Biosimilar infliximab use in paediatric IBD

Randomised clinical trial: First-line infliximab biosimilar is cost-effective compared to conventional treatment in paediatric Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Data on cost-effectiveness of first-line infliximab in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease are limited. Since biologics are increasingly prescribed and accompanied by high costs, this knowledge gap needs to be addressed.

AIM

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of first-line infliximab compared to conventional treatment in children with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease.

METHODS

We included patients from the Top-down Infliximab Study in Kids with Crohn's disease randomised controlled trial. Children with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease were treated with azathioprine maintenance and either five induction infliximab (biosimilar) infusions or conventional induction treatment (exclusive enteral nutrition or corticosteroids). Direct healthcare consumption and costs were obtained per patient until week 104. This included data on outpatient hospital visits, hospital admissions, drug costs, endoscopies and surgeries. The primary health outcome was the odds ratio of being in clinical remission (weighted paediatric Crohn's disease activity index<12.5) during 104 weeks.

RESULTS

We included 89 patients (44 in the first-line infliximab group and 45 in the conventional treatment group). Mean direct healthcare costs per patient were €36,784 for first-line infliximab treatment and €36,874 for conventional treatment over 2 years (p = 0.981). The odds ratio of first-line infliximab versus conventional treatment to be in clinical remission over 104 weeks was 1.56 (95%CI 1.03-2.35, p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line infliximab treatment resulted in higher odds of being in clinical remission without being more expensive, making it the dominant strategy over conventional treatment in the first 2 years after diagnosis in children with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02517684.

Clinical outcomes and cost savings of a nonmedical switch to a biosimilar in children/young adults with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

The safety, efficacy, and cost savings associated with biosimilar medications are well established. However, a lack of pediatric data exists surrounding clinical outcomes when switching from an originator to a biosimilar. Our primary aim is to evaluate clinical outcomes following a nonmedical switch from the infliximab originator to a biosimilar in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our secondary aim is to estimate cost savings associated with this switch.

METHODS

A quality improvement project was implemented to establish safe switching protocols, then those patients who underwent a nonmedical switch from the infliximab originator to the biosimilar were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, physician global assessments (PGAs), and laboratory values were recorded 1 year pre- and post-switch. Continuation rates on the biosimilar were reported at 6 and 12 months. Cost savings were estimated using two different pricing models.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients underwent a nonmedical switch. Laboratory values including inflammatory markers, infliximab levels, and PGA scores remained similar when assessed pre- and post-switch. No infusion reactions or antidrug antibody development occurred. Two patients reported psoriasis-like rashes. Five patients switched back to the originator during the study period. There were 379 biosimilar infusions completed with an estimated total cost savings of $11,260 (average sales price) and $566,223 (wholesale acquisition cost).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical remission rates, inflammatory laboratory markers, serious adverse events, infliximab levels, and antidrug antibodies remained similar after a one-time nonmedical switch to an infliximab biosimilar. Nonmedical switching to biosimilars resulted in significant cost savings.

Factors that influence infliximab biosimilar trough levels in the pediatric inflammatory bowel disease population

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar infliximab (IFX-BioS) in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate factors predicting IFX-BioS trough levels (TLs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

IBD children with an indication to start IFX-BioS were included in this prospective observational study (January 2021-June 2022). TLs were measured at the 4th and 6th infusions and correlated with several covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 110 TLs in 55 children were included. The multivariate linear regression model at the 4th infusion found a positive correlation between TLs and age at diagnosis (B:1.950, 95% CI: [0.019, 3.882], p = 0.048) and IFX-BioS dose/kg (B:1.962, 95% CI: [0.238, 3.687], p = 0.029), and a negative correlation with clinical scores (B:-0.401, 95% CI: [-0.738, -0.064], p = 0.023). At the 6th infusion, female gender (B:6.887, 95% CI: [0.861, 12.913], p = 0.029), hemoglobin (B:1.853, 95% CI: [0.501, 3.204], p = 0.011), and IFX-BioS dose/kg (B:1.792, 95% CI: [0.979, 2.605], p < 0.001) were found to be positively correlated to TLs. No association between combined clinical and biochemical remission and TLs was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study discovered some predictors for IFX-BioS TLs in IBD children. Knowledge of predictive factors could help physicians choose the best dosing regimen.

The Impact of Biologic Therapies on Rate of Colectomy in Paediatric-onset Ulcerative Colitis - A Population-Based Cohort Study

AIM

Biologic therapies have been associated with reduced rate of colectomy in ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults, but data are limited in paediatric-onset UC. Our aim was to define the rate of colectomy in paediatric-onset UC, including post-transition into adult care, and to evaluate the impact of biologic therapies on rate of colectomy.

METHOD

All prevalent patients diagnosed with paediatric-onset UC in South-East Scotland were identified from a prospectively accrued database at our regional tertiary centre. Patients exposed to biologics or surgery were identified and further data collected from health records. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate cumulative risk of colectomy over time.

RESULTS

145 prevalent patients were identified between 2000 and 2021. Median follow-up was 7.9 years (IQR 4.1-13.1). 23 patients (16 %) underwent a colectomy. 50/145 (34 %) patients received biologic therapy, and 13/23 (57 %) patients who underwent colectomy received biologics. The cumulative risk of colectomy across the whole cohort at 1, 5, and 10 years was 3 %, 13 % and 16 %, respectively. Patients exposed to biologics had a higher colectomy rate at 5 and 10 years (22 % and 34 %). Patients in the pre-biologic era (2000-2008) had non-significantly reduced time from diagnosis to colectomy (2.4 vs 3.7 years, p = 0.204).

CONCLUSION

We have defined the 1-, 5-, and 10-year colectomy rate in a population-based cohort of Paediatric-onset UC patients. Patients who received biologic therapy had a significantly increased risk of colectomy. Increased severity of disease in these patients may account for the greater colectomy risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

Similar Growth Outcomes in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Initiated on Infliximab Originator or Biosimilar

BACKGROUND

Growth is an important clinical outcome, especially in childhood-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Prior research has demonstrated growth improvements with infliximab therapy. There are limited studies evaluating whether clinical and growth outcomes in children initiated on the infliximab originator and infliximab biosimilar are similar.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of patients with IBD, younger than 17 years old, and initiated on the infliximab originator or biosimilar for at least 12 months between April 2016 and February 2021. Propensity score matching was utilized. Laboratory values, disease activity scores, and growth values were collected at baseline (prior to infliximab initiation), 6 months, and 12 months post initiation. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were used to test differences in measures over time and between study groups.

RESULTS

There were 113 patients on the originator and 39 patients on a biosimilar who met eligibility criteria. Propensity score methodology identified 37 dyads (1:1 match). Weight, height, and body mass index z scores increased over time (from baseline to 12 months) for both groups ( P < 0.05) and there was a similar rate of change between study groups. Clinical outcomes of lab values (albumin, C-reactive protein, and hemoglobin) and disease activity scoring were similar from baseline to 12 months between study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There were similar improvements in growth and clinical outcomes in patients initiated on the infliximab originator compared to an infliximab biosimilar agent. This study adds to the limited research evaluating whether infliximab biosimilars have similar growth outcomes in children with IBD.

The inexorable increase of biologic exposure in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a Scottish, population-based, longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

The use of biologics in paediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) is rapidly changing.

AIMS

To identify the incidence and prevalence of biologic use within Scottish PIBD services, and to describe patient demographics and outcomes for those patients who required escalation of therapy beyond anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) agents METHODS: We captured a nationwide cohort of prospectively identified patients less than 18 years of age with PIBD (A1 phenotype; diagnosed <17 years of age) within paediatric services over a 4.5-year period (1 January 2015-30 June 2019). All patients who received infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab or ustekinumab during the study period and/or received their first dose of these biologics were audited retrospectively.

RESULTS

Scotland-wide PIBD-prevalence cases increased from 554 to 644 over the study period. A total of 495 incident new-start biological therapies were commenced on 403 PIBD patients: 295 infliximab (60%), 161 adalimumab (32%), 24 vedolizumab (5%) and 15 ustekunumab (3%). The proportion of new-start biologics changed with infliximab initiation rates decreasing (87%-54%) while adalimumab (13%-31%), vedolizumab (0%-9%) and ustekinumab (0%-6%) all increased. The incidence rate (first dose of new biologic not including biosimilar switch) increased from 6.9% to 8.1% over the study period and point prevalence rates (any biologic use) increased from 20.2% to 43.5% - an average annual percentage increase of 20%. Biosimilar penetration of new-start anti-TNFα agents increased from 3% to 91%. Demographics and outcomes of those patients receiving vedolizumab and ustekinumab were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete accrual of Scottish nationwide biologic usage within paediatric services demonstrates a rapidly changing, inexorably increasing PIBD biologics landscape.

Real-life experience of infliximab biosimilar in pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease: data from the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

OBJECTIVE

To provide data on the use of infliximab biosimilars (IFX-BioS) in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A multicenter, observational, retrospective study was performed among the cohort of the Sicilian Network for IBD. All consecutive IBD children who had at least completed the induction with IFX-BioS from its introduction in Sicily to January 2021 were enrolled. Clinical remission at weeks 14 and 52, treatment persistence, and adverse events were the study outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients [Crohn's disease (CD): 57.5% and ulcerative colitis (UC): 42.5%] were included: 75 (86.2%) were antitumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) agent naïve, while three (3.45%) were switched from the originator to IFX-BioS. Twenty (23%) patients were multiply switched from the biosimilar CT-P13 to SB2 or GP1111 or vice versa. The median follow-up time was 15 months. Clinical remission was achieved by 55.2 and 65.5% of patients at weeks 14 and 52, respectively, with no differences between CD and UC. Dose escalation was needed in 8.0 and 35.7% of patients during induction and maintenance, respectively. Nine adverse events occurred (incidence rate: 6.13/100 person-year). Treatment persistence was 90.8% at 1 year and 75.7% at 2 years (patients on IFX-BioS at 2 years, n = 28). The risk of treatment discontinuation was higher in patients with extraintestinal manifestations ( P = 0.018) and in those who were nonnaïve to anti-TNF-α ( P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest cohort of pediatric IBD patients treated with IFX-BioS. Real-life data show that IFX-BioS is efficacious in IBD children, with high percentages of treatment persistence and a low incidence of nonserious adverse events.

Biosimilars in Pediatric IBD: Updated Considerations for Disease Management

Biologic drugs have significantly modified the pharmacological management of several chronic conditions, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). By contrast, in the last two decades, biologics have been associated with increased direct medical costs. As patents for the reference drugs have expired, the development and commercialization of biosimilars through abbreviated licensing pathways represented an affordable alternative in patients fulfilling the indication for biologics. A growing body of evidence, first in adults and then in the pediatric age group too, has provided reassuring data in terms of efficacy and safety of biosimilars both in naïve patients and in those previously on reference drugs who had to switch to the biosimilar. This review summarizes the currently available evidence for biosimilar use in IBD, with a focus on pediatric IBD. The most common practical approaches to biosimilar use in the pediatric clinical settings are also discussed.

Biosimilars in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Real Life-Based Evidence

Background: Many pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are now using biosimilars of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), with increasing trends in recent years. This study reviewed all available data regarding the use of biosimilars in children with IBD.

Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases were searched through keywords; inflammatory bowel diseases, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, biosimilar and child were combined using “AND” and “OR.” Original research articles involving pediatric patients receiving one of the biosimilar medications based on the anti-TNF-α biologic drugs approved for pediatric IBD treatment, independently from efficacy and drug response, were included.

Results: Nine studies were included in the evidence synthesis. CT-P13 was the biosimilar used in all studies. Four studies assessed the induction effectiveness of CT-P13. Clinical response and remission rates of biosimilar treatment were 86–90% and 67–68%, respectively, and they were not significantly different to the originator group. Five prospective studies on patients elected to switch from originator IFX to CT-P13 yielded similar results. Adverse events related to CT-P13 were mostly mild. The most frequently reported were upper respiratory tract infections. The switch from the originator had no significant impact on immunogenicity.

Conclusion: The current review showed reported CT-P13 effectiveness as measured by clinical response and/or remission rates after induction or during maintenance and suggest that there is no significant difference with that of the originator IFX. Further studies are warranted, including clinical, and pharmacovigilance studies.

Increasing Biosimilar Utilization at a Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center and Associated Cost Savings: Show Me the Money

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (anti-TNFs) are a primary treatment for inflammatory bowel disease. Pharmaceutical expenditures and usage of specialty drugs are increasing. In the United States, biosimilars continue to be underutilized, despite opportunities for health care cost savings. Through quality improvement (QI) methodology, we aimed to increase biosimilar utilization among eligible patients initiating intravenous (IV) anti-TNF therapy and describe patient outcomes and associated cost savings.

METHODS

Beginning in July 2019, all patients initiating IV anti-TNF therapy were identified and tracked. Using the Institute of Healthcare Improvement Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, a four-stage problem-solving model used for carrying out change, we trialed interventions to increase biosimilar utilization, including provider, staff, and family education, and utilization of a clinical pharmacist and insurance specialist. Statistical process control charts were used to show improvement over time. Patients' clinical outcome and cost savings were reviewed.

RESULTS

Using QI methodology, we increased biosimilar utilization from a baseline of 1% in June 2019 to 96% by February 2021, with sustained improvement. The originator (infliximab) was the insurance company's preferred product for 20 patients (20%). Patient outcomes (IV anti-TNF levels, absence of antidrug antibodies, and physician global assessment) between biosimilars and originators were similar. Estimated cost savings over the project duration were nearly $381,000 (average sales price) and $651,000 (wholesale acquisition cost).

CONCLUSIONS

Through QI methodology, we increased biosimilar utilization from 1% to 96% with sustained improvement, without compromising patient outcomes or safety. Estimated cost savings were substantial. Similar methodology could be implemented at other institutions to increase biosimilar utilization and potentially decrease health care costs.

Real-Life Use of Biosimilars in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nation-Wide Web Survey on Behalf of the SIGENP IBD Working Group

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the awareness and real-life use of biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among the members of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (SIGENP).

METHODS

An anonymous web survey involving all SIGENP IBD units which can prescribe biosimilars was conducted between July 1st and December 1st, 2020. The questionnaire included 18 questions addressing the most relevant aspects of biosimilars in pediatric IBD, i.e., advantages, disadvantages, costs, traceability, general knowledge, and real-life use. A descriptive analysis of responses was performed.

RESULTS

Responses came from 26 pediatric IBD units in Italy, with representation of the North, the Center, and the South of Italy. The majority of participants (n = 20) had spent > 10 years caring for pediatric IBD patients, and worked in a center which had between 100 and 500 registered pediatric IBD patients (n = 14). Most participants (n = 18) reported they were aware that biosimilars have similar efficacy and safety to those of the originator, and all regarded cost-sparing as the main advantage of biosimilars. Most respondents (n = 20) reported they switch from originator to biosimilar in their everyday clinical practice, mostly during the maintenance phase. Most respondents (n = 20) registered no acute adverse events. Nearly all participants felt totally or very confident in using biosimilars.

CONCLUSIONS

A few years after the introduction of the first biosimilar into the market, real-life data coming from the major IBD units in Italy confirm a favorable and confident position on the use of biosimilars in pediatric IBD.

Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept Biosimilars Compared With the Originator for Treatment of Juvenile Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of etanercept biosimilars in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in comparison with the etanercept originator in terms of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with JIA who started treatment with either the etanercept originator or a biosimilar after January 1, 2017, were selected from the German BIKER registry (Biologics in Paediatric Rheumatology Registry). Furthermore, patients who started therapy with the originator and switched to a biosimilar during the course of therapy were identified. For both patient groups, disease activity and safety were examined and compared separately.

RESULTS

After January 1, 2017, 348 patients started treatment with the etanercept originator (n = 293) or a biosimilar (n = 55). Another 57 patients switched to a biosimilar during the course of therapy. A significant decrease or a stable remission of disease activity was observed in both patient groups. The safety profiles were comparable, and frequencies and types of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were similar in patients starting therapy with the originator or a biosimilar. Only injection site reactions occurred slightly more frequently under biosimilar therapy, without having an impact on therapy adherence. In patients who switched therapy, the AE rate per 100 patient-years was comparable before (26.4) and after (32.1) the switch.

CONCLUSION

In patients with JIA who require treatment with etanercept, the originator is still used much more frequently. However, our study highlights the equivalence of etanercept biosimilars for therapy for JIA. Increased use of these biosimilars in pediatric patients can therefore be recommended without hesitation.

Biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease

The advent of biologics has changed outcomes in many chronic conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Biologics have been used for the induction and remission of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease for almost two decades and are effective in patients who used to fail conventional treatment with steroids, immunomodulators. The use of biologics in the treatment of IBD has increased over the last few years, partly due to the rise in its incidence and the use of biologics as a first-line treatment in severe disease as well as in complicated diseases like penetrating/fistulating Crohn's disease. However, their use is associated with a significant burden to the society with respect to healthcare costs, resulting in the premature discontinuation of therapy in some patients, leading to exacerbations and complications. The introduction of biosimilars a decade ago seems to be a promising approach to reducing the costs related to therapy. Since their introduction, numerous studies conducted in adults and some in children show the efficacy of biosimilars with a similar side-effect profile to biologics. This review discusses the history of biosimilars in the treatment of IBD, enumerates several such studies and discusses the possibility of using biosimilars in the future.

Biological therapy in pediatric age

Biological therapies, especially blocking tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) agents have radically changed the therapeutic approach and disease course of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In particular, drugs such as infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) have been demonstrated to be effective in inducing and maintaining corticosteroid-free remission in both adult and pediatric patients with Crohns Disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC). Biosimilar biological (BioS) therapy is increasingly being used in pediatric age even though most knowledge on the safety and efficacy of these agents is based on IFX in adult IBD data. Studies show high rates of clinical response and remission in both IFX naïve patients and in patients switched from originator to BioS with similar risks of adverse events (AEs) as those reported with IFX originator. In the present review indications, efficacy and AEs of biological therapy in pediatric IBD will be discussed, as well as the role of other biological agents such as Golimumab, Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab, the role of BioS biological therapy and utility of therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice.

Biosimilar infliximab in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease: Efficacy, immunogenicity and safety

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Based on extrapolation, biosimilar infliximab (IFX) was approved to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The first studies in adults have shown similar efficacy and safety in comparison with reference drug. The aim of this review was to collect and evaluate all the literature data regarding the use of biosimilar IFX in paediatric IBD.

METHODS

This article reviewed efficacy, immunogenicity and safety profile of biosimilar IFX in IBD paediatric patients through a comprehensive search of the published literature.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Eight papers were extracted and critically reviewed. Four paediatric studies (prospective, n = 3; retrospective, n = 1) assessed the induction efficacy of the biosimilar IFX. Clinical response and remission rates reported were 86%-90% and 67%-68%, respectively. No significant difference in clinical response and remission rates between the reference and biosimilar IFX groups was found at follow-up (range: 3-13 months). Similar findings were shown in the prospective studies (n = 4) conducted on patients elected to switch from reference IFX to its biosimilar. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) of biosimilar IFX were mild upper respiratory tract infections. Taking into account of all AEs coming from published data, biosimilar IFX seems to be as safe as its originator. Immunogenicity has not been significantly impacted by the switch from the reference drug.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

To date, treatment with (or switch to) biosimilar IFX in paediatric patients with IBD have been successful, without affecting efficacy, immunogenicity or safety. However, further studies are warranted, including clinical trials and pharmacovigilance studies.

Infliximab and its biosimilar produced similar first-year therapy outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

Tumour necrosis factor α inhibitors (anti-TNFα) are the main therapy for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in children. Biosimilars to the original drug infliximab are now available, but there are few reports on their real-life use. We compared the outcomes of patients treated with infliximab and its biosimilar, CT-P13.

METHODS

We collected outcome data on anti-TNFα-naive patients who started infliximab in the Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Finland, in 2015-2016. We studied 51 paediatric patients with IBD at a median age of 12 (range 4-16): 65% had Crohn disease, 23 received the original infliximab drug and 28 received the biosimilar. During 2015, infliximab was introduced to all treatment-naïve patients, and during 2016, all treatment-naïve patients received the biosimilar.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences between the two drug products related to the outcome of the therapy during the first year. There were no significant differences in the trough levels between the treatment groups. Likewise, the proportion of patients with therapy enhancement was comparable between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The first-year therapy outcomes of infliximab and its biosimilar were comparable. There were no alarming signs of differences in safety.

CT-P13: a review on a biosimilar to infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Introduction: CT-P13 was developed as an infliximab biosimilar in 2013. The primary structure of CT-P13 is identical to that of original infliximab and it has highly similar higher order structure, physiochemical characteristics, and biological properties. To date, data from real-life cohorts and randomized controlled trials show comparable clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of biosimilar CT-P13, and the original reference medicinal Product (RMP). Areas covered: This article reviews the comparability of CT-P13 and the RMP and focuses on the emerging clinical trial and observational cohorts data on efficacy and safety of CT-P13 in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The development of a subcutaneous formulation of Infliximab CT-P13 is also addressed. Expert opinion: There is a plethora of evidence to show CT-P13 is non-inferior to infliximab RMP in IBD and that a switch from RMP to this biosimilar is feasible and safe. However, interchangeability and multiple switches can still not be endorsed for introduction into clinical practice.

A Review on the Use of Anti-TNF in Children and Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) presents with disabling symptoms and may lead to insufficient growth and late pubertal development in cases of disease onset during childhood or adolescence. During the last decade, the role of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in the treatment of paediatric-onset IBD has gained more ground. The number of biologicals presently available for children and adolescents with IBD has increased, biosimilars have become available, and practices in adult gastroenterology with regards to anti-TNF have changed. The aim of this study is to review the current evidence on the indications, judicious use, effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF agents in paediatric IBD. A PubMed literature search was performed and included articles published after 2000 using the following terms: child or paediatric, Crohn, ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, anti-TNF, TNF alpha inhibitor, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab and biological. Anti-TNF agents, specifically infliximab and adalimumab, have proven to be effective in moderate and severe paediatric IBD. Therapeutic drug monitoring increases therapy effectiveness and safety. Clinical predictors for anti-TNF response are currently of limited value because of the variation in outcome definitions and follow-ups. Future research should comprise large cohorts and clinical trials comparing groups according to their risk profile in order to provide personalized therapeutic strategies.

Switching from infliximab to biosimilar in inflammatory bowel disease: overview of the literature and perspective

BACKGROUND

Biological therapy has revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). After the expiration of patents for biological innovator products, development of biosimilars increased. CT-P13 was the first biosimilar approved for the same indications as the reference product; however, the approval was based on extrapolated data from rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Our aim was to review clinical studies about switching from originator infliximab (IFX-O) to biosimilar infliximab (IXF-B) in IBD, focusing on recently published data and the future of biosimilars.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for original articles published up to 1 December 2018 reporting data on IFX-B in IBD.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies assessing switching from IFX-O to IFX-B, 14 assessing induction therapy with IFX-B were found. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were discussed. Studies confirm that CT-P13 is safe and equally efficient as the reference product for both induction and maintenance therapy; and that switching from the reference product to biosimilar is non-inferior to continuous biosimilar use. However, efficacy and safety data on Flixabi (SB2) in IBD patients is lacking.

CONCLUSION

Switching from the originator to a biosimilar in patients with IBD is acceptable, although scientific and clinical evidence is lacking regarding reverse switching, multiple switching and cross-switching among biosimilars in IBD patients.

Utility of proactive infliximab levels in paediatric Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

Infliximab (IFX) has an established role in Crohn's disease (CD), with serum trough levels of IFX (TLI) increasingly used to optimise dosing. We report the utility of routine, proactive TLI in children on combination therapy with immunosuppression (IS) from a single paediatric centre.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of all children with CD receiving IFX therapy conducted betweenJanuary 2014-May 2017. Clinical phenotype, duration of therapy, TLI (µg/mL), drug antibodies, type of IS, biomarkers and changes in management were recorded.

RESULTS

60 children (8-17 years; median 14.1 years) had 206 TLIs recorded. 56/60 (93%) were on IS, with 5/60 (8%) developing antidrug antibodies (ADAs). 63/206 TLIs were recorded duringan episode of relapse (median 3.0 µg/mL) vs 143/206 TLIs recorded in remission (median 5.2 µg/mL). For children with TLI <3 µg/mL, 31/63 (49%) were in relapse vs 30/143 (21%) in remission. For children with TLI >7 µg/mL, 7/63 (11%) were in relapse vs 46/143 (32%) in remission. Change in management resulted from 43/206 (21%) TLIs in 31/60 (52%) children: 21 dose escalations, 12 de-escalations and 10 changed to adalimumab. Of 31 postinduction TLIs, 15/17 (88%) children with TLI >7 µg/mL achieved clinical and biochemical remission for the duration of therapy (median 14 months), while 4/5 (80%) children with TLI <3 µg/mL required early dose escalation. Combination therapy with thiopurines (TP) (median TLI 4.9 µg/mL) versus methotrexate (MTX) (median TLI 5.2 µg/mL) achieved comparable levels with no difference in relapse frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine, proactive TLIs guide optimal management in children with CD. Postinduction and during maintenance, levels <3 µg/mL were associated with relapse and levels >7 µg/mL with sustained remission. Combination IS with TP and MTX appears to offer comparable TLI and ADA rates.

The PROSIT Cohort of Infliximab Biosimilar in IBD: A Prolonged Follow-up on the Effectiveness and Safety Across Italy

BACKGROUND

We report a prospective, nationwide cohort evaluating the safety and effectiveness of CT-P13.

METHODS

A structured database was used to record serious adverse events (SAEs), clinical remission/response, inflammatory biomarkers (CRP and calprotectin), and endoscopic findings.

RESULTS

Eight hundred ten patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (452 Crohn's disease [CD]) were enrolled. Four hundred fifty-nine patients were naïve to anti-TNFα (group A), 196 had a previous exposure (group B), and the remaining 155 were switched to CT-P13 (group C). All patients were included in the safety evaluation with a mean follow-up of 345 ± 215 days and a total number of 6501 infusions. One hundred fifty-four SAEs were reported (19%), leading to cessation of the biosimilar in 103 subjects (12.7%). Infusion reactions were 71, leading to cessation of the biosimilar in 53 subjects (6.5%), being significantly more frequent in patients pre-exposed to anti-TNFα (P = 0.017). The efficacy of therapy was calculated in 754 IBD patients, with a mean follow-up of 329 ± 202 days. Forty-eight patients had a primary failure (6.4%), and 188 (25.6%) lost response during follow-up. Six hundred twenty-eight (364 CD) and 360 IBD patients (222 CD) completed the follow-up at 6 and 12 months, respectively. At 12 months, patients without loss of response were 71%, 64%. and 82% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (log rank P = 0.01). Clinical/endoscopic scores and inflammatory biomarkers dropped significantly in CD and UC patients (P = 0.01 and P < 0.0001) compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large prospective cohort, no further signals of difference in safety and effectiveness of CT-P13 in IBD has been observed.

Use of Biosimilars in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Updated Position Statement of the Pediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN

Biologic therapies have changed the outcome of both adult and pediatric patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). In September 2013, the first biosimilar of infliximab was introduced into the pharmaceutical market. In 2015, a first position paper on the use of biosimilars in pediatric IBD was published by the ESPGHAN IBD Porto group. Since then, more data have accumulated for both adults and children demonstrating biosimilars are an effective and safe alternative to the originator. In this updated position statement, we summarize current evidence and provide joint consensus statements regarding the recommended practice of biosimilar use in children with IBD.

Switching From Originator to Biosimilar Infliximab in Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Feasible and Uneventful

The safety, clinical efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of biosimilar infliximab in adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have now been extensively shown. Limited data have been collected in the paediatric setting. We report nationwide, prospective, clinical safety and effectiveness data for patients from all 3 Scottish paediatric inflammatory bowel disease networks switching from originator to biosimilar infliximab. Prospective clinical data were collected for 33 patients. Information was collected from electronic patient records, laboratory reports, and patient case notes. There were no clinically significant changes to disease activity, biomarkers, antidrug antibodies, or trough drug levels (P > 0.1) within a 12-month follow-up period; in addition, there were no significant adverse events reported. No infusion reactions were seen in the 264 infusions delivered. Switching from originator infliximab to the biosimilar (CT-P13) appears to be associated with neither an increase in infusion reactions nor significant loss of effectiveness in the short term.

Use of Infliximab Biosimilar Versus Originator in a Pediatric United Kingdom Inflammatory Bowel Disease Induction Cohort

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to summarize short-term effectiveness, safety, and cost of using infliximab biosimilar (IFX-B) drugs, (Inflectra [Hospira] and Remsima [NAAP]) compared to originator infliximab (IFX-O) (Remicade [MSD]) in biologic naive pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Prospective audit of patients starting anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Disease severity, response to treatment, and remission rate was measured by Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) and/or Physician Global Assessment.

RESULTS

Between March 2015 and February 2016, 278 patients (175 IFX-O, 82 IFX-B, and 21 Adalimumab) were started on anti-TNF therapy. This was compared with collected data on 398 patients started on IFX-O from 2011 to 2015. At initiation, median PCDAI was 36 (20,48) (n = 42) in the IFX-O group and 28 (20,40) (n = 29) in the IFX-B group, (P = 0.08). Immunosuppression rates were similar: 150/175 (86%) for IFX-O and 65/82 (79%) for IFX-B (P > 0.05). Post induction, median PCDAI score was 5 (0,11) (n = 19) and 0 (0,8) (n = 15) in the IFX-O and IFX-B groups, respectively (P = 0.35). There was no difference in response to treatment using Physician Global Assessment 85% (n = 28) in IFX-O group and 86% (n = 19) in IFX-B group (P > 0.05). Adverse events at initiation and post induction were not different between both groups (P > 0.05). Using conservative calculations, £875,000 would have been saved for a 1-year period with universal adoption of biosimilars in patients who were instead treated with IFX-O.

CONCLUSIONS

IFX-B is likely as effective as IFX-O in treating IBD in comparable pediatric populations. Sites should adopt infliximab biosimilar for new starts due to cost reduction with no difference in other parameters.

Biosimilars in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease

The introduction of biological treatments has changed disease outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Biologicals have high efficacy, and can induce and maintain remission after failed responses to conventional immunosuppressive and/or steroid therapy. The increasing occurrence of severe disease at diagnosis has resulted in infliximab being more often introduced as the first-line treatment in a “top-down” approach. Besides their favourable efficacy and safety profile, biologicals have one significant disadvantage, which is their high cost. This results in many patients stopping therapy prematurely, with the maintenance phase being too short. This often leads to disease exacerbation shortly after treatment cessation. Every newly started course of biological therapy can induce production of anti-drug antibodies, which can result in treatment failure and possible allergic/anaphylactic reactions. The introduction of biological biosimilars was intended to greatly reduce therapy costs thus increasing the availability of these agents to more patients. It was also anticipated that biosimilars would prevent premature termination of therapy. Analyses of paediatric data suggest that biosimilar infliximabs are equally effective as the reference infliximab. Safety patterns also seem to be similar. Paediatric experience places cost-therapy reductions at around 10%-30%.