Myosteatosis Differentially Affects the Prognosis of Non-Metastatic Colon and Rectal Cancer Patients: An Exploratory Study

Prognostic Value of Myosteatosis and Creatinine-to-Cystatin C Ratio in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Who Underwent Radical Surgery

BACKGROUND

Myosteatosis is correlated with poor prognosis in some malignancies. The creatinine-to-cystatin ratio (CCR) is revealed to predict gastric cancer prognosis. However, the prognostic abilities of CCR and the combination of CCR and myosteatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) who underwent radical surgery remains unclear.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study included 215 patients with PC who underwent radical surgery (January 2016-October 2021). Clinicopathological and serological data were collected on admission. Myosteatosis and other body composition indices were assessed by using computed tomography. The cutoff value of CCR was determined by using the Youden index. Risk factors responsible for poor overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were determined by the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The myosteatosis group included 104 patients (average age, 61.3 ± 9.1 years). The best cutoff value for CCR was 1.09. CCR ≤ 1.09 was an independent predictive biomarker inversely corelated with OS (P = 0.036). Myosteatosis was an independent risk factor associated with OS and DFS (P = 0.032 and P = 0.004, respectively). Patients with concomitant myosteatosis and CCR ≤ 1.09 had the worst OS (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Myosteatosis and CCR are prognostic biomarkers for survival in PC patients who underwent radical surgery. Patients with the coexistence of myosteatosis and CCR ≤ 1.09 deserve more attention.

Prognostic value of myosteatosis in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The prognostic value of myosteatosis has been widely investigated in lung cancer, yet conclusions remain controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to illuminate this issue. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection online databases were systematically searched from inception to 24 September 2021. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool was applied to evaluate the quality of included studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used to examine prognostic value of myosteatosis. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess heterogeneity and stability of results. A total of 484 articles were screened from which 9 eligible studies involving 1667 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Lung cancer patients with myosteatosis had significantly worse OS than patients without myosteatosis (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.16, P < 0.001), both in six multivariate analysis (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.16-1.85, P = 0.001) and in three univariate analysis (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14, P = 0.003). Pooled data from five studies using multivariate survival analysis also showed that patients with myosteatosis had a statistically significant unfavorable PFS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.00-1.62, P = 0.049). Sensitivity analysis showed the result for OS was stable. But for PFS, the result was not robust. Myosteatosis might serve as an independent indicator of unfavorable survival outcomes for OS and PFS in lung cancer patients. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.