality of clinical nursing, and better preventing severe trismus in patients with NPC after radiotherapy.

Promoting oral and dental healthcare among the elderly in a residential care home in Isfahan: a best practice implementation project

INTRODUCTION

Oral health is an important aspect of general health, which affects the wellbeing and quality of life of older adults. Residents in aged care facilities often suffer from overall dental neglect and insufficient oral healthcare, leading to moderate-to-high levels of oral diseases. Furthermore, physical or mental health concerns may result in difficulties in maintaining good oral health.

OBJECTIVES

This implementation project aims to audit and improve the oral healthcare status of the elderly living in a residential care home in Isfahan, Iran using the JBI evidence summary.

METHODS

The methods are preimplementation and postimplementation design using audit and feedback with a situational analysis to guide implementation planning. Seven evidence-based quality indicators were used to measure preintervention compliance with the best practice. Situational analysis was used to identify and target barriers through locally developed practice change strategies following which a repeat audit was conducted at 4 months. Four nursing staff, 11 caregivers, and 38 residents were interviewed for both the baseline and the follow-up audit.

RESULTS

Compliance rates improved for all seven criteria except the use of a soft-bristled toothbrush (criterion 6). All eight categories of criterion 2 measuring assessment of oral health improved by at least 10%, with the largest improvements in saliva assessment and gingiva assessment. Criterion 1 (oral health training for caregivers) reached the greatest compliance rate (100%).

CONCLUSION

The implemented strategies included improving knowledge and changing the attitudes of the caregivers through organizing educational sessions. These strategies were developed to address process and structural barriers to best practice and were helpful for staff uptake of evidence.