1
|
Bonacina G, Carollo A, Esposito G. The Genetic Side of the Mood: A Scientometric Review of the Genetic Basis of Mood Disorders. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:genes14020352. [PMID: 36833279 PMCID: PMC9956267 DOI: 10.3390/genes14020352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Mood disorders are highly heritable psychiatric disorders. Over the years, many genetic polymorphisms have been identified to pose a higher risk for the development of mood disorders. To overview the literature on the genetics of mood disorders, a scientometric analysis was performed on a sample of 5342 documents downloaded from Scopus. The most active countries and the most impactful documents in the field were identified. Furthermore, a total of 13 main thematic clusters emerged in the literature. From the qualitative inspection of clusters, it emerged that the research interest moved from a monogenic to a polygenic risk framework. Researchers have moved from the study of single genes in the early 1990s to conducting genome-wide association studies around 2015. In this way, genetic overlaps between mood disorders and other psychiatric conditions emerged too. Furthermore, around the 2010s, the interaction between genes and environmental factors emerged as pivotal in understanding the risk for mood disorders. The inspection of thematic clusters provides a valuable insight into the past and recent trends of research in the genetics of mood disorders and sheds light onto future lines of research.
Collapse
|
2
|
Chakrabarti S. Bipolar disorder in the International Classification of Diseases-Eleventh version: A review of the changes, their basis, and usefulness. World J Psychiatry 2022; 12:1335-1355. [PMID: 36579354 PMCID: PMC9791613 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i12.1335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization’s 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) including the chapter on mental disorders has come into effect this year. This review focuses on the “Bipolar or Related Disorders” section of the ICD-11 draft. It describes the benchmarks for the new version, particularly the foremost principle of clinical utility. The alterations made to the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) are evaluated on their scientific basis and clinical utility. The change in the diagnostic requirements for manic and hypomanic episodes has been much debated. Whether the current criteria have achieved an optimum balance between sensitivity and specificity is still not clear. The ICD-11 definition of depressive episodes is substantially different, but the lack of empirical support for the changes has meant that the reliability and utility of bipolar depression are relatively low. Unlike the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5), the ICD-11 has retained the category of mixed episodes. Although the concept of mixed episodes in the ICD-11 is not perfect, it appears to be more inclusive than the DSM-5 approach. Additionally, there are some uncertainties about the guidelines for the subtypes of BD and cyclothymic disorder. The initial results on the reliability and clinical utility of BD are promising, but the newly created diagnostic categories also appear to have some limitations. Although further improvement and research are needed, the focus should now be on facing the challenges of implementation, dissemination, and education and training in the use of these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subho Chakrabarti
- Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, UT, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Latifian M, Raheb G, Abdi K, Alikhani R, Shariful Islam SM. The effectiveness of psychoeducation in improving attitudes towards psychological disorders and internalized stigma in the family members of bipolar patients: A quasi‐experimental study. Psych J 2022; 12:272-279. [PMID: 36504366 DOI: 10.1002/pchj.621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Family members of bipolar patients experience stigma following being labeled by others, which can disrupt their routine lives and result in social isolation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of psychoeducation in improving the attitudes of bipolar patients' family members towards psychological disorders and internalized stigma. The present study is a quasi-experimental study with a pre- and post-test follow-up design, in which 74 individuals were selected by convenience sampling among families who had a member with a bipolar disorder who was referred to the largest psychiatric hospital in Iran in 2021. The participants were randomly divided into the experimental and control groups (n = 37 per group). The members of the experimental group then underwent eight 90-min sessions of psychoeducation. The control group also received psychoeducation at the end of the study. The results of analysis of covariance showed that psychoeducation reduced internalized stigma in the family members of bipolar patients and increased their positive attitudes towards psychological disorders compared with the control group (p < .01). On this basis, psychoeducation can be useful to reduce the internalized stigma of family members of bipolar patients and to increase their positive attitudes towards psychological disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Latifian
- Department of Social Work University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran
| | - Ghoncheh Raheb
- Psychosis Research Center University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran
| | - Kianoush Abdi
- Department of Rehabilitation Management University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran
| | - Rosa Alikhani
- Psychosis Research Center University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences Tehran Iran
| | - Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences Deakin University Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McIntyre RS, Alda M, Baldessarini RJ, Bauer M, Berk M, Correll CU, Fagiolini A, Fountoulakis K, Frye MA, Grunze H, Kessing LV, Miklowitz DJ, Parker G, Post RM, Swann AC, Suppes T, Vieta E, Young A, Maj M. The clinical characterization of the adult patient with bipolar disorder aimed at personalization of management. World Psychiatry 2022; 21:364-387. [PMID: 36073706 PMCID: PMC9453915 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Bipolar disorder is heterogeneous in phenomenology, illness trajectory, and response to treatment. Despite evidence for the efficacy of multimodal-ity interventions, the majority of persons affected by this disorder do not achieve and sustain full syndromal recovery. It is eagerly anticipated that combining datasets across various information sources (e.g., hierarchical "multi-omic" measures, electronic health records), analyzed using advanced computational methods (e.g., machine learning), will inform future diagnosis and treatment selection. In the interim, identifying clinically meaningful subgroups of persons with the disorder having differential response to specific treatments at point-of-care is an empirical priority. This paper endeavours to synthesize salient domains in the clinical characterization of the adult patient with bipolar disorder, with the overarching aim to improve health outcomes by informing patient management and treatment considerations. Extant data indicate that characterizing select domains in bipolar disorder provides actionable information and guides shared decision making. For example, it is robustly established that the presence of mixed features - especially during depressive episodes - and of physical and psychiatric comorbidities informs illness trajectory, response to treatment, and suicide risk. In addition, early environmental exposures (e.g., sexual and physical abuse, emotional neglect) are highly associated with more complicated illness presentations, inviting the need for developmentally-oriented and integrated treatment approaches. There have been significant advances in validating subtypes of bipolar disorder (e.g., bipolar I vs. II disorder), particularly in regard to pharmacological interventions. As with other severe mental disorders, social functioning, interpersonal/family relationships and internalized stigma are domains highly relevant to relapse risk, health outcomes, and quality of life. The elevated standardized mortality ratio for completed suicide and suicidal behaviour in bipolar disorder invites the need for characterization of this domain in all patients. The framework of this paper is to describe all the above salient domains, providing a synthesis of extant literature and recommendations for decision support tools and clinical metrics that can be implemented at point-of-care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger S. McIntyre
- Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology UnitUniversity Health NetworkTorontoONCanada,Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada,Department of PharmacologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| | - Martin Alda
- Department of PsychiatryDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNSCanada,National Institute of Mental HealthKlecanyCzech Republic
| | - Ross J. Baldessarini
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA,International Consortium for Bipolar & Psychotic Disorders ResearchMcLean HospitalBelmontMAUSA,Mailman Research CenterMcLean HospitalBelmontMAUSA
| | - Michael Bauer
- University Hospital Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - Michael Berk
- IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of MedicineDeakin UniversityGeelongVICAustralia,Orygen, National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental HealthCentre for Youth Mental Health, University of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Christoph U. Correll
- Department of PsychiatryZucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell HealthGlen OaksNYUSA,Department of Psychiatry and Molecular MedicineZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/NorthwellHempsteadNYUSA,Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryCharité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | | | - Kostas Fountoulakis
- 3rd Department of Psychiatry, Division of Neurosciences, School of MedicineAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
| | - Mark A. Frye
- Department of Psychiatry & PsychologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Heinz Grunze
- Allgemeinpsychiatrie OstKlinikum am WeissenhofWeinsbergGermany,Paracelsus Medical Private University NurembergNurembergGermany
| | - Lars V. Kessing
- Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research CenterPsychiatric Center CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark,Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - David J. Miklowitz
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral SciencesUniversity of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Semel InstituteLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Gordon Parker
- School of PsychiatryUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Robert M. Post
- School of Medicine & Health SciencesGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonDCUSA,Bipolar Collaborative NetworkBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Alan C. Swann
- Department of PsychiatryBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTXUSA
| | - Trisha Suppes
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural SciencesStanford School of Medicine and VA Palo Alto Health Care SystemPalo AltoCAUSA
| | - Eduard Vieta
- Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital ClinicUniversity of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAMBarcelonaCataloniaSpain
| | - Allan Young
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustBethlem Royal HospitalBeckenhamUK
| | - Mario Maj
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”NaplesItaly
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Comorbidity rates in Bipolar disorder rank highest among major mental disorders, especially comorbid substance use. Besides cannabis, alcohol is the most frequent substance of abuse as it is societally accepted and can be purchased and consumed legally. Estimates for lifetime comorbidity of bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorder are substantial and in the range of 40-70%, both for Bipolar I and II disorder, and with male preponderance. Alcohol use disorder and bipolarity significantly influence each other's severity and prognosis with a more complicated course of both disorders. Modern treatment concepts acknowledge the interplay between these disorders using an integrated therapy approach where both disorders are tackled in the same setting by a multi-professional team. Motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral and socio- therapies incorporating the family and social environment are cornerstones in psychotherapy whereas the accompanying pharmacological treatment aims to reduce craving and to optimize mood stability. Adding valproate to lithium may reduce alcohol consumption whereas studies with antipsychotics or naltrexone and acamprosate did not affect mood fluctuations or drinking patterns. In summary, there is a continuous need for more research in order to develop evidence-based approaches for integrated treatment of this frequent comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Grunze
- Psychiatrie Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany
- Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Heinz Grunze
| | - Martin Schaefer
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, und Suchtmedizin, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Born
- Psychiatrie Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany
- Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich W. Preuss
- Vitos Klinik Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Herborn, Germany
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie, und Psychosomatik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|