A prospective single-institution study of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for early-stage breast cancer

Comparing the DNA-damage RBE of intraoperative and conventional electron beams using a hybrid simulation approach

PURPOSE

Employing electron beam for radiotherapy purposes now has been established as one of the standard cancer treatment modalities. Both dedicated intraoperative and conventional electron beams can be employed in patient irradiation. Due to the differences between accelerating structure and electron beam delivery of dedicated intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) machines and conventional ones, the initial energy spectra of the produced electron beam by these machines may be different. Accordingly, this study aims to evaluate whether these spectral differences can affect the relevant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values of intraoperative and conventional electron beams.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A hybrid Monte Carlo simulation approach was considered. At first, the head LIAC12 machine (as an IORT accelerator) and Varian 2100C/D (as a conventional accelerator) were simulated by MCNPX code and electron energy spectra at different depths and off-axis distances were scored for two nominal electron energies of 6 and 12 MeV at the field sizes of 6 and 10 cm. Then, the calculated spectra were imported to MCDS code to estimate the induced DNA-damage RBE values. Finally, the obtained RBE values for intraoperative and conventional electron beams were compared together.

RESULTS

The results showed that the RBE values of the intraoperative electron beam are superior to those obtained for conventional electron beam at the same energy/field size combination. Variations of the depth can regularly affect the RBE value for both conventional and intraoperative electron beams, while no ordered variation trend was observed for RBE with changing the off-axis distance. Variations of electron energy and field size can also influence the RBE value for both types of studied electron beams.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results, it can be concluded the structural differences between the dedicated IORT and conventional Linacs can lead to distinct initial electron energy spectra for intraoperative and conventional electron beams. These physical differences can finally lead to different RBE values for intraoperative and conventional electron beams at the same energy and field size.

Real World and Public Health Perspectives of Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Analysis Beyond the Statistical Facts

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) (usually a lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (RT)) has become a standard alternative to radical mastectomy in early-stage breast cancers with equal, if not higher, survival rates. The established standard of the RT component of the BCT had been about six weeks of Monday through Friday external beam RT to the whole breast (WBRT). Recent clinical trials have shown that partial breast radiation therapy (PBRT) to the region surrounding the lumpectomy cavity with shorter courses can result in equal local control, survival, and slightly improved cosmetic outcomes. Intraoperative RT (IORT) wherein RT is administered at the time of operation for BCT to the lumpectomy cavity as a single-fraction RT is also considered PBRT. The advantage of IORT is that weeks of RT are avoided. However, the role of IORT as part of BCT has been controversial. The extreme views go from "I will not recommend to anyone" to "I can recommend to all early-stage favorable patients." These divergent views are due to difficulty in interpreting the clinical trial results. There are two modalities of delivering IORT, namely, the use of low-energy 50 kV beams or electron beams. There are several retrospective, prospective, and two randomized clinical trials comparing IORT versus WBRT. Yet, the opinions are divided. In this paper, we try to bring clarity and consensus from a highly broad-based multidisciplinary team approach. The multidisciplinary team included breast surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical physicists, biostatisticians, public health experts, nurse practitioners, and medical oncologists. We show that there is a need to more carefully interpret and differentiate the data based on electron versus low-dose X-ray modalities; the randomized study results have to be extremely carefully dissected from biostatistical points of view; the importance of the involvement of patients and families in the decision making in a very transparent and informed manner needs to be emphasized; and the compromise some women may be willing to accept between 2-4% potential increase in local recurrence (as interpreted by some of the investigators in IORT randomized studies) versus mastectomy. We conclude that, ultimately, the choice should be that of women with detailed facts of the pros and cons of all options being presented to them from the angle of patient/family-focused care. Although the guidelines of various professional societies can be helpful, they are only guidelines. The participation of women in IORT clinical trials is still needed, and as genome-based and omics-based fine-tuning of prognostic fingerprints evolve, the current guidelines need to be revisited. Finally, the use of IORT can help rural, socioeconomically, and infrastructure-deprived populations and geographic regions as the convenience of single-fraction RT and the possibility of breast preservation are likely to encourage more women to choose BCT than mastectomy. This option can also likely lead to more women choosing to get screened for breast cancer, thus enabling the diagnosis of breast cancer at an earlier stage and improving the survival outcomes.

Delivery of Adjuvant Radiation in 5 Days or Less After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Recent data have been published supporting the application of ultra-short radiation therapy (RT) regimens for women with early stage breast cancer following breast conserving surgery (BCS). What has remained controversial is whether and how to apply accelerated whole breast irradiation (AWBI) or accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) approaches in these patients, as well as the consideration of intraoperative RT (IORT) for this population.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature searching for randomized and prospective data published evaluating ultra-short RT delivered in 5-days or less with APBI, AWBI, or IORT.

RESULTS

We identified two randomized studies applying AWBI (n=5,011 patients) with 5 to 10 year follow up, which supported the use of ultra-short course AWBI (5 fractions in one week) as compared to hypofractionated WBI. We identified six randomized trials evaluating APBI (as compared to WBI) in 5 days or less (n= 8,415) with numerous (n=55) prospective studies as well, with the data supporting short course APBI as compared to WBI. Finally, we identified two randomized trials evaluating IORT; however, both trials demonstrated elevated rates of recurrence with IORT as compared to WBI.

CONCLUSIONS

The current body of data available for ultra-short adjuvant RT regimens delivered in 5-days or less after BCS overwhelming support their utilization. While data for both exists, APBI regimens have, by far, greater numbers of patients and longer follow-up as compared to AWBI. Also, given increased rates of recurrence seen with IORT with long-term follow-up, this should not be considered a standard approach at this time.

Breast conservative surgery and whole breast radiotherapy vs breast conservative surgery and IORT: surgical opinion

BACKGROUND

To define the possibility of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT)'s application on clinical practice and point out the problems observed by Verona Breast Unit.

METHODS

Among AOUI ( Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata ) Verona Breast Unit's patients, treated between July 2015 and June 2017, were identified 459 patients undergoing breast conserving surgery for a carcinoma, followed by IORT in 77 cases or by Whole Breast Radiotherapy (WBRT) in 382 cases. The data of WBRT group were analysed considering IORT' eligibility criteria to identify a sub-group of candidable patients, for whom we evaluated the diagnostic process that had lead to exclusion from IORT.

RESULTS

In WBRT group 184 patients (48%) had a ductal NOS infiltrating carcinoma, of which 64 cases (16.8%) were eligible for IORT. Other 79 patients of WBRT group (21%) presented DCIS, of which only 27 were in ASTRO (American Society for Radation Oncology) "suitable" group for IORT. Considering the results of the pre-operative exams, or rather agobiopsy and MRI scan, 55 patients of 64 (85.9%) resulted unsuitable for IORT, while 9 patients (14.1%) could be eligible.

CONCLUSIONS

IORT' major limits are: the restricted eligibility criteria, especially on histology; the need of a complete execution of preoperative exams and the tecnical limits of these exams. ASTRO suitable group, including small diameter, low-grade DCIS, might be used to extend the candidability criteria. A multidisciplinary approach might improve the pre-operative study, so the use of IORT in clinical practice.