Outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy

Surgical Outcomes of Cervical Esophageal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Cervical esophageal cancer is a rare malignancy that requires specialized care. While definitive chemoradiation is the standard treatment approach, surgery remains a valuable option for certain patients. This study examined the surgical outcomes of patients with cervical esophageal cancer.

Methods

The study involved a retrospective review and analysis of 24 patients with cervical esophageal cancer. These patients underwent surgical resection between September 1994 and December 2018.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 61.0±10.2 years, and 22 (91.7%) of them were male. Furthermore, 21 patients (87.5%) had T3 or T4 tumors, and 11 (45.8%) exhibited lymph node metastasis. Gastric pull-up with esophagectomy was performed for 19 patients (79.2%), while 5 (20.8%) underwent free jejunal graft with cervical esophagectomy. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 8.3%. During the follow-up period, complications included leakage at the anastomotic site in 9 cases (37.5%) and graft necrosis of the gastric conduit in 1 case. Progression to oral feeding was achieved in 20 patients (83.3%). Fifteen patients (62.5%) displayed tumor recurrence. The median time from surgery to recurrence was 10.5 months, and the 1-year recurrence rate was 73.3%. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 75% and 33.3%, respectively, with a median survival period of 17 months.

Conclusion

Patients with cervical esophageal cancer who underwent surgical resection faced unfavorable outcomes and relatively poor survival. The selection of cases and decision to proceed with surgery should be made cautiously, considering the risk of severe complications.

Influence of age as a continuous variable on survival outcomes and treatment options in patients with upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma

Background: This retrospective review of patients with upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) analyzed the prognostic value of age, as a continuous variable, and offered insight into treatment options. Methods: 568 upper ESCC patients underwent radical therapy between 2004 and 2016. Age as a continuous variable was entered into the Cox regression model with penalized spline (P-spline) analysis to investigate a correlation between age and survival outcomes. Results: Before adjustment, P-spline regression revealed U-shaped survival curves. Sixty years was the optimal cut-off age for differences in overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). The cohort was divided into age groups ≤ 50, 51-69, and ≥ 70 years. Multivariate analyses showed no significant differences in either PFS or OS for patients aged ≤ 50 and 51-69 years. After adjusting for covariates, P-spline regression showed that the risk of mortality and disease progression increased with age, and ≥ 70 years was an unfavorable independent prognostic factor. For age ≥ 70 years, the OS and PFS associated with non-surgery was comparable to that of surgery. For patients younger, the OS and PFS of patients given surgery was significantly better than that of patients given non-surgery. Conclusion: Age was an independent prognostic factor for upper ESCC. Patients ≥ 70 years achieved no significant survival benefit from surgery, but for those younger than 70 years surgery was the preferred treatment option.

The usefulness of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score for predicting recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: A real-world study

Background

The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, as an immune-nutritional index, has been reported to be related to prognosis in several cancers. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) is an emerging pattern for cancer treatment in recent years. However, the usefulness of CONUT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with nICT has not been reported so far. This study attempted to clarify the usefulness of CONUT in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in ESCC with nICT.

Methods

Two hundred sixteen ESCC patients receiving nICT between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Based on CONUT, the patients were divided into two groups: low groups (score ≤ 2) and high (score ≥ 3) groups. The relationships between CONUT and clinical characteristics were estimated. Cox regression analyses with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also performed to evaluate the prognostic factors of DFS.

Results

Fifty-nine (27.3%) patients achieved pathologic complete response (pCR), and 30 (13.9%) cases had a recurrence. There were 150 cases (69.4%) in low CONUT group and 66 cases (30.6%) in high CONUT group, respectively. The results revealed that vessel invasion (P = 0.037), postoperative pneumonia (P = 0.001), advanced ypT stage (P = 0.011), cTNM stage (P = 0.007), and ypTNM stage (P < 0.001) were significantly related to patients with a high CONUT score. A high pCR rate was found in patients with a low CONUT score (33.3% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.003), and a high recurrence rate was found in patients with a high CONUT score (24.2% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.004), respectively. Patients with a low CONUT score had a better 1-year DFS than those with a high CONUT score (90.7% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.004). Multivariate analyses indicated that the pretreatment CONUT score was an independent predictor regarding DFS (HR = 2.221, 95% CI: 1.067-4.625, P = 0.033).

Conclusion

A better response and a lower recurrence were found in ESCC patients with a lower pretreatment CONUT. As a useful index for immune-nutritional status, the CONUT might be a reliable prognostic indicator in ESCC patients with nICT.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in Japanese patients with cervical esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) carries a poor prognosis; however, due to its low incidence, optimal treatment for CEC remains to be established. The purpose of this study was to clarify the current status of treatment of CEC in Japan and obtain evidence for establishing the appropriate treatment method.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We asked specialist training facilities accredited by the Japanese Broncho-Esophageal Society to register data on CEC cases that received curative treatment from January 2009 to December 2014, and conducted a retrospective review of the clinical data of 302 cases registered from 27 facilities.

RESULTS

In regard to the initial therapy, of the 302 patients, 33 had undergone endoscopic resection, 41 had undergone surgery, 67 had received induction chemotherapy (IC), and 143 had received chemoradiotherapy (CRT). There were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival rates among the patient groups that had received surgery, IC or CRT as the initial treatment; advanced stage and recurrent nerve invasion were identified as independent poor prognostic factors. Among the patients who had received IC or CRT as laryngeal-preserving surgery was not indicated at the time of the initial diagnosis, the functional laryngeal preservation rate at the end of the observation period was 34.8%.

CONCLUSION

Even in patients with advanced CEC, there is the possibility of preserving the larynx by adopting IC or CRT. However, if the laryngeal function cannot be preserved, there is a risk of complications from aspiration pneumonia, so that the choice of treatment should be made carefully.

The Application of Nimotuzumab Combined With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Toward the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of nimotuzumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted from September 2012 to February 2017 among 50 locoregional-advanced cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC) patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with or without nimotuzumab at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was administrated on all patients. All patients were divided into two groups, of which 26 (Group A) received 200 mg (22 of 50) or 400 mg (4 of 50) of nimotuzumab per week with CRT and 24 (Group B) received definitive CRT.

Results

The median follow-up time was 23 months. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 40.6 and 21.1 months for all, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates on the whole were 79.6%, 62.1%, and 47.8%. There was no statistical difference in overall response rate and disease control rate between the two groups. Patients treated with nimotuzumab (group A) had better PFS than the definitive CRT group (group B) (P < 0.05). However, the median OS was 41.4 months in group A and 32.4 months in group B, respectively (P = 0.517). Multivariate analysis showed that PFS among those with lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (HR = 5.11; P < 0.01), stage II (HR = 9.52; P < 0.01) and the application of nimotuzumab combined with CRT (HR = 0.16; P < 0.01) was much longer. Furthermore, ECOG, stage, C-reactive protein (CRP) baseline, and histological grade can also be used as independent predictors of OS. Grade >3 adverse reactions were not observed. The most common adverse event related to nimotuzumab was mild fever and the occurrence rate was 19% (5 of 26). The incidence of anemia was 65.4% in group A and 87.5% in group B (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

For locoregional-advanced CEC, nimotuzumab combined with IMRT and concomitant chemotherapy was tolerated and effective. In addition, patients with a normal pretherapeutic serum CRP level (CRP < 10 mg/L) can achieve better OS.

Surgical outcomes of oro-intestinal continuity reconstruction after total esophagectomy in patients with cervicothoracic malignancy: a thoracic surgeon's perspective

Background

Oro-intestinal continuity reconstruction following total esophagectomy in patients with head-neck or esophageal cancer is rare and results in high operative morbidity and mortality. This case series aimed to investigate the perioperative surgical outcomes of oro-intestinal continuity reconstruction after total esophagectomy in selected patients with advanced head/neck or esophageal cancer.

Methods

From 2011 to 2018, 14 patients who underwent oro-intestinal reconstruction after total esophagectomy were assessed. We analyzed perioperative mortality, postoperative complications, oncologic outcomes, and recovery of dietary function.

Results

The median age of the patients was 61 (range, 42–72) years old and median follow-up time was 18.6 (range, 0–52.9) months. For conduit selection, 11 cases of oro-gastrostomy (78.6%), 2 of oro-colo-gastrostomy (14.3%), and 1 of oro-jejuno-gastrostomy (7.1%) were performed. Complete resection was pathologically confirmed in 10 patients (71.4%). Anastomosis site leakage was observed in three patients (21.4%) and conduit necrosis in two (14.3%). Postoperative mortality within 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year was 7.1%, 28.6%, and 42.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

Oro-intestinal continuity reconstruction following total esophagectomy showed acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients with advanced head/neck cancer or esophageal cancer. Careful selection of surgical candidates and multidisciplinary collaboration of experienced surgical teams are essential to minimize the surgical risk.

Efficacy and Prognostic Analysis of 315 Stage I-IVa Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Use of simulated integrated boost-intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) is rarely reported in the treatment of esophageal cancer. This study was performed to observe the curative effect and prognostic factors associated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer using modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques.

Patients and Methods

In total, 315 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received SIB-IMRT between 2015 and 2018 were included in this retrospective study. Median doses were planning target volume (PTV) 5400 cGy, 30 times (180cGy/fraction); planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) 6000 cGy, 30 times (200 cGy/fraction), once a day and 5 times a week. The entire period of RT was 6 weeks. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse reactions were observed. Univariate analysis was performed, and factors with P<0.15 were included in multivariate analysis. Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The incidence of adverse reactions under single chemotherapy concurrent chemoradiotherapy (sCCRT) and double chemotherapy concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) was analyzed.

Results

Two-year, 3-year OS and PFS of the entire group were 49.5%, 40.2% and 40.3%, 34.0%, and the median survival time was 23.5 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that T-stage (P=0.049), N-stage (P=0.024), clinical stage (P=0.041), short-term efficacy (P<0.001), and use of concurrent chemotherapy (P<0.001) were the influencing factors for OS. ORR was 87.6%. Adverse reactions were significantly increased with increasing chemotherapy dose.

Conclusion

The adverse reactions of SIB-IMRT in esophageal cancer can be tolerated. T-stage, N-stage, clinical stage, short-term curative effect, and concurrent chemotherapy are the prognostic factors affecting survival. Because it has lower toxicity and is as effective as dCCRT, sCCRT should be considered in the management of esophageal cancer.

Prognostic Significance of Interim Response Evaluation during Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of interim response evaluation during definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in predicting overall treatment response and survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC). We reviewed 194 consecutive patients treated with dCRT for biopsy-confirmed LAESCC. A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria. Interim response was assessed by defining a region of interest in initial and adaptive computed tomography (CT) images and subsequently examined against the overall treatment response assessed three months after dCRT, treatment failure pattern, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) estimates. Reductions in both the area and maximal diameter of the primary lesion (p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively) and those of the metastatic lymph nodes (LN) (p = 0.002; p < 0.001, respectively) in interim analysis were significantly higher among patients who achieved complete response (CR) than among those who did not. OS was significantly longer among patients who showed ≥30% interim reduction in the area and maximal diameter of the primary lesion and among those who showed such reduction in both the primary lesion and LN. PFS was significantly longer in the patients with ≥30% interim reduction in the area of the primary lesion. In addition, the proportion of cases with locoregional failure began decreasing at interim response of 20% or higher, while the proportion of cases with outfield failure followed the opposite pattern, increasing at interim response of 20% or higher. Among patients treated with dCRT for LAESCC, interim response assessed using adaptive CT images correlated with overall CR and OS rates. The evaluation of tumor burden reduction during dCRT may help predict patient prognosis.

Clinical results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 250 patients with cervical and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma

Purpose

To evaluate and analyze the efficacy and prognostic factors of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in 250 patients with cervical and upper esophageal carcinoma.

Patients and methods

From September 2009 to September 2016, we retrospectively analyzed 250 patients with cervical and upper esophageal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). In our study, all patients received IMRT, 54 patients with cervical esophageal carcinoma and 196 patients with upper esophageal carcinoma. Treatment response, survival status and failure modes of treatment were observed, and prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results

The median survival time was 22.60 months and 3-year survival rate was 42%. The median progress-free survival time was 14.52 months and 3-year progress-free survival rate was 29.3%. The median survival time and the median progress-free survival time for cervical esophageal carcinoma were 20.40 and 15.15 months, respectively. The median survival time and the median progress-free survival time for upper esophageal carcinoma were 25.80 and 14.52 months, respectively (P>0.05). The significant clinical factors associated with survival were patient age, radiotherapy dose and T stages (P<0.05). Radiotherapy dose and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were the significant clinical factors related to progression-free survival (P<0.05). Recurrence appeared in 55.2% patients, including local recurrence in 22.40%, region relapse in 10.40% and distant metastasis in 12.40%. Local recurrence was the main mode of treatment failure. During treatment, the main treatment-related acute toxicity was leukocytopenia and anemia.

Conclusion

In this study, IMRT demonstrated clinical benefit and well-tolerated toxicity in patients with cervical and upper esophageal carcinoma.